Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Omen与帕斯卡。在很多高端笔记本电脑厂商都为它们的系统搭配了最新一代英伟达显卡后,惠普也为Omen系列带来了更新,推出了这个系列的新一代实惠型游戏本。它的性价比高吗?我们将通过评测来判断。
Sebastian Bade, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
HP Omen 17-w110ng (Omen 15-ce Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1443 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Micron), ForceWare 373.06
Memory
8192 MB 
, 2x 4 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 双通道, 2/2 内存槽已占用
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, G-Sync, 全高清, 75 赫兹, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, 固态硬盘 + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB机械硬盘 @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x M.2, 1x 2.5-寸
Soundcard
Realtek High Definition Audio
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2x 3.5毫米音频接口(耳机和麦克风), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Battery
95 Wh, 8300 mAh
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器:230瓦,配件:快速开始说明,服务指南, 软件: 一些惠普工具软件, McAfee LiveSafe 试用版, 微软 Office 365 试用版, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.25 kg, Power Supply: 808 g
Price
1800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg416 mm 279 mm 33 mm 3.3 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.2 kg417 mm 287 mm 30 mm 3.3 kg416 mm 279 mm 30 mm 2.8 kg411.8 mm 284.9 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G734III
 
77 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
76.4 MB/s ∼99% +1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
76 MB/s ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s ∼99%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
 
70 MB/s ∼91% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s ∼31% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s ∼97%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
 
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Nexoc G734III
 
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
575 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
566 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
440 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
465 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
450 MBit/s ∼84% -15%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
446 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
339
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD046E
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 362 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 342.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 362 cd/m²
Contrast: 1168:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w010ng
AUO119B, 3840x2160
Nexoc G734III
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080
Display
38%
2%
30%
3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.6
88.5
33%
67.4
1%
90
35%
68
2%
66.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
84.1
100
19%
85.8
2%
99.9
19%
87.5
4%
85.2
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.5
100
63%
62.8
2%
83.6
36%
64
4%
62.3
1%
Response Times
-25%
4%
42%
1%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 ?(13, 24)
49 ?(17, 32)
-32%
36 ?(14, 22)
3%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
24%
33.6 ?(14, 19.6)
9%
38 ?(14, 24)
-3%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(4, 20)
28 ?(6, 22)
-17%
23 ?(5, 18)
4%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
60%
25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)
-7%
22 ?(4, 18)
8%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(5)
Screen
-3%
-1%
13%
-12%
3%
Brightness middle
362
316
-13%
314
-13%
337.2
-7%
329.2
-9%
328
-9%
Brightness
342
312
-9%
308
-10%
315
-8%
321
-6%
317
-7%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
92
6%
86
-1%
93
7%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.28
10%
0.308
1%
0.267
14%
0.3
3%
Contrast
1168
1090
-7%
1121
-4%
1095
-6%
1233
6%
1093
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
5.69
-26%
4.17
7%
2.96
34%
5.93
-32%
3.74
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.31
7.94
15%
8.94
4%
5.45
41%
11.07
-19%
8.97
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.48
6.12
-76%
3.84
-10%
2.57
26%
6.72
-93%
2.67
23%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.56 86%
2.41 91%
2.25 98%
2.12 104%
2.41 91%
CCT
6144 106%
5875 111%
6950 94%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6861 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
87
58%
56
2%
74.3
35%
57
4%
56
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
100
19%
86
2%
100
19%
87
4%
85
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 2%
2% / 0%
28% / 21%
-3% / -7%
2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Outdoor use sunshine
Outdoor use sunshine
Outdoor use shade
Outdoor use shade

