关于摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 的结论
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 在很多方面都做得很好。由于配备了光学变焦的三摄像头、高性能的联发科 Dimensity 8350、非常明亮的显示屏和超长的电池续航时间,它可以轻松地与中端竞争产品相抗衡。此外,它还拥有快速 WiFi 6E、充足的存储空间和多种蓝牙编解码器等优势。全套配置的价格也很公道。
Edge 60 Pro 备受诟病的一点是更新供应问题,因为它将于 2029 年停止供应。如果你真的用力按摩托罗拉手机,它的温度也会让人不舒服。而更便宜的 Edge 60 Pro 却不会出现这种情况。尽管 Edge 60 Pro 的 SoC 处理速度稍慢,电池续航时间也较短,但由于其摄像头和内存功能非常相似,它也确实是 Edge 60 Pro 的替代品。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Edge 60 Pro 在摩托罗拉网店的售价为 600 欧元(约合 706 美元)。您可以在其他在线零售商处以更低的价格购买到这款智能手机,例如亚马逊,价格远低于 550 欧元(约合 648 美元)。
Table of Contents
- 关于摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 的结论
- 规格
- 外壳 - Edge 60 Pro,带 AI 按钮和 Pantone 颜色
- 功能 - 摩托罗拉手机内存大
- 软件 -Android 15,带 Moto AI,更新至 2029 年
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 WiFi 6E 的 Edge 60 Pro
- 电话功能和语音质量
- 摄像头 - 三摄像头,3 倍光学变焦
- 配件和保修 - 90 瓦电源需额外付费
- 输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹传感器
- 显示屏 - P-OLED 屏幕,亮度超过 4000 尼特
- 性能 - 配备联发科 SoC 的摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
- 游戏 - 60 FPS 很逼真
- 排放 - 持续负载下明显发热
- 电池续航时间 - Edge 60 Pro 配备 6000 毫安时电池,续航能力强
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 对可能的替代品进行比较
Edge 60 Pro 是摩托罗拉 Edge 系列中的顶级产品,其性能比上一代产品要好得多。与 Edge 50 Pro取消了潜望镜变焦功能,但在候选测试机中又恢复了这一功能。尽管 Edge 60 Pro 的硬件性能更好,但价格也要低得多。我们将在测试中了解这款中端智能手机在竞争中的表现。
规格
外壳 - Edge 60 Pro,带 AI 按钮和 Pantone 颜色
Edge 60 Pro 重 186 克(约 6.6 盎司),采用橡胶后盖,表面质感极佳,握持非常舒适。IP69 认证也使这款曲面智能手机具有防水和防尘功能。左侧长条形的 AI 按钮可启动摩托罗拉内部的 Moto AI。
在蓝色变体Dazzling Blue 中,后盖模仿尼龙纹理,而我们的测试设备(Sparkling Grape) ,则是鲜艳的紫色,第三种更微妙的变体Shadow都采用了人造皮革表面处理。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 摩托罗拉手机内存大
Edge 60 Pro 拥有 12GB 内存和 512GB 大容量存储,内存配置不错,官方售价为 600 欧元(约合 706 美元)。与 Edge 60无法使用 microSD 卡扩展内置内存。
软件 -Android 15,带 Moto AI,更新至 2029 年
可持续性
摩托罗拉为 Edge 60 Pro 选择了无塑料包装,包装采用大豆油墨印刷,由符合 FSC Mix 认证的可回收材料制成。
摩托罗拉在其网站上提供了有关其可持续发展努力的全面信息,但没有提供有关智能手机碳足迹的信息。网站上没有提供备件和自我维修说明。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 WiFi 6E 的 Edge 60 Pro
Edge 60 Pro 支持 WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC。它在手机频率方面的定位也很准确,因此即使在其他欧盟国家旅行,也不会有任何接收问题。
通过我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,Edge 60 Pro 实现了相当稳定的 Wi-Fi 传输速率,峰值达到 1574 MB/s。
Networking | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
OnePlus 13R | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量
Edge 60 Pro 的卡槽可插入一张 nano SIM 卡,还可激活 eSIM 卡,实现双卡双待。除 VoLTE 外,该手机还支持 Wi-Fi 通话。
摩托罗拉智能手机的语音质量令人印象深刻。即使在免提模式下,声音仍然清晰易懂,而且噪音抑制功能运行可靠。
摄像头 - 三摄像头,3 倍光学变焦
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
DaylightDaylightUltra wide-angleLow light在测试实验室中,主摄像头显示它能在最佳光线下准确捕捉色彩。不过,绿色色调的准确度有所欠缺。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下,测试图仍可完全识别。


配件和保修 - 90 瓦电源需额外付费
交货包括一条 USB-C 数据线、一个塑料保护盖、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 在美国提供标准的一年有限保修。可选计划 Moto Care Accident Protection 可以扩展意外损坏的保障范围。
输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹传感器
显示屏 - P-OLED 屏幕,亮度超过 4000 尼特
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.031
Motorola Edge 60 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Google Pixel 9 OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Edge 50 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | OnePlus 13R AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi 14T AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 31% | -16% | -0% | -8% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 1099 | 2063 88% | 1064 -3% | 1213 10% | 1211 10% | 1012 -8% |
Brightness | 1073 | 1914 78% | 1038 -3% | 1206 12% | 1214 13% | 1016 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 88 -3% | 97 7% | 99 9% | 95 4% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.25 | 0.7 44% | 1.17 6% | 1 20% | 1.6 -28% | 0.7 44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.68 | 2.2 -31% | 2.47 -47% | 2.3 -37% | 2.4 -43% | 1.8 -7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.2 14% | 2 -43% | 1.6 -14% | 1.5 -7% | 1.2 14% |
Gamma | 2.031 108% | 2.23 99% | 2.238 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6403 102% | 6524 100% | 6423 101% | 6546 99% | 6456 101% | 6489 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 715.7 Hz Amplitude: 75 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 715.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 715.7 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
