OPPO Pad 6 评测
OPPO Pad 6 具备成为一款真正出色平板电脑的所有要素：超长续航、高品质机身、亮度高的屏幕、强劲的性能以及不错的扬声器，使其在多种场合下都能成为得力的伙伴。
不过，也有一些问题不容忽视：存在一个奇怪的网络故障，该问题在 Oppo Pad 5 上就已经存在，导致无法达到快速的 Wi-Fi 7 网速——至少在我们的测试环境中是这样。可选的 5G 版本已停产，且不支持卫星定位。
此外，您还必须接受这样一个事实：OPPO（目前）尚未就系统更新做出任何具体承诺。
Pad 6 是否会在西方国家正式发布，以及国际版是否会像 Oppo Pad 5 那样出现显著的配置降级，目前尚不得而知。
作为中国进口产品，这款设备的售价与西方市场同类平板电脑相比也几乎没有便宜多少。但如果你愿意费点周折，就能得到一款运行流畅、外观吸引人且经久耐用的平板电脑。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
OPPO Pad 6 目前仅作为中国进口商品发售。
在我们的合作伙伴 TradingShenzhen 处，其售价为 685 美元。除了相对较低的运费外，无需支付关税或增值税等额外费用。
- $18.99INSOLKIDON Compatible for Oppo Pad 6 (12.1 inch, 2026 Model) Tablet Case, Full Coverage Ultra Slim Adjustable Stand Silicone Shockproof Lightweight Protective Cover Case (Black)
- $18.99Case for Oppo Pad 6 Tablet 12.1 Inch 2026, Soft Silicone Kids Friendly Full Body Protective Cover for Oppo Pad 6 Tablet Model (OPD2601) 12.1 Inch with Adjustable Stand, Drop-Proof (Black)
- $18.89for Oppo Pad SE 2025 Android 11 Inch Tablet Case,BOVUGAC Tri-fold Tablet Case Cover for Oppo Pad SE 11",Full Protection, Premium PU, Scratch Resistant.(Red)
规格
案例与亮点——配备出色机身的中国平板电脑
OPPO Pad 6 采用相当简洁的金属机身，右上角配有药丸状的摄像头模组。正面配备窄边框显示屏，赋予这款平板电脑现代感的外观。尽管如此，您仍可稳稳地握住平板电脑，而不会意外触碰到触摸屏。
OPPO Pad 6 重 577 克，厚度不足 6 毫米，与同价位平板电脑相当。我们的测试机型表现出了极高的坚固性和耐用性，尽管它没有 IP 防护等级。
该机型提供银色、深灰色和浅蓝色三种配色。
得益于 USB 3.1 接口，还可通过 DisplayPort 协议使用数据线将视频信号输出至外部显示器。作为一项特殊功能，该平板电脑可通过网络共享功能同时连接两个热点，从而同时利用两部智能手机的 5G 网络连接来访问互联网。
通信与操作——WiFi 7 仅存在于纸面上
OPPO Pad 6 实际上支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准，但在我们使用华硕 RT-BE96U 进行的测试环境中，它无法通过该最新标准建立连接。我们在 OPPO Pad 5 上也遇到了同样的问题。其达到的传输速度同样较低，且在整个测试过程中波动较大。 其他智能手机和平板电脑在此处的传输速度则明显更高。
使用 FritzBox 6690 Cable 进行的第二次测试，同样未能实现更快或更稳定的数据传输。
触控屏刷新率最高可达 144 Hz，对输入的响应非常可靠且精准。 该平板电脑背面设有3个弹簧针接口，可用于连接键盘保护套等设备。此外还支持触控笔。
虽然没有指纹传感器，但配备了2D面部识别功能。
| Networking | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
软件与可持续发展——多语言平板电脑
该设备预装了基于 Android 16 的 ColorOS 16 系统，支持多种语言。
OPPO 未明确说明该平板电脑将获得系统更新多长时间。 一般迹象表明，平板电脑将至少获得三年的安全补丁更新，但具体时长目前用户只能猜测和期待。
包装未使用塑料薄膜；除此之外，关于该产品的可持续性方面没有更多信息。
相机——随身必备品
前后均配备了800万像素摄像头。这些摄像头可用于拍摄快照和扫描文档。不过，其成像质量对于专业摄影师而言尚显不足。
前置摄像头能拍摄出不错的自拍照，也可用于视频会议，但外接网络摄像头的成像质量有时会明显更好。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow Light
显示器——无PWM的大屏幕
这款采用LCD技术的12.1英寸屏幕，其像素数量比OPPO Pad 5略高。此外，我们的测试机型采用了哑光表面处理。
屏幕在全屏显示白色时，亮度可达821 cd/m²，对于这个价位来说，这是一个不错的水平。
由于并非OLED屏幕，我们在低亮度下未检测到任何PWM闪烁现象。这对对此敏感的用户来说是个好消息。
色彩还原非常准确，肉眼难以分辨与理想状态的差异。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 821 cd/m²
Contrast: 1747:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.49 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.293
CCT: 6391 K
| Oppo Pad 6 LCD, 3000x2000, 12.1" | Oppo Pad 5 LCD, 2800x1980, 12.1" | Honor MagicPad 4 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | Xiaomi Pad 8 IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 196% | -29% | ||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 899 | 903 0% | 2337 160% | 644 -28% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 929 | 926 0% | 3084 232% | 652 -30% | |
| Response Times | -18% | 49% | -77% | -22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 17.2 ? | 25.1 ? -46% | 16.6 ? 3% | 33.6 ? -95% | 18.8 ? -9% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 14.6 ? | 13.1 ? 10% | 0.91 ? 94% | 23.2 ? -59% | 19.5 ? -34% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16.05 | ||||
| Screen | -19% | 34% | 14% | -0% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 821 | 892 9% | 829 1% | 627 -24% | 625 -24% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.47 | 0.8 -70% | 0.3 36% | 0.4 15% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1747 | 1115 -36% | 2090 20% | 1563 -11% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.49 | 1.17 21% | 0.9 40% | 1.25 16% | 1.49 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.24 | 4.67 -44% | 1.7 48% | 2.95 9% | 3.18 2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.3 8% | 1.3 48% | 1.8 28% | 2.1 16% |
| Gamma | 2.293 96% | 2.415 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.183 101% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6391 102% | 6856 95% | 6601 98% | 6898 94% | 6940 94% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 862 | 827 | 613 | 613 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 90 | 96 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-15% | 93% /
78% | -32% /
-9% | -17% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7665 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——终于，更强劲的动力
凭借联发科天玑9500s芯片，OPPO Pad 6的性能较前代有了显著提升，现已与同价位平板电脑处于同一水平。在日常使用中，菜单导航极其流畅，即使是更耗资源的应用程序也能毫无问题地运行。
在存储方面，OPPO采用了UFS 3.1，确保了良好的读写速度。不过，其性能仍略逊于顶级平板电脑。
机身发热程度适中。但在3DMark压力测试中，我们发现长时间使用后有时会出现明显的降频现象。
机身上的六个扬声器音质不错，不过低音仍稍显薄弱。您可以通过USB接口或蓝牙连接外部音频设备，并支持无线连接中最常见的编解码器。
电池容量与上一代机型保持不变。但这其实没有必要——毕竟，10,420 mAh 的容量在其他平板电脑中本就处于平均水平以上。电池续航表现同样出色，在沙发上使用轻松能撑过一整天。此次充电速度显著提升，最高可达 67 瓦。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (59 - 120, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (5.2 - 301, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (182 - 277, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (5.6 - 323, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (46 - 103, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (75 - 91, n=2) | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (2 - 134, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (34 - 49, n=2) | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.81 - 57, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | Oppo Pad 5 | Honor MagicPad 4 | Xiaomi Pad 8 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 59% | 189% | 149% | 74% | 90% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1742.8 | 1922.71 10% | 1978.75 14% | 3899.2 124% | 1770 ? 2% | 2120 ? 22% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1676.9 | 1674.97 0% | 1752.63 5% | 3391.2 102% | 1236 ? -26% | 1719 ? 3% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 308.5 | 208.83 -32% | 513.85 67% | 325.1 5% | 289 ? -6% | 280 ? -9% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 74.7 | 266.49 257% | 574.85 670% | 348.2 366% | 319 ? 327% | 332 ? 344% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 8 | |
| Oppo Pad 6 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
Oppo Pad 6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (129.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Honor MagicPad 4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.6 / 1.8 / 1.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Oppo Pad 6 10420 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 10420 mAh | Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 9200 mAh | Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 9705 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -147% | -4% | 14% | -98% | ||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 3.53 -121% | 1.3 19% | 1.395 ? 13% | 2.21 ? -38% | |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.8 | 1.9 -6% | 4.77 -165% | 2 -11% | 1.515 ? 16% | 4.01 ? -123% | |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.9 | 2.1 -11% | 4.86 -156% | 2.3 -21% | 1.665 ? 12% | 4.4 ? -132% | |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.7 | 11.21 | 6.6 | 6.8 ? | 8.97 ? | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 9 | 11.67 | 13.3 | 11.5 ? | 14.5 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Oppo Pad 6 10420 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 10420 mAh | Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 8 9200 mAh | Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 9705 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -1% | -32% | 7% | -31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 19.3 | 19.1 -1% | 13.1 -32% | 20.7 7% | 13.4 -31% |
| Load (h) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 5.1 | ||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 46.7 | 25.7 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
OPPO Pad 6 相比前代产品有了明显的改进，终于能在同价位平板电脑中独当一面。
不过，遗憾的是，5G版本已不再提供。
Oppo Pad 6
- 09/07/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.8%  | Oppo Pad 6 Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: 1. $18.99 INSOLKIDON Compatible for Op... 2. $18.99 Case for Oppo Pad 6 Tablet 1... 3. $18.89 for Oppo Pad SE 2025 Android... List Price: 667€ | 579 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 3000x2000 298 PPI LCD |
2. 80.9%  | Oppo Pad 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 459€ | 577 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 2800x1980 283 PPI LCD |
3. 89.6%  | Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $899.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... 2. $853.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... 3. $1,020.00 HONOR MagicPad4 (12.3 Inch, ... List Price: 600€ | 450 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED |
4. 87.1%  | Xiaomi Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $382.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $406.13 XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version... 3. $379.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version... List Price: 437€ | 485 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS |
5. 87.1%  | Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 Apple M4 8-Core ⎘ Apple M4 9-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: List Price: 849€ | 616 g | 128 GB NVMe | 12.90" 2732x2048 265 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
