联想Legion 7 16 G9 笔记本电脑评测--配备 3.2K 显示屏、HX CPU 和超频 RTX 4070 的游戏本
Legion 7 16 是 Legion Pro 7 16 的我们最近才评测过它。两者之间存在差异,尤其是在显卡方面,普通Legion 7 的最大可用 GPU 为 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。不过,在处理器方面,使用了相同的英特尔 HX 芯片,除了 WQHD 面板外,还可选配高分辨率、165 Hz 3.2K IPS 面板。
我们的评测设备是售价 2,249 美元的校园版,配备了 酷睿 i9-14900HXGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及 3.2K 面板。目前,普通用户还没有相应的变体,但价格应该会高出 250-300 美元左右。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.8 % | 04/2024 | Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
89.3 % | 04/2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.4 % | 04/2024 | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 02/2024 | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.2 % | 03/2024 | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.2 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 26.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.5 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 21.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 黑色铝质指纹磁铁
Legion 7 16 是一款相当轻薄的游戏笔记本电脑,由于采用了黑色铝制外壳,因此也显得非常低调。与Legion Pro 7 不同的是,它的侧面没有突出的散热元件。从外观上看,这款笔记本的外壳非常漂亮,但由于光滑的表面会神奇地吸附指纹,所以只能保持很短的时间。因此,你应该随时准备一块抹布来清洁保护壳。屏幕边框非常薄,只有摄像头的凸起破坏了外观,不过这确实方便了打开保护套。
保护套的稳定性和制造质量都非常好,我们无法听到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。此外,键盘在受力时几乎不可能弯曲。薄薄的显示屏盖子略微灵活一些,但我们也无法在这方面造成任何图像失真。就我们的口味而言,铰链可以再坚固一些,因为在调节打开角度(最大约 170 度)时会有明显的摇晃。
Legion 7 16 是我们对比组中最轻薄的设备之一,但就重量和整体占地面积而言,两者并无巨大差异。230 瓦 PSU 的重量为 948 克。
功能 - Thunderbolt,但没有以太网
端口分布在笔记本电脑的侧面和背面。在这方面,普通的Legion 7 要比昂贵的Legion Pro 7 好一些,因为散热口只位于背面。除了以太网端口外,所有重要的标准都在这里,这对于游戏玩家来说并不理想。Thunderbolt 端口通过 iGPU 连接,这意味着当你连接外部显示器时,Nvidia GPU 不必总是处于激活状态。所有其他视频输出都直接通过 dGPU 运行。
SD 读卡器
与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)搭配使用时,右侧读卡器的平均传输速度可达 75-90 MB/s。不过,插入的卡明显突出于机壳。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware m16 R2 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
交流
Legion 内安装了 Realtek Wi-Fi 6E 模块。该模块性能良好,与我们的华硕参考路由器配合使用,传输速度高且稳定。该笔记本支持蓝牙 5.1,但没有以太网端口。
Networking | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Alienware m16 R2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
1080p 网络摄像头位于屏幕上边框内,提供一个电子快门(开关在右侧),但即使在光线良好的条件下,它也只能捕捉到一般的图像。与目前的 Meteor Lake 设备不同,该网络摄像头不支持 Windows Studio Effects。
维护
底盖由普通的十字螺丝固定,非常容易拆卸。除了两个内存模块外,还有两个 M.2 2280 插槽,不过第二个插槽的使用受到 Wi-Fi 线缆的阻碍。同样,Wi-Fi 模块和电池也可以更换。
输入设备 - 数字键盘和独立按键照明
联想为Legion 7 16 配备了非常舒适的薄膜键盘,其中包括专用数字键盘和独立按键照明。总的来说,准确而安静的按键敲击声让人毫无怨言。即使是较长的文本也能轻松输入。数字键盘的按键稍窄,但在实际使用中没有任何问题。方向键大得令人愉悦,电源键上集成了指纹扫描仪。
点击板的位置略微偏左,大小为 12 x 7.5 厘米,比例匀称。轻扫操作可以很好地实现,而且可以点击键盘的下部区域,尽管声音比较大。因此,您只能轻触鼠标垫。Legion Speed Mouse Mad M 也包括在内。
显示屏 - 3.2K、165 Hz、IPS 面板和 G-Sync
Legion 7 16 评论机配备了高分辨率、16:10 长宽比、IPS 显示屏(3200 x 2000 像素)。由于显示屏的高分辨率,主观图像质量不错,内容显示非常清晰。同样,色彩也很鲜艳,但目前的 OLED 面板能提供更生动的图像。当显示亮度较高的内容时,表面会出现轻微的颗粒感,不过联想通过将 Windows 暗模式作为标准配置,在很大程度上避免了这一问题。得益于 165 Hz 的刷新率,移动非常流畅,响应时间也很快。没有使用 PWM 闪烁。
平均亮度约为 400 cd/m²,但黑色值为 0.43 cd/m²,相当高,这也解释了为什么最大对比度仅为 1.000:1。此外,在全亮度和暗色内容下,会出现明显的漏光现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 412 cd/m²
Contrast: 958:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 MNG007ZA1-2, IPS, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H BOE CQ NE16QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 16X 2024 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R2 BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -16% | -18% | 5% | -14% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 95 | 98.5 4% | 69.3 -27% | 67.2 -29% | 99.8 5% | 71 -25% | 68.3 -28% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.4 -1% | 96.7 -3% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.6 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.2 | 86.7 -1% | 70.1 -20% | 69.3 -21% | 97 11% | 71.4 -18% | 69.6 -20% |
