Notebookcheck Logo
小米 15T 智能手机评测

小米 15T 评测--降价让这款Android 智能手机最划算

最有价值的建议

如果您正在寻找一款外观时尚、性价比高的廉价手机,那么小米 15T 绝对是您的首选。由于价格下降,如果不考虑高端功能,这款功能强大的中端手机几乎可以说是物美价廉。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Wi-Fi 7 Smartphone

判决

小米 15T 在很短的时间内就成为一款真正的性价比爆款。上市仅几周后,近 650 欧元的高零售价就被目前 400 欧元左右的价格所遗忘。作为一款经济实惠的中端智能手机,中国制造商的新 T 机型实际上具备了成为畅销机型的一切条件。

6.83 英寸 120 Hz OLED 面板不仅亮度超高,而且像素密度高、高频 PWM 调光也很人性化。结合整体吸引人的 Dimensity 8400,小米 15T 的电池续航时间也非常吸引人,用户可以长时间使用。徕卡主摄像头也是如此,拍摄出的照片在中端机型中非常可观。

尽管 15T 可能只会更新到Android 19,但小米手机的更新周期还是相当长的。如果你也使用智能手机保护套,你可能会原谅塑料外壳的颜值不足。小米 15T 还缺乏其他高端智能手机功能,如无线充电或快速 USB 端口。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 高频 PWM 调光
+ 防水
+ 良好的中端 SoC
+ 快速充电
+ 吸引人的主摄像头

Cons

- 仅限 uSB 2.0
- 塑料外壳
- 无无线充电功能
- 保修期仅为 12 个月

小米 15T 的价格和上市时间

尽管小米 15T 的基本零售价为 649.90 欧元(约合 750 美元),但其上市后不久的降价幅度非常明显。这款中端智能手机在亚马逊(Amazon.de)等在线零售商或直接从制造商处购买的价格已经在 400 欧元左右。

Amazon Logo
$6.64
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for Xiaomi 15T/Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector Tempered glass film.Anti-Breakage.Anti-Scratch No Bubbles 9H Hardness.Easy Installation for Xiaomi 15T Pro/15T
  • $7.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim,Anti-Scratch (2 +2PACK)
  • $7.59
    Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 15T/15T Pro Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector,Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi 15T Screen Protector

正值圣诞节来临之际,小米再次向市场推出了其升级版 T 系列,该系列历来以高性价比为目标。新款小米 15T 也不例外。

它配备了全新的徕卡摄像头和更强大的 联发科 SoC相比 14T这款中端手机正在争夺价格敏感型买家的青睐。重视变焦照片的用户还可以查看我们的 小米 15T Pro的评测,了解更多信息。

小米 15T 的规格

Xiaomi 15T (15 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 8 x 2.1 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-A725
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.83 inch 19.49:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 479 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 163.2 x 78
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.7, OIS, 1/1.56'', Videos @2160p/​60fps) + 50 MPix (f/​1.9, 2x optical zoom, telephoto) + 12 MPix (f/​2.2, wide angle, FF), Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/​2.2, FF, Videos @2160p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, SIM Eject Tool , HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.99W/​kg Head, 0.99W/​kg Body | GPS: L1+L5, Galileo: E1+E5a, GLONASS: G1, Beidou, NavIC: L5 | BT-Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, fanless, waterproof
Weight
194 g
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 - 防水Android-手机

小米 15T 的颜色
小米 15T 的颜色

小米 15T 采用了前代机型的设计语言。我们的测试样机的金色是新加入的颜色。显示屏增至 6.83 英寸,小米 15T 的重量为 194 克,比 14T 机型略轻。 14T 机型.

