Xiaomi Poco X8 智能手机评测 – 可能是 2026 年续航和屏幕表现最超值的手机

Name: Xiaomi Poco X8
Brand: Xiaomi

好用又实惠？

凭借 Poco X8，Xiaomi 再次推出了一款超值中端机，其明亮的 120Hz AMOLED 显示屏、大容量电池和快速充电令人印象深刻。但在其他方面，削减成本的痕迹显而易见——而竞争对手也没有停下脚步...
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/17/2026 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...
5G Android ARM Review Snippet Smartphone

Xiaomi Poco X8 评测结论

Poco X8 在我们的评测中给人的印象颇为复杂：凭借出色的耐用性，包括 IP69K 认证、TÜV 和 SGS 的多项认证，以及极佳的续航表现，这款 2026 年机型明确将自身定位为时尚的户外伴侣。再加上亮度极高的 AMOLED 屏幕，这款 Xiaomi 手机拥有一些强有力的卖点——但在性能方面则不得不接受一些妥协。

Xiaomi 也不得不在主摄像头上削减成本：成像质量不佳，尤其是在弱光环境下。

另一方面，长期更新支持在中端机型中仍未普及。Xiaomi 在这方面表现出色，同时还提供了较为全面的蜂窝网络频段支持，便于在国际旅行时使用。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

外壳大量使用塑料是否合意因人而异，而与竞品相比，性能有限和网速较慢也可能成为问题。

另外值得一提的是：Xiaomi Poco X8 与 Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 非常相似，但提供不同的存储配置，且 RAM 更大。它还缺少广角摄像头和 eSIM 支持。不过，我们评测的这款机型比 Redmi 手机便宜得多。

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏

+ 超长续航

+ 67 瓦快速充电

+ 坚固耐用，具备 IP69K 防护等级

+ 六年安全更新

+ 价格实惠

Cons

- 性能不佳

- 弱光下相机画质不佳

- 无超广角摄像头

- Wi-Fi 和 USB 速度慢

- 不支持 eSIM，无 microSD 卡槽

- 操作系统中有广告

- PWM 频闪

价格和供货情况

Xiaomi Poco X8 现已上市，售价略低于 340 美元。

$349.99
XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 8GB) 6.59" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2511FPC34G Liberado (Black)
$517.99
XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO MAX 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) 6.83" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2602BPC18G Liberado (Black)
$384.00
XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 8GB) 6.59" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2511FPC34G Liberado (White)

Xiaomi Poco X8 评测结论
规格
机身 – 坚固的 Xiaomi 手机采用大量塑料材质
功能 – 配备最高 12 GB RAM 的 Poco 手机
软件 – 为价格亲民的中端手机提供长期更新
通信与 GNSS – 不支持 WiFi 7 的 Xiaomi 智能手机
电话功能与通话质量 – Poco X8 不支持 eSIM
摄像头 – 这款中端手机缺少广角摄像头
配件与保修 – Poco 在欧洲不附带电源适配器
输入设备与操作 – 配备指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机
显示屏 – 中端手机搭载支持 DC 调光的超高亮度 OLED 屏幕
性能 – Poco X8 是一款价格亲民的旗舰杀手吗？
排放 – Poco X8 在负载下几乎不降频
续航时间 – 配备大容量电池的平价 Android 手机
Notebookcheck 综合评分
可选替代方案对比

规格

Xiaomi Poco X8 (Poco X8 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 8c/8t, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78/A55

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 710

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.83 inch 19.4:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 213 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: compass, light, proximity, gyroscope

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66/B71), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n77/n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.5 x 78.3

Battery

8340 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67 Watt charging, 22.5 Watt wired reverse charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase shift AF, OIS, Dual LED flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth sensor (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB-C cable, SIM tool, bumper, 12 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69K certified, , fanless, waterproof

Weight

223 g

Price

320 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身 – 坚固的 Xiaomi 手机采用大量塑料材质

