Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB) 简短评测

Name: Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Brand: Teclast

镁合金。 不同寻常的Atom x7-Z8750，8GB内存，Android 6或Windows 10双启动项的组合，Teclast's Tbook 16 Power 在众多产品当中脱颖而出。但在我们详细的测试过程单中，我们发现了一些问题。

Klaus Hinum, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 06/10/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Tablet Touchscreen Laptop / Notebook Chinese Tech

Test device courtesy of Gearbest

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast Tbook 16 Power (Tbook Series)

Processor

Intel Atom x7-Z8750 4 x 1.6 - 2.6 GHz, Cherry Trail

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR3, 单通道?, 8-10-11-23

Display

11.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 190 PPI, 多点触控, native pen support, IPS, 无涂层, glossy: yes, detachable screen

Mainboard

Intel Cherry Trail

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 18.2 GB free

Soundcard

Intel SST Audio Device

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD卡读卡器, Sensors: Kionix KXCJ9 三轴加速度计

Networking

Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10 x 303 x 179.5

Battery

8500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.8 / 8500mAh 聚合物锂离子电池, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 7 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, fanless

Released

11/16/2016

Weight

897 g

Price

287 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

The display is not laminated, and there is a gap between the glass and the panel

After a few hours, everything went back to normal

Size Comparison

Cube i9 CDK07 Docking Keyboard Teclast Tbook 16 Power Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Cube i7 Book CDK09 Microsoft Surface 3 DIN A4 ❌

Left to right: MicroSD (behind flap), mini-HDMI, Power, USB-C (3.0), USB-A (3.0), audio jack

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10	78 MB/s +11%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ	78 MB/s +11%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power	70 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 256GB	68 MB/s -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100	65.9 MB/s -6%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	64 MB/s -9%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA	32.9 MB/s -53%
Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519)	29 MB/s -59%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	593 MBit/s +978%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	588 MBit/s +969%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)	219 MBit/s +298%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Realtek RTL8723BS	55 MBit/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	41.6 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	501 MBit/s +702%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	459 MBit/s +634%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Klaus I211)	357 MBit/s +471%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Realtek RTL8723BS	62.5 MBit/s
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	40.6 MBit/s -35%


193 cd/m²	210 cd/m²	196 cd/m²
222 cd/m²	244 cd/m²	208 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	206 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 244 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 215.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 244 cd/m²
Contrast: 642:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Teclast Tbook 16 Power 1920x1080, 11.60	Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.30	Cube i9 KDC0000, , 1920x1200, 12.20	Chuwi Hi12 SEC3542, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display		3%	-3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66.1	66.9 1%	65.7 -1%	66 0%
sRGB Coverage	93.2	97.5 5%	88.7 -5%	95.3 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.4	68.6 2%	65.1 -3%	68.1 1%
Response Times		-17%	-23%	39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(20, 20)	48.4 ?(20.4, 28) -21%	37.2 ?(16.4, 20.8) 7%	28 ?(11.6, 16.4) 30%
Response Time Black / White *	30.2 ?(16.8, 13.4)	35.6 ?(8, 27.6) -18%	24 ?(9.2, 14.8) 21%	16 ?(5.2, 10.8) 47%
PWM Frequency	12000 ?(26, 60)	10420 -13%	200 ?(99, 255) -98%
Screen		53%	16%	17%
Brightness middle	244	436.7 79%	263 8%	293 20%
Brightness	215	433 101%	263 22%	277 29%
Brightness Distribution	79	87 10%	77 -3%	89 13%
Black Level *	0.38	0.326 14%	0.28 26%	0.256 33%
Contrast	642	1340 109%	939 46%	1145 78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.7	1.82 73%	4.1 39%	5.2 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.7		12.1 -3%	11.4 3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	1.44 81%	3.8 49%	8.5 -15%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.1 ^105%	2.25 ^98%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	8867 ^73%	6560 ^99%	6433 ^101%	7048 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60.6	62.3 3%	57.7 -5%	62 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	97.5 5%	76.2 -18%	82.5 -11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		13% / 29%	-3% / 5%	19% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.8 ms rise
30.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

12000 Hz

≤ 26 % brightness setting

≤ 60 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 26 % (60 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	89 Points +129%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +126%
Cube i9 Intel Core m3-6Y30	73 Points +88%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	42 Points +8%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel Pentium N3710	41 Points +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	41 Points +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	39 Points 0%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel Atom x7-Z8750	38.9 Points
Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700	38 Points -2%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	31 Points -20%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	28 Points -28%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 Intel Celeron N2910	27 Points -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	211 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +55%
Cube i9 Intel Core m3-6Y30	192 Points +44%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	152 Points +14%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	150 Points +13%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel Pentium N3710	141 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700	134 Points +1%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel Atom x7-Z8750	133 (112.75^min - 133^max) Points
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	105 Points -21%
Teclast Tbook 10s Intel Atom x5-Z8350	101 Points -24%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	99 Points -26%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 Intel Celeron N2910	97 Points -27%
VOYO VBook V3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points -29%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro Intel Atom x5-Z8300	85 Points -36%

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

8.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

1.75 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

0.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

38.9 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

10.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

133 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B	2976 Points +99%
Cube i9 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 128GB O1229B	2628 Points +75%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points +62%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2114 Points +41%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256	1999 Points +33%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	1792 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface 3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1677 Points +12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1651 Points +10%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1499 Points
VOYO VBook V3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1352 Points -10%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1315 Points -12%
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1282 Points -14%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1088 Points -27%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1499 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		1732 points
PCMark 10 Score		1006 points
Help

Performance Rating | CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	94.4 pt
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	68.2 pt
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	65.7 pt
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	22.9 pt
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	12.1 pt
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	11.3 pt

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Read Seq
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	663 MB/s +786%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	433.2 MB/s +479%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	337 MB/s +351%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	149.3 MB/s +100%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	86.4 MB/s +16%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	74.8 MB/s
Write Seq
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	208 MB/s +646%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	158.2 MB/s +467%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	157 MB/s +463%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s +72%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	40.52 MB/s +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	27.9 MB/s
Read 512
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	313.1 MB/s +328%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	252.4 MB/s +245%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	197 MB/s +169%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	133.7 MB/s +83%
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	78.1 MB/s +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	73.2 MB/s
Write 512
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	199 MB/s +648%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	158.2 MB/s +495%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	130.7 MB/s +391%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	39.9 MB/s +50%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	26.61 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.096 MB/s -66%
Read 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	30.14 MB/s +279%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	18.4 MB/s +131%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	14.72 MB/s +85%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	12.64 MB/s +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.96 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.615 MB/s -17%
Write 4k
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	68 MB/s +3423%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	56.8 MB/s +2843%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	51.3 MB/s +2558%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.52 MB/s +393%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.93 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.504 MB/s -22%
Read 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	243.7 MB/s +2126%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	121.3 MB/s +1008%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	27.94 MB/s +155%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	22.7 MB/s +107%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	10.95 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.358 MB/s -33%
Write 4k QD32
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	149.2 MB/s +7143%
Cube i9 FORESEE 128GB O1229B	116 MB/s +5531%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 FORESEE 64GB O1229B	96.2 MB/s +4570%
Microsoft Surface 3 128 GB eMMC Flash	11.2 MB/s +444%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.06 MB/s
Medion Akoya P2211T MD98602 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.775 MB/s -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

64 GB eMMC Flash

Sequential Read: 74.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 27.9 MB/s

512K Read: 73.2 MB/s

512K Write: 26.61 MB/s

4K Read: 7.96 MB/s

4K Write: 1.93 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 10.95 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 2.06 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	1413 Points +246%
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	899 Points +120%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	496 Points +22%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	489 Points +20%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	473 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	463 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550	418 Points +2%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	408 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	382 Points -6%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	298 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	6636 Points +276%
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	5602 Points +217%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	2831 Points +60%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550	2455 Points +39%
Chiligreen Mobilitas SF2600 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	2329 Points +32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	1907 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	1897 Points +7%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	1767 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire ES1-731G-P5UR NVIDIA GeForce 910M, Intel Pentium N3700	1022 Points
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	278 Points
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	231 Points

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 06 Standard Score		2274 points
3DMark 11 Performance		451 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		1743 points
Help

... in comparison

Dota 2 Reborn | World of Warships | Farming Simulator 17

Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	48 (42.2^min) fps +117%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	35.2 fps +59%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	22.1 (19^min) fps
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	20 (18^min) fps -10%

World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	32 (13^min - 48^max) fps +113%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	21.8 fps +45%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	15 (4^min - 25^max) fps
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	13.9 (7^min - 19^max) fps -7%

Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Cube i9 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	48 (42^min - 60^max) fps +173%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	31.3 fps +78%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	22.6 (21^min - 27^max) fps +28%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Atom x7-Z8750	17.6 (16^min - 23^max) fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	22.1	13.7
World of Warships (2015)	15
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	17.6
Rocket League (2017)	18.7
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	19.6
Battle Bay (2018)			37
World of Tanks Blitz (2018)	37		24
Arena of Valor (2018)	25
Shadow Fight 3 (2018)	30
PUBG Mobile (2018)	0 game wont start (Hangs after a few minutes)
League of Legends (2019)	23.6	18	13.9
Hearthstone (2020)	17.8	18	9.91

Max. Load

Idle


41 °C	32 °C	27 °C
43 °C	32 °C	27 °C
41 °C	33 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 34 °C


28 °C	32 °C	35 °C
29 °C	33 °C	40 °C
29 °C	33 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 33 °C

Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.9 °C / -23.2 F).

Teclast Tbook 16 Power audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 13.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (26.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (56.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.215 / 2.2 Watt
Idle	2.6 / 2.7 / 2.7 Watt
Load	12.7 / 13.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Teclast Tbook 16 Power Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.60	Chuwi Hi12 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00	Cube i7 Book CDK09 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 64GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.60	Cube i9 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, FORESEE 128GB O1229B, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.20	Microsoft Surface 3 Z8700, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.80	Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00
Power Consumption		21%	-180%	-132%	-70%	-100%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	1.7 35%	6.6 -154%	4.6 -77%	2.5 4%	4.1 -58%
Idle Average *	2.7	1.7 37%	10 -270%	9.6 -256%	7 -159%	8.3 -207%
Idle Maximum *	2.7	3.3 -22%	12 -344%	9.6 -256%	8.4 -211%	8.6 -219%
Load Average *	12.7	7.9 38%	21.1 -66%	18.6 -46%	11.2 12%	13.5 -6%
Load Maximum *	13.1	10.8 18%	22 -68%	16.3 -24%	12.4 5%	14.5 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 06min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)	661 min +76%
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	533 min +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	488 min +30%
Chuwi Vi10 Ultimate 64GB Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	435 min +16%
Chuwi Hi12 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	405 min +8%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power Z8750, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)	376 min
Chuwi Hi10 Pro Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	364 min -3%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	300 min -20%
Cube i9 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	262 min -30%
Teclast Tbook 10s Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	228 min -39%

Pros

+ 高制造质量

+ 无声冷却系统

+ USB-C PD供电及DisplayPort显示输出

Cons

- 链接USB或USB-C外置设备时出现一些问题

- 高待机功耗

- 无充电器

- 低速eMMC 存储

- 触摸板过小

TBook 16 Power, affordable 2-in-1 convertible with some drawbacks

Teclast Tbook 16 Power最大的卖点在于它高速的Atom x7处理器。尽管它的性能比Atom x5强，它依旧比竞品所搭载的Core m8和奔腾 N3701 处理器慢太多。特别是在游戏性能上，英特尔 HD Graphics 405令我们十分失望。

其另外一个主要卖点在于预装有Android 6操作系统。在一个很短的时间里我们的确是能够使用它的，它表现很出色而且看起来也很顺滑。但不幸的是，再一次 Windows更新之后，双启动项的选项消失了，我们因此无法对它进行进一步测试。

总体上来说，我们在对于测试样机的测试过程中，遭遇到了很多的或大或小的问题。一天早晨，屏幕无法显示除了白噪之外的任何东西，我们被迫重启了设备。因为一些原因，之后的几个小时内，屏幕的边缘部分亮度比其余部分更亮。充电器的确实带来了更多的大问题。无论是苹果的，Inateck或是Anker的USB-C充电器都无法对它很好的充电。有的时候，它完全无法充电，有时，它的充电断断续续，而且当它充完电之后，有时它会失去和充电器的链接。

自带的USB接口的工作情况不如预期，我们无法使用外置固态硬盘，例如G-Drive，Angelbird，或是OCZ的产品。其他的设备，例如外置机械硬盘或闪迪Extreme 900，运行的很正常。我们猜测是USB的接口供电不足。待机也是这台设备的一大问题。初来较高的待机功耗之外，它有时在屏幕关闭的状态下依旧维持运行状态，而一些后台进程导致CPU负载较高使得电池很快被消耗殆尽。我们无法找到这个问题的确切原因。我们最好的猜测是其驱动程序出错或不佳。

除了上述的问题之外，这台平板依旧还有其他的几个显而易见的问题：摄像头，扬声器，以及触摸板。再者。因为缺乏CE认证，这台设备现在无法在欧洲被买到，在撰写文章的时间点上，唯一买到它的方法是从中国进口。保修和支持服务因此完全取决于卖家，且伴有高昂的税费和运费。

但是，它也有一些优点。尽管不合适在户外使用，它的屏幕也不算是太烂。外壳的坚固程度是极为出色的，并且有着很好的触感。我们喜欢完全静音的系统（无风扇，无高频啸叫），且其MicroSD读卡器速度相对来说比较快。

我们通过Gearbest从中国直接获得了我们的评测样机，它的售价约为310美元。若需要键盘扩展坞则需要再加35美元，若不考虑它的缺点，是很值得推荐的。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Teclast Tbook 16 Power - 2017-05-15 05/15/2017 v6^(old)
Klaus Hinum

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

40 / 80 → 50%

Weight

77 / 35-78 → 97%

Battery

89%

Display

78%

Games Performance

35 / 68 → 52%

Application Performance

41 / 87 → 47%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

38 / 91 → 41%

Camera

26 / 85 → 31%

Add Points

-1%

Average

61%

79%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast Tbook 16 Power 2-in-1 (x7-Z8750, 8 GB) 简短评测

Klaus Hinum, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2017-06-10)