这款中端智能手机通过了 IP68 认证,外观时尚,屏占比高达 90% 以上。大猩猩 7i 玻璃可保护 OLED 显示屏免受划伤。

背面由玻璃纤维增强塑料制成,边框也由塑料制成,而不是像上一代产品那样采用铝合金。尽管在手感上略有妥协,但小米 15T 的良好做工还是给人留下了深刻印象。

尺寸比较

163.2 mm 78 mm 7.5 mm 194 g161.2 mm 73 mm 8.2 mm 186 g161.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.4 mm 190 g160.26 mm 74.95 mm 8.12 mm 206 g160.5 mm 75.1 mm 7.8 mm 195 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 仅适用于中端手机的 USB 2.0

小米的 T 机型仍然依赖 USB 2.0 端口,没有图像输出选项。在拷贝测试中,我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 的传输速度仅为 30 MB/s。连接的存储介质可以格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。不过,它支持 USB-OTG,可以顺利连接外部设备。

小米使用 LPDDR5X 作为主内存。不过,内部存储使用的是快速 UFS 4.1 内存。

在连接性方面,小米 15T 已提供蓝牙 6.0,与旧版蓝牙相比,连接性和能效都有所提高。此外,还配备了红外热像仪和 NFC,可实现非接触式支付和控制电视或空调系统。Miracast 可用于无线图像传输。

超宽带(UWB)是一种用于智能标签精确定位的技术,但不包括在内。

顶部(麦克风)
顶部(麦克风)
右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
左侧
左侧
底部(扬声器、USB 端口、红外触发器、SIM 卡插槽)
底部(扬声器、USB 端口、红外触发器、SIM 卡插槽)

软件 - 装有Android 15 的小米智能手机

T 系列在广告中称有四个Android 更新和六年的安全更新。由于小米依赖于Android 15 ex-works,Android 19 应该是路的尽头。400 欧元左右的价格当然不至于让人望而却步,但三星或谷歌在这方面提供了更多的未来保障。

在测试过程中,小米 15T 的操作系统仍然是 HyperOS 2.0,但 HyperOS 3 的重大软件更新已经开始在全球推广。通过测试期间的更新,安全补丁已更新至 2025 年 10 月。

小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测

可持续性

小米 15T 在 EPREL 数据库中的维修等级为 C。这意味着备件供应(理论上)至少在 6 年内受到监管。小米公司没有提供具体机型使用回收材料的信息,只是非常笼统地介绍,也没有披露二氧化碳排放量。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 通话不通过卫星,但没有移动通信

遗憾的是,小米 15T 没有配备现代的 WiFi 7,而只有 WiFi 6E。不过,由于使用了 6 GHz 频段,实际测试中的速度还是非常高的。结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,我们取得了超过 1600 MBit/s 的平均速度,比前代产品略慢。

它还支持当前所有的移动通信标准,包括 5G Sub6 和各种 LTE 频段。这意味着这款中端手机应能在任何地方建立数据连接。

小米 15T 不提供经典的卫星通信,但可以使用该公司自己的 Astral Communication。这样,两台小米设备之间就可以直接连接,而无需激活 Wi-Fi 或手机连接。制造商规定的通话距离可达 1.3 公里。不过,这一功能目前只适用于 T 系列。

Networking
Xiaomi 15T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
909 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 825) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1475 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1558 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼99%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
988 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
812 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼81%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼75%
Xiaomi 14T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
941 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1389 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1352 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
745 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1450 (452-1646)
Xiaomi 14T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1786 (914-1873)
Xiaomi 15T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1556 (1521-1579)
Xiaomi 14T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1556 (1522-1581)
Xiaomi 15T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (474-938)
Xiaomi 14T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø970 (946-993)
Xiaomi 15T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (825-916)
Xiaomi 14T Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (452-922)
楼内定位
楼内定位
户外本地化
户外本地化

小米手机能在户外快速完成 Satfix 定位,精度高达 1 米。在实际测试中,我们将小米 15T 与 Garmin 智能手表(Venu 2)进行了比较。两者都有一些误差,但中端手机的定位功能足以胜任导航任务。

小米 15T 对 Garmin Venu 2
小米 15T 对 Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量 - 小米智能手机支持两个 eSIM 卡

小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测

就小米 15T 所处的价格区间而言,它提供了非常有趣的选择。除了通过两张 nanoSIM 卡实现 5G+5G 双卡双待外,用户还可以在系统中集成两张 eSIM 卡。此外,还可以将两个世界结合起来。

语音质量自然,噪声抑制效果令人满意。除 VoNR 和 VoLTE 外,还支持 VoWiFi。

相机 -Android- 配备徕卡相机的手机

与小米 15T 自拍
与小米 15T 自拍

尽管小米将其 T 系列定位为配备徕卡相机的专业摄影机,但其硬件在很多方面都无法与旗舰竞争机型相提并论。

与照相精英相比,小米 15T 的主摄像头使用的 1/1.55 英寸传感器有些小,这也用于 混合翻盖 2.不过,有了 Light Fusion 800,白天也能拍出不错的照片。图像清晰度高,动态范围大。不过,这款中端智能手机的细节表现并不完美,对比度也略有下降。在弱光环境下,由于缺少传感器,成像质量低和对焦柔和也就不足为奇了。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
60 倍(最大值)
60 倍(最大值)

长焦相机仅有 2 倍光学变焦,在放大 5 倍以内还是有用的,但超过 5 倍后,很快就会变得像素化和人工化。我们还感觉曝光效果不理想。长焦镜头也是如此:它与主摄像头一样缺乏 OIS,但至少有自动对焦功能。

超广角镜头既没有光学防抖功能,也没有自动对焦功能。成像性能尚可,但会出现边缘伪影和模糊现象。

这款中端智能手机最多能以 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清视频。

小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测
小米 15T 智能手机评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angleZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

在可控光照条件下,小米 15T 的色彩还原非常出色。在我们的测量中,色彩比参考值略亮,但 DeltaE 偏差仍明显低于旗舰机型(我们测试的是国行版本)。

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15T: 5.81 ∆E min: 3.14 - max: 8.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.9 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
41 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
55.2 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15T: 35.91 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 55.24 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米手机不含电源适配器

这款中端手机随附一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 TPU 保护套和一个 SIM 卡工具。出厂时还预装了保护膜。配套的快充电源适配器或其他配件可在制造商的网上商店选购。

保修 保修小米 15T 在德国的保修期仅为 12 个月,并可通过内部 Care 保险套餐延长保修期,以防意外损坏和被盗。根据保险范围的不同,测试时的费用在 74 至 104 欧元之间。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的小米 15T

小米 15T 配备的天马触摸屏采样率高达 2,560 Hz。不过,这种高刷新率仅在游戏加速模式下有效。此外,该公司还搭载了自己的湿润触控技术,可以在湿手情况下进行合理操作,在测试中效果良好。

显示屏内的传感器可用于生物识别解锁。在测试中,光学指纹识别工作可靠、快速,但还达不到 小米 17.此外,使用前置摄像头进行 2D 人脸识别也不安全。

小米 15T 的 X 轴振动马达能产生触觉上的振动,传递出一种价值感。

显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕,带直流调光功能

子像素结构
子像素结构

小米中端手机采用分辨率为 1280p 的 AMOLED 面板,色深为 12 位。屏幕对角线为 6.83 英寸,像素密度为 447 ppi。显示屏还可以自动将 120 Hz 的最大帧频调整为 60 Hz 或 90 Hz。

根据数据表,峰值亮度可达 3,200 尼特。对于我们的日常使用场景(APL18 样品),我们很高兴能达到 3,310 cd/m²,甚至超过了制造商的规格。在 HDR 内容下,我们的亮度达到了 3267 cd/m²。因此,小米 15T 非常适合播放高动态范围的视频内容:可支持 HDR10、HDR 10+、Dolby Vision 和 HLG。

按照 OLED 屏幕智能手机的惯例,小米使用 PWM 控制亮度。根据制造商的说法,小米 15T 在高亮度范围内的标准调光方式是直流调光,而在低亮度时则采用高频 PWM 调光(3840 Hz)。根据我们的测量,我们也可以确认后者。

1056
cd/m²
1057
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1056
cd/m²
1070
cd/m²
1123
cd/m²
1051
cd/m²
1072
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1123 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1079.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1070 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6648 K
Xiaomi 15T
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
47%
20%
-26%
25%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1070
1801
68%
1099
3%
1136
6%
1012
-5%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1079
1806
67%
1073
-1%
1132
5%
1016
-6%
Brightness Distribution (%)
94
94
0%
91
-3%
98
4%
95
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
0.8
47%
1.25
17%
3.5
-133%
0.7
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
1.8
54%
1.68
57%
5.5
-41%
1.8
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
1.4
44%
2.4
4%
1.2
52%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.031 108%
2.02 109%
2.19 100%
CCT
6648 98%
6620 98%
6403 102%
6322 103%
6489 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 17.05 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

借助第二代 HyperOS,小米 15T 拥有多种色彩配置文件、白平衡和个别参数调整(如伽玛值)可供选择。通过我们对 小米 1717 Pro升级到 HyperOS 3 后,设置选项应该会有所减少。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪检查了色彩校准。在 "Pro "配置文件中,我们发现与参考色彩的偏差最小,色彩保真度很高。但是 前代在我们的测量中校准效果稍好。

色彩准确度(配置文件:专业、暖色、目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:专业、暖色、目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.56 ms rise
↘ 0.7175 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5685 ms rise
↘ 0.631 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

这款中端手机在户外的可读性没有问题,在阳光直射下也能识别内容。可视角度的稳定性也非常好,不会出现色彩失真。

性能 -Android- 手机采用联发科技术

说到 SoC,小米并没有为其 15T 机型采用最高性能的架子,而是采用了 Dimensity 8400仍是一款适合中端市场的芯片组。A Poco F7 Pro配备了 骁龙 8 代 3比配备 Cortex-A725 内核的小米 15T 快不少,尤其是在单核性能方面。不过,小米手机在人工智能计算方面的表现令人信服。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2118 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2071 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)
1736 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1645 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (1598 - 1645, n=2)
1622 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6839 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (6178 - 6239, n=2)
6209 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
6178 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6127 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)
5076 Points -18%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points -25%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points -28%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1879950 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1784939 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (1474332 - 1695493, n=2)
1584913 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1474332 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1471482 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
19261 Points +39%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17810 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17693 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=188, last 2 years)
14761 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (13832 - 14805, n=2)
14319 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
13832 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9879 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9761 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
9186 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (8278 - 9186, n=2)
8732 Points -5%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=148, last 2 years)
7628 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7178 Points -22%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14640 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11850 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=148, last 2 years)
11351 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
11256 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (8761 - 11256, n=2)
10009 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8213 Points -27%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
12343 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12165 Points +15%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
10601 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (8484 - 10601, n=2)
9543 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=148, last 2 years)
8676 Points -18%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8146 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points -27%
Graphics
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (34498 - 36491, n=2)
35495 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
34498 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
32130 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26528 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
26099 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
25749 Points -25%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1987 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1960 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
1754 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (1731 - 1754, n=2)
1743 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2468, n=148, last 2 years)
1691 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1521 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
63113 Points +28%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points +18%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
49165 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (49010 - 49165, n=2)
49088 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)
19931 Points -59%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17304 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11781 Points -76%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
38828 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
37121 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (29244 - 37121, n=2)
33183 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)
27406 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1206 Points -97%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
998 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
998 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=49, last 2 years)
863 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -68%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
6833 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
6833 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=49, last 2 years)
4046 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
342 Points -95%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288
8965 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
8965 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=49, last 2 years)
5757 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points -88%

用于图形计算的 Mali-G720 MP7处理器。因此,小米手机非常适合中端市场。GPU 的速度非常快,即使是要求苛刻的游戏也不在话下--小米 15T 在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中取得了 25 帧/秒的成绩。与 前代在层级测试中。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4448 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4142 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3943 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4421 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4389 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3954 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
18275 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15464 Points +13%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
13648 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points -21%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8797 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7639 Points +17%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6545 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points -24%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8714 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7716 Points +17%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6598 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points -25%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1944 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1438 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1413 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points -27%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2017 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1513 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1422 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
632 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps -27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps -28%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
441 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
344 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
319 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
255 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps -34%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +7%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps +5%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
111 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
251 fps +21%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
208 fps
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -13%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -25%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps +68%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps +55%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps +14%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
69 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
138 fps +27%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps +8%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
109 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +104%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92 fps +74%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +25%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +23%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +53%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 fps +15%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +42%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps +21%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +11%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
84 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
157 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +8%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
144 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps -2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -8%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps +36%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30 fps +20%
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -4%

浏览器基准测试中低于平均水平的性能与冲浪时令人印象深刻的性能并不匹配。我们无法说明数值较低的原因。

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
268.534 Points +102%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
244.849 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=42, last 2 years)
222 Points +67%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)
132.643 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
132.6 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
119.359 Points -10%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
20.6 runs/min +111%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
18.9 runs/min +94%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)
14.3 runs/min +47%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (9.76 - 11.7, n=2)
10.7 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi 15T
9.76 runs/min
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
6.62 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
188 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
176 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
145.9 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (143 - 144, n=2)
143.5 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)
143 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points -20%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
78009 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
71769 Points +69%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
48597 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (42452 - 47146, n=2)
44799 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)
42452 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms * -94%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1173 ms * -20%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms * -11%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)
976.8 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (883 - 977, n=2)
930 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
510 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
483 ms * +51%

* ... smaller is better

虽然小米 15T 的 UFS 4.1 内存理论上速度非常快,传输速率也很高,但这款中端手机在 AndroBench 中的成绩却出奇地慢。内存控制器 Dimensity 8400的内存控制器可能有限制作用。

Xiaomi 15TXiaomi Poco F7 ProMotorola Edge 60 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 FEXiaomi 14TAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
174%
203%
70%
164%
149%
73%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
1954.45
3930.33
101%
3852.89
97%
3756.44
92%
3605.16
84%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1879.62
3469.2
85%
3842.42
104%
2450.19
30%
3294.31
75%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
278.9
356.12
28%
439.58
58%
382.44
37%
403.97
45%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
89.68
521.5
482%
585.66
553%
198.68
122%
493.57
450%

游戏 - 小米 15T 对游戏玩家来说也很有趣

小米 15T 并不是一款游戏智能手机,但其大屏幕、高分辨率和立体声音效仍能带来非常不错的游戏体验。处理器 Mali-G720 MP7与 Immortalis-G720 不同,Mali-G720 MP7 可能没有光线追踪功能,在我们的测试中只能达到 60 帧/秒。我们通过GameBench软件来确定具体帧率。

小米自己列出了 15T 机型可以达到 120 帧的几款游戏,包括《使命召唤》和《手机传奇》玄心冲击》的稳定显示证实了小米手机的 GPU 性能足以应对当前的游戏。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T; Genshin Impact: Ø59.5 (50-61)
Xiaomi 15T; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (58-61)
Xiaomi 15T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-42)

排放--散热性能良好的小米智能手机

温度

即使在长期负载的情况下,温度变化对小米 15T 来说也不是大问题。在 3DMark 压力测试中,性能保持稳定,仅出现适度节流。我们实现了高达 25% 的 SoC 节流。

Max. Load
 42.6 °C42.8 °C42.3 °C 
 42.1 °C42.8 °C41.5 °C 
 42.2 °C42 °C40.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 42.1 °C
40.3 °C42.5 °C43 °C
39.8 °C42.6 °C43.5 °C
37.4 °C39.8 °C41.4 °C
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
96.3 %
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 % -22%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68.3 % -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -45%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 % -56%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
77.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.2 % -10%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.8 % -30%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 % -46%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94.8 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.4 % -16%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % -30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.8 % -41%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 % -56%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T
Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88.5 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
75.8 % -14%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.7 % -33%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 % -53%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø20.7 (18.7-24.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø16.4 (13.9-25.8)
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.1 (64.2-66.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.8 (47.6-89.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.2 (53-90.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø19.6 (16.4-29.1)
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø19.9 (19.8-20.9)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø18.5 (15.8-28.3)
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.64 (9.3-10.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.81 (8.65-14.5)

