13.2英寸显示屏搭配骁龙8 Elite Gen 5处理器，性价比极高——OPPO Pad 5 Pro评测

Name: Oppo Pad 5 Pro
Brand: Oppo

价格极具吸引力的旗舰级平板电脑。

13.2英寸的大屏幕、高端性能和超大容量电池：Pad 5 Pro 的价格比 iPad Air 13 更低，但在许多方面表现更胜一筹。除了支持触控笔和 Wi-Fi 7 之外，它还拥有令人惊喜的超长续航时间。在本篇评测中，我们将探讨这款功能强大的高端安卓平板是否值得购买。
Marcus Herbrich (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/20/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

关于OPPO Pad 5 Pro的总结

Pad 5 Pro 令人印象深刻地展示了现代平板电脑的标准究竟被设定得多高。这款 OPPO 平板电脑凭借高品质、纤薄的铝合金一体式机身设计脱颖而出。与此同时，它配备了容量高达 13,380 毫安时的电池，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中几乎让竞争对手望尘莫及。与苹果 iPad Pro 13 相比，Pad 5 Pro 的续航时间超过其两倍。

搭载骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 处理器的 OPPO Pad 也是市场上性能最强的安卓平板之一，其 13.2 英寸 LCD 显示屏亮度惊人，且完全没有 PWM 闪烁现象。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

尽管如此，鉴于荣耀品牌的强劲竞争，很难推荐购买OPPO这款高端平板电脑。这是因为OPPO在XXL平板电脑的关键领域表现欠佳——有时问题较重，有时则较轻。例如，屏幕的对比度略显令人失望，而与iPad机型相比，其扬声器确实是一个明显的竞争劣势。一款高端平板电脑竟未配备指纹识别模块，这一点依然令人费解，这迫使用户不得不依赖安全性较低的2D人脸识别功能。

如果你能接受稍小一点的屏幕和较短的电池续航时间，那么你绝对应该看看我们对MagicPad 4的评测，它作为Pad 5 Pro的替代品非常值得关注。

Pros

+ 无PWM的明亮LCD显示屏

+ 高速SoC

+ 长续航时间

+ 质感上乘

Cons

- 面板对比

- 扬声器声场较浅

- 关于更新时间表的问题

- 欧洲地区暂无货

- 无指纹传感器

OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的价格与上市情况

OPPO Pad 5 Pro目前仅在中国发布。在Trading Shenzhen平台上，配备12 GB运行内存的机型起售价约为700欧元（约合801美元）。制造商尚未就国际版发布发表评论。一款搭载OxygenOS的同款机型即将以“一加Pad 4”之名登陆印度市场。

$24.95
BoxWave Keyboard Compatible with Oppo Pad 5 Pro - SlimKeys Bluetooth Keyboard - with Backlight, Portable Slim LED 7 Colors - Jet Black
$29.95
BoxWave Keyboard Compatible with Oppo Pad 5 Pro - SlimKeys Bluetooth Keyboard, Portable Thin with Chiclet-Style Keys - Jet Black
$9.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protector Transparent Compatible for Oppo Pad 5 Pro 13.2" 289.7x208.8mm

关于OPPO Pad 5 Pro的总结
OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的规格参数
案例——这款高端平板电脑防水吗？
产品特点——一款价格实惠且配备高速USB接口的iPad Pro替代品
软件——关于更新的疑问：Android平板电脑
通信与GNSS——配备WiFi 7和GPS的高端平板电脑
相机——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 配备 1300 万像素摄像头，适用于大学教室
配件与保修——支持触控笔的安卓平板电脑
输入设备与操作——不带指纹传感器的旗舰级平板电脑
显示屏——配备高亮屏幕的安卓平板电脑，但不支持OLED
性能——得益于高通芯片组，OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的运行速度极快
排放量——iPad Pro的替代品，运行时保持凉爽
电池续航——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 拥有超长电池续航
Notebookcheck 综合评分
可能替代方案的比较

OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的规格参数

Oppo Pad 5 Pro (Pad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

12 GB

Display

13.20 inch 3:2, 3000 x 2120 pixel 278 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 219 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, OTG, MIracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 289.7 x 208.8

Battery

13380 mAh

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 4K@30fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo (8 speaker), Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

672 g

Price

700 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例——这款高端平板电脑防水吗？

Pad 5 Pro 凭借迷人的铝合金一体式机身设计和仅约 6 毫米（~0.24 英寸）的厚度令人印象深刻。这使得这款 OPPO 平板电脑尽管配备了巨大的 13,380 毫安时电池，却依然显得非常轻薄。 Pad 5 Pro 虽称不上轻盈，但尺寸相近的 iPad Air 13 的重量也并未轻多少。

得益于相当窄的边框，这款 OPPO 平板电脑拥有近 88% 的出色屏占比。我们未能找到关于 Pad 5 Pro 防护等级（IP 等级）的任何信息，但鉴于 Pad 5 确实具备 IP 等级，Pro 版本的防护性能很可能不逊于“标准”版本。一如既往，中国官网对此未作任何说明。

尺寸对比

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Oppo Pad 5 Pro Oppo Pad 4 Pro Honor MagicPad 4 DIN A4 ❌

产品特点——一款价格实惠且配备高速USB接口的iPad Pro替代品

根据机型不同，Pad 5 Pro 配备 12 GB LPDDR5X 或 16 GB LPDDR5T 内存。为了实现快速数据传输，这款 OPPO 平板电脑支持 USB-C 3.2（第 1 代）接口，包括向外部显示器输出视频。

此外，该设备还支持触控笔、USB OTG 以及蓝牙 5.4。不过，ColorOS 系统目前仍未通过 DisplayPort 接口提供专用的桌面模式，因此用户界面仅以镜像方式显示。

软件——关于更新的疑问：Android平板电脑

Pad 5 Pro 预装基于 Android 16 的 ColorOS 16 系统，支持德语作为系统语言，并可访问 Google Play 商店。制造商尚未透露这款 OPPO 平板电脑将获得系统更新支持的时长。

可持续发展

我们未能找到任何关于OPPO平板电脑所用材料或再生材料占比的信息。与苹果或三星不同，OPPO在透明披露所用材料方面还有很大差距。此外，也很难评估该设备在维修方面的用户友好程度。

不过值得肯定的是，其包装似乎完全不含塑料。只有纸箱本身用塑料薄膜进行了收缩包装。

通信与GNSS——配备WiFi 7和GPS的高端平板电脑

在Wi-Fi网络环境下，这款OPPO平板支持高速Wi-Fi 7，因此可实现当前的最大带宽；不过，使用我们的华硕路由器时，其网速并未完全达到Find X9 Ultra的水平。尽管如此，测得的近1,900 Mbit/s峰值速度对于日常使用来说绰绰有余。

与苹果和三星的高端机型不同，Pad 5 Pro 没有 5G 版本。此外，由于无法通过卫星进行定位，用户必须依赖 Wi-Fi 网络才能实现精准定位。

Networking
Oppo Pad 5 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1642 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1888 (min: 1680) MBit/s ∼82%
Honor MagicPad 4 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	938 (min: 717) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	733 (min: 367) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1863 (min: 1827) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1133 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼57%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1345 (min: 1091) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1993 (min: 1873) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2238 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2315 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	608 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	726 (min: 40.2) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1290 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1505 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1810 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1803 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼78%

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø878 (807-984) MBit/s

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1723 (1322-1804) MBit/s

Oppo Pad 5 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø1642 (1521-1717) MBit/s

Oppo Pad 5 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø1888 (1680-1966) MBit/s

相机——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 配备 1300 万像素摄像头，适用于大学教室

对于大多数用户而言，配备13.2英寸显示屏的平板电脑上的摄像头，其重要性可能不如智能手机上的摄像头。因此，这款低分辨率的800万像素固定焦距前置摄像头，以及其支持全高清视频录制的功能，不应成为影响购买决策的关键因素。

后置摄像头则表现得更为出色，支持30帧/秒的4K录制，并配备1300万像素传感器。在光线充足的条件下，它能拍摄出锐度出众的优质照片，色彩还原效果与当前中端智能手机相当。

经常将课堂笔记或讲座记录数字化的人，也会受益于相机应用中的特殊文档模式。OPPO这款平板电脑非常适合用于此目的。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Motiv 1 Motiv 2 Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修——支持触控笔的安卓平板电脑

该套装包含一个67瓦快充适配器和一条数据/充电线（USB-A转USB-C）。我们的供应商“Trading Shenzhen”还为中国版产品附赠了一个适用于该充电器的欧盟适配器。

作为可选配件，OPPO为其高端平板电脑提供了Pencil 3 Pro以及一款设计上类似于苹果Magic Keyboard的配套QWERTY键盘保护套。

我们进口的设备享有12个月保修。如需保修服务，Trading Shenzhen提供将平板电脑寄送至德国收货地址的选项。

输入设备与操作——不带指纹传感器的旗舰级平板电脑

在采样率高达540 Hz的13.2英寸LCD面板上，手指输入能得到快速而精准的处理——默认情况下，触摸屏每秒会检测240次可能的触控。得益于144 Hz的高刷新率，ColorOS界面上的动画效果显得格外流畅。

上一代机型的Pencil 2 Pro与Pad 5 Pro不兼容，因此手写笔记需要使用最新一代触控笔。OPPO应尽快延长产品生命周期，以免用户在升级平板电脑时不得不频繁购买新的输入外设。

Pad 5 Pro 未配备振动马达。指纹识别模块同样缺失，这一点在 Pad 4 Pro 上我们就已感到难以理解。为何 OPPO 不将指纹传感器集成到电源键中，至今仍是个谜。不过，该机确实提供了一项可靠性较低的 2D 面部识别功能。

显示屏——配备高亮屏幕的安卓平板电脑，但不支持OLED

在我们的测试中，这款采用7:5宽高比的13.2英寸LCD显示屏达到了约900 cd/m²的惊人亮度。这使得它在手动模式下的亮度显著高于前代机型。不过，Pad 5 Pro的亮度仍远不及配备OLED面板的荣耀MagicPad 4。

另一方面，这款OPPO平板电脑的12位面板没有PWM闪烁现象，这对敏感用户尤为有益，并在长时间使用时提供了更护眼的观看体验，这是一大优势。


845 cd/m²	865 cd/m²	865 cd/m²
874 cd/m²	899 cd/m²	842 cd/m²
867 cd/m²	872 cd/m²	852 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 899 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 864.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 899 cd/m²
Contrast: 999:1 (Black: 0.9 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229
CCT: 6693 K

	Oppo Pad 5 Pro LCD, 3000x2120, 13.2"	Honor MagicPad 4 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 IPS, 3504x2109, 13"	Oppo Pad 4 Pro LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"
Display		200%	-18%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	911	2337 157%	751 -18%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	903	3084 242%	738 -18%
Response Times		66%	8%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	27.2 ?(18.4, 8.8)	16.6 ?(0.3615, 16.24) 39%	22.8 ?(18.2, 4.6) 16%	30.6 ?(20.4, 10.2) -13%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	13.4 ?(9.4, 4)	0.91 ?(0.45, 0.4615) 93%	13.6 ?(9.9, 3.7) -1%	15.1 ?(10.4, 4.7) -13%
PWM Frequency (Hz)		60
PWM Amplitude * (%)		16.05
Screen		16%	-1%	-15%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	899	829 -8%	618 -31%	672 -25%
Brightness (cd/m²)	865	827 -4%	599 -31%	652 -25%
Brightness Distribution (%)	94	90 -4%	92 -2%	93 -1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.9		0.5 44%	0.46 49%
Contrast (:1)	999		1236 24%	1461 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.74	0.9 48%	1.59 9%	3.18 -83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.56	1.7 52%	3.79 -6%	4.84 -36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.3 13%	1.7 -13%	2.2 -47%
Gamma	2.229 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.399 ^92%	2.396 ^92%
CCT	6693 ^97%	6601 ^98%	6583 ^99%	7070 ^92%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		94% / 63%	-4% / -2%	-14% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

较不令人满意的是LCD显示屏的对比度相对较低。我们测得的黑色亮度仅为0.9 cd/m²，导致对比度约为1:1,000。另一方面，色彩还原效果非常出色，与参考色之间的差异几乎难以察觉。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.4 ms rise
13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).

性能——得益于高通芯片组，OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的运行速度极快

搭载骁龙8 Elite Gen 5处理器的OPPO Pad 5 Pro是市场上性能最强大的安卓平板电脑之一。这款高通芯片组在其价位段内表现非常出色，尽管iPad Air 13中的苹果M4芯片在性能上仍略胜一筹——至少在CPU和NPU性能方面是如此。

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=21)	3636 Points +4%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3499 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3188 Points -9%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	2863 Points -18%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	2135 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=87, last 2 years)	1706 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9631 - 12383, n=21)	10951 Points +3%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	10672 Points
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	9492 Points -11%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9218 Points -14%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	6855 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=87, last 2 years)	5369 Points -50%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2854581 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2390211 - 3269237, n=6)	2662560 Points
Average of class Tablet (235067 - 3475590, n=53, last 2 years)	1404507 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1698 - 2856, n=17)	2337 Points +12%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	2129 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2087 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1172 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 2375, n=46, last 2 years)	1069 Points -49%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	961 Points -54%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	13287 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=15)	12920 Points -3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	10865 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13287, n=54, last 2 years)	6715 Points -49%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=15)	17029 Points +8%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15763 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	15124 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=54, last 2 years)	9828 Points -38%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=15)	15720 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	14864 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11132 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=54, last 2 years)	7995 Points -46%
Graphics
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	62342 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 62342, n=15)	50221 Points -19%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	42342 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 62342, n=54, last 2 years)	18797 Points -70%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=15)	2187 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2146 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2007 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=54, last 2 years)	1632 Points -24%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24487, n=11)	21159 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	20836 Points
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	20683 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (3564 - 76852, n=51, last 2 years)	18695 Points -10%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	17934 Points -14%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=45, last 2 years)	802 Points +34%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	673 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=20)	642 Points +7%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	598 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	465 Points -22%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=45, last 2 years)	4033 Points +573%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	675 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=20)	629 Points +5%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	599 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	460 Points -23%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=45, last 2 years)	5906 Points +297%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	1578 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1489 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=20)	1453 Points -2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 8192	1022 Points -31%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22476 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=10)	17792 Points -21%
Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12288	17728 Points -21%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	12784 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 22476, n=35, last 2 years)	4404 Points -80%

然而，在图形性能方面情况则有所不同，因为Adreno 840在此方面的表现与苹果的芯片组不相上下。在GFXBench要求极高的4K高阶基准测试中，Pad 5 Pro取得了令人印象深刻的56 FPS。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7173 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6637 Points -7%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points -22%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4153 Points -42%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7198 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6683 Points -7%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points -22%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4170 Points -42%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29287 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25482 Points -13%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	21183 Points -28%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17732 Points -39%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13054 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11992 Points -8%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9627 Points -26%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13086 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11932 Points -9%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9644 Points -26%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2803 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2601 Points -7%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2082 Points -26%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2901 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2517 Points -13%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2093 Points -28%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	797 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -11%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	662 fps -17%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	494 fps +20%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	411 fps
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps -3%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	355 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	331 fps -7%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	298 fps -16%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57 fps -5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	221 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	204 fps -8%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	171 fps -23%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	45 fps -22%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -48%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	134 fps
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98 fps -27%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -57%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50 fps -17%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	304 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	252 fps -17%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps -26%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	143 fps -53%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	56 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps -21%
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps -21%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -54%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	338.038 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=14)	282 Points +9%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro	259.457 Points
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=40, last 2 years)	222 Points -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	90273 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=14)	82791 Points +23%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro	67541 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	57389 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (1633 - 138481, n=70, last 2 years)	50660 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 16233, n=64, last 2 years)	1670 ms * -220%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	666.6 ms * -28%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro	521.7 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=18)	463 ms * +11%
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	371.2 ms * +29%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (67 - 104, n=4)	83.3 Points +24%
Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148)	81 Points +21%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro	67 Points
Average of class Tablet (37 - 102, n=5, last 2 years)	65.4 Points -2%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Pad 5 Pro	Honor MagicPad 4	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2	Oppo Pad 4 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-28%	-42%	-26%	-13%	-50%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4032.65	1978.75 -51%	1912.4 -53%	3801.54 -6%	3486 ?(2057 - 4088, n=9) -14%	2048 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=75, last 2 years) -49%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3687.21	1752.63 -52%	1852.7 -50%	3334.62 -10%	3170 ?(1998 - 3756, n=9) -14%	1640 ?(99.2 - 3773, n=75, last 2 years) -56%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	471.09	513.85 9%	347.8 -26%	297.28 -37%	428 ?(325 - 580, n=9) -9%	273 ?(20.1 - 514, n=75, last 2 years) -42%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	699.38	574.85 -18%	438.3 -37%	335.89 -52%	604 ?(348 - 871, n=9) -14%	319 ?(9.1 - 989, n=75, last 2 years) -54%

排放量——iPad Pro的替代品，运行时保持凉爽

温度

在我们的压力测试场景中，OPPO平板确实会明显发热——最高温度约为45 °C（113 °F）——但触感从未热到令人不适的程度。这是因为Pad 5 Pro的热量积聚非常局部化。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 的帧率出现轻微至中度的下降。不过，性能表现依然相当稳定，降频幅度在 15% 至 25% 之间。

Max. Load

Idle


36.4 °C	45.4 °C	33.5 °C
37 °C	34.7 °C	31.8 °C
32 °C	31.3 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 34.8 °C


33.6 °C	43.8 °C	40.6 °C
32.6 °C	35.2 °C	34.8 °C
31.9 °C	33 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 35.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	96.3 % +16%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 % +10%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.9 % 0%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	82.8 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor MagicPad 4 Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94.8 % +13%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91.1 % +9%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	83.8 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.3 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.1 % +5%
Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	77.2 %

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø36.8 (36-42.9) %

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33.4 (32.9-39.5) %

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø134.7 (130.6-157.7) %

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø121.4 (119-143.7) %

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.4 (31.8-40) %

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø17.9 (16.8-21.8) %

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17 (15.2-18.7) %

发言人

这款八扬声器音响系统在日常使用中能提供不错的立体声效果。不过，中频表现明显比高频更为突出。我们还发现低频缺乏力度。在这个价位段，尤其是同尺寸级别中，有明显更好的选择。

设备配备了一个 USB-C 接口，支持有线音频播放。此外，它还支持蓝牙 5.4 并兼容多种编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、LDAC 和 LHDC）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Pad 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Honor MagicPad 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

电池续航——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 拥有超长电池续航

功耗

OPPO平板电脑的最大充电功率为67瓦，这意味着充满电大约需要90分钟。对于一款XXL尺寸的平板电脑来说，其功耗表现非常出色。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.4 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt
Load	6.7 / 12.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Pad 5 Pro 13380 mAh	Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh	Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-105%	0%	16%	-71%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.4	3.53 -152%	1.5 -7%	0.869 ?(0.52 - 1.4, n=16) 38%	2.21 ?(0.7 - 6.2, n=67, last 2 years) -58%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.7	4.77 -181%	1.8 -6%	1.321 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=16) 22%	4.01 ?(1.2 - 9.06, n=67, last 2 years) -136%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.1	4.86 -131%	2.2 -5%	1.526 ?(0.75 - 2.2, n=16) 27%	4.4 ?(1.56 - 12.5, n=67, last 2 years) -110%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.7	11.21 -67%	5.8 13%	7.71 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=13) -15%	8.92 ?(3.5 - 34.9, n=58, last 2 years) -33%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	12.1	11.67 4%	11.4 6%	11.1 ?(6.97 - 15.3, n=13) 8%	14.4 ?(6.8 - 60.3, n=59, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.9 (1.776-12.1) Watt

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.09 (3.65-11.4) Watt

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.18 (1.34-4.51) Watt

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (11.9-12.1) Watt

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.8-11.4) Watt

Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.18 (1.34-4.51) Watt

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13) Watt

电池续航时间

尽管机身纤薄，Pad 5 Pro 却拥有高达 13,380 mAh 的超大电池容量。当屏幕亮度设置为 150 cd/m² 时，其续航表现堪称一流。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，OPPO 凭借超过 25 小时的续航时间，表现优于竞争对手。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 149)		25h 06min

	Oppo Pad 5 Pro 13380 mAh	Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 10200 mAh	Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	25.1	13.1 -48%	14.2 -43%	18 -28%

Notebookcheck 综合评分

如果你正在寻找一款大屏平板，并且重视续航能力，OPPO Pad 5 Pro 是一款价格实惠的绝佳选择。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Pad 5 Pro - 07/16/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

89 / 98 → 91%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

56 / 69 → 81%

Weight

80 / 40-88 → 84%

Battery

94%

Display

86%

Games Performance

52 / 65 → 80%

Application Performance

91 / 92 → 98%

AI Performance

42%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 91 → 81%

Camera

65 / 90 → 72%

Average

69%

88%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
80%

Power Use
94%

Repairability
34%

Software Updates
73.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 51.1%

可能替代方案的比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.1%	Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $24.95 BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ... 2. $29.95 BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ... 3. $9.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... List Price: 700€	672 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13.20" 3000x2120 278 PPI LCD
2. 89.6%	Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $275.00 HONOR Pad 10 (12.1 inch, Wi-... 2. $289.26 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 8GB ... 3. $695.00 Honor MagicPad3 Wi-Fi Tablet... List Price: 600€	450 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED
3. 86.5%	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 529€	598 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13.00" 3504x2109 315 PPI IPS
4. 87.3%	Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $13.99 Ratesell Smart Case for Oppo... 2. $13.99 Ratesell Smart Case for Oppo... 3. $9.96 Kepuch Tempered Glass Screen... List Price: 587€	675 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI LTPS LCD

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

13.2英寸显示屏搭配骁龙8 Elite Gen 5处理器，性价比极高——OPPO Pad 5 Pro评测

价格极具吸引力的旗舰级平板电脑。

关于OPPO Pad 5 Pro的总结

Pros

Cons

OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的价格与上市情况

Table of Contents

OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的规格参数

案例——这款高端平板电脑防水吗？

尺寸对比

产品特点——一款价格实惠且配备高速USB接口的iPad Pro替代品

软件——关于更新的疑问：Android平板电脑

可持续发展

通信与GNSS——配备WiFi 7和GPS的高端平板电脑

相机——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 配备 1300 万像素摄像头，适用于大学教室

配件与保修——支持触控笔的安卓平板电脑

输入设备与操作——不带指纹传感器的旗舰级平板电脑

显示屏——配备高亮屏幕的安卓平板电脑，但不支持OLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能——得益于高通芯片组，OPPO Pad 5 Pro 的运行速度极快

排放量——iPad Pro的替代品，运行时保持凉爽

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Oppo Pad 5 Pro audio analysis

Honor MagicPad 4 audio analysis

电池续航——OPPO Pad 5 Pro 拥有超长电池续航

功耗

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

可能替代方案的比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles