这块 OLED 屏幕让 Galaxy A57 黯然失色：Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 评测

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

高性能阻尼器。

小米这款全新 Android 手机能否在我们的评测中摘得 2026 年续航之王的桂冠？这款价格亲民的小米手机配备了 8,340 mAh 电池，同时还搭载 Gorilla Glass Victus 2、6.83 英寸 CrystalRes AMOLED 显示屏和 Snapdragon SoC。然而，我们的测试揭示了这款曾经备受瞩目的中端手机存在诸多令人意外的短板。它还值得购买吗？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/06/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 评测结论

Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 在我们的测试中给人留下了极为矛盾的印象。至少到了今年的 Pro 机型，Xiaomi 已经打破了将 Redmi Note 系列定位为兼顾全面表现与高性价比的传统。相反，2026 款凭借出色的耐用性，包括 IP69K 认证、多项 TÜV 和 SGS 认证，以及极佳的电池续航，进一步向颇具吸引力的户外伴侣定位靠拢。再加上亮度极高的 AMOLED 显示屏，这款 Xiaomi 手机为户外爱好者提供了充分的选择理由。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

然而，与中端竞品相比，一些明显的退步抵消了这些优势，在这个价位上成为了不容忽视的问题。主摄像头上的成本削减令人难以理解，拍摄效果也令人失望，尤其是在弱光和变焦拍摄时。

Xiaomi 在性能方面也失策了：搭配 6 GB 内存的 Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 性能相当平庸，甚至落后于更老的 Note 15 Pro。Samsung Galaxy A57 或 Poco X8 Pro 的价格更低，图形性能有时却能达到其两倍。

此外，Note 系列的 Pro 机型正逐年明显变重。再加上大量使用塑料材质，恐怕很难让人提起兴趣。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板

+ 高频 PWM 调光

+ 坚固的做工

+ 长期更新支持

+ 出色的续航表现

Cons

- SoC 性能较弱

- 相机画质下降

- 大量使用塑料

- 仅支持 WiFi 5

- 扬声器声音缺乏层次感

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 的价格和上市情况

Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 在德国提供两种存储配置，6 GB RAM + 256 GB 和 8 GB RAM + 512 GB，以及三种配色，建议零售价约 €480 起。可通过 Amazon.de 等零售商购买，也可直接从制造商处购买。不过，目前的实际售价明显更低，约 €350 起。

$779.50
XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC Global ROM Unlocked 50MP Triple Pro Leica Cam eSIM 6.83" 144Mhz Model 2602EPTC0G Liberado (Black)
$379.50
XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Plus 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Ultra Camera Model 2510ERA8BG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Mocha Brown)
$399.50
XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Plus 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Ultra Camera Model 2510ERA8BG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Glacier Blue)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 评测结论
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 规格参数
机身：坚固耐用的 Xiaomi 智能手机，具备 IP 防护等级并采用 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
特性：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 不支持 USB 3.1，但配备红外发射器
软件：价格实惠且享有长期更新支持的中端智能手机
通信与 GNSS：不支持 WiFi 7、采用单频 GPS 的 Xiaomi 智能手机
通话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 支持双 SIM 卡和 eSIM
摄像头：配备光学防抖和 5000 万像素摄像头的中端智能手机
配件与保修：不附带充电器的中端智能手机
输入设备与操作：配备光学指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机
显示屏：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED 屏幕支持 DC 调光和 PWM 调光
性能：Xiaomi 智能手机采用 Snapdragon 芯片组，配备最高 8 GB RAM
排放：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 在负载下仅有轻微的性能下降
电池续航：配备硅碳电池并支持快充的平价 Android 智能手机
Notebookcheck 总体评价
可能的替代方案对比

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 规格参数

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 17 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 8c/8t, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78/A55

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 710

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.45 x 78.27

Battery

8340 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67W wired, PD3.0, silicon-carbon anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/2.76", PDAF, OIS) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, 15 mm, ultrawide, 1/4.0"), videos 1080p@30fps, camera API: Full
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, Videos @1080p/30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, info material, case, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.90W/kg head, 0.93W/kg body | Single Band GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C), Galileo, QZSS | IP68/IP69K | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, fanless, waterproof

Released

08/27/2026

Weight

223 g

Price

480 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身：坚固耐用的 Xiaomi 智能手机，具备 IP 防护等级并采用 Gorilla Glass Victus 2

Redmi Note 17 Pro 的机身有不少亮点，但在手感方面存在一些不足。正面是一大亮点，屏占比高达近 90%。这意味着，在这一价位段，其屏幕边框极为纤细。Gorilla Glass Victus 2 也为屏幕提供了保护。

另一方面，Xiaomi 在这款中端手机上大量使用塑料，因此背面和边框的质感并不显得特别高档。由于电池容量巨大，机身也相当厚重。

不过，其耐用性令人信服。机身具备符合 IP68 和 IP69K 标准的防护能力。TÜV SÜD 还认证 Redmi Note 17 Pro 可在 2 米深的水下保持 72 小时防水。此外，这款 Xiaomi 手机通过了 SGS 认证，据称能够承受从最高 3 米处跌落至花岗岩表面的冲击。电池也表现得十分坚韧：据 Xiaomi 称，在实验室条件下，它经受住了极端环境考验，例如在 -40 °C 至 75 °C 的高低温条件下进行模拟储存和放电。

尺寸对比

Nothing Phone (4a) Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A57 Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro DIN A6 ❌

特性：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 不支持 USB 3.1，但配备红外发射器

Xiaomi 的这款中端手机提供了该价位应有的配置。电子罗盘、NFC、红外发射器和 USB OTG 均一应俱全。不过，它并未配备支持通过线缆输出图像信号的高速 USB 3 接口。Miracast 可用于无线投屏。在我们的测试中，Redmi Note 17 Pro 连接 Samsung Portable SSD T7 时，传输速度较低，仅略低于 29 MBit/s。

软件：价格实惠且享有长期更新支持的中端智能手机

Redmi Note 17 Pro 将获得六年的安全更新，而 Android 版本预计将升级至 Android 21。这款搭载 Android 16 的 2026 年机型尚未列入安全中心。

HyperOS 3 中显示的广告很显眼。

可持续性

Xiaomi 未提供任何真正可靠的有关其生态足迹的信息。据制造商称，这款 Redmi 手机受益于 Xiaomi 的 ESG 措施，例如避免在包装中使用塑料、采用 CO₂ 排放量较低的铁路和海运路线，以及自助维修计划。Note 17 Pro 未使用塑料薄膜。

通信与 GNSS：不支持 WiFi 7、采用单频 GPS 的 Xiaomi 智能手机

Xiaomi 的成本削减体现在速度较慢的 WiFi 5 标准上，可能也体现在天线配置上，因为这款 Redmi 手机在我们的测试中仅达到了 350 MBit/s 的低速峰值。不过，在移动通信方面，得益于对 5G 的支持和众多 LTE 频段，Note 17 Pro 的配置要出色得多。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	362 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	340 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼19%
Nothing Phone (4a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 930) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	830 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	994 (min: 958) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	919 (min: 778) MBit/s ∼65%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	825 (min: 792) MBit/s ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼44%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	309 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	315 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	345 (min: 304) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	349 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	656 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	687 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1643 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1792 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø214 (175-268) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø364 (246-412) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø362 (347-371) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø340 (319-353) MBit/s

在户外，Redmi Note 17 Pro 借助单频 GNSS 和 SBAS 支持，能够快速、准确地定位用户，精度约为 3 米。在我们的实际测试中，与 Garmin Venu 2 相比，这款 Xiaomi 手机的定位表现相当精准。不过，仍能观察到轻微的路线偏差。由于这些偏差完全处于可接受范围内，因此可以毫不犹豫地推荐这款中端智能手机用于导航。

通话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 支持双 SIM 卡和 eSIM

Note 17 Pro 支持双 SIM 卡，可使用两张 nanoSIM 卡或一张 nanoSIM 卡搭配一张 eSIM。它也支持 VoLTE、VoNR 和 VoWiFi 等重要的手机功能。通话音质良好，通过听筒可以清晰地听懂对方的声音。

