判决
小米 Poco F8 Pro 定位为一款功能强大的高端智能手机，其性能、续航能力和显示屏质量都是其明确的重点。Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC、12 GB RAM 和明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板确保了极高的日常性能。
6,210 mAh 电池与 100 W 快速充电相结合，可在短时间内提供高于平均水平的运行时间。
IP68 认证、Android 16 和 HyperOS 3.0 的超长更新时间以及 Bose 优化的立体声音效也是它的一些亮点。
不足之处包括不支持无线充电、速度较慢的 USB 2.0 标准无显示输出以及软件中的广告。
总而言之，Poco F8 Pro 提供了一系列良好、均衡的功能，几乎没有任何妥协。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Poco F8 Pro 可在小米商店直接购买，也可在欧洲的亚马逊和MediaMarkt等大型零售商处购买。这款智能手机尚未在美国亚马逊上市。
- $9.99Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 Pro Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
- $347.00XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G LTE (for Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 12GB) Ai 6.67" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2412DPC0AG (Green)
Table of Contents
- 判决
- 规格Poco F8 Pro
- 构建：配备 IP68 防护等级和大猩猩 7i 玻璃的 Poco F8 Pro
- 特点只有 USB 2.0 接口，没有无线充电功能
- 软件：HyperOS 3.0，六年更新一次
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统：使用 Poco F8 Pro 实现精确定位
- 电话功能和语音质量内置 Vo5G
- 相机：新增光学变焦功能
- 配件和保修：仅 12 个月的支持
- 输入设备和操作：带有超声波指纹的 F8 Pro
- 显示屏明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕，刷新率高达 120 赫兹
- 性能Poco 依靠骁龙 8 精英处理器
- 排放：适度冷却的 Poco F8 Pro
- 电池续航时间Poco F8 Pro 配备 6210 毫安时电池
- Notebookcheck 对 Poco F8 Pro 的总体印象
- 潜在竞争对手比较
铂金版 Poco F7 Pro发布不久。不过，消费者不必担心产品周期会缩短，而是要注意到 Poco 战略的改变。
与前代产品相比，Poco F8 Pro 显示出了一些变化，但遗憾的是，并非所有变化都是积极的。这款智能手机今年的价格也略有上涨。
配备 256 GB 存储空间的基本版本的零售价接近 650 欧元，而 512 GB 版本的价格为 700 欧元，换句话说，比以前贵了 50 欧元。
我们的评论将澄清 Poco F8 Pro 的附加费用是否值得，以及您是否还可以使用 F7 Pro。
规格Poco F8 Pro
构建：配备 IP68 防护等级和大猩猩 7i 玻璃的 Poco F8 Pro
Poco F8 Pro 有黑色、蓝色和钛银三种颜色可供选择。尽管采用了更大的电池，但机身高度已降至 8 毫米--我们测得的高度为 8.25 毫米，带摄像头的机身高度可达 10.8 毫米。
做工和材料外观都不错。磨砂铝边框令人赏心悦目；缝隙紧密均匀。在进行扭转测试时，F8 Pro 看起来很稳定，但内部会发出噼啪声。
小米新款智能手机通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。卡槽盖板略微嵌入边框，但视觉上并不明显。
特点只有 USB 2.0 接口，没有无线充电功能
Poco F8 Pro 配备了红外爆破器，用于控制家用电器和多媒体设备。小米离线通讯功能也已在小米 15T 系列中实现。此外，它还配备了全面屏。
不出所料，它既没有音频插孔，也没有 microSD 插槽。遗憾的是，也没有无线充电功能。
此外，它使用的 USB 2.0 标准既不快速，也不支持有线显示输出。
软件：HyperOS 3.0，六年更新一次
小米 Poco F8 Pro 预装了谷歌Android 16 和 HyperOS 3.0。这款手机预计将获得六年的安全补丁和四年的主要版本更新（自上市起）。
Poco 可以充分利用小米的 HyperAI。预装的第三方应用程序相当丰富，但可以卸载。
不过，令人讨厌的是通知栏、锁屏和文件管理器中的默认广告。
可持续性
Poco 网站上只有关于可持续发展的一般信息，没有关于这款智能手机的完整报告。外包装基本不使用塑料，但完全采用收缩包装。
没有为用户提供维修服务。
通信和全球导航卫星系统：使用 Poco F8 Pro 实现精确定位
Poco F8 Pro 支持所有现代手机标准，频率范围广。在大都市环境中，接收特性良好。
WLAN 可使用 Wi-Fi 7，但没有快速的 6 GHz 频段。
使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器时，小米手机在 5 GHz 频段的传输速率快速而稳定。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
无论是在室内还是室外，Poco F8 Pro 都能准确地确定定位。在室内确定位置需要多花几秒钟，但仍在可接受的范围内。
在一次自行车旅行中，我们将 F8 Pro 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，两款设备的导航性能相差无几，F8 Pro 只是在某些地方稍稍偏离了轨道。
总而言之，F8 Pro 的表现非常出色。
电话功能和语音质量内置 Vo5G
将 Poco F8 Pro 贴在耳边时，在较安静的环境中通话质量非常好。不过，噪音抑制效果一般，可能会出现掉线现象，尤其是在繁忙的道路上。扬声器的通话质量不错，几乎没有混响。
手机支持双卡双待，可使用两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡，也可混合使用两种标准。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，Vo5G 在测试中也能正常工作。
相机：新增光学变焦功能
尽管分辨率很高，但 Poco F8 Pro 的前置摄像头并没有使用像素分选技术。它在日光下拍摄的照片效果不错，但有些照片看起来有点过于锐化。在弱光环境下，照片的细节会有所损失，但仍然不错。前置摄像头录制的视频最高可达 4K 30 fps。
主摄像头和超广角与 F7 Pro 大致相同，但 F8 Pro 的 f/1.88 光圈名义上亮度较低。主镜头拍摄出的照片画面均衡，构图吸引人。在暗处，拍摄对象的亮度较低，从而保留了更多细节，使图像看起来更真实。超广角镜头是一个很好的补充，但质量一般。
新功能是 2.5 倍（等效 60 毫米）光学变焦，遗憾的是没有光学防抖功能。不过，只要手够稳，还是可以获得不错的效果，而且它还可以用作微距镜头（最小距离：50 厘米）。
主摄像头录制的视频最高可达 8K 30 帧/秒，但即使使用变焦，也能以 60 帧/秒的速度录制 4K 和 1080p 视频。不过，只有主摄像头的防抖效果较好。
缩放级别
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
配件和保修：仅 12 个月的支持
Poco F8 Pro 随附一条 USB Type-A 转 Type-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一个保护套。
提供的保修期仅为 12 个月，但这并不影响 经销商保修在德国的保修期。
此外，还可选配小米 Care 两年期保险套餐，费用为 59 欧元或 79 欧元，视保险范围而定。
输入设备和操作：带有超声波指纹的 F8 Pro
电容式触摸屏能可靠地响应输入，并提供良好的滑动性能。预装的屏幕保护膜也是如此，不过玻璃的触感更为舒适。显示屏下方集成了超声波指纹传感器，不仅速度惊人，而且识别率非常高。
触觉反馈由线性振动电机提供，非常清晰，但并不特别有力。通过前置摄像头进行的人脸识别在光线良好的条件下工作可靠，但可靠性较低。
显示屏明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕，刷新率高达 120 赫兹
相比之下 Poco F7 Pro相比，F8 Pro 的显示屏略小，不再提供 WQHD 分辨率，但仍能保证清晰的显示效果。它不是 LTPO 面板，因此刷新率只能由系统在 60 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间调节。
亮度非常高，在 APL18 和 HDR 测量中均达到约 3,500 cd/m²。手动将滑块设置为最大值时，峰值亮度可达 610 cd/m²，而阳光模式下的亮度可达 820 cd/m²。
Poco 在规格书中说明亮度控制采用直流调光。但在示波器下，它更像是一种基频较低的高频 PWM 调光。
因此，显示屏比较容易看清，但不会闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1717 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
CCT: 6574 K
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi 15T AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Honor 400 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1280, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -85% | -42% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1717 | 1136 -34% | 1070 -38% | 1535 -11% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1721 | 1132 -34% | 1079 -37% | 1531 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 98 0% | 94 -4% | 99 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 3.5 -250% | 1.5 -50% | 1.1 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 5.5 -150% | 3.9 -77% | 2.2 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.4 -41% | 2.5 -47% | 1.7 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.02 109% | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6574 99% | 6322 103% | 6648 98% | 6511 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 13.61 % Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8108 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
只要在设置中将色温调至暖色，Poco 智能手机就能呈现准确的色彩显示。否则，显示屏会明显偏冷。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5495 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.539 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.632 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7135 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Poco F8 Pro 在室外给人留下了良好的印象，始终保持清晰易读，只是在明亮的环境中显示屏上的反光可能会令人讨厌。
面板的视角稳定性非常好。在非常平的视角下，会感觉到一些亮度损失。
性能Poco 依靠骁龙 8 精英处理器
Poco F8 Pro 配备了速度极快的 骁龙 8 精英SoC 处理器，两个版本均配备 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。
在日常使用中，这保证了流畅的系统性能和足够的动力。
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1064 - 2674, n=18) | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=18) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 17293, n=16) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
图形计算由集成的 Adreno 830GPU 执行，它支持基于硬件的光线追踪，目前仍是速度最快的移动 GPU 之一。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=18) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143) | |
| Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (11.7 - 36.8, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143) | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=25) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143) | |
| Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=154, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1258, n=20) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Xiaomi 15T | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -20% | -49% | -4% | -34% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3959.14 | 3756.44 -5% | 1954.45 -51% | 3734 ? -6% | 2228 ? -44% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3833.02 | 2450.19 -36% | 1879.62 -51% | 3209 ? -16% | 1852 ? -52% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 309.91 | 382.44 23% | 278.9 -10% | 380 ? 23% | 296 ? -4% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 521.31 | 198.68 -62% | 89.68 -83% | 438 ? -16% | 339 ? -35% |
排放：适度冷却的 Poco F8 Pro
温度
在负载情况下，表面温度急剧上升，但仍保持在无害范围内。在压力测试中，SoC 的节流也相当高。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
扬声器
这两个扬声器经过 Bose 优化，能带来良好的声音体验。只有在最大音量时，高音才会急剧下降，从而导致播放时失真。
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间Poco F8 Pro 配备 6210 毫安时电池
能源消耗
功耗很低。F8 Pro 只能使用数据线充电，但支持高达 100 W 的 USB-PD 充电。
在测试中，充满电仅需约 38 分钟（50%：17 分钟，80%：29 分钟）。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.39 Watt |
| Idle |  0.83 / 1.37 / 1.56 Watt |
| Load |
8.71 / 8.74 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 6210 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh | Honor 400 Pro 5300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -1% | -32% | -24% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.83 | 0.87 -5% | 0.8 4% | 1.09 -31% | 1.09 ? -31% | 0.842 ? -1% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.37 | 1.48 -8% | 1.2 12% | 2.06 -50% | 1.66 ? -21% | 1.439 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.56 | 1.52 3% | 1.26 19% | 2.09 -34% | 1.879 ? -20% | 1.624 ? -4% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 8.71 | 6.76 22% | 6.8 22% | 9.72 -12% | 8.87 ? -2% | 7.03 ? 19% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 8.74 | 12.89 -47% | 14.32 -64% | 11.48 -31% | 12.8 ? -46% | 11.3 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在亮度为 150cd/m2的标准 WLAN 测试中，Poco F8 Pro 几乎可以使用一整天。在实际使用中，这款智能手机的电池应该可以轻松支撑两天。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
Notebookcheck 对 Poco F8 Pro 的总体印象
小米 Poco F8 Pro 将优雅的设计与 Bose 优化的立体声音效、快速的骁龙 8 Elite 芯片、明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏和 6,210 mAh 超大电池结合在一起。
不过，它没有无线充电功能，在软件和连接方面也有一些小缺点。
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- 12/18/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $338.00 XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $9.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 P... 3. $347.00 XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... List Price: 700€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2510x1156 419 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.6%  | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto... 2. $6.99 amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou... 3. $3.99 Wiaocit 3 Pack Tempered Glas... List Price: 809€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED |
3. 84.8%  | Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.59 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 2. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15T Pro 5... 3. $7.99 Fhyeugfy for Xiaomi 15T Pro ... List Price: 650€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
4. 82.5%  | Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind For Honor 400 Pro 5G... 2. $9.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor 400 5G Scr... List Price: 800€ | 205 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2800x1280 460 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