这款 Poco 手机采用相当经典的圆角设计。我们评测机的白色背部在透明塑料层下呈现出多种纹理，螺丝也清晰可见。其他深灰色和橙色版本则以稍显内敛的方式诠释了这种工业风格。

Poco X8 具备 IP68 和 IP69K 防护等级。TÜV SÜD 认证其可在最深两米的水下防水 72 小时，此外还获得了 SGS 认证，据称可承受从最高三米处跌落至花岗岩表面。

据制造商称，电池也在实验室中经受了极端条件测试，温度范围从零下 40 摄氏度到零上 75 摄氏度。

尺寸对比

Nothing Phone (4b) Xiaomi Poco X8 Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Motorola Moto G77 Xiaomi Poco X7 DIN A6 ❌

功能 – 配备最高 12 GB RAM 的 Poco 手机

这款手机提供 8 GB 或 12 GB 内存可选，均搭配 256 GB UFS 3.1 存储空间。不配备 microSD 读卡器。

其余配置符合这一价位的预期：配备电子罗盘、NFC、红外发射器，并支持 USB OTG。

既不提供支持有线视频输出的高速 USB 3 接口，也不支持 WiFi 7。可通过 Miracast 进行无线投屏。有线数据传输速度较慢。

软件 – 为价格亲民的中端手机提供长期更新

该设备预装了 Android 16。测试时，安全补丁为 2026 年 8 月版本，因此仍算比较新。

根据 Xiaomi Security Center 的信息，预计该设备大约每三个月会收到一次更新，直至 2032 年，也就是自发布起六年。此外，官方还承诺提供五个 Android 大版本更新，最高升级至 Android 21。

遗憾的是，操作系统中仍不断出现广告。

可持续性

Xiaomi 未提供关于其环境足迹的可靠数据。该制造商仅提及其 ESG 措施——无塑料包装、CO₂ 排放更低的铁路和海运运输，以及自助维修计划。

通信与 GNSS – 不支持 WiFi 7 的 Xiaomi 智能手机

Xiaomi 未提供支持 6 GHz 频段的高速 WiFi，仅配备采用基础天线配置的 WiFi 5，因此速度只能达到约 350 MBit/s。一些价位相近的竞品在这方面明显更快。

该手机支持 5G 以及多个 LTE 频段，因此也非常适合旅行时使用。在我们的测试中，信号接收表现良好，但在复杂环境下并非始终完全稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco X8 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	335 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	353 (min: 314) MBit/s ∼20%
Xiaomi Poco X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼55%
Nothing Phone (4b) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	509 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	435 (min: 391) MBit/s ∼25%
Motorola Moto G77 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	279 (min: 169) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	342 (min: 251) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	362 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	340 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼19%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	343 (min: 304) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	350 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼20%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	655 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	689 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1615 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1763 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco X8; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø335 (305-351) MBit/s

Xiaomi Poco X8; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø353 (314-380) MBit/s

在卫星定位方面，Poco X8 采用单频 GNSS，在户外能快速定位，精度约为三米。

在与 Garmin Venu 2 的实际对比测试中，这款 Xiaomi 手机的定位准确度尚可，但始终与实际行进路线略有偏差。不过，偏差仍在可接受范围内。

因此，这款中端智能手机适合用于导航。

电话功能与通话质量 – Poco X8 不支持 eSIM

Poco X8 支持双 SIM 卡，可使用两张 nanoSIM 卡；不支持 eSIM。

还支持 VoLTE、VoNR 和 VoWiFi。

通话质量良好，听筒音量始终足够大，能够清晰听到对方的声音。

摄像头 – 这款中端手机缺少广角摄像头

Xiaomi 在摄像头配置上有所缩水：前代机型还配有广角和微距摄像头，如今背面却只剩一颗 5000 万像素主摄和一颗无法独立拍照的小型景深传感器。

Poco X8 在光线充足时能拍出不错的照片，但清晰度往往不够理想，明亮区域也很容易过曝。在弱光环境下，有限的动态范围在画面的亮部和暗部表现得尤为明显。如果没有额外光源，几乎无法拍照。

