Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 (Clevo V150RND) 评测:配备强大 RTX 4060 的廉价游戏笔记本电脑
在少数几家网上商店,您可以看到 Captiva 的(游戏)笔记本电脑,但这家制造商到底是谁?Captiva 是位于达豪的德国 IT 批发商 Ecom Trading GmbH 的子公司。听起来,他们的大部分笔记本电脑都是在中国生产的。我们以前从未测试过 Captiva 的笔记本电脑,现在是时候测试一下了!
Captiva 笔记本电脑有 17 英寸和 15 英寸两个版本,主要在硬件配置上有所不同。只有 17 英寸版本可选配i9-13900HX- 15 英寸设备只配备i5-13500H安装。此外,我们的测试样本还安装了RTX 4060.您也可以选择配备RTX 407017 英寸版本还可以配备RTX 4080.
我们的配置售价约为 1800 美元。竞争对手包括其他入门级游戏笔记本电脑,如微星 Cyborg 15, 戴尔 G15 5530, 联想Legion Slim 5 16APH8, 联想LOQ 15和 申克 XMG 酷睿 15 M22.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.7 % | 09/2023 | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % | 04/2023 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % | 06/2023 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 26.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.7 % | 08/2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.7 % | 07/2023 | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.9 % | 01/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - Captiva 裸机的秘密 (Clevo)
当我们询问时,Captiva 拒绝告诉我们使用的是哪种裸机--显然它们是 "专为 Captiva "制造的。不过,底部的贴纸向我们揭示了制造商 Clevo 的身份。我们不清楚 Captiva 为何隐瞒这一信息。我们确定 Clevo 裸机是Clevo V150RND.
折叠打开后,笔记本电脑的内壳让人想起技嘉 G5。它的键盘略微凹陷,布局也很相似,但似乎并不完全相同。
从外观上看,这两款机型虽然占地面积相似,但外观却大相径庭。Captiva 笔记本电脑比 G5 厚一些。在顶部,黑色磨砂表面上镶嵌着蓝色的斜向 LED 灯条,其中一角还闪烁着银色的 "Captiva "字样。此外,I74-121 的顶部并不完全平整,而是略有弯曲。
虽然只使用了塑料材料,但其底座仍然足够坚硬,尝试弯曲时也不会发出任何破裂声。我们没有注意到任何不寻常的缝隙,总体来说,它的制造工艺相当不错。
宽大的铰链虽好,但并不出色--它的最大开启角度仅为 135 至 140 度。
由于采用了简约设计,Captiva 笔记本电脑是本次对比中最小的设备之一,尤其是在深度方面。反过来,它也是本次对比中最厚的笔记本电脑之一。制造商称其厚度为 28 毫米,但我们在设备背面的中间边缘测量到的厚度至少为 29 毫米。
它的重量一般--申克和微星的设备稍轻一些,其余的则较重,尤其是戴尔 G15。
连接性 - 略显过时
乍一看,这款笔记本电脑配备了所有最重要的连接选项。再看第二眼,就会发现事实并非如此--至少它们已经过时了。
它的一个 USB-A 端口仍然是 2.0 型,缺少 Thunderbolt 接口,也没有 SD 读卡器。至少,由于配备了 MiniDP 连接,这款笔记本电脑可以使用 VR。两个 USB-A 3.2 端口中,一个速度为 Gen2,另一个只有 Gen1。从外观上无法辨别哪个连接速度更快。
左侧的两个 USB-A 端口靠得很近,这意味着粗大的 USB 记忆棒无法相互连接。所有其他端口之间都有足够的空间。然而,网络连接却在右侧--如果你用右手使用鼠标,这就有点恼人了。
交流
Captiva 笔记本电脑的英特尔 AX211 模块支持 WiFi 6E,这意味着它可以接收和输出 2.4 GHz、6 GHz 和 6GHz 频率。使用 6 GHz 时,其传输速度不错,但使用 5 GHz 时,该笔记本电脑的传输速度在同类产品中是最弱的。
网络摄像头
它的网络摄像头也不完全与时俱进。该笔记本电脑使用的不是现代全高清网络摄像头,而是分辨率为 720p 的过时高清网络摄像头。
它的色彩偏差很低,但即使在光线良好的条件下,画面也很粗糙,无法显示太多细节。
安全
由于采用了英特尔芯片,该设备配备了 TPM 和 Kensington 锁,但与许多游戏笔记本电脑一样,Captiva 设备没有指纹扫描仪。
交货和保修范围
除了笔记本电脑本身和专有电源外,交货范围还包括所有常见的文件、2 个小螺丝和一张驱动程序光盘。后者有点无用,因为笔记本电脑没有光驱--如果能像申克公司随附的驱动程序 U 盘一样,那就更有意义了。
维护
在总共 14 个十字螺丝(幸好大小都一样)中,有一个位于保修封条下方。根据 Captiva 的说法,一旦打开设备,保修期就会终止。制造商允许我们破坏封条。
拧下螺丝后,无需任何工具即可轻松取下底板。在底板下方,你可以看到由两个风扇和大量铜片组成的散热系统、两个内存组(其中一个未占用)、可插拔的固态硬盘以及可插拔的 WiFi 模块。
没有第二个 NVMe 插槽,而是一个可容纳 2.5 英寸硬盘的 SATA 插槽。除了保修封条外,这款笔记本电脑的维护工作也非常简单。
输入设备 - 坚固耐用,适合日常使用
键盘
键盘布局实用,没有任何问题。方向键大小正常(约 15 x 15 毫米),数字键盘的按键较小(15 x 12.6 毫米),并在右侧无缝连接。右上方还有一个电源按钮。
按键的抬起角度舒适而不短,反馈效果也不错。打字时产生的噪音非常适中。此外,按键标签非常清晰,通过单区多色背光,在光线较暗的环境下也能提供支持。
触摸板
由于数字键盘的缘故,触摸板(12 x 7.2 厘米)的位置略微偏左,感觉还不错。在缓慢移动或手心出汗的情况下,触摸板可能会有些粘连,但在正常情况下,手指在触摸板表面上滑动非常顺畅。
集成的按键也有很好的反馈--"咔嗒 "声稍大,但并不令人讨厌。
显示屏 - 高级游戏版仅有全高清显示屏
Captiva 在笔记本电脑中安装了京东方的 144 Hz 全高清面板。我们测试了Gigabyte A5 K1 中的相同面板。这里的显示屏亮度稍高(324 尼特对 281 尼特),但黑色值和对比度稍差。90% 的亮度已经足够。
面板的反应速度很好,我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁,只有少量背光出血,但几乎看不出来。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 989:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.22
ΔE Greyscale 4.81 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 BOE08B3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G15 5530 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 BOE NJ NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) CSOT MNF601CA1-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -34% | 11% | 7% | -36% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 42.3 -34% | 73.1 14% | 69.3 8% | 40.2 -37% | 68.8 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.2 | 62.6 -33% | 98.4 6% | 100 7% | 60.2 -35% | 99.3 7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 43.7 -34% | 74.4 13% | 70 6% | 41.5 -37% | 69.9 6% |
Response Times | -213% | 31% | -59% | -490% | -111% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5 ? | 22 ? -340% | 3.39 ? 32% | 10.7 ? -114% | 42.7 ? -754% | 16 ? -220% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.55 ? | 14 ? -85% | 5.35 ? 29% | 7.8 ? -3% | 24.5 ? -225% | 7.6 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | 21620 ? | |||||
Screen | -19% | -0% | 27% | -14% | -0% | |
Brightness middle | 346 | 247 -29% | 320 -8% | 371.6 7% | 346.2 0% | 378 9% |
Brightness | 324 | 234 -28% | 316 -2% | 343 6% | 329 2% | 371 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 94 4% | 84 -7% | 81 -10% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.25 29% | 0.21 40% | 0.44 -26% | 0.31 11% | 0.33 6% |
Contrast | 989 | 988 0% | 1524 54% | 845 -15% | 1117 13% | 1145 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.12 | 3.78 8% | 4.55 -10% | 1.52 63% | 4.19 -2% | 2.84 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.78 | 6.42 17% | 9.83 -26% | 2.68 66% | 19.19 -147% | 5.51 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.22 | 3.94 -223% | 1.51 -24% | 0.33 73% | 1.66 -36% | 2.75 -125% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.81 | 2.16 55% | 6.2 -29% | 1.2 75% | 2.6 46% | 4.08 15% |
Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.19 100% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 7633 85% | 6906 94% | 6479 100% | 6503 100% | 6749 96% | 5841 111% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -89% /
-50% | 14% /
7% | -8% /
10% | -180% /
-87% | -35% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
京东方面板的色彩空间覆盖率并不高。即使是 sRGB,覆盖率也只有 93%,DisplayP3 和 AdobeRGB 约为 65%。
Ex 工作时,面板的校准不理想,色彩偏差很大。借助 XRite 色彩测量设备和 Calman 软件进行校准后,色彩和灰度 DeltaE 值明显降低。之前的偏差在 4 以上,而校准后的偏差在 1 左右。
如需免费下载校准后的 icc 配置文件,请稍稍向上滚动。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.7 ms rise | |
↘ 3.85 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.422 ms rise | |
↘ 2.578 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在室外,您可以在阴凉处阅读屏幕上的内容。它的磨砂表面可以防止大部分反光,亮度超过 300 尼特,足够使用。不过,您一定要避免阳光直射。
性能 - i5-13500H 配 RTX 4060(140 W)
我们的 15 英寸机型配备了酷睿 i5-13500H和RTX 406016GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,是一款入门级中端游戏笔记本电脑。16:9 的全高清显示屏和相对较低的价格表明,它更适合作为预算设备。
您也可以选择配备RTX 4070而不是 RTX 4060,但只有 17 英寸机型可以选择RTX 4080以及速度更快的英特尔 HX 处理器。
测试条件
Captiva 上安装了控制中心。这里有控制性能、键盘、网络摄像头等的常规设置。有四种性能模式可供选择:性能模式、娱乐模式、省电模式和静音模式。
为了获得最佳的基准测试结果,我们选择了性能模式。
处理器
英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H 是 2023 年 1 月发布的猛禽湖 H 系列中端 CPU。该处理器具有四个性能核心和八个效率核心。由于只有 P 核心支持超线程技术,它们的主频为 2.6 至 4.7 GHz(单核提升,多核提升允许最高主频为 4.6 GHz),因此加起来共有 16 个线程。E 核心的频率为 1.9 至 3.5 GHz。
在我们的 Cinebench R15 循环测试中,它的性能保持非常稳定,我们没有注意到第一次运行后性能有任何下降。
在所有 CPU 测试中,Captiva 中的 i5-13500H 与我们数据库中所有配备相同 CPU 的笔记本电脑相比,性能略高于平均水平。采用 HX CPU 的戴尔 G15 的速度仍然要快一些,但采用当前 AMD CPU 的联想设备在速度上仅略胜一筹。
在电池模式下,TGP 的功耗约为 20 瓦,CPU 性能下降约 50%。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (13542 - 16335, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (1704 - 1799, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5108 - 6212, n=5) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (655 - 687, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (2234 - 2475, n=5) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (243 - 261, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (205 - 263, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (50846 - 58567, n=6) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5500 - 5885, n=6) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (9312 - 11465, n=5) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (1674 - 1762, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=227, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (14.4 - 17.9, n=6) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (44 - 65.5, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=221, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (0.471 - 0.51, n=6) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (11081 - 15390, n=6) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (56813 - 74251, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (2621 - 3623, n=6) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (77835 - 85727, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (7249 - 8086, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (27820 - 38336, n=6) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (62657 - 120493, n=6) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (782 - 992, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5955 - 8495, n=6) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=221, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (20212 - 37618, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
系统性能
Captiva 笔记本电脑的 PCMark 分数符合预期。在 Essentials 子测试中,它甚至名列前茅。反过来,正如 AIDA 所显示的那样,这款笔记本电脑在生产力方面有所下降,这很可能是由于它的内存速度稍慢。总而言之,该设备取得了游戏笔记本电脑的中上水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell G15 5530 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell G15 5530 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7375 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (36916 - 57830, n=6) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (41676 - 65633, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (36826 - 60523, n=6) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (86.2 - 96.1, n=6) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=217, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开多个浏览器标签页或我们的网站时,Captiva 没有出现任何问题,甚至在打开多个标签页时也是如此。第一个小问题出现在打开 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频时。延迟相对较低,除了一个丢帧之外,视频播放非常流畅。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
在大容量存储方面,Captiva 并不示弱。在我们的测试机型中,安装了著名的三星固态硬盘 980,存储容量为 1 TB。它可能还是 PCIe 3.0 时代的产品,但却是最好的型号之一。现在也有一些速度更快的固态硬盘(正如我们的对比所示),但这款存储设备仍然取得了中上水平的成绩。
在 Captiva 中,该固态硬盘的性能比我们数据库中的平均型号(三星 980 1 TB)快约 10%,此外,其性能在较长时间内保持不变,热节流问题也从未出现过。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Captiva 依靠Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060显卡,包括动态升压(Dynamic Boost)在内的最高功率可达 140 瓦。
虽然处理器的性能处于平均水平较低的领域,但这款笔记本电脑的 3DMark 基准测试结果却让它名列前茅--只有戴尔 G15才能跟上。笔记本电脑LOQ 15和Cyborg 15明显落于下风。
离开电源插座后,它的 3D 性能大幅下降。在Fire Strike 测试中,它最初获得了 23,571 分,而现在只获得了 6,693 分。降低了 72%!
3DMark 11 Performance | 30608 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 62668 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23571 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10564 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Captiva 与戴尔 G15在游戏方面的表现也不相上下--后者只是略胜一筹。这很可能是由于它的 CPU 在相应重点的游戏中表现更好。
总的来说,Captiva 可以流畅运行当前几乎所有高分辨率的游戏,其性能略高于我们数据库中所有采用相同 GPU 的笔记本电脑的平均水平。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 - 229, n=30) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
F1 23 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.9 - 132, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (43.8 - 119.9, n=12) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (143.7 - 207, n=12) | |
Average of class Gaming (13.8 - 374, n=35, last 2 years) |
除了常见的昼夜节奏外,《Witcher 3》的帧速率仍然非常稳定。只有戴尔 G15稍快一些。
在运行《Witcher 3 》的一小时基准测试时间内,GPU 的时钟频率始终保持在 2,400 MHz 以上,内存时钟频率始终保持在 2,000 MHz。在此期间,GPU 发热高达 72 °C,功耗约为 95 瓦。
在同一时间内,CPU 的 TDP 降至约 30 瓦,发热温度约为 77 °C。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
娱乐模式下的数值基本相同,甚至没有更安静。
在静音模式下,电脑的运行噪音要小得多(31.43 分贝)。由于风扇不那么活跃,GPU 的温度上升得更快。大约 3.5 分钟后,温度已经达到 87 °C,这导致 GPU 时钟和功耗略有下降。随后温度保持在 89 °C。TGP 从 100 瓦下降到 80 瓦。与此同时,帧速率也从 100 fps 下降到只有大约 85 fps。
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 186.5 | 182.4 | 177.2 | 117 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 367 | 296 | 199 | 101 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 181 | 168.1 | 147.2 | 140.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 185.6 | 148 | 102.2 | 75.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 142.7 | 128.1 | 99.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 175 | 153 | 147 | 138 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 470 | 276 | 219 | 187.9 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 221 | 225 | 184 | 59 |
排放--凉爽但不安静
噪音排放
Witcher 3 全高清超
模式/值 | 噪声排放(分贝) | FPS |
---|---|---|
性能 | 55 | 101 |
娱乐 | 55 | 101 |
静音 | 31.43 | 85(从 100 帧/秒开始缓慢下降) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 25.67 / 25.67 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.52 / 54.17 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Dell G15 5530 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -30% | 5% | 2% | 2% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 27 -17% | 20.41 11% | 22.9 -0% | 23.1 -0% | 23 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 27 -17% | 26.85 -17% | 23.1 -0% | 23.1 -0% | 23 -0% |
Idle Average * | 25.67 | 37.5 -46% | 26.85 -5% | 23.1 10% | 23.1 10% | 23 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.67 | 38 -48% | 26.85 -5% | 27.7 -8% | 25.2 2% | 23 10% |
Load Average * | 38.52 | 56.3 -46% | 27.65 28% | 33.3 14% | 44.3 -15% | 42.41 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.17 | 47.9 12% | 54 -0% | 45.8 15% | 54.71 -1% | |
Load Maximum * | 54.17 | 56.3 -4% | 47.86 12% | 54 -0% | 52 4% | 55.05 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
得益于笔记本电脑大量使用铜材和风扇,这款游戏设备的温度相对较低。即使在满负荷运行一小时后,我们测得的最高温度也只有 42 °C。在这里,戴尔戴尔 G15真正显示出了静音风扇的代价--它的温度超过了 60 °C!
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G15 5530 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -20% | 10% | -1% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 47.5 -16% | 54 -32% | 40.6 1% | 44.4 -8% | 48 -17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 35.5 15% | 62.2 -48% | 42 -0% | 52 -24% | 51 -21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 27.7 13% | 33.4 -4% | 27.8 13% | 28 12% | 28 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 35 | 29.5 16% | 33.4 5% | 26.6 24% | 29.6 15% | 33 6% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在一小时的压力测试中,CPU 时钟频率出奇地保持稳定。平均频率约为 3.1 GHz。CPU 的发热温度约为 72 °C,TDP 始终为 45 瓦。
GPU 的表现同样稳定:其时钟频率为 2,460 MHz,内存时钟频率为 2,000 MHz,平均温度为 69 °C。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3.1 | 2,460 | 72 | 69 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.8 | 2,400 | 77 | 72 |
发言人
Captiva 在前角区域安装了立体声扬声器。扬声器向下辐射,音量可以再大一些,几乎没有低音,其他方面也相当一般。
除了数字端口外,还有两个用于连接其他音频设备的插孔,一个用于连接耳机和耳麦,另一个用于连接麦克风。
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Captiva 的电池容量较小
耗电量
Captiva 笔记本电脑在空闲模式下可以更节俭一些,但就其性能而言,它的耗电量还是比较合理的。戴尔 G15 的游戏性能与 Captiva 差不多,但由于采用了性能更强的 HX 处理器,其耗电量要大得多。
而其他较弱的竞争对手则采用了节流技术,因此在负载情况下要节俭得多。
我们在短时间内测得的最大负载为 219 瓦,230 瓦的电源可以很好地应对。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 18.4 / 20 / 20.7 Watt |
Load |
85 / 219 Watt |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 44% | 9% | 17% | 12% | 9% | 6% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18.4 | 6 67% | 8.4 54% | 9.4 49% | 15 18% | 11.8 36% | 12.8 ? 30% | 13.8 ? 25% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 8.8 56% | 14.98 25% | 15.5 22% | 17.7 11% | 14.7 26% | 16.9 ? 15% | 19.1 ? 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 20.7 | 11.9 43% | 15.56 25% | 24.4 -18% | 21.5 -4% | 15 28% | 21.7 ? -5% | 26.9 ? -30% |
Load Average * | 85 | 89 -5% | 96.8 -14% | 74.1 13% | 73.5 14% | 100 -18% | 96.2 ? -13% | 111 ? -31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 164 | 90.3 45% | 186 -13% | 112.9 31% | 138.6 15% | 184 -12% | ||
Load Maximum * | 219 | 99 55% | 271.42 -24% | 206.5 6% | 176.5 19% | 237 -8% | 212 ? 3% | 251 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
配备 53 瓦时电池的低价 Captiva 并不是最好的;戴尔 G15 使用 86 瓦时电池,申克和联想使用 60 瓦时电池,只有微星 Cyborg 也使用 53 瓦时电池。
随后,在我们的 WLAN 和视频测试中,Captiva 在使用自己的省电模式时仅能坚持不到 5 个小时。
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 50% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 8% | 13% | |
H.264 | 296 | 480 62% | 405 37% | 399 ? 35% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 315 | 452 43% | 391 24% | 425 35% | 441 40% | 465 48% | 369 ? 17% |
Load | 96 | 140 46% | 50 -48% | 70 -27% | 65 -32% | 64 -33% | 84.5 ? -12% |
Reader / Idle | 817 | 699 | 587 | 543 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 47 | 78.5 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 专注于游戏笔记本电脑的基本功能
Captiva Advanced Gaming 可能没有使用最快的处理器,但即便如此,其略高于平均水平的 3D 性能也是毋庸置疑的RTX 4060 。随后,制造商将重点放在了游戏性能上。
1800 美元的价格相对较低,但也不得不做出一些妥协。这包括缺少 Thunderbolt 和 SD 读卡器,以及过时的 USB 2.0 端口。
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 以相对较低的价格提供了相当高的 3D 性能。但在连接选项方面必须做出妥协。
虽然价格低廉,但也有一些可行的替代品。在许多比较中,戴尔戴尔 G15是其最强劲的竞争对手之一。它的 CPU 性能更好,电池容量更大,但反过来却更热,耗电量更高。
价格和供应情况
我们的测试机型售价约为 1 800 美元。目前在美国的任何在线零售商处都买不到这款产品。
您可以在亚马逊上查看类似设备,如戴尔 G15。
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
-
09/22/2023 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.