关于摩托罗拉 Razr Ultra 2026 的结论
摩托罗拉这款翻盖手机相比前代产品仅有微小改进：虽然电池续航时间有了明显提升，但除此之外，摩托罗拉本质上销售的仍是与去年相同的翻盖手机。就连机身背盖所用的材质，去年款中也已采用。
此外，与高端手机相比，今年的机型仍需做出一些妥协：虽然处理器速度快，但已不再是顶尖水平。在图像清晰度和变焦能力方面，摄像头仅属中等水平，而考虑到其价格，USB 2.0 接口则是一个缺陷。
摩托罗拉在过热问题上进行了改进：在我们的测试中，骁龙 8 Elite 处理器已不再导致设备温度升得那么高。其做工质量以及铰链——其阻尼感恰到好处——在我们的测试中依然令人印象深刻。
这款手机充电迅速，电池续航充足，且配备了充裕的运行内存。然而，价格再次上涨，使得 Razr Ultra 2026（Razr 70 Ultra）成为一款价格不菲的选择。
价格与供货情况
例如，在amazon.com上，摩托罗拉对Razr Ultra 2026的要价约为1,500美元。
规格
案例与特点——高品质铰链
其尺寸和重量与上一代机型保持一致，翻盖设计也延续了内屏大、外屏4英寸的特点。与去年一样，外壳采用了Gorilla Glass Ceramic材质。该手机具备防水功能，甚至可以将其浸入浅水中。
提供两种配色方案：棕色款采用木质复合材料背板，以及带有深蓝色纹理的阿尔坎塔拉材质背板。铰链设计尤为出彩：单手即可轻松打开，且能在多种角度下稳固支撑手机。
摩托罗拉再次为其2026款翻盖手机配备了512 GB存储空间和16 GB运行内存。
通信与操作——高速 WiFi 7
Razr Ultra 2026 中的 WiFi 7 调制解调器，当与我们的参考路由器华硕 RT-BE96U 配对使用时，可提供非常快速且稳定的传输速率。
它支持广泛的蜂窝频段，让您几乎可以在世界任何地方使用该手机进行移动上网。 在我们的测试中，信号接收效果也相当出色。
两块屏幕响应迅速，刷新率最高可达 165 Hz。
指纹传感器集成在电源键中，因此无论手机处于打开还是关闭状态，都能轻松触及。它运行可靠，几乎能瞬间解锁手机。此外还支持面部识别功能，并可与所有摄像头配合使用。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——更新问题
该软件基于 Android 16 系统，与原生 Android 非常接近。在测试时，系统更新日期显示为 2026 年 5 月——因此这些更新已经有些过时了，尽管摩托罗拉实际上承诺每两个月发布一次更新。
安全更新计划提供至2030年2月——这意味着在测试时，剩余时间不到3年半。 然而，欧盟 EPREL 数据库中的 记录明确指出更新支持期为 6 年。不过，摩托罗拉并不认为这意味着这些更新必须始终是最新的。因此，总体而言，更新情况尚不明确。
该智能手机的包装中未包含任何塑料薄膜。
相机——使用主摄像头拍摄自拍完全没问题
摩托罗拉 Razr Ultra 2026 配备三颗 5000 万像素摄像头。其中两颗位于机身外部，一颗位于机身内部。 得益于翻盖设计，无需三脚架即可将手机竖立放置。这非常方便，您还可以一边在外部屏幕上查看实时预览，一边使用主摄像头拍摄自拍。
主摄像头的成像质量相当高，能够精准呈现细微细节。 视频支持以30帧/秒录制8K视频，以及最高120帧/秒的4K视频，让您能够拍摄高质量的慢动作画面。
广角镜头拍摄的全景照片效果不错，但细节表现仅为粗略呈现。
两颗摄像头拍摄的自拍照效果都不错，但如果有选择的话，建议使用主摄像头——它能捕捉到更细腻的画面。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow LightUltra wide angle
显示屏——两个高亮度OLED屏
主屏幕和外接显示屏均采用OLED面板，亮度极高且色彩还原准确。两块显示屏均能出色呈现HDR内容。
不过，您仍需忍受PWM闪烁现象；主屏幕上的闪烁频率虽低于外接显示屏，但这可能使其对对此现象敏感的用户而言更不适用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1436 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.22 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
103.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.148
CCT: 6342 K
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7" | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra AMOLED, 2992x1224, 7" | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 70 AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | 6% | |||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2689 | 2635 -2% | 2777 3% | ||
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2599 | 2431 -6% | 2845 9% | ||
| Response Times | -225% | -70% | -12% | -2951% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.5 ? | 2.4 ? -380% | 1.4 ? -180% | 0.64 ? -28% | 44 ? -8700% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ? | 2 ? -150% | 1 ? -25% | 1.05 ? -31% | 2.2 ? -175% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 142.7 | 707 | 121 | 240 | 67 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 44 -144% | 19 -6% | 13.64 24% | 14 22% |
| Screen | 14% | -45% | -29% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1436 | 1379 -4% | 1077 -25% | 1349 -6% | 1331 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.22 | 1.05 14% | 2.11 -73% | 2.2 -80% | 1.2 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.26 | 1.79 21% | 3.62 -60% | 3.3 -46% | 2.18 4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.4 26% | 2.3 -21% | 1.6 16% | 1.8 5% |
| Gamma | 2.148 102% | 2.124 104% | 2.155 102% | 2.06 107% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6342 102% | 6362 102% | 6275 104% | 6484 100% | 6248 104% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1393 | 1036 | 1354 | 1318 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 95 | 98 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -106% /
-88% | -58% /
-56% | -15% /
-18% | -981% /
-982% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
外部显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1002 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.37 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
89.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.215
CCT: 6480 K
PWM 内部显示屏
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 142.7 Hz Amplitude: 18 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 142.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 142.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7748 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定变焦级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是由于比例缩放所致。信息框中显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
性能、排放与电池续航——速度极快，但存在一些妥协
Razr Ultra 2026（Razr 70 Ultra）是一款性能极为强劲的手机，尽管骁龙 8 Elite已不再是最新的高端处理器。不过，即使面对资源消耗较大的应用程序和要求苛刻的游戏，它依然拥有足够的处理能力。
内存速度虽不及没有翻盖设计的高端手机，但数据处理速度依然很快。
长时间高负载运行时的发热量比前代机型显著降低。摩托罗拉优化了散热系统，这一点在压力测试中表现出的性能指标明显更稳定上也得到了体现。
扬声器音质尚可，但低音略显不足。该机支持所有主流音频编解码器，因此通过蓝牙连接外置音箱或耳机时，音质表现良好。
与前代机型相比，摩托罗拉将电池容量增加了若干mAh：在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，该手机的续航时间延长了约50分钟。
充电选项十分全面，包括有线快充和无线快充。此外，还可通过数据线为其他设备供电。
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Motorola Razr 70 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | 27% | -11% | -34% | 13% | -20% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3611.3 | 3504.7 -3% | 4083.53 13% | 4044.67 12% | 1689.2 -53% | 3708 ? 3% | 2236 ? -38% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3423.9 | 3450.9 1% | 3894.12 14% | 2981.82 -13% | 1188.1 -65% | 3129 ? -9% | 1918 ? -44% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 315.4 | 308.6 -2% | 403.94 28% | 366.98 16% | 296.7 -6% | 382 ? 21% | 312 ? -1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 351 | 347 -1% | 534.73 52% | 143.67 -59% | 307.6 -12% | 476 ? 36% | 359 ? 2% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.7 / 1.1 / 1.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) 5000 mAh | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4700 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 30% | -40% | -22% | |||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.7 | 0.6 14% | 0.49 30% | 1.074 ? -53% | 0.885 ? -26% | ||
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.87 21% | 1.637 ? -49% | 1.483 ? -35% | ||
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.6 | 1.4 13% | 0.99 38% | 1.868 ? -17% | 1.671 ? -4% | ||
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.2 | 8.87 ? | 6.73 ? | ||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 11.3 | 12.8 ? | 11.2 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) 5000 mAh | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4700 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -5% | 23% | 17% | -12% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 16.2 | 15.4 -5% | 20 23% | 18.9 17% | 14.3 -12% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 29.8 | 26.5 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 19.5 | ||||
| Load (h) | 5 | 4.3 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Razr Ultra 2026（Razr 70 Ultra）的价格有所上涨，性能也略有提升。不过，为了承担翻盖机构的成本，您仍需在部分功能上做出一些妥协。
对于资金充裕的用户而言，这款翻盖式折叠手机既时尚又做工精良，不失为一个不错的选择。
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026)
- 07/28/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可选方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.4%  | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (Razr Ultra 2026) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 1399€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.96" 2992x1224 462 PPI AMOLED |
2. 83.1%  | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 1299€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.00" 2992x1224 462 PPI AMOLED |
3. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 2520x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
5. 78%  | Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 869€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1080 413 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