前置摄像头的自拍效果尚可，但在明亮背景下，主体边缘会出现略显不自然的光晕。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Pflanze Umgebung Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修 – Poco 在欧洲不附带电源适配器

在欧洲，包装盒内附有一根 USB-C 数据线、一枚 SIM 卡取卡针和一个保护壳。在其他地区，还附带一个兼容的充电器。

遗憾的是，欧洲销售的 Xiaomi 手机仅提供 12 个月的保修。

输入设备与操作 – 配备指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机

240 Hz 的触控采样率让这款 Poco 手机能够快速响应触控操作。在游戏中，采样率还可以进一步提高。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕下方，位置相当靠下，但完成初始设置后，它能相当可靠地解锁手机，也可用于控制对其他应用的访问。

此外，手机还支持面部识别。在我们的测试中，即使光线较暗，它也能可靠地工作。不过，由于它仅依靠前置摄像头进行 2D 识别，安全性略逊一筹。

显示屏 – 中端手机搭载支持 DC 调光的超高亮度 OLED 屏幕

屏幕是 Poco X8 整机最突出的卖点之一：这块 OLED 面板的刷新率最高可达 120 Hz，在贴近实际使用场景的 APL 测试中，亮度达到约 1,000 cd/m2——这为在阳光下的户外使用带来了切实的优势。

这款 Xiaomi 智能手机在护眼方面也表现领先。除了约 125 Hz 的常规 PWM 频闪外，它还采用了 Xiaomi 宣传的最高 3,840 Hz 高频 PWM 调光。不过，对频闪敏感的用户仍应注意其中 120 Hz 的低频分量——在这一频率下，长时间使用仍可能导致眼睛灼热或头痛。

作为对比：在我们测试过的所有设备中，略多于一半完全不使用 PWM 调光；而采用 PWM 调光的设备，其平均频率也明显更高。


1019 cd/m²	1021 cd/m²	999 cd/m²
1038 cd/m²	1019 cd/m²	1008 cd/m²
1116 cd/m²	1007 cd/m²	1022 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1116 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1027.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1019 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.59 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
134.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
CCT: 6916 K

	Xiaomi Poco X8 AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco X7 AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Nothing Phone (4b) Super AMOLED, 2344x1080, 6.8"	Motorola Moto G77 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Display		-57%	-74%	-14%	1%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	4009	1156 -71%	1160 -71%	3521 -12%	4034 1%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	4421	2563 -42%	1030 -77%	3704 -16%	4440 0%
Response Times		-56%	-29%	-34%	-49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)	1.44 ?(0.7075, 0.7315) -80%	0.95 ?(0.46, 0.491) -19%	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) -100%	1.6 ?(0.782, 0.8195) -100%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)	1.6 ?(0.877, 0.7265) -100%	1.28 ?(0.6045, 0.678) -60%	1.1 ?(0.5, 0.6) -38%	1.3 ?(0.667, 0.632) -63%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	125.3	120	480	103	120
PWM Amplitude * (%)	16	14.08 12%	17.34 -8%	10 37%	13.42 16%
Screen		31%	7%	47%	5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1019	1156 13%	1148 13%	1558 53%	1053 3%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1028	1150 12%		1526 48%	1063 3%
Brightness Distribution (%)	90	98 9%		96 7%	98 9%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.59	1.1 69%	1.9 47%	0.79 78%	2.9 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.86	3.1 55%	4.7 31%	2.97 57%	4.9 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.6 27%	3.6 -64%	1.3 41%	3 -36%
Gamma	2.249 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6916 ^94%	6304 ^103%	6856 ^95%	6489 ^100%	6747 ^96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-27% / -9%	-32% / -23%	-0% / 14%	-14% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

125.3 Hz
Amplitude: 16 %

The display backlight flickers at 125.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 125.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7579 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下进行的一系列测量（尽管最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平的，但这是由坐标轴缩放比例造成的。信息框显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）

尽管可以通过设置进行一些调整，但在日常使用中，你还是得接受轻微的色彩差异。不过，这些几乎察觉不到的差异可能主要会困扰专业人士。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4 ms rise
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4 ms rise
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

