技嘉A5 X1在审查。强大的游戏笔记本电脑
Gigabyte的15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑采用了锐真9 5900HX-APU和一个GeForce RTX 3070笔记本电脑GPU。我们的模型可以以低于1,800欧元（约2,032美元）的价格购买。竞争者包括以下设备 MSI Katana GF66 11UG，以及Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45，以及申克XMG Apex 15，以及 HP Omen 16.
Gigabyte A5 X1 (A5 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1560 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.14.9729, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT), 512 GB
, 404 GB free
Weight
2.189 kg, Power Supply: 687 g
Price
1 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 25.3 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
外壳 - A5采用塑料外壳
A5的外壳并没有提供高质量的材料。技嘉选择了黑色的塑料外壳，其设计可以说是朴素而实用的--笔记本并不吸引人的注意。盖子的背面和基本单元的顶部有哑光的光滑表面，而底盖和狭窄的盖子边缘的表面是粗糙的。这款笔记本电脑没有配备维护舱门。电池可以从外面取出。
机箱没有显示出任何制造缺陷。缝隙尺寸准确，没有材料突起。虽然基本单元可以扭动一下，但整个情况仍在限制之内。另一方面，盖子缺乏刚性。铰链将盖子牢牢地固定在位置上，只允许它轻微晃动。最大打开角度约为120度。用一只手打开盖子是可能的。
在重量和尺寸方面，我们的比较领域中的笔记本电脑没有太大的差别。A5是较轻的设备之一。
连接性--没有雷电的技嘉笔记本电脑
A5有三个USB-A端口（1个USB 2.0，1个USB 3.2 Gen 1，1个USB 3.2 Gen 2）和一个USB-C端口（USB 3.2 Gen 2）。后者通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。这意味着有三个视频输出，加上HDMI端口和专用的Mini DisplayPort。技嘉没有为这台游戏笔记本提供存储卡读卡器。
这些端口沿着笔记本电脑的三个侧面分布。所有三个视频输出以及以太网端口都位于设备的背面。因此，相应的电缆向后面跑，不会碍事。
沟通
WLAN模块配备了英特尔的芯片（AX200），支持802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准。在最佳条件下（附近没有其他WLAN设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间距离较短）确定的传输速度非常好。Realtek RTL8125千兆位以太网控制器处理有线网络连接。它执行任务时没有任何问题。
Gigabyte A5 X1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1609 (1408-1718)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1052 (986-1142)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1358 (1242-1548)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø90.1 (35-191)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (835-956)
Gigabyte A5 X1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1488 (715-1574)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (720-827)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1409 (1308-1550)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (739-1077)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1041 (531-1102)
网络摄像头
内置网络摄像头（0.9MP）是一个积极的惊喜。拍摄的照片的颜色只在很小的程度上偏离了目标--我们很少看到这种情况。除此之外，该相机还提供了标准的质量。
1.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
辅料
除了通常的文件（快速入门指南和保修信息），笔记本电脑还配有螺丝（用于将2.5英寸存储驱动器连接到安装框架），以及一个散热垫（用于第二个固态硬盘）。
维护
在设备底部的所有螺丝（电池舱里也有螺丝）被松开后，可以用平铲子或接头整理工具帮助取下底盖--底盖在某些地方坐得很紧。之后，你可以接触到固态硬盘、第二个M.2插槽、SATA端口、WLAN模块、内存、BIOS电池和风扇。
担保
Gigabyte为这台15.6英寸的机器提供了两年的保修期。保修期延长是不可能的。
输入设备 - 键盘带有背光灯
键盘
A5配备了一个包括数字键盘在内的背光Chiclet键盘。平坦、光滑的按键提供了一个中等的行程和一个清晰的压力点。不过，按键提供的阻力可以更清晰。键盘在打字过程中略微倾斜。然而，事实证明，这并不太令人讨厌。总的来说，技嘉在这里提供了一个适合日常使用的键盘。
触摸板
一个具有多点触摸功能的触摸板（约11 x 6.3厘米）可作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面使手指很容易在其上滑行。它对角落里的输入也有反应。两个鼠标按钮的行程较短，但压力点非常清晰。
显示器 - 240 Hz IPS
虽然哑光15.6英寸显示屏（1920x1080像素）的亮度（324.7cd/m²）符合目标（>300 cd/m²），但对比度（838:1）太低。我们认为超过1,000:1的数值是好的。240赫兹的面板提供了快速的响应时间。没有检测到PWM闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 338 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 324.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 838:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.129
| Gigabyte A5 X1 AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 16-b0085ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH BOE BOE09B8, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -6% | -4% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.6 | 72.3 4% | 65.4 -6% | 66.2 -5% | 64.5 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 99.5 1% | 91.3 -7% | 96.3 -2% | 95.9 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 73.8 4% | 66.7 -6% | 67.1 -5% | 65.8 -7% |
| Response Times | -39% | -27% | -82% | -109% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.8 ? | 8 ? -67% | 7.4 ? -54% | 14 ? -192% | 15 -213% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 12.4 ? -11% | 11.2 ? -0% | 8 ? 29% | 11.6 -4% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -29% | -21% | -17% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 335 | 405 21% | 307 -8% | 349 4% | 393 17% |
| Brightness | 325 | 378 16% | 321 -1% | 304 -6% | 353 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 83 -8% | 79 -12% | 83 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.34 15% | 0.27 32% | 0.535 -34% | 0.47 -18% |
| Contrast | 838 | 1191 42% | 1137 36% | 652 -22% | 836 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.63 | 3.7 -41% | 4.67 -78% | 3.11 -18% | 2.84 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.71 | 7.77 -1% | 7.53 2% | 9.57 -24% | 7.15 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 3.49 -260% | 2.41 -148% | 0.67 31% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.88 -47% | 4.5 -13% | 5 -25% | 3.73 7% |
| Gamma | 2.129 103% | 2.57 86% | 2.276 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 7434 87% | 6342 102% | 6824 95% | 6976 93% | 7312 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.76 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.47 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-23% | -18% /
-19% | -34% /
-24% | -37% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后已经显示出良好的色彩再现，色彩偏差也在目标范围内。然而，校准显示器仍能提供明显的改进。该显示器无法完全再现AdobeRGB（71%）和DCI-P3（70%）色彩空间，sRGB色彩空间的再现率达到99%。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。当阳光不太强烈时，在户外也可以阅读显示屏。
性能--技嘉A5是一个动力室
有了A5 X1，技嘉在其产品线中拥有了一个15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑，将每一个现代游戏流畅地带到屏幕上。
测试条件
预装的控制中心允许选择一个性能配置文件（见表），以及其他事项。基准测试是使用包括自动风扇控制的 "性能模式 "配置文件执行的。一些基准测试还在其余三个配置文件下运行。结果可以在比较表中找到。娱乐模式 "配置文件被用于电池测试。
| 性能模式 | 娱乐模式 | 省电模式 | 静音模式 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制1 | 54瓦 | 52瓦 | 25瓦 | 42瓦 |
| 功率限制2 | 65瓦特 | 63瓦特 | 30瓦特 | 60瓦特 |
处理器
的CPU部分Ryzen 9 5900HXAPU（塞尚）由一个八核处理器组成，以3.3 GHz的基本时钟速度运行。通过Turbo可以增加到4.65GHz。支持同步多线程（每个核心两个线程）。
Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试在4.2GHz下处理了很短的时间，之后时钟速率下降到4至4.1GHz之间。单线程测试在3.6至4.65GHz下运行。在电池供电的情况下，CPU分别以2.4到2.5GHz（多线程）和2.2到3.5GHz（单线程）的速度运行。
我们通过连续循环运行Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试至少30分钟来验证CPU Turbo在插电时是否被持续使用。Turbo在很大程度上被使用。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2143 (2094.46-2151.12)
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Unterhaltungsmodus: Ø2090 (2047.92-2098.31)
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Stromsparmodus: Ø1326 (1320.79-1337.39)
Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Lautlosmodus: Ø2007 (1951.79-2062.81)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2126 (2093.8-2147.31)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; fan in full speed: Ø1900 (1799.78-2120.55)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; Factory settings: Ø1316 (1300.31-1341.52)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1958 (1935.55-1986)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Cinebench R23 | |
| Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (6622 - 14363, n=30) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Single Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1218 - 1499, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (2242 - 5476, n=30) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (471 - 584, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (fan in full speed) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (Factory settings) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1076 - 2267, n=29) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (197 - 243, n=25) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (219 - 442, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (36011 - 62503, n=29) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (4791 - 5905, n=29) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (5057 - 9294, n=27) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1271 - 1574, n=27) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (8.26 - 17.1, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (44.1 - 87.4, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (0.48 - 0.599, n=29) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=143, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng -9! | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 -9! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (12470 - 16014, n=26) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (79554 - 101008, n=26) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (2754 - 3444, n=26) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (87865 - 105123, n=26) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (10899 - 12806, n=26) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (43685 - 55702, n=26) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (109927 - 137901, n=26) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (706 - 878, n=26) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (v6.33.5700) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng (v6.33.5700) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (6664 - 8644, n=26) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800, Stromsparmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (14344 - 25533, n=26) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
系统性能
快速而流畅的系统为游戏、视频编辑和图像处理提供了足够的计算能力，并可在未来几年内使用。对于DDR4-3200内存来说，内置RAM的传输率处于正常水平。这与非常好的PCMark结果相辅相成。
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5419 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6593 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6263 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6875 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6875 - 6967, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9991 - 10413, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9301 - 9381, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9383 - 9561, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (36725 - 43318, n=26) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (41378 - 47593, n=26) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (32536 - 46718, n=26) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (73.5 - 97.1, n=26) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (v6.50.5800) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (v6.33.5700) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (v6.33.5700) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (v6.33.5700) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng (v6.33.5700) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们的标准化延迟监测测试（网页浏览、4K视频播放、高负荷Prime95）没有发现任何DPC延迟的问题。该系统似乎适用于实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进，甚至导致性能下降。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
* ... smaller is better
储存
Adata的NVMe SSD（M.2-2280）作为系统驱动器。它提供512GB的存储空间，并提供良好的传输速率--然而，它并不属于顶级的SSD型号。笔记本电脑可以容纳第二个NVMe SSD（M.2-2280）。两个M.2插槽都支持PCIe第4代。此外，还有一个2.5英寸存储驱动器的空间（SATA插槽和安装框架在笔记本电脑内，螺丝在盒子里）。
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2556 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2526 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
362.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
354.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2141 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2378 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
37.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
145.6 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Gigabyte A5 X1 ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø2368 (2220.67-2379.07)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW): Ø2984 (2805.94-2994.62)
图形卡
RTX 3000 GPU的实际性能取决于几个因素。冷却，内存配置，以及笔记本电脑制造商在Nvidia定义的限制范围内选择的最大TGP。Gigabyte授予 GeForce RTX 3070(所有RTX 3070笔记本电脑的概述，包括其TGPs)的最大TGP为140瓦（125瓦+15瓦动态提升）。
3DMark的结果超过了迄今为止已经确定的RTX 3070的平均水平。速率的HP Omen 16的直接竞争对手往往是在同一水平线上--尽管其TGP较低。这可能表明，A5并不总是能够利用其最大的TGP。然而，我们的TheWitcher 3测试证明了其基本潜力。
GPU可以访问快速的GDDR6图形存储器（8,192 MB）。集成在处理器中的Vega 8图形核心是活跃的，笔记本电脑与Nvidia的Optimus图形切换解决方案一起工作。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 45160 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 27915 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50228 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24068 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10535 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 -1! | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (10741 - 76300, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25763, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
游戏性能
笔记本电脑在全高清分辨率（1920x1080像素）和最高质量设置下，可以顺利显示所有最新的游戏。通过连接一个合适的显示器，也可以使用更高的分辨率。在RTX 3070的比较中，帧率高于平均水平。
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | Far Cry 5 | F1 2021 | Far Cry 6 | Riders Republic | Forza Horizon 5 | Battlefield 2042 | Halo Infinite
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 224, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (26.9 - 163.9, n=58) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12.4 - 118.8, n=61) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 212, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.3) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.3, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (27.9 - 107, n=49) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (1.3) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.3, Lautlosmodus) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (1.3) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.3, Stromsparmodus) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (21.7 - 125.8, n=50) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (Stromsparmodus) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-b0085ng (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (36.2 - 194, n=46) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (119.5 - 271, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (831795) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (831795, Unterhaltungsmodus) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (831795, Lautlosmodus) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (33.1 - 123.1, n=23) | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (800360) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 (831795, Stromsparmodus) | |
| Far Cry 6 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (94 - 167, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (74 - 102.3, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (19.1 - 69, n=3) | |
| Riders Republic - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (98 - 111, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (75 - 86, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Battlefield 2042 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (86.6 - 102, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ray Tracing | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (69.3 - 81.7, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Halo Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (90.1 - 102, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
为了验证帧率是否在很长一段时间内保持基本稳定，我们让游戏《Witcher 3》在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行了约60分钟。角色没有被移动。没有发现帧率的下降。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø95.5 (89-99)
Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Stromsparmodus: Ø72.6 (70-75)
Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Lautlosmodus: Ø69.2 (55-96)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø81.8 (77-97)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø69.9 (64-81)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø80.1 (70-84)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.1 (76-88)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 179 | 172 | 155 | 94.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 309 | 261 | 171 | 101 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152 | 146 | 131 | 124 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 170 | 127 | 95.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 103 | 90 | 75.7 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 137 | 118 | 114 | 107 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 334 | 195 | 179 | 169 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 291 | 199 | 171 | 114 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 119 | 101 | 91 | 84 |
| Riders Republic (2021) | 163 | 122 | 106 | 98 |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 191 | 120 | 109 | 75 |
| Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 134 | 107 | 95.5 | 86.6 |
| Halo Infinite (2021) | 106 | 93.9 | 90.1 |
排放 - X1在负载下产生大量的噪音
噪声排放
这两个风扇在日常使用中通常只产生很少的噪音（办公室、互联网）。然而，它们偶尔会不必要地转动起来--声压级可以上升到40dB(A)以上的数值。Gigabyte应该在这方面做进一步的调整。最高58 dB(A)（压力测试）和56 dB(A)（我们的TheWitcher 3测试），在负载下事情变得相当吵。在Omen 16只比A5略胜一筹。微星MSI Katana GF66要安静得多。
通过使用 "静音模式 "性能配置文件，可以显著降低负载下的噪音水平。在这种情况下，风扇以非常低的速度运行，在这里只发出安静的嘶嘶声。虽然在这种情况下，CPU仍然可以在高时钟速率下连续运行，但由于散热原因，GPU的时钟速度下降得相当快。这在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中得到了说明。尽管如此，游戏仍然是可能的--尽管是在降低的设置下。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 27 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 57 / 58 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte A5 X1 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX | HP Omen 16-b0085ng GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | -1% | 9% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 23 8% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 23 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27 | 23 15% | 34 -26% | 25 7% | 23 15% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 23 21% | 35 -21% | 25 14% | 23 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 34.81 -9% | 36 -13% | 32.2 -1% | 26.4 17% |
| Load Average * | 57 | 35.02 39% | 48 16% | 45.8 20% | 34.25 40% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 52 7% | 46 18% | 58.4 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 58 | 56 3% | 49 16% | 49.1 15% | 58.42 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色区域内。在负载情况下（压力测试，我们的TheWitcher 3测试），笔记本电脑明显发热，但不会过度。在极端情况下，CPU会加热到90°C以上（约194°F）。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 47 °C / 116.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-18.1 °C / -32.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 47 °C / 116.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-18.1 °C / -32.6 F).
| Gigabyte A5 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -16% | -10% | -10% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 48 -2% | 56 -19% | 53.2 -13% | 36 23% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 55 -8% | 49 4% | 58.2 -14% | 38 25% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 33 -22% | 36 -33% | 29.5 -9% | 31 -15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 39 -30% | 28 7% | 31.2 -4% | 33 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU和GPU分别以3.8GHz和约1755MHz的频率完成了压力测试（Prime95和FurMark至少运行了一个小时）。压力测试代表了一种极端情况。通过这个测试，我们检查系统是否在全负荷下保持稳定。
发言人
立体声扬声器产生的声音很好，但缺乏低音。不过，最大音量应该更高。建议使用耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的声音体验。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte A5 X1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理--技嘉笔记本电脑提供了体面的电池寿命
能源消耗
在空闲使用或低负载情况下，A5的能耗对于这里安装的硬件来说是正常的--基于英特尔的竞争产品在某些情况下需要更多的能量。压力测试和我们的"Witcher 3"测试使技嘉笔记本电脑的耗电量分别达到272瓦和平均204瓦。这使它成为我们比较领域内最耗能的设备。由于电池没有耗尽，附带的电源适配器（额定输出：230瓦）似乎有足够的容量。下面的图表说明了笔记本电脑在压力测试和我们的TheWitcher 3测试中的相当稳定的耗电量。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / Watt |
| Idle | 10 / 12 / 16 Watt |
| Load |
124 / 272 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 11% | 13% | 3% | -35% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 12 -20% | 8 20% | 8.8 12% | 10.5 -5% | 15.6 ? -56% | 14.1 ? -41% |
| Idle Average * | 12 | 18 -50% | 12 -0% | 13 -8% | 15 -25% | 20.1 ? -68% | 20.2 ? -68% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16 | 21 -31% | 22 -38% | 14.6 9% | 17 -6% | 29.4 ? -84% | 27.1 ? -69% |
| Load Average * | 124 | 94 24% | 98 21% | 133 -7% | 109 12% | 110.8 ? 11% | 107.6 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 204 | 147 28% | 152 25% | 134 34% | 186 9% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 272 | 199 27% | 162 40% | 164 40% | 186 32% | 214 ? 21% | 259 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 energy consumption
Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø204 (174-220)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø147.3 (143.82-161.2)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø152.5 (149-159)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø133.5 (129-139)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.4 (179.54-206.16)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø198.8 (156.87-216.39)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø164.9 (157-174)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø184.1 (152.85-216.8)
Energy consumption with an external monitor
Gigabyte A5 X1; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø108.1 (103-111)
Gigabyte A5 X1; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø110.8 (105-117)
Gigabyte A5 X1; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø193 (183-203)
Gigabyte A5 X1; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø197.1 (192-213)
电池寿命
在Wi-Fi测试（通过脚本访问网站）和视频测试（短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，全高清）循环运行）中，这台15.6英寸的笔记本电脑分别实现了6：21小时和7：15小时的运行时间。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的节能功能被禁用，显示亮度被设置为约150 cd/m²。此外，在视频测试中，无线模块被禁用。
| Gigabyte A5 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -12% | -11% | -10% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 604 | 547 -9% | 552 -9% | 572 ? -5% | ||
| H.264 | 435 | 325 -25% | 413 -5% | 277 -36% | 459 ? 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 381 | 457 20% | 317 -17% | 340 -11% | 389 2% | 386 ? 1% |
| Load | 77 | 85 10% | 70 -9% | 62 -19% | 81 5% | 85.8 ? 11% |
Pros
+ 240赫兹IPS面板
+ 高系统性能
+ 可容纳两个M.2 SSD（PCIe 4）的空间
+ 可容纳一个2.5英寸存储驱动器的空间
+ 背光键盘(RGB)
+ 可拆卸电池
+ 可靠的电池寿命
Cons
- 低对比度的显示屏
- 稳定性低的盖子
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 没有存储卡读卡器
结论 - A5 X1做了它应该做的事
淘宝网锐真9 5900HX APU和GeForce RTX 3070笔记本电脑GPU（最大TGP：140瓦）将所有最新的游戏流畅地呈现在全高清屏幕上，并提供完整的细节。如果连接一个合适的显示器，超过全高清的分辨率也是可能的。CPU和GPU以持续的高时钟速率运行。
Gigabyte通过A5 X1提供了一个坚实的游戏笔记本电脑。
笔记本电脑在负载下会明显发热，但不会过度。噪音的发展与同类产品一致。笔记本电脑在负载下变得很吵。静音模式 "的能量曲线导致了噪音的显著降低。由此减少的计算能力仍然足够用于游戏--有一些妥协。
稀少的存储容量（512GB）可以通过第二个M.2固态硬盘和/或2.5英寸存储驱动器来扩展。哑光的、视角稳定的显示屏（全高清，IPS，240赫兹）在亮度、色彩还原和色域覆盖方面都有得分。然而，其对比度太低。电池寿命完全没有问题。遗憾的是，电池不能通过USB-C充电。
A5 X1的一个替代品是 HP Omen 16.它提供了一个稍大的显示屏和Thunderbolt 4，但惠普笔记本电脑几乎不能利用大得多的电池（83Wh）的优势。
价格和可用性
在写这篇文章的时候，技嘉A5 X1可以在亚马逊上找到。在我们测试的配置中（Ryzen 9 5900HX,GeForce RTX 3070, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD），，目前的折扣价为1699美元。.
Gigabyte A5 X1
- 01/03/2022 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
