Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus, rear
Price comparison
Average of 26 scores (from 39 reviews)
Reviews for the Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
没有风扇的i5版本Surface Pro性能上明显不如i7版本,而且续航也没有多大提升。但这换来的是完全的静音和低了不少的价格,这是否能让它成为适合大家的主流Windows平板电脑呢?
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Surface Pro 6 isn't for everyone. It's for people who will truly benefit from having a detachable 2-in-1 that's light enough to carry anywhere and flexible enough to use as a tablet or laptop.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionMicrosoft hasn’t broken any new ground with the Surface Pro 6 unless you consider the quad-core 8th-gen processors to be a breakthrough.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you are considering buying a Surface Pro then yes, this is the best yet. Great screen, battery and power to burn. It is still the one although I love the HP Envy x2 and ASUS Zen. I will be anxiously awaiting a review of HP’s new luxury leather Folio x2 just released.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 78% performance: 79% workmanship: 100%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe sixth-gen Pro is the best to date thanks largely to improved battery life. However, the familiar form factor, bezels that are larger than competitors' equivalents, and lack of USB-C port feels like this Surface is holding back from what's around the corner.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionRegrettably, the Surface Pro 6 carries on the repair, or un-repairability tradition scoring 1-out-of-10. While that is not good, it is due to copious amounts of hot melt glue and almost everything inside being surface mounted. While batteries are replaceable, the path to get there is fraught with danger.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: PC Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith a slight power boost and a new color choice, the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 may not have changed much from the previous iteration, but what we loved then, we still love now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Source: PC World
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionMicrosoft's Surface Pro 6 is the latest iteration of its iconic Windows tablet, complete with an 8th-generation, quad-core chip inside of it. While it's nearly identical to earlier Surface Pro versions, that means its design remains one of the best—plus, it offers very good battery life compared to similar competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe latest Surface Pro tablet doesn't make any radical design changes, but the performance jump makes it viable as a mainstream performance laptop replacement.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Stuff TV
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Surface Pro 6 isn’t for everyone but it’s a very capable two-in-one tablet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Surface Pro 6 is the complete tablet PC package: It’s fast, light and has a great keyboard cover. But that was also true of last year’s model. And it’s facing stiffer competition this year from the Surface Go.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Good Gear Guide
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSet aside what the Surface Pro 6 should be, though, and what you have is this: Microsoft’s implicit statement that the Surface Pro lineup has reached its zenith, and needs no further improvement save for periodic upgrades. HP and Lenovo would probably disagree. I stand by what I said in my review of the Surface Pro (2017): You can’t go wrong buying a Surface Pro 6. But you might be able to do better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is all about performance improvements tied with a shiny new color scheme. Beyond that, not much – if anything – has changed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 92% mobility: 82%
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/22/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/01/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/26/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/03/2019
Source: Hipertextual
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Xataka
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 88% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 88%
Source: PC Guia
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Webnews.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% performance: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Webnews.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: Techzine
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Fredzone
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 95%
Source: Antyweb
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Zive
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Tek.no
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Dinside
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Lyd og Billede
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Tweak.dk
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Alt om Data
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 50% performance: 80%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Comment
Intel UHD Graphics 620:
集成显卡(GT2,24 EU),可以在一些Kaby-Lake-Refresh 中央处理器型号(15 W ULV系列)上找到。技术上与之前名为HD Graphics 620的Kaby-Lake的显卡相同。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
i5-8250U:
基于Kaby-Lake-Refresh的低功耗四核处理器。这四个内核的频率介于1.6和3.4 GHz之间(Turbo Boost),并支持超线程。集成GPU的时钟频率介于300和1,100 MHz之间。 SoC采用14nm + FinFET工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.