关于 Nothing Phone (4b) 的结论
Phone (4b) 是 Nothing 智能手机产品线中最实惠的入门级机型，同时也采用了该公司标志性的设计语言。我们从 Phone (4a) 及其他机型中已经熟悉的 Glyph Bar，在此也以更小巧的形态呈现。
大尺寸 AMOLED 显示屏是该机的核心亮点，但在我们的测试测量中，其亮度并未达到宣传的 2,000 尼特；实际上，最高亮度仅为 1,160 cd/m²，远低于该数值。这种峰值亮度很可能仅适用于非常小的白色区域，因此其实际效益微乎其微。
Nothing Phone (4b) 的双摄系统配备了一枚尺寸较小的主传感器，在低光和逆光环境下很快就会达到其性能极限，不过至少它具备光学防抖（OIS）功能。该机型未配备长焦镜头。
Nothing手机在德国仅提供128 GB内置存储版本，我们认为这有些局促，尤其是它还不支持microSD卡。其扬声器的音量水平略低于(4a)机型，但在直接对比时仍能清晰听到。
总体而言，Phone (4b) 最大的竞争对手来自其自身产品线，因为在测试时，部分零售商处存储配置相同的 Phone (4a) 实际上比 (4b) 更便宜。不过，Phone (4b) 在一个方面明显更胜一筹，那就是电池续航。 Nothing成功地从这块5,200 mAh电池中榨取了惊人的续航时间，而且电池支持1,400次充放电循环，耐用性也相对较高。遗憾的是，容量更大的6,000 mAh电池仅面向印度市场供应。
目前，Nothing Phone (4b) 最大的取舍在于其价格；如果价格能稍降一些，它无疑会成为一款极具吸引力的替代选择。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
Nothing Phone (4b) 可直接从制造商的在线商店购买，售价为 329 欧元（约合 380 美元）。
- $550.11Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone, 5G Unlocked Phones 256GB, Android 15, Snapdragon 8s Gen4, AI Mobile Phones with Four 50MP Cameras & AMOLED Display, 5150mAh, Glyph Interface, Smartphone Black
- $429.00Nothing Phone (2) 5G Unlocked Smartphone 256GB + 12GB RAM, Dark Grey
- $654.78Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone, 5G Unlocked Phones 512GB, Android 15, Snapdragon 8s Gen4, AI Mobile Phones with Four 50MP Cameras & AMOLED Display, 5150mAh, Glyph Interface, Smartphone Black
规格：Nothing Phone (4b)
设计与功能——Nothing Phone (4b) 不具备防水功能
从外观上看，Nothing Phone (4b) 完全由塑料制成，但手感依然坚固且质感上乘，做工也十分精良。Nothing 标称其厚度为 8.6 毫米；我们实测为 8.8 毫米，算上摄像头部分，厚度可达 11.65 毫米。
这款智能手机通过了 IP64 认证，这意味着它仅具备防溅水能力；不过，Nothing 还表示该机已通过“在水深 25 厘米处浸泡长达 20 分钟”的测试。鉴于其存储容量相对较小，我们原本希望它能支持 microSD 卡。
沟通与易用性——Nothing Phone 的 Wi-Fi 速度慢
在该价位段，蓝牙 6.0 尚未成为标准配置。另一方面，Nothing 并未在 Phone (4b) 中配备强大的天线系统，因此虽然 Wi-Fi 连接稳定，但速度并不特别快。
将手机贴近耳朵通话时，通话质量良好，双方都能清晰听清对方。不过，背景噪音的过滤效果并不理想。此外，该机型不支持 eSIM。
| Networking | |
| Nothing Phone (4b) | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——两枚不带光学防抖（OIS）的镜头
在我们的测试中，Nothing Phone (4b) 的前置摄像头在光线充足的情况下能拍出相当不错的照片。
后置主摄像头的成像效果与同级别产品相当，在屏幕上看起来非常赏心悦目，不过亮部区域往往会出现过曝现象。超广角摄像头是一大亮点，但其成像质量并不特别出色。变焦功能仅支持数字变焦，因此画质相应较差。
| 宽高比 | 解决方案 | |
|---|---|---|
| 照片 | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | 12 / 50 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 | 全高清（30/60 FPS）超高清（30 FPS） |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 | 全高清（30 / 60 FPS） |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏 - 手机 (4b)，亮度最高可达 2,000 尼特
Nothing Phone (4b) 的大屏幕理论上最高亮度可达 2,000 cd/m²，但在我们的测试中，它并未达到这一峰值亮度。在晴朗的户外环境下，这一点尤为明显，因为屏幕内容有时会难以辨认。
PWM 调光频率为 480 Hz。虽然这对大多数人来说通常无害，但对于对此敏感的人来说可能会造成不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1148 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6856 K
| Nothing Phone (4b) Super AMOLED, 2344x1080, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G77 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 65% | 232% | 174% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1160 | 1839 59% | 3521 204% | 2841 145% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1030 | 1752 70% | 3704 260% | 3117 203% |
| Response Times | -23% | -4% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.95 ? | 1.57 ? -65% | 1.6 ? -68% | 1.09 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.28 ? | 1.39 ? -9% | 1.1 ? 14% | 1.13 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 | 240 | 103 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 17.34 | 16.58 4% | 10 42% | 14.64 16% |
| Screen | -14% | 49% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1148 | 1127 -2% | 1558 36% | 1791 56% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.6 -37% | 0.79 58% | 1.5 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 5.3 -13% | 2.97 37% | 3.4 28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.7 -3% | 1.3 64% | 1 72% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.06 107% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6856 95% | 6496 100% | 6489 100% | 6587 99% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1526 | 1795 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 99 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
0% | 92% /
72% | 74% /
60% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 17.34 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7656 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下、不同亮度设置下的测量数据序列（尽管在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6045 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.678 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.46 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.491 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间
| Nothing Phone (4b) | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Motorola Moto G77 | Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 49% | -33% | -11% | -30% | 79% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 952.54 | 1986.3 109% | 522.1 -45% | 1009.1 6% | 742 ? -22% | 2277 ? 139% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 860.56 | 1732.34 101% | 494.6 -43% | 993.91 15% | 543 ? -37% | 1960 ? 128% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 253.22 | 368.9 46% | 217.2 -14% | 183.57 -28% | 195.6 ? -23% | 315 ? 24% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 293.92 | 115.25 -61% | 206.2 -30% | 187.74 -36% | 189.3 ? -36% | 361 ? 23% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4b) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (4b) | |
Nothing Phone (4b) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.11 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  1.01 / 2 / 2.09 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nothing Phone (4b) 5200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G 6500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 21% | -17% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.01 | 0.85 16% | 1.11 -10% | 1.185 ? -17% | 0.878 ? 13% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2 | 1.86 7% | 1.23 38% | 2.34 ? -17% | 1.453 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.09 | 1.94 7% | 1.34 36% | 2.43 ? -16% | 1.65 ? 21% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 3.8 | 6.84 ? | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 7.79 | 11.1 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Nothing Phone (4b) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Nothing Phone (4b) 以其设计和出色的电池续航能力给人留下深刻印象，但在显示屏、摄像头、功能和价格方面表现欠佳，尤其是考虑到来自同门产品 Phone (4a) 的强劲竞争。
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 09/15/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 对可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.5%  | Nothing Phone (4b) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 329€ | 210 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2344x1080 381 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 79%  | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 519€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
3. 76.7%  | Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 300€ | 182 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
4. 79.1%  | Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: $343.71 List Price: 400 Euro | 206 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
