小米 15S Pro 评测：旗舰智能手机的新独立性和强大电池续航能力

Name: Xiaomi 15S Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

没有 Snapdragon 8 Elite，旗舰智能手机能成功吗？

小米 15S Pro 搭载了全新的 XRing O1 处理器、徕卡品牌摄像头和先进的硅碳电池，而且价格非常实惠。在这篇 Notebookcheck 评测中，我们将探讨它与小米 15 Pro 的比较，以及它是否值得你购买。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/02/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen

结论：小米 15S Pro

小米 15S Pro 的整体性能与 Pro 机型类似。这并不令人意外，因为除了芯片组外，其他一切都保持不变。小米正在努力变得更加独立，并在内部提供所有组件，它的 XRing O1 正走在一条非常有前途的道路上。考虑到谷歌在 Tensor 系列上的工作，小米的 SoC 首次亮相确实令人瞩目。虽然搭载 XRing O1 的 15S Pro 性能略逊于搭载骁龙 8 Elite 的 15 Pro，但整体性能更为稳定。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

任何愿意接受更新支持和可用性方面妥协的人，都会得到一款拥有坚实硬件的优秀智能手机。不过，与小米 15 Pro 相比，我们看不到选择 15S Pro 的明确理由。

Pros

+ 电池寿命长

+ 优质的外观和触感

+ 强大的 SoC

+ 快速充电

+ 明亮的 1440p 显示屏

Cons

- 可用性有限（无 eSIM 等）

- 不能保证软件更新

- 高热输出

价格和供应情况

小米 15S Pro 目前在中国市场独家发售。标准配置包括 16 GB LPDDR5T 内存和 512 GB UFS 4.1 存储空间，售价为 5499 日元（约合 680 欧元或 765 美元）。

在我们的贷款合作伙伴深圳贸易公司，价格从开始，约合 700 欧元约合 820 美元。目前还不清楚这款新旗舰手机是否会在欧洲或美国正式发布。

$3.99

AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Screen Protector Compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro Privacy Glass Full Coverage Anti Spy Tempered Glass Protective Film Anti-scratch Black&2

$6.99
GANGANPRO 1 Pack HD Screen Protector Compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro,9H Hardness Bubble Free Anti-Scratch Private Tempered Film
$7.99
Lucyliy (3 packs) Compatible for Xiaomi 15S Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass，Case Friendly [Hardness 9H ][High definition][Anti Scratch]

结论：小米 15S Pro
小米 15S Pro 规格
机身小米智能手机防水
功能特点小米 15S Pro 支持 USB 3.2
软件：小米手机Android 15
连接性和全球导航卫星系统：小米采用 Wi-Fi 7
通话功能和语音质量：Android ，双卡双待手机
摄像头小米 15S Pro 采用徕卡品牌
配件和保修：小米智能手机包括电源适配器
输入设备和操作：小米智能手机配备 3D 超声波传感器
显示屏小米 15S Pro 采用 OLED 屏幕
性能小米采用定制的 XRing O1 SoC，性能强劲
排放：小米 15S Pro 出现明显的发热现象
电池续航时间小米手机充电非常快
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Alternatives for comparison

小米 15S Pro 是小米现有的专业版但除了新的处理器和可选的碳纤维外观外，它在很大程度上保持不变。根据小米公司的说法，其表面的纹理设计类似于龙鳞，至少这就是其名称的含义。虽然 15 Pro 配备了高通骁龙 8 精英版而 S 版本的 15 系列则使用小米自家的 XRing O1 芯片.

小米 15S Pro 规格

Xiaomi 15S Pro (15 Series)

Processor

Xiaomi Xring O1 10 x 1.8 - 3.9 GHz, Cortex-X925, A725, A520

Graphics adapter

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5T

Display

6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO, 1920Hz PWM, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 479 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G：n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79; 4G：FDD-LTE：B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE：B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G：B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.3 x 75.3

Battery

6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.4, 23 mm, 1/1.31", OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.5, 120 m, telephoto, OIS, 5x optical zoom) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, HyperOS 2, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

216 g, Power Supply: 104 g

Price

830 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身小米智能手机防水

小米 15S Pro 的设计和尺寸与标准版相同专业版.它的机身防水等级达到 IP68 标准。高品质的材料和出色的制造精度赋予了这款高端智能手机精致和复杂的感觉。15S Pro 的屏占比高达 90%，有效利用了正面面积。

背面的磨砂处理有助于最大限度地减少可见指纹。小米采用了龙晶玻璃，铝制边框与玻璃机身无缝衔接。拿在手里，15S Pro 给人的感觉是非常协调和平衡。

尺寸比较

功能特点小米 15S Pro 支持 USB 3.2

这款小米智能手机功能全面，包括 USB OTG、蓝牙 5.4、NFC、红外爆破器和 UWB 芯片。它还包括一个 3.2 Gen 2 规格的高速 USB 端口，支持有线视频输出。据制造商称，生物识别信息和密码等敏感数据由设备内置的专用内部安全芯片保护。

软件：小米手机Android 15

小米 15S Pro 搭载了第二代 HyperOS，并通过了 Play Protect 认证。小米对中国市场的软件更新政策仍然含糊其辞。在测试时，该设备运行的是 2025 年 5 月的安全补丁。

该制造商的中国机型通常不支持谷歌服务。取而代之的是小米自己的生态系统和中国本地服务。

不过，该机预装了谷歌框架，这意味着用户只需通过小米应用商店手动安装 Play Store 即可。系统语言可设置为中文或英文。没有德语语言包，这对于考虑进口的德语用户来说可能是一个缺点。

可持续性

小米 15S Pro 的包装由纸板制成，设备本身则用纸张包裹。小米没有提供有关所用材料及其回收率的详细信息，但该公司表示，它正在其所有智能手机中增加使用可回收材料。

连接性和全球导航卫星系统：小米采用 Wi-Fi 7

虽然 15S Pro 不太可能在全球发布，但它广泛支持 5G 和 4G 移动网络频段。它支持德语地区的所有相关频段，因此可以进口。

小米智能手机配备了 Wi-Fi 7，在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试时，峰值传输速度高达 1,800 Mbps。这得益于该设备在 6 GHz 频段的运行能力。不过，测试中的上传速度明显较低。

Networking
Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	508 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1524 (min: 1222) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼75%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1038 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1119 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1190 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	722 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	735 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1396 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%

Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø508 (412-574)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1830 (1666-1889)

Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1524 (1222-1653)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1387-1829)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (858-990)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (680-916)

为了评估真实世界的定位精度，我们使用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了一条较短的骑行路线进行比较。来自小米智能手机的路线数据在细节上出现了一些小偏差，但总体上提供了准确的位置跟踪。

得益于对卫星系统的双频支持，定位不仅高度精确（精度约为两米），而且非常快速。

通话功能和语音质量：Android ，双卡双待手机

小米 15S Pro 配备了四个麦克风，支持两张实体 nano SIM 卡。不过，该设备支持 VoLTE 和国内 Wi-Fi 网络通话。

语音质量不错，声音再现清晰，音量适中。

摄像头小米 15S Pro 采用徕卡品牌

带有徕卡品牌标识的后置三摄像头设置与专业版.5000 万像素主摄像头采用 1/1.31 英寸传感器，具有光学防抖功能。该摄像头细节丰富，捕捉速度极快。不过，色彩准确度偶尔会出现偏差，在这个价位上可能会令人失望。

徕卡潜望镜镜头具有 5000 万像素分辨率和 OIS 功能，可实现 5 倍无损变焦，即使放大 10 倍也能保持良好的清晰度。14 毫米超广角摄像头的成像质量稍逊一筹，不过总体成像质量在该价位产品中仍可接受。

视频录制支持杜比视界和 HDR10+。可拍摄每秒 30 帧的 8K 画面，或每秒 60 帧的 UHD 画面。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修：小米智能手机包括电源适配器

包装盒包括一个 90 瓦快速充电器、一个保护套和一条 USB 数据线。此外，还预装了屏幕保护膜。我们从深圳贸易公司购买的评测样品还附带了一个欧盟电源适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器，这扩大了中国版本的标准内容。

进口设备提供 12 个月的保修.这仅适用于我们从深圳贸易公司购买的评测机，可能会因购买国家不同而有所差异。如需保修，可将退货寄往零售商提供的德国送货地址。

输入设备和操作：小米智能手机配备 3D 超声波传感器

即使在触摸屏的边缘，OLED 显示屏上的输入也能快速、精确地记录下来。制造商规定触摸采样率高达 300 Hz。15S Pro 整机操作流畅，X 轴振动电机提供清晰的触觉反馈。

在身份验证方面，小米智能手机采用了集成在显示屏中的 3D 超声波指纹传感器，可以可靠地识别注册的指纹。此外还提供生物人脸识别功能，但只能通过相对不安全的 2D 人脸解锁功能实现。

显示屏小米 15S Pro 采用 OLED 屏幕

15S Pro 的 6.73 英寸显示屏支持 120 Hz 刷新率，提供清晰的 1440p 分辨率。得益于 LTPO 技术，小米手机可以将刷新率降至 1 Hz，以节省电量。

在我们的测试中，使用逼真的 APL18 模式，面板达到了 3,142 cd/m² 的峰值亮度，非常接近宣传的 3,200 尼特最大值。

与典型的 OLED 显示屏一样，小米使用 PWM 控制亮度。按照制造商的说法，该设备的 PWM 频率高达 1,920 Hz。不过，我们观察到基线闪烁频率约为 90 Hz。示波器测量显示，整个亮度范围内的振幅一致。


955 cd/m²	976 cd/m²	962 cd/m²
964 cd/m²	983 cd/m²	951 cd/m²
946 cd/m²	910 cd/m²	894 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 983 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 949 cd/m² Minimum: 1.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 993 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.07 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233
CCT: 7224 K

	Xiaomi 15S Pro 3200x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi 15 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Oppo Find X8 Pro AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Google Pixel 9 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Screen		23%	20%	39%	69%
Brightness middle	983	1016 3%	1371 39%	1167 19%	2083 112%
Brightness	949	1017 7%	1370 44%	1160 22%	2016 112%
Brightness Distribution	91	98 8%	96 5%	98 8%	84 -8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.07	1.15 44%	2.7 -30%	0.87 58%	0.7 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.24	3.57 32%	4.2 20%	1.64 69%	2 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	1.9 42%	2 39%	1.4 58%	1.1 67%
Gamma	2.233 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.03 ^108%	2.311 ^95%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7224 ^90%	6677 ^97%	6450 ^101%	6426 ^101%	6560 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

91.4 Hz
Amplitude: 38 %

The display backlight flickers at 91.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 91.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8316 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下振幅的放大版本）。

显示设置的范围之广令人印象深刻。除了各种色彩配置文件外，用户还可以调节色温和微调个别参数。在 "Original Pro "配置文件中，色彩偏差几乎不明显。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
18.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

在户外，15S Pro 给人留下了深刻的印象。即使在阳光直射下，显示内容依然清晰可见。视角稳定性也非常出色，无可挑剔。

性能小米采用定制的 XRing O1 SoC，性能强劲

XRing O1 芯片 XRing O1 芯片采用 3 纳米工艺制造，主频高达 3.9 GHz。在 Geekbench 中，小米 CPU 的性能与骁龙 8 精英版Pro 型号中的骁龙 8 Elite 小米 15 Pro仍略胜一筹。

图形处理由集成的不死鸟 G925处理，它在 GPU 基准测试中显示出强劲的性能，无需在竞争中退避三舍。虽然 15S Pro 的性能没有超过 Galaxy S25 Ultra在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 测试中，它仍能在 4K 分辨率下达到 50 FPS。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3136 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3089 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2985 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (2667 - 2985, n=3)	2790 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	2605 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1971 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)	1635 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10029 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9404 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	9250 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (8563 - 9250, n=3)	8970 Points -3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	7480 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4820 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)	4736 Points -49%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2611586 Points +5%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (2415643 - 2599957, n=3)	2500911 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2487133 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	2374537 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2271821 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)	1351601 Points -46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1139380 Points -54%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20673 Points +34%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18231 Points +18%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (15372 - 16503, n=3)	15774 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	15446 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)	14387 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	12314 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	11823 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2674 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2309 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2276 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (1873 - 2276, n=3)	2101 Points -8%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	1145 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=139, last 2 years)	1056 Points -54%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1021 Points -55%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13223 Points +10%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	11988 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (9239 - 11988, n=3)	10868 Points -9%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	10697 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9067 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	7716 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=148, last 2 years)	7167 Points -40%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17481 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	15799 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	14976 Points -5%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (12398 - 15799, n=3)	14532 Points -8%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	12891 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)	10929 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	8029 Points -49%
Memory
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	20652 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (11611 - 20652, n=3)	16433 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	16264 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	10197 Points -51%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	9432 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)	8093 Points -61%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	7873 Points -62%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	56004 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45691 Points +61%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	44154 Points +55%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (28099 - 29401, n=3)	28634 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	28402 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)	23437 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	23041 Points -19%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2353 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2232 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (1791 - 2273, n=3)	2099 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	1923 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1879 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)	1643 Points -26%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1278 Points -43%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	75143 Points +256%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	36578 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23141 Points +10%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (19983 - 23087, n=3)	21386 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	21254 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	21087 Points
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=140, last 2 years)	19227 Points -9%

AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	51509 Points +2499%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)	26880 Points +1256%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (1934 - 2087, n=3)	2001 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1987 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	1982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1891 Points -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1146 Points -42%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=41, last 2 years)	911 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	245 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	10739 Points +1508%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10534 Points +1477%
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=58, last 2 years)	4298 Points +543%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1112 Points +66%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	668 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (558 - 668, n=3)	612 Points -8%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6885 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6521 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6294 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5383 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2605 Points -59%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7029 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6567 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6311 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6303 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2547 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26616 Points +19%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	25431 Points +14%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22298 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9476 Points -58%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12400 Points +29%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	11654 Points +21%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9604 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9461 Points -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12747 Points +33%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	11589 Points +21%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9594 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9553 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2602 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2525 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2458 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1998 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1026 Points -58%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2698 Points +10%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2576 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2443 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2054 Points -16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1001 Points -59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	818 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	763 fps -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	744 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	697 fps -15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	415 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	469 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	450 fps +21%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	423 fps +14%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	371 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	245 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	341 fps +14%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	308 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	299 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	283 fps -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	165 fps -45%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -55%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	209 fps +15%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	182 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	172 fps -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +26%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps +12%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	95 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -37%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	104 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98 fps -6%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -36%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	286 fps +12%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	276 fps +8%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	255 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	247 fps -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -53%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	48 fps -4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	41 fps -18%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -60%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)	265 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (239 - 265, n=3)	253 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 401, n=27, last 2 years)	190.4 Points -28%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	29 runs/min +100%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	28.9 runs/min +99%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	16.3 runs/min +12%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (14.5 - 16.9, n=3)	15.9 runs/min +10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	15.8 runs/min +9%
Xiaomi 15S Pro	14.5 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=107, last 2 years)	12.8 runs/min -12%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	255 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	239 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)	196 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (182 - 198, n=3)	192 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	147 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=146, last 2 years)	134.7 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	106 Points -46%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	98817 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	84676 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro	81076 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (75849 - 81322, n=3)	79416 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	60987 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	60566 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	45541 Points -44%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)	1256 ms * -150%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	699 ms * -39%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	625.4 ms * -24%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (502 - 621, n=3)	558 ms * -11%
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chromne 137)	502.34 ms *
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	423.11 ms * +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	388.7 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi 15S Pro	Xiaomi 15 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25+	Oppo Find X8 Pro	Google Pixel 9 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	-20%	-27%	-64%	-9%	-43%
Sequential Read 256KB	3786.34	3998.65 6%	4057.35 7%	3482.9 -8%	1717.9 -55%	3966 ?(3754 - 4110, n=11) 5%	2181 ?(270 - 4370, n=187, last 2 years) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB	3649.81	3673.38 1%	3311.02 -9%	3498.5 -4%	253.53 -93%	3550 ?(3095 - 3894, n=11) -3%	1791 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=187, last 2 years) -51%
Random Read 4KB	422.84	409.67 -3%	294.51 -30%	375.7 -11%	218.41 -48%	376 ?(296 - 475, n=11) -11%	295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=187, last 2 years) -30%
Random Write 4KB	677.95	555.55 -18%	351.16 -48%	100.4 -85%	261.55 -61%	511 ?(309 - 678, n=11) -25%	342 ?(9.4 - 964, n=187, last 2 years) -50%

Xiaomi 15S Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø113.8 (105-120)

Xiaomi 15S Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.6 (52-61)

Xiaomi 15S Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.5 (52-61)

Xiaomi 15S Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.6 (52-61)

Xiaomi 15S Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放：小米 15S Pro 出现明显的发热现象

温度

表面温度相对较高。不过，在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中，15S Pro 的性能仅有 10% 至 15% 左右的适度下降。

Max. Load

Idle


46.1 °C	46.2 °C	42.8 °C
47.6 °C	45.3 °C	43.3 °C
48.2 °C	46.6 °C	43 °C

Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 45.5 °C


40.3 °C	44.5 °C	44.5 °C
41.2 °C	43.9 °C	45 °C
42.3 °C	44.7 °C	45.7 °C

Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 43.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.3 % +3%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	89.8 %
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75.3 % -16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.6 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -41%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	86.4 %
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75.8 % -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.3 % -20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 % -33%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -41%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	87.4 %
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.8 % -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.9 % -33%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.5 % -36%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84.3 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77.3 % -8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.5 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.5 % -21%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 % -28%

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.1 (31.1-36)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø99.6 (96.9-107.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.9 (28.8-32.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø16.2 (15.8-18.8)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)

发言人

小米智能手机采用双扬声器设置，音质令人印象深刻。虽然粉红噪声测试显示频率响应有些不均匀，但还是有轻微的低音。对于外部音频输出，用户可以通过 USB 端口（有线）或蓝牙 5.4（无线）进行连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 15S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间小米手机充电非常快

耗电量

15S Pro 采用新一代电池，阳极结合了硅和碳。6100 毫安时电池支持 90 瓦特的 USB-C 快速充电或 50 瓦特的无线充电。在我们的测试中，使用升压模式充电仅需 55 分钟左右。

该设备在空闲和负载状态下都表现出高效的功耗。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Load	6.3 / 9.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh	Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh	Average Xiaomi Xring O1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		17%	-22%	17%	-12%	-165%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.6 25%	0.45 44%	0.6 25%	0.59 26%	3.63 ?(0.8 - 5.6, n=3) -354%	0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=156, last 2 years) -9%
Idle Average *	1.4	0.9 36%	1.09 22%	0.8 43%	1.1 21%	4.1 ?(1.4 - 6.1, n=3) -193%	1.43 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=156, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.1 35%	1.13 34%	0.9 47%	1.2 29%	4.57 ?(1.7 - 6.8, n=3) -169%	1.592 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=156, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	6.3	6.7 -6%	14.41 -129%	6.8 -8%	7.15 -13%	9.73 ?(6.3 - 11.9, n=3) -54%	7.18 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) -14%
Load Maximum *	9.1	9.5 -4%	16.37 -80%	10.9 -20%	20.37 -124%	13.9 ?(9.1 - 16.8, n=3) -53%	10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=141, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.3 (1.352-9.01)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.92 (8.78-8.97)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

电池寿命

在校准显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中，15S Pro 的续航时间超过了 25 小时，运行时间非常出色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)		25h 26min

	Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh	Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	1526	1444 -5%	1189 -22%	1411 -8%	1017 -33%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 15S Pro 是一款出色的智能手机，不过它不太可能在欧洲正式发布。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi 15S Pro - 06/26/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

69 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

94%

Display

90%

Games Performance

52 / 55 → 95%

Application Performance

76 / 85 → 89%

AI Performance

46%

Temperature

79%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

82%

Average

69%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
35%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
96%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
60%

Total Sustainability Score: 48.5%

Alternatives for comparison

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.8%	Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $3.99 AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $6.99 GANGANPRO 1 Pack HD Screen P... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 packs) Compatible... List Price: 830€	216 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI
2. 89.9%	Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $20.95 IPG Made for Xiaomi 15 Pro H... 2. $8.99 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom... 3. $3.99 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... List Price: 810€	213 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED
3. 88.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $16.99 S25 S24 S23 S22 Ultra Samsun... 3. $16.99 Super Fast Charger Type C, 2... List Price: 1149 Euro	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 87.3%	Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $5.57 GANGANPRO 1 Pack Privacy Scr... 3. $6.37 [1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Pr... List Price: 1199€	215 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED
5. 85.7%	Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: 1. $929.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke... 2. $1,199.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un... 3. $599.00 Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...	199 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 495 PPI OLED

小米 15S Pro 评测：旗舰智能手机的新独立性和强大电池续航能力

没有 Snapdragon 8 Elite，旗舰智能手机能成功吗？

结论：小米 15S Pro

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

小米 15S Pro 规格

机身小米智能手机防水

尺寸比较

功能特点小米 15S Pro 支持 USB 3.2

软件：小米手机Android 15

可持续性

连接性和全球导航卫星系统：小米采用 Wi-Fi 7

通话功能和语音质量：Android ，双卡双待手机

摄像头小米 15S Pro 采用徕卡品牌

配件和保修：小米智能手机包括电源适配器

输入设备和操作：小米智能手机配备 3D 超声波传感器

显示屏小米 15S Pro 采用 OLED 屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能小米采用定制的 XRing O1 SoC，性能强劲

排放：小米 15S Pro 出现明显的发热现象

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi 15S Pro audio analysis

Google Pixel 9 Pro audio analysis

电池续航时间小米手机充电非常快

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Alternatives for comparison

More articles related to this device

Transparency