机身纤薄、摄像头性能强劲且续航持久的手机，但有一个主要缺点——摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 智能手机评测

Name: Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Brand: Motorola

剪影大师。

摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 以其轻巧的机身、时尚迷人的设计、出色的摄像头功能以及良好的续航能力而脱颖而出。其价格也相当合理。在本篇评测中，我们将详细探讨这款高端手机的各项亮点，并指出其一个主要缺点。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/14/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

对摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 的评测结论

摩托罗拉的高端智能手机Edge 70 Pro在许多方面都令人印象深刻：它配备了一块亮度出色的屏幕，电池续航能力足以满足日常使用需求，机身轻巧，机身工艺精美且坚固耐用，相机性能也极为出色，不仅具备变焦功能，还能在各种场景下拍摄出清晰锐利的照片。

然而令人沮丧的是，摩托罗拉——与其他机型一样——为这款手机配备了一颗性能略显不足的SoC。虽然这通常足以满足日常流畅使用并能运行许多应用程序，但其性能提升空间有限，导致Edge 70 Pro在性能上略逊于其直接竞争对手。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，一个优势在于零售商降价的空间相当大；因此，这款手机目前的售价已降至620美元以下。

缺点方面，长时间高强度使用时会出现明显的过热现象，性能降频也较为明显，且功耗稍高，这从电池续航时间与电池容量的对比中也能体现出来。

总体而言，摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 是一款颇具吸引力的智能手机，甚至可能对价格高出许多的机型构成严重威胁。

Pros

+ 纤薄、轻巧、耐用的机身

+ IP68/IP69级防水防尘

+ 色彩鲜艳、还原精准的144 Hz OLED显示屏

+ 功能多样、高分辨率的摄像头

+ 超长续航，快速充电

+ 强劲的信号接收能力与Wi-Fi 7支持

+ 高速UFS 4.1存储

+ 均衡的扬声器

Cons

- SoC性能相对较弱

- 严重过热和降频现象

- 功耗相对较高

- USB 2.0速度较慢且无视频输出功能

- 无microSD卡槽

- 软件支持周期相对较短

- PWM闪烁

价格与供货情况

这款手机实际上在许多国家都有售，例如在和 amazon.co.uk 上，或者在和 amazon.in 上，但目前在美国尚未发售。

对摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 的评测结论
规格
案例——颜色与材质的选择
特点——价格差异显著
软件——摩托罗拉提供5年系统更新
通信与GNSS——全球移动通信
相机——明亮的图像
配件与保修——不包含电源适配器
输入设备与操作——专为“快手”设计
显示屏——更明亮、更精准的屏幕
表现——我们本可以做得更好
排放量——大幅减少
电池续航时间——续航能力良好
Notebookcheck 综合评分
各种可行方案的比较

规格

Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Edge 70 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 8500 8c/8t, 1 x 3.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 3 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 4 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, Cortex-A725

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G720 MP8

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.78 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, 360 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 476 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66/B71), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n70/n71/n77/n78/n80/n81/n83/n84/n89/n94), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 162.7 x 75.6

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90 Watt wired charging, 15 Watt wireless charging, 5 Watt wireless reverse charging, 15 Watt wired reverse charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase shift AF, OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.0, phase shift AF, wide angle, macro (camera 2); 50.0MP, phase shift AF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, periscope tele (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9), phase shift AF, Videos @2160p/60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB cable, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.98W/kg head, 1.45W/kg body; eSIM, fanless, waterproof

Weight

183 g

Price

800 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例——颜色与材质的选择

这款手机的设计延续了摩托罗拉一贯的经典优势：摄像头模组融入得十分优雅，潘通色系呈现出迷人的视觉效果，而IP68/IP69认证则确保了其具备出色的防尘防水性能。

纤薄的设计让这款手机显得格外优雅，尤其是从侧面看时。其重量仅为183克，比平均水平更轻。不过，您无需担心手机会弯曲，因为它的做工非常坚固，在我们的测试中也没有出现弯曲现象。

根据所选手机壳的颜色不同，机身背面的质感也各不相同，从实木、醋酸纤维到丝绸般的触感应有尽有。

尺寸对比

Motorola Edge 70 Pro Motorola Edge 60 Pro Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Samsung Galaxy S26+ Vivo X300 DIN A6 ❌

特点——价格差异显著

这款高端手机提供两种存储配置：8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间，或 12 GB 内存 / 512 GB 存储空间。我们建议选择存储空间更大的版本，但鉴于价格差异较大，您应在做出决定前仔细比较各种选项。

