对摩托罗拉 Razr+ 2026 的评测
凭借显著更快的处理器、闪电般的内存、Wi-Fi 7 以及更大的外屏，摩托罗拉 Razr Plus 2026（Razr 70 Plus）旨在与标准版机型区分开来。它在我们的测试中表现出色，即使在日常使用中，这些升级也十分明显。
鉴于其网购价格已大幅下调，对于不愿为昂贵的 Razr Ultra 2026 大出血的用户而言，Razr Plus 是一个值得考虑的替代选择。
在电池方面，您可能需要做出一些妥协：该机型配备了该系列中容量最小的电池，遗憾的是，这一点在续航表现上确实有所体现。此外，设备使用时会变得相当烫手；手机偶尔会发出过热警告，但之后仍能正常运行，没有任何问题。
其摄像头系统拍摄效果尚可，但由于缺少长焦镜头，功能灵活性不如高端机型。
总体而言，摩托罗拉 Razr Plus 2026 是该系列中一款颇具亮点的新成员。 它非常适合那些希望在折叠屏手机上拥有更多功能和不错处理性能的用户。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
如果直接从制造商处购买 Razr Plus 2026，价格略低于 1,100 美元。
amazon.com 的售价与此相同。
规格
案例与特点——仅限绿色
虽然 Razr 2026 和 Razr Ultra 2026 提供多种配色选择，但 Razr Plus 仅提供“Mountain View”这一款绿色。机身背面覆盖着柔软且带有纹理的塑料材质。
这款手机做工非常扎实。它具备 IP48 级别的出色防水性能，但应避免在多尘环境中使用。
铰链在提供足够阻力的同时，仍能确保顺畅开合。
该机配备 12 GB 内存，在欧洲市场提供 512 GB UFS 4.1 存储空间；不过，国际版还提供 256 GB 版本。它支持 eSIM，但用户只能使用相对较慢的 USB 2.0 接口。
通信与操作——具备出色 Wi-Fi 功能的翻盖手机
该机型搭载了目前最快的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。在我们的评测中，Razr+ 2026（Razr 70+）的下载速度最高可达 1.792 Mbit/s。
该机型全面支持 5G 和 4G 移动频段，使 Razr Plus 2026 非常适合经常出差的人士。
内外屏均采用 165 Hz AMOLED 显示屏，对操作指令的响应非常精准。用于解锁的指纹识别器隐藏在待机按钮中，即使手机处于闭合状态也能轻松触及。解锁过程轻松自如，毫无延迟。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——关于更新的困惑
摩托罗拉出厂即预装 Android 16 系统，并对谷歌的操作系统基本未作改动。
预计安全补丁将提供至2030年——即该设备上市后的四年。这远低于欧盟的要求；EPREL数据库中该设备的支持周期也显示为六年。 不过，摩托罗拉很可能仅在此期间提供更新，四年后将不再续期。
包装采用无塑料设计；除此之外，关于该设备的可持续性信息遗憾地非常有限。
相机——成像质量优良
机身背面搭载了两颗三星摄像头传感器：主摄采用 Isocell GN8，超广角镜头采用 Isocell JN1。这意味着其摄像头系统与 Razr Ultra 2026 完全相同。唯一的区别在于，摩托罗拉在 Plus 机型上禁用了 8K 视频录制功能。
主摄像头的照片效果令人印象深刻：细节还原非常精准，即使在弱光环境下，手机也能拍出不错的照片。由于细节不足，超广角照片不宜过度放大。
得益于外屏，您还可以方便地使用主摄像头拍摄自拍。总体而言，这些自拍效果比使用内置前置摄像头拍摄的更好，尽管内置前置摄像头拍摄的自拍效果也还不错。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow LightUltra wide angle
显示屏——AMOLED 速度提升一倍
内屏源自 Razr 2026，规格与之非常相似。分辨率很高，经过两周的测试，折痕依然几乎看不出来或难以察觉。该屏幕比传统手机的屏幕略长且略窄。
由于采用AMOLED屏幕，调节亮度时需忍受180 Hz频率的PWM闪烁。因此，对此敏感的用户在购买前应先试用手机。
另一方面，外屏源自 Razr Ultra 2026，尺寸达 4 英寸，相当大；不过，外置摄像头已集成于其中。
在此处，PWM 闪烁发生在略高的刷新率下，因此对敏感用户来说可能更舒适一些。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1347 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.27 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
103.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.173
CCT: 6374 K
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus AMOLED, 2640x1084, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 70 AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9" | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -7% | ||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2765 | 2777 0% | 2635 -5% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2684 | 2845 6% | 2431 -9% | |
| Response Times | -2424% | 10% | -44% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.6 ? | 44 ? -7233% | 0.64 ? -7% | 1.4 ? -133% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.6 ? | 2.2 ? -38% | 1.05 ? 34% | 1 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 180 | 67 | 240 | 121 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14 | 14 -0% | 13.64 3% | 19 -36% |
| Screen | 5% | -24% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1346 | 1331 -1% | 1349 0% | 1077 -20% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.27 | 1.2 6% | 2.2 -73% | 2.11 -66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.39 | 2.18 9% | 3.3 -38% | 3.62 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.8 5% | 1.6 16% | 2.3 -21% |
| Gamma | 2.173 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.06 107% | 2.155 102% |
| CCT | 6374 102% | 6248 104% | 6484 100% | 6275 104% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1318 | 1354 | 1036 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 98 | 95 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -805% /
-805% | -7% /
-9% | -42% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 180 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7735 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
内部显示——采用固定缩放比例和不同亮度设置的测试系列（尽管在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
外部显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 979 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.63 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.186
CCT: 6634 K
性能、排放和电池续航——中等续航能力
骁龙 8s Gen 3 虽非绝对意义上的高端处理器，但仍具备强劲性能，在日常使用中甚至能流畅运行要求更高的应用程序。它搭配了速度极快的 UFS 4.1 存储。
在长时间高负荷使用下，该SoC有时会将性能降频50%以防止过热。机身明显发热的情况也较为显著。
扬声器与听筒协同工作，提供立体声效果。扬声器音量不大，且在高音量下声音偏重高音。 若需连接外部音频设备，可通过USB接口或蓝牙实现。无线音频传输支持多种编解码器。
4,500 mAh的电池容量实际上是Razr 2026系列中容量最小的。 在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，续航时间略低于 14 小时，虽然低于平均水平，但对于一天的正常使用来说仍然足够。该电池可通过数据线以最高 45 瓦的功率充电，或通过无线方式以最高 15 瓦的功率充电。
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | Motorola Razr 70 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -44% | -22% | 8% | -2% | -32% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3956.8 | 1689.2 -57% | 4044.67 2% | 4083.53 3% | 3632 ? -8% | 2249 ? -43% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3864 | 1188.1 -69% | 2981.82 -23% | 3894.12 1% | 3225 ? -17% | 1944 ? -50% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 359.4 | 296.7 -17% | 366.98 2% | 403.94 12% | 410 ? 14% | 312 ? -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 455.7 | 307.6 -32% | 143.67 -68% | 534.73 17% | 476 ? 4% | 360 ? -21% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Razr 70 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
Motorola Razr 70 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1 / 1.6 / 2.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus 4500 mAh | Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 50% | -18% | 14% | |||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1 | 0.49 51% | 1.208 ? -21% | 0.88 ? 12% | ||
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.6 | 0.87 46% | 2.03 ? -27% | 1.467 ? 8% | ||
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 0.99 53% | 2.25 ? -7% | 1.657 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Razr 70 Plus 4500 mAh | Motorola Razr 70 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 5165 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 2% | 35% | 43% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14 | 14.3 2% | 18.9 35% | 20 43% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 26.5 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.3 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
摩托罗拉 Motorola Razr Plus 2026 巧妙地融合了标准版和 Ultra 版的功能。
这为该系列开辟了一款全新的中端机型：一款价格稍低但依然功能丰富的时尚折叠屏手机。
然而，无法确定能收到系统更新多久这一点令人感到沮丧。
Motorola Razr 70 Plus
- 08/13/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可选方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79.7%  | Motorola Razr 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1000€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1084 414 PPI AMOLED |
2. 78%  | Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 869€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" 2640x1080 413 PPI AMOLED |
3. 86.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 2520x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
4. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $539.97 Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | U... 2. $219.50 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi... 3. $381.92 Motorola razr | 2024 | Unloc... List Price: 970€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86" 2912x1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
