Notebookcheck Logo
三星Galaxy S25 FE

最经济实惠的Galaxy S25 在错误的地方偷工减料 - 三星Galaxy S25 FE 智能手机评测

充满妥协

三星Galaxy S25 FE 提供了大量的功能和性能，而且现在价格大幅下降，同时还有 7 年的更新。然而，与前代产品相比，S25 FE 的改进微乎其微，而且在电池续航时间方面，"粉丝版 "确实存在不足。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G AI Android Galaxy S Samsung Smartphone Touchscreen

三星Galaxy S25 FE 的评价

三星Galaxy S25 FE 发布后不久就大幅降价，潜在买家一定会很高兴听到这个消息。存储容量最小的 128 GB 版本被称为 "Fan Edition"（MRSP 649.99 美元），现在的售价不到 550 美元。

此外，你还能得到很多物有所值的东西。Galaxy S25 FE 拥有明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、强大的通信功能、出色的三摄像头和长期更新。与Galaxy S25 的姊妹机型相比，该机省略了一些日常使用中不易察觉的功能：光学指纹传感器而非超声波版本，仅采用 LTPS 面板而非 LPTO 面板，Exynos 2400 性能较差。

即便如此，Galaxy S25 FE 并没有让潜在买家感到轻松。它最大的缺点是在Galaxy S25 系列中电池寿命最短。此外，它的发热量有时过高，PWM 调光频率较低，而Galaxy S25 的同事的调光频率是它的两倍。

如果尺寸对你来说并不重要，那么风扇版尽管大幅降价，却很难卖得出去。现在，您只需支付与 128 GB 机型相同的价格，就能买到三星Galaxy S25，它几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹，甚至电池续航时间也更长。

Pros

+ 轻巧、高品质的外壳
+ 亮度高达 120 Hz 的 AMOLED 显示屏
+ 支持长时间更新
+ 所有Galaxy AI 功能
+ 出色的三摄像头
+ SoC 性能卓越
+ 充电功率高达 40 瓦

Cons

- 电池续航时间短
- 无 WiFi 7，无 UWB
- 无 LPTO 面板
- PWM 调光频率仅为 240 Hz
- 蓝牙编解码器数量少
- 负载时发热

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，您可以从亚马逊订购Galaxy S25 FE，价格为 548.99 美元。

三星Galaxy S25 FE 是 S24 FE 的继任者。 Galaxy S24 FE."FE "代表 "粉丝版"，因为它的重点主要放在对这些设备的用户特别重要的功能上。不过，三星似乎已经为此找到了理想的配方，因为与前代产品相比，它的变化并不大。

尽管如此，Galaxy S25 FE 还是在一些方面进行了改进。例如，它的电池容量更大，充电速度更快。它还变得更轻，运行Android 16，并配备了更快的处理器。

通过Galaxy S25 FE，三星开始填补价格适中的Galaxy A 机型和Galaxy S 智能手机之间的空白，这也是 Fan Edition 在价格和功能方面介于这两个Galaxy 系列之间的原因。我们的评测将揭示这一公式在 2025 年是否仍然有效。

规格

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Galaxy S25 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2400 10 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Samsung Xclipse 940
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 382 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, FHD+, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, max. brightness 1900 nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung DeX, Samsung SmartThings
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 161.3 x 76.6
Battery
4900 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45W max. charging speed (compatible with QC2.0 and AFC), 15W wireless charging, supports reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix main camera (1/1.56“ sensor, f/1.8, AF, OIS, 10x digital zoom, 84° FOV) + 12 MP ultrawide (1/3.2“ sensor, f/2.2 Blende, 2x digital zoom, 123° FOV) + 8 MP tele (1/4.4“ Sensor, f/2.4, Autofokus, OIS, 3x optical zoom, 10x digital zoom, 30x max. zoom, 32° FOV), video recording up to 8K@30fps & 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (1/3.2“ sensor, f/2.2, 80° FOV, video recording up to 4K@60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, quick start guide, warranty information, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 certified, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ (front & back), aluminium frame; USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 copy benchmark speed: 298.8 MB/s with external SSD Samsung Portable SSD T7; Security: Knox Enhanced Encrypted Protection (KEEP), Personal Data Engine (PDE); HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+ HLG; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1I, B1Cm B2a), NavIC (L1), QZSS (L1); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM, eSIM support, VoLTE/WiFI calling; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC (Samsung Seamless Codec); SAR: Head SAR 0.544 W/kg, Body SAR 1.575 W/kg; Update policy: 7 years of Android updates, 7 years of security patches until September 2032, fanless, waterproof
Weight
190 g
Price
809 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