该智能手机配备 USB 2.0 接口，因此数据传输速度较慢，且不支持有线视频输出。

该手机支持 nano-SIM 卡，但也可通过 eSIM 实现双卡模式。不配备 microSD 卡槽。

软件——摩托罗拉提供5年系统更新

Edge 70 Pro 预装了 Android 16 系统。安全补丁计划每两个月发布一次，直至 2031 年。这比苹果和三星提供的支持周期短得多——实际上甚至未达到当前欧盟指令的要求。

在初始设置过程中，如果不加注意，许多游戏和应用会被预装。遗憾的是，这一功能在许多智能手机上早已启用。

可持续发展

摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 的包装中不含任何塑料。遗憾的是，制造商并未提供有关生产和使用过程中产生多少二氧化碳的信息；仅表示与上一代产品相比，二氧化碳排放量减少了 25%。

通信与GNSS——全球移动通信

这款手机支持多种4G和5G频段，因此您在前往世界许多地区旅行时都能使用它。在我们的测试中，信号接收非常强劲，即使在信号极差的地区也没有出现断连现象。

该手机支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准，当与我们的参考路由器华硕 RT-BE96U 配对使用时，可实现极高的数据传输速率——即使对于高速家庭网络而言也绰绰有余。连接稳定性同样非常出色。

Networking
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1334 (min: 1197) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1634 (min: 1541) MBit/s ∼71%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼87%
Vivo X300 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1843 (min: 1759) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1802 (min: 1718) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	825 (min: 792) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	887 (min: 479) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	914 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼91%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2238 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2315 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	691 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	739 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1274 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1398 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2029 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2080 (min: 398) MBit/s ∼90%

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø1334 (1197-1426) MBit/s

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø1634 (1541-1692) MBit/s

通常情况下，与各种卫星网络的连接建立得非常迅速，且定位结果十分准确。

在开阔地带，定位非常精准；但在狭窄的小巷中，定位可能会出现几米的偏差——这一点我们在实地测试中已经发现。不过总体而言，Edge 70 Pro 非常适合导航使用。

相机——明亮的图像

“无处不在的5000万像素”似乎是摩托罗拉的口号：Edge 70 Pro配备了四颗镜头——后置三颗，前置一颗——且它们的像素数完全相同。

主摄像头拍摄的照片清晰锐利，曝光恰到好处——有时甚至略显过曝，这在光线极强的日子里可能会导致照片曝光过度。但在光线较暗的环境中，这反倒是一大优势，因为即使在光线不足的区域，也能保留丰富的细节。

视频支持以最高 60 fps 的帧率录制 4K 视频，得益于高感光度，即使在光线稍暗的房间内，视频效果依然出色。自动对焦几乎无感。

超广角镜头在画面边缘会有轻微畸变，但整体拍摄效果良好。

前置摄像头拍摄的自拍照非常清晰，且动态范围表现不俗。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

这款配备3.5倍潜望式变焦的长焦镜头，即使在最高10倍放大倍率下，也能拍摄出令人惊叹的清晰照片。此时，AI处理的效果尤为明显，但你仍然可以将手机当作双筒望远镜来使用。

ColorChecker Motorola Edge 70 Pro: 12.62 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 19.53 ∆E

配件与保修——不包含电源适配器

一条USB数据线和一个硅胶保护壳——遗憾的是，至少在欧洲市场，摩托罗拉Edge 70 Pro的包装盒里就只有这些。

该保修期在欧盟境内有效期为24个月。

输入设备与操作——专为“快手”设计

该屏幕刷新率最高可达144 Hz，触控采样率最高可达360 Hz。由于屏幕每秒可渲染多帧画面，且触控采样频率更高，因此使用摩托罗拉Edge 70 Pro时响应非常灵敏。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕下方。其位置高度适中，解锁手机既快速又可靠。该机还支持面部识别功能；在我们的测试中表现良好，但在防篡改方面安全性稍逊一筹。

显示屏——更明亮、更精准的屏幕

这款OLED屏幕分辨率高，亮度极高，正常工作时最高可达1,684 cd/m²。在我们的测试中，局部区域的亮度甚至可超过 3,000 cd/m²。

不过，我们测得其 PWM 闪烁频率约为 144 Hz。因此，对此敏感的用户在购买前应先测试屏幕。


1585 cd/m²	1603 cd/m²	1622 cd/m²
1607 cd/m²	1684 cd/m²	1623 cd/m²
1644 cd/m²	1652 cd/m²	1611 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1684 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1625.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1684 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.88 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.145
CCT: 6469 K