性能 – Poco X8 是一款价格亲民的旗舰杀手吗？

尽管采用了新的 SoC，我们仍未发现其性能较前代有任何提升；真要说的话，情况反而相反：Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 性能不足，但仍能较好地跟上许多同价位手机的步伐。

Poco X8 在日常使用中并非完全没有卡顿，尤其是在处理稍有难度的任务或多任务操作时，这款手机很快就显得力不从心。

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (514 - 4055, n=41, last 2 years)	1568 Points +78%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	983 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	883 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (881 - 883, n=2)	882 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	881 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 11622, n=41, last 2 years)	5435 Points +103%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3163 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	2680 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (2622 - 2680, n=2)	2651 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	2622 Points -2%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=186, last 2 years)	1861 Points +93%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1088 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1030 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	1012 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (964 - 1014, n=3)	997 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	964 Points
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	802 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=186, last 2 years)	5651 Points +106%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3169 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2908 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	2898 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (2748 - 2930, n=3)	2859 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	2748 Points
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	2022 Points -26%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=129, last 2 years)	14893 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	13406 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (11939 - 14722, n=3)	12885 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	11993 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	11939 Points

Antutu v11 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=46, last 2 years)	2413796 Points +194%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	948782 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	848400 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (822196 - 848400, n=3)	831206 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	822196 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=105, last 2 years)	1230 Points +41%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	873 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	759 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (610 - 873, n=2)	742 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	502 Points -42%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=111, last 2 years)	7917 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	4891 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4611 - 4891, n=3)	4738 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	4725 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	4611 Points -6%
System
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=111, last 2 years)	11496 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	9076 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	9004 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (8570 - 9076, n=3)	8883 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8774 Points -3%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=111, last 2 years)	9351 Points +43%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	6540 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (5133 - 6540, n=3)	5827 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	5133 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	4732 Points -28%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=111, last 2 years)	24556 Points +256%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8570 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	6902 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (6753 - 6913, n=3)	6856 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	6753 Points -2%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=111, last 2 years)	1734 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	1408 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1401 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (1343 - 1431, n=3)	1394 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	1343 Points -5%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=97, last 2 years)	18833 Points +141%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	8359 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (7819 - 8777, n=3)	8176 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	7933 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	7819 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=65, last 2 years)	14242 Points +2499%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	567 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (548 - 567, n=3)	558 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	548 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 6997, n=135, last 2 years)	539 Points +291%
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	230 Points +67%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	217 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	138 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	134 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (123 - 138, n=3)	131.7 Points -5%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 55067, n=135, last 2 years)	1757 Points +1173%
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	330 Points +139%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	218 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	148 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	138 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (122 - 148, n=3)	136 Points -1%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 71367, n=135, last 2 years)	2664 Points +580%
Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	500 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	392 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	390 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (346 - 392, n=3)	376 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	203 Points -48%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=16, last 2 years)	393 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	88.8 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=77, last 2 years)	6143 Points +1826%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (311 - 337, n=3)	322 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 8192	319 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	311 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	234 Points -27%

Poco X8 在图形基准测试中的表现同样不突出。大多数游戏应该都能在这款手机上运行，但玩起配置要求较高的游戏时，体验就不那么畅快了。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	957 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	842 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	759 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	741 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	382 Points -50%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	960 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	846 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	765 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	744 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	386 Points -50%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3770 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3129 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2977 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2941 Points
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1377 Points -53%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	346 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	353 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	344 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	115 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps +22%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps -11%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.6 fps -34%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +50%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.9 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps +105%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	12 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +42%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -55%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.8 fps +44%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.5 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.7 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.4 fps
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2.5 fps -54%

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	156.129 Points
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=114, last 2 years)	154.1 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (4b) (Chrome 153)	147.238 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (118.3 - 156.1, n=3)	131.3 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	119.362 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G77 (Chrome 145)	98.2 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	87.225 Points -44%
2.2 Total
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=105, last 2 years)	204 Points +41%
Nothing Phone (4b) (Chrome 153)	170.221 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	145.019 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (126.5 - 145, n=3)	134.3 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	126.463 Points -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=71, last 2 years)	223 runs/min +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	136 runs/min +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (94.6 - 136, n=3)	114.5 runs/min +21%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	107 runs/min +13%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	94.6 runs/min

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 56.5, n=80, last 2 years)	14.5 runs/min +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	9.56 runs/min +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (7 - 9.56, n=3)	7.89 runs/min +13%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	7 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	6.88 runs/min -2%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 278, n=88, last 2 years)	132.5 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	122 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (111 - 122, n=3)	116.3 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	111 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	100 Points -10%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 160221, n=132, last 2 years)	50840 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	39336 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	39091 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (34926 - 39336, n=3)	37784 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	31245 Points -21%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco X7	1312.2 ms * -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (973 - 1093, n=3)	1025 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	1008.1 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 (Chrome 155)	973.1 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (216 - 2718, n=119, last 2 years)	859 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco X8	Xiaomi Poco X7	Nothing Phone (4b)	Motorola Moto G77	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-46%	-26%	-48%	-0%	-5%	17%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	2052.5	947.4 -54%	952.54 -54%	522.1 -75%	2098.67 2%	1777 ?(950 - 3497, n=128) -13%	2263 ?(270 - 4370, n=177, last 2 years) 10%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1986.1	915.23 -54%	860.56 -57%	494.6 -75%	1981.23 0%	1253 ?(166.8 - 2674, n=128) -37%	1966 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=177, last 2 years) -1%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	264.1	100.16 -62%	253.22 -4%	217.2 -18%	266.38 1%	289 ?(173.5 - 543, n=128) 9%	316 ?(47.6 - 614, n=177, last 2 years) 20%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	263.1	226.88 -14%	293.92 12%	206.2 -22%	251.83 -4%	319 ?(62.6 - 548, n=129) 21%	362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=177, last 2 years) 38%

排放 – Poco X8 在负载下几乎不降频

温度

持续负载下的机身表面温度较为明显，但并不严重——我们测得的峰值略低于 42 °C。

值得肯定的是：Poco X8 在 3DMark 压力测试中仅出现轻微的性能下降，因此即使长时间运行，也能维持接近最高水平的性能输出。

Max. Load

Idle


41.8 °C	39.9 °C	37.5 °C
41.9 °C	39.9 °C	37.8 °C
41.6 °C	40.9 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 39.9 °C


37.3 °C	38.7 °C	38 °C
38.7 °C	38.9 °C	41.2 °C
37.5 °C	38.1 °C	40.5 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 % 0%
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 %
Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 % -8%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 %
Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 % -1%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø4.64 (4.63-4.64) %

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5.05-5.07) %

Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.31) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø4.6 (4.26-4.64) %

Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.6 (17.6-17.7) %

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8) %

Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.3 (22.2-22.3) %

Motorola Moto G77 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.28 (8.26-8.3) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.5 (17.4-17.5) %

Xiaomi Poco X8 Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07) %

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57) %

Nothing Phone (4b) Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.6 (2.58-2.62) %

扬声器

底部有一个小扬声器，与听筒共同组成 Poco X8 的立体声系统。不过，音乐播放并不生动，因为声音过于偏重高音，缺乏临场感。

通过 USB-C 接口或蓝牙连接的外置扬声器或耳机，音质通常更好。遗憾的是，Poco X8 仅支持较旧的蓝牙 5.1，因此缺少许多较新版本中的功能，例如适用于助听器的蓝牙 LE Audio，或用于定位设备的 Channel Sounding。

另一方面，Xiaomi 提供了丰富的蓝牙编解码器选择，因此你的音频设备很有可能以较好的音质连接到这款手机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco X8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Motorola Moto G77 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

