Notebookcheck Logo
Motorola Edge 60 Pro

续航能力强、性价比高的轻量级曲面智能手机 - 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 评测

一件珠宝

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 具备许多通常只有昂贵得多的智能手机才具备的功能，并将这些功能装进了一个高品质的外壳中，同时还具有手感舒适的特点。其中包括 6000 毫安时电池和亮度超过 4000 尼特的曲面显示屏。此外还有 90 瓦的快速充电功能。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

关于摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 的结论

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 在很多方面都做得很好。由于配备了光学变焦的三摄像头、高性能的联发科 Dimensity 8350、非常明亮的显示屏和超长的电池续航时间，它可以轻松地与中端竞争产品相抗衡。此外，它还拥有快速 WiFi 6E、充足的存储空间和多种蓝牙编解码器等优势。全套配置的价格也很公道。

Edge 60 Pro 备受诟病的一点是更新供应问题，因为它将于 2029 年停止供应。如果你真的用力按摩托罗拉手机，它的温度也会让人不舒服。而更便宜的 Edge 60 Pro 却不会出现这种情况。尽管 Edge 60 Pro 的 SoC 处理速度稍慢，电池续航时间也较短，但由于其摄像头和内存功能非常相似，它也确实是 Edge 60 Pro 的替代品。

Pros

+ 非常明亮的 120 Hz OLED 屏幕
+ 高质量外壳，防护等级 IP69
+ 512 GB 存储空间
+ 支持 eSIM 卡
+ 出色的三摄像头
+ 3 倍光学变焦
+ 出色的电池续航能力
+ 高达 90 瓦的快速充电
+ 多种蓝牙编解码器

Cons

- 只能更新到 2029 年
- 无 microSD 插槽
- 交货范围内无电源适配器
- 有时工作温度较高

价格和供应情况

Edge 60 Pro 在摩托罗拉网店的售价为 600 欧元（约合 706 美元）。您可以在其他在线零售商处以更低的价格购买到这款智能手机，例如亚马逊，价格远低于 550 欧元（约合 648 美元）。

Amazon Logo
$7.29
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible with Motorola Edge 2025/Moto Edge 60 Fusion/60 Pro Screen Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Moto Edge 2025 Screen Protector
  • $9.88
    Foebxxs [2 Pack Hydrogel Flexible Screen Protector for Motorola Edge 60 Pro, Upgraded Non-breakable HD Clarity Soft TPU Protective Film [Anti-Scratch] [Bubble Free] [High Sensitivity] (Not Glass)
  • $7.59
    Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible with Motorola Moto Edge 60 Fusion/Moto Edge 60 Pro/Moto Edge 60/Edge 60S Screen Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free
Bestpreis 583.97 € Jacob Elektronik direkt
Motorola Edge 60 Pro PANTONE Sparkling Grape
2. 583.99 € x-kom
3. 586.12 € Full Line
4. 588.88 € Jacob Elektronik direkt (AT)

Edge 60 Pro 是摩托罗拉 Edge 系列中的顶级产品，其性能比上一代产品要好得多。与 Edge 50 Pro取消了潜望镜变焦功能，但在候选测试机中又恢复了这一功能。尽管 Edge 60 Pro 的硬件性能更好，但价格也要低得多。我们将在测试中了解这款中端智能手机在竞争中的表现。

规格

Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Edge 60 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, Peak Brightness 4500 nits, Touch sampling rate up to 300 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 479 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Magnetometer (e-Compass), Miracast, Camera2 API Full, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/11/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/43/66/71), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/38/40/41/66/71/75/77/78), Nano-SIM + eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.2 x 73
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90W max. charging speed
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony LYTIA 700C, f/1.8, OIS) + 50 MPix Ultrawide (f/2.0, 120°, AF, Macro) + 10 MPix Tele (f/2.0, 3x optical zoom, 50x digital zoom, OIS, AF)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB Type-C to USB Type-C cable, Guides, SIM tool, protective case, 24 Months Warranty, IP69/IP68 certified, MIL-STD 810H certified, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (front), silicone finish (back); HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B2a), QZSS; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V2-V5; SAR: Head SAR 0.9 W/kg, Body SAR 1.39 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
186 g
Price
600 Euro
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - Edge 60 Pro，带 AI 按钮和 Pantone 颜色

Edge 60 Pro 重 186 克（约 6.6 盎司），采用橡胶后盖，表面质感极佳，握持非常舒适。IP69 认证也使这款曲面智能手机具有防水和防尘功能。左侧长条形的 AI 按钮可启动摩托罗拉内部的 Moto AI。

在蓝色变体Dazzling Blue 中，后盖模仿尼龙纹理，而我们的测试设备（Sparkling Grape） ，则是鲜艳的紫色，第三种更微妙的变体Shadow都采用了人造皮革表面处理。

尺寸比较

❌
162 mm 77.3 mm 8 mm 213 g161.72 mm 75.77 mm 8.02 mm 206 g161.2 mm 73 mm 8.2 mm 186 g161.2 mm 72.4 mm 8.2 mm 186 g160.5 mm 75.1 mm 7.8 mm 195 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 摩托罗拉手机内存大

Edge 60 Pro 拥有 12GB 内存和 512GB 大容量存储，内存配置不错，官方售价为 600 欧元（约合 706 美元）。与 Edge 60无法使用 microSD 卡扩展内置内存。

左边AI 按钮
左边AI 按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
以上：麦克风
以上：麦克风
以下：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
以下：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽

软件 -Android 15，带 Moto AI，更新至 2029 年

Edge 60 Pro 一开始使用的是Android 15，除了少量自己的应用程序外，摩托罗拉几乎没有对其进行任何改动。这款智能手机可获得 3 次操作系统升级和 4 年的安全更新。不过，与谷歌和三星等竞争对手提供的支持（分别为 6 年和 7 年）相比，这并不算长。

摩托罗拉的内部人工智能 Moto AI 可以总结信息、转录录音，并将笔记与屏幕截图和照片一起保存。此外，还包括谷歌双子座和谷歌搜索圈。使用 Moto AI 需要摩托罗拉账户。

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro

可持续性

摩托罗拉为 Edge 60 Pro 选择了无塑料包装，包装采用大豆油墨印刷，由符合 FSC Mix 认证的可回收材料制成。

摩托罗拉在其网站上提供了有关其可持续发展努力的全面信息，但没有提供有关智能手机碳足迹的信息。网站上没有提供备件和自我维修说明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 WiFi 6E 的 Edge 60 Pro

Edge 60 Pro 支持 WiFi 6E、蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC。它在手机频率方面的定位也很准确，因此即使在其他欧盟国家旅行，也不会有任何接收问题。

通过我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Edge 60 Pro 实现了相当稳定的 Wi-Fi 传输速率，峰值达到 1574 MB/s。

Networking
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼85%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼58%
OnePlus 13R
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1768) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼82%
Xiaomi 14T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼84%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
843 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
827 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1195 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1250 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1382 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1393 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø990 (879-1101)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1844 (1768-1895)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1574 (1183-1632)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1511 (1431-1564)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (493-998)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø722 (680-801)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Edge 60 Pro 在导航方面表现出色。在实际测试中，我们将其与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了对比，在长约 10 公里（约 6.2 英里）的自行车路线上，智能手机经常会偏离几米，但其精确度足以满足日常使用。

GPS 测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro：概述
GPS 测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro：概述
GPS 测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro：地下通道
GPS 测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro：地下通道
全球定位系统测试摩托罗拉边缘 60 Pro：转机
全球定位系统测试摩托罗拉边缘 60 Pro：转机
Garmin Venu 2：概述
Garmin Venu 2：概述
Garmin Venu 2：地下通道
Garmin Venu 2：地下通道
Garmin Venu 2：转弯
Garmin Venu 2：转弯

电话功能和语音质量

Edge 60 Pro 的卡槽可插入一张 nano SIM 卡，还可激活 eSIM 卡，实现双卡双待。除 VoLTE 外，该手机还支持 Wi-Fi 通话。

摩托罗拉智能手机的语音质量令人印象深刻。即使在免提模式下，声音仍然清晰易懂，而且噪音抑制功能运行可靠。

摄像头 - 三摄像头，3 倍光学变焦

使用自拍相机拍摄
使用自拍相机拍摄

除了 5000 万像素主摄像头和 5000 万像素超广角摄像头外，Edge 60 Pro 还配备了一个 1000 万像素长焦摄像头。后者具有 3 倍光学变焦，在日光下也能拍摄出不错的照片。数码变焦最高可达 50 倍，但在更高倍率下只能捕捉到相当模糊的细节。

主摄像头和超广角摄像头拍摄的照片细节丰富，对比度高，质量非常好。5000 万像素的自拍摄像头也是如此，在同价位产品中名列前茅。这款智能手机还能录制质量上乘的视频，但最高只能录制 30 FPS 的 4K 视频。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

DaylightDaylightUltra wide-angleLow light

在测试实验室中，主摄像头显示它能在最佳光线下准确捕捉色彩。不过，绿色色调的准确度有所欠缺。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，测试图仍可完全识别。

ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
20 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Pro: 9.77 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 19.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
33 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
76.7 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
85.8 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Pro: 45.87 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 85.82 ∆E

配件和保修 - 90 瓦电源需额外付费

交货包括一条 USB-C 数据线、一个塑料保护盖、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 在美国提供标准的一年有限保修。可选计划 Moto Care Accident Protection 可以扩展意外损坏的保障范围。

输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹传感器

P-OLED 屏幕能对输入做出快速而精确的响应，再加上 12GB RAM 和联发科 SoC，可确保非常流畅的操作。

屏幕下方的指纹传感器能快速解锁智能手机，在测试中没有出现任何错误。通过自拍摄像头进行的 2D 人脸识别也运行可靠。

键盘向上
键盘向上
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - P-OLED 屏幕，亮度超过 4000 尼特

子像素
子像素

据摩托罗拉称，P-OLED 屏幕的最大亮度为 4500 尼特。在测试中，该屏幕并没有达到这个亮度，但在小表面上仍然达到了 4122 cd/m²（APL18 测量值）的出色亮度。平均值为 1099 cd/m²。

在我们测量的所有亮度级别中，P-OLED 屏幕的直流调光频率都相对较高，为 716 Hz。由于信号振幅高达 75%，对 PWM 比较敏感的用户可能仍然会受到 PWM 闪烁的干扰。

1102
cd/m²		1034
cd/m²		1066
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²		1099
cd/m²		1025
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²		1088
cd/m²		1054
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1121 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1072.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.031
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"		Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		OnePlus 13R
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
31%
-16%
-0%
-8%
7%
Brightness middle
1099
2063
88%
1064
-3%
1213
10%
1211
10%
1012
-8%
Brightness
1073
1914
78%
1038
-3%
1206
12%
1214
13%
1016
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
88
-3%
97
7%
99
9%
95
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.25
0.7
44%
1.17
6%
1
20%
1.6
-28%
0.7
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.68
2.2
-31%
2.47
-47%
2.3
-37%
2.4
-43%
1.8
-7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.2
14%
2
-43%
1.6
-14%
1.5
-7%
1.2
14%
Gamma
2.031 108%
2.23 99%
2.238 98%
2.22 99%
2.13 103%
2.19 100%
CCT
6403 102%
6524 100%
6423 101%
6546 99%
6456 101%
6489 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 715.7 Hz
Amplitude: 75 %

The display backlight flickers at 715.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 715.7 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

利用光光谱仪和 CalMAN 软件进行的分析证实了显示器的高色彩保真度。在自然色模式下，显示器显示的灰度和参考色偏差极小。

色彩保真度
色彩保真度
色彩空间
色彩空间
灰度
灰度
色彩饱和度
色彩饱和度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 17.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

在户外，Edge 60 Pro 将其明亮、可视角度稳定的显示屏优势展现得淋漓尽致。即使在阳光直射下，屏幕内容依然清晰可见。在阴暗处的可读性也没有问题。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
观点
观点

性能 - 配备联发科 SoC 的摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro

配备 联发科 Dimensity 8350Edge 60 Pro 在性能方面与同价位的智能手机相比毫不逊色。这款摩托罗拉手机在人工智能计算方面表现尤为出色。在安兔兔 v10 等权威基准测试中，它以 1,409,057 分的成绩远远落后于 骁龙 8 代 3的 一加 13R(1,772,142 分）。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2214 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
2066 Points +42%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=207, last 2 years)
1608 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1225 - 1457, n=4)
1345 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points -21%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6605 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
6341 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=207, last 2 years)
4626 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (3947 - 4616, n=4)
4232 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -32%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1772142 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1516996 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)
1335016 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1133809 - 1409057, n=2)
1271433 Points -10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
19261 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
17338 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (9907 - 19261, n=4)
16144 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
14304 Points -26%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -28%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13085 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9273 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
8827 Points +23%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (7178 - 8279, n=2)
7729 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7178 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=156, last 2 years)
7018 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points -16%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
14627 Points +78%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12637 Points +54%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points +41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=156, last 2 years)
10823 Points +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (8213 - 11001, n=2)
9607 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8213 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points -8%
Memory
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12087 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
9036 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (8146 - 9693, n=2)
8920 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8146 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=156, last 2 years)
7887 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points -30%
Graphics
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
27837 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (26099 - 28497, n=2)
27298 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
26099 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
23338 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=156, last 2 years)
22600 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1982 Points +30%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1763 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points +10%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=156, last 2 years)
1630 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1521 - 1546, n=2)
1534 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1521 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
63113 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (58543 - 63113, n=2)
60828 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points -8%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years)
18518 Points -71%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13564 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
11738 Points -81%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -86%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (4367 - 4532, n=2)
4450 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4367 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)
1868 Points -57%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
521 Points -88%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (4364 - 4545, n=2)
4455 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4364 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)
1148 Points -74%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
224 Points -95%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1068 - 1140, n=2)
1104 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1068 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)
508 Points -52%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
235 Points -78%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points +80%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4443 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=55, last 2 years)
4310 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (1070 - 4443, n=3)
3166 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
598 Points -87%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4854 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points +43%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4891 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4329 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points -1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19048 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13847 Points +28%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -50%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8398 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7948 Points +57%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8364 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7894 Points +60%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1803 Points +48%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1706 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points -15%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -16%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1821 Points +49%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1636 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps -3%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
545 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
384 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -35%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps +19%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +3%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -49%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
266 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
215 fps +19%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -8%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +30%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -5%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -24%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -61%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +23%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +54%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +68%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +66%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -9%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -6%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -60%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +25%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -54%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
182.387 Points +64%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years)
140.6 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (111.4 - 138.7, n=2)
125.1 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
115.454 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
111.429 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
70.555 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
298 runs/min +89%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min +17%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=140, last 2 years)
178.2 runs/min +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (158 - 192, n=2)
175 runs/min +11%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
158 runs/min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
147 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
117 runs/min -26%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
187 Points +63%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
136 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=153, last 2 years)
131.9 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (115 - 148, n=2)
131.5 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
64838 Points +69%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
44496 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (38258 - 49086, n=4)
43048 Points +13%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
41734 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms * -75%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years)
1325 ms * -22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms * -6%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms *
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133)
1002.6 ms * +8%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
972.4 ms * +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (847 - 1088, n=2)
967 ms * +11%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
598.12 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge 60 ProGoogle Pixel 9Motorola Edge 50 ProOnePlus 13RSamsung Galaxy S24 FEXiaomi 14TAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-64%
-51%
-9%
-61%
-11%
-14%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
3852.89
1584.56
-59%
1023.6
-73%
3987.44
3%
1783.43
-54%
3605.16
-6%
3679 ?(1851 - 4512, n=46)
-5%
2137 ?(270 - 4384, n=189, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
3842.42
256.48
-93%
1025.9
-73%
3201.32
-17%
631.23
-84%
3294.31
-14%
3102 ?(1524 - 4030, n=46)
-19%
1734 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=189, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
439.58
226.41
-48%
337
-23%
374.54
-15%
312.98
-29%
403.97
-8%
382 ?(250 - 504, n=46)
-13%
292 ?(47.6 - 504, n=189, last 2 years)
-34%
Random Write 4KB
585.66
266.19
-55%
390.2
-33%
542.13
-7%
127.53
-78%
493.57
-16%
469 ?(45.7 - 964, n=46)
-20%
337 ?(9.4 - 964, n=189, last 2 years)
-42%

游戏 - 60 FPS 很逼真

配备了 ARM Mali-G615 MP6-图形处理器， Edge 60 Pro实现了良好的 3D 性能。虽然无法与 一加 13R或 三星Galaxy S24 FE通过Gamebench 测得的帧率显示，其性能足以流畅地玩当前的游戏，即使是高细节游戏也不在话下。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø59.6 (54-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.7.0_33477673_33723678: Ø56 (47-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.8.0: Ø59.8 (58-60)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø39.9 (36-41)

排放 - 持续负载下明显发热

温度

在燃烧基准压力测试中，Edge 60 Pro 的温度高达 58.4 °C（137.12 °F），令人非常不舒服。不过，这种极端情况在日常使用中仍属例外。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，Edge 60 Pro 可以在较长时间内保持输出性能，但随后会急剧下降。经过 20 次测试后，仅剩下不到 40% 的原始性能。

Max. Load
 53.8 °C54 °C47.8 °C 
 54 °C53 °C48.7 °C 
 54.7 °C54.3 °C47.7 °C 
Maximum: 54.7 °C
Average: 52 °C
46.9 °C53.3 °C50.3 °C
47.3 °C54 °C51.5 °C
47.1 °C54.2 °C58.4 °C
Maximum: 58.4 °C
Average: 51.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.7 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 % +110%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 % +79%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % +62%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.1 % +59%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.4 % -7%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +135%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +69%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 % +60%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.8 % +49%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.5 % -11%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.4 % +54%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 %
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35.1 % -15%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +89%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.6 % +70%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % +42%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.9 (7.61-18.1)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (12-17.8)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (28.4-67.4)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (43.9-58.2)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.9 (28.2-65.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (44-65.4)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø12.7 (6.96-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø12.8 (6.91-16.7)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.2 (11.1-16.6)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.23 (3.77-9.06)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.23 (6.01-9)
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器由听筒放大，这意味着 Edge 60 Pro 可以产生立体声音效。虽然基本上没有低音，但由于中高音相对平衡，听起来还是不错的。

耳机或外置扬声器可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接。Edge 60 Pro 支持当前大多数蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.3352540.636.93131.8284029.735.65036.436.86324.321.18019.424.410022.236.112520.746.216018.852.120018.853.825019.258.131515.564.140015.360.950017.463.863024.368.480026.967.8100022.166.8125018.768160017.672.3200016.771.5250015.569315015.265.4400017.173.6500021.383.1630024.482.9800026.975.31000023.472.51250017.574.91600017.954.2SPL33.888.1N1.867.5median 18.8median 67.8Delta2.96.540.543.932.243.833.238.931.139.838.546.526.141.924.642.919.547.818.348.416.354.815.455.3146015.160.913.259.511.564.911.864.713.470.515.276.313.381.31378.512.782.313.980.714.281.21484.914.681.413.775.313.674.813.574.813.46512.658.125.991.90.786.4median 13.7median 74.8110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 60 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Edge 60 Pro 配备 6000 毫安时电池，续航能力强

能源消耗

Edge 60 Pro 的 6000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 90 瓦。通过无线充电，功率可达 15 瓦。

我们在测试时没有摩托罗拉的 90 瓦电源，因此使用了 Anker 317 代替（100 瓦）。不过，Edge 60 Pro 对此并不满意，因为一个充电周期需要 1.5 小时，时间太长了。如果智能手机和电源适配器兼容，充电应该在一小时内完成。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 8.6 / 14.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh		Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh		OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh		Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
39%
11%
10%
37%
-35%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.66
49%
0.9
31%
0.81
38%
0.78
40%
0.97
25%
1.28 ?(1.26 - 1.3, n=2)
2%
0.873 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years)
33%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.49
22%
1.3
32%
2.11
-11%
1.31
31%
1.12
41%
3.74 ?(1.9 - 5.57, n=2)
-97%
1.427 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.78
26%
1.6
33%
2.17
10%
1.36
43%
1.19
50%
4.01 ?(2.4 - 5.61, n=2)
-67%
1.59 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
34%
Load Average *
8.6
7.44
13%
4.8
44%
9.2
-7%
13.23
-54%
4.13
52%
10.3 ?(8.6 - 12, n=2)
-20%
7.14 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
17%
Load Maximum *
14.9
16.64
-12%
6.7
55%
11.12
25%
16.23
-9%
12.25
18%
14.1 ?(13.4 - 14.9, n=2)
5%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.91 (2.44-3.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.65 (0.953-6.75)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.389 (1.27-2.54)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.7 (12.4-14.9)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.17 (4.82-5.42)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.389 (1.27-2.54)
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.161 (1.066-1.56)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

电池寿命

在实际电池测试中，Edge 60 Pro 非常耐用。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间接近 22.5 小时。这不仅超越了它的前代产品，而且超越了除 一加 13R.它的 Edge 60的电池容量为 5000 毫安时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
22h 23min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
1343 min
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
990 min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
979 min
OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh
1516 min
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh
749 min
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
1091 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 的性价比很高，尤其是大容量电池和非常明亮的曲面显示屏。

Motorola Edge 60 Pro - 07/03/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 72%
Weight
90%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
27 / 55 → 48%
Application Performance
71 / 85 → 83%
AI Performance
74%
Temperature
74%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
81%
Average
67%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
77.8%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.1%

对可能的替代品进行比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 续航能力强、性价比高的轻量级曲面智能手机 - 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-07- 6 (Update: 2025-07- 6)