Teclast T40 HD 平板电脑评测--配备大量快速存储和移动数据的经济型平板电脑

Name: Teclast T40 HD
Brand: Teclast

家猫 10.36 英寸平板电脑 Teclast T40 HD 配备了更快的 UFS-2.0 存储设备，这在这个价位的产品中很少见。此外，您还可以使用 SIM 卡在设备上上网。这个价格听起来很划算，但它也有弱点吗？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/03/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

中国公司 Teclast 提供了大量物美价廉的平板电脑，其中大部分都具有大容量存储空间和大容量电池，让您可以在设备上拍摄大量照片和视频，并长久回味。

Teclast T40 HD 也具备这些功能：只需 200 多美元就能获得 128 GB 的存储空间和 7,200 mAh 的大容量电池，甚至还能使用 SIM 卡打电话或上网。如果说有什么不足的话，那就是它相对较慢的处理器让我们有些担心。

在这篇评测中，我们将对这款平板电脑进行更深入的了解，同时试图找出竞争对手是否能跟上其丰富功能的步伐，或者它是否真的能做到更多。

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T40 HD (T Series)

Processor

UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

Display

10.36 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 225 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 115 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity, hall

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 246 x 156

Battery

7200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10-watt charging

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (camera 1), 0,3 MP (camera 2), LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, stereo speakers

Weight

462 g

Price

190 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.3 %	01/2024	Teclast T40 HD T606, Mali-G57 MP1	462 g	7.7 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
79.9 %	10/2023	Teclast M50 Pro T616, Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	7.9 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.2 %	05/2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	477 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
80 %	03/2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.2 %	01/2023	Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	7.9 mm	10.40"	2000x1200

外壳 - 引人注目的金属外壳

这款平板电脑采用太空灰金属一体成型外壳--在配色方面，制造商显然借鉴了Apple 的做法。背面的拉丝工艺给人一种高品质的感觉，顶部摄像头旁边的小塑料条可以为天线提供足够的信号强度。

它的外壳做工精致，抗压性能良好。不过，当你扭动设备时，会听到明显的吱吱声--几乎就像连接处打开后又卡回原位一样。Teclast T40 HD 的重量为 460 克，在同类产品中表现不错。就其尺寸而言，它既不是特别重，也不是轻如鸿毛。

它的占地面积在同类产品中也属于中等水平。平板电脑的边框并不十分纤薄，但这让你在握持时不会意外启动触摸屏。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Huawei MatePad SE Teclast T40 HD Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Teclast M50 Pro DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 大量文件空间

在这个价位的产品中，128 GB 的存储空间和 8 GB 的运行内存已算充裕。

它的 USB-C 端口使用 USB-2.0 标准连接，因此有线数据传输并不比其他设备快，而且无法使用此连接输出图片。它不支持 NFC。

由于配备了 3.5 毫米插孔，你可以连接耳机和扬声器，而无需占用 USB-C 端口。

在平板电脑外壳底部右侧有一个插槽，最多可容纳 2 张 SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡，让您可以扩展存储空间。

microSD 读卡器

Teclast T40 HD 支持最大 1 TB 存储容量的 microSD 卡。我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡对读卡器进行了测试。

在复制测试中，将 250 张照片从 SD 卡传输到平板电脑的内部存储空间，Teclast T40 HD 的表现相当出色，达到了 34.3 MB/s。这使它能够快速访问 microSD 卡，从而轻松存储数据。

在 CPDT 基准测试中，该读卡器也表现出相当快的速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.3 MB/s
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	27.6 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.9 MB/s -39%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	19.7 MB/s -43%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.5 (25.2-48.7)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø26.6 (11.8-45.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø36.1 (13.9-54.3)

Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.2 (40.1-77.5)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.6 (41.9-85.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø52.3 (17.2-85.2)

软件 - 库存Android ，更新不频繁

制造商在平板电脑上安装了Android 13，它几乎没有改变谷歌操作系统的任何功能。它没有任何赞助商，也几乎没有预装任何额外的应用程序，这意味着你可以随心所欲地填充设备的存储空间。

在测试时，最新的安全补丁是 2023 年 8 月发布的，距今已有一段时间。当被问及制造商将在多长时间内为平板电脑提供更新时，Teclast 表示仍在努力解决这个问题，据称很快就会公布一份清单。目前预计 2 到 3 年内不会有频繁的更新。你可能会认为这款平板电脑将使用Android 14，但这尚未得到证实。

由于支持 Widevine L1，您可以享受所有主要供应商提供的高清流媒体服务。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是移动数据

WiFi 5 是 Teclast 平板电脑所掌握的最快无线局域网标准--在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中，它的传输速率达到了 306 至 358 MBit/s 左右，在同类产品中处于平均水平。总之，它的传输速率相当稳定。

在靠近路由器的地方，网站加载速度很快，在距离路由器 10 米的地方，中间有 3 面墙，你仍然可以获得原始信号的 3/4。网站加载速度仍然很快，但可以感觉到传输速率并不高。

您还可以使用高达 4G 的蜂窝网络，以便随时随地上网或打电话。Teclast T40 HD 的信号接收能力不错，但无法与高端手机相比。在市区内，我们在整个测试过程中都能成功连接到网络。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	319 (259^min - 336^max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	317 (251^min - 326^max) MBit/s +4%
Huawei MatePad SE	310 (284^min - 330^max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T40 HD	306 (249^min - 318^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad SE	365 (352^min - 379^max) MBit/s +2%
Teclast M50 Pro	358 (316^min - 374^max) MBit/s 0%
Teclast T40 HD	358 (343^min - 369^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	218 (172^min - 258^max) MBit/s -39%

Teclast T40 HD; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (249-318)

Teclast T40 HD; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (343-369)

我们分析了 Teclast T40 HD 的卫星定位服务的准确性，因为这款平板电脑支持所有主要的定位网络。如果你走出家门，在被定位到精确度为 9 米的位置之前，你会面临相当长的等待时间。这表明 Teclast pad 的定位精度并不是最高的。

这一点在我们的实际测试（自行车旅行）中得到了证实，我们在测试中还带上了 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行比较。Teclast T40 HD 也许能相对准确地记录转弯点，但在狭窄的小巷和过桥时，它就出现了很大的偏差。因此，这款测试设备只适合在不需要依赖高精度的情况下用于导航。

相机 - 可用，但不是最好的

与大多数平板电脑一样，Teclast T40 HD 的重点并不在于摄像头的质量。因此，该设备背面的 1300 万像素镜头非常简单，30 万像素镜头也不能单独用于拍照。

拍摄出来的照片带有相当重的蓝色色调，浅色区域曝光过度，几乎看不出任何细节，大面积区域往往被描绘得有些模糊。在光线不足的情况下，图像也缺少一些动态效果。总的来说，它的图像清晰度还不错，偶尔在光线良好的条件下拍摄快照，相机也能正常工作。

视频录制最高可达 1080p 和 30 fps。在拍摄时，自动对焦有时会比较费时，可以看到抽动的现象。其画质尚可。

平板电脑正面有一个分辨率为 800 万像素的自拍摄像头。即使在光线条件良好的情况下，我们也会注意到一些色调。照片的细节和清晰度都还不错，这意味着只要你对照片质量的期望值不是太高，就绝对可以使用该摄像头。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plant Main camera surroundings Main camera low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的照片实验室，我们在可控的照明条件下，使用设备背面的主摄像头拍摄了测试图和色彩图。我们在全棚照明和仅有 1 勒克斯的条件下各进行了一次拍摄。在光线不足的情况下，摄像头几乎捕捉不到任何图像信息，而在光线充足的情况下（如前所述），我们注意到颜色有色差，有些区域描绘得不太清晰。

ColorChecker Teclast T40 HD: 13.78 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.68 ∆E

配件和保修 - 提供对开式保护套

该平板电脑的供货范围包括电源、USB 线缆以及用于打开 SIM/MicroSD 插槽的工具。Teclast 还提供对开式保护套，可在其网站上购买。

制造商只为这款设备提供 12 个月的保修服务，建议在购买时参考。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

Teclast T40 HD 的触摸屏刷新率不超过 60 Hz。不过，它的显示还是相当精确的，可以精确到边边角角。

电源键和音量摇杆的操作也很可靠。

T40 HD 没有配备指纹传感器。而您可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别解锁。一旦学会，就能可靠地识别人脸，并迅速解锁平板电脑。不过，纯粹的 2D 面部识别并不那么安全，可以使用面具或图片来覆盖。

显示屏：高分辨率，但有色差

平板电脑的 IPS 显示屏直径为 10.36 英寸，分辨率为 2,000 x 1,200 像素。这块屏幕足够大，可以显示没有任何可见像素的图像。屏幕的平均最大亮度为 346 cd/m²，在同价位产品中算是比较亮的，但总的来说还是更适合室内使用。

色彩看起来比较柔和，自然描绘的爱好者会喜欢。与此同时，我们在使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测试时发现，它的红色色调很重。我们还注意到，屏幕对色彩（尤其是浅绿色和蓝色）的描绘不是很准确。总而言之，我们不建议使用该屏幕来评估打印色彩。

该显示屏不需要 PWM，因此敏感用户在使用 Teclast T40 HD 时应该没有问题。


331 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	353 cd/m²
349 cd/m²	367 cd/m²	345 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	343 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 367 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 346.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 12.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 918:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.169

	Teclast T40 HD IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36	Teclast M50 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40
Screen		9%	-3%	10%	24%
Brightness middle	367	248 -32%	322 -12%	343 -7%	398 8%
Brightness	346	234 -32%	303 -12%	332 -4%	368 6%
Brightness Distribution	90	86 -4%	89 -1%	94 4%	87 -3%
Black Level *	0.4	0.2 50%	0.45 -13%	0.31 22%	0.46 -15%
Contrast	918	1240 35%	716 -22%	1106 20%	865 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.54	5.3 19%	7.02 -7%	5.9 10%	2.17 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.53	11.95 18%	10.38 29%	11.2 23%	4.32 70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.7	7.1 18%	7.1 18%	7.9 9%	3.1 64%
Gamma	2.169 ^101%	2.327 ^95%	2.179 ^101%	2.184 ^101%	2.214 ^99%
CCT	7952 ^82%	8112 ^80%	8730 ^74%	9198 ^71%	7245 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.8 ms rise
27.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.2 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在明亮的日子里，屏幕亮度勉强可以保持清晰可读。在阴凉处，您也可以不时在户外使用这款平板电脑。

屏幕的可视角度很好，这意味着你可以从任何角度阅读，甚至是非常平的角度。

性能 - 还可以更好

Teclast T40 HD 型摄像机 Unisoc T60是一款相当薄弱的 SoC。因此，该平板电脑在许多基准测试中都落后于对比设备。与此同时，这些差异通常不会太大，以至于你在日常使用中很难察觉。根据我们的基准测试，这款平板电脑在人工智能计算方面也不是最出色的。

如果你只想用 T40 HD 完成简单的任务，那就不会有任何问题：即使使用分屏模式，许多应用程序也能流畅运行。不过，偶尔也会遇到一些短暂的等待时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points +115%
Huawei MatePad SE	377 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	373 Points +21%
Teclast M50 Pro	360 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points +12%
Teclast T40 HD	309 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=16)	307 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points +78%
Huawei MatePad SE	1630 Points +23%
Teclast M50 Pro	1469 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1345 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD	1324 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points -4%
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=16)	1199 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)	812 Points +115%
Teclast M50 Pro	439 Points +16%
Teclast T40 HD	378 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (371 - 380, n=8)	376 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)	2287 Points +63%
Teclast M50 Pro	1606 Points +14%
Teclast T40 HD	1403 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (1285 - 1482, n=8)	1374 Points -2%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points +108%
Teclast M50 Pro	230647 Points +6%
Average UNISOC T606 (202973 - 238808, n=4)	219025 Points 0%
Teclast T40 HD	218100 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	213115 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad SE	201897 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points -8%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points +22%
Teclast M50 Pro	8055 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	7404 Points +3%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=16)	7294 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD	7155 Points
Huawei MatePad SE	5432 Points -24%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points +96%
Teclast M50 Pro	390 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	359 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points +4%
Average UNISOC T606 (339 - 355, n=3)	346 Points +1%
Teclast T40 HD	343 Points
Huawei MatePad SE	335 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points +89%
Huawei MatePad SE	2580 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2550 Points +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points +19%
Teclast M50 Pro	2126 Points +11%
Teclast T40 HD	1921 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (1887 - 1954, n=5)	1917 Points 0%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points +50%
Huawei MatePad SE	5760 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	5507 Points +26%
Teclast M50 Pro	4969 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points +10%
Teclast T40 HD	4358 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (4332 - 4362, n=5)	4344 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points +55%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad SE	3381 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	3178 Points +15%
Teclast M50 Pro	3035 Points +10%
Average UNISOC T606 (2675 - 3095, n=5)	2805 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD	2757 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points +550%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2124 Points +108%
Huawei MatePad SE	1994 Points +95%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points +47%
Teclast M50 Pro	1148 Points +12%
Average UNISOC T606 (989 - 1076, n=5)	1023 Points 0%
Teclast T40 HD	1021 Points
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points +9%
Teclast M50 Pro	1181 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad SE	1141 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1138 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points 0%
Teclast T40 HD	1110 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (1034 - 1123, n=5)	1094 Points -1%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)	5325 Points +1802%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	304 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points +8%
Teclast M50 Pro	297 Points +6%
Teclast T40 HD	280 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (256 - 280, n=4)	273 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad SE	264 Points -6%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points +225%
Huawei MatePad SE	4228 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	4094 Points +50%
Average UNISOC T606 (2678 - 3748, n=5)	2916 Points +7%
Teclast M50 Pro	2892 Points +6%
Teclast T40 HD	2735 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -39%

Legend

Teclast T40 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Teclast M50 Pro UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average UNISOC T606

Average of class Tablet

另一方面，即使是简单的 3D 应用和使用屏幕的全分辨率，图形单元也勉强够用。只有在降低分辨率时，画面才会开始变得流畅。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 Points +83%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points +31%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	120 Points +19%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	101 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	189 Points +122%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points +59%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	128 Points +51%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points +42%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	85 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	722 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points +24%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	440 Points +4%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	422 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	721 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points +24%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	477 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	441 Points +4%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	424 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1527 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1330 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points +17%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points +13%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	978 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1332 Points +61%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1156 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points +18%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points +13%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	829 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3124 Points +18%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3001 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +7%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2809 Points +6%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2651 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +81%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	36 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps +48%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps +10%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	21 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +86%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	40 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +45%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps +9%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	22 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +71%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +43%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +36%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps +14%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +86%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +43%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps +14%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +67%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +55%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +31%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps +15%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8.4 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +72%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +38%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps +11%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8.7 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps +76%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.3 fps +46%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps +28%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps +16%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +83%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.9 fps +49%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +25%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps +11%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.3 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps +79%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps +36%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.8 fps +15%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3.3 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.7 fps +85%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps +35%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps +10%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps +81%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.6 fps +65%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps +42%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6 fps +15%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +82%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.3 fps +69%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps +42%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps +11%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.5 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.6 fps +93%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +69%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps +45%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps +18%
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	0.83 fps

在网上冲浪时，我们的测试设备其实并不差--它加载网页的速度通常很快。有时您可能需要等待图片加载，但总的来说，Teclast T40 HD 的上网速度还是很快的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points +73%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57.176 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	49.8 Points +1%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)	49.095 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (38.1 - 50.2, n=6)	47.3 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	35.746 Points -27%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	58 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points +2%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)	52 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (51 - 52, n=5)	51.6 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	41 Points -21%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	93 Points
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	86 Points
Average UNISOC T606 (77 - 78, n=2)	77.5 Points
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	58 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min +97%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	46.6 runs/min +19%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)	39.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)	38.16 runs/min -2%
Average UNISOC T606 (31.2 - 39.3, n=5)	37.1 runs/min -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min -12%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	32.7 runs/min -16%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points +81%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	14855 Points +17%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)	12696 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	12681 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points -6%
Average UNISOC T606 (2228 - 12696, n=11)	10889 Points -14%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	10370 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	3460.5 ms * -15%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -7%
Average UNISOC T606 (3013 - 3187, n=5)	3089 ms * -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * -2%
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120)	3012.8 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	2895.3 ms * +4%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	2530.7 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

128 GB 的 UFS 2.0 存储空间在这个价位的产品中，无论从大小还是速度来说，都是独一无二的。得益于快速闪存，数据传输得以加速，加载时间也比许多同价位的其他设备更短。

	Teclast T40 HD	Teclast M50 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Huawei MatePad SE	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-32%	-58%	-29%	-55%	-11%	58%
Sequential Read 256KB	688.9	257.8 -63%	249 -64%	277.2 -60%	293.6 -57%	530 ?(286 - 948, n=36) -23%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) 23%
Sequential Write 256KB	188	225.22 20%	83 -56%	210.4 12%	99.5 -47%	215 ?(142.8 - 466, n=36) 14%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 183%
Random Read 4KB	137	91.95 -33%	67.3 -51%	105.1 -23%	61.8 -55%	129.6 ?(65 - 233, n=36) -5%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) 22%
Random Write 4KB	143.8	68.13 -53%	58.8 -59%	78.5 -45%	54 -62%	100.7 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=36) -30%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) 5%

游戏 - 适合简单的游戏

不幸的是，Teclast 平板电脑与GameBench 的软件并不兼容。软件，这意味着我们无法提供任何帧速率。无论如何，你几乎无法以超过 30 帧/秒的速度运行要求苛刻的游戏--大多数游戏甚至不提供这种速度。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器控制游戏的效果很好，也很精确。

No graph data

排放 - 平板电脑几乎不发热

温度

即使在处理器长时间负载的情况下，该设备的外壳也几乎不会发热，而且一点也不明显。

因此，在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 保持稳定和较高的性能也就不足为奇了。

Max. Load

Idle


25.1 °C	29.4 °C	24.5 °C
25.1 °C	26.2 °C	24 °C
25 °C	24.8 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 29.4 °C
Average: 25.3 °C


26.1 °C	31.2 °C	27.2 °C
24.8 °C	26.6 °C	26.3 °C
24.5 °C	25.7 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 26.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.8 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.56)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.86-2.87)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.64 (2.64-2.64)

Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.623 (0.575-0.677)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.783 (0.733-0.822)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.725 (0.703-0.747)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	98.5 (1.11^min - 1.127^max) % +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	97.5 (0.789^min - 0.809^max) % +15%
Huawei MatePad SE	94.2 (0.703^min - 0.747^max) % +11%
Teclast M50 Pro	89.2 (0.733^min - 0.822^max) % +5%
Teclast T40 HD	84.8 (0.575^min - 0.677^max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad SE	99.7 (2.64^min - 2.64^max) % +1%
Teclast M50 Pro	99.6 (2.86^min - 2.87^max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	99.4 (4.34^min - 4.36^max) % +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	99.3 (3.13^min - 3.16^max) % +1%
Teclast T40 HD	98.7 (2.53^min - 2.56^max) %

Legend

Teclast T40 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Teclast M50 Pro UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

Teclast T40 HD 的立体声扬声器音量并不大，在最大音量时，声音会刺得耳朵有点不舒服。

声音似乎有点不准确，但声音回放清晰。歌声也是如此，非常清晰。不过，在播放一些乐器时，声音的精确度还有待提高，但对于休闲聆听来说，扬声器还是可以使用的。

外接耳机或扬声器可通过蓝牙或 3.5 毫米插孔连接。这种连接方式效果极佳，而且平板电脑还可以使用 HiRes 音频编解码器进行无线连接（aptX HD 和 LDAC）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T40 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Teclast 平板电脑拥有强大的续航能力

耗电量

总的来说，Teclast T40 Pro 的耗电量相当低，尤其是在负载情况下耗电量相对较低。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 10 瓦，由于电池容量大，充电时间最长可达 4 小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load	2.9 / 5.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Teclast T40 HD 7200 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		-33%	-36%	-83%	-82%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.1 8%	1.4 -17%	1.9 -58%	1.5 -25%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.4 -8%	1.6 -23%	2.1 -62%	2.3 -77%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.9 -27%	2 -33%	2.5 -67%	2.8 -87%
Load Average *	2.9	5.5 -90%	4.2 -45%	7.6 -162%	6.5 -124%
Load Maximum *	5.4	8 -48%	8.7 -61%	9 -67%	10.7 -98%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T40 HD: Ø3.12 (1.152-5.35)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T40 HD; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.18 (1.955-2.94)

Teclast T40 HD; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.252 (1.165-1.497)

运行时间

它的电池容量高达 7,200 毫安时，续航时间非常长，成功击败了同价位的对比设备。通过 WLAN 上网时，它可以持续使用 15:02 小时；在屏幕熄灭前，您可以从闪存中播放近 18 小时的电影。

如果你喜欢玩游戏，如果附近没有电源插座，在非常高负荷的情况下，你仍然可以获得 4:24 小时的续航时间。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		44h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 24min

	Teclast T40 HD 7200 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-34%	-3%	-14%	-18%
Reader / Idle	2688	1660 -38%	2869 7%	1952 -27%	2009 -25%
H.264	1067	579 -46%	942 -12%	1002 -6%	958 -10%
WiFi v1.3	902	555 -38%	874 -3%	861 -5%	638 -29%
Load	264	233 -12%	250 -5%	213 -19%	249 -6%

Pros

+ 大量快速存储

+ 无 PWM

+ 宽频 L1

+ Android 13 无臃肿软件

+ 几乎不发热

+ 运行时间长

+ 时尚金属外壳

+ 双 SIM 卡蜂窝调制解调器

Cons

- 照相机有强烈的色调...

- ......显示屏也是如此

- SoC 性能一般

- 充电速度慢

- 扭动时有吱吱嘎嘎的声音

- 定位服务一般

评价 - 经济实惠，设备齐全

Teclast T40 HD 的售价仅为 200 多美元，却给人留下了不错的印象：它的扬声器效果不错，运行时间长，支持 Widevine L1，所有这些都让这款平板电脑成为流媒体和电影之夜的最佳伴侣。该设备配备了大量快速存储空间、高分辨率和一定亮度的屏幕，还可以使用蜂窝数据打电话或上网。

即便如此，Teclast T40 HD 还是更喜欢在室内使用：在明亮的日子里，它的屏幕不够亮，扬声器的音量不足以掩盖周围的噪音，定位服务也有点不准确。

它的摄像头可以用来拍摄快照或扫描文件，但正如所有廉价平板电脑一样，你不能指望它能达到昂贵智能手机的画质。它的软件支持也相当简陋，而且保修期只有短短的 12 个月。

时尚的金属外壳和丰富的功能（包括大量快速存储空间和蜂窝调制解调器）都让 Teclast T40 HD 成为同价位产品中的佼佼者。

如果你不太看重电池续航时间，但又想追求更高的性能和更好的音质，那么你应该看看Teclast M50 Pro 。另一方面，Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3) 也支持 LTE，但你必须使用旧版本的Android 。

价格和供应情况

虽然 Teclast T40 HD 还不能在亚马逊上购买，但您可以在这里找到该制造商的其他型号。T40 HD 的售价略高于 200 美元。

Teclast T40 HD - 2023-12-30 12/30/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

80 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 86%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 64%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

91%

Display

73%

Games Performance

9 / 78 → 12%

Application Performance

58 / 92 → 63%

Temperature

97%

Noise

100%

Audio

65 / 91 → 71%

Camera

51 / 85 → 60%

Average

70%

79%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 215 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast T40 HD 平板电脑评测--配备大量快速存储和移动数据的经济型平板电脑

Florian Schmitt, 2024-01- 3 (Update: 2024-01- 3)