续航时间 – 配备大容量电池的平价 Android 手机

能量摄入

Poco X8 的能效并不算出色，只有在极高负载下例外。

这款手机最高支持 67 瓦充电，并在我们的测试实验室中证实与各款充电器完全兼容。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt
Load	4.8 / 8.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco X8 8340 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh	Nothing Phone (4b) 5200 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 8340 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	5%	-4%	-2%	0%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.2	1.09 9%	1.01 16%	1.27 -6%	1.235 ?(1.2 - 1.27, n=2) -3%	0.903 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=136, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.8	1.28 29%	2 -11%	1.98 -10%	1.89 ?(1.8 - 1.98, n=2) -5%	1.479 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=136, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.3	1.31 43%	2.09 9%	2.3 -0%	2.3 ?(2.3 - 2.3, n=2) -0%	1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=136, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.8	3.25 32%		4.62 4%	4.71 ?(4.62 - 4.8, n=2) 2%	6.66 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=88, last 2 years) -39%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	8.1	8.62 -6%		8.73 -8%	8.42 ?(8.1 - 8.73, n=2) -4%	10.6 ?(4.75 - 22, n=88, last 2 years) -31%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.04 (1.273-8.02) Watt

Xiaomi Poco X8; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.857 (1.633-4) Watt

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.857 (1.633-4) Watt

Xiaomi Poco X8; 2560x1440 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited: Ø3.56 (3.24-5.27) Watt

电池续航时间

Poco X8 的最大优势之一是其续航能力：在 Wi-Fi 续航测试中，这款手机的续航时间接近 30 小时，表现令人印象深刻，为这一价位树立了标杆。一些同价位手机的续航时间仅为其 60%。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		29h 29min

	Xiaomi Poco X8 8340 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh	Nothing Phone (4b) 5200 mAh	Motorola Moto G77 5200 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 8340 mAh
Battery runtime		-41%	-25%	-32%	-1%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	29.5	17.5 -41%	22 -25%	20 -32%	29.2 -1%
Reader / Idle (h)				50
Load (h)				5.2

Notebookcheck 综合评分

Xiaomi 以实惠的价格为 Poco X8 带来了出色的屏幕和续航表现，令人印象深刻。

另一方面，性能和相机画质上的缩水也很明显。

Xiaomi Poco X8 评测。评测机由 Xiaomi Deutschland 提供。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco X8 - 10/16/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

42 / 69 → 61%

Weight

88 / 50-100 → 75%

Battery

96%

Display

89%

Games Performance

12 / 55 → 22%

Application Performance

61 / 85 → 72%

AI Performance

10%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

60%

Average

64%

76%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
95.2%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
91.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 55.3%

可选替代方案对比

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 75.8%	Xiaomi Poco X8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	List Price: 320€	223 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 77.7%	Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.2		185.5 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED
3. 76.5%	Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2	List Price: 329€	210 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.77" 2344x1080 381 PPI Super AMOLED
4. 76.7%	Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	List Price: 300€	182 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
5. 76.7%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	List Price: 480€	223 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Xiaomi Poco X8 智能手机评测 – 可能是 2026 年续航和屏幕表现最超值的手机

好用又实惠？

Xiaomi Poco X8 评测结论

Pros

Cons

价格和供货情况

Table of Contents

规格

机身 – 坚固的 Xiaomi 手机采用大量塑料材质

尺寸对比

功能 – 配备最高 12 GB RAM 的 Poco 手机

软件 – 为价格亲民的中端手机提供长期更新

可持续性

通信与 GNSS – 不支持 WiFi 7 的 Xiaomi 智能手机

电话功能与通话质量 – Poco X8 不支持 eSIM

摄像头 – 这款中端手机缺少广角摄像头

配件与保修 – Poco 在欧洲不附带电源适配器

输入设备与操作 – 配备指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机

显示屏 – 中端手机搭载支持 DC 调光的超高亮度 OLED 屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 – Poco X8 是一款价格亲民的旗舰杀手吗？

排放 – Poco X8 在负载下几乎不降频

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Xiaomi Poco X8 audio analysis

Motorola Moto G77 audio analysis

续航时间 – 配备大容量电池的平价 Android 手机

能量摄入

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

可选替代方案对比

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles