Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T50HD 平板电脑评测--经济实惠的 11 英寸全能型平板电脑Android 14

好的娱乐 作为一款价格低廉的 11 英寸平板电脑,Teclast T50HD 拥有丰富的功能选择。除了Android 14 之外,它还配备了 256 GB 存储空间、明亮的 IPS 显示屏、DRM Widevine L1,甚至还支持 4G 双 SIM 卡。我们的评测将揭示这款入门级平板电脑是否值得推荐。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Teclast T50HD

中国制造商 Teclast 有大量经济实惠的平板电脑在售。这些平板电脑都不提供高端性能或疯狂的功能。反过来,你可以获得平板电脑日常使用所需的一切。Teclast T50HD 也是如此,它在网上的售价已低于 150 美元。

11 英寸 T50HD 采用分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素的 IPS 显示屏。此外,该机还配备了 256 GB UFS 存储、8000 毫安时电池、4G 支持和Android 14(谷歌最新版操作系统)。

T50HD 的 Unisoc T606速度足以满足多媒体、网上冲浪和玩简单游戏的需要。此外,它还通过了 DRM Widevine L1 认证,可确保在 Netflix 和其他视频网站上进行高分辨率流媒体播放。

good (82%) Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606ARM Mali-G57 MP1 Tablet - 05/10/2024 - v7
Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Teclast T50 HD (T Series)
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
10.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 207 PPI, Touchscreen, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 243 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: brightness sensor, gravity sensor, hall sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (1/2/5/8) 4G (1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 257.1 x 169.2
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Limited, fanless
Weight
500 g, Power Supply: 43 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.7 %
05/2024
Teclast T50 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
500 g7.9 mm10.95"1920x1200
80.4 %
01/2024
Blackview Tab 80
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
484 g7.5 mm10.10"1280x800
84.2 %
02/2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g6.9 mm11.00"1920x1200
79.3 %
04/2024
Teclast M50
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
460 g8 mm10.10"1280x800
81.5 %
09/2023
Telekom T Tablet
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
490 g7.8 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.5 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
481 g7.36 mm11.00"1920x1200

外壳 - Teclast T50HD 采用铝制外壳

T50HD 的铝制外壳边缘圆润,看起来非常漂亮,你根本看不出这款 Teclast 平板电脑有多便宜。它的边框宽度约为 1 厘米,这让这款 11 英寸设备看起来相当现代,同时确保您在握持它时不会意外激活触摸屏。

T50HD 没有通过 IP 认证,如果你真的想要,你可以很容易地凹陷和扭曲 7.9 毫米厚的外壳。即便如此,这款平板电脑在日常使用中也足够稳定,500 克的重量也不算太重,这意味着你可以用一只手握住它很长时间。

另一方面,我们不太喜欢制造商在平板电脑上预装屏幕保护膜的做法。由于屏幕保护膜相对较软,你几乎无法避免留下一两处划痕--在我们的测试过程中,即使我们小心翼翼地操作平板电脑,划痕还是很快就出现了。

Teclast T50HD 只有一种颜色,灰色磨砂后盖。背面最抢眼的设计元素是采用高光处理的摄像头模块和 "AI 双摄像头 "字样。这看起来很整洁,暗示着先进的技术--但遗憾的是,这显然是表象多于实际,因为摄像头并不能提供比快照质量更高的效果。

Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

尺寸比较

257.1 mm 169.2 mm 7.9 mm 500 g257.1 mm 168.7 mm 6.9 mm 480 g255.53 mm 167.08 mm 7.36 mm 481 g247.6 mm 157.1 mm 7.8 mm 490 g241 mm 156 mm 7.5 mm 484 g238 mm 158 mm 8 mm 460 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连接性 - 256 GB 存储空间和双卡双待

T50HD 配备了充足的内存和存储空间,分别为 6 GB 和 256 GB。Teclast 甚至提到了最高 14 GB 的内存,不过,额外的 8 GB 内存并没有带来多少好处,因为它们是通过内部存储中的交换文件提供的,而交换文件的运行速度要比内存慢得多。内存扩展默认为激活状态,但可随时通过Android 设置关闭。

T50HD 的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度运行,并支持 USB-OTG,例如可以将 USB 驱动器连接到平板电脑。您还可以通过 microSD 插槽扩展其内部存储空间,该插槽支持最大 1 TB 的存储卡。您还可以直接在旁边插入 SIM 卡。如果你决定不使用 microSD 卡,那么实际上你甚至可以同时插入两张 SIM 卡。该设备还配有一个用于音频设备的 3.5 毫米插孔。

左:扬声器
左:扬声器
右侧SIM/ microSD 插槽、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
右侧SIM/ microSD 插槽、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
顶部:麦克风、音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部:麦克风、音量摇杆、电源按钮
底部:麦克风
底部:麦克风

microSD 读卡器

结合我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡,该读卡器在同价位产品中实现了非常好的数据吞吐量。在连续读写测试中,它与三星 Tab A9+ 内的读卡器一样快。 三星Galaxy Tab A9+.在复制测试中,它领先于大多数对比设备,达到了 41.2 MByte/s。只有三星平板电脑在这方面更快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +15%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
41.2 MB/s
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.5 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.92 MB/s -30%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.6 MB/s -35%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.02 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.8 (28.1-47.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.8 (41.8-84.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 -Android 14 和 DRM Widevine L1

Teclast 平板电脑不仅可以运行最新版本的Android (Android 14),而且没有预装第三方赞助的应用程序,这意味着你可以非常有效地利用可用存储空间。T50HD 支持 DRM Widevine L1,因此你可以从 Netflix 等流媒体平台流式传输高分辨率内容。

在 5 月初进行测试时,最新的Android 安全补丁是从 2 月 5 日开始的,因此已经不是完全最新的了。即使直接询问 Teclast,制造商也无法向我们透露 T50HD 的更新时间和频率。

Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 性能稳定,GPS 性能较差

Teclast T50HD 支持最快的无线局域网标准 WiFi 5,还可以通过蓝牙 5.0 进行短距离通信。它不支持 NFC。

当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时,T50HD 提供了良好而稳定的 WLAN 传输速率。其峰值为 358 MBit/s,几乎达到了标准的最大数据吞吐量。在对比设备中,只有 电信 T 平板电脑速度稍快。

您可以在 T50HD 上使用 4G 上网。它支持 4G 频段 1、3、5、7、8、20、34、38、39、40 和 41,确保在进行测试的欧盟境内接收良好。

Networking
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
320 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼96%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
44.1 (min: 27) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
47.8 (min: 32) MBit/s ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼99%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
302 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
353 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼95%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (196-336)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (340-367)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

T50HD 通过卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass、Galileo 和 Beidou(均为单波段模式)确定位置。不过,它的定位速度并不快,在室内我们无法获得结果。在室外,该平板电脑能以 7 米的精度定位我们。

我们的实际测试表明,该平板电脑仅部分适用于导航目的。与我们拿来比较的健身智能手表 Garmin Venu 2 相比,T50HD 记录的 4 公里长的路线非常不精确。它在建筑物间抄近路,有时会跳过整条街道,或者认为我们是在河里,而不是在跨河大桥上。

GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:概述
GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:概述
GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:转折点
GPS 测试 Teclast T50HD:转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转折点
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转折点

相机 - 仅有快照质量

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

T50HD 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 8 百万像素,拍摄的照片并不特别明亮或清晰。即便如此,它的画质仍足以满足视频通话的需要。它的最大分辨率为 720p,每秒 30 帧。

平板电脑的主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素,与自拍摄像头一样,配有 LED 闪光灯。用户可以看到两个镜头,但底部的镜头只是用作深度传感器,分辨率为 30 万像素。

在光线条件良好的情况下,主摄像头可以拍摄出可用的照片,但照片质量并不高。照片的动态效果较差,看起来有点贫血,几乎就像在日食期间拍摄的一样。图像细节很少,同质区域被冲淡,图像噪点逐渐渗入图像的暗部。光照条件差时,相机会完全无法拍摄。

主摄像头可以高达 1080p 和每秒 30 帧的速度录制视频。录制视频时的画质与拍照质量相当。反过来,摄像头也能相对快速地适应光线条件的变化。自动对焦功能也相当可靠。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Low-light photo

随后,我们仔细观察了主摄像头在可控光线条件下的画质。在最佳照明条件下,主摄像头能准确捕捉色彩,但测试图却显得模糊不清。在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下,ColorChecker 色卡和测试图几乎完全消失在黑暗中。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 HD: 5.72 ∆E min: 1.63 - max: 11.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50 HD: 46.24 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 92.92 ∆E

配件和保修 - Teclast T50HD 配有 10 瓦电源

Teclast T50HD 随附一个 10 瓦电源(5V/2A)、一条 USB 线缆(Type-A 到 Type-C)、一个 SIM 卡工具、一本简短的说明书和一张保修卡。制造商还通过其网站为平板电脑提供了一个对开式保护套。

Teclast T50HD 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器,但可进行 2D 面部识别

Teclast 平板电脑的触摸屏能对输入做出快速而精确的反应。与同类产品一样,它的刷新率为 60 赫兹。

T50HD 没有配备指纹传感器。不过,你可以通过 2D 面部识别技术对平板电脑进行生物解锁,这种技术在弱光环境下也能很好地工作。锁定设备的其他方法包括模式、PIN 码和密码。

水平键盘
水平键盘
直立式键盘
直立式键盘

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 面板

子像素
子像素

T50HD 的 11 英寸显示屏分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素,纵横比为 16:10,像素密度为 207 PPI。在 APL18 测试中(图像明暗区域分布均匀),该屏幕的最大亮度达到 528 cd/m²,这意味着它是对比领域中最亮的设备。

我们没有在 IPS 显示屏上测量到任何 PWM。因此,对屏幕闪烁反应敏感的人可以毫不犹豫地购买这款平板电脑。

431
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 500 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 457 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 1515:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.016
Teclast T50 HD
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.95
Blackview Tab 80
LCD, 1280x800, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11.00
Teclast M50
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Telekom T Tablet
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.40
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11.00
Screen
-8%
-21%
-44%
-52%
15%
Brightness middle
500
425
-15%
493
-1%
371
-26%
529
6%
473
-5%
Brightness
457
423
-7%
460
1%
369
-19%
486
6%
449
-2%
Brightness Distribution
86
83
-3%
90
5%
87
1%
87
1%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.33
0.4
-21%
0.35
-6%
0.45
-36%
0.56
-70%
0.28
15%
Contrast
1515
1063
-30%
1409
-7%
824
-46%
945
-38%
1689
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.64
5.11
-10%
6
-29%
7.46
-61%
9.6
-107%
3
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.02
9.8
-9%
11.7
-30%
16.5
-83%
14.4
-60%
6
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
2.8
32%
8.2
-100%
7.4
-80%
10.5
-156%
2.7
34%
Gamma
2.016 109%
2.183 101%
2.21 100%
2.055 107%
2.17 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
7316 89%
7136 91%
9131 71%
8423 77%
10482 62%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

IPS 显示屏拥有对比度丰富的显示效果(1515:1),在其他图像参数的测试中也表现出色。它的效果并不完全理想,但对于这个价位的产品来说还是可以接受的。这也是因为它的整体色彩偏差较小,在日常使用中应该不会很明显。

色彩精度
色彩精度
灰度
灰度
色彩饱和度
色彩饱和度
sRGB 色彩空间覆盖范围
sRGB 色彩空间覆盖范围
DCI-P3 色彩空间覆盖范围
DCI-P3 色彩空间覆盖范围
AdobeRGB 色彩空间覆盖范围
AdobeRGB 色彩空间覆盖范围

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.1 ms rise
↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.1 ms rise
↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

即使在明亮的日子里,可视角度稳定的 IPS 面板上的内容依然清晰可辨。相比之下,阳光直射会给设备带来一些问题,因为强烈的反光经常会阻碍你的视线。另一方面,在阴暗的地方,显示屏的阅读也相当舒适。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备 Unisoc T606 的 Teclast T50HD

产品 Unisoc T606Teclast T50HD 内部的 Unisoc T606 是一位熟悉的朋友,也用于该制造商生产的许多其他平板电脑。这颗于 2019 年底推出的八核 SoC 并不是什么性能奇迹,因为在日常使用中时不时会出现卡顿或小延迟。另一方面,Teclast 平板电脑在上网和观看视频时速度足够快。如果图形计算要求不高,游戏也能流畅运行。

正如其合成基准测试结果所显示的,Teclast T50HD 可以与同价位的竞争对手相抗衡。其性能与 小米红米 Pad SE相似,后者配备了 骁龙 680 4G.电信 T 平板电脑 电信 T 平板电脑(联发科 Dimensity 700)和 三星Galaxy Tab A9+(骁龙 695 5G) 则与 T50HD 保持着较为明显的距离。

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=50, last 2 years)
2771 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1993 Points +51%
Telekom T Tablet
1919 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1439 Points +9%
Teclast M50
1386 Points +5%
Average UNISOC T606 (1285 - 1482, n=10)
1364 Points +3%
Teclast T50 HD
1319 Points
Blackview Tab 80
1298 Points -2%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=50, last 2 years)
936 Points +154%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
919 Points +150%
Telekom T Tablet
711 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
413 Points +12%
Teclast M50
380 Points +3%
Blackview Tab 80
377 Points +2%
Average UNISOC T606 (368 - 380, n=10)
375 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
368 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
693 Points +131%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=72, last 2 years)
668 Points +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
384 Points +28%
Blackview Tab 80
309 Points +3%
Teclast M50
309 Points +3%
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=18)
306 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
300 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=72, last 2 years)
2359 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1768 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1684 Points +38%
Teclast M50
1305 Points +7%
Blackview Tab 80
1245 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD
1217 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=18)
1204 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2547454, n=22, last 2 years)
558338 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
422144 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
287727 Points +17%
Teclast T50 HD
245367 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (221540 - 245773, n=5)
236072 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 80
221540 Points -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=54, last 2 years)
464531 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
354299 Points +50%
Teclast T50 HD
236491 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (202973 - 238808, n=5)
222518 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
201810 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
10550 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=69, last 2 years)
8907 Points +22%
Telekom T Tablet
8329 Points +14%
Teclast M50
7383 Points +1%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=18)
7338 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
7321 Points
Blackview Tab 80
7178 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
7068 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1880, n=55, last 2 years)
696 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
578 Points +60%
Telekom T Tablet
534 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
402 Points +11%
Teclast T50 HD
362 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (339 - 362, n=4)
350 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=55, last 2 years)
3694 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3596 Points +91%
Telekom T Tablet
2839 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2551 Points +36%
Average UNISOC T606 (1879 - 1954, n=6)
1911 Points +2%
Blackview Tab 80
1887 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
1879 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7626 Points +90%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=55, last 2 years)
6641 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5580 Points +39%
Telekom T Tablet
4934 Points +23%
Blackview Tab 80
4335 Points +8%
Average UNISOC T606 (4009 - 4362, n=6)
4289 Points +7%
Teclast T50 HD
4009 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=55, last 2 years)
4353 Points +62%
Telekom T Tablet
3923 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
3872 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
3120 Points +16%
Average UNISOC T606 (2675 - 3095, n=6)
2784 Points +4%
Teclast T50 HD
2679 Points
Blackview Tab 80
2675 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=55, last 2 years)
6808 Points +563%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
4337 Points +322%
Telekom T Tablet
2667 Points +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2179 Points +112%
Blackview Tab 80
1076 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
1027 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (989 - 1076, n=6)
1023 Points 0%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
1307 Points +16%
Telekom T Tablet
1258 Points +11%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=55, last 2 years)
1218 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD
1129 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1116 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T606 (1034 - 1129, n=6)
1100 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80
1034 Points -8%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=41, last 2 years)
5099 Points +1754%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
429 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
348 Points +27%
Teclast T50 HD
275 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (256 - 280, n=5)
274 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80
256 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Telekom T Tablet
9056 Points +163%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=52, last 2 years)
8837 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
5687 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4150 Points +21%
Teclast T50 HD
3441 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (2678 - 3748, n=6)
3004 Points -13%
Blackview Tab 80
2678 Points -22%

Legend

 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast M50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

产品 Unisoc T606包含 ARM Mali-G57 MP1图形处理器,使 T50HD 在运行应用程序时具有稳定的图形性能。然而,游戏给图形处理器带来了巨大挑战。GFXBench 的 T-Rex 基准测试表明,即使是图形简单的游戏,也无法保证每秒 30 帧的速度,因此也无法保证相当流畅的显示效果。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +209%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
123 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
101 Points -14%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
89 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +186%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1171 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
574 Points +36%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
424 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
421 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +188%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1173 Points +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
589 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
432 Points +2%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points +1%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
422 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +214%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2511 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1429 Points +46%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
989 Points +1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
979 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +260%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2321 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1309 Points +58%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
829 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
822 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +29%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2659 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2647 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2593 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +273%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps +68%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +55%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +323%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +86%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +221%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +143%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
27 fps +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +50%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +213%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +153%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +47%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +275%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +161%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +170%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +69%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -2%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +258%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +126%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps +42%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +252%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +50%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps +6%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +144%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps +112%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps +56%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +310%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +65%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.1 fps +5%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +289%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +122%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +104%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps +67%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +300%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps +78%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -4%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +309%
Telekom T Tablet
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.88 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -9%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -9%

浏览器基准测试显示的情况略有不同,因为与 Telekom T Tablet 等平板电脑相比,其性能几乎没有差别。 电信 T 平板电脑小米红米 Pad SE.在日常使用中,您可以在 Teclast 平板电脑上快速上网,网站加载速度也很快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +83%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 329, n=63, last 2 years)
90 Points +70%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
58.17 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
52.9 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD
52.862 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (38.1 - 52.9, n=7)
48.1 Points -9%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
47.753 Points -10%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +91%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=60, last 2 years)
87 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
57 Points +2%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
56 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
56 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (51 - 56, n=6)
52.3 Points -7%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
51 Points -9%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
144 Points +67%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 414, n=46, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
93 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
86 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (77 - 86, n=3)
80.3 Points -7%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
78 Points -9%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 571, n=56, last 2 years)
88.4 runs/min +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
53.5 runs/min +3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
52.1 runs/min
Average UNISOC T606 (31.2 - 52.1, n=6)
39.6 runs/min -24%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
36.9 runs/min -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +122%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105035, n=78, last 2 years)
24224 Points +83%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
21843 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)
14279 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
13211 Points
Teclast M50 (Chrome 122)
12461 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
11786 Points -11%
Average UNISOC T606 (2228 - 13211, n=13)
11168 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (326 - 34733, n=64, last 2 years)
3273 ms * -10%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
3176.1 ms * -7%
Average UNISOC T606 (2966 - 3187, n=6)
3069 ms * -3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)
2965.7 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
2650.1 ms * +11%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)
2194.9 ms * +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 存储器帮助 Teclast T50HD 实现了非常高的传输速率。这在日常使用中非常明显,即使是大型应用程序也能快速加载。

Teclast T50 HDBlackview Tab 80Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast M50Telekom T TabletXiaomi Redmi Pad SEAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-72%
-43%
-73%
-74%
-59%
-8%
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB
970.01
266.71
-73%
485.96
-50%
269.9
-72%
287.1
-70%
297.47
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
831.36
235.98
-72%
476.37
-43%
196
-76%
188.3
-77%
228.97
-72%
699 ?(369 - 913, n=24)
-16%
Random Read 4KB
218.22
65.11
-70%
130.67
-40%
69.6
-68%
52.8
-76%
102.41
-53%
Random Write 4KB
257.68
70.74
-73%
162.9
-37%
62.3
-76%
66.55
-74%
146.92
-43%

游戏 - 运行很少流畅

我们使用Gamebench来测试平板电脑运行游戏的性能。遗憾的是,Teclast T50HD 拒绝向我们的测试程序提供数据,因此我们无法提供任何帧速率。

尽管如此,没有准确的 FPS 数据也能很好地评估 T50HD 的游戏性能。在最低图形设置下可以玩《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》等要求较高的游戏,但运行起来并不十分流畅。低性能 ARM Mali-G57 MP1图形芯片只能在图形简单的游戏中运行,如《死亡扳机 2》或《地铁冲浪者》。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
No graph data

排放物 - 带立体声的酷平板电脑

温度

在运行过程中,T50HD 保持低温。在使用 Burnout 基准进行 1 小时的压力测试后,我们测得的最高表面温度为 89.6 华氏度(32 摄氏度)。3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试表明,即使在连续负载的情况下,平板电脑实际上也能始终发挥其全部性能。

Max. Load
 26.3 °C32 °C26.9 °C 
 26.5 °C28 °C26.3 °C 
 26.2 °C26 °C25.8 °C 
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 27.1 °C
27.7 °C31.5 °C26.4 °C
27.4 °C29 °C27.7 °C
27 °C27.1 °C27.1 °C
Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 27.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 361 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99 (2.14min - 2.16max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
97.3 (0.72min - 0.741max) %
Teclast M50
85.3 (0.58min - 0.68max) %
Blackview Tab 80
81.3 (0.55min - 0.676max) %
Teclast T50 HD
%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.6 (3.49min - 3.5max) % +1%
Telekom T Tablet
99.6 (7.07min - 7.1max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
99.5 (7.23min - 7.27max) % 0%
Teclast T50 HD
99.1 (2.53min - 2.55max) %
Teclast M50
98.9 (2.54min - 2.57max) % 0%
Blackview Tab 80
98.2 (2.52min - 2.56max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.9 (3.52min - 3.53max) %
Telekom T Tablet
99.5 (6.99min - 7.03max) %

Legend

 
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Teclast M50 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Teclast T50HD
Teclast T50HD

发言人

立体声扬声器位于 Teclast 平板电脑内部,音量高达 80.4 dB(A),听起来丝毫不失真。它们的音质很好,但缺少低音。而中高音则相对均衡。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.0 与平板电脑连接。可用的蓝牙编解码器有 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.740.92533.234.13129.3284032.331.15040.7366332.628.38019.72110016.923.812515.524.316013.330.22009.631.625011.831.83159.239.94008.749.85001154.163013.258.680013.769.2100014.870.7125013.768.9160010.667.5200010.963.4250012.362.9315013.760.4400013.666.8500013.973.3630014.472.4800015.671.11000015.963.11250016641600016.749.3SPL25.880.4N0.744.5median 13.7median 62.9Delta2.112.928.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T50 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T50 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池续航时间长,但充电速度慢

耗电量

与竞争对手相比,Teclast T50HD 相当节能。在空闲模式下,它只需要 1.8 瓦,而在负载情况下,功耗会增加到适中的 2.8 瓦。

通过随附的电源适配器,8000 毫安时电池的最大充电功率为 10 瓦。使用其他电源装置,例如我们使用的来自 Ugreen 的 65 瓦电源装置,我们无法从平板电脑中获得更高的充电功率。

给平板电脑充电时必须耐心。在我们的测试中,空电池需要 5 小时 5 分钟才能恢复到 100%的电量。因此,在实际操作中,最好是通宵为平板电脑充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.8 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 2.8 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast T50 HD
8000 mAh
Blackview Tab 80
7680 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Telekom T Tablet
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
26%
-112%
-122%
-104%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.8
50%
1
37%
1.28
20%
0.63
61%
Idle Average *
1.8
1
44%
4.76
-164%
4.52
-151%
4.25
-136%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.5
25%
4.79
-140%
4.58
-129%
4.34
-117%
Load Average *
2.8
3.2
-14%
9.52
-240%
10.5
-275%
10.24
-266%
Load Maximum *
6.4
4.9
23%
9.92
-55%
11.2
-75%
10.47
-64%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Teclast T50 HD UNISOC T606: Ø3.86 (1.833-6.32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.24.5