对OPPO Pad Mini的评测结论
OPPO Pad Mini 提供了当前市场上无与伦比的平板电脑体验。在平板电脑最关键的三个方面——显示屏、电池和设计——OPPO Pad 远超竞争对手。直接对比之下，即使是Apple 的iPad Mini，其宽大的边框也使其看起来像是一款入门级设备。
目前，平板电脑爱好者若想找到一款采用超轻金属一体式机身、屏幕边框极窄，同时配备高亮度OLED屏幕和超长续航时间的设备，唯有OPPO Pad Mini。 虽然联想的产品线中确实有一款性能稍强的迷你平板——Legion Tab Gen 5——但OPPO Pad搭载的骁龙8 Gen 5处理器已能为日常使用提供绰绰有余的性能，并确保始终流畅的用户体验。
缺乏具备定位追踪功能的蜂窝调制解调器，以及未配备指纹传感器和在欧洲地区供应有限等因素，在一定程度上削弱了这款本应出色的OPPO Pad Mini的整体印象。
Pros
Cons
OPPO Pad Mini 的价格和上市情况
在中国，配备 12 GB LPDDR5X 内存的 OPPO Pad Mini 售价为 4,499 人民币，约合 580 欧元（约合 650 美元）。 在我们的租赁合作伙伴Trading Shenzhen处，这款紧凑型平板电脑的起售价为640欧元。哑光Soft Light版本售价约为720欧元。该产品似乎不太可能在欧洲上市。
- $432.50XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 9200mAh Four Speakers 13 Mp Model 25097RP43G (Gray, 256GB + 8GB)
- $303.99OnePlus Pad Go 2 128GB 8GB Shadow Black WiFi
- $449.00Apple iPad mini (A17 Pro): Apple Intelligence, 8.3-inch Liquid Retina Display, 128GB, Wi-Fi 6E, 12MP Front/12MP Back Camera, Touch ID, All-Day Battery Life — Space Gray
OPPO Pad Mini 规格参数
机身与功能——配备高速 USB 3.2 接口的紧凑型平板电脑
Pad Mini 拿在手里质感极佳。金属一体式机身设计、玻璃前盖以及纤薄的机身相结合，让这款紧凑型 OPPO 平板电脑拿在手里非常舒适。哑光背板也相对不易留下指纹。
超过89%的屏占比同样令人印象深刻——对于一款小尺寸平板而言，这绝对是相当出色的表现。相比之下：一款 iPad Mini (2024) 在此方面的屏占比仅约77%。据OPPO介绍，这款OLED显示屏四周均采用窄边框设计，四边宽度均精确控制在2.99毫米。
Pad Mini 虽未获得 IP 防护等级认证，但这款 OPPO 平板配备了一个支持 DisplayPort 视频输出的高速 USB 3.2 接口。它还支持最高 67 瓦的快充，以及 LDAC 和 LHDC 5.0 等高解析度蓝牙编解码器。
通信与易用性——小巧的“Android ”平板电脑，配备WiFi 7，但未配备指纹传感器
这款小巧的OPPO平板电脑支持高速Wi-Fi 7标准，包括6 GHz频段。 在与 Wi-Fi 6E 路由器的测试中，我们获得了高且稳定的传输速度。当与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，峰值速度可达 2,000 Mbit/s 以上。
遗憾的是，这款OPPO平板不支持移动网络连接。制造商还省略了指纹传感器——对于Pad Mini这样的紧凑型平板，我们深感这两项功能的缺失，因为它们本可以使其成为一款非常令人期待的 智能手机替代品。
144 Hz OLED 屏幕的输入响应毫无延迟。用户既可用手指操作，也可使用 Oppo Pencil 3 进行操控。该 上一代 （Pencil 2 Pro 或 OnePlus Stylo 2）在我们的测试中无法正常工作。该设备未内置振动马达。
| Networking | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Pad Mini | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续发展——搭载Android 16的iPad Mini替代品
Pad Mini预装了基于Android 16开发的ColorOS 16系统，并支持英语作为系统语言。制造商尚未透露这款紧凑型平板电脑将获得系统更新支持多久。
此外，我们也未能找到关于这款 OPPO 平板电脑所用材料或再生材料占比的任何信息。其包装似乎不含塑料。
相机——OPPO Pad Mini，配备广角镜头和文档模式，适合大学和学校使用
后置摄像头分辨率为1300万像素，光圈为f/2.2。该传感器还支持HDR和4K30视频录制。
这款小巧的平板电脑非常适合在白天拍摄照片。其成像锐度和色彩还原都相当出色。即使在光线较暗的环境下，Pad Mini 也能呈现出可用的成像效果——其实并不比 iPhone 17 在这方面其实并不逊色。
若将其作为数字记事本扫描文档，设备提供带文字识别功能的专用拍照模式。数字变焦最高可达10倍。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏——配备OLED屏幕的紧凑型平板电脑
Pad Mini 的 OLED 屏幕尺寸为 8.8 英寸，屏幕比例为 3:2。得益于 1,680p 的高分辨率，该屏幕实现了近 350 ppi 的高像素密度。 与竞品相比，这款 OPPO 平板电脑的亮度表现尤为突出。特别是在与日常使用密切相关的 APL18 测试模式下，Pad Mini 的表现更是独树一帜。此外，这款高对比度 OLED 面板也非常适合呈现 HDR 内容。
OPPO采用脉宽调制（PWM）技术控制屏幕亮度——我们使用Rigol软件测得其基本频率约为90 Hz。此外，OPPO还采用了3,840 Hz的高频PWM调光技术，从而最大限度地减少了闪烁带来的负面影响。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1142 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.32 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 6955 K
| Oppo Pad Mini AMOLED, 2520x1680, 8.8" | Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) IPS, 3040x1904, 8.8" | Xiaomi Pad Mini TFT-LCD, 3008x1880, 8.8" | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -39% | -9% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1142 | 582 -49% | 681 -40% | 525 -54% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1110 | 560 -50% | 675 -39% | 512 -54% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 93 -2% | 95 0% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.43 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 3.77 -63% | 2 14% | 2 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.61 | 9.18 -64% | 4.7 16% | 4.3 23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 3.4 -6% | 3.4 -6% | 3 6% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.588 85% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6955 93% | 6353 102% | 6922 94% | 7109 91% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1098 | 1195 | 1221 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 91 Hz Amplitude: 16 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 91 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 91 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7798 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来呈平坦状，但这只是由于比例缩放所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
我们使用 Calman 分析软件来检测色彩偏差。“自然”配置文件以 sRGB 色彩空间为目标。单个颜色的差异肉眼几乎难以察觉，但测得的 DeltaE 值可能仍会略低一些。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放与电池续航——搭载骁龙处理器和高速内存的紧凑型Android 平板电脑
OPPO为其紧凑型平板电脑搭载了 骁龙8 Gen 5 ，但未搭载 Elite，但Pad Mini依然展现出令人印象深刻的性能。它采用与 一加15R，但其实际运行速度却不如 联想Legion Tab 5还要慢。就连 Adreno 829 也未能取得最高分，不过在GFXBench严苛的4K测试中超过40帧的帧率，对于休闲游戏来说已经绰绰有余。
在屏幕亮度设置为150 cd/m²的电池测试中，Pad Mini的表现尤为出色。27.5小时的续航时间让这款OPPO平板独树一帜，其续航时间是 iPad Mini的续航时间还多出两倍以上。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (165.4 - 338, n=3) | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
| Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Pad Mini | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) | Xiaomi Pad Mini | Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -43% | -17% | -52% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3896.34 | 3952.6 1% | 3585.32 -8% | 3423 ? -12% | 1987 ? -49% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3487.12 | 3621 4% | 1573.27 -55% | 3012 ? -14% | 1580 ? -55% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 488.94 | 362.1 -26% | 411.55 -16% | 400 ? -18% | 268 ? -45% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 766.82 | 489.6 -36% | 48.23 -94% | 601 ? -22% | 312 ? -59% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad Mini | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad Mini | |
| Oppo Pad Mini | |
Oppo Pad Mini audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (19.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Oppo Pad Mini 8000 mAh | Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) 9000 mAh | Xiaomi Pad Mini 7500 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 5078 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 27.6 | 22 -20% | 19.6 -29% | 12 -57% |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
OPPO Pad Mini 是一款非常出色的平板电脑，但遗憾的是，它可能不会在欧洲正式发售。
它没有提供蜂窝网络版本这一点也令人遗憾。如果它支持蜂窝网络，这款来自 OPPO 的便捷平板电脑本可以成为智能手机的一个有趣替代品。
Oppo Pad Mini
- 06/14/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代方案比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 89.9%  | Oppo Pad Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $432.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $303.99 OnePlus Pad Go 2 128GB 8GB S... 3. $449.00 Apple iPad mini (A17 Pro): A... List Price: 640€ | 279 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.80" 2520x1680 344 PPI AMOLED |
2. 88.3%  | Lenovo Legion Tab 5 (Legion Y700 Gen5) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $1,369.00 Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gamin... 2. $11.89 Case for Lenovo Legion Tab Y... 3. $1,699.99 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 AI Gamin... List Price: 899€ | 360 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.80" 3040x1904 343 PPI IPS |
3. 88.5%  | Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $432.50 XIAOMI Pad 8 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $111.00 Lenovo Tab One - Lightweight... 3. $199.99 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi... List Price: 500€ | 326 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.80" 3008x1880 403 PPI TFT-LCD |
4. 86.6%  | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro ⎘ Apple A17 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1149€ | 297 g | Apple 512GB NVMe | 8.30" 2266x1488 327 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