发言人

支持杜比音效的立体声扬声器音效不错,但深度不够。粉红噪声也只显示出高音的线性变化。耳机或外置扬声器可通过 USB-C 端口连接。如果你更喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线输出,则有许多音频编解码器和新的 6.0 标准,包括 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.939.22535.438.23127.543.24028.438.85029.841.96323.240.48019.540.110019.441.712520.147.216017.652.320018.455.725015.55831512.762.540011.462.250012.966.763011.767.880011.374.8100012.280.2125013.181.1160015.178.6200013.180.125001382.5315013.385.2400013.379.9500013.379.5630013.678.9800013.678.11000013.678.31250013.774160001466.7SPL25.492.2N0.791.1median 13.3median 78.1Delta1.18.233.239.126.838.223.636.322.333.827.535.120.536.920.738.319.340.315.741.713.652.816.25215.556.915.156.310.958.29.965.212.164.314.16714.27612.979.614.276.912.779.912.779.413.581.713.183.613.18113.48012.778.813.477.113.474.313.160.925.491.40.784.7median 13.4median 761.110hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15TXiaomi 14T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 14T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Android 没有无线充电功能的手机

耗电量

小米 15T 的锂聚合物电池容量为 5,500 毫安时,支持该公司自己的快速充电技术,最大功率可达 67 瓦。不过,在测试中充电过程只用了不到 60 分钟。不支持无线充电。

这款中端手机的功耗效率很高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.2 / 1.26 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 14.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15T
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
6000 mAh
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-48%
-8%
9%
-4%
-7%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.8
0.89
-11%
1.3
-63%
0.87
-9%
0.97
-21%
0.935 ?(0.8 - 1.07, n=2)
-17%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.2
1.13
6%
1.9
-58%
1.48
-23%
1.12
7%
1.245 ?(1.2 - 1.29, n=2)
-4%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.26
1.18
6%
2.4
-90%
1.52
-21%
1.19
6%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.8
8.59
-26%
8.6
-26%
6.76
1%
4.13
39%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
14.32
15.81
-10%
14.9
-4%
12.89
10%
12.25
14%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.71 (1.257-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.7 (1.077-16.6)
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.965-1.329)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.4 (11.3-14.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.5 (6.73-15.5)
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.965-1.329)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)

电池寿命

小米 15T 的电池续航时间处于良好水平。将显示屏亮度设为 150 cd/m²,可以进行最佳比较。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,小米手机的续航时间超过了 17 小时,与前代产品一样长。在 专业版但在 Pro 机型上,15T 的续航时间缩短了近 4 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)
17h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 27min
Xiaomi 15T
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
6000 mAh
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Battery runtime
27%
30%
-22%
-7%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
17.2
21.8
27%
22.4
30%
15.1
-12%
18.2
6%
Load (h)
4.5
3.1
-31%
3.6
-20%
Reader / Idle (h)
40.6
33.6
H.264 (h)
25.1
21.9

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 15T 的大幅降价使得这款中端手机在 400 欧元左右的价格区间成为一个非常有趣的选择,其整体配置非常出色。

Xiaomi 15T - 11/17/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 74%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
42 / 55 → 76%
Application Performance
67 / 85 → 79%
AI Performance
74%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
82%
Average
71%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
97.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 56.9%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84.8%
Xiaomi 15T
Xiaomi 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.64
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S...
3. $7.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1...
List Price: 650€
194 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
2.
84%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $579.99
XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
2. $345.00
Xiaomi Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
3. $11.99
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
List Price: 650 Euro
206 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
AMOLED
3.
81.5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60...
2. $6.98
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
3. $8.88
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr...
List Price: 600 Euro
186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
P-OLED
4.
85.6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto...
2. $3.99
Wiaocit 3 Pack Tempered Glas...
3. $579.99
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 5G (Fa...
List Price: 809€
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
382 PPI
AMOLED
5.
83.4%
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
2. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $5.59
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w...
195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 15T 评测--降价让这款Android 智能手机最划算
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-11-22 (Update: 2025-11-22)