Notebookcheck Logo
Teclast T60 AI

经济实惠的 12 英寸平板电脑，令人惊喜的附加功能 - Teclast T60 AI 评测

随附输入笔和对开封套。

12 英寸的 Teclast T60 AI 售价不到 200 美元，同时还配备了 90 Hz 显示屏、耳机插孔和立体声扬声器等丰富功能。它还拥有多项 AI 功能，甚至还有 2 个 USB-C 端口，其中一个支持 USB 3.1 Gen 1 和 DisplayPort。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

对 Teclast T60 AI 的评价

如果您正在寻找一款经济实惠的平板电脑用于冲浪和多媒体，那么您可能会喜欢 Teclast T60 AI，尤其是因为它还附带了对开盖和触控笔。这款入门级平板电脑的 12 英寸 IPS 显示屏可容纳大量内容，而且由于采用了桌面模式，可以同时显示多个应用程序。虽然它的 90 Hz 显示屏不是最亮的，但在室内使用仍然完全足够。

average (74%) Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 Tablet - 05/21/2025 - v8
Test device courtesy of Teclast
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

T60 AI 的其他有利之处还包括其良好的功能，如立体声扬声器、128 GB 存储空间、microSD 卡插槽、3.5 毫米插孔，甚至还有两个 USB-C 端口，其中一个支持快速 USB 3.1 Gen 1，甚至还有 DisplayPort。除了 AI 视频升频之外，这款平板电脑的 AI 功能并不出众，其效果令人惊讶。

缺点T60 AI 的运行时间不长，充电需要一段时间，而且既没有 GPS、指纹传感器，也没有使用自拍摄像头进行面部识别。此外，它的摄像头也很一般，更新交付也不明确。游戏运行时会受到一些限制，如果你非常重视流畅的操作，那么你会更喜欢性能更强大的竞争对手的设备，如Honor Pad 或小米红米 Pad Pro。

Pros

+ DRM Widevine L1
+ 库存Android
+ 90 Hz 大显示屏
+ 带窗口显示的桌面模式
+ 良好的 AI 视频升级
+ 带 DisplayPort 的 USB-C 3.1 Gen 1
+ 几乎不发热
+ 无 PWM 闪烁
+ 附带对开盖和笔

Cons

- 无 GPS
- 显示屏暗淡，色彩不准确
- 无指纹传感器
- 无面部识别功能
- 相机性能一般
- 电池续航时间低于平均水平
- 更新交付不明确

价格和供应情况

Teclast T60 AI 售价 169 美元。您可以通过网站查看 Teclast 的官方零售商。.

Teclast T60 AI 的主要数据读起来很有希望。不到 200 美元的价格，就能买到一款金属外壳的 12 英寸平板电脑，拥有 2K 分辨率、90 Hz 刷新率和 128 GB 存储空间。它还配备了Android 15 和一系列人工智能功能，这也是这款平板电脑的名字由来。

其 全志 A733T60 AI 采用了与其姊妹机型 Teclast P50 AI 相同的八核 SoC。 Teclast P50 AI在我们的测试中表现出色。在接下来的评测中，我们将看看它的 12 英寸同类产品是否也能获得我们的推荐。

规格

Teclast T60 AI (T Series)
Processor
Allwinner A733 9 x
Graphics adapter
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.97 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, typical brightness 330 nits, touch sampling rate up to 180 Hz, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 283 x 178.2
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10W charging
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, LED flash, AI secondary lens
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, 10W charger (5V/2A), pen, folio cover, user manual, 24 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Limited, fanless
Weight
624 g, Power Supply: 38 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - Teclast T60 AI 采用酒红色金属外壳

Teclast 将 T60 AI 包装在一个金属外壳内，外壳采用酒红色，背面是八角形的金色摄像头边框。

外壳的圆角和边缘做工精良，但不经意间就会凹陷下去，有时甚至只是轻轻一碰就会发出明显的吱吱声。即便如此，这款平板电脑还是足够坚固，适合日常使用。同样，它也没有获得 IP 认证。

