
比 iPad Pro 大,比大多数平板电脑便宜--Teclast T70 平板电脑评测
巨大的显示屏,小巧的价格。
Teclast T70 是一款平板电脑,售价不到 400 美元,配备 14 英寸大屏幕、蜂窝网络连接、GPS 定位服务和足够的电量,适合日常使用。由于尺寸较大,它是电影迷和数字报纸读者的理想设备。不过,你肯定得为价格做出一些妥协,不是吗?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
对 Teclast T70 的评价
只有极少数平板电脑的屏幕尺寸超过 14 英寸,而 Teclast T70 的售价低于 400 美元,几乎没有任何竞争对手。当然,由于价格低廉,它的性能一般,偶尔还会出现系统卡顿现象。
不过,你也不能忽视 Teclast T70 存在的一些问题:它的触摸屏有时只有在多次点击后才会有反应,而试图以超过 1080p 的速度播放视频则会出现卡顿。
在软件更新方面也不要抱太大希望,而且平板电脑的 WLAN 网络连接速度也不是最快的。
它的运行时间适合日常使用,定位服务也足够精确,因此你可以把它当作导航设备使用。
您应该花点时间考虑一下,Teclast T70 的低廉价格是否值得拥有这些限制,或者您是否应该花几美元购买其他制造商的旧款产品。
尽管如此,如果你急于寻找一款拥有超大显示屏的最便宜平板电脑,那么你还是会得到一款可靠的设备。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
您可以从阿里巴巴等在线零售商处订购 Teclast T70,目前的价格为$318.82.
规格
外壳 - 金属,印有天线
Teclast 采用金属外壳,没有任何难看的塑料条,以确保更好的接收效果,而是将这些塑料条印在平板电脑的侧面。唯一的配色是蓝色。它的摄像头模块由玻璃衬托,可以同心折射光线。
平板电脑的外壳做工精良:几乎看不出材料的过渡和缝隙。
尽管体积庞大,但该设备非常稳定,只是在扭动时偶尔会发出轻微的吱吱声。不过,这款平板电脑重达 960 克,相对较重。它没有指定的防水或防尘功能。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性 - 配备 3.5 毫米音频插孔
即使 Teclast 平板电脑标榜拥有 20GB 内存:实际安装的内存只有 8 GB,其余的应该通过交换文件来解决,但我们认为这不是一个明智的解决方案,因为数据存储速度要慢得多。256 GB 的大容量存储空间属于同级水平,不提供其他存储变体。
Teclast T70 配备了蓝牙 5.2 和 3.5 毫米音频插孔。该平板电脑没有 NFC 芯片。
microSD 读卡器
该设备的存储空间可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展,在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行测试时,读卡器的速度被证明相当快:它甚至可以赶上更昂贵平板电脑的读卡器。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Teclast T70 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=58, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 更新希望渺茫
制造商已从 2023 年起为其平板电脑配备Android 14。你不应该期待太多的更新:在测试时,最新的安全补丁是从 2024 年 8 月开始的,因此已经过时。
好在 Teclast 没有安装任何第三方软件。
可持续性
遗憾的是,在平板电脑的可持续发展方面,我们几乎没有任何正面的报道:平板电脑的包装仍然使用塑料薄膜,关于平板电脑二氧化碳排放量的信息和制造商使用的材料一样少。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是 LTE 和 GPS
Teclast T70 的通信功能包括 Wi-Fi 5、LTE 和卫星定位服务,对于这样一款价格低廉的平板电脑来说已经相当全面了。然而,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器测量的 Wi-Fi 数据传输速率时,我们发现了第一道裂缝:在某些情况下,Teclast 平板电脑的数据传输速率仅略高于 100 MBit/s。这对于上网冲浪来说已经足够了,但由于偶尔会出现速度下降到 50 MBit/s 以上的情况,这在日常使用中会变得很明显。
您可以使用蜂窝网络访问互联网,甚至有两个 SIM 卡插槽可供使用。不过,它的频率支持有限,因此在国外旅行时访问 LTE 网络可能会受到限制。
另一方面,在我们的实际测试中,它的 GPS 定位精度相当不错:在我们的骑行之旅中,Teclast T70 与我们的实际路线仅有轻微偏差,有一次还明显显示我们正穿过一栋房子。尽管如此,如果您不要求绝对的准确性,那么这款平板电脑还是可以用于导航目的的。
电话功能和通话质量 - 清晰可闻
您可以使用 Teclast T70 打电话。
您可以通过两个麦克风和扬声器或耳机进行通话。使用内部音响系统的通话质量很好,我们在测试过程中能清楚地听懂对方的声音。在通话时,我们必须确保声音不要太小,否则电话另一端就听不到我们的声音。
照相机--模糊的事件
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low-light

附件和保修 - 含电源
包装内有一个充电器、一条 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡针。
Teclast 平板电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器
Teclast T70 的屏幕最高运行频率为 60 Hz,因此响应速度不如其他产品。尽管如此,操作起来通常还是没问题的。但是,如果对平板电脑的功耗要求很高,输入有时就无法执行,例如,屏幕亮度控制就无法正常工作。
平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但可以通过面部识别解锁。不过,由于面部识别只能通过前置摄像头完成,没有配套的传感器,因此安全性不高,而且Android 也不允许用于某些应用,如解锁网上银行应用。
显示屏 - 竞争更激烈
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
65.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.131
Teclast T70 IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6" | Oppo Pad 4 Pro LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2" | Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Tab Extreme OLED, 3000x1876, 14.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 46% | 35% | 25% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 400 | 605 51% | 672 68% | 630 58% | 479 20% |
Brightness | 385 | 603 57% | 652 69% | 591 54% | 456 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 98 7% | 93 1% | 85 -8% | 90 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.46 -28% | 0.82 -128% | ||
Contrast | 1111 | 1461 32% | 768 -31% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.15 | 2.6 50% | 3.18 38% | 0.6 88% | 3.2 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.41 | 5.4 48% | 4.84 54% | 1 90% | 6.82 34% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 1.6 60% | 2.2 45% | 1 75% | 1.8 55% |
Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.08 106% | 2.396 92% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 7235 90% | 6405 101% | 7070 92% | 6624 98% | 6794 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
其色彩和灰度显示的准确度一般--肉眼可见轻微偏色。尤其是蓝色调明显失真。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.3 ms rise | |
↘ 12.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.7 ms rise | |
↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
性能 - 通常足以满足日常使用
Teclast 安装了 联发科 Helio G99是一款流行的中端 SoC。遗憾的是,它已经用了三年,与更昂贵的平板电脑相比,性能几乎没有优势。在日常使用中,偶尔会出现卡顿现象,尤其是在执行高强度任务时。
在 YouTube 上播放视频时,1080p 以上的视频质量会导致严重卡顿。这是一个遗憾,因为这意味着你很难使用平板电脑的大屏幕观看特别清晰的视频资料。
你只能期望在图形非常简单的游戏中以 60 Hz 的速度进行游戏,因为它的 GPU 性能通常最多只能达到 40fps。
在网上冲浪时,即使网络连接良好,您也不得不忍受大型网站页面加载缓慢的问题。
该设备配备了 UFS 2.1 闪存。这比价格较高的大型平板电脑要慢得多,但仍然足够在日常使用中快速传输数据。
PCMark for Android: Work 3.0
Antutu v10: Total Score
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench: on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
BaseMark OS II: Overall | System | Memory | Graphics | Web
CrossMark: Overall
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android: Overall Score NNAPI
AI Benchmark: Score V6
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
PCMark for Android / Work 3.0 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
Antutu v10 / Total Score | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Teclast T70 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Teclast T70 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
BaseMark OS II / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
BaseMark OS II / System | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
BaseMark OS II / Memory | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
BaseMark OS II / Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
BaseMark OS II / Web | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Teclast T70 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android / Overall Score NNAPI | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Teclast T70 |
AI Benchmark / Score V6 | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Teclast T70 |
Jetstream 2 | |
2.0 Total Score | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=10) | |
2.2 Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (n=1) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135) | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=11) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135) | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25533, n=21) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=11) | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130) |
* ... smaller is better
Teclast T70 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | Oppo Pad 4 Pro | Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | Lenovo Tab Extreme | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 270% | 251% | 157% | 126% | 25% | 38% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 975.4 | 3912.45 301% | 3801.54 290% | 1983.47 103% | 1914.4 96% | 912 ? -6% | 1294 ? 33% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 505.3 | 2963.58 486% | 3334.62 560% | 1873.45 271% | 1585 214% | 729 ? 44% | 917 ? 81% |
Random Read 4KB | 165.1 | 342.97 108% | 297.28 80% | 374.54 127% | 330.7 100% | 228 ? 38% | 209 ? 27% |
Random Write 4KB | 195.5 | 554.76 184% | 335.89 72% | 446.71 128% | 380.6 95% | 244 ? 25% | 216 ? 10% |
排放--无需担心高温
温度
得益于其较大的表面积,该设备的 SoC 可以可靠地冷却--我们在测试中注意到最高温度为 35.1 °C。压力测试显示,其性能仅受到很小程度的限制。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Teclast T70 | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
Teclast T70 | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Teclast T70 | |
Oppo Pad 4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra |
发言人
Teclast 平板电脑配备了四个扬声器,能产生不错的音效。它们能发出相当响亮的声音,甚至能重现一些低频。不过,音乐听起来有些遥远,不如高品质音响系统那样饱满。
遗憾的是,通过蓝牙输出的音频只能使用最基本的编解码器。
Teclast T70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab Extreme audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 无需充电即可观看三季节目
耗电量
平板电脑的功耗很低,尤其是在高负载情况下。
它的最大充电功率为 18 瓦,这意味着最长需要 4 个小时才能充满电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Teclast T70 10000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh | Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh | Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G99 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | 25% | -99% | -19% | 36% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.34 -15% | 1.5 48% | 2.57 11% | 2.6 10% | 1.207 ? 58% | 1.778 ? 39% |
Idle Average * | 3.1 | 5 -61% | 1.8 42% | 8.65 -179% | 3 3% | 1.965 ? 37% | 3.73 ? -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 3.5 | 5.11 -46% | 2.2 37% | 8.71 -149% | 3.4 3% | 2.2 ? 37% | 4.21 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 6.4 | 12.77 -100% | 5.8 9% | 14.98 -134% | 9.5 -48% | 5.05 ? 21% | 9.42 ? -47% |
Load Maximum * | 10.4 | 15.94 -53% | 11.4 -10% | 14.99 -44% | 16.9 -63% | 7.53 ? 28% | 13.2 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
虽然与同类平板电脑相比,这款平板电脑的 10,000 毫安时电池容量并不算大,但仍能确保良好的续航时间:我们在 WLAN 测试中测得的续航时间为 15:43 小时,因此你可以轻松上网一整天而无需重新插上电源。你甚至可以用它的内置存储空间观看超过 17 个小时的电影,举例来说,这足以观看近 3 季的《霹雳游侠》。
Teclast T70 10000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh | Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh | Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -34% | 20% | -5% | -29% | |
H.264 | 1023 | 721 -30% | 1287 26% | 745 -27% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 943 | 585 -38% | 1077 14% | 898 -5% | 664 -30% |
Reader / Idle | 935 | 2589 | 1059 | ||
Load | 207 | 292 | 306 |
Notebookcheck 总评分

Teclast T70 是一款售价不高的超大平板电脑。
作为回报,您必须考虑到它在性能和软件更新方面的一些限制。
可能的替代品比较
Teclast T70
- 06/03/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.