	Motorola Edge 70 Pro AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Motorola Edge 60 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy S26+ LTPO-AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Display			-1%	5%	-14%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	3326		2386 -28%	3475 4%	2751 -17%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	3244		4072 26%	3406 5%	2875 -11%
Response Times		-495%	33%	11%	-48%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)	18.6 ?(1.1, 17.5) -1063%	0.75 ?(0.384, 0.3635) 53%	1.11 ?(0.5685, 0.5415) 31%	3.79 ?(2.137, 1.648) -137%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	1 ?(0.5, 0.5)	1.8 ?(0.9, 0.9) -80%	0.77 ?(0.4105, 0.3565) 23%	1.05 ?(0.5245, 0.529) -5%	1.18 ?(0.6195, 0.561) -18%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	144	715.7	360	120	240
PWM Amplitude * (%)	17	75 -341%	12.85 24%	16.04 6%	15.27 10%
Screen		-20%	-31%	-34%	-79%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1684	1099 -35%	1537 -9%	1104 -34%	1384 -18%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1626	1073 -34%	1523 -6%	1102 -32%	1379 -15%
Brightness Distribution (%)	94	91 -3%	96 2%	97 3%	95 1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.88	1.25 -42%	1.4 -59%	1.2 -36%	2.8 -218%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.89	1.68 11%	2.6 -38%	2.4 -27%	4.5 -138%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.2	1.4 -17%	2.1 -75%	2.1 -75%	2.2 -83%
Gamma	2.145 ^103%	2.031 ^108%	2.28 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.05 ^107%
CCT	6469 ^100%	6403 ^102%	6754 ^96%	6472 ^100%	6514 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-258% / -178%	0% / -8%	-6% / -15%	-47% / -59%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

144 Hz
Amplitude: 17 %

The display backlight flickers at 144 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 144 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来呈平坦状，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）

我们非常喜欢“自然”模式下的色彩还原效果。

总体而言，屏幕上的图像色彩鲜艳，而且得益于OLED屏幕的纯黑效果，对比度非常高。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5 ms rise
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).

即使在阳光明媚的日子里，这块屏幕在户外使用也完全没问题。

可视角度也完全没问题。

表现——我们本可以做得更好

该联发科天玑8500 SoC 的性能固然强劲，但在摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 的同价位产品中，还有性能更强的 SoC，这一点在跑分结果中得到了清晰体现。

在日常使用中，系统通常运行流畅，但在运行要求更高的应用程序时，很快就会达到性能极限。

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3397 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3209 Points +92%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=194, last 2 years)	1873 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1675 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (1564 - 1728, n=3)	1656 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1564 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1457 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11034 Points +66%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	9998 Points +51%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6642 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (6478 - 6762, n=3)	6627 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6478 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=194, last 2 years)	5580 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4616 Points -31%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2755585 Points +60%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1717495 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	1717495 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=101, last 2 years)	1543028 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1409057 Points -18%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	19261 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	19076 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	16845 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (16598 - 16845, n=2)	16722 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	16598 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=148, last 2 years)	15127 Points -10%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2098 Points +102%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1287 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=113, last 2 years)	1260 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (1041 - 1287, n=2)	1164 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1041 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11566 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11422 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9423 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (9265 - 9423, n=2)	9344 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9265 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=122, last 2 years)	8094 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	7178 Points -23%
System
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	14659 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	12733 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=122, last 2 years)	11633 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	11003 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (10954 - 11003, n=2)	10979 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10954 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	8213 Points -25%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	13372 Points +28%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11589 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10455 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (10367 - 10455, n=2)	10411 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10367 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=122, last 2 years)	9363 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	8146 Points -22%
Graphics
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	46112 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	42732 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	40006 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (39353 - 40006, n=2)	39680 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	39353 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=122, last 2 years)	28682 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	26099 Points -35%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2321 Points +26%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2245 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1845 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (1785 - 1845, n=2)	1815 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1785 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=122, last 2 years)	1759 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1521 Points -18%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	63650 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	63113 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (51276 - 63650, n=2)	57463 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	51276 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	22076 Points -65%
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 81594, n=108, last 2 years)	21468 Points -66%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	29976 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (28680 - 29976, n=2)	29328 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	28680 Points
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=85, last 2 years)	17603 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1998 Points -93%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1054 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (921 - 1054, n=2)	988 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	921 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	756 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=115, last 2 years)	666 Points -37%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	612 Points -42%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	7557 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (7194 - 7557, n=2)	7376 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	7194 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=115, last 2 years)	2616 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	767 Points -90%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	621 Points -92%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9585 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (9298 - 9585, n=2)	9442 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9298 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=115, last 2 years)	3918 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1621 Points -83%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	1409 Points -85%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5853 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4913 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (4709 - 4913, n=2)	4811 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4709 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4443 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	Points -100%

在图形性能方面，与同价位手机相比，它也仅处于中等水平。虽然大多数游戏都能在这款智能手机上运行，但在高细节设置下，你无法体验到高帧率带来的真正流畅的游戏体验。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7232 Points +88%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7101 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4304 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3857 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3060 Points -21%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7206 Points +80%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7089 Points +77%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4311 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4011 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3110 Points -22%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26896 Points +93%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26476 Points +90%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14679 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13946 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10786 Points -23%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13785 Points +1825%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5058 Points +606%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	716 Points
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	703 Points -2%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13696 Points +1779%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4946 Points +578%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	729 Points
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	712 Points -2%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3212 Points +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3134 Points +95%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1609 Points
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1529 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1218 Points -24%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3265 Points +101%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3145 Points +94%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1624 Points
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1563 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1222 Points -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	946 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	689 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	575 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	460 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	456 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	439 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	223 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	383 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	344 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +30%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +30%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	92 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79 fps -14%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps +87%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	179 fps +52%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	118 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	113 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps -10%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	71 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	146 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	102 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	313 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	163 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	141 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps

这款浏览器运行迅速，在我们的测试中，即使是复杂的网站也能快速加载。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	281.459 Points +119%
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=126, last 2 years)	161.3 Points +25%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	128.808 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	128.8 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)	111.429 Points -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	548 runs/min +232%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=86, last 2 years)	254 runs/min +54%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	165 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	165 runs/min 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)	158 runs/min -4%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	27.1 runs/min +158%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=97, last 2 years)	15.7 runs/min +50%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	13.9 runs/min +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (10.5 - 13.9, n=2)	12.2 runs/min +16%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	10.5 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=106, last 2 years)	143.6 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)	115 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	113 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	113 Points 0%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	85043 Points +86%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	62098 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (45632 - 62098, n=2)	53865 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=153, last 2 years)	52655 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	45632 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)	38258 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)	1087.5 ms * -13%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=131, last 2 years)	1056 ms * -10%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	958.8 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (822 - 959, n=2)	890 ms * +7%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	821.9 ms * +14%
Vivo X300 (Chrome 143)	663.7 ms * +31%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	387.8 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 内存是目前内存芯片市场上速度最快的内存之一。这确保了快速的数据传输和较短的应用程序加载时间。

	Motorola Edge 70 Pro	Motorola Edge 60 Pro	Vivo X300	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S26+	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		50%	27%	-19%	-18%	30%	-9%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3765.9	3852.89 2%	2056.87 -45%	3576.86 -5%	3574.74 -5%	3648 ?(1954 - 4366, n=42) -3%	2248 ?(270 - 4370, n=181, last 2 years) -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3745.6	3842.42 3%	1997.76 -47%	3565.14 -5%	2543.31 -32%	3199 ?(339 - 4113, n=42) -15%	1930 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=181, last 2 years) -48%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	399.6	439.58 10%	332.61 -17%	324.76 -19%	419.84 5%	413 ?(279 - 614, n=42) 3%	312 ?(47.6 - 614, n=181, last 2 years) -22%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	206.8	585.66 183%	654.09 216%	112.05 -46%	122.63 -41%	489 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=42) 136%	362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=181, last 2 years) 75%

排放量——大幅减少

温度

在高负载状态下，机身温度可能会成为问题，尤其是我们目前仍在室温环境下进行测试。在户外高温天气下，这些温度甚至可能超过50°C。

这一点也体现在SoC有时会出现严重的降频现象上，我们通过3DMark压力测试检测到了这一情况。这一问题在前代机型中就已经存在，因此很可能与纤薄的设计有关。

Max. Load

Idle


46.9 °C	45.7 °C	42.5 °C
47.4 °C	47 °C	42.6 °C
47.8 °C	46.2 °C	41.8 °C

Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 45.3 °C


41.5 °C	42.9 °C	44 °C
40.9 °C	43.3 °C	43.9 °C
41.8 °C	43.8 °C	44.9 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 43 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.7 %
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.9 %
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.4 % +52%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.6 % +22%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48.9 %
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.7 % -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42.1 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	82 % +87%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.6 % +38%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	43.9 %
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	41.3 % -6%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	75.4 % +76%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.6 % +49%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.9 % +42%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.8 %
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	41.6 % -3%

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø14.3 (11.7-24) %

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø16.6 (10.5-23.8) %

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.93 (4.82-11.3) %

演讲者

底部边缘的扬声器配合听筒，营造出相当饱满的立体声效果，在播放流行音乐时尤为出色。即使是古典音乐，声音依然相当清晰，各乐器的声音也容易分辨。

耳机和扬声器可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接，音质清晰。无线连接支持多种音频编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Edge 70 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间——续航能力良好

能量摄入

Edge 70 Pro 在待机模式下的能效并非最佳，而且在我们进行的各项基准测试中，它很难恢复到低功耗状态。在满载运行时，其功耗处于正常水平。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.4 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Load	9.7 / 13.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Edge 70 Pro 6500 mAh	Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-8%	7%	30%	11%	13%	20%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.4	1.3 7%	0.6 57%	0.97 31%	0.56 60%	1.207 ?(0.97 - 1.4, n=3) 14%	0.88 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=140, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.6	1.9 -19%	2.02 -26%	1.19 26%	1.28 20%	1.557 ?(1.19 - 1.88, n=3) 3%	1.484 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=140, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.9	2.4 -26%	2.08 -9%	1.28 33%	1.31 31%	1.723 ?(1.28 - 1.99, n=3) 9%	1.671 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=140, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average * (Watt)	9.7	8.6 11%		5.99 38%	12.38 -28%	7.15 ?(5.77 - 9.7, n=3) 26%	6.78 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=105, last 2 years) 30%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	13.2	14.9 -13%		10.53 20%	16.9 -28%	11.3 ?(10 - 13.2, n=3) 14%	11.4 ?(4.75 - 22, n=105, last 2 years) 14%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.2 (2.08-13) Watt

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.611 (1.537-1.842) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.45 (3.12-3.5) Watt

Motorola Edge 70 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.611 (1.537-1.842) Watt

电池续航时间

尽管机身设计纤薄，摩托罗拉仍成功在该设备中搭载了一块6,500毫安时电池。因此，在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中，该手机的续航时间达到了21小时37分钟。这轻松足以支撑一整天的工作——通常甚至能撑过两天。

该机支持最高90瓦的快充，电池可在不到一小时内充满。此外还支持无线充电，并可通过反向充电功能，利用手机电池为外设提供有线或无线供电。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		21h 37min

	Motorola Edge 70 Pro 6500 mAh	Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	21.6	22.4 4%	19.6 -9%	19.4 -10%	17.8 -18%

Notebookcheck 综合评分

一款配备多功能摄像头且电池续航表现出色的优质智能手机。

Edge 70 Pro 目前已上市，价格相对实惠，但若能搭载更快的 SoC 就更好了。

Back to the verdict

Motorola Edge 70 Pro - 07/14/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

52 / 69 → 75%

Weight

90%

Battery

93%

Display

93%

Games Performance

30 / 55 → 54%

Application Performance

68 / 85 → 80%

AI Performance

75%

Temperature

83%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

82%

Average

67%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
10%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
7%

Software Updates
76.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 46.5%

各种可行方案的比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 83.2%	Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 800€	183 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
2. 81.5%	Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $428.34 Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro 5G... 2. $360.80 Motorola Edge 2025 \| Unlocke... 3. $479.99 Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro 5G... List Price: 600 Euro	186 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED
3. 88%	Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1049€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED
4. 83.8%	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 400€	202 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED
5. 89%	Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1249€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI LTPO-AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

机身纤薄、摄像头性能强劲且续航持久的手机，但有一个主要缺点——摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 智能手机评测

剪影大师。

对摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Pro 的评测结论

Pros

Cons

价格与供货情况

Table of Contents

规格

案例——颜色与材质的选择

尺寸对比

特点——价格差异显著

软件——摩托罗拉提供5年系统更新

可持续发展

通信与GNSS——全球移动通信

相机——明亮的图像

配件与保修——不包含电源适配器

输入设备与操作——专为“快手”设计

显示屏——更明亮、更精准的屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

表现——我们本可以做得更好

排放量——大幅减少

温度

3DMark 压力测试

演讲者

Motorola Edge 70 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

电池续航时间——续航能力良好

能量摄入

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

各种可行方案的比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles