Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

集工作、娱乐和创意于一身的优质平板电脑--三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 评测

更有成效

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 是一款超薄高端平板电脑，拥有超大显示屏、强大性能和多功能。无论是工作、创意还是娱乐，它都旨在树立新的标准。我们测试了它能否真正达到这些高要求。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Galaxy Tab Tablet Touchscreen

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 的评价

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 是一款高品质的高级平板电脑，配备 14.6 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，拥有超高亮度和令人印象深刻的图像质量。该平板电脑采用铝制一体成型外壳，厚度仅为 5.05 毫米，通过了 IP68 防水防尘认证，具有高品质的外观，但有点太容易扭曲。

这款平板电脑搭载联发科 Dimensity 9400+，配备 12GB 内存和快速 UFS 4.0 存储，可确保超高性能和流畅的多任务处理。 Android 搭载 One UI 8.0 和Galaxy AI 的 16 可在设备上稳定运行，全新的 DeX 模式可直接在平板电脑上使用多个窗口进行高效工作。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

新款 S Pen 的设计经过改进，更适合握在手中，响应也比以前更精确，但它不支持蓝牙，磁性连接也很弱。该平板电脑的 1200 万像素摄像头拍摄效果不错，但并不突出，尤其是在变焦和动态方面。

11,600 毫安时电池可提供不错的续航时间，在 45 瓦的功率下约 90 分钟即可充满电。该设备的优点包括四个扬声器的良好音质，以及 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和 microSD 插槽等现代连接功能。值得批评的是，它缺乏振动功能，显示屏的色彩校准也不够理想。

Pros

+ 纤薄设计
+ 大而明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
+ 高性能
+ 支持长时间更新
+ 附带 S Pen

Cons

- 不带蓝牙的 S Pen
- PWM 频率仍然不够高
- 无 LTPO 显示屏，色彩校准有待改进

价格和供应情况

你可以从亚马逊购买 Wi-Fi 型号的三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra，售价为 1,199.99 美元。

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 将现代设计与超大 AMOLED 显示屏、强大性能和多功能融为一体。无论是日常使用，还是工作和娱乐，它都能给人留下深刻印象--这是一款旨在满足高标准的高端平板电脑，其价格也与之相匹配。

三星平板电脑有三种存储容量可供选择：

Wi-Fi 5G
256 GB 1,199.99 美元 约 1,700 美元
512 GB 1,319.99 美元 约 1,800 美元
1,024 GB 1,619.99 美元 约 2,200 美元

规格：三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
14.60 inch 16:10, 2960 x 1848 pixel 239 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, anti-reflection coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 223.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.1 x 326.3 x 208.5
Battery
11600 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery cycles: 1200
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (25 mm, f/2.0, AF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, 10 mm, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (15 / 25 mm, f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, S Pen, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 330,04 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS read only, FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 0.797 W/kg | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired), fanless, waterproof
Weight
695 g
Price
1489 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 - 为 Tab S11 Ultra 设计的具有 IP 认证的铝制一体成型机身

前身模型 前代机型在三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 中，原本就纤薄的机身变得更薄，现在的规格厚度仅为 5.1 毫米，而我们实际测量的厚度仅为 5.05 毫米。两个摄像头各突出 2.15 毫米，但该设备平放在桌面上时几乎不会晃动。

该平板电脑采用一体式机身设计，只有天线的凹槽将其打断。买家可以选择灰色和银色。尽管设计纤薄，但该设备的铠甲铝似乎非常坚固，但扭动时会发出吱吱嘎嘎的响声。Tab S11 Ultra 的表面处理令人印象深刻--缝隙紧密均匀，尽管边缘坚硬，但手感很好。

Galaxy 这款平板电脑再次通过了 IP68 认证，具有防水和防尘功能。在我们的灰色机型上，卡槽的颜色与边框的其他部分不同。卡槽可容纳 nano-SIM 卡和 microSD 卡。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 旁边是Galaxy Z Fold7（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 旁边的 Tab S11（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 旁边的 Tab S11（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 旁边的 Tab S11（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
325 mm 214 mm 8.6 mm 960 g326.3 mm 208.5 mm 5.1 mm 695 g289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g289.1 mm 196.1 mm 5.5 mm 580 g281.6 mm 215.5 mm 5.1 mm 579 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 标配全新 S Pen

与 Tab S10 Ultra 相比，它的功能变化不大 Tab S10 Ultra包括一个快速 USB 3.2 端口（第 1 代），在我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 进行的复制测试中，其传输速率高达约 330 MB/s 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7.连接的存储设备必须使用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化；NTFS 只能读取，不能写入。

S Pen 也重新加入了平板电脑，但其磁性连接面现在位于平板电脑的顶部边缘，而不是背面。由于磁力吸附面非常窄，因此握持感不强，笔很容易从口袋和背包中掉落。背面的金属触点可用于连接选配的键盘盖。

此外，还提供蓝牙 5.4、Wi-Fi 7 和 microSD 支持。

左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器
左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器
顶部：音量、电源、麦克风、SIM 卡/MicroSD
顶部：音量、电源、麦克风、SIM 卡/MicroSD
底部
底部
右侧扬声器、USB、扬声器
右侧扬声器、USB、扬声器

microSD 读卡器

Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 的 microSD 卡插槽与我们的参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 配合使用，在我们的复制测试中实现了不错的传输速率，但速度不如上一代产品。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
47.3 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.33 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 58.4, n=62, last 2 years)
36.5 MB/s -9%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø13.9 (5.94-34.9)
Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.1 (24.1-50.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø59.6 (37.5-72.3)
Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.7 (17.8-83.5)

软件 -Android 16 和改进的 DeX 模式

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 预装了谷歌Android 16 和内部用户界面 One UI 8.0。它将在七年内接受更新（直至 2032 年 9 月 30 日）。用户还可以完全访问Galaxy AI 和 AI 代理。

三星对 DeX 模式进行了重大改造。它仍然可以通过线缆或无线方式投射到外部显示器上，但现在也可以直接在平板电脑上充分使用。在传统平板电脑模式和 DeX 模式之间切换，只需一个简单的轻扫手势，就能调整窗口和应用程序的大小和位置。此外，它还支持多达四个桌面。

可持续性

这款平板电脑采用超薄无塑料包装。在测试时，还没有详细的可持续发展报告，但该平板电脑使用的铝材是 100% 由可回收资源制成的。不过，这只占设备的 11.53%，可回收利用率为 8.9%。

三星公司已经列出了备件和维修手册，但目前还没有库存，未来几周内应该会有变化。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 配备高速 Wi-Fi 7

5G 版本的三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 支持令人印象深刻的频段范围，在我们的测试中始终表现出稳定的接收效果。Wi-Fi 连接采用了最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用，传输速率高且稳定。

它的大显示屏、四个扬声器和良好的三麦克风设置都有助于创造强大的视频通话和会议体验。在安静的环境中，它的音效也不错，前置摄像头能很好地跟踪画面中的人物。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
971 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1873 (min: 1645) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1018 (min: 1003) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼56%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼52%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T70
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
92.7 (min: 57) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
120 (min: 100) MBit/s ∼7%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1110 (min: 755) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1254 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1497 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
548 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
610 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1240 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1478 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼79%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1812 (908-1912)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1196 (901-1327)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1868 (1645-1911)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (615-1142)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (476-998)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (447-820)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (963-989)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø606 (509-661)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

它的定位服务只使用单频全球导航卫星系统，这意味着在室内定位和稳定用户位置需要更长的时间。而在室外则要快得多，但即便如此，它的定位功能在使用GPS 测试时仍然相当不准确。

我们还将三星平板电脑与 Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表进行了比较。它准确地追踪了我们的路线，而且只是稍微偏离了我们所走的路线。值得注意的是，这可能主要适用于我们测试的 5G 版本，因为 Wi-Fi 版本的小尺寸 Tab S11的定位能力明显较差。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖路线
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖路线
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

摄像头 - 前面只有一个镜头

自拍（25 毫米）
自拍（25 毫米）
自拍（15 毫米）
自拍（15 毫米）

平板电脑的正面现在只有一个 1200 万像素的摄像头，这是一个超广角镜头。广角是通过裁剪部分实现的，因此与前代产品相比，其功能并没有受到限制。这对视频通话没有明显的影响，我们在测试中也注意到了良好的画面效果。

背面的主摄像头色彩还原相当自然，但动态范围较低。不过，它在日光下也能拍出不错的照片。变焦时，平板电脑很快就会达到极限；放大两倍以上会导致质量明显下降。其超广角拍摄效果不错，但景深较低，边缘畸变严重。

视频最多只能以高清、全高清或超高清格式录制。所有分辨率都只有 30 FPS，这适用于所有相机。无法使用背面的超广角镜头进行视频录制。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

在可控的照明条件下，平板电脑准确地捕捉到了我们的测试图，但即使在图像的中心，细节也没有得到很好的保留，显得有些模糊。

在 ColorChecker 图表中，色彩没有出现大的偏差，但与我们的测试照片一样，红色调显得很弱。

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: 7.54 ∆E min: 4.28 - max: 12.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
51 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
42 ∆E
59.5 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
67 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: 43.65 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 70.32 ∆E

配件和保修 - 仍包括 S Pen

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 附带有限的配件，包括 USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具和 S Pen。三星商店提供的可选配件包括书套、键盘套、防眩光屏幕保护膜和替换 S Pen。

三星 Care+ 保险套餐也适用于这款平板电脑。仅意外保护的一次性费用约为 40 美元，或每月不到 10 美元。如果希望加入防盗保护，则必须支付约 260 美元或每月约 13 美元的费用。在美国，该设备享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 不带蓝牙的全新 S Pen

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 的电容式触摸屏触感舒适、平滑，同时能在所有区域可靠、快速地执行输入。S Pen（一种有源手写笔）也包含在该平板电脑的供货范围内，但现在缺少蓝牙功能。现在，这支笔采用六角形设计，握在手中非常舒适。此外，笔尖也经过了重新设计，现在能更好地处理更平的倾斜角度。因此，它带来了更多的可能性，尤其是在绘画时。它的快速功能也得到了优化，现在只需轻触按钮就能直接访问最重要的选项。总之，我们非常喜欢新的 S Pen，它是设备的理想补充，有助于营造自然的书写感觉。

在生物识别安全方面，显示屏集成了光学指纹传感器。它位于Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 较短的右侧，横向使用时最容易接触到。不过，如果直立使用平板电脑，就必须调整握持方式。此外，用户还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，这虽然不那么安全，但在光线充足的条件下却非常可靠。

与 前代产品Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 不再配备振动马达。

显示屏 - 三星将 PWM 频率提高了一倍

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

这款平板电脑的 14.6 英寸（37.084 厘米）AMOLED 显示屏非常大，能提供出色的用户体验。它支持最常见的 HDR 标准，但不支持 Dolby Vision。与高端智能手机不同的是，该系统可以动态调节刷新率，但只能在 30 到 120 Hz 之间调节。

三星宣称亮度可达 1,000 尼特或 1,600 尼特峰值亮度。在屏幕上显示纯白图像时，我们测得的平均亮度为 965 cd/m²，而在显示较小的白色区域时，亮度最高可达 1,575 cd/m²，在播放 HDR 视频时甚至达到 1,739 cd/m²。

我们还测量到其 OLED 闪烁有所改善，在所有亮度范围内，闪烁频率都增加到了 480 Hz，使显示屏更容易看清。不过，尽管振幅已经趋于平缓，但频率仍然不够高，不能完全排除特别敏感的人感到不适的可能性。

1017
cd/m²		1016
cd/m²		1017
cd/m²
977
cd/m²		966
cd/m²		958
cd/m²
913
cd/m²		921
cd/m²		899
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1017 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 964.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 966 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
CCT: 6305 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Flexible OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Teclast T70
IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
Screen
14%
25%
-13%
-69%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
966
795
-18%
1000
4%
672
-30%
400
-59%
Brightness (cd/m²)
965
791
-18%
1010
5%
652
-32%
385
-60%
Brightness Distribution (%)
88
97
10%
98
11%
93
6%
92
5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.46
0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.8
1.1
61%
1
64%
3.18
-14%
5.15
-84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.6
2.5
46%
2.5
46%
4.84
-5%
10.41
-126%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.1
-0%
1.7
19%
2.2
-5%
4
-90%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.396 92%
2.131 103%
CCT
6305 103%
6822 95%
6661 98%
7070 92%
7235 90%
Contrast (:1)
1461
1111

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1575 cd/m²
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
809 cd/m² -49%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1739 cd/m²
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
831 cd/m² -52%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz
Amplitude: 16.95 %

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们选择了 "自然 "配置文件对平板电脑的显示屏进行卡尔曼分析，因为它能最准确地呈现色彩。总体而言，Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 在这方面表现良好，但饱和度略高，尤其是在显示绿色色调时。这导致绿色色调出现明显偏差，红色也受到影响。对于一款高档平板电脑来说，其校准效果可能会更好，尤其是因为它的广告宣传是用于创意工作等。

灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3655 ms rise
↘ 0.364 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.619 ms rise
↘ 1.889 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

在户外，Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 在阳光下的可读性要比 S10 Ultra 好得多，这主要是因为新机型的面板亮度更高。不过，它的防反射涂层也带来了明显的不同，尽管其效果远不如 MatePad Pro 13.2 的 PaperMatte 显示屏。 MatePad Pro 13.2.

三星平板电脑的视角稳定性很好；在平视角度下，它的颜色会略微变暗，但不会失真。对着光线看时，可以看到彩虹色的光泽，但这并不影响日常使用。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 -Galaxy Tab S11 系列配备 Dimensity 9400+

今年，三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 再次采用了联发科的 SoC，即 Dimensity 9400+它可以使用 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。

该芯片组性能卓越，仅略低于 骁龙 8 精英版在我们的测试中，只有 M4来自 iPad Pro在我们的对比中完全处于不同的水平。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
3715 Points +33%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3188 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2798 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2478 - 2798, n=3)
2670 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1574 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=100, last 2 years)
1367 Points -51%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
715 Points -74%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
14690 Points +62%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9218 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9043 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (7787 - 9043, n=3)
8395 Points -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
5159 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=100, last 2 years)
4357 Points -52%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1811 Points -80%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2854581 Points +14%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
2716980 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2396591 - 2841845, n=3)
2583409 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2511791 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1087402 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=71, last 2 years)
1069210 Points -57%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
401253 Points -84%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (17301 - 18344, n=2)
17823 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
17301 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
15804 Points -9%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14862 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=87, last 2 years)
11887 Points -31%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10265 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (12211 - 12637, n=3)
12402 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12358 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10865 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8050 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=67, last 2 years)
5531 Points -55%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3002 Points -76%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
16550 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (13894 - 16550, n=3)
15572 Points -6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15124 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12284 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=67, last 2 years)
8812 Points -47%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6023 Points -64%
Memory
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (11533 - 13578, n=3)
12765 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
11533 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11132 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8600 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=67, last 2 years)
6527 Points -43%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3462 Points -70%
Graphics
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (54322 - 55053, n=3)
54683 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
54675 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42342 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
20520 Points -62%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
14218 Points -74%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2901 Points -95%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2225 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2152 - 2267, n=3)
2215 Points 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2007 Points -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1937 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=67, last 2 years)
1470 Points -34%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1300 Points -42%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (72895 - 76843, n=3)
74292 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
73138 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17934 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76843, n=68, last 2 years)
14973 Points -80%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12773 Points -83%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
7451 Points -90%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1143 - 1233, n=3)
1180 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1164 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 1483, n=20, last 2 years)
532 Points -54%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9597 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (8659 - 9597, n=3)
9108 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 9666, n=20, last 2 years)
2140 Points -78%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
13099 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (11834 - 13099, n=3)
12452 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 13178, n=20, last 2 years)
3124 Points -76%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=10, last 2 years)
1384 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
97.8 Points
Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12784 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12713 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1945 - 12713, n=3)
9097 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=23, last 2 years)
3637 Points -71%
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
70.4 Points -99%

集成 ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12图形处理器支持基于硬件的光线追踪，性能卓越。它与 Adreno 830不相上下，在某些基准测试中甚至更快。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8889 Points +35%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6601 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1757 Points -73%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
355 Points -95%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8689 Points +32%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6589 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1796 Points -73%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points -95%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
32525 Points +37%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23699 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7178 Points -70%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points -95%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
14922 Points +27%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11992 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11737 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
15576 Points +32%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11932 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11788 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3737 Points +55%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2601 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2415 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
549 Points -77%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3583 Points +44%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2517 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2496 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
545 Points -78%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points -95%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
853 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
758.2 fps -11%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
371 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
530 fps +44%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
494 fps +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
208 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
106.2 fps -10%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
399.5 fps +29%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
142 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
84.1 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps -41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
283.9 fps +66%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
204 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
60 fps -22%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps -42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -70%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -92%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
114.5 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -68%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -94%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
99.8 fps -8%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -66%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.3 fps -90%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
339.7 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
316 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -70%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -95%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
55.1 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -72%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps -95%

Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 上网速度很快，在我们的基准测试中表现出色。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
333.7 Points +23%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1)
272 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)
271.946 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
200.378 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
180.698 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=68, last 2 years)
139.5 Points -49%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
32 runs/min +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)
25.8 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (9.67 - 25.8, n=2)
17.7 runs/min -31%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
16.5 runs/min -36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
16.4 runs/min -36%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=57, last 2 years)
14 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
315 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)
235 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (112 - 235, n=3)
193.7 Points -18%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
173 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
129.6 Points -45%
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
81 Points -66%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
105178 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)
94555 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (36745 - 94555, n=3)
73558 Points -22%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
56134 Points -41%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years)
39205 Points -59%
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
22689 Points -76%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2687 ms * -587%
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
2156 ms * -451%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms * -70%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
625.7 ms * -60%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 612, n=3)
465 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra (Chrome 140)
391 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
318.8 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

三星为其顶级平板电脑配备了快速的 UFS 4.0 存储设备，在我们的测试中传输速率很高。只有在写入小数据块时，它才被证明有点慢。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 UltraHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Oppo Pad 4 ProTeclast T70Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
211%
145%
19%
253%
173%
61%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4076.86
1864.54
-54%
3801.54
-7%
975.4
-76%
3912.45
-4%
3656 ?(1493 - 4384, n=48)
-10%
1551 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2257.93
1441.8
-36%
3334.62
48%
505.3
-78%
2963.58
31%
2709 ?(555 - 3484, n=48)
20%
1141 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
384.4
305.89
-20%
297.28
-23%
165.1
-57%
342.97
-11%
379 ?(218 - 483, n=48)
-1%
227 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
50.66
533.47
953%
335.89
563%
195.5
286%
554.76
995%
397 ?(50.7 - 730, n=48)
684%
252 ?(9.1 - 745, n=89, last 2 years)
397%

游戏--前所未有的可见度

如果你想在游戏时获得最大的可视性，那么 Tab S11 Ultra 可能是你的最佳伴侣。它不仅拥有超大显示屏，还配备了出色的扬声器和强大的 GPU。我们使用GameBench 对后者进行了测试。.

这款平板电脑在《PUGB》和《源氏冲击》中的表现完美无瑕，即使在最高细节设置下也能流畅运行。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.9 (47-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.0.0_36598533_36939763: Ø59.9 (54-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 4.0.0: Ø86.8 (63-91)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (49-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 4.0.0: Ø39.9 (32-41)

排放 -Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 的强大音效

温度

在我们的测试过程中，三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 的表面温度始终保持安全，即使在连续负载的情况下，也只是偶尔上升到 40 °C 以上。

平板电脑在压力测试中出现了节流现象，但我们在日常使用中没有发现任何限制。

Max. Load
 39.8 °C46 °C32.6 °C 
 32.4 °C32.7 °C28.7 °C 
 30.7 °C30.6 °C28.1 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
33.1 °C41.8 °C43.4 °C
30.1 °C33.3 °C35.2 °C
29.5 °C30.2 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
100 % +23%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +23%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % +21%
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.5 %
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
66.5 % -19%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.9 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.7 % -1%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
71.3 % -12%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.4 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Teclast T70
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.3 % +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.2 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87.1 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.1 % -7%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
67.8 % -22%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø32 (30.9-37.5)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø37.5 (34.3-51.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø103.9 (99.2-122.5)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (60-60)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø144.6 (128.1-193.8)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø40.7 (39.2-53.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø33 (31.8-39.3)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø38.8 (36.3-50.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16.2 (15.8-18.1)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.8)

发言人

尽管这款平板电脑设计纤薄，但Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 上的四个扬声器却能提供良好的音质--虽然高频的清晰度稍有欠缺。另一方面，低频的表现令人惊讶。

此外，还可以通过 USB 或蓝牙输出声音，不过后者只支持有限的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.932.92524.325.93120.719.74018.126.85030.837.96321.7318014.845.310017.250.912514.358.716017.168.320014.369.625014.271.131514.571.74001369.350011.870.263013.275.480010.977.3100011.775.9125011.475.4160011.777200012.370.725001374.1315012.873400012.477.1500013.973.3630013.573.980001375.11000013.6681250013.762.7160001358.8SPL24.886.6N0.676.7median 13median 73Delta1.24.133.244.431.841.218.23623.433.332.437.119.429.618.839.817.653.913.862.715.967.5166516.466.615.169.913.871.312.977.113.878.513.576.713.17613.874.312.576.41372.713.271.414.567.713.464.71465.915.270.91569.513.664.41760.115.555.42685.30.767.1median 13.8median 69.514.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S11 UltraApple iPad Pro 13 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 11,600 毫安时，尽管机身纤薄

耗电量

仅由于显示屏较大，该设备的耗电量就高于竞争对手，而且在最大亮度下，耗电量也高得不成比例。

它的大容量电池最大充电功率为 45 瓦。在我们的测试中，充满电需要 94 分钟（50%：36 分钟，80%：60 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.67 / 6.31 / 6.35 Watt
Load midlight 12.23 / 15.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
11600 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Teclast T70
10000 mAh		Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
19%
18%
52%
34%
14%
29%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
2.67
3.74
-40%
1.94
27%
1.5
44%
2.9
-9%
2.56 ?(1.08 - 3.9, n=4)
4%
1.98 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=82, last 2 years)
26%
Idle Average * (Watt)
6.31
4.24
33%
5.02
20%
1.8
71%
3.1
51%
4.77 ?(4.13 - 6.31, n=4)
24%
3.8 ?(1 - 9.2, n=82, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
6.35
4.34
32%
5.05
20%
2.2
65%
3.5
45%
4.94 ?(4.15 - 6.35, n=4)
22%
4.14 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=82, last 2 years)
35%
Load Average * (Watt)
12.23
6.94
43%
8.71
29%
5.8
53%
6.4
48%
11.2 ?(9.4 - 12.5, n=4)
8%
9.09 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years)
26%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
15.8
11.8
25%
16.93
-7%
11.4
28%
10.4
34%
13.6 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=4)
14%
12.8 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=77, last 2 years)
19%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.76 (3.15-15.8)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.82 (2.9-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.88-4.23)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.7 (9.7-15.5)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.8 (15.8-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.88-4.23)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79)

运行时间

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 的运行时间不错，但并不突出。在我们的测试中，一些竞争对手的续航时间甚至更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 35min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)
13h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 31min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
11600 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Teclast T70
10000 mAh
Battery runtime
-30%
29%
54%
15%
Reader / Idle (h)
21.6
30.2
40%
43.2
100%
H.264 (h)
15.5
19.6
26%
21.5
39%
17.1
10%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
13.2
9.2
-30%
12.5
-5%
18
36%
15.7
19%
Load (h)
3.5
5.4
54%
4.9
40%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 的强大显示屏、高性能和改进的 DeX 模式给人留下了深刻印象。新的 S Pen 书写精准，但其磁性连接不是最强的。平板电脑的摄像头和振动电机的缺失也是它的弱点。总而言之，这是一款缺点不多的顶级平板电脑。

三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra - 10/02/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 97%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Battery
89%
Display
89%
Games Performance
52 / 65 → 80%
Application Performance
80 / 92 → 87%
AI Performance
77%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
91 / 91 → 99%
Camera
66 / 90 → 73%
Average
82%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
79.1%
Materials
65%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
91.8%
Repairability
68%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 83.2%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $1,199.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra...
2. $859.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...
3. $13.59
AACL 2 Pack Tempered Glass f...
List Price: 1489€		695 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash14.60"
2960x1848
239 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2.
85.4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92 ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $18.99
Compatible with Huawei MateP...
2. $35.99
nincyee Tablet Silicone Case...
3. $27.99
BLCshine 2Pcs Magnetic Paper...
List Price: 1199€		580 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.20"
2880x1920
262 PPI
Flexible OLED
3.
89.2%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB		Amazon: $1,099.00
List Price: 2279€		579 g1 TB NAND Flash13.00"
2752x2064
265 PPI
Tandem OLED
4.
87.3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.90
YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Prote...
2. $13.01
A-BEAUTY Rotating Case Compa...
3. 
CHSTLS 2Pcs Paper-Feel Magne...
List Price: 587€		675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"
3392x2400
315 PPI
LTPS LCD
5.
72.8%
Teclast T70
Teclast T70
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $17.89
Screen Protector for TECLAST...
2. $19.50
NOUKAJU Screen Protector for...
3. $21.99
14.1-inch Android Tablet Cas...
List Price: 270€		960 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash14.00"
1920x1200
162 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 集工作、娱乐和创意于一身的优质平板电脑--三星Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-10- 9 (Update: 2025-10- 9)