对摩托罗拉 Moto G77 的评价
摩托罗拉 Moto G77 是一款极具吸引力的超薄中端智能手机。这款手机具有良好的扬声器和高亮度显示屏，同时电池续航能力也同样出色。
得益于摩托罗拉采用 Pantone 颜色和人造皮革背面的设计理念，这款手机拥有不会变形的高品质外观和出色的做工。
不过，Moto G77 没有任何形式的完全防水保护，也没有 microSD 读卡器。因此，你只能使用 256 GB 的存储空间，可惜速度并不快。
此外，SoC 还需要更多的电力，才能实现更流畅的运行。
指纹传感器在屏幕上的位置很低，但工作可靠。软件的更新期为四年，这实际上不符合欧盟的规定。
摄像头拍摄的照片效果不错，但你不应该期待太多的灵活性。
总的来说，摩托罗拉 Moto G77 是一款纤薄、美观的中端手机，电池续航时间不错，但性能还需进一步提高。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Moto G77 在亚马逊（Amazon.de）等在线零售商的起价约为 280 欧元。摩托罗拉 G77 尚未在美国上市，但在美国亚马逊上可以以 299.99 美元的价格无锁购买到与之相当的摩托罗拉 G Power 2026。
规格
构造和功能：潘通色和 eSIM
摩托罗拉的设计理念依赖于潘通色。这些颜色通常是由类似合成革的材料制成的背面颜色，我们的 Moto G77 就是这种情况。可供选择的颜色包括略带棕黑色的 Black Olive 和蓝绿色的 Shaded Spruce。
机身做工精良，不易扭曲。与前代产品相比 Moto G75相比，尽管电池容量略有增加，但我们的测试设备明显更轻薄。
Moto G77 并不具备真正的防水功能，只能防止溅水。
这款智能手机安装了 8GB RAM 和 256GB 存储空间，这使其与同类其他手机相当。无法通过 microSD 进行内存扩展。除了 nano-SIM 卡，还可以使用 eSIM 卡。
通信和操作：较慢的无线局域网
Moto G77 只能提供 Wi-Fi 5。令人惊讶的是，考虑到 Moto G75 已经提供了 Wi-Fi 6，而 OnePlus Nord CE 5 也提供了 Wi-Fi 6。 OnePlus Nord CE 5表明，在这个价格范围内，Wi-Fi 6 可以达到更高的速度。
遗憾的是，你只能使用 MIMO 1x1 的典型 Wi-Fi 5 速度。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，我们也观察到了轻微的掉线现象。
许多 4G 和 5G 频率都可用于移动通信。在我们使用随机样本进行的测试中，接收基本稳定。
指纹识别器隐藏在屏幕后面，位置比较靠下。这对小手来说是件好事，但如果手机外壳突出，就会出现问题。
读取器反应迅速，解锁时间短。还可以通过前置摄像头进行 2D 人脸识别。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G75 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性：四年更新
Android 16 预装，计划更新至 2030 年 1 月。此外，还计划更新系统至Android 19。这是一个合理的期限，但三星等其他制造商提供的安全更新期限要长得多。
在可持续发展方面，手机包装盒不使用塑料。除此之外，关于回收配额或二氧化碳排放量的信息尚不得而知。
相机：感光但更轻薄
摩托罗拉的主摄像头高达 10800 万像素，采用 f/1.7 大光圈，光线充足，给人留下深刻印象。不过，与前代产品相比，其视频功能有所降低：无法再拍摄 4K 视频。
主摄像头拍摄的图像看起来光线充足，细节也不错。但在弱光环境下，暗部的动态范围会迅速缩小。另外还有一个 800 万像素广角摄像头，但拍摄的照片并不精细。
3200 万像素自拍摄像头可拍摄出相当不错的自拍照，细节也可以接受。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: PlantMain camera: EnvironmentMain camera: Low lightWide-angle camera
显示屏非常明亮，色彩准确
Moto G77 的 AMOLED 屏幕具有出色的亮度，因此即使在明亮的环境中也能保持稳定。色彩还原也非常准确。
不过，你必须忍受 100 Hz 范围内的 PWM 闪烁。因此，对屏幕敏感的人应该在购买前试用一下。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1558 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.79 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6489 K
| Motorola Moto G77 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G75 IPS, 2388x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -71% | -25% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1558 | 947 -39% | 979 -37% | 1315 -16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1526 | 946 -38% | 969 -37% | 1300 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 95 -1% | 95 -1% | 97 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.46 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.79 | 2.53 -220% | 1.3 -65% | 1.22 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.97 | 4.91 -65% | 2.6 12% | 2.7 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.1 -62% | 1.6 -23% | 2 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.237 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.258 97% |
| CCT | 6489 100% | 6733 97% | 6688 97% | 6503 100% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2059 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 103 Hz Amplitude: 10 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 103 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 103 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7999 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命需要更多动力
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6400在性能方面，联发科 Dimensity 6400 显得相当薄弱，让 Moto G77 在竞争中略显落后。一般来说，它足以满足流畅运行的要求，但对于要求苛刻的任务来说，它的储备并不多。
即使在长时间负载的情况下，外壳上的热量积聚仍然非常适中，我们只能在 3DMark 压力测试中检测到极小的节流现象。
混合立体声扬声器的声音非常好听，也很强劲，但在全音量时高音会变得很重。如果将音量调低一档，就能获得更加饱满的音效。许多音频编解码器都可通过蓝牙 5.4 进行无线声音传输。
5,200 毫安时电池是同类产品中的典型配置。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，Moto G77 的续航时间略低于 20 小时，实现了良好的性价比，超过了同价位的大多数竞争对手。在不充电的情况下，中度使用手机也能轻松续航一天。
如果需要插入电源，由于充电速度为 30 瓦，大约 1:30 小时就能充满电。
| Motorola Moto G77 | Motorola Moto G75 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 5 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 60% | 50% | 62% | -4% | 170% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 522.1 | 1023.1 96% | 911.87 75% | 1235 137% | 817 ? 56% | 2131 ? 308% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 494.6 | 868.4 76% | 867.34 75% | 795 61% | 381 ? -23% | 1834 ? 271% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 217.2 | 285.3 31% | 222.77 3% | 222 2% | 170.8 ? -21% | 293 ? 35% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 206.2 | 279.5 36% | 302.72 47% | 302 46% | 146.2 ? -29% | 344 ? 67% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G75 | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Moto G75 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G75 | |
Motorola Moto G77 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G77 5200 mAh | Motorola Moto G75 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G 5520 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -2% | -17% | -15% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 50 | 50.4 1% | 36.6 -27% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 20 | 19.6 -2% | 19 -5% | 16.9 -15% |
| Load (h) | 5.2 | 5 -4% | 4.2 -19% | |
| H.264 (h) | 22.2 | 21.1 |
Notebookcheck 对摩托罗拉 Moto G77 的总体印象
摩托罗拉 Moto G77 外观时尚、相当轻巧，而且具有良好的扬声器和明亮的屏幕。不过，在性能方面仍有改进的余地。
Motorola Moto G77
- 03/01/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.7%  | Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 300€ | 182 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 77.4%  | Motorola Moto G75 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 299€ | 205 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" 2388x1080 387 PPI IPS |
3. 76.5%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $339.99 List Price: 300€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED |
4. 80.8%  | OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: List Price: 349€ | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