T60 AI 的重量为 624 克，略高于同等尺寸的竞争对手，如 Honor Pad 9和 小米红米 Pad Pro相比，T60 AI 的重量为 624 克，略高于同尺寸的竞争对手，如 Pad 9 和小米红米 Pad Pro，但仍然不会让人感觉太重，而且机身纤薄，高度仅为 8.4 毫米。它的显示屏边框四边宽约一厘米，可以让平板电脑稳稳地握在手中，而不会在其 IPS 显示屏上出现输入错误。

Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

尺寸比较

❌
283 mm 178.2 mm 8.4 mm 624 g282 mm 178 mm 8 mm 621 g280 mm 181.85 mm 7.52 mm 571 g278.27 mm 180.11 mm 6.96 mm 555 g268.7 mm 168.96 mm 7.15 mm 520 g257.1 mm 168.7 mm 6.9 mm 480 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 2x USB-C，支持 DisplayPort

Teclast 为其平板电脑配备了 6GB LPDDR5 内存和 128GB UFS 3.1 存储空间。内存可通过虚拟内存扩展增加到 16 GB，但这并没有什么用处，因为平板电脑只能在速度更慢的 UFS 存储中创建一个交换文件。

另一方面，T60 AI 在接口方面有更多优势，除了耳机插孔和可容纳最大 1 TB 存储卡的 microSD 读卡器外，该平板电脑还配备了两个支持 OTG 的 USB-C 接口。上方的 USB-C 端口以 USB 2.0 的速度工作，主要用作充电端口。

下方的 USB 端口支持速度更快的 USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 数据传输（标称速度为 5 GBit/s），同时还具有 DisplayPort 输出功能。这样，Teclast 平板电脑就可以将其屏幕内容镜像到显示器或便携式显示器上，例如，在我们的测试过程中就能正常工作。

左：3.5 毫米耳机插孔、USB-C 2.0、microSD 插槽、USB-C 3.1 Gen 1（带 DisplayPort
左：3.5 毫米耳机插孔、USB-C 2.0、microSD 插槽、USB-C 3.1 Gen 1（带 DisplayPort
右：无连接
右：无连接
顶部：麦克风、音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部：麦克风、音量摇杆、电源按钮
底部：扬声器
底部：扬声器

microSD 读卡器

在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡时，平板电脑读卡器的运行速度令人满意。在跨平台磁盘测试和复制测试中，竞争对手的速度明显更快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
42.3 MB/s +58%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years)
34.8 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird V60)
34.1 MB/s +27%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 (Angelbird V60)
32.9 MB/s +23%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733 (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.1 (21.2-39)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40 (31.2-49.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (30.1-48.6)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø52.7 (24.8-58.4)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (33.8-88)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.3 (24.3-88.6)

软件 -Android 15，人工智能功能和桌面模式

Teclast T60 AI 运行Android 15。Teclast 操作系统与Android 的标准版基本相同，因此用户无需适应新的用户界面。Teclast T60 AI 包括 PC 模式，这是一种专为使用鼠标和键盘而设计的特殊桌面模式。

使用 PC 模式时，应用程序会在窗口中启动，并可在桌面上随意移动。我们在测试中安装的《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact 》这两款游戏甚至可以在各自的窗口中并行运行。不过，这两款游戏随后就无法正常控制了。

迄今为止，人工智能功能一直是廉价平板电脑的一大例外。尽管如此，T60 AI 还是提供了少量人工智能功能。例如，这款 12 英寸平板电脑可以改善视频图像质量，识别手势和用户的不良姿势。

将视频放大到平板电脑的原生分辨率后，效果实际上会好很多，你可以同时显示原始视频，直观地感受两者之间的差别。支持 DRM Widevine L1，因此您可以高清质量观看受拷贝保护的视频流。

在我们的测试中，T60 AI 会迅速通过弹出式窗口警告用户姿势不正确，而且它对手势的反应大多比较稳定。不过，由于自拍相机必须先识别出你的手，所以总是要花费一些时间。例如，你可以举起手，然后转动手掌发出返回指令。另一方面，平板电脑在向上或向下滑动滚动时的表现也很顽固：几乎总是无动于衷。