表壳 - 采用大猩猩 Victus+ 玻璃的防水表壳Galaxy S25 FE

Galaxy S25 FE 棱角分明的设计让人不禁联想到其前身，因此也沿用了当前Galaxy S25 车型的设计语言。无论采用哪种颜色，其正面和背面同样保持平整，并由哑光铝框包围。其中，买家可以选择白色、冰蓝色、黑色和深蓝色。

其 IP68 防水防尘外壳做工精良，比 S24 FE 轻 23 克，厚度也更薄。 Galaxy S24 FE.正面和背面均由大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护。大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 则用于价格更高的Galaxy S25 型号。

后继机型的优势：Galaxy S25 FE 的显示屏边框明显比Galaxy S24 FE 薄，使其看起来更高档。不过，它的显示屏边框并不完全对称，因为 OLED 面板的底部仍比侧面和顶部突出几毫米。

尺寸比较

❌
162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162 mm 77.3 mm 8 mm 213 g161.72 mm 75.77 mm 8.02 mm 206 g160.6 mm 75.59 mm 8.99 mm 218 g161.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.4 mm 190 g160.26 mm 74.95 mm 8.39 mm 212 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.3 mm 190 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 -Galaxy S25 FE 的存储容量高达 512 GB

三星提供三种存储容量的Galaxy S25 FE：128 GB（UFS 3.1）、256 GB 和 512 GB（均为 UFS 4.0）：128 GB（UFS 3.1）、256 GB 和 512 GB（均为 UFS 4.0）。每个版本均配备 8 GB 内存。256 GB 测试机型的官方售价为 709.99 美元。

三星在粉丝版中省略了Galaxy S25 的两项功能：WiFi 7 和 UWB。取而代之的是 WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4、NFC、Samsung Dex 和 USB-C 3.2 Gen.1。其 USB-C 端口支持有线图像输出，可用于 DeX 或镜像图像内容。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右侧：功能按钮、音量摇杆
右侧：功能按钮、音量摇杆
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 gen 1、扬声器
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 gen 1、扬声器

软件 -Android 16 和 2032 年之前的软件更新

三星为Galaxy S25 FE 配备了Android 16 和 OneUI 8.0。它还配备了Galaxy S25 兄弟姐妹机型上的全套Galaxy AI 套件和一项名为 Knox Enhanced Encrypted Protection (KEEP) 的新安全功能。据三星称，KEEP 为每个应用程序创建了一个加密存储环境，因此每个应用程序只能访问自己的数据。

自手机发布之日起，操作系统升级和安全更新的有效期为 7 年。对于Galaxy S25 FE，支持将持续到 2032 年 9 月。在进行测试时，这款智能手机还没有被列入三星移动安全网站，但与前代产品一样，它很可能每月都会收到安全更新。在我们 10 月初的测试中，安全更新截至 9 月 1 日。

三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE

可持续性

三星在其《2025 年可持续发展报告》中提供了有关其可持续发展工作的信息。.此外，该制造商还通过生命周期评估来说明其移动设备在生产、使用和处置过程中对环境的影响。对于Galaxy S25 FE，三星估计其对环境的影响为 45.9 千克二氧化碳当量。

产品包装使用了可回收材料。在Galaxy S25 系列产品中，三星使用了塑料、稀土、钢、玻璃、金、铜、钴和铝等可回收材料。三星通过其自助维修服务提供原装更换部件和维修说明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 带有 WiFi 6E 和良好 GPS 功能的三星手机

