Notebookcheck

Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB) 简短评测

Klaus Hinum (translated by Delta Zhang), 06/10/2017
Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Tablet Touchscreen Notebook Chinese Tech

镁合金。 不同寻常的Atom x7-Z8750,8GB内存,Android 6或Windows 10双启动项的组合,Teclast's Tbook 16 Power 在众多产品当中脱颖而出。但在我们详细的测试过程单中,我们发现了一些问题。

Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Processor
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3, 单通道?, 8-10-11-23
Display
11.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 190 PPI, 多点触控, native pen support, IPS, 无涂层, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Cherry Trail
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 18.2 GB free
Soundcard
Intel SST Audio Device
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD卡读卡器, Sensors: Kionix KXCJ9 三轴加速度计
Networking
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10 x 303 x 179.5
Battery
8500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.8 / 8500mAh 聚合物锂离子电池, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 7 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, fanless
Released
11/16/2016
Weight
897 g
Price
287 Euro

 

Dual-boot menu
The display is not laminated, and there is a gap between the glass and the panel
Small touchpad means arduous usage
The kickstand is freely adjustable
The tablet can be charged via USB-C
Some external SSDs refused to work
White noise, only fixed through reboot
After a few hours, everything went back to normal

Size Comparison

Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack
Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
78 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ
78 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
70 MB/s ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 256GB
68 MB/s ∼87% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
65.9 MB/s ∼84% -6%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
64 MB/s ∼82% -9%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
32.9 MB/s ∼42% -53%
Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519)
29 MB/s ∼37% -59%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼100% +702%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
459 MBit/s ∼92% +634%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)
357 MBit/s ∼71% +471%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Realtek RTL8723BS
62.5 MBit/s ∼12%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
40.6 MBit/s ∼8% -35%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
593 MBit/s ∼100% +978%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
588 MBit/s ∼99% +969%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)
219 MBit/s ∼37% +298%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Realtek RTL8723BS
55 MBit/s ∼9%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 MBit/s ∼7% -24%
193
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
196
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 244 cd/m² Average: 215.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 244 cd/m²
Contrast: 642:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll) 60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.15
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
1920x1080, 11.6
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Cube i9
KDC0000, , 1920x1200, 12.2
Chuwi Hi12
SEC3542, , 2160x1440, 12
Response Times
-17%
-23%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (20, 20)
48.4 (20.4, 28)
-21%
37.2 (16.4, 20.8)
7%
28 (11.6, 16.4)
30%
Response Time Black / White *
30.2 (16.8, 13.4)
35.6 (8, 27.6)
-18%
24 (9.2, 14.8)
21%
16 (5.2, 10.8)
47%
PWM Frequency
12000 (26, 60)
10420
-13%
200 (99, 255)
-98%
Screen
50%
20%
19%
Brightness
215
433
101%
263
22%
277
29%
Brightness Distribution
79
87
10%
77
-3%
89
13%
Black Level *
0.38
0.326
14%
0.28
26%
0.256
33%
Contrast
642
1340
109%
939
46%
1145
78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.7
1.82
73%
4.1
39%
5.2
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
1.44
81%
3.8
49%
8.5
-15%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.1 114%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
CCT
8867 73%
6560 99%
6433 101%
7048 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.6
62.3
3%
57.7
-5%
62
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
97.5
5%
76.2
-18%
82.5
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 31%
-2% / 8%
29% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 12000 Hz26 % brightness setting
60 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 26 % (60 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
89 Points ∼100% +129%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼99% +126%
Cube i9
Intel Core m3-6Y30
73 Points ∼82% +88%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
42 Points ∼47% +8%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼46% +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
41 Points ∼46% +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
39 Points ∼44% 0%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
38.9 Points ∼44%
Microsoft Surface 3
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
38 Points ∼43% -2%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
31 Points ∼35% -20%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
28 Points ∼31% -28%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
Intel Celeron N2910
27 Points ∼30% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09
Intel Core m3-6Y30
211 Points ∼100% +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼98% +55%
Cube i9
Intel Core m3-6Y30
192 Points ∼91% +44%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel Pentium N3710
152 Points ∼72% +14%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel Pentium N3710
150 Points ∼71% +13%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel Pentium N3710
141 Points ∼67% +6%
Microsoft Surface 3
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
134 Points ∼64% +1%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
133 (min: 112.75) Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel Pentium N3710
105 Points ∼50% -21%
Teclast Tbook 10s
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
101 Points ∼48% -24%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
99 Points ∼47% -26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
Intel Celeron N2910
97 Points ∼46% -27%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
94 Points ∼45% -29%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
85 Points ∼40% -36%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
38.9 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
10.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
133 Points
Help
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B
2976 Points ∼100% +99%
Cube i9
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 128GB O1229B
2628 Points ∼88% +75%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼82% +62%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2114 Points ∼71% +41%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
1999 Points ∼67% +33%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710
1792 Points ∼60% +20%
Microsoft Surface 3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1677 Points ∼56% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1651 Points ∼55% +10%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1499 Points ∼50%
VOYO VBook V3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1352 Points ∼45% -10%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1315 Points ∼44% -12%
Medion Akoya E2215T
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1282 Points ∼43% -14%
Teclast Tbook 10s
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1088 Points ∼37% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1499 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
1732 points
Help
Performance Rating
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
94.4 pt ∼94%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
68.2 pt ∼68%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
65.7 pt ∼66%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
22.9 pt ∼23%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
12.1 pt ∼12%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
11.3 pt ∼11%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Write 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
149.2 MB/s ∼100% +7143%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
116 MB/s ∼78% +5531%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
96.18 MB/s ∼64% +4569%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
11.2 MB/s ∼8% +444%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
2.06 MB/s ∼1%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.775 MB/s ∼1% -14%
Read 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
243.7 MB/s ∼100% +2126%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
121.3 MB/s ∼50% +1008%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
27.94 MB/s ∼11% +155%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
22.7 MB/s ∼9% +107%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
10.95 MB/s ∼4%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
7.358 MB/s ∼3% -33%
Write 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
68.02 MB/s ∼100% +3424%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
56.8 MB/s ∼84% +2843%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
51.25 MB/s ∼75% +2555%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
9.52 MB/s ∼14% +393%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.93 MB/s ∼3%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
1.504 MB/s ∼2% -22%
Read 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
30.14 MB/s ∼100% +279%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
18.4 MB/s ∼61% +131%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
14.72 MB/s ∼49% +85%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
12.64 MB/s ∼42% +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
7.96 MB/s ∼26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
6.615 MB/s ∼22% -17%
Write 512
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
199 MB/s ∼100% +648%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
158.2 MB/s ∼79% +495%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
130.7 MB/s ∼66% +391%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
39.9 MB/s ∼20% +50%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
26.61 MB/s ∼13%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
9.096 MB/s ∼5% -66%
Read 512
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
313.1 MB/s ∼100% +328%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
252.4 MB/s ∼81% +245%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
197 MB/s ∼63% +169%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
133.7 MB/s ∼43% +83%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
78.07 MB/s ∼25% +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
73.22 MB/s ∼23%
Write Seq
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
208 MB/s ∼100% +646%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
158.2 MB/s ∼76% +467%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
157 MB/s ∼75% +463%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s ∼23% +72%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
40.52 MB/s ∼19% +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
27.9 MB/s ∼13%
Read Seq
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
662.5 MB/s ∼100% +786%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
FORESEE 64GB O1229B
433.2 MB/s ∼65% +479%
Cube i9
FORESEE 128GB O1229B
337 MB/s ∼51% +351%
Microsoft Surface 3
128 GB eMMC Flash
149.3 MB/s ∼23% +100%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602
64 GB eMMC Flash
86.39 MB/s ∼13% +15%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
64 GB eMMC Flash
74.8 MB/s ∼11%
64 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 74.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 27.9 MB/s
512K Read: 73.22 MB/s
512K Write: 26.61 MB/s
4K Read: 7.96 MB/s
4K Write: 1.93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 10.95 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 2.06 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
1413 Points ∼100% +246%
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
899 Points ∼64% +120%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
496 Points ∼35% +22%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
489 Points ∼35% +20%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
473 Points ∼33% +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
463 Points ∼33% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
418 Points ∼30% +2%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
408 Points ∼29%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
382 Points ∼27% -6%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
298 Points ∼21% -27%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
1022 Points ∼100%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
278 Points ∼27%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
231 Points ∼23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR
NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700
6636 Points ∼100% +276%
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5602 Points ∼84% +217%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
2831 Points ∼43% +60%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
2455 Points ∼37% +39%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
2329 Points ∼35% +32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
1907 Points ∼29% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
1897 Points ∼29% +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
1767 Points ∼27%
3DMark 06 Standard
2274 points
3DMark 11 Performance
451 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1743 points
Help
Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
48 (min: 42) fps ∼100% +173%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
31.3 fps ∼65% +78%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
22.6 (min: 21) fps ∼47% +28%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
17.6 (min: 16) fps ∼37%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
50.4 (min: 43) fps ∼100% +128%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
35.2 fps ∼70% +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
22.1 (min: 19) fps ∼44%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
20 (min: 18) fps ∼40% -10%
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
Cube i9
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
32 (min: 13) fps ∼100% +113%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710
21.8 fps ∼68% +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750
15 (min: 4) fps ∼47%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
13.9 (min: 7) fps ∼43% -7%
low med. high ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 22.113.7fps
World of Warships (2015) 15fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 17.6fps
Rocket League (2017) 18.7fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 19.6fps
Max. Load
 41 °C32 °C27 °C 
 43 °C32 °C27 °C 
 41 °C33 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 34 °C
28 °C32 °C35 °C
29 °C33 °C40 °C
29 °C33 °C38 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 33 °C
Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203735.52533.231.53130.831.94033.137.75031.732.56328.330.78028.527.410026.826.61252526.416025.22620023.82825022.332.831522.428.940021.925.850020.141.363020.151.18001955.9100018.662.5125018.462.6160017.958.5200017.452.1250017.454.6315017.455.7400017.461.5500017.563.5630017.557800017.642.41000017.537.41250017.537.71600017.529.3SPL30.570.6N1.523.4median 18.4Teclast Tbook 16 Powermedian 42.4Delta2.514.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Teclast Tbook 16 Power audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 13.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (26.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (53.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.215 / 2.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.7 Watt
Load midlight 12.7 / 13.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Chuwi Hi12
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Cube i7 Book CDK09
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 64GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6
Cube i9
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 128GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2
Microsoft Surface 3
Z8700, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.8
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Power Consumption
21%
-180%
-132%
-70%
-100%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
1.7
35%
6.6
-154%
4.6
-77%
2.5
4%
4.1
-58%
Idle Average *
2.7
1.7
37%
10
-270%
9.6
-256%
7
-159%
8.3
-207%
Idle Maximum *
2.7
3.3
-22%
12
-344%
9.6
-256%
8.4
-211%
8.6
-219%
Load Average *
12.7
7.9
38%
21.1
-66%
18.6
-46%
11.2
12%
13.5
-6%
Load Maximum *
13.1
10.8
18%
22
-68%
16.3
-24%
12.4
5%
14.5
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 06min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
661 min ∼100% +76%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
533 min ∼81% +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
488 min ∼74% +30%
Chuwi Vi10 Ultimate 64GB
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
435 min ∼66% +16%
Chuwi Hi12
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
405 min ∼61% +8%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
376 min ∼57%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
364 min ∼55% -3%
Cube i7 Book CDK09
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
300 min ∼45% -20%
Cube i9
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
262 min ∼40% -30%
Teclast Tbook 10s
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
228 min ∼34% -39%

Pros

+ 高制造质量
+ 无声冷却系统
+ USB-C PD供电及DisplayPort显示输出

Cons

- 链接USB或USB-C外置设备时出现一些问题
- 高待机功耗
- 无充电器
- 低速eMMC 存储
- 触摸板过小
TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks
TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks

Teclast Tbook 16 Power最大的卖点在于它高速的Atom x7处理器。尽管它的性能比Atom x5强,它依旧比竞品所搭载的Core m8和奔腾 N3701 处理器慢太多。特别是在游戏性能上,英特尔 HD Graphics 405令我们十分失望。

其另外一个主要卖点在于预装有Android 6操作系统。在一个很短的时间里我们的确是能够使用它的,它表现很出色而且看起来也很顺滑。但不幸的是,再一次 Windows更新之后,双启动项的选项消失了,我们因此无法对它进行进一步测试。

总体上来说,我们在对于测试样机的测试过程中,遭遇到了很多的或大或小的问题。一天早晨,屏幕无法显示除了白噪之外的任何东西,我们被迫重启了设备。因为一些原因,之后的几个小时内,屏幕的边缘部分亮度比其余部分更亮。充电器的确实带来了更多的大问题。无论是苹果的,Inateck或是Anker的USB-C充电器都无法对它很好的充电。有的时候,它完全无法充电,有时,它的充电断断续续,而且当它充完电之后,有时它会失去和充电器的链接。

自带的USB接口的工作情况不如预期,我们无法使用外置固态硬盘,例如G-Drive,Angelbird,或是OCZ的产品。其他的设备,例如外置机械硬盘或闪迪Extreme 900,运行的很正常。我们猜测是USB的接口供电不足。待机也是这台设备的一大问题。初来较高的待机功耗之外,它有时在屏幕关闭的状态下依旧维持运行状态,而一些后台进程导致CPU负载较高使得电池很快被消耗殆尽。我们无法找到这个问题的确切原因。我们最好的猜测是其驱动程序出错或不佳。

除了上述的问题之外,这台平板依旧还有其他的几个显而易见的问题:摄像头,扬声器,以及触摸板。再者。因为缺乏CE认证,这台设备现在无法在欧洲被买到,在撰写文章的时间点上,唯一买到它的方法是从中国进口。保修和支持服务因此完全取决于卖家,且伴有高昂的税费和运费。

但是,它也有一些优点。尽管不合适在户外使用,它的屏幕也不算是太烂。外壳的坚固程度是极为出色的,并且有着很好的触感。我们喜欢完全静音的系统(无风扇,无高频啸叫),且其MicroSD读卡器速度相对来说比较快。

我们通过Gearbest从中国直接获得了我们的评测样机,它的售价约为310美元。若需要键盘扩展坞则需要再加35美元,若不考虑它的缺点,是很值得推荐的。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Teclast Tbook 16 Power - 05/15/2017 v6
Klaus Hinum

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
40 / 80 → 50%
Weight
77 / 78 → 97%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
35 / 68 → 52%
Application Performance
41 / 87 → 47%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
38 / 91 → 41%
Camera
26 / 85 → 31%
Add Points
-1%
Average
61%
79%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB) 简短评测
Klaus Hinum, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2017-06-10)