判决
小米 15T 在很短的时间内就成为一款真正的性价比爆款。上市仅几周后,近 650 欧元的高零售价就被目前 400 欧元左右的价格所遗忘。作为一款经济实惠的中端智能手机,中国制造商的新 T 机型实际上具备了成为畅销机型的一切条件。
6.83 英寸 120 Hz OLED 面板不仅亮度超高,而且像素密度高、高频 PWM 调光也很人性化。结合整体吸引人的 Dimensity 8400,小米 15T 的电池续航时间也非常吸引人,用户可以长时间使用。徕卡主摄像头也是如此,拍摄出的照片在中端机型中非常可观。
尽管 15T 可能只会更新到Android 19,但小米手机的更新周期还是相当长的。如果你也使用智能手机保护套,你可能会原谅塑料外壳的颜值不足。小米 15T 还缺乏其他高端智能手机功能,如无线充电或快速 USB 端口。
Pros
Cons
小米 15T 的价格和上市时间
尽管小米 15T 的基本零售价为 649.90 欧元(约合 750 美元),但其上市后不久的降价幅度非常明显。这款中端智能手机在亚马逊(Amazon.de)等在线零售商或直接从制造商处购买的价格已经在 400 欧元左右。
Table of Contents
- 判决
- 小米 15T 的规格
- 保护套 - 防水Android-手机
- 功能 - 仅适用于中端手机的 USB 2.0
- 软件 - 装有Android 15 的小米智能手机
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 通话不通过卫星,但没有移动通信
- 电话功能和语音质量 - 小米智能手机支持两个 eSIM 卡
- 相机 -Android- 配备徕卡相机的手机
- 配件和保修 - 小米手机不含电源适配器
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的小米 15T
- 显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕,带直流调光功能
- 性能 -Android- 手机采用联发科技术
- 游戏 - 小米 15T 对游戏玩家来说也很有趣
- 排放--散热性能良好的小米智能手机
- 电池续航时间 -Android 没有无线充电功能的手机
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可比较的替代品
正值圣诞节来临之际,小米再次向市场推出了其升级版 T 系列,该系列历来以高性价比为目标。新款小米 15T 也不例外。
它配备了全新的徕卡摄像头和更强大的 联发科 SoC相比 14T这款中端手机正在争夺价格敏感型买家的青睐。重视变焦照片的用户还可以查看我们的 小米 15T Pro的评测,了解更多信息。
小米 15T 的规格
保护套 - 防水Android-手机
小米 15T 采用了前代机型的设计语言。我们的测试样机的金色是新加入的颜色。显示屏增至 6.83 英寸,小米 15T 的重量为 194 克,比 14T 机型略轻。 14T 机型.
这款中端智能手机通过了 IP68 认证,外观时尚,屏占比高达 90% 以上。大猩猩 7i 玻璃可保护 OLED 显示屏免受划伤。
背面由玻璃纤维增强塑料制成,边框也由塑料制成,而不是像上一代产品那样采用铝合金。尽管在手感上略有妥协,但小米 15T 的良好做工还是给人留下了深刻印象。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 仅适用于中端手机的 USB 2.0
小米的 T 机型仍然依赖 USB 2.0 端口,没有图像输出选项。在拷贝测试中,我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 的传输速度仅为 30 MB/s。连接的存储介质可以格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。不过,它支持 USB-OTG,可以顺利连接外部设备。
小米使用 LPDDR5X 作为主内存。不过,内部存储使用的是快速 UFS 4.1 内存。
在连接性方面,小米 15T 已提供蓝牙 6.0,与旧版蓝牙相比,连接性和能效都有所提高。此外,还配备了红外热像仪和 NFC,可实现非接触式支付和控制电视或空调系统。Miracast 可用于无线图像传输。
超宽带(UWB)是一种用于智能标签精确定位的技术,但不包括在内。
软件 - 装有Android 15 的小米智能手机
可持续性
小米 15T 在 EPREL 数据库中的维修等级为 C。这意味着备件供应(理论上)至少在 6 年内受到监管。小米公司没有提供具体机型使用回收材料的信息,只是非常笼统地介绍,也没有披露二氧化碳排放量。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 通话不通过卫星,但没有移动通信
遗憾的是,小米 15T 没有配备现代的 WiFi 7,而只有 WiFi 6E。不过,由于使用了 6 GHz 频段,实际测试中的速度还是非常高的。结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,我们取得了超过 1600 MBit/s 的平均速度,比前代产品略慢。
它还支持当前所有的移动通信标准,包括 5G Sub6 和各种 LTE 频段。这意味着这款中端手机应能在任何地方建立数据连接。
小米 15T 不提供经典的卫星通信,但可以使用该公司自己的 Astral Communication。这样,两台小米设备之间就可以直接连接,而无需激活 Wi-Fi 或手机连接。制造商规定的通话距离可达 1.3 公里。不过,这一功能目前只适用于 T 系列。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量 - 小米智能手机支持两个 eSIM 卡
相机 -Android- 配备徕卡相机的手机
尽管小米将其 T 系列定位为配备徕卡相机的专业摄影机,但其硬件在很多方面都无法与旗舰竞争机型相提并论。
与照相精英相比,小米 15T 的主摄像头使用的 1/1.55 英寸传感器有些小,这也用于 混合翻盖 2.不过,有了 Light Fusion 800,白天也能拍出不错的照片。图像清晰度高,动态范围大。不过,这款中端智能手机的细节表现并不完美,对比度也略有下降。在弱光环境下,由于缺少传感器,成像质量低和对焦柔和也就不足为奇了。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angleZoom 5x在可控光照条件下,小米 15T 的色彩还原非常出色。在我们的测量中,色彩比参考值略亮,但 DeltaE 偏差仍明显低于旗舰机型(我们测试的是国行版本)。


配件和保修 - 小米手机不含电源适配器
这款中端手机随附一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 TPU 保护套和一个 SIM 卡工具。出厂时还预装了保护膜。配套的快充电源适配器或其他配件可在制造商的网上商店选购。
保修 保修小米 15T 在德国的保修期仅为 12 个月,并可通过内部 Care 保险套餐延长保修期,以防意外损坏和被盗。根据保险范围的不同,测试时的费用在 74 至 104 欧元之间。
输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的小米 15T
小米 15T 配备的天马触摸屏采样率高达 2,560 Hz。不过,这种高刷新率仅在游戏加速模式下有效。此外,该公司还搭载了自己的湿润触控技术,可以在湿手情况下进行合理操作,在测试中效果良好。
显示屏内的传感器可用于生物识别解锁。在测试中,光学指纹识别工作可靠、快速,但还达不到 小米 17.此外,使用前置摄像头进行 2D 人脸识别也不安全。
小米 15T 的 X 轴振动马达能产生触觉上的振动,传递出一种价值感。
显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕,带直流调光功能
小米中端手机采用分辨率为 1280p 的 AMOLED 面板,色深为 12 位。屏幕对角线为 6.83 英寸,像素密度为 447 ppi。显示屏还可以自动将 120 Hz 的最大帧频调整为 60 Hz 或 90 Hz。
根据数据表,峰值亮度可达 3,200 尼特。对于我们的日常使用场景(APL18 样品),我们很高兴能达到 3,310 cd/m²,甚至超过了制造商的规格。在 HDR 内容下,我们的亮度达到了 3267 cd/m²。因此,小米 15T 非常适合播放高动态范围的视频内容:可支持 HDR10、HDR 10+、Dolby Vision 和 HLG。
按照 OLED 屏幕智能手机的惯例,小米使用 PWM 控制亮度。根据制造商的说法,小米 15T 在高亮度范围内的标准调光方式是直流调光,而在低亮度时则采用高频 PWM 调光(3840 Hz)。根据我们的测量,我们也可以确认后者。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1070 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6648 K
| Xiaomi 15T AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 60 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi 14T AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 47% | 20% | -26% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1070 | 1801 68% | 1099 3% | 1136 6% | 1012 -5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1079 | 1806 67% | 1073 -1% | 1132 5% | 1016 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 94 0% | 91 -3% | 98 4% | 95 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 0.8 47% | 1.25 17% | 3.5 -133% | 0.7 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 1.8 54% | 1.68 57% | 5.5 -41% | 1.8 54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.3 48% | 1.4 44% | 2.4 4% | 1.2 52% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.031 108% | 2.02 109% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6648 98% | 6620 98% | 6403 102% | 6322 103% | 6489 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 17.05 % Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.56 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.7175 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5685 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.631 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
性能 -Android- 手机采用联发科技术
说到 SoC,小米并没有为其 15T 机型采用最高性能的架子,而是采用了 Dimensity 8400仍是一款适合中端市场的芯片组。A Poco F7 Pro配备了 骁龙 8 代 3比配备 Cortex-A725 内核的小米 15T 快不少,尤其是在单核性能方面。不过,小米手机在人工智能计算方面的表现令人信服。
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (49010 - 49165, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (29244 - 37121, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
用于图形计算的 Mali-G720 MP7处理器。因此,小米手机非常适合中端市场。GPU 的速度非常快,即使是要求苛刻的游戏也不在话下--小米 15T 在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中取得了 25 帧/秒的成绩。与 前代在层级测试中。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
浏览器基准测试中低于平均水平的性能与冲浪时令人印象深刻的性能并不匹配。我们无法说明数值较低的原因。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (9.76 - 11.7, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (143 - 144, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (42452 - 47146, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (883 - 977, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
* ... smaller is better
虽然小米 15T 的 UFS 4.1 内存理论上速度非常快,传输速率也很高,但这款中端手机在 AndroBench 中的成绩却出奇地慢。内存控制器 Dimensity 8400的内存控制器可能有限制作用。
| Xiaomi 15T | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | Motorola Edge 60 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Xiaomi 14T | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 174% | 203% | 70% | 164% | 149% | 73% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1954.45 | 3930.33 101% | 3852.89 97% | 3756.44 92% | 3605.16 84% | 3809 ? 95% | 2222 ? 14% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1879.62 | 3469.2 85% | 3842.42 104% | 2450.19 30% | 3294.31 75% | 3258 ? 73% | 1838 ? -2% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 278.9 | 356.12 28% | 439.58 58% | 382.44 37% | 403.97 45% | 380 ? 36% | 295 ? 6% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 89.68 | 521.5 482% | 585.66 553% | 198.68 122% | 493.57 450% | 439 ? 390% | 336 ? 275% |
游戏 - 小米 15T 对游戏玩家来说也很有趣
小米 15T 并不是一款游戏智能手机,但其大屏幕、高分辨率和立体声音效仍能带来非常不错的游戏体验。处理器 Mali-G720 MP7与 Immortalis-G720 不同,Mali-G720 MP7 可能没有光线追踪功能,在我们的测试中只能达到 60 帧/秒。我们通过GameBench软件来确定具体帧率。
小米自己列出了 15T 机型可以达到 120 帧的几款游戏,包括《使命召唤》和《手机传奇》。玄心冲击》的稳定显示证实了小米手机的 GPU 性能足以应对当前的游戏。
排放--散热性能良好的小米智能手机
温度
即使在长期负载的情况下,温度变化对小米 15T 来说也不是大问题。在 3DMark 压力测试中,性能保持稳定,仅出现适度节流。我们实现了高达 25% 的 SoC 节流。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 14T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
发言人
支持杜比音效的立体声扬声器音效不错,但深度不够。粉红噪声也只显示出高音的线性变化。耳机或外置扬声器可通过 USB-C 端口连接。如果你更喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线输出,则有许多音频编解码器和新的 6.0 标准,包括 Auracast。
Xiaomi 15T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 14T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Android 没有无线充电功能的手机
耗电量
小米 15T 的锂聚合物电池容量为 5,500 毫安时,支持该公司自己的快速充电技术,最大功率可达 67 瓦。不过,在测试中充电过程只用了不到 60 分钟。不支持无线充电。
这款中端手机的功耗效率很高。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 6000 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 14T 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -48% | -8% | 9% | -4% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.8 | 0.89 -11% | 1.3 -63% | 0.87 -9% | 0.97 -21% | 0.935 ? -17% | 0.847 ? -6% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.2 | 1.13 6% | 1.9 -58% | 1.48 -23% | 1.12 7% | 1.245 ? -4% | 1.431 ? -19% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.26 | 1.18 6% | 2.4 -90% | 1.52 -21% | 1.19 6% | 1.31 ? -4% | 1.61 ? -28% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.8 | 8.59 -26% | 8.6 -26% | 6.76 1% | 4.13 39% | 6.47 ? 5% | 7.09 ? -4% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 14.32 | 15.81 -10% | 14.9 -4% | 12.89 10% | 12.25 14% | 14.1 ? 2% | 11.2 ? 22% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
小米 15T 的电池续航时间处于良好水平。将显示屏亮度设为 150 cd/m²,可以进行最佳比较。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,小米手机的续航时间超过了 17 小时,与前代产品一样长。在 专业版但在 Pro 机型上,15T 的续航时间缩短了近 4 个小时。
| Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 6000 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 14T 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 27% | 30% | -22% | -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 17.2 | 21.8 27% | 22.4 30% | 15.1 -12% | 18.2 6% |
| Load (h) | 4.5 | 3.1 -31% | 3.6 -20% | ||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 40.6 | 33.6 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 25.1 | 21.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 15T 的大幅降价使得这款中端手机在 400 欧元左右的价格区间成为一个非常有趣的选择,其整体配置非常出色。
Xiaomi 15T
- 11/17/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.64 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 2. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S... 3. $7.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1... List Price: 650€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $579.99 XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $345.00 Xiaomi Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 3. $11.99 Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 P... List Price: 650 Euro | 206 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.67" 3200x1440 526 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60... 2. $6.98 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 3. $8.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr... List Price: 600 Euro | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto... 2. $3.99 Wiaocit 3 Pack Tempered Glas... 3. $579.99 Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 5G (Fa... List Price: 809€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... 2. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $5.59 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w... | 195 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































































