对 Teclast T60 Pro 的评价
几年前,Teclast T60 Pro 的某些功能还被认为是奢侈品级别的:别致的金属外壳、4096 级压力的手写笔输入、甚至包括导航功能在内的 LTE 支持。
但在其他方面,你会发现这只是一款售价约 220 美元的平板电脑:其性能在日常使用中尚可,但在执行要求较高的任务时很快就会达到极限。电池续航能力一般,充电时间长。
摄像头比较简陋,显示屏也比较暗。颜色偏蓝,但受 PWM 困扰的用户可以高兴了,因为我们没有发现任何闪烁现象。
如果你的预算不多,或者正在寻找一款设备齐全的第二台平板电脑,你一定要看看 Teclast T60 Pro。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在撰写这篇评论时,您在temu.com 上购买这款平板电脑的价格约为 220 美元。.
规格
外壳和功能 - 带隐藏式天线的金属外壳
Teclast 将 T60 Pro 平板电脑装入金属外壳中,为了更好地接收信号,外壳中实际上没有塑料区域:制造商巧妙地将天线集成到了摄像头模块中。唯一的颜色是太空灰,让人联想到Apple 平板电脑。平板电脑做工整洁,手感良好。
不过,当扭动 12 英寸平板电脑时,可能会产生嘎吱嘎吱的响声。
8 GB 内存和 128 GB 大容量存储是这个价位的标准配置。内存可通过 microSD 读卡器进行扩展,在我们使用参考 microSD Angelbird V60 进行的评测中,读卡器的工作速度一般。因此,您可以存储数据,但不要指望高速传输。
该平板电脑还配备了 GPS,因此您可以确定平板电脑的位置,还可以在汽车上使用它进行导航。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Vale V12X (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=50, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 60 赫兹慢速屏幕
WiFi 5 是最快的 WiFi 标准。该平板电脑的数据传输速率通常可达 370 MBit/s。不过,有时速度会明显下降,尤其是在传输时。
Teclast T60 Pro 甚至配备了蜂窝模块,从而减少了对 WiFi 网络的依赖,这一点非常好。不过,这里可用的频率并不多。
触摸屏对输入的反应良好,但屏幕每秒最多只能显示 60 幅图像。因此,与屏幕速度更快的平板电脑相比,操作速度稍慢。
可以使用有源手写笔;制造商在此提供 Teclast T-Pen,但也支持通用的 USI 2.0 协议。不过,平板电脑上没有磁性存储笔。
此外,也没有用于用户生物识别的指纹传感器。
| Networking | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 - 过时的安全性
Android 15 预装在平板电脑上。Teclast 努力通过侧边栏和双手模式下更容易访问系统菜单来优化操作。不过,与原版Android 相比,并没有太多变化。
安全补丁可追溯到 2025 年 8 月,因此显然已经过时。
没有关于可持续性的进一步信息。包装使用塑料薄膜。
相机 - 几乎无法用于拍照
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Rear camera - plantRear camera - streetRear camera - low light

显示屏 - 偏蓝偏暗
12 英寸显示屏的亮度不是很高:我们测得的最高亮度为 322 cd/m²。这意味着它只适合在阴天或阴凉处的室外使用。
色彩还原也不尽人意:偏蓝。
不过,IPS 屏幕不使用 PWM 进行亮度调光,因此也适合较敏感的用户使用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 322 cd/m²
Contrast: 805:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.03 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
84.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.99
CCT: 9252 K
| Teclast T60 Pro IPS, 2000x1200, 12" | Vale V12X AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 IPS, 1340x800, 8.7" | Teclast Art Pad Pro IPS, 2176x1600, 12.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 21% | 27% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 322 | 393 22% | 453 41% | 291 -10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 309 | 381 23% | 438 42% | 269 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 93 1% | 94 2% | 82 -11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.31 22% | 0.33 17% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 805 | 1461 81% | 882 10% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.03 | 6.5 19% | 6.87 14% | 7.79 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.49 | 9.27 19% | 11.89 -3% | 10.97 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 5 42% | 6.9 20% | 8 7% |
| Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.215 99% | 2.216 99% | 2.007 110% |
| CCT | 9252 70% | 7298 89% | 8458 77% | 8922 73% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
| ↘ 15.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 22.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 使用时间不长
采用联发科 Helio G99该平板电脑使用的是入门级的典型 SoC。它能为简单的日常任务提供足够的动力,但很快就会被更复杂的任务所淹没。即使在菜单中,也不能完全排除卡顿现象。
正如 3DMark 压力测试所示,Teclast T60 Pro 显示了 SoC 的常用性能值,即使在长时间负载后也能保持稳定的性能。长时间负载后,外壳也没有明显发热。
立体声扬声器的音效在同价位产品中还算不错,因此你可以听流行歌曲和其他音乐。要求更高的用户更倾向于使用耳机或外置扬声器,它们可以通过 USB 或蓝牙连接。支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器,包括高保真音频。
8.就电池容量而言,000 毫安时的电池容量相当低;竞争对手有时会提供更高的电池容量。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,11:55 小时的运行时间也相当少。不过,在沙发上躺一天也足够了。不过,由于最大功率只有 15 瓦,充电需要很长时间。
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (422 - 7134, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1165 - 1364, n=27) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (421 - 32525, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1011 - 1340, n=28) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme | |
| Average of class Tablet (89 - 9391, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (322 - 378, n=28) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Average of class Tablet (99 - 11105, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (323 - 366, n=28) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (209 - 211, n=2) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (309 - 313, n=2) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (195 - 199, n=2) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (23.3 - 395, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 92.8, n=16) | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | Vale V12X | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | Teclast Art Pad Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 16% | -26% | 9% | -36% | 60% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 879.6 | 994.2 13% | 925.1 5% | 1007.37 15% | 762 ? -13% | 1852 ? 111% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 754.4 | 914.9 21% | 395.6 -48% | 873.36 16% | 300 ? -60% | 1399 ? 85% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 226.5 | 258.5 14% | 179.5 -21% | 237.46 5% | 154.7 ? -32% | 253 ? 12% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 219.5 | 257.1 17% | 129.9 -41% | 215.52 -2% | 131.1 ? -40% | 288 ? 31% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Teclast T60 Pro | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
Teclast T60 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Vale V12X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Teclast T60 Pro 8000 mAh | Vale V12X 10000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 5100 mAh | Teclast Art Pad Pro 10000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 12% | 22% | -15% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.9 | 13.3 12% | 14.5 22% | 10.1 -15% |
| Load (h) | 3.7 | 4.4 | ||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 32.4 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 19.3 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Teclast T60 Pro
- 01/21/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teclast T60 Pro Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $12.98 GXLYFG 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 2. $19.98 Case for TECLAST T60 Pro 12-... 3. $15.99 Hoibon for TECLAST T60 Table... List Price: 160€ | 553 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 12.00" 2000x1200 194 PPI IPS | |
| Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.90 Case Compatible for VALE V12... 2. $11.90 Case Compatible for VALE V12... 3. $11.90 Case for VALE V12X 12.6-inch... List Price: 449€ | 555 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.60" 2560x1600 240 PPI AMOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $249.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 6GB ... 2. $309.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 8GB ... 3. $253.00 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 5G 1... List Price: 179€ | 335 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI IPS | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $279.99 TECLAST Artpadpro Android 15... 2. $17.99 NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Prote... 3. $19.49 Case for TECLAST ArtPad Pro ... List Price: 350 Euro | 674 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.70" 2176x1600 213 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.























