小米混合翻盖 2 的评价
尽管采用了可折叠设计，但 Mix Flip 2 在许多方面的性能都达到了旗舰级水平，堪称本年度最佳翻盖手机之一。小米这款小巧的可折叠手机结合了最快的智能手机 SoC 之一，具有相对较低的节流、较长的电池续航时间和明亮的自适应刷新率 LTPO OLED 面板。
不过，可折叠外形仍然需要在某些方面做出妥协，例如连接（包括 USB 2.0）和摄像头。在折叠时，我们也希望它能采用类似折叠式智能手机的纤薄设计。
这个价位的另一个缺点是小米的更新政策不明确，至少对中国市场的机型是这样。
Pros
Cons
小米混合翻盖 2 的价格和上市时间
Mix Flip 2 目前只在中国发售。配备 256 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存的基本机型售价为 6,000 元人民币，约合 720 欧元或 785 美元。作为进口机型，深圳贸易公司列出的起价约为870 欧元或 950 美元。由于第一代产品已在欧洲正式发布，因此后续产品很可能也会在全球发布。
- $8.99QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Protector for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2, Hydrogel Film [High Sensitivity, Not Glass, HD] Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Protector Film
- $6.99QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens Protector for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2, [Alloy Ring, Anti-Glare, 9H, Case-Friendly] Tempered Glass for Xiaomi Mix Flip/Flip 2 Camera Lens Cover Accessories (Color)
小米混合翻盖 2 的规格
制造与功能 -Android 各种颜色的智能手机
小米 Mix Flip 2 的出色做工给人留下了深刻印象。显示屏内部的折痕触感明显，但在日常使用中几乎感觉不到。金属边框不仅提供了高级感，还提升了手机的高端外观。尺寸与前代产品相比几乎没有变化，只是重量略有增加。
Mix Flip 2 有多种颜色可供选择。与 前代机型一样尽管到目前为止，全球版本和我们的测试机都没有确认 IP54 的防尘和防溅等级。
在功能方面，小米 Mix Flip 2 包括红外触发器、双频 GNSS、蓝牙 5.4、双 SIM 卡功能、立体声扬声器和 NFC。需要 eSIM 支持或德语界面的用户请稍候，因为中国 ROM 不支持这两项功能。
USB-C 端口是一个明显的缺点，因为它的速度仍然仅限于 USB 2.0，这在这个价位上令人失望。
与 5G 和 LTE 频段 20 的通信和运行
Mix Flip 2 配备了现代的 Wi-Fi 7，包括 MU-MIMO 支持。尽管使用的是 6 GHz 频段，但实际速度与预期略有差距。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器搭配使用时，我们测得的平均吞吐量约为 1,300 Mbit/s，虽然不错，但并不突出。
中国市场的机型已经支持 LTE 频段 20 和 28 以及各种 5G 频段。因此，对于那些不想等待全球版本的用户来说，进口该设备是一个很有吸引力的选择。
6.86 英寸可折叠内屏和 4 英寸小盖板显示屏均反应灵敏，并受益于 120 Hz 的刷新率，可确保流畅运行。前面板支持许多应用程序，包括一些第三方应用程序，但仍不能完全取代主显示屏。
在生物识别安全方面，电源键集成了快速指纹传感器，还有 2D 人脸解锁功能。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续发展 - 结构紧凑的手机，Android 15
Mix Flip 2 运行基于Android 15 的小米内部 HyperOS 2。与中国市场的典型机型一样，该软件只提供有限的语言包，而且不支持Android Auto。
关于软件更新的持续时间，我们没有提供详细信息。不过，全球版本将受益于新的 欧盟指令该指令要求软件支持至少到 2031 年。
由于没有关于所用材料或官方碳足迹的确切信息，因此很难评估智能手机对环境的总体影响。
相机 - 与 Leica 合作推出的翻盖智能手机
Mix Flip 2 得益于小米与徕卡的合作，配备了 50 百万像素的主摄像头，带有 Light Hunter 800 传感器和 OIS。这一组合可提供高动态范围和令人愉悦的清晰度，即使在具有挑战性的照明条件下也能产生良好的效果。得益于可折叠的外形，后置摄像头还可以通过盖板屏幕方便地拍摄照片和视频。
与原来的 混合翻盖不同的是，小米这次放弃了 2 倍长焦镜头，而是在 23 毫米主摄像头旁配备了一个超广角镜头。这一选择是合理的，因为在我们的测试中，前代产品的长焦镜头未能给人留下深刻印象。虽然 50-MP 超广角镜头在这个价位的相机中并不出众，但它提供了可靠的图像质量，使相机配置更加完善。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
显示屏 - 小米采用 OLED 面板
在显示屏尺寸、分辨率和刷新率方面，Mix Flip 2 与第一代产品相比保持不变。 第一代.主显示屏仍为 6.86 英寸，长宽比为 21.4:9，相当修长。
积极的一面是，在更真实的 APL18 测量中，峰值亮度达到了令人印象深刻的 2,552 cd/m²。这确保了 LTPO 面板的亮度足以提供一流的 HDR 效果。
根据制造商的说法，4.01 英寸的盖板显示屏应达到与内屏类似的亮度水平。然而，在我们的测试中，我们测得的亮度仅为 652 cd/m²。与 OLED 的典型做法一样，亮度控制采用 PWM 技术。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1077 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.11 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155
CCT: 6275 K
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mix Flip AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Honor Magic V Flip OLED, 2520x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 33% | -3% | -23% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 1077 | 1379 28% | 1210 12% | 949 -12% | 1529 42% |
| Brightness | 1036 | 1393 34% | 1221 18% | 949 -8% | 1535 48% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 93 -2% | 98 3% | 98 3% | 97 2% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.11 | 1.05 50% | 3.1 -47% | 2.1 -0% | 1.3 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.62 | 1.79 51% | 4.2 -16% | 5.6 -55% | 2.1 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.4 39% | 2 13% | 3.8 -65% | 1.5 35% |
| Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.124 104% | 2.05 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6275 104% | 6362 102% | 6666 98% | 6826 95% | 6303 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 121 Hz Amplitude: 19 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列。(最小亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下振幅的放大版本）。
使用 CalMAN 软件和分光光度计，柔性 OLED 面板显示出良好的色彩和灰度校准效果，低 DeltaE 值保持在理想范围内（<3）。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备高端处理器的翻盖手机
Mix Flip 2 采用 骁龙 8 精英版双蒸汽腔散热系统。因此，在 3DMark 压力测试中，小米手机的节流明显低于许多竞争对手。 竞争对手.在基准测试中，Mix Flip 2 甚至超过了 摩托罗拉 Razr 60 Ultra.
尽管采用了小巧的翻盖外形，电池容量却增加到了可观的 5,165 毫安时。这款可折叠手机还支持 67 W 有线充电和 50 W 无线充电。在我们的实际电池测试中，Mix Flip 2 的续航时间将近 20 小时，成为续航时间最长的翻盖手机。 翻盖手机是我们迄今为止测试过的续航时间最长的翻盖手机。用户在不充电的情况下使用一整天应该不成问题。
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | Xiaomi Mix Flip | Honor Magic V Flip | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | -22% | -3% | -46% | -6% | -41% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 4083.53 | 3504.7 -14% | 3930.68 -4% | 4063.4 0% | 1947.4 -52% | 3973 ? -3% | 2181 ? -47% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3894.12 | 3450.9 -11% | 2603.84 -33% | 3332.67 -14% | 1672.06 -57% | 3591 ? -8% | 1791 ? -54% |
| Random Read 4KB | 403.94 | 308.6 -24% | 445.5 10% | 367.24 -9% | 277.55 -31% | 374 ? -7% | 295 ? -27% |
| Random Write 4KB | 534.73 | 347 -35% | 202.97 -62% | 587.21 10% | 297.97 -44% | 506 ? -5% | 342 ? -36% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mix Flip audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 4780 mAh | Honor Magic V Flip 4800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1198 | 922 -23% | 929 -22% | 893 -25% | 1159 -3% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Mix Flip 2 是今年最受欢迎的翻盖手机之一，而且很有可能摘得桂冠。如果运气好的话，小米还将在全球市场推出该产品。
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- 08/15/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $8.99 QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $6.99 QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P... List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
2. 83.1%  | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: $1,099.99 List Price: 1299€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.00" 2992x1224 462 PPI AMOLED |
3. 84.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: $1,219.99 List Price: 1319€ | 187 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2640x1080 426 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
4. 83.3%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $8.99 QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $6.99 QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P... List Price: 1299€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
5. 80.2%  | Honor Magic V Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 730 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $24.95 BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ... 2. $16.95 BoxWave Cable Compatible wit... 3. $14.95 BoxWave Stand and Mount Comp... | 193 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2520x1080 403 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