18.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 17.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
性能 - 配备联发科 SoC 的摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
配备 联发科 Dimensity 8350Edge 60 Pro 在性能方面与同价位的智能手机相比毫不逊色。这款摩托罗拉手机在人工智能计算方面表现尤为出色。在安兔兔 v10 等权威基准测试中,它以 1,409,057 分的成绩远远落后于 骁龙 8 代 3的 一加 13R(1,772,142 分)。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (58543 - 63113, n=2) | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
Geekbench AI | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4367 - 4532, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4364 - 4545, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (1068 - 1140, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13R |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (1070 - 4443, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (111.4 - 138.7, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (158 - 192, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (115 - 148, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (38258 - 49086, n=4) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (847 - 1088, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | Google Pixel 9 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro | OnePlus 13R | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | Xiaomi 14T | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -64% | -51% | -9% | -61% | -11% | -14% | -44% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3852.89 | 1584.56 -59% | 1023.6 -73% | 3987.44 3% | 1783.43 -54% | 3605.16 -6% | 3679 ? -5% | 2137 ? -45% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3842.42 | 256.48 -93% | 1025.9 -73% | 3201.32 -17% | 631.23 -84% | 3294.31 -14% | 3102 ? -19% | 1734 ? -55% |
Random Read 4KB | 439.58 | 226.41 -48% | 337 -23% | 374.54 -15% | 312.98 -29% | 403.97 -8% | 382 ? -13% | 292 ? -34% |
Random Write 4KB | 585.66 | 266.19 -55% | 390.2 -33% | 542.13 -7% | 127.53 -78% | 493.57 -16% | 469 ? -20% | 337 ? -42% |
游戏 - 60 FPS 很逼真
配备了 ARM Mali-G615 MP6-图形处理器, Edge 60 Pro实现了良好的 3D 性能。虽然无法与 一加 13R或 三星Galaxy S24 FE通过Gamebench 测得的帧率显示,其性能足以流畅地玩当前的游戏,即使是高细节游戏也不在话下。
排放 - 持续负载下明显发热
温度
在燃烧基准压力测试中,Edge 60 Pro 的温度高达 58.4 °C(137.12 °F),令人非常不舒服。不过,这种极端情况在日常使用中仍属例外。
在 3DMark 压力测试中,Edge 60 Pro 可以在较长时间内保持输出性能,但随后会急剧下降。经过 20 次测试后,仅剩下不到 40% 的原始性能。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.7 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro |
发言人
底部边缘的扬声器由听筒放大,这意味着 Edge 60 Pro 可以产生立体声音效。虽然基本上没有低音,但由于中高音相对平衡,听起来还是不错的。
耳机或外置扬声器可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接。Edge 60 Pro 支持当前大多数蓝牙编解码器。
Motorola Edge 60 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - Edge 60 Pro 配备 6000 毫安时电池,续航能力强
能源消耗
Edge 60 Pro 的 6000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 90 瓦。通过无线充电,功率可达 15 瓦。
我们在测试时没有摩托罗拉的 90 瓦电源,因此使用了 Anker 317 代替(100 瓦)。不过,Edge 60 Pro 对此并不满意,因为一个充电周期需要 1.5 小时,时间太长了。如果智能手机和电源适配器兼容,充电应该在一小时内完成。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh | Google Pixel 9 4700 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus 13R 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 4700 mAh | Xiaomi 14T 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 39% | 11% | 10% | 37% | -35% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 0.66 49% | 0.9 31% | 0.81 38% | 0.78 40% | 0.97 25% | 1.28 ? 2% | 0.873 ? 33% |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.49 22% | 1.3 32% | 2.11 -11% | 1.31 31% | 1.12 41% | 3.74 ? -97% | 1.427 ? 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.4 | 1.78 26% | 1.6 33% | 2.17 10% | 1.36 43% | 1.19 50% | 4.01 ? -67% | 1.59 ? 34% |
Load Average * | 8.6 | 7.44 13% | 4.8 44% | 9.2 -7% | 13.23 -54% | 4.13 52% | 10.3 ? -20% | 7.14 ? 17% |
Load Maximum * | 14.9 | 16.64 -12% | 6.7 55% | 11.12 25% | 16.23 -9% | 12.25 18% | 14.1 ? 5% | 10.8 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 的性价比很高,尤其是大容量电池和非常明亮的曲面显示屏。
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
- 07/03/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
对可能的替代品进行比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.