Galaxy S25 FE 支持所有主要的 4G 和 5G 移动频率，使其具备了在国外使用的良好条件。不过，这款智能手机的 WiFi 性能略显有限，因为它采用了 Exynos 2400不支持 WiFi 7。

即便如此，使用 WiFi 6E 仍能实现高速上网。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，我们测得的峰值速度约为 1600 Mbps，数据传输基本保持稳定。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼75%
Nothing Phone (3)
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼99%
OnePlus 13R
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1768) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼96%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼75%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1342 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
748 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1344 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1403 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (808-1664)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (984-1422)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1186 (1151-1206)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1187-1213)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (474-967)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1072 (655-1214)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (504-1018)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1153 (1048-1191)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Galaxy S25 FE 可提供理想的导航条件。它支持多种卫星导航服务，包括 GPS、伽利略、格洛纳斯、北斗、NavIC 和 QZSS，甚至可以在双频模式下接收其中一些信号，从而实现更精确的定位。

在一次 10 公里的自行车骑行中，智能手机很快就接收到了良好的信号，但它并不总是能像 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表那样准确地记录我们的路线。如果你不介意 GPS 偶尔出现几米的偏差，那么这款智能手机就是一款不错的导航仪。

GPS 测试：概述
GPS 测试：概述
GPS 测试：城市
GPS 测试：城市
GPS 测试：湖泊
GPS 测试：湖泊

电话功能和通话质量

Galaxy S25 FE 拥有良好的通话质量。这款智能手机能自然地传输语音，并有效过滤背景噪音。除了 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能外，用户还可以利用Galaxy AI 进行通话，因为它可以实时翻译对话内容。

Galaxy S25 FE 可容纳两张实体 SIM 卡。还支持双 eSIM 操作或物理 SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡的组合。

摄像头 - 三摄像头，分辨率为 5000 万像素，3 倍光学变焦

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Galaxy S25 FE 的相机系统与其前代产品相比，在技术和图像质量方面几乎没有任何变化。最大的升级是自拍摄像头，但只是在像素数量上。前置摄像头传感器的分辨率从 1000 万像素提高到 1200 万像素，自拍效果一如既往。

背面仍有三个垂直排列的摄像头：一个光学防抖主摄像头，分辨率为 5000 万像素，两侧分别是一个超广角摄像头（1200 万像素）和一个带 3 倍光学变焦的长焦摄像头（800 万像素）。

主摄像头能在日光下拍摄出漂亮的照片，正如三星的典型特色一样，色彩鲜艳而逼真，而在较暗环境下拍摄的照片很快就会显得模糊不清。超广角摄像头的表现也不错，不过即使拍摄对象光线充足，图像边缘也会出现模糊。

我们注意到，长焦相机的质量差异最大，因为使用Galaxy S25 FE 拍摄的照片在变焦水平较高时比使用 Galaxy S24 FE.

三摄像头可以每秒 60 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。如果只使用主摄像头，则可拍摄每秒 24 帧的 8K 视频。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylight photoUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

在可控的照明条件下，Galaxy S25 FE 的色彩显示非常准确，即使在几乎完全黑暗的环境中也能捕捉到整个测试图。总体而言，作为一款智能手机，它的色彩偏差非常小。

ColorChecker
0.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: 3.4 ∆E min: 0.85 - max: 7.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: 8.33 ∆E min: 3.88 - max: 17.78 ∆E

配件和保修 - 40 瓦电源需额外付费

手机随附 USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。

三星提供为期 12 个月的保修服务，用户还可以通过Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐，其费用取决于保险范围和保险期限。最经济实惠的计划（只提供意外保险，不提供防盗保护）在取消前每月需支付 3 美元，或一次性支付 49 美元即可享受两年保险。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S25 FE 配备光学指纹传感器

支持 Exynos 2400SoC 和反应灵敏的 120 Hz 触摸屏的支持，Galaxy S25 FE 的使用感觉非常流畅。智能手机的线性振动电机提供了清晰的触觉反馈，这一点得到了强调。