Response Times | 16% | -4% | 37% | 98% | 20% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.4 ? | 12.6 ? 12% | 11.9 ? 17% | 7.5 ? 48% | 0.2 ? 99% | 5.7 ? 60% | 13.2 ? 8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.2 ? | 5.8 ? 19% | 8.9 ? -24% | 5.4 ? 25% | 0.2 ? 97% | 8.7 ? -21% | 6.6 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | ||||||
Screen | 3% | -11% | -58% | 133% | -26% | -69% | |
Brightness middle | 412 | 487 18% | 384 -7% | 542 32% | 390 -5% | 345.8 -16% | 376 -9% |
Brightness | 396 | 460 16% | 366 -8% | 504 27% | 392 -1% | 337 -15% | 358 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 86 -3% | 98 10% | 87 -2% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.42 2% | 0.35 19% | 0.45 -5% | 0.02 95% | 0.3 30% | 0.33 23% |
Contrast | 958 | 1160 21% | 1097 15% | 1204 26% | 19500 1935% | 1153 20% | 1139 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.12 -24% | 0.97 -8% | 2.73 -203% | 1.94 -116% | 1.99 -121% | 2.74 -204% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 2.26 -13% | 3.57 -79% | 5.29 -165% | 4.26 -113% | 3.52 -76% | 6.78 -239% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 0.54 10% | 0.77 -28% | 1.32 -120% | 4.21 -602% | 0.62 -3% | 0.88 -47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.4 -0% | 1.5 -7% | 2.9 -107% | 1.5 -7% | 2.1 -50% | 3.57 -155% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.242 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.192 100% | 2.221 99% | 2.32 95% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6731 97% | 6809 95% | 6709 97% | 6173 105% | 6395 102% | 6369 102% | 7246 90% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
5% | -10% /
-11% | -13% /
-36% | 79% /
101% | -7% /
-17% | -26% /
-47% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析。联想提供了各种配置文件,开箱即用的默认配置文件可提供准确的图像。此外,还有一个原生配置文件可供选择,该配置文件具有更高的最大亮度(约 455 cd/m²),但色温过高,色彩偏差也较大。通过校准,我们能够进一步改善图像,并可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件。同样,联想还提供了非常精确的 sRGB 模式,这对于编辑图像尤为重要。sRGB 色彩空间完全覆盖;P3 至 95%。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.9 ms rise | |
↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.9 ms rise | |
↘ 7.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
由于采用了哑光显示屏,该面板也可以在户外使用,但在明亮的日子里,亮度可能会更高。IPS 面板的视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - Raptor Lake HX 和超频 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
测试条件
像往常一样,联想提供了各种能耗配置文件,我们在下表中汇总了相应的性能数据。当前配置文件也通过电源按钮的 LED 显示。我们在性能模式下进行了基准测试和测量,在该模式下 GPU 会自动略微超频(核心频率 +100 MHz,VRAM 频率 +200 MHz)。使用电池模式时,性能模式不可用。
能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra |
最大风扇音量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音模式 | 65 -> 54 瓦 | 20,203 点 | 65 瓦 | 8,239 点 | 35 FPS | 38.4 dB(A) |
平衡 | 120 -> 85 瓦 | 24,142 点 | 95 瓦 | 9,853 点 | 41.5 FPS | 50.7 dB(A) |
性能模式 | 154 -> 90 瓦 | 31,127 分 | 115 瓦 | 12,174 分 | 51.4 FPS | 54.1 dB(A) |
注:我们尝试更新 Nvidia 驱动程序,但未成功。官方驱动程序因兼容性问题终止了安装。到目前为止,联想本身只提供了预装的 537.70 驱动程序,这也是我们不可避免要使用的驱动程序。
处理器 - 酷睿 i9-14900HX
联想还为普通的Legion 7 16 配备了 酷睿 i9-14900HX处理器,这是最快的 Raptor Lake 移动处理器,也可以在更昂贵的 Legion Pro 7.与两款较厚的Legion Pro 7/5 16 机型相比,较薄的机身在功耗限制方面有一定影响,在短暂达到 154 瓦之后又降至 90 瓦。总之,无论是多核测试还是单核测试,性能都非常出色。在电池模式下,处理器的最大功耗为 60 瓦,这也是多核性能降低约 40% 的原因。其他 CPU 基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware m16 R2 -1! | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (20702 - 32996, n=23) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2043 - 2235, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8427 - 12419, n=23) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (779 - 859, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 4875, n=24) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (287 - 320, n=24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (102 - 164, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (87555 - 127108, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6206 - 7508, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (15849 - 18643, n=23) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2800 - 3095, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 21606, n=23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (22.7 - 34.4, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33.9 - 85.1, n=23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17244 - 29351, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (88537 - 148888, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (4267 - 7229, n=22) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148773, n=22) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (12217 - 18256, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43302 - 72594, n=22) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1265 - 2149, n=22) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (9170 - 16128, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33960 - 51118, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years) |
系统性能
主观性能印象极佳,基准测试也没有发现任何问题。 只有在图形模式之间切换时偶尔会出现卡顿,例如在游戏启动时。对于使用高级擎天柱的笔记本电脑来说,这种情况很正常。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7866 - 8550, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=199, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10621 - 11815, n=5) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=198, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9701 - 11103, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12114 - 14827, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=198, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2002 - 2312, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1827 - 2191, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2287 - 2458, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1769 - 2330, n=4) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (322 - 342, n=5) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (291 - 301, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m16 R2 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (431 - 449, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8023 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (56992 - 83392, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (54443 - 87507, n=22) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (51387 - 78199, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (79.7 - 105, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们使用当前 BIOS 版本进行的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了一些局限性。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
在评测设备中,联想安装了 SK Hynix 1 TB PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘,但首次启动后,用户可使用 877 GB。该固态硬盘的传输速度高达 7 GB/s,非常快,总体而言,比竞争对手要快一些。不过,虽然在持续负载下性能并不总是保持稳定,但在日常情况下你并不会注意到这一点。其他固态硬盘基准测试 在此列出.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 -GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
我们的评测设备配备了 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑虽然我们实际使用的是 115 瓦版本。此外,在性能模式下,GPU 还略微超频。在合成基准测试中,配备 140 瓦版本的Legion 7 16 稍微落后于竞争对手。不过,正如我们即将看到的那样,这与游戏基准无关,因为 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑无论如何都无法消耗掉 140 瓦的全部功率。Legion 支持高级 Optimus 显卡开关。
在持续负载下,GPU 保持完全稳定,在电池模式下,功耗限制在 50 瓦。这就是性能降低约 35% 的原因。其他 GPU 基准测试 在此列出.
3DMark 11 Performance | 35070 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25692 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12844 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 28, n=49) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 172, n=53) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 428, n=49) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Legion 7 16 的游戏性能非常出色,可以 QHD 分辨率和最高细节流畅播放所有现代游戏。即使在原始分辨率下,性能也应该足够,如果需要,还可以激活 DLSS 升频。在游戏测试对比中,评测设备的得分略高于合成测试,即使在较长时间的游戏过程中,性能也能保持完全稳定。其他游戏基准测试可在 这里.
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Alienware m16 R2 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 |
Horizon Forbidden West | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average of class Gaming (64.4 - 103.5, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (53.2 - 76.7, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
Average of class Gaming (49.9 - 83.7, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 16X 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (40.3 - 59.1, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 182.4 | 124.1 | 94.2 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 246 | 113.1 | 92 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 230 | 205 | 193.4 | 179.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 223 | 166.8 | 119.8 | 89.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 198 | 180.6 | 138.2 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 193 | 166 | 157 | 146 | 115 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 436 | 311 | 250 | 220 | 143 |
F1 23 (2023) | 287 | 284 | 222 | 70.1 | 43.9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 155.6 | 127.9 | 115.7 | 115 | 71.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 129.7 | 117.1 | 99.6 | 85.2 | 51.4 |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 107.1 | 103.4 | 73.2 | 64.4 | 49.9 |
排放 - 噪音大但冷却效果好
噪音排放
在执行简单任务时,Legion 7 16 的散热功能经常处于停用状态,即使在性能模式下也是如此。在日常情况下,您可以放心地切换到静音模式,将风扇噪音降至最低。静音模式下的最大噪音为 38.4 dB(A),在不戴耳机的情况下也仍然可以播放,但在其他两种模式下,50 和 54 dB(A) 的噪音都太大了。尽管如此,两款 Legion Pro 5和 Legion Pro 7的声音还要大一些。在负载期间,风扇也会迅速降低转速。评测设备中没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.8 / 54.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Aorus 16X 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Alienware m16 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -21% | -9% | -2% | -1% | -22% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 23.9 2% | 26 -6% | 24 2% | 24.7 -1% | 23 6% | 24 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 24.3 1% | 26 -6% | 29 -18% | 25.3 -3% | 23 6% | 25 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.5 | 24.3 1% | 32 -31% | 30 -22% | 25.3 -3% | 28.48 -16% | 30 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 28.9 -18% | 38 -55% | 31 -27% | 25.3 -3% | 28.48 -16% | 45 -84% |
Load Average * | 34.8 | 45.8 -32% | 54 -55% | 45 -29% | 31.7 9% | 30 14% | 50 -44% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.1 | 51 6% | 50 8% | 44 19% | 53.8 1% | 54.12 -0% | 54 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 54.1 | 56.6 -5% | 55 -2% | 47 13% | 62 -15% | 54.12 -0% | 56 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲和低负载运行时,铝制机箱依然保持凉爽,甚至在游戏时也比预期的要好。在某些地方,我们测得的温度值为 42 至 43 °C,虽然在使用键盘时也会注意到这一点,但这并不会导致用户体验受限,而且,尽管Legion 7 的底座更薄,但其性能再次优于两款同类专业机型。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载压力测试中,GPU 的运行功率为 90 瓦,CPU 的运行功率约为 54 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.7 °C / 101.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.8 °C / -17.7 F).
