结论 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7
不久前，三星的 Flip 系列还是无与伦比的。然而，随着 Flip7 的问世，这种情况已不复存在，部分原因是这款小巧的可折叠产品并没有像Galaxy Fold7 那样在设计上进行全面升级。
Galaxy Z Flip7，三星再次推出了一款吸引人的可折叠手机，但小米 Mix Flip 2 在几个方面做得更好。三星的电池相对较小，软件设计感觉并不完全适应新的盖板显示屏，欧洲版的 Exynos 2500 比骁龙 8 Elite 弱。在最新一代 Flip 上，卡顿再次成为一个主要问题，包括有时会出现非常明显的性能下降。
建议三星公司重新考虑 Flip 的外形，尤其是作为在日益激烈的竞争中脱颖而出的一种方式。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况 - SamsungGalaxy Z Flip7
规格 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7
机身和功能 -Android 手机，屏幕更大
与前 前代Galaxy Z Flip7 看起来更加时尚。最显著的变化是 4.1 英寸的显示屏更大了，现在几乎覆盖了整个正面。大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 用于保护背面和正面。
精心制作的机身也变得略微纤薄了一些，而且仍然通过了 IP48 认证，可以防尘，但不是完全防尘。小于 1 毫米的微粒理论上可以进入并阻塞铰链机构。
展开时，Flip7 的厚度为 6.5 毫米；合上时，厚度为 13.7 毫米。 折叠式.铰链由先进的铠甲铝制成，手感坚固，适合日常使用。
在功能方面，该设备提供不含 6 GHz 频段的 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和带有线视频输出的 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口。在使用固态硬盘（三星 PSSD T7）进行的拷贝测试中，传输速率达到了 325 MB/s。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Nubia Flip 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 长时间更新的三星手机
Galaxy Z Flip7 预装了Android 16 和 One UI 8 界面，但不包括 DeX 支持。据三星称，更新保证期为七年。在测试时，安全补丁的日期是 2025 年 8 月 1 日，因此完全是最新的。
在小巧的 4.1 英寸封面屏幕上，可以使用小部件（包括来自第三方的部件），也可以部分运行某些应用程序。不过，它仍然不能完全替代内屏。在这方面，其他制造商，如小米公司的 Mix Flip 2提供了更好的可用性。
三星支持客户维修，因为备件和合适的指南可直接从三星获得。该公司在可持续发展方面也表现出色。随附的报告提供了有关二氧化碳排放量和再生材料使用情况的详细信息。
摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的小型手机
与 Flip6.事实上，Flip7 内部的光学元件比 Flip6 稍差，因为传感器略微变小了。配备固定焦距的 10 百万像素摄像头可在日光下拍摄出清晰的照片和 4K60 视频。使用主摄像头拍摄的自拍照更具吸引力，盖板显示屏可用作取景器。
背面是双摄像头设置。主摄像头也用于 Galaxy S25拍摄出的照片效果不错。由于没有长焦镜头，它还必须用于变焦，最多可放大十倍。
超广角摄像头在日光下也能提供良好的效果，但边缘会有轻微模糊。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏 - 采用 OLED 屏幕的可折叠手机
Flip7 的可折叠主显示屏略有增大，达到 6.9 英寸，但 LTPO 面板仍只能提供 1080p 分辨率。因此，像素密度降至 400 ppi。在 APL18 测试中，亮度达到了 2,636 cd/m²，非常不错。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 2,431 cd/m²。
在亮度控制方面，三星采用了脉宽调制技术，这是 OLED 的典型技术。我们记录的 PWM 闪烁频率相对较低，最高为 480 赫兹。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1349 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
CCT: 6484 K
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9" | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Honor Magic V Flip OLED, 2520x1080, 6.8" | Nubia Flip 5G OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -16% | 18% | 21% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 1349 | 1077 -20% | 1529 13% | 1164 -14% | 1210 -10% |
| Brightness | 1354 | 1036 -23% | 1535 13% | 1172 -13% | 1221 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 95 -3% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.11 4% | 1.3 41% | 0.7 68% | 3.1 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 3.62 -10% | 2.1 36% | 1.5 55% | 4.2 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.3 -44% | 1.5 6% | 1.1 31% | 2 -25% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.155 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6484 100% | 6275 104% | 6303 103% | 6482 100% | 6666 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 13.64 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8265 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.57 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4795 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.347 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2975 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
封面显示
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 1048x948, 4.1" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Super AMOLED, 720x748, 3.4" | Honor Magic V Flip OLED, 1200x1092, 4" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | |||
| Brightness middle | 1449 | 993 | 1559 |
| Brightness | 1460 | 994 | |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 95 | |
| Black Level * |
* ... smaller is better
性能、游戏、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备高端处理器的翻盖手机
在欧洲，Galaxy Z Flip7 专门配备了新的 Exynos 2500包括 Xclipse 950而在其他地区，速度更快的 骁龙8精英版Galaxy作为 SoC。在我们的基准测试中，三星芯片组在 Geekbench 6 中的速度比骁龙 8 Elite forGalaxy 中的速度慢 10%左右。 折叠7.
电池容量增至 4,300 mAh，与 Flip6可通过 USB-C 接口和高达 25 瓦的无线充电。查看 小米混合翻盖 2表明，三星急需在这方面做出改进。不过，Galaxy Flip7 在 Wi-Fi 测试中取得了近 19 小时的出色续航时间。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 401, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Honor Magic V Flip | Nubia Flip 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 79% | -3% | -18% | 12% | 41% | 9% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 4044.67 | 4083.53 1% | 1947.4 -52% | 967.4 -76% | 3930.68 -3% | 3733 ? -8% | 2208 ? -45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 2981.82 | 3894.12 31% | 1672.06 -44% | 766.69 -74% | 2603.84 -13% | 2747 ? -8% | 1809 ? -39% |
| Random Read 4KB | 366.98 | 403.94 10% | 277.55 -24% | 263.87 -28% | 445.5 21% | 381 ? 4% | 296 ? -19% |
| Random Write 4KB | 143.67 | 534.73 272% | 297.97 107% | 295.55 106% | 202.97 41% | 396 ? 176% | 340 ? 137% |
游戏
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nubia Flip 5G | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nubia Flip 5G | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Honor Magic V Flip | |
| Nubia Flip 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Galaxy Z Flip7 比上一代产品更薄、更轻、更快。通过长期的安全和系统更新，三星的翻盖手机也为未来做好了充分准备。
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 08/31/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 替代设备一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $1,069.99 List Price: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 2520x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $8.99 QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $6.99 QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P... List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
3. 80.2%  | Honor Magic V Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 730 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $16.95 BoxWave Cable Compatible wit... 2. $24.95 BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ... 3. $19.95 BoxWave Cable Compatible wit... | 193 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2520x1080 403 PPI OLED |
4. 85.4% v7 (old)  | Nubia Flip 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 644 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $13.80 Rfvzubemok Compatible with N... 2. $21.83 Lkfyyds for ZTE Nubia Flip 5... 3. $3.24 ZXL Grey Flip Wallet Case fo... List Price: 599€ | 214 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" 2790x1188 439 PPI OLED |
5. 84.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: $1,219.99 List Price: 1319€ | 187 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2640x1080 426 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
