Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 变形本简短评测

创作者的绘图板。 你对平板手写笔输入不满意吗?联想为创作者们带来了一个更方便的设备:既可以用笔在纸上书写绘画也可以用电子手写输入,任你选择。这台10毫米厚的Book不是一个全能型设备,但能力也绝不限于手写输入。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解更多。
Windows Touchscreen Tablet Convertible / 2-in-1 Business
Yoga Book Windows YB1-X91L 64GB, LTE (Yoga Book Series)
Processor
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 4 x 1.4 - 2.4 GHz, Cherry Trail, Cherryview
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Core: 600 MHz, Memory: 800 MHz, 128位, 20.19.15.4424 WHQL
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3 双通道
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1080 pixel 218 PPI, 主屏幕: 电容式触控屏幕支持AnyPen技术 / CreativePad: 电容式触控屏幕和EMR手写技术, native pen support, nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller, IPS , 电容式触控屏幕支持AnyPen技术, 色彩: 1670万, 色域覆盖: 70%, 亮度: 400 nits , glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cherry Trail
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 三星 CWBD3R 64 GB eMMC闪存, 37.5 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC282 @ Intel Cherry Trail / Braswell SoC - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米, Card Reader: micro-SD, 最高支持 128 G, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 振动,重力感应器,霍尔感应器,GPS, Micro HDMI, micro-USB, nano-SIM卡
Networking
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.6 x 256.6 x 170.8
Battery
32 Wh, 8500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 待机电池续航: 生产上称超过70天, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 13 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 双相机
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 自动对焦
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 定焦
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 键盘+触控板,第二块屏幕的创意手写版, Keyboard Light: yes, 配有不同笔头的手写笔,磁感应绘图板, Office Mobile: Excel, PowerPoint, Word, OneNote, ArtRage (Lite试用版), 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
695 g, Power Supply: 87 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Mini-watchband hinges; 130 mechanical parts ensure a strong joint.
Mini-watchband hinges; 130 mechanical parts ensure a strong joint.
Micro-USB 2.0, micro-HDMI
Micro-USB 2.0, micro-HDMI
Power button, volume, headphone
Power button, volume, headphone
SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
534 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
453 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps) (jseb)
496 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps) (jseb)
455 MBit/s ∼100%
388
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 388 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 314 cd/m²
Contrast: 1032:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.61 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
Gamma: 2.43
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller, , 1920x1080, 10.10
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.30
Dell Latitude 11 5175
YJ0MP-TV108FM, , 1920x1080, 10.80
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.10
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display
Display P3 Coverage
67.5
63.4
53.8
65.8
sRGB Coverage
96.6
81.1
73.7
96.2
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69
59.3
53.8
66.8
Response Times
-22%
-12%
12%
34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(18, 18)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8)
-28%
46 ?(19, 27)
-28%
33.2 ?(15.2, 18)
8%
25 ?(9, 16)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(6, 21)
31 ?(6, 25.2)
-15%
26 ?(7.2, 18.8)
4%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
16%
17 ?(4, 13)
37%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(50)
200
Screen
12%
-1%
-27%
-53%
Brightness middle
382
389.2
2%
462
21%
322
-16%
451
18%
Brightness
363
392
8%
449
24%
319
-12%
425
17%
Brightness Distribution
83
92
11%
86
4%
97
17%
80
-4%
Black Level *
0.37
0.27
27%
0.45
-22%
0.42
-14%
0.37
-0%
Contrast
1032
1441
40%
1027
0%
767
-26%
1219
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.61
3.61
-0%
4.4
-22%
6.02
-67%
11.04
-206%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.92
9.21
-16%
10.06
-27%
14.92
-88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.77
3.8
-1%
3.49
7%
6.29
-67%
10.45
-177%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.16 102%
2.55 86%
2.4 92%
2 110%
CCT
6760 96%
5969 109%
6256 104%
7712 84%
8849 73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
53.21
47.8
74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
80.76
73.2
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / 5%
-7% / -3%
-8% / -19%
-10% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21817 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

System info CPU-Z CPU
System info CPU-Z Motherboard
System info CPU-Z Memory
System info CPU-Z Cache
System info HWinfo Summary
System info GPU-Z
Latency Monitor - Error found
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points ∼38% +208%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
107 Points ∼37% +197%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Intel Core m5-6Y57
95 Points ∼33% +164%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼30% +144%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8550
36 Points ∼12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points ∼3% +90%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
232 Points ∼2% +73%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼2% +54%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Intel Core m5-6Y57
171 Points ∼2% +28%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8550
134 Points ∼1%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
36 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.98 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points ∼45% +130%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2717 Points ∼41% +110%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2641 Points ∼40% +104%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼36% +87%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1296 Points ∼19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points ∼55% +215%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3720 Points ∼52% +198%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points ∼45% +155%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2721 Points ∼38% +118%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1247 Points ∼18%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1296 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1247 points
Help
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
64 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
466%
620%
715%
667%
Read Seq
120.5
663
450%
472.6
292%
501
316%
512
325%
Write Seq
34.39
158.2
360%
296.8
763%
297.2
764%
462.1
1244%
Read 512
102.6
313.1
205%
383.8
274%
351.7
243%
376
266%
Write 512
26.58
158.2
495%
296.8
1017%
295.7
1012%
295.2
1011%
Read 4k
13.34
30.14
126%
30.89
132%
28.31
112%
31.83
139%
Write 4k
11.56
68
488%
71.4
518%
90.3
681%
64.5
458%
Read 4k QD32
33.6
243.7
625%
243.9
626%
285
748%
269.6
702%
Write 4k QD32
13.79
149.2
982%
198.6
1340%
268.4
1846%
178.2
1192%
64 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 120.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 34.39 MB/s
512K Read: 102.6 MB/s
512K Write: 26.58 MB/s
4K Read: 13.34 MB/s
4K Write: 11.56 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 33.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 13.79 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1206 Points ∼2% +189%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1200 Points ∼2% +187%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57
863 Points ∼1% +106%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
781 Points ∼1% +87%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
418 Points ∼1%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6597 Points ∼3% +169%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points ∼3% +157%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5638 Points ∼2% +130%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57
4904 Points ∼2% +100%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8550
2455 Points ∼1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
810 Points ∼2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points ∼2%
Dell Latitude 11 5175
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57
601 Points ∼1%
3DMark 11 Performance
478 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2087 points
Help
low med. high ultra
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 19.8 9.5
Tomb Raider (2013) 24.8 10 ()
BioShock Infinite (2013) 19.5 7.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 5.3
 24.2 °C25.7 °C24.9 °C 
 24.1 °C24.8 °C24.3 °C 
 23.3 °C23.8 °C23.8 °C 
Maximum: 25.7 °C
Average: 24.3 °C
25.1 °C27.1 °C26.2 °C
24.5 °C25.6 °C24.7 °C
24 °C24.4 °C24.1 °C
Maximum: 27.1 °C
Average: 25.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (+2.2 °C / 3.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.332.831.32529.532.529.53130.136.930.14028.329.928.35026.631.226.66326.826.326.88026.726.326.710026.526.626.51252824.72816031.224.131.220032.622.232.62503021.53031537.120.737.140053.22053.250053.819.253.863056.618.556.6800541854100056.71856.7125059.517.559.5160060.317.260.3200053.917.553.9250055.917.455.9315063.217.663.2400060.617.860.650006117.861630050.117.950.1800050.117.950.11000055.917.855.91250053.417.753.41600040.722.140.7SPL70.430.270.4N25.31.425.3median 53.8median 18median 53.8Delta8.32.28.333.532.233.53231.73235.131.835.131.631.431.632.430.432.430.326.830.328.526.828.529.526.129.533.52633.536253638.224.338.238.922.738.947.22247.25621.35652.520.652.561.419.661.46819.16865.118.865.158.918.658.963.718.863.762.618.362.663.418.663.466.218.666.265.118.765.158.318.858.355.918.955.956.719.156.750.81950.844.818.844.836.318.736.374.931.274.9331.633median 56median 19median 5610.41.310.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTEHuawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 20%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 20%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 3.8 / 2.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2 / 4.6 / 5.7 Watt
Load midlight 11.5 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS , 1920x1080, 10.10
Dell Latitude 11 5175
6Y57, HD Graphics 515, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.80
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.10
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30
Power Consumption
-30%
-92%
-128%
-89%
Idle Minimum *
2
2.7
-35%
3.7
-85%
7.4
-270%
4.4
-120%
Idle Average *
4.6
5.8
-26%
6.8
-48%
11.6
-152%
9
-96%
Idle Maximum *
5.7
6.6
-16%
7.6
-33%
11.6
-104%
10.7
-88%
Load Average *
11.5
15.2
-32%
22.5
-96%
16.8
-46%
19.6
-70%
Load Maximum *
11.5
16.1
-40%
34.5
-200%
19.1
-66%
19.9
-73%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 18min
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Dell Latitude 11 5175
6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 35 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-23%
-24%
-53%
Reader / Idle
1153
791
-31%
793
-31%
732
-37%
478
-59%
WiFi v1.3
498
488
-2%
426
-14%
443
-11%
263
-47%
Load
138
172
130
106
H.264
411
432

Pros

+ 设计和稳定性
+ 稳固的屏幕转轴
+ 触控按键反馈优秀
+ 触控版易于使用
+ 可以在纸上书写绘画
+ 电池可以满足一整天使用
+ 明亮高对比度的屏幕
+ 表现不错的800万像素相机

Cons

- 接口较少
- 不支持A5尺寸纸
- eMMC闪存速度慢
- 无维护升级空间
Sketchbook for creators: Lenovo Yoga Book 2016. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.
Sketchbook for creators: Lenovo Yoga Book 2016. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.

展开、记下笔记、实现创意:Yoga Book将各种输入方式的集聚一身,更是支持前所未有的新颖纸上手写支持。

那么我能够把之前的笔记本电脑放在一边,把这台二合一设备作为主要办公Windows设备吗?答案是不能,因为Yoga Book的设计重心是作为输入界面。在课堂上,实习时,会议中或会展台上,打开Yoga Book记笔记或在纸上自由绘画,并储存在OneDrive中。其他更复杂的编辑则需要使用DTP软件如Adobe InDesign或Photoshop,在高性能笔记本电脑或台式机上进行。

Yoga Book的纸上自然手写输入是它的一个独特卖点。另一方面,它也是一台完整的Windows设备。用户可以在一定程度上使用熟悉的桌面应用程序进行编辑和其他工作。

如果需要写一篇论文的话,则需要一台更好的笔记本或桌面式键盘了。不过Yoga Book可以简化这个过程。用户不用再被特定工具或输入设备所限制。

对这个概念感兴趣的用户目前并没有什么其他的选择。没有其他一台二合一设备结合了超高便携性(续航时间,重力,机身品质),多种输入方式(触控,屏幕手写和纸上手写,键盘和触控板),以及运行Windows应用程序的能力(如完整版办公软件)。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE - 10/25/2016 v5.1(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
76%
Connectivity
46 / 80 → 57%
Weight
80 / 35-78 → 100%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
46 / 68 → 68%
Application Performance
38 / 87 → 44%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
71 / 85 → 83%
Average
73%
86%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 变形本简短评测
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-11-10 (Update: 2016-11-12)