位于音量摇杆下方的功能键按两次可启动照相机应用程序，按住不放可启动双子座语音助手。不过，如果需要，它也可以变回传统的电源按钮。

光学指纹传感器提供生物识别安全功能。它位于显示屏下方，在我们的测试过程中可以快速、准确地工作。此外，用户还可以设置 2D 面部识别，但这种方法被认为安全性较低，因为很容易被规避。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - LTPS AMOLED，120 Hz

子像素
子像素

手机的 6.7 英寸 AMOLED 屏幕由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护，支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。它可以动态调整刷新率，但只有两种固定刷新率：60 Hz 和 120 Hz。这意味着它比其他Galaxy S25 型号的 LTPO 面板更节省电池电量，后者的刷新率可低至 1 Hz。

在我们的测试中，当显示白色背景时，屏幕的平均亮度为 1132 cd/m²，而当显示小幅图像时（APL18），屏幕亮度最高可达 1863 cd/m²。在显示 HDR 内容时，亮度甚至可以达到 1990 cd/m²。总体而言，其亮度值与 Galaxy S24 FE.

对 PWM 比较敏感的用户肯定希望三星能够取消亮度调节的脉宽调制，或者至少设置一个较高的调光频率。然而，在 240 Hz 的频率下，屏幕闪烁的频率并不高，因此很可能引发 PWM 典型症状，如头痛或恶心。

1140
cd/m²		1131
cd/m²		1135
cd/m²
1140
cd/m²		1136
cd/m²		1132
cd/m²
1139
cd/m²		1118
cd/m²		1113
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1140 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1131.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.69 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1136 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.02
CCT: 6322 K
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Nothing Phone (3)
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"		Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		OnePlus 13R
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
9%
42%
29%
17%
27%
40%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1136
1548
36%
1607
41%
1213
7%
1371
21%
1211
7%
1846
63%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1132
1535
36%
1609
42%
1206
7%
1370
21%
1214
7%
1850
63%
Brightness Distribution (%)
98
98
0%
95
-3%
97
-1%
96
-2%
99
1%
93
-5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
2.2
37%
0.9
74%
1
71%
2.7
23%
1.6
54%
1.2
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
5.5
-0%
1.8
67%
2.3
58%
4.2
24%
2.4
56%
2.9
47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
3.7
-54%
1.7
29%
1.6
33%
2
17%
1.5
37%
2.3
4%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.03 108%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
6322 103%
6787 96%
6346 102%
6546 99%
6450 101%
6456 101%
6707 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 15.31 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8194 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

在我们使用光光谱仪进行分析时，显示屏显示出很高的色彩保真度。在"自然"模式下（第二个色彩配置文件 "鲜艳"是预设的），它的图像质量最好，因为所有图像参数都在最佳范围内。

色彩精度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（图像模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7005 ms rise
↘ 0.6615 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6555 ms rise
↘ 0.685 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

三星Galaxy S25 FE 很适合在户外使用，因为即使在明亮的天气里，显示内容也清晰可见。不过，这样做时必须保持亮度传感器处于激活状态。如果没有传感器的支持，可视角度稳定屏幕的最大亮度将降至 416 cd/m²。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备 Exynos 2400 处理器的三星Galaxy S25 FE

Galaxy S25 系列机型在处理器选择方面的等级划分最为明显。Galaxy S25 FE 只能使用 Exynos 2400处理器，而其他Galaxy S25 智能手机则采用性能更高的 骁龙 8 精英处理器Galaxy.

只要不在智能手机上编辑 4K 视频或运行要求极高的应用程序，三星自家产品的性能仍能轻松满足日常使用需求。我们的测试机在与 Galaxy S24 FE的性能比较中胜出，计算速度与 骁龙 8 代 3如果不考虑人工智能测试的话。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3136 Points +48%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2959 Points +40%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2309 Points +9%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2214 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
2212 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2118 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (2045 - 2118, n=3)
2076 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
2066 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3803, n=203, last 2 years)
1702 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10029 Points +47%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8711 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8154 Points +19%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
7161 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6839 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (6456 - 6839, n=3)
6610 Points -3%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6605 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
6341 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=203, last 2 years)
4976 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674793 Points +50%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2271821 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1975046 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1784939 Points
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1772142 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1616403 - 1784939, n=3)
1726404 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1516996 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)
1405736 Points -21%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20673 Points +17%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19622 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17693 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (17534 - 17763, n=3)
17663 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
17338 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
15928 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=184, last 2 years)
14559 Points -18%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13085 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13223 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11280 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
9953 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9879 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (9287 - 9879, n=3)
9544 Points -3%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9273 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
8827 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=144, last 2 years)
7389 Points -25%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17481 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
16698 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (14406 - 15253, n=3)
14766 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14640 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
14627 Points 0%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12637 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
11169 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=144, last 2 years)
11107 Points -24%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
16264 Points +32%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points +26%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
13961 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
13711 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
12343 Points
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12087 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (10178 - 12343, n=3)
10905 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
9036 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=144, last 2 years)
8382 Points -32%
Graphics
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45691 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
40323 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
33672 Points +27%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
27837 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26528 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (25796 - 26783, n=3)
26369 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)
24540 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
23338 Points -12%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2353 Points +18%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1987 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1982 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1908 - 1998, n=3)
1964 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1869 Points -6%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1763 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1754 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=144, last 2 years)
1667 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23141 Points +96%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22543 Points +91%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years)
19717 Points +67%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
17213 Points +46%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13564 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11781 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
11738 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (11342 - 11781, n=3)
11566 Points -2%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
231543 Points +19099%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=123, last 2 years)
27610 Points +2189%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1891 Points +57%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1474 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1206 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1173 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (1121 - 1206, n=3)
1154 Points -4%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 5210, n=35, last 2 years)
901 Points +178%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (n=1)
324 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (178 - 35890, n=35, last 2 years)
4072 Points +1091%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
342 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (n=1)
342 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=35, last 2 years)
5869 Points +435%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (n=1)
1096 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
997 Points -9%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=42, last 2 years)
904 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
245 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (n=1)
182 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
175 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12578 Points +1247%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points +1050%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10534 Points +1028%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points +755%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
5828 Points +524%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 12845, n=65, last 2 years)
4080 Points +337%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
934 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400
  (n=1)
934 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
598 Points -36%

由于 Exynos 2400的速度不是特别快 Xclipse 940图形处理器，Galaxy S25 FE 在 GPU 测试中只能排在中下游。在对比设备中，只有 Galaxy S24 FE的性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6885 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6036 Points +46%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points +43%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4854 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4490 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4142 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7029 Points +59%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5907 Points +34%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points +31%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4891 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4529 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4421 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4329 Points -2%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +72%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
22957 Points +48%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19048 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17885 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15464 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13847 Points -10%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12400 Points +41%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11251 Points +28%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8797 Points
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8398 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8357 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7948 Points -10%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12747 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11553 Points +33%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8714 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8624 Points -1%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8364 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7894 Points -9%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2525 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2295 Points +18%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1944 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1803 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1775 Points -9%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1706 Points -12%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2698 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2343 Points +16%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2017 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1821 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1784 Points -12%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1636 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
702 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
697 fps +80%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps +63%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
585 fps +51%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
545 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
384 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
450 fps +41%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps +21%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
364 fps +14%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
319 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
284 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
283 fps +13%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
266 fps +6%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
251 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
215 fps -14%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps -19%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps +29%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +20%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
164 fps +19%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +15%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
138 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88 fps -19%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -44%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +27%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps +12%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +6%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -2%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
286 fps +83%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps +65%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
248 fps +59%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps +43%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
208 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -1%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +53%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +29%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
43 fps +26%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps +21%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -12%

三星手机在网上冲浪时表现出色，加载网站速度快，显示无明显延迟。这在我们的浏览器测试中也取得了不错的成绩。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
334.386 Points +59%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points +35%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
243.318 Points +16%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
232.968 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
210.247 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
182.387 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (128.6 - 210, n=3)
159.3 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=149, last 2 years)
152.7 Points -27%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
115.454 Points -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
446 runs/min +22%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
366 runs/min
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
347 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
298 runs/min -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (260 - 366, n=3)
298 runs/min -19%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=130, last 2 years)
208 runs/min -43%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
29 runs/min +41%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min +27%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome)
21.3 runs/min +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
20.6 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (n=1)
20.6 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
16 runs/min -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=119, last 2 years)
13.9 runs/min -33%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
8.86 runs/min -57%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
239 Points +27%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
188 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
187 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (176 - 188, n=3)
180 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
163 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=143, last 2 years)
143.6 Points -24%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
137 Points -27%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
136 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
98817 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
94853 Points +22%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
78009 Points
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
71875 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (63452 - 78009, n=3)
68403 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
64838 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=196, last 2 years)
47449 Points -39%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
41734 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)
1210 ms * -151%
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133)
1002.6 ms * -108%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
972.4 ms * -101%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
598.12 ms * -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 2400 (483 - 662, n=3)
592 ms * -23%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
521.2 ms * -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)
483 ms *
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
388.7 ms * +20%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
382.9 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy S25 FE 的 UFS 4.0 存储实现了较高的数据吞吐量，但与前代产品一样，在 4KB 随机写入测试中的表现不如竞争对手。

Samsung Galaxy S25 FENothing Phone (3)Honor Magic7 ProOnePlus 13RSamsung Galaxy S25+Samsung Galaxy S24 FEXiaomi Poco F7 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
60%
27%
52%
24%
-45%
34%
26%
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3756.44
3720.79
-1%
3910.81
4%
3987.44
6%
4057.35
8%
1783.43
-53%
4002.68
7%
3658 ?(1493 - 4384, n=49)
-3%
2211 ?(270 - 4370, n=186, last 2 years)
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2450.19
3270.73
33%
3683.81
50%
3201.32
31%
3311.02
35%
631.23
-74%
3464.43
41%
2703 ?(555 - 3484, n=49)
10%
1816 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=186, last 2 years)
-26%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
382.44
438.57
15%
282.34
-26%
374.54
-2%
294.51
-23%
312.98
-18%
311.24
-19%
379 ?(218 - 483, n=49)
-1%
295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years)
-23%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
198.68
585.11
194%
357.04
80%
542.13
173%
351.16
77%
127.53
-36%
411.78
107%
393 ?(50.7 - 730, n=49)
98%
338 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years)
70%

游戏 - 尽管采用了 Exynos SoC，但仍是快速游戏平台

Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940虽然它不是最快的 GPU，但在我们的测试中仍然提供了极高的图像输出，我们甚至能够以最高细节流畅运行《源氏冲击》等要求苛刻的游戏。对于图形较为简单的《PUBG Mobile》来说更是如此，在游戏的内部 FPS 限制器启动之前，它的运行帧数高达每秒 60 帧。

我们使用Gamebench 测试了游戏帧率。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 6.0.0_36598533_36939763: Ø57.1 (46-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.0.0_36598533_36939763: Ø51.1 (38-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 4.0.0: Ø59.3 (52-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE; PUBG Mobile; HD; 4.0.0: Ø59.1 (52-61)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 4.0.0: Ø39.4 (34-41)

排放 - 最热门的Galaxy 智能手机

温度

......（英文 Exynos 2400似乎不喜欢长时间承受最大负荷。在我们的测试中，SoC 并没有明显的节流反应，导致其在 3DMark 压力测试中性能下降达 40%。温度高达 46.7 °C，其表面温度也相当高。

而在正常运行时，其温度始终保持适中。虽然智能手机在玩游戏时会发热，但在我们的测试中从未达到令人不适的温度。

Max. Load
 45.6 °C45.7 °C43.5 °C 
 46.5 °C45.1 °C42 °C 
 45.9 °C43.5 °C42.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 44.5 °C
42 °C45.2 °C46.7 °C
41.5 °C45.5 °C46 °C
38.5 °C43.7 °C44.7 °C
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 43.8 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.1 % +26%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.6 % +21%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.8 % +19%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.4 % -26%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.1 % +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.8 % +17%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % -5%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.5 % -30%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.2 % +38%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
74.5 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.4 % +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.8 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35.1 % -37%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.8 % +19%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.6 % +18%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % -1%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -3%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø16.4 (13.9-25.8)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.8 (47.6-89.1)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.2 (53-90.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø114.4 (89.3-165.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø19.6 (16.4-29.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26.8 (23-41.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø18.5 (15.8-28.3)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (24.9-33.4)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.81 (8.65-14.5)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3)
三星Galaxy S25 FE
三星Galaxy S25 FE

发言人

Galaxy S25 FE 采用立体声扬声器，播放音量可达 92 dB(A)。这款手机的中音可以更均衡，低音也可以更有层次感，但总体来说，音质还不错。

可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接外置音频设备。Galaxy S25 FE 的蓝牙编解码器支持仅限于 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC（三星无缝编解码器）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.939.62524.337.23120.740.54018.141.75030.837.86321.740.38014.842.810017.244.412514.348.816017.154.720014.356.425014.258.331514.559.54001362.550011.868.663013.27380010.973.9100011.776.9125011.480.8160011.781.1200012.38325001385315012.882.7400012.479.3500013.976.9630013.575.380001371.51000013.667.71250013.763.2160001356.9SPL24.892N0.685.3median 13median 73Delta1.210.838.239.332.533.221.92931.425.333.531.421.725.22424.317.828.716.638.419.753.61956.117.558.116.257.416.557.712.366.412.369.21572.613.275.612.475.811.676.713.380.31280.712.781.612.980.413.3781376.413.174.313.569.913.670.713.46425.489.90.778.3median 13.3median 72.61.710hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S25 FEXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 以高达 40 瓦的功率充电

耗电量

Galaxy S25 FE 的充电功率可达 40 瓦，无线充电功率可达 15 瓦。此外还支持反向无线充电。

据三星称，4900 毫安时电池可在 30 分钟内充至 65%。在使用第三方 Anker 317（100 瓦）电源适配器进行的测试中，我们没有完全做到这一点，但完全充电周期仍然只用了相对较短的 1:17 小时。我们用了 28 分钟将手机充电至 50%，用了 46 分钟将手机充电至 80%。

在功耗方面，三星智能手机基本上没有什么特别之处，但闲置时的耗电量相对较高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.47 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.48 / 1.52 Watt
Load midlight 6.76 / 12.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh		Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 2400
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
-13%
-20%
-8%
-18%
7%
4%
2%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.87
0.4
54%
0.94
-8%
0.81
7%
0.45
48%
0.78
10%
0.89
-2%
0.573 ?(0.42 - 0.87, n=3)
34%
0.856 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=155, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.48
0.7
53%
1.5
-1%
2.11
-43%
1.09
26%
1.31
11%
1.19
20%
1.083 ?(0.84 - 1.48, n=3)
27%
1.422 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=155, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.52
1.21
20%
1.57
-3%
2.17
-43%
1.13
26%
1.36
11%
1.22
20%
1.18 ?(0.95 - 1.52, n=3)
22%
1.599 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=155, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.76
11.03
-63%
9.2
-36%
14.41
-113%
13.23
-96%
8.76
-30%
9.65 ?(6.76 - 15.4, n=3)
-43%
7.17 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=137, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
12.89
11.68
9%
11.12
14%
16.37
-27%
16.23
-26%
9.3
28%
15.3 ?(12.9 - 16.5, n=3)
-19%
11.1 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=137, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.7 (1.077-16.6)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.58 (0.652-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.19 (0.617-16.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.47 (0.996-9.22)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.954 (0.776-8.12)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.5 (6.73-15.5)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.5-10.9)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.4 (9.58-16.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.17 (8.7-9.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.954 (0.776-8.12)

运行时间

在测试过程中，Galaxy S25 FE 的运行时间并没有给我们留下深刻印象。虽然它比前一代产品的运行时间更长，但这并不是什么了不起的成就，因为 Galaxy S24 FE在电池寿命方面的表现令人失望。

Galaxy S25 FE 应该可以应付一天的高强度使用，不会有太大问题。不过，与竞争对手相比，它的表现并不理想，如 Galaxy S25+等竞争对手相比，S25+ 的表现并不理想，后者同样配备了 6.7 英寸显示屏和大容量电池。不过，在我们的模拟网上冲浪测试和连续视频播放中，Galaxy S25 的续航时间要长几个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 03min
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh		Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh
Battery runtime
22%
26%
34%
30%
-17%
22%
Reader / Idle (h)
40.6
42.1
4%
38.3
-6%
56.6
39%
H.264 (h)
25.1
30.1
20%
40.5
61%
30.1
20%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
15.1
18.4
22%
24.7
64%
25.3
68%
19.8
31%
12.5
-17%
18.4
22%
Load (h)
3.1
3.6
16%
3.5
13%
4
29%

Notebookcheck 总评分

三星Galaxy S25 FE 以极少的成本提供了大量的功能和性能。即便如此，它与上一代产品相比变化不大，而且在某些情况下，其电池续航能力明显弱于所有其他Galaxy S25 机型。

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE - 10/11/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
65 / 69 → 94%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
35 / 55 → 64%
Application Performance
76 / 85 → 90%
AI Performance
27%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
82%
Average
78%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
90.6%
Materials
60%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
93.2%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 82.3%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto...
2. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
3. $7.89
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
List Price: 809€		190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
382 PPI
AMOLED
2.
84.8%
Nothing Phone (3)
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon: $899.00
List Price: 899 Euro		218 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2800x1260
460 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro...
2. $9.99
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono...
3. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
List Price: 1300€		223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
4.
82.9%
OnePlus 13R
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. $17.99
Hiooloon for OnePlus 13R Mag...
3. $9.98
JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...
List Price: 749€		206 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $9.72
Ferilinso 3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $7.78
amFilm Auto-alignment OneTou...
List Price: 1149 Euro		190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
6.
85.7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $5.89
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
2. $7.99
3 Pack Glass Screen Protecto...
3. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
AMOLED
7.
85.3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
3. $5.99
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi P...
List Price: 800€		212 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
Flow AMOLED

More articles related to this device

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Galaxy S25 Series)
News
•
三星Galaxy S25 FE 评测：与Galaxy S25+ 的主要区别
|
Magazine
•
iPhone 17 Pro Max：Apple新相机在首次评测中表现优于三星Galaxy S25 Ultra
|
News
•
忘掉 iPhone Air 吧：纤薄的中国旗舰机将配备巨型电池和长焦摄像头
|
News
•
三星Galaxy S25 FE 将不再便宜，但仍有惊喜等着你
|
News
•
三星Galaxy S25 Ultra 用户抱怨在拍摄月亮时出现大量相机问题
|
News
•
相机大战：300 美元手机击退 1870 美元手机，三星胜出
|
News
•
Galaxy S25 FE：三星经济型旗舰机的颜色和存储选项泄露
|
News
•
三星Galaxy S25 Ultra：BoM 分析显示昂贵的骁龙 8 精英版导致生产成本升高
|
News
•
我们测试了最好的智能手机相机：我们的结论和专业摄影师的 RAW 文件
|
Review
•
2025 年最佳智能手机的视频和照片测试：三星与肖像并不匹配
|
Review
•
与 2025 年最佳智能手机的摄像头对比：小米在夜间完全失败
|
News
•
根据泄露的信息，三星Galaxy S25 FE 将获得一些专业功能
|
News
•
变焦王：vivo X200 Ultra 击败谷歌、三星、Apple 、华为等旗舰机
|
News
•
三星Galaxy S25 Edge：超薄智能手机的续航时间超乎想象
|
Review
•
5.8 毫米超薄续航奇迹：三星Galaxy S25 Edge 智能手机评测
|
News
•
Galaxy S25 Edge 拆解显示，与 S25 Ultra 相比，三星缩小了 2.4 毫米。Galaxy
|
News
•
超薄型三星Galaxy S25 Edge 上手照片与 S25 Ultra 相得益彰
|
News
•
Galaxy S25 评测：三星紧凑型智能手机需要更好的硬件配置
|
Review
•
三星Galaxy S25 评测--紧凑型智能手机中的明星正在陨落
...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 最经济实惠的Galaxy S25 在错误的地方偷工减料 - 三星Galaxy S25 FE 智能手机评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-10-15 (Update: 2025-10-15)