刷新电池使用时间记录 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 智能手机评测

Name: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Brand: Apple

橙色铝和玻璃。

哪款 iPhone 最好？不言而喻，Apple ，因为他们的新旗舰 iPhone 机型拥有书本上的所有超级功能。它可能也是一款值得升级的机型，因为与前代机型相比，它在许多细节方面都有了改进。在电池续航时间方面，你甚至可以说 17 Pro Max 正在证明自己是新的 iPhone 终极机型。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/29/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G AI Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

在Apple 的世界里，iPhone 17 Pro Max 树立了标杆，在各个方面都提供了最高的规格：最大的显示屏、最大的电池、最长的电池续航时间、最高的性能，以及高达 2 TB 的存储空间。

Apple 与上一代产品相比，《iphone X》通过一系列微小的改进，再一次成功地打造出了令人信服的整体包装。虽然基本版本的存储空间增加了一倍，但价格却没有增加。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

虽然设计是一个品味问题，但外壳从钛金属换成铝金属，还是给人留下了苦涩的回味。部分原因是它使 XXL iPhone 比前代产品更容易刮花。此外，iPhone 还因保修期短和蓝牙编解码器有限而受到了应有的批评。

Pros

+ 高级外壳

+ 明亮的 OLED 显示屏，120°F（244 毫米）

+ 多功能三摄像头，带 4 倍远摄镜头

+ USB 3.2 Gen.

+ WiFi 7、BT 6.0、UWB、NFC、Thread、双 eSIM 卡

+ 极高性能

+ 超长电池寿命

+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

- 附带的电缆仅为 USB 2.0

- 保修期仅为 12 个月

价格和供应情况

Apple 256 GB 存储空间的 iPhone 17 Pro Max 售价为 1,199 美元。.在撰写本评论时，这款智能手机在其他在线商店的售价略低。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
规格
外壳 - 还是铝合金，而不是钛合金
功能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 配备高达 2 TB 的存储空间
软件 -Apple 手机配备 iOS 26 和长期更新功能
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和通过卫星进行紧急呼叫
电话功能和语音质量
摄像头 - 3x 4800 万像素三摄像头
配件和保修 - 可选保险保护
输入设备和操作 - FaceID 提供高级别的安全性
显示屏 - 6.9 英寸 120 Hz LTPO OLED 显示屏
性能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 和Apple A19 Pro
排放 - 冷却效率高于前代产品
电池续航时间 -Apple 智能手机创下新高
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

iPhone 17 Pro Max 定位为 iPhone 16 Pro Max 的升级版。 iPhone 16 Pro Max.同时（像往常一样），Apple ，为其新旗舰 iPhone 配备了更快的处理器。

它现在配备了新的长焦摄像头和 1800 万像素前置摄像头。此外，最大存储容量增至 2 TB，充电速度也有所提升。

规格

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (iPhone 17 Series)

Processor

Apple A19 Pro 6 x 2.6 - 4.3 GHz

Graphics adapter

Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.90 inch 19.5:9, 2868 x 1320 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, ProMotion, Anti-reflective coating, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Ceramic Shield 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB NVMe, 256 GB

, also available with 512GB, 1TB and 2TB of storage, 236 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, Face ID, OTG, Thread, UWB (Gen. 2)

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 163.4 x 78

Battery

4823 mAh Lithium-Ion, (5088 mAh - eSIM only model), Battery Cycles: 1000, max. charging speed: 40 W (wired) / 25 W (wireless: MagSafe and Qi2)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 26

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.28", 1.22 µm) + 48 MPix (4x optical zoom, f/2.8, 100 mm, 1/2.55", 0.7 µm) + 48 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/2.55", 0.7 µm)
Secondary Camera: 18 MPix (f/1.9, 20 mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, SIM tool, USB-C cable, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC | Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, APFS (encrypted), macOS Extended (HFS+) | Body-SAR: 1.49 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.19 W/kg, fanless, waterproof

