Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast M50 评测 - 带有移动互联网、电话功能和大量存储空间的平板电脑

少即是好 Teclast M50 既没有高端性能,也没有顶级功能--它是一款价格相对实惠的平板电脑,却能满足日常使用的一切需求。此外,它甚至还配备了许多额外功能,如移动数据、大量存储空间和立体声扬声器。
ARM Android Tablet
Teclast M50
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
6 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 149 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (shared), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity, hall
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 238 x 158
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
460 g
Price
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Storage
Size
Resolution
Price from
79.3 %
04/2024
Teclast M50
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
460 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"1280x800
84.1 %
02/2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"1340x800
80.4 %
01/2024
Blackview Tab 80
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
484 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"1280x800
75.2 %
02/2024
Teclast P26T
A523, Mali-G57 MP1
511 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"1280x800

外壳和连接性 - 带有弱点的金属外壳

Teclast M50 的金属外壳边缘经过抛光处理,看起来很不错,与稍贵一些的平板电脑相比也毫不逊色。不过,平板电脑不宜过度扭曲或按压,否则会在屏幕液晶上形成微小的压痕,屏幕单元和后盖也会轻微移位并开裂。平板电脑重 460 克,易于握持,既不会太重也不会太轻。

屏幕周围的边框足够纤薄,使平板电脑看起来相当现代,而且还能防止你经常误触触摸屏。

这款平板电脑配备了 6GB RAM 和 128GB 大容量存储空间,因此,如果你喜欢同时运行多个应用程序并在平板电脑上存储大量数据,那么这款设备一定能满足你的需求。它配备了用于音频设备的 3.5 毫米插孔和 2 个 SIM 卡插槽。但不支持 eSIM 卡。

如果你想使用 microSD 卡扩展平板电脑的存储空间,你将不得不放弃两个 SIM 卡插槽中的一个。如果您想在外置存储卡上存储数据,您可以期待平均的数据传输速率,我们使用 Angelbird V60 作为参考卡进行的测试证实了这一点。

尺寸比较

245.8 mm 153.4 mm 10.2 mm 511 g241 mm 156 mm 7.5 mm 484 g238 mm 158 mm 8 mm 460 g211 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 332 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
48.7 MB/s +60%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=60, last 2 years)
31.7 MB/s +4%
Teclast M50
  (Angelbird V60)
30.5 MB/s
Blackview Tab 80
  (Angelbird V60)
26.6 MB/s -13%
Teclast P26T
  (Angelbird V60)
25.3 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.9 (17.9-43.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.8 (29.5-49.9)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.2 (18.7-44.8)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.8 (20.9-37.1)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (35.7-82.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (41.4-80.6)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77 (38.6-86.6)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.1 (29.5-56.4)

通信、软件和操作 - 稳定的无线局域网

作为平板电脑最快的无线局域网标准,支持 WiFi 5。对于一款价格低廉的平板电脑来说,数据传输速率大约为 300 - 350 MBit/s。这足以充分利用许多互联网连接;平板电脑的传输速率太慢,无法使用千兆线路。

您也可以使用蜂窝连接上网;在中欧地区,所有必要的频率都可以使用,这也是本次测试的进行地。不过,如果你经常出差,就需要提前研究一下能否在目的地国家访问网络,因为那里不支持那么多的 LTE 频段。

尽管 Teclast 宣称该平板电脑支持Android 14:但Android 13 仍安装在我们的测试设备上,无法更新。鉴于其过时的安全补丁(测试时为 2023 年 9 月),更新也是必要的。

支持 Widevine L1,因此可以通过所有主要平台观看高清流媒体内容。

触摸屏可以精确操作到边边角角。虽然没有指纹传感器,但可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。这在黑暗环境中也能正常工作,因为屏幕提供了足够的识别光线。平板电脑解锁迅速而准确。不过,由于该系统只能扫描二维图像,因此存在一定的陌生人欺骗系统的风险。

Networking
Teclast M50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
353 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
302 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
368 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview Tab 80
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
47.8 (min: 32) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
44.1 (min: 27) MBit/s ∼12%
Teclast P26T
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
124 (min: 99) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
70.3 (min: 2) MBit/s ∼19%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Teclast M50; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (240-309)
Teclast M50; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (331-359)

摄像头 - 更多的应急解决方案

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

平板电脑的主摄像头采用 1300 万像素传感器。拍摄出来的图像动态感不强,要么非常亮且曝光过度,要么非常暗且细节很少。摄像头的总体图像清晰度也很差。

在光线非常暗的情况下,你不得不忍受较差的图像表现,甚至是全黑的图像。

这款相机可以在正常光线条件下拍摄快照,当然也可以用于扫描二维码或记录情况。不过,摄影爱好者很难对图像感到满意。

喜欢录制动态图像的用户可以高达 1,080p 和 30fps 的速度进行录制。不过,平板电脑的亮度调节和自动对焦响应速度相当慢,即使在光线稍差的情况下,图像噪点也清晰可见。

设备正面还有一个 500 万像素的自拍摄像头。拍出来的照片还可以,但不应该放大,否则你会看到很多模糊的区域和非常模糊的细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast M50: 8.56 ∆E min: 1.83 - max: 13.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast M50: 46.71 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 93.69 ∆E

显示屏 - 分辨率较低,但亮度尚可

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

在这个价位的平板电脑中,很少能找到超过 1280 x 800 像素的屏幕。即使是 Teclast M50 的 10.1 英寸屏幕也无法提供更多。它的最大亮度平均为 369 cd/m²,虽然还算不错,但还不如 三星Galaxy Tab A9Blackview Tab 80.

由于黑度较高,屏幕的对比度很低,屏幕上显示的内容有时会显得有些暗淡。总的来说,屏幕上的内容偏蓝,色彩描绘不够准确。

我们没有测量到任何 PWM,因此即使是敏感的人使用这款平板电脑也不会有任何问题。

352
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 392 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 368.7 cd/m² Minimum: 13.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 824:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
79.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.055
Teclast M50
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.70
Blackview Tab 80
LCD, 1280x800, 10.10
Teclast P26T
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Response Times
-10%
36%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
69 ?(40.6, 28.4)
52.61 ?(24.38, 28.23)
24%
32.8 ?(16.3, 16.5)
52%
60.2 ?(33.7, 26.5)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
24.2 ?(12.4, 11.8)
34.71 ?(19.91, 14.8)
-43%
19.5 ?(10.5, 9)
19%
25.7 ?(12.6, 13.1)
-6%
PWM Frequency
Screen
29%
25%
-19%
Brightness middle
371
486
31%
425
15%
248
-33%
Brightness
369
462
25%
423
15%
236
-36%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
83
-5%
81
-7%
Black Level *
0.45
0.35
22%
0.4
11%
0.4
11%
Contrast
824
1389
69%
1063
29%
620
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.46
6.2
17%
5.11
32%
8.62
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.5
10.4
37%
9.8
41%
17.81
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.4
5.7
23%
2.8
62%
10.1
-36%
Gamma
2.055 107%
2.12 104%
2.183 101%
2.438 90%
CCT
8423 77%
7911 82%
7136 91%
10183 64%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 21%
31% / 27%
-8% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 11.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 40.6 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 适合日常使用

产品 Unisoc T606Teclast 经常使用它,在该制造商的许多其他平板电脑中也能找到它的身影。不过,即使对于这个价位的产品来说,它的速度也只是刚刚够用。同时打开多个应用程序、执行更复杂的任务或在较大的计算过程中调整音量往往会给平板电脑带来挑战。

在网上冲浪时,Teclast 设备的速度被证明是相当快的。不过,在大型网站上浏览图片往往需要等待较长时间。

如果你只执行简单的任务,那么这款平板电脑的速度足以满足日常使用。不过,Teclast 本可以在存储方面多下功夫:事实证明,这款平板电脑的 eMMC 闪存非常慢,在加载时间和数据传输方面是个瓶颈。

该平板电脑的外壳仅有轻微发热,这意味着用户即使长时间使用也不会感觉到发热。平板电脑的性能也不会因此受到影响,3DMark 压力测试就证明了这一点。

Teclast M50 的两侧各有一个扬声器,因此可以实现立体声音效。在最大音量下,扬声器听起来高音很重,但如果稍稍降低音量,声音就会变得更加饱满。对于较小的房间,音量也完全足够。支持无线声音传输所需的所有蓝牙音频编解码器,甚至还有一些高保真音频选项,如 aptX HD 和 LDAC。如果您喜欢连接有线耳机,可以使用平板电脑的 3.5 毫米音频插孔。

该设备的电池平均容量为 6,000 mAh。因此,我们的测试设备在无线局域网测试中持续了 12:22 小时。在日常生活中,这意味着你通常可以在家里的客厅用平板电脑度过雨天,而无需充电。如果您确实需要补充电量,平板电脑也需要一些时间:因为最多只能使用 10 瓦的充电功率,所以电池需要 4 个小时才能再次充满电。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)
812 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points +94%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
380 Points
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
377 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T606
  (371 - 380, n=8)
376 Points -1%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
227 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)
2287 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points +49%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1386 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (1285 - 1482, n=8)
1374 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1298 Points -6%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
854 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
565 Points +83%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
309 Points 0%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
309 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (273 - 313, n=16)
307 Points -1%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
167 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1981 Points +52%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1305 Points
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1245 Points -5%
Average UNISOC T606
  (708 - 1324, n=16)
1199 Points -8%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
778 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points +23%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +18%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
7383 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (6637 - 8303, n=16)
7294 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7178 Points -3%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5224 Points -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)
3212 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2543 Points +160%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1029 Points +5%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
989 Points +1%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
979 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (959 - 989, n=15)
974 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3908 Points +371%
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)
3812 Points +360%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
942 Points +14%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
829 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (814 - 834, n=15)
824 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
822 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)
3237 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3102 Points +17%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2659 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (2484 - 2697, n=15)
2623 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2593 Points -2%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1517 Points -43%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1631 Points +283%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1256 Points +195%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
508 Points +19%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
432 Points +1%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
426 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (394 - 432, n=15)
414 Points -3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)
2922 Points +594%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1225 Points +191%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
500 Points +19%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
424 Points +1%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
421 Points
Average UNISOC T606
  (392 - 424, n=15)
411 Points -2%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 6919, n=66, last 2 years)
837 Points +840%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
330 Points +271%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
140 Points +57%
Average UNISOC T606
  (85 - 118, n=15)
105.3 Points +18%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
101 Points +13%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
89 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 6909, n=64, last 2 years)
887 Points +796%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
345 Points +248%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
136 Points +37%
Average UNISOC T606
  (99 - 121, n=14)
107.4 Points +8%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
104 Points +5%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
99 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
26 fps +136%
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +93%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
13 fps +18%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
11 fps 0%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
11 fps
Average UNISOC T606
  (5.1 - 11, n=15)
8.83 fps -20%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)
35.5 fps +545%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps +155%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.3 fps +15%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.5 fps
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps -4%
Average UNISOC T606
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=15)
5.17 fps -6%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
18 fps +150%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)
14.3 fps +99%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7.9 fps +10%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
7.2 fps
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7 fps -3%
Average UNISOC T606
  (3.2 - 7.2, n=15)
5.63 fps -22%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +560%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.6 fps +180%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2.4 fps +20%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2.1 fps +5%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2 fps
Average UNISOC T606
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=15)
1.91 fps -4%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years)
6.22 fps +678%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps +200%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1 fps +25%
Average UNISOC T606
  (0.8 - 0.87, n=11)
0.835 fps +4%
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
0.8 fps 0%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
0.8 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
22187 Points +78%
Teclast M50
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
12461 Points
Blackview Tab 80
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
11786 Points -5%
Average UNISOC T606
  (2228 - 12696, n=11)
10889 Points -13%
Teclast P26T
Allwinner A523, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5911 Points -53%
Teclast M50Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Blackview Tab 80Teclast P26TAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
153%
7%
-33%
2%
167%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.9
916.45
240%
266.71
-1%
237.62
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
196
398.32
103%
235.98
20%
137.55
-30%
Random Read 4KB
69.6
182.74
163%
65.11
-6%
63.08
-9%
Random Write 4KB
62.3
128.92
107%
70.74
14%
11.69
-81%

温度

Max. Load
 31 °C35.4 °C34.8 °C 
 31 °C30.1 °C28.7 °C 
 29.8 °C28.4 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
30 °C33.3 °C29.8 °C
29.5 °C30.6 °C30.2 °C
28.7 °C29.1 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 30 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.05-2.09)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.825 (0.817-0.835)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.53 (7.52-7.56)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.04 (3.03-3.05)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.238.62533.232.13127.125.74030.529.9503432.86325.826.1801719.610019.924.612525.419.816017.32720010.635.925014.442.63158.145.74007.447.45007.856.3630960.180012.567.3100017.268.612509.467.916001066.520009.864.7250010.361.431501163.940001271.8500012.674.6630013.571.9800014.467.81000015.260.81250015.956.91600016.844.2SPL24.880.6N0.644.7median 12.5median 60.8Delta3.211.837.228.430.324.524.121.231.42737.332.625.923.419.518.816.524.113.729.213.736.29.239.38.3456.750.4757.58.860.88.365.88.965.810.767.88.766.89.170.49.775.810.677.311.372.21261.612.957.913.759.614.450.515.350.21647174323.982.60.543.7median 10.7median 57.92.711hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast M50Teclast P26T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast M50 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Teclast P26T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

运行时间

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Blackview Tab 80
7680 mAh
1012 min +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
857 min +15%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=68, last 2 years)
828 min +12%
Teclast M50
6000 mAh
742 min
Teclast P26T
6000 mAh
400 min -46%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 22min

Pros

+ 良好的存储配置
+ 金属外壳
+ 2 个 SIM 卡插槽
+ 稳定的无线局域网
+ Widevine L1
+ 不错的立体声扬声器
+ 无 PWM 屏幕

Cons

- 相机拍出的照片质量差
- 对压力敏感
- 过时的安全补丁
- 存储速度慢

评价 - 亮点不多,总体不错

Teclast M50 评测
Teclast M50 评测

事实上,Teclast M50 是同价位产品中相当典型的代表:你不能指望它有多高的性能,它的摄像头充其量只适合拍摄快照或二维码,屏幕分辨率也不高。虽然它的金属外壳很时尚,但它还可以更稳定一些,软件也可以再更新一下。

不过,Teclast 还是为其经济实惠的平板电脑带来了一些亮点:128GB 的大容量存储空间和 6GB 的 RAM 对于需要大量内存的用户来说是个不错的选择。此外,它还可以通过两张 SIM 卡使用蜂窝数据和拨打电话。

机身发热量适中,电池续航时间适合日常使用,而且由于采用了 Widevine L1 技术,在欣赏高清流媒体内容时没有任何障碍。受屏幕闪烁困扰的用户也会对其无 PWM 显示屏感到满意。

如果您不期待任何高端功能,那么价格实惠的 Teclast M50 一定会让您满意。最后,这款平板电脑拥有充足的存储空间、良好的运行时间和蜂窝数据支持。

该设备的替代品是 Teclast M50 HD如果您一定需要全高清屏幕的话。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9的显示屏稍小,但性能更好。

价格和供应情况

您可以在亚马逊店面查看 Teclast 的所有平板电脑。

Teclast M50 - 04/16/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
42 / 70 → 60%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
9 / 78 → 12%
Application Performance
58 / 92 → 63%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
69%
79%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast M50 评测 - 带有移动互联网、电话功能和大量存储空间的平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2024-04-18 (Update: 2024-04-18)