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -15% | -10% | -14% | -20% | -7% | -18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.7 | 43.8 -0% | 41 6% | 49 -12% | 44.8 -3% | 46 -5% | 46 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.9 | 55.4 -29% | 41 4% | 63 -47% | 48 -12% | 44 -3% | 49 -14% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.1 | 32.8 -13% | 37 -27% | 30 -3% | 37.2 -28% | 32 -10% | 38 -31% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.6 | 36 -18% | 38 -24% | 29 5% | 42 -37% | 33 -8% | 37 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这两款立体声扬声器都表现出色,但与价格更高的 Legion Pro 7 16.不过,偶尔看电影/连续剧或听背景音乐时,这些模块已经足够了。在玩游戏时,由于风扇声音较大,我们建议使用耳机。
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 平均电池运行时间
耗电量
在功耗测量中,评测设备并没有给我们带来惊喜,在闲置状态下,我们记录到的最大功耗接近 22 瓦。在性能模式下,230 瓦的 PSU 曾一度成为限制因素,但很快就趋于稳定,功耗迅速降至 200 瓦。总而言之,230 瓦的电源适配器大小适中。不过,联想可以改进超过 1.1 瓦的待机功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 1.15 Watt |
Idle | 15.4 / 21.2 / 21.9 Watt |
Load |
128.5 / 239.1 Watt |
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 4% | 6% | 20% | -27% | 12% | 1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 13 16% | 10 35% | 8.1 47% | 11 29% | 16 -4% | 12.1 ? 21% | 13.9 ? 10% |
Idle Average * | 21.2 | 18 15% | 18 15% | 13 39% | 15.2 28% | 21 1% | 16.9 ? 20% | 19.2 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 21.9 | 35 -60% | 32 -46% | 40.3 -84% | 16 27% | 36 -64% | 24.1 ? -10% | 27 ? -23% |
Load Average * | 128.5 | 138 -7% | 128 -0% | 79 39% | 64 50% | 132 -3% | 99 ? 23% | 111.3 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 188.4 | 172.6 8% | 148.4 21% | 188.1 -0% | 179 5% | 267 -42% | ||
Load Maximum * | 239.1 | 222 7% | 242 -1% | 254.9 -7% | 280 -17% | 360 -51% | 220 ? 8% | 251 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
联想在其Legion 7 16 中安装了 99.9 Wh 的电池,总体而言,运行时间可以说相当平均。在 150 cd/m²(占评测设备最大亮度的 63%)和 60 Hz 下,我们的 Wi-Fi 测试持续了 7 个多小时(165 Hz 下约 6.5 小时),在全亮度和 60 Hz 下约 5.5 小时(165 Hz 下约 5 小时)。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中,我们记录的时间略高于 10 小时,在负载情况下,最糟糕的情况是 50 分钟后熄灯。
Legion 提供两种充电模式,使用普通模式,一个完整的充电周期需要 97 分钟(约 64 分钟后达到 80%)。使用快速模式则需要 79 分钟(34 分钟后即可充满 80%)。
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 0% | 34% | -33% | 17% | 69% | -14% | 7% | |
H.264 | 620 | 541 -13% | 609 -2% | 400 ? -35% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 433 | 290 -33% | 481 11% | 292 -33% | 483 12% | 501 16% | 373 -14% | 368 ? -15% |
Load | 49 | 65 33% | 100 104% | 60 22% | 143 192% | 84.5 ? 72% | ||
Reader / Idle | 403 | 753 | 758 | 545 ? |
Pros
Cons
评价:低调而高性能的游戏笔记本电脑
联想新推出的Legion 7i 16 G9 是一款比较轻薄的游戏笔记本电脑,在测试中没有暴露出任何明显的弱点。与更昂贵的 Legion Pro 7在长时间的 CPU 性能和配备的 GPU 方面(Legion 7 的最高性能为 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑),你不得不接受其局限性,但与 Pro 相比,铝制机箱仍然更凉爽,而且总体而言,散热工作做得非常好。风扇仍然是个问题,因为在使用任何一种快速能量模式进行游戏时,你都需要一个耳机。不过,这也适用于竞争对手,使用静音模式时,可以在牺牲部分性能的情况下获得可承受的音量。
此外,与Legion Pro 相比,更薄的机身更不引人注目。任何追求丰富照明选项的人都会感到失望,但另一方面,这也使Legion 7 16 适合其他目标群体。唯一令人讨厌的是表面的指纹敏感问题。除了缺少以太网端口外,所有重要的接口都在机上,输入设备也没有问题。
新款联想Legion 7i 16 G9 是一款抢眼的游戏笔记本电脑,性能出众,功能齐全。高分辨率的 IPS 显示屏也适用于查看和编辑图像,而且没有实现 PWM。
总体而言,可选的 IPS 显示屏及其 3,200 x 2,000 像素的分辨率做得不错,尽管主观图像印象和响应时间无法与 OLED 面板相提并论。好的一面是没有 PWM,也没有恼人的反光。同样,由于该平台及其 HX 处理器需要过多的电量,电池运行时间也只能算一般。
Legion 7 16 在与同类产品的对比中也表现出色。特别是,如果你想要比 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑更快的 GPU,Legion Pro 7 是合适的。在功率相当的情况下 Legion Pro 5相比之下,Pro 5 显得更加笨重,而且屏幕效果也较差。惠普 HP Omen Transcend配备了 240 Hz OLED 屏幕,但性能稍差,价格较高。
价格和供应情况
Legion 7i 16 G9 可直接从联想购买,价格约为 2099 美元。
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
-
04/13/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.