Teclast 没有提供任何关于 T60 AI 的操作系统升级和安全更新可用多长时间以及提供频率的信息。因此，购买者应做好支持期可能很短的准备。在测试时，最新的Android 安全补丁是从 3 月 1 日开始的，因此仍然是相对最新的。

Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

可持续性

Teclast 并不重视可持续发展，至少在表面上是这样。其网站上没有任何关于平板电脑碳足迹或制造商环保努力的信息。T60 AI 用塑料薄膜包裹，彩色包装上也没有显示所使用油墨的成分。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 不带 GPS 的 Teclast T60 AI

T60 AI 支持蓝牙 5.4 和 WiFi 6，但没有 GPS 或 NFC 模块。此外，Teclast 没有为其 12 英寸平板电脑提供蜂窝网络版本。

Teclast 平板电脑采用了最新的 WiFi 标准，即 WiFi 6，但在实际使用中，由于不能使用 6 GHz 频段，你不会注意到太多。当连接到我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 时，其传输速率仅达到 WiFi 5 的水平，而且不是特别稳定。

尽管如此，在这个价位的竞争产品中，你通常不会得到更多。值得称道的例外是现在非常实惠的 小米红米 Pad Pro显示了使用 5 GHz 频段的 WiFi 6 的速度有多快。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=142)
851 MBit/s +152%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1656, n=86, last 2 years)
554 MBit/s +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
528 (438min - 633max) MBit/s +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (356min - 387max) MBit/s +9%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (184min - 389max) MBit/s +8%
Teclast T60 AI
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
338 (242min - 371max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
315 (223min - 362max) MBit/s -7%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
263 (212min - 276max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1596 (1524min - 1625max) MBit/s +390%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=140)
824 MBit/s +153%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1723, n=86, last 2 years)
555 MBit/s +70%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (363min - 373max) MBit/s +13%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
352 (125min - 381max) MBit/s +8%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (171min - 354max) MBit/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (172min - 350max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast T60 AI
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
326 (177min - 387max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (242-371)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)
Teclast T60 AI 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (177-387)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

相机 - 仅适用于快照

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

T60 AI 的自拍摄像头集成在上边框中央，分辨率为 500 万像素，成像质量尚可，至少在光线条件良好的情况下还可以。不过，总的来说，它只能捕捉到很少的细节，图像也不是特别清晰。

背面的 1300 万像素主摄像头也没好到哪里去。它适合偶尔拍摄快照、文件照片或扫描二维码。不过，如果你喜欢在平板电脑上拍照，T60 AI 可能不会让你满意。

使用其主摄像头拍摄的照片有时光线均匀，但往往显得太亮，如第一张示例图片所示。总的来说，照片的动态范围很小，几乎没有清晰度，背景噪点也很严重。相机的亮度调节和自动对焦功能运行缓慢。此外，后者在搜索对焦区域时会产生明显的抽风效果。弱光条件下，相机很快就会不堪重负。

平板电脑最高可录制每秒 30 帧的 1080p 视频。其录制质量与照片不相上下。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylight photoLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下，该设备的主摄像头并不能非常准确地匹配 ColorChecker 的参考颜色或灰度级。即使在最佳照明条件下，它也无法清晰地捕捉测试图。在 1 勒克斯的光线下，它几乎完全消失在黑暗中。

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 AI: 13.77 ∆E min: 7.89 - max: 19 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 AI: 47.6 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - T60 AI 提供 12 个月的保修服务

Teclast T60 AI 随附 10 瓦电源适配器（5V/2A）、USB-C 数据线、快速入门指南和保修卡。此外，还附带了一个对开盖和一支触控笔。Teclast 没有为其平板电脑提供任何特殊配件。

Teclast T60 AI 享有 12 个月的标准保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 配备触控笔的 Teclast 平板电脑

T60 AI 的 2K 屏幕每秒扫描次数高达 180 次，几乎总能快速、可靠地处理输入，并以 90 Hz 的刷新率流畅运行。不过，有时点击触摸屏的时间似乎太短，这意味着输入没有被记录下来，也不会发生任何操作。

例如，在测试过程中，我们经常发现 T60 AI 只有在重复输入并用手指或附带的触控笔按压图标稍长时间后才能启动应用程序。而物理按键则运行得非常完美。它们稳固地固定在外壳中，易于触摸，按压点清晰。

触控笔可能会引起一些混淆，因为它看起来像一支圆珠笔，而且其尖头部分实际上包含一支普通的圆珠笔芯，但带有软橡胶附件的钝头部分则用于在显示屏上输入。

使用 Teclast 平板电脑的对开盖可以安全地运输平板电脑，对开盖也包含在供货范围内。由三部分组成的保护盖可用作支架，将 T60 AI 固定在 70 度左右的角度。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器，也没有通过自拍摄像头进行面部识别，因此不提供生物识别认证选项。访问 T60 AI 只能通过 PIN、图案或密码进行保护。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 90 Hz 无 PWM IPS 屏幕

子像素
子像素

T60 AI 的像素密度为 195 PPI，采用 2000 x 1200 像素的 IPS 面板，图像清晰度足够高。不过，如果仔细观察，可以看到像素结构。

在显示白色背景时，Teclast 平板电脑的平均亮度为 327 cd/m²，足以满足室内使用要求。在图像亮部和暗部分布均匀的情况下（APL18 测量），亮度最高可达 365 cd/m²。该平板电脑不支持 HDR。

IPS 屏幕不使用 PWM，因此 T60 AI 适合对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户。

310
cd/m²		328
cd/m²		342
cd/m²
320
cd/m²		343
cd/m²		334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²		321
cd/m²		340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 326.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 1715:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 9.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
91% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.197
Teclast T60 AI
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"		Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"		Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"		Teclast T60 Plus
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 12"		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen
30%
38%
10%
13%
20%
Brightness middle
343
613
79%
473
38%
493
44%
487
42%
513
50%
Brightness
327
570
74%
449
37%
460
41%
472
44%
480
47%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
87
-2%
90
1%
92
3%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.2
0.4
-100%
0.25
-25%
0.35
-75%
0.34
-70%
0.4
-100%
Contrast
1715
1533
-11%
1892
10%
1409
-18%
1432
-17%
1283
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.1
2.7
67%
1.56
81%
6
26%
6.16
24%
2.82
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.45
5.1
75%
3.8
81%
11.7
43%
10.96
46%
8.83
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.5
3.7
61%
1.3
86%
8.2
14%
6.4
33%
2.9
69%
Gamma
2.197 100%
2.3 96%
2.178 101%
2.21 100%
2.38 92%
2.265 97%
CCT
9376 69%
6763 96%
6726 97%
9131 71%
8212 79%
7189 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8419 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

得益于 0.2 cd/m² 的低黑值，IPS 显示屏实现了 1715:1 的良好对比度，但遗憾的是，它的色彩显示并不特别准确。我们测得的数值远高于理想范围（Delta-E < 3），而且 9376 K 的高色温使显示屏偏蓝。

色彩精度（色彩模式自然）
色彩精度（色彩模式自然）
灰度（色彩模式自然）
灰度（色彩模式自然）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式自然）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式自然）
sRGB 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）
sRGB 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）
DCI-P3 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）
DCI-P3 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）
AdobeRGB 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）
AdobeRGB 色彩空间（色彩模式自然）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
30.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.5 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.9 ms rise
↘ 20.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

这款平板电脑的可视角度稳定的 IPS 屏幕只在有限的范围内适合户外使用。由于亮度较低，即使在阴凉处有时也难以阅读。该显示屏无法充分补偿强光反射或阳光直射。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - Teclast T60 AI 与全志 A733

虽然 全志 A733虽然没有把 T60 AI 变成一匹赛马，但它仍然为其提供了稳定的性能。在日常使用中，这通常体现在流畅的操作上，无论是在社交媒体上，还是在网上冲浪和观看视频时，它都足以胜任。然而，同价位的竞争对手，如 Honor Pad 9和 小米红米 Pad Pro的性能要好得多。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=88, last 2 years)
1220 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1007 Points +60%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
944 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +46%
Average Allwinner A733
  (628 - 633, n=2)
631 Points 0%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
628 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
432 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
412 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=88, last 2 years)
3905 Points +163%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2773 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2616 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +34%
Average Allwinner A733
  (1486 - 1505, n=2)
1496 Points +1%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1486 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1425 Points -4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1104 Points -26%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 2224, n=77, last 2 years)
818 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
774 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
725 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
482 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
350 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 10522, n=77, last 2 years)
3042 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2763 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2744 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
1320 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1288 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=53, last 2 years)
914699 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
612145 Points +85%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
490448 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
422144 Points +28%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
330453 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
329731 Points 0%
Average Allwinner A733
  (319869 - 330453, n=2)
325161 Points -2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
250503 Points -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
12802 Points +76%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11693 Points +61%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=78, last 2 years)
10804 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8752 Points +20%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
7383 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
7268 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (7084 - 7268, n=2)
7176 Points -1%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=66, last 2 years)
830 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
747 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
689 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
578 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
419 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
406 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
319 Points
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=62, last 2 years)
4653 Points +121%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4233 Points +101%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4151 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2383 Points +13%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2172 Points +3%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
2108 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1937 - 2108, n=2)
2023 Points -4%
System
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10083 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
9324 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=62, last 2 years)
7702 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7626 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5259 Points +10%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
4789 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (4614 - 4789, n=2)
4702 Points -2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3901 Points -19%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=62, last 2 years)
5409 Points +78%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
3222 Points +6%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
3046 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (2602 - 3046, n=2)
2824 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2554 Points -16%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2412 Points -21%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=62, last 2 years)
10818 Points +813%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5783 Points +388%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4622 Points +290%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4337 Points +266%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2243 Points +89%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1928 Points +63%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1185 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1067 - 1185, n=2)
1126 Points -5%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=62, last 2 years)
1336 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1307 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1297 Points +13%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1192 Points +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1143 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1099 - 1143, n=2)
1121 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1071 Points -6%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=62, last 2 years)
12103 Points +207%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
7236 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
7223 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5687 Points +44%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4759 Points +21%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
3937 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3820 Points -3%
Average Allwinner A733
  (3600 - 3937, n=2)
3769 Points -4%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
38990 Points +15071%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=54, last 2 years)
6977 Points +2615%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
644 Points +151%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
498 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
429 Points +67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
258 Points 0%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
257 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (252 - 257, n=2)
255 Points -1%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
740 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
743 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1545 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)
1944 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
456 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 12784, n=11, last 2 years)
2775 Points +2102%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
126 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
126 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
113 Points -10%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
99.7 Points -21%

在 GPU 测试中，Teclast 平板电脑几乎总是处于落后位置。图形性能 IMG BXM-4-64 MC1的图形性能 全志 A733只能流畅地显示非常简单的图形基准。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points +528%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +185%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
183 Points +48%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points +552%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +411%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +198%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +541%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +413%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +158%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
753 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
583 Points +25%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
468 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2954 Points +541%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +413%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +164%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points +60%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
598 Points +30%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
461 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +15%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2966 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2499 Points -16%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2012 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5420 Points +719%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +352%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1325 Points +100%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1254 Points +89%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
662 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4894 Points +512%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +284%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1479 Points +85%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1367 Points +71%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
800 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +273%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +259%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +168%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps +82%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps +408%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +338%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +288%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps +83%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +221%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps +200%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +150%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +71%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps +380%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +313%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +213%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +67%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +259%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +215%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +161%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +63%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps +441%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +369%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +247%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +63%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.8 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +400%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +295%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps +189%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps +105%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3.8 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +625%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +475%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +375%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps +140%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +319%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +255%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +203%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps +61%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3.1 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +550%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +460%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +310%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps +55%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +304%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +246%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +188%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps +44%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +507%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +293%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps +41%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.6 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +628%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +493%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +344%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +73%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0.81 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%

浏览器基准测试结果显示，T60 AI 的性能并不特别出色。尽管如此，你仍然可以在平板电脑上快速上网，很少需要等待页面完全加载完毕。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
129.1 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +70%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +55%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
66.048 Points +16%
Average Allwinner A733 (56.9 - 67.6, n=2)
62.3 Points +10%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
56.868 Points
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
47.986 Points -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=66, last 2 years)
154.9 runs/min +244%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
86.6 runs/min +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +59%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
61.9 runs/min +38%
Average Allwinner A733 (45 - 55.8, n=2)
50.4 runs/min +12%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
45 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=44, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +360%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min +124%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
4.74 runs/min +58%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
3.7 runs/min +23%
Average Allwinner A733 (3 - 3.75, n=2)
3.38 runs/min +13%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
3.13 runs/min +4%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
3 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=73, last 2 years)
118.9 Points +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +88%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
68 Points +19%
Average Allwinner A733 (57 - 66, n=2)
61.5 Points +8%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
57 Points
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
54 Points -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=96, last 2 years)
34979 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points +92%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +61%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
18158 Points
Average Allwinner A733 (17241 - 18158, n=2)
17700 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
16498 Points -9%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
15102 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=82, last 2 years)
3274 ms * -26%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
2743.4 ms * -5%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
2603.5 ms *
Average Allwinner A733 (2376 - 2604, n=2)
2490 ms * +4%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
2459.4 ms * +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +48%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

据 Teclast 称，T60 AI 采用了 UFS 3.1 存储技术。尽管如此，它在这款平板电脑中的工作效率并不高，读写速度仅达到 UFS 2.2 的水平。不过，这并不一定是件坏事，因为许多其他廉价平板电脑只使用速度明显较慢的 eMMC 闪存。

Teclast T60 AIHonor Pad 9Lenovo Tab K11 PlusSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast T60 PlusXiaomi Redmi Pad ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
149%
86%
7%
-66%
62%
86%
83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1106.24
1921.34
74%
1003.25
-9%
485.96
-56%
296.42
-73%
844.9
-24%
1578 ?(529 - 3134, n=63)
43%
1253 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=78, last 2 years)
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
252.07
1222.83
385%
876.29
248%
476.37
89%
193.23
-23%
705.3
180%
736 ?(233 - 1332, n=63)
192%
882 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=78, last 2 years)
250%
Random Read 4KB
228.09
256.06
12%
244.03
7%
130.67
-43%
49.58
-78%
215.5
-6%
242 ?(126.2 - 428, n=63)
6%
206 ?(18.4 - 474, n=78, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
117.81
266.17
126%
232.16
97%
162.9
38%
13.21
-89%
231.4
96%
238 ?(61.8 - 503, n=63)
102%
212 ?(8.23 - 668, n=78, last 2 years)
80%

游戏 - 很少能顺利运行

我们使用Gamebench和一小部分游戏进行的测试表明，T60 AI 可以非常流畅地运行图形较为简单的游戏。在高清设置下，《PUBG Mobile》以相对稳定的每秒 30 帧运行，不过帧率确实有所下降。

另一方面，《源氏冲击》玩起来毫无乐趣可言。这款对图形要求极高的冒险角色扮演游戏平均每秒只能运行 17 帧，即使在最低细节级别也是如此。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.6.0_32604286_32602175: Ø17.2 (11-22)
Teclast T60 AI; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 5.6.0_32604286_32602175: Ø10.2 (6-14)
Teclast T60 AI; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.8.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Teclast T60 AI; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø29.8 (16-31)

排放 - 带立体声扬声器的 T60 AI

温度

Teclast 平板电脑在运行过程中始终保持低温，即使在使用 Burnout 基准测试进行了一小时的最大负载后，温度也没有超过温升。SoC 的表现同样平平。3DMark 压力测试表明，在负载情况下，它的性能几乎没有降低。

Max. Load
 30.9 °C30.8 °C26 °C 
 35.2 °C26.8 °C26.5 °C 
 30.5 °C26.5 °C26.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 28.8 °C
26.5 °C26.9 °C28.2 °C
27.2 °C29.7 °C34.6 °C
27.4 °C27.6 °C33 °C
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 29 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +2%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % 0%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.5 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
%
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.725 (0.717-0.735)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.758 (0.748-0.766)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.146 (1.141-1.149)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.78 (2.78-2.79)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.56 (3.55-3.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.44 (4.43-4.45)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.81 (2.81-2.81)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.49 (3.49-3.49)
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

发言人

T60 AI 的机箱底部配备了立体声扬声器。在频率图中，中音最为突出，而混音中听不到低音。总的来说，它的音质在这个价位的产品中还算可以。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔和蓝牙 5.4 与平板电脑连接。可用的蓝牙编解码器有 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.8442541.837.63128.429.64028.830.95032.733632625.68018.321.710022.925.312524.226.81602037.820018.443.325015.24831513.854.140013.155.850015.663.66302372.580020.272.6100016.471.6125013.872.7160014.571.6200015.172.5250014.573.231501978.5400019.377.650002470.6630019.967.1800024.172.91000018.869.31250017.856.21600017.343.9SPL31.685.5N1.562.2median 18.4median 69.3Delta2.910.628.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T60 AISamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T60 AI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 12 英寸平板电脑续航时间短

耗电量

使用随附的电源适配器，T60 AI 的 8000 毫安时电池可在约 4 小时内充满。在功耗方面，这款平板电脑在我们的测试中表现并不明显，空闲模式下的功耗略低于对比设备。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 6.6 / 11.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T60 AI
8000 mAh		Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh		Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh		Average Allwinner A733
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-134%
28%
-49%
-11%
-11%
0%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.1
31%
1
37%
1.8
-13%
1.7
-6%
1.6 ?(n=1)
-0%
1.762 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=73, last 2 years)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.9
8.39
-342%
1.3
32%
4.76
-151%
2.2
-16%
2.2
-16%
1.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
3.74 ?(1 - 9.2, n=73, last 2 years)
-97%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
8.46
-253%
1.6
33%
4.79
-100%
2.9
-21%
2.9
-21%
2.4 ?(n=1)
-0%
4.22 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=73, last 2 years)
-76%
Load Average *
6.6
11.65
-77%
4.4
33%
9.52
-44%
6.7
-2%
5.8
12%
6.6 ?(n=1)
-0%
9.46 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=73, last 2 years)
-43%
Load Maximum *
11.1
11.67
-5%
9.8
12%
9.92
11%
11.4
-3%
13.9
-25%
11.1 ?(n=1)
-0%
13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=73, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.87 (2.36-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.65 (5.85-14.8)
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.809 (1.553-2.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (4.22-4.64)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.57 (6.35-6.93)
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.809 (1.553-2.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

运行时间

尽管 T60 AI 配备了 8000 毫安时电池和性能稍弱的处理器，但其运行时间并不理想。在屏幕亮度调节到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，它可以连续播放视频约 10 小时，模拟网上冲浪 9:35 小时。在这方面，一些竞争对手的表现要好得多。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9+和 小米红米 Pad Pro尤为突出。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Teclast T60 AI
8000 mAh		Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh		Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
24%
49%
2%
60%
Reader / Idle
1177
1517
29%
2275
93%
1074
-9%
2236
90%
H.264
604
727
20%
800
32%
685
13%
1052
74%
WiFi v1.3
575
661
15%
734
28%
920
60%
667
16%
924
61%
Load
217
260
20%
243
12%
192
-12%
245
13%

Notebookcheck 总评分

12 英寸 Teclast T60 AI 是一款价格低廉、设备齐全的入门级平板电脑，配备 90 Hz 显示屏，性能稳定，足以满足多媒体使用需求。不过，它的电池续航时间低于平均水平，充电时间较长，而且更新供应不明确。

Teclast T60 AI - 05/21/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
76 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
64 / 80 → 79%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
45 / 69 → 65%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
88%
Display
72%
Games Performance
2 / 65 → 3%
Application Performance
44 / 92 → 48%
AI Performance
7%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
45 / 90 → 50%
Average
52%
74%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
95.2%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 31.3%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 经济实惠的 12 英寸平板电脑，令人惊喜的附加功能 - Teclast T60 AI 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-05-25 (Update: 2025-05-25)