摄像头：配备光学防抖和 5000 万像素摄像头的中端智能手机

Redmi 粉丝恐怕会对 2026 款机型的主摄大失所望。Note 15 Pro 那颗尺寸相当大的 200 MP 传感器被 ISOCELL JN 传感器取代，后者很可能是 JN1，尺寸几乎只有前者的一半。因此，Note 17 Pro 的进光量明显减少，尤其在复杂光照条件下表现不佳。在我们暗光环境下拍摄的测试照片中，自动对焦也显得力不从心。好在它至少配备了光学防抖。

由于依然没有长焦镜头，换用小尺寸传感器就更加令人不满。因此，Note 17 Pro 拍摄的变焦照片画质较差，因为画面裁切进一步放大了 ISOCELL JN 的弱点。

仅有 8 MP 的广角摄像头尚可接受，但即便在最便宜的中端机型中，也顶多算是中规中矩。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light 5x zoom Ultra-wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修：不附带充电器的中端智能手机

我们的测试设备随附一根 USB-C 线缆、一个 SIM 卡取卡针、一个保护壳和一张保修卡。根据保修卡，Note 17 Pro 仅提供 12 个月保修。67 瓦 HyperCharger 需单独购买。

输入设备与操作：配备光学指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机

大尺寸 OLED 屏幕的触控采样率为 240 Hz，输入可被即时识别，毫无延迟。开启 Game Turbo 模式后，瞬时触控采样率还会提升至 3,200 Hz。光学指纹传感器位于屏幕边缘较低的位置，但能够快速、可靠地解锁 Redmi 手机。用户也可根据需要使用安全性较低的 2D 人脸识别。

显示屏：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED 屏幕支持 DC 调光和 PWM 调光

这款 Xiaomi 手机的一大亮点是清晰锐利的 AMOLED 屏幕，其刷新率最高可达 120 Hz，亮度也非常高。在对日常使用具有重要意义的 APL 测量中，Note 17 Pro 的亮度几乎是 Galaxy A57 的两倍。

这款 Redmi 智能手机在 PWM 方面也胜过其 Samsung 竞争对手。我们测得了约 120 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁，以及 Xiaomi 宣传的最高可达 3,840 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。我们记录到的实测值为 3,571 Hz，振幅相当平缓。在较高亮度下也支持 DC 调光。


1062 cd/m²	1048 cd/m²	1065 cd/m²
1068 cd/m²	1053 cd/m²	1070 cd/m²
1072 cd/m²	1056 cd/m²	1069 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1072 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1062.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1053 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6747 K

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Nothing Phone (4a) AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Display		-66%	-54%	-19%	-43%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	4034	1455 -64%	1920 -52%	3475 -14%	1953 -52%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	4440	1403 -68%	1980 -55%	3406 -23%	2922 -34%
Response Times		-139%	5%	10%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	1.6 ?(0.782, 0.8195)	8.18 ?(0.3435, 7.836) -411%	1.21 ?(0.59, 0.622) 24%	1.11 ?(0.5685, 0.5415) 31%	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) 13%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	1.3 ?(0.667, 0.632)	0.99 ?(0.497, 0.49) 24%	1.1 ?(0.543, 0.5595) 15%	1.05 ?(0.5245, 0.529) 19%	1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8) -8%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	120	90	240	120	120.5
PWM Amplitude * (%)	13.42	17.49 -30%	16.72 -25%	16.04 -20%	16 -19%
Screen		20%	27%	25%	-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1053	1536 46%	1135 8%	1104 5%	1155 10%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1063	1538 45%	1134 7%	1102 4%	1136 7%
Brightness Distribution (%)	98	97 -1%	99 1%	97 -1%	97 -1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.9	2.6 10%	1.7 41%	1.2 59%	2.42 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.9	5.7 -16%	2.5 49%	2.4 51%	5.63 -15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	2 33%	1.4 53%	2.1 30%	3.7 -23%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.08 ^106%	2.22 ^99%	2.246 ^98%
CCT	6747 ^96%	6878 ^95%	6578 ^99%	6472 ^100%	7263 ^89%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-62% / -39%	-7% / 6%	5% / 13%	-16% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.42 %
Secondary Frequency: 3571 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别下不同亮度设置的测量序列（虽然最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平的，但这是缩放比例所致。信息框显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大版本。）

在我们的测量中，Redmi Note 17 的色彩偏差处于目标范围内（<3），不过，看看它的 Poco 姐妹机型就会发现，Xiaomi 显然有能力做得更好。轻微的偏差肉眼可见。这会在日常使用中令人困扰吗？大概不会。

色彩准确度（配置文件：Vivid + Standard，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.667 ms rise
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.632 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.782 ms rise
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8195 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

性能：Xiaomi 智能手机采用 Snapdragon 芯片组，配备最高 8 GB RAM

继相机方面的失误之后，Redmi Note 17 Pro 又在芯片组上失策。我们的测试设备配备 6 GB RAM，搭载 Snapdragon 6s Gen 4，性能表现非常一般。就连其前代机型也比这款 2026 年机型更快，尤其是在 AI 测试中。在 Geekbench 多核测试中，Poco X8 Pro 的得分几乎是其两倍，而目前的售价却比 Redmi Note 17 Pro 更具吸引力。

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (514 - 4055, n=40, last 2 years)	1585 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	1222 Points +39%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1164 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1107 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	881 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (n=1)	881 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 11622, n=40, last 2 years)	5504 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	4470 Points +70%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	3323 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	2990 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	2622 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (n=1)	2622 Points 0%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=190, last 2 years)	1875 Points +85%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1564 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	1378 Points +36%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1259 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1050 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (1012 - 1014, n=2)	1013 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	1012 Points
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6478 Points +124%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=190, last 2 years)	5692 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	4509 Points +56%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	3393 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2939 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (2898 - 2930, n=2)	2914 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	2898 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	16598 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	15108 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=133, last 2 years)	15063 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13662 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (11993 - 14722, n=2)	13358 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	11993 Points

Antutu v11 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=45, last 2 years)	2449165 Points +189%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	2004340 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	1414040 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	848400 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (823021 - 848400, n=2)	835711 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9423 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=113, last 2 years)	8084 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	6737 Points +46%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	5610 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	5002 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4611 - 4711, n=2)	4661 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	4611 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=113, last 2 years)	11700 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	11003 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10865 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	10270 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	9076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (8570 - 9076, n=2)	8823 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	8526 Points -6%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10367 Points +102%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=113, last 2 years)	9567 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	8343 Points +63%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	7679 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (5133 - 5807, n=2)	5470 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	5133 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4953 Points -4%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	39353 Points +483%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=113, last 2 years)	25230 Points +274%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	13352 Points +98%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	9405 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8704 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (6753 - 6913, n=2)	6833 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	6753 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	1801 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1785 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=113, last 2 years)	1752 Points +30%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1609 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1402 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (1343 - 1431, n=2)	1387 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	1343 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	51276 Points +546%
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=99, last 2 years)	18908 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	11868 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (7933 - 8777, n=2)	8355 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8301 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	7933 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	29976 Points +5187%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=67, last 2 years)	13892 Points +2350%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	1030 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	567 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (558 - 567, n=2)	563 Points -1%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	921 Points +587%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	571 Points +326%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 7066, n=134, last 2 years)	543 Points +305%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	284 Points +112%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	247 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (123 - 134, n=2)	128.5 Points -4%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	7194 Points +4761%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 35139, n=134, last 2 years)	1450 Points +880%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1329 Points +798%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	284 Points +92%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	249 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	148 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (122 - 148, n=2)	135 Points -9%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9298 Points +2284%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2645 Points +578%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 48271, n=134, last 2 years)	2216 Points +468%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	637 Points +63%
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	581 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	390 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (346 - 390, n=2)	368 Points -6%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=18, last 2 years)	371 Points
Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192	128 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years)	6280 Points +1919%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4709 Points +1414%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	540 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (311 - 337, n=2)	324 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, Adreno 710, 6144	311 Points

在 GPU 测试中，搭载 Adreno 710 的 Xiaomi 手机表现甚至不如其前代机型。即便是搭载 Exynos 1680 的 Galaxy A57，在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中也比 Redmi Note 17 Pro 领先高达 146%。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4304 Points +481%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1718 Points +132%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1115 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1012 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	741 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4311 Points +479%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1721 Points +131%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1118 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1010 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	744 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14679 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6154 Points +107%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4372 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2977 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	703 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	712 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1529 Points
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	784 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	404 Points
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	401 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1563 Points
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	772 Points
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	408 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	405 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	575 fps +391%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	179 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 fps +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	223 fps +228%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +253%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps +288%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88 fps +418%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +153%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	113 fps +371%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	71 fps +407%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +207%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64 fps +392%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps +162%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps +383%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps +148%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	163 fps +329%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps +89%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29 fps +409%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps +146%
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.7 fps

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	178.3 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=117, last 2 years)	157.1 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	119.362 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (118.3 - 119.4, n=2)	118.8 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112.67 Points -6%
2.2 Total
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=104, last 2 years)	204 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	203.905 Points +61%
Nothing Phone (4a) (Chrome 147)	197.209 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	195.451 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (126.5 - 131.3, n=2)	128.9 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	126.463 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	122.478 Points -3%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	236 runs/min +74%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=73, last 2 years)	235 runs/min +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	136 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (113 - 136, n=2)	124.5 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	123 runs/min -10%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	14.8 runs/min +55%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=81, last 2 years)	14.5 runs/min +52%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	13.9 runs/min +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	9.56 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (7.1 - 9.56, n=2)	8.33 runs/min -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	7.49 runs/min -22%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	159 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 278, n=90, last 2 years)	135.5 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	122 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (116 - 122, n=2)	119 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112 Points -8%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	62098 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	55771 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years)	50757 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	39091 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	38676 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (34926 - 39091, n=2)	37009 Points -5%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	1072.9 ms * -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (1008 - 1093, n=2)	1051 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G (Chrome 151)	1008.1 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=120, last 2 years)	852 ms * +15%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	821.9 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149)	776.8 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G	Nothing Phone (4a)	Samsung Galaxy A57	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		1%	-28%	29%	-29%	-4%	18%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	2098.67	2003.93 -5%	1683.07 -20%	3576.86 70%	945 -55%	1775 ?(950 - 3497, n=127) -15%	2278 ?(270 - 4370, n=181, last 2 years) 9%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1981.23	1596.2 -19%	1119.11 -44%	3565.14 80%	837.4 -58%	1247 ?(166.8 - 2674, n=127) -37%	1971 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=181, last 2 years) -1%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	266.38	263.22 -1%	249.83 -6%	324.76 22%	184 -31%	290 ?(173.5 - 543, n=127) 9%	317 ?(47.6 - 614, n=181, last 2 years) 19%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	251.83	325.75 29%	149.04 -41%	112.05 -56%	326.1 29%	319 ?(62.6 - 548, n=128) 27%	362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=181, last 2 years) 44%

排放：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 在负载下仅有轻微的性能下降

温度

持续负载下的机身表面温度明显升高，但并未达到需要担忧的程度。我们测得的峰值温度略低于 45 °C。在 3DMark 压力测试中，Redmi Note 17 Pro 几乎没有降频。

Max. Load

Idle


44.3 °C	44 °C	43 °C
44.7 °C	43.7 °C	42.2 °C
43.7 °C	42.6 °C	40.5 °C

Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 43.2 °C


42.6 °C	44.1 °C	44.4 °C
42.1 °C	44.4 °C	44.4 °C
41.1 °C	43.5 °C	41.8 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 43.2 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90.3 % -9%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.4 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (4a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93.4 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 %
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.4 % -19%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø4.6 (4.26-4.64) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.01 (6-6.03) %

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.5 (17.4-17.5) %

扬声器

立体声扬声器的低音较弱，但在这一价位段尚可接受。在粉红噪声测试中，中频有所提升，高频也相当均衡。

此外，还可以通过 USB 或蓝牙无线连接耳机。支持的编解码器种类也较为丰富。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

电池续航：配备硅碳电池并支持快充的平价 Android 智能手机

功耗

Redmi Note 17 Pro 的一大特色是其容量高达 8,340 mAh 的电池，可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 67 瓦的功率充电。在我们使用 Xiaomi 2500 移动电源进行的测试中，充满电约需 65 分钟。这款 Xiaomi 中端智能手机不支持无线充电。

Redmi Note 17 Pro 的功耗表现中规中矩，不过其 2 瓦的待机功耗仍有改进空间。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.17 / 0.31 Watt
Idle	1.27 / 1.98 / 2.3 Watt
Load	4.62 / 8.73 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 8340 mAh	Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		9%	-7%	11%	15%	0%	2%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.27	0.97 24%	0.71 44%	0.97 24%	1.2 6%	1.27 ?(n=1) -0%	0.901 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.98	2.07 -5%	1.94 2%	1.19 40%	1.5 24%	1.98 ?(n=1) -0%	1.483 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.3	2.13 7%	2.04 11%	1.28 44%	1.9 17%	2.3 ?(n=1) -0%	1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.62		6.19 -34%	5.99 -30%	4 13%	4.62 ?(n=1) -0%	6.82 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=89, last 2 years) -48%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	8.73		13.67 -57%	10.53 -21%	7.4 15%	8.73 ?(n=1) -0%	10.8 ?(4.75 - 22, n=89, last 2 years) -24%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.14 (1.197-8.59) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.489-7.14) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.089 (1.019-1.482) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86) Watt

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.17 (3.89-5.18) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.98 (4.04-5.46) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.089 (1.019-1.482) Watt

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86) Watt

电池续航时间

在我们的 Wi-Fi 网页浏览续航测试中，这款 Redmi 手机实现了近 30 小时的出色续航表现。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 151)		29h 9min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 8340 mAh	29.2 h
Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh	18 h
Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh	14.9 h
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	19.4 h
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	30.5 h

Notebookcheck 总体评价

凭借其耐用性、明亮的 OLED 屏幕和出色的续航表现，Redmi Note 17 Pro 肯定会赢得一批粉丝。然而，性能和相机画质方面的明显短板，让我们无法在中端价位推荐这款 Xiaomi 手机。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G - 10/02/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

43 / 69 → 62%

Weight

88 / 50-100 → 75%

Battery

95%

Display

90%

Games Performance

12 / 55 → 21%

Application Performance

62 / 85 → 73%

AI Performance

10%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

67%

Average

64%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
93.6%

Repairability
52%

Software Updates
78%

Total Sustainability Score: 53.9%

可能的替代方案对比

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 76.7%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	List Price: 480€	223 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI OLED
2. 78.6%	Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	List Price: 429€	204.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.78" 2720x1224 440 PPI AMOLED
3. 81.5%	Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	List Price: 589€	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED
4. 83.8%	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: $349.99 List Price: 400€	202 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED
5. 77.6%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2	List Price: 400€	210 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

这块 OLED 屏幕让 Galaxy A57 黯然失色：Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 评测

高性能阻尼器。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 评测结论

Pros

Cons

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 的价格和上市情况

Table of Contents

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 规格参数

机身：坚固耐用的 Xiaomi 智能手机，具备 IP 防护等级并采用 Gorilla Glass Victus 2

尺寸对比

特性：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 不支持 USB 3.1，但配备红外发射器

软件：价格实惠且享有长期更新支持的中端智能手机

可持续性

通信与 GNSS：不支持 WiFi 7、采用单频 GPS 的 Xiaomi 智能手机

通话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 支持双 SIM 卡和 eSIM

摄像头：配备光学防抖和 5000 万像素摄像头的中端智能手机

配件与保修：不附带充电器的中端智能手机

输入设备与操作：配备光学指纹传感器的平价 Android 手机

显示屏：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G OLED 屏幕支持 DC 调光和 PWM 调光

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能：Xiaomi 智能手机采用 Snapdragon 芯片组，配备最高 8 GB RAM

排放：Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G 在负载下仅有轻微的性能下降

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis

电池续航：配备硅碳电池并支持快充的平价 Android 智能手机

功耗

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 总体评价

可能的替代方案对比

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles