对摩托罗拉 Razr 70 的评价
摩托罗拉 Razr 70 只是一个小更新。它仍然是一款非常时尚、与众不同的可折叠手机，可以吸引很多人的注意。尤其是我们的测试机，它的背面看起来就像由小片珍珠母制成的，非常有品位。
另一方面，在价格上涨的同时，设备却没有明显升级：这里的人工智能性能提高了几个百分点，那里的摄像头分辨率略有提高。内存也变得更快了一些，电池的续航时间也更长了，但与其他蛤壳式可折叠手机相比，还是不尽如人意。
摩托罗拉 Razr 70（Razr 2026）提供了一个有趣的概念，看起来非常吸引人，也有有趣的使用场景，例如用作摄像机。不过，三星或小米的竞争产品性能要好得多，运行时间也更长。
还有去年的 Razr 60，性能几乎没有比它差，价格也只有它的一半多。因此，如果您想买到性价比最高的 Razr 70，在购买之前应该仔细看看这些替代产品。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Razr 2026 可在各互联网经销商处购买，如亚马逊网站，价格约为 800 美元。
规格
包装盒和设备 - 折叠式设计
摩托罗拉 Razr 总是与众不同：以前是超扁平设计的蛤壳手机，现在是蛤壳式可折叠智能手机，但仍能在外部显示屏上显示所有重要信息。
此外，手机外壳还采用了不同寻常的材料：运动绿（Sporting Green）有潘通色（Pantone）可供选择，具有类似合成皮革的质感，而灰色赤铁矿（Hematite）则更容易让人联想到织物。我们的测试设备采用的是亮白色，由醋酸纤维塑料制成，看起来就像在智能手机上镶嵌了微小的珍珠母片，折射出的光线也不尽相同。
材料过渡干净，做工也不错。不过，当我们的测试设备打开并扭动时，会发出明显的吱吱声，铰链也会有轻微的晃动。
这款手机不具备防水功能，不应暴露在肮脏的环境中。
256 GB 大容量存储空间和 8 GB 内存仍然是唯一的内存配置。USB 2.0 端口也没有改进。
通信和操作 - 几乎看不出折痕
由于技术复杂，翻盖手机往往不得不接受功能方面的限制。例如，Razr 70 只有 WiFi 6E 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。速度相当稳定，足以满足千兆级网络连接的要求。
5G 调制解调器拥有大量频率，即使在旅行中也能轻松访问移动网络。在我们测试期间的抽查中，接收效果良好。
内部的 120 Hz 屏幕可以可靠地操作，铰链上的折痕几乎看不出来。即使经过两周的测试，情况依然如此。外部显示屏的响应也很可靠。
指纹传感器集成在待机键上，解锁手机非常可靠。通过手机内部和外部的摄像头可以进行面部识别解锁。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Razr 60 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 仅在短期内更新
Android 16 预装在手机上。摩托罗拉承诺其翻盖手机的更新周期仅为四年，Android 。
根据制造商的说法，更新将每两个月进行一次，由于从 2026 年 3 月开始的安全补丁的状态，我们在测试时无法确认。
Razr 70 的包装不含塑料，除此之外，有关其可持续性的信息很少。
照相机 - 少量更新
广角摄像头已经升级，分辨率达到 5000 万像素。快照效果不错，但细节比较模糊。
主摄像头的分辨率也是 5000 万像素。图像质量还算不错，但无法与传统的高端手机相媲美。
内摄像头的分辨率为 3200 万像素。图像的动态范围和对比度可以再提高一些。
Razr 70 的一个实用功能是，由于有第二个显示屏，您还可以将其设置为无需三脚架，或直接使用主摄像头自拍。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightUltraweitwinkel
显示屏 - 快速，但使用 PWM
内部主显示屏和外部显示屏都很明亮，因此在户外或明亮的环境中使用也没有什么问题。内显示屏的色彩还原非常准确，而外显示屏的色彩还原稍差。
我们在主显示屏上测得的 PWM 闪烁频率为 67 Hz，因此敏感人士在购买前一定要试用一下。
主显示屏
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1347 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6248 K
外部显示屏
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1154 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.99 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.084
CCT: 6466 K
| Motorola Razr 70 AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 60 P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 0% | -35% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1331 | 1185 -11% | 1077 -19% | 1349 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1318 | 1178 -11% | 1036 -21% | 1354 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 94 -2% | 95 -1% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.31 -9% | 2.11 -76% | 2.2 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.18 | 1.78 18% | 3.62 -66% | 3.3 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.5 17% | 2.3 -28% | 1.6 11% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.133 103% | 2.155 102% | 2.06 107% |
| CCT | 6248 104% | 6382 102% | 6275 104% | 6484 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 67 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 67 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 67 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7822 (minimum: 1.31 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 42.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--令人失望
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7450X的人工智能性能提高了几个百分点，但在其他方面与来自 Razr 60.与三星或小米的可折叠手机相比，其性能相当低。日常操作通常可以很流畅，但一旦遇到要求更高的任务，手机就会显得力不从心。
至少内存已经升级为 UFS 3.1 闪存。虽然速度不如竞争对手，但与前代产品相比仍有显著提升。
在长时间负载的情况下，手机会发热，但不会达到令人不快的温度。SoC 也不会出现卡顿现象。
底部边缘的小型扬声器由听筒支持。系统音效相当不错，但最大音量还可以再大一些。有许多无线音频编解码器可用于连接耳机或扬声器。
电池容量增加了 300 毫安时，达到 4,800 毫安时。在我们的无线局域网测试中，这款手机的续航时间并不理想。不过，14:19 小时的续航时间足以满足一个工作日的需求。该手机可通过线缆以最高 30 瓦的功率充电，或以最高 15 瓦的功率无线充电。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | Motorola Razr 60 | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -20% | 120% | 65% | 3% | 29% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1689.2 | 1020.1 -40% | 4083.53 142% | 4044.67 139% | 1767 ? 5% | 2238 ? 32% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1188.1 | 918.4 -23% | 3894.12 228% | 2981.82 151% | 1224 ? 3% | 1919 ? 62% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 296.7 | 266.2 -10% | 403.94 36% | 366.98 24% | 289 ? -3% | 307 ? 3% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 307.6 | 282.9 -8% | 534.73 74% | 143.67 -53% | 325 ? 6% | 360 ? 17% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Motorola Razr 60 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr 60 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
Motorola Razr 70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Razr 60 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | Motorola Razr 60 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.3 | 13.6 -5% | 20 40% | 18.9 32% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
虽然 Razr 70 的进步不大，但它仍然是一款非常漂亮的可折叠手机，有着不同寻常的魅力。
如果你能以合理的价格买到前辈们的产品，那么你只能忍受小小的妥协。
Motorola Razr 70
- 05/28/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78%  | Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 869€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1080 413 PPI AMOLED |
2. 77.5%  | Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: $979.00 List Price: 799€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1080 413 PPI P-OLED |
3. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $484.97 Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | U... 2. $599.99 Google Pixel Fold - Unlocked... 3. $1,177.48 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 2520x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