Weight

233 g

Price

1449 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 还是铝合金，而不是钛合金

iPhone 17 Pro Max 有银色、深蓝色和宇宙橙色可供选择，从正面看，它与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 并无太大区别。 iPhone 16 Pro Max.我们看到的仍然是 6.9 英寸显示屏，分辨率相同，只是边框略窄。但背面的变化更为明显。

摄像头凸起现在延伸至整个后盖宽度。iPhone 17 Pro Max 也告别了前代产品的钛金属边框，现在采用了铝合金外壳，也占据了背部的大部分面积。这一设计特点仅被一个可实现无线充电的玻璃元件所打断。

尺寸比较

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Honor Magic7 Pro Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Xiaomi 15 Ultra DIN A6 ❌

功能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 配备高达 2 TB 的存储空间

iPhone 17 Pro Max 配备了 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 6.0、UWB、卫星通信和双 eSIM 卡，拥有最先进的功能。此外，你还可以使用 MagSafe 和 Qi2 充电，以及快速 USB-C 端口（USB 3.2 Gen.2）。

iPhone 17 Pro Max 的最小存储容量为 256 GB，还有 512 GB、1 TB 和首次出现在 iPhone 上的 2 TB 存储容量。

软件 -Apple 手机配备 iOS 26 和长期更新功能

每款 iPhone 17 都搭载 iOS 26，其中包括改进的Apple AI 和新的 Liquid Glass 设计。有关新 iOS 版本的更多详情，请访问这里.

Apple 苹果尚未提供有关支持期限的确切细节。不过，由于欧盟要求智能手机在正式停止销售后至少要有五年的更新时间，因此可以推测更新时间为六年。

可持续性

iPhone 17 Pro Max 的可持续发展报告显示智能手机的回收率为 30%。

维修手册和备件可直接从获取。Apple.制造商允许你https://www.apple.com/de/shop/trade-in旧设备，这有助于抵消购买新 iPhone 的费用。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和通过卫星进行紧急呼叫

iPhone 17 Pro Max 支持多种蜂窝网络频率，这意味着你几乎在任何地方都能收到信号。与美国不同，德国的卫星通信仅限于紧急呼叫。

与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 配合使用，iPhone 17 Pro Max 实现了较高且基本稳定的传输速度。不过，在 6 GHz 频段，传输速度可能会稍高一些。

Networking
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼73%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	887 (min: 567) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	762 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1418 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1258 (min: 1190) MBit/s ∼78%
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	984 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	840 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1565 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1620 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1306 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1440 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	739 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1359 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1375 (1300-1419)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1180 (1117-1218)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø910 (769-1042)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø459 (411-477)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)

iPhone 17 Pro Max 在导航方面表现出色。在我们的实际测试中，它对我们的定位几乎和它的对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样准确，而 Garmin Venu 2 能更精确地绘制出路线。

电话功能和语音质量

除 iPhone Air 外，欧盟所有新款 iPhone 均配备实体 SIM 卡插槽。此外，它们还可以使用两个 eSIM 卡。VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话均受支持。

iPhone 17 Pro Max 具有良好的通话质量，甚至能在通话过程中可靠地过滤掉嘈杂的背景噪音。启动免提电话时，声音听起来有点刺耳，但清晰度仍然很高。

摄像头 - 3x 4800 万像素三摄像头

这两款相机拥有众多新功能。其中，iPhone 17 Pro Max 配备了中心舞台自拍摄像头。由于采用了 1800 万像素的方形传感器，它还可以在纵向和横向模式之间自动切换，而无需旋转 iPhone。

现在，三个后置摄像头的分辨率均为 4800 万像素。长焦摄像头现在拥有 4 倍光学变焦，它是这项功能的最大受益者。因为 iPhone 17 Pro和 iPhone 17 Pro Max 的摄像头完全相同，因此我们希望向你提供我们的 iPhone 17 Pro 测试.结论是什么？整体图像质量一流，只有少数弱点。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image Daylight image Ultra-wide angle Low light image

click to load images

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

click to load images

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

click to load images

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

click to load images

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

在可控的照明条件下，测试图图像几乎完全清晰。在表现参考色方面，主镜头的表现也令人印象深刻。只有在某些绿色和蓝色色调中才会出现与目标值的轻微偏差。

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: 9.11 ∆E min: 1.69 - max: 14.29 ∆E

配件和保修 - 可选保险保护

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 随附一条 USB-C 连接线和一个 SIM 卡工具。

Apple 手机提供 12 个月保修。可通过AppleCare+ 延长保修期。保险套餐的帮助下延长保修期。

输入设备和操作 - FaceID 提供高级别的安全性

iPhone 17 Pro Max 可通过 Face ID 进行生物识别身份验证。它的 3D 面部识别功能具有很高的安全性，在我们的测试中运行无误。

触觉引擎负责振动，并提供良好的触觉反馈。你会认出前代产品中的拍照键和操作键。

显示屏 - 6.9 英寸 120 Hz LTPO OLED 显示屏

iPhone 17 Pro Max 的 OLED 屏幕支持所有常见的 HDR 标准，据说亮度比上一代产品更高：

根据Apple ，亮度可高达 3,000 尼特，但我们测试设备的显示屏最大亮度为 2,344 cd/m²，仍然非常亮。


1042 cd/m²	1059 cd/m²	1098 cd/m²
1043 cd/m²	1054 cd/m²	1088 cd/m²
1023 cd/m²	1039 cd/m²	1089 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1098 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1059.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1054 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.57 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
CCT: 6993 K

	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"	Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Xiaomi 15 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen		-17%	31%	-23%	5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1054	1055 0%	1607 52%	1357 29%	1041 -1%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1059	1061 0%	1609 52%	1350 27%	1059 0%
Brightness Distribution (%)	93	93 0%	95 2%	94 1%	96 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.57	1.5 4%	0.9 43%	3.1 -97%	1 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.8	4.7 -68%	1.8 36%	4.7 -68%	2.7 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	2.3 -35%	1.7 -0%	2.2 -29%	1.9 -12%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2 ^110%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6993 ^93%	6625 ^98%	6346 ^102%	6391 ^102%	6697 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 17 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

OLED 显示屏发光非常均匀，色彩显示非常准确。不过，其 240 Hz PWM 频率并不算高。虽然可以在可访问选项中激活显示脉冲平滑（确保更平缓的振幅响应）。对 PWM 比较敏感的用户在购买前应了解一下该设备，看看它是否真的能缓解这一问题。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3 ms rise
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3 ms rise
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

iPhone 17 Pro Max 的显示屏表面反光程度低于前代产品，非常适合户外使用。尽管如此，iPhone 与 S25 Ultra 上的抗反射涂层仍有一定差距。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.

性能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 和Apple A19 Pro

XXL iPhone 配备 12GB RAM，采用全新的 Apple A19 Pro.尽管它在骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy但在 GPU 性能测试中，它的速度却不尽如人意。总之，A19 Pro 仍是最快的智能手机 SoC 之一，也是一款能很好地执行人工智能任务的处理器。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | AImark | Geekbench AI

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3883 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (3785 - 3888, n=4)	3840 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	3479 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points -18%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3099 Points -20%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3050 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=209, last 2 years)	1717 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	10017 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (9509 - 10105, n=4)	9932 Points -1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9685 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9019 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	8568 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=209, last 2 years)	5017 Points -50%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	2629691 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2534721 Points -4%
Average Apple A19 Pro (2053750 - 2806319, n=3)	2496587 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2474369 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2262067 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	1739816 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)	1439819 Points -45%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	37611 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (35571 - 37611, n=3)	36868 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	33044 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)	27279 Points -27%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2021 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1923 Points -95%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1796 Points -95%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Apple A19 Pro (5143 - 5210, n=3)	5169 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	5155 Points
Average of class Smartphone (81 - 5210, n=44, last 2 years)	915 Points -82%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	36297 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (35152 - 36297, n=3)	35780 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=44, last 2 years)	4327 Points -88%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average Apple A19 Pro (48126 - 49889, n=3)	48948 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	48828 Points
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=44, last 2 years)	6166 Points -87%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	5959 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5933 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5794 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	4739 Points -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	6033 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5809 Points -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5800 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	4752 Points -21%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	26375 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23837 Points -10%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21937 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	18368 Points -30%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	11776 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10066 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9972 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	8146 Points -31%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	12447 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10634 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	10070 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	8264 Points -34%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2588 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points -7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2334 Points -10%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2334 (17.3^min - 17.3^max) Points -10%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2248 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	1715 Points -34%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2679 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2272 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2253 Points -16%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2253 (16.7^min - 16.7^max) Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2069 Points -23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	748 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	717 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	631 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	536 fps -28%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps +15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	418 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	410 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	368 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	324 fps -21%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	294 fps +4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	293 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	282 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	225 fps -20%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	114 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	97 fps +62%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	207 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	179 fps -14%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	143 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	102 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	91 fps +52%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +24%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	106 fps +23%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	86 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	56 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	259 fps +5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	257 fps +4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	247 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	184 fps -26%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +43%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49 fps +35%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps +21%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	36.4 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	30 fps -18%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	358.295 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	353.735 Points -1%
Average Apple A19 Pro (327 - 358, n=3)	338 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	315.056 Points -12%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	284.674 Points -21%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)	257.756 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=154, last 2 years)	153.4 Points -57%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	643 runs/min
Average Apple A19 Pro (598 - 643, n=3)	621 runs/min -3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	557 runs/min -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	425 runs/min -34%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	419 runs/min -35%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)	390 runs/min -39%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=131, last 2 years)	215 runs/min -67%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	42.8 runs/min
Average Apple A19 Pro (40.7 - 42.8, n=3)	41.7 runs/min -3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	33.5 runs/min -22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min -32%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	26.1 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra	25 runs/min -42%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=121, last 2 years)	14.2 runs/min -67%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	306 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (297 - 306, n=3)	302 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	271 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	236 Points -23%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	196 Points -36%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)	171 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)	143.9 Points -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	121337 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (115463 - 121337, n=3)	118673 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	100368 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points -18%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	89248 Points -26%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)	73424 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)	47999 Points -60%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)	1194 ms * -365%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)	508.2 ms * -98%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	429.4 ms * -67%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * -47%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)	279.4 ms * -9%
Average Apple A19 Pro (257 - 280, n=3)	269 ms * -5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	256.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

排放 - 冷却效率高于前代产品

温度

在正常使用过程中，iPhone 17 Pro Max 保持凉爽宜人，但在最大负载情况下，表面温度会升至 42°C。虽然触感温热，但仍符合热安全标准。

在负载情况下 iPhone 16 Pro Max改进后的散热功能大显身手--这里的关键词是蒸发腔。根据 3DMark 场景的不同，性能节流有时会明显降低，有趣的是，前代产品在Steel Nomad 测试中的得分仍然更高。

Max. Load

Idle


41.1 °C	40.5 °C	37.8 °C
41.8 °C	40.7 °C	38.3 °C
41.4 °C	42 °C	37.9 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 40.2 °C


38.1 °C	39.9 °C	40.3 °C
37.9 °C	39.2 °C	40.8 °C
38.3 °C	39.7 °C	42.3 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 39.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	99.8 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	94.6 % -5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	63 % -37%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.6 % -42%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	71.8 %
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.6 % -6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	65.5 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	72.6 % 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	72.6 %
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	66.6 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.7 % -32%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	73.4 % +13%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.4 % +6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65 % 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	64.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % -22%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25 (22.7-31.7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30 (26.1-38.6)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø96 (74.7-129.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.7 (86-136.6)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø130.1 (116-160.6)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.3 (112-151.3)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.8 (98.3-163.3)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.1 (112.2-145.2)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.2 (26-40.5)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.7 (23.5-36.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.5 (22.5-41.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.3 (26.6-36.7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.5 (25.1-37.7)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.2 (12.6-19.5)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (11.3-16.6)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.2 (11.9-18.3)

发言人

音质出色的立体声扬声器给我们留下了深刻印象，高音和中音非常线性。不过，不出所料，它们几乎没有低音。您可以通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 6.0 连接外部音频设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Apple 智能手机创下新高

耗电量

iPhone 的充电功率最高可达 40 瓦，不过在我们的测试中偶尔也会超过这一限制。无线充电的功率可达 25 瓦。

使用第三方电源适配器（Anker 317，100 瓦）进行完整的充电周期大约需要 1 小时 25 分钟。40 分钟后，电池电量已达 70%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load	4.1 / 11.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 15 Ultra 5410 mAh	Average Apple A19 Pro	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		5%	-48%	-38%	-1%	-32%	-25%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.6	0.42 30%	0.94 -57%	0.55 8%	0.49 18%	0.56 ?(0.52 - 0.6, n=3) 7%	0.856 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years) -43%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.3	1.55 -19%	1.5 -15%	0.77 41%	0.87 33%	1.677 ?(1.3 - 1.95, n=3) -29%	1.437 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.6	1.58 1%	1.57 2%	0.91 43%	0.94 41%	1.823 ?(1.6 - 1.98, n=3) -14%	1.612 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) -1%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.1	3.41 17%	11.03 -169%	13.81 -237%	8.82 -115%	7.92 ?(4.1 - 12.4, n=3) -93%	7.1 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=140, last 2 years) -73%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.5	11.82 -3%	11.68 -2%	16.69 -45%	9.26 19%	15.1 ?(11.5 - 17.7, n=3) -31%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=140, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.59 (0.702-11.1)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.44 (0.757-16.7)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.82 (0.623-9.24)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.573 (0.516-0.889)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.3-11.5)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.9 (12.7-16.6)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.2 (8.42-9.27)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.573 (0.516-0.889)

电池寿命

说到电池续航时间，Apple 手机为 iPhone 树立了新的标杆。将近 29 小时的续航时间不仅大大超过了前代产品，也超过了高端竞争对手，尽管其中一些竞争对手的电池容量要大得多。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		28h 36min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	28.6 h
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh	20.8 h
Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	24.7 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	22.2 h
Xiaomi 15 Ultra 5410 mAh	21.2 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

通过 iPhone 17 Pro Max，Apple 并没有重塑其顶级智能手机，而是在此基础上进行了改进。 iPhone 16 Pro Max在许多方面进行了改进，而且所有这些改进都没有提高其入门级机型的价格。这款 6.9 英寸设备在电池续航时间方面的表现尤其出色，但其设计可能会让一些买家望而却步。

Back to the verdict

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max - 10/27/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

70 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

95%

Display

91%

Games Performance

39 / 55 → 70%

Application Performance

95 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

96%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 90 → 92%

Camera

87%

Average

84%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
87.4%

Materials
65%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
96%

Repairability
76%

Software Updates
83.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 83.8%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.2%	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $59.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech... 2. $37.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili... 3. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1449 Euro	233 g	256 GB NVMe	6.90" 2868x1320 460 PPI OLED
2. 88.6%	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $39.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Sili... 2. $37.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea... 3. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1449€	227 g	256 GB NVMe	6.90" 2868x1320 458 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED
3. 89.2%	Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro... 2. $9.99 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono... 3. $11.99 Charger Compatible with Hono... List Price: 1300€	223 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED
4. 89.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $1,054.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... 2. $1,157.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra ... 3. $7.57 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... List Price: 1449€	218 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5. 89.5%	Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ... 2. $9.29 Zeking [2 Pack for Xiaomi 15... 3. $8.99 Kicvbnco 3 Pack For Xiaomi 1... List Price: 1499€	229 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED

刷新电池使用时间记录 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 智能手机评测

橙色铝和玻璃。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳 - 还是铝合金，而不是钛合金

尺寸比较

功能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 配备高达 2 TB 的存储空间

软件 -Apple 手机配备 iOS 26 和长期更新功能

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和通过卫星进行紧急呼叫

电话功能和语音质量

摄像头 - 3x 4800 万像素三摄像头

配件和保修 - 可选保险保护

输入设备和操作 - FaceID 提供高级别的安全性

显示屏 - 6.9 英寸 120 Hz LTPO OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - iPhone 17 Pro Max 和Apple A19 Pro

排放 - 冷却效率高于前代产品

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Apple 智能手机创下新高

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency