惠普 Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 245.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 766:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
41.11% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6157 K
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV LG Philips LGD0497, IPS, 11.6", 1366x768 | Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 CMN 1130, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 AU Optronics B116XW01, TN, 11.6", 1366x768 | Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR AU Optronics B116XTN02.3, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS InfoVision M116NWR4 R1, IPS, 11.6", 1366x768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -9% | -10% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 41.11 | 40.42 -2% | 37.53 -9% | 36.86 -10% | 41.33 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 61.8 | 60.3 -2% | 56.4 -9% | 55.4 -10% | 62.3 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 42.47 | 41.82 -2% | 38.81 -9% | 38.08 -10% | 42.7 1% |
| Response Times | -62% | -23% | -65% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 42.8 ? | 80 ? -87% | 58 ? -36% | 63 ? -47% | |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 22 ? | 30 ? -36% | 24 ? -9% | 40 ? -82% | |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 50 ? | 190 ? | |||
| Screen | -40% | -52% | -43% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 245.2 | 221 -10% | 261 6% | 256 4% | 264 8% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 219 | 220 0% | 248 13% | 242 11% | 247 13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 79 | 90 14% | 90 14% | 89 13% | 90 14% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.32 | 0.29 9% | 0.3 6% | 0.68 -113% | 0.27 16% |
| Contrast (:1) | 766 | 762 -1% | 870 14% | 376 -51% | 978 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 10.31 -87% | 12.64 -130% | 8.87 -61% | 3.75 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.9 | 14.35 15% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 11.17 -285% | 13.75 -374% | 9.6 -231% | 3.28 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.88 76% | 2.2 100% | 2.59 85% |
| CCT | 6157 106% | 12620 52% | 17914 36% | 9857 66% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 39 | 39 0% | 36 -8% | 35 -10% | 39 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 62 | 60 -3% | 57 -8% | 55 -11% | 62 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-35% | -31% /
-41% | -25% /
-34% | -18% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
| ↘ 24.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8160 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 1758 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1651 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1813 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1335 points | |
Help | ||
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 HBG3e 32G eMMC | Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -1% | 1517% | 44% | 2115% | |
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 93.9 | 84.2 -10% | 159.9 70% | 118.9 27% | 164.5 75% |
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 88 | 84.5 -4% | 42.23 -52% | 117.2 33% | 67.8 -23% |
| Read 512 (MB/s) | 27.01 | 24.65 -9% | 149 452% | 38.89 44% | 165.1 511% |
| Write 512 (MB/s) | 36.08 | 24.34 -33% | 36.68 2% | 76 111% | 89.7 149% |
| Read 4k (MB/s) | 0.311 | 0.361 16% | 16.19 5106% | 0.474 52% | 18.05 5704% |
| Write 4k (MB/s) | 0.787 | 0.863 10% | 8.925 1034% | 0.99 26% | 20.49 2504% |
| Read 4k QD32 (MB/s) | 0.633 | 0.733 16% | 29.32 4532% | 1.081 71% | 32.15 4979% |
| Write 4k QD32 (MB/s) | 0.815 | 0.842 3% | 8.927 995% | 0.724 -11% | 25.44 3021% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR | |
| Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 508 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 1758 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 216 points | |
Help | ||
Noise level
| Idle |
| 0 / 0 / 0 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 0 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 0 / 0 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, HBG3e 32G eMMC | Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | |||||
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 32.4 | ||||
| Idle Average * (dB) | 32.5 | ||||
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 32.5 | ||||
| Load Average * (dB) | 32.5 | ||||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 32.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Toshiba MQ01ABF050, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), HBG3e 32G eMMC, TN, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | 46% | 10% | 41% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.7 | 5 35% | 2.8 64% | 5.6 27% | 2.6 66% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.4 | 7.8 7% | 4.7 44% | 7.7 8% | 4.8 43% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.4 | 8.7 7% | 4.9 48% | 7.8 17% | 5.1 46% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 14.7 | 14.3 3% | 9.9 33% | 16 -9% | 12.5 15% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 17.3 | 16 8% | 10.6 39% | 16 8% | 11.5 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 34.6 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), Wh | Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 50 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 30 Wh | Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -20% | 146% | 11% | ||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 7.5 | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 4.6 | 3.7 -20% | 11.3 146% | 5.1 11% | |
| Load (h) | 2.5 |
Pros
Cons
惠普Pavilion x360 11t的表现让我们感觉一言难尽。搭载升级后的四核奔腾N3710是个不错的消息,它相比同类机型的处理器提供了更高的性能,不过也带来了更大的发热量。它的键盘也十分出色,优于其他实惠型设备。按键反馈明确,响应度很高,让打字可以成为一种享受。屏幕是它的另一个优势,这块IPS屏幕相比大部分同价位设备搭配的TN屏幕提供了更高的整体表现。它的机身坚固,这台笔记本电脑做工精良,应该会十分经久耐用。
不过,它在其他方面也还是有一些问题。尽管无风扇的设计让它可以在运行中完全安静,不过发热量变得难以控制。尽管处理器更强劲,但它在高负载下处理器和显卡双双降频,反而落后于性能本应更低的竞争机型。另外,迟缓的5400转硬盘成为了对用户耐心的考验;应用需要很长的时间加载,多任务处理也有些捉襟见肘,系统的整体响应速度让人感觉较慢。
考虑到较高的540美元(约3713人民币)价位,惠普Pavilion x360 11t很难与价位较低的联想 Yoga 300-11IBR竞争。后者搭配了相似的性能,更优秀的键盘,更快的硬盘,但搭配了较差的TN屏幕。惠普经常对其产品进行促销(在我们截稿时,这款机型的特惠价为440美元,约3025人民币),这可能会让11t更有吸引力。
惠普Pavilion x360 11t将会在同类机型间遇到很强的竞争。它的配置表看起来十分吸引人,不过实际表现低于预期。因此,它只能算是中规中矩。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
- 01/23/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley






