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
160 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
145 Points ∼91% -2%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼88% -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼88% -5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼84% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
789 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼86%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points ∼86% 0%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼85% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼80% -6%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.77 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼95%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼95% -1%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.62 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼85% -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼85% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.63 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼87%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points ∼86% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points ∼86% -1%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.37 Points ∼85% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7881 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7206 Points ∼91%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
30656 Points ∼100% +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
26510 Points ∼86%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.2 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
252 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
247.6 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.8 Points ∼86% -14%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
116.1 Points ∼43% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
37923 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
37205 Points ∼98%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33508 Points ∼88% -10%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
18466 Points ∼49% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1904 ms * ∼100% -78%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1811 ms * ∼95% -70%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1067 ms * ∼56%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
966 ms * ∼51% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3423
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20283
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5484
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
3426 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
26510 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7206 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.69 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
679 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
148 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
112.6 fps
Help
PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6803 Points ∼100% +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
5637 Points ∼83% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points ∼82%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5233 Points ∼77% -6%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5575 Points ∼100% +15%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼87%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼75% -13%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4180 Points ∼75% -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼72% -17%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3309 Points ∼59% -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5778 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼87% -7%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5011 Points ∼87% -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼83% -11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4054 Points ∼70% -25%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8531 Points ∼100% +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points ∼84%
Nexoc G734III
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5262 Points ∼62% -26%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points ∼61% -27%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
5062 Points ∼59% -29%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4678 Points ∼55% -34%
PCMark 7 Score
5556 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4833 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7128 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5394 points
Help
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
HP Omen 17-w010ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Nexoc G734III
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
20%
99%
-45%
-30%
126%
Read Seq
1156
1234
7%
1917
66%
334.3
-71%
481.7
-58%
1718
49%
Write Seq
294.9
583
98%
1283
335%
319
8%
315.4
7%
1305
343%
Read 512
616
606
-2%
871
41%
242.3
-61%
303.1
-51%
1250
103%
Write 512
294.7
428.3
45%
1199
307%
254.4
-14%
314.4
7%
1438
388%
Read 4k
42.7
41.42
-3%
51
19%
20.3
-52%
25.93
-39%
44.42
4%
Write 4k
153.3
137.2
-11%
142.1
-7%
42.51
-72%
84.6
-45%
154.4
1%
Read 4k QD32
600
622
4%
603
1%
251.6
-58%
273.9
-54%
744
24%
Write 4k QD32
295.3
348.3
18%
382.4
29%
167.1
-43%
274.9
-7%
578
96%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Transfer Rate Minimum: 70.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 140.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 111.6 MB/s
Access Time: 15.8 ms
Burst Rate: 263 MB/s
CPU Usage: 3.6 %
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
92468 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
86780 Points ∼94%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
79578 Points ∼86% -8%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
74477 Points ∼81% -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
67791 Points ∼73% -22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
34679 Points ∼38% -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16757 Points ∼100% +6%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16219 Points ∼97% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15806 Points ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11506 Points ∼69% -27%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
5863 Points ∼35% -63%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23356 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
22282 Points ∼95% +8%
Nexoc G734III
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20881 Points ∼89% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20656 Points ∼88%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14904 Points ∼64% -28%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7903 Points ∼34% -62%
3DMark 11 Performance
14116 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
107777 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22908 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11779 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6894 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4729 points
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
57 (47min - 64max) fps ∼100% +12%
Nexoc G734III
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
53.2 fps ∼93% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
50.8 (41min - 58max) fps ∼89%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
34.8 (28min - 39max) fps ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
34 (28min - 38max) fps ∼98%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
92.8 (80min - 103max) fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
90 fps ∼97% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
89.7 (80min - 102max) fps ∼97%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
61.4 fps ∼66% -32%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
38 (34min - 44max) fps ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
36.1 (32min - 41max) fps ∼95%
low med. high ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.1 171 161 103.8 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 196.3 150 94.8 50.8 34 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 173 151.7 105.6 89.7 36.1 fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 86.4 74.9 66.1 39.2 22.8 fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 107 93 83 79 37 fps
Doom (2016) 147.5 140.1 125.7 116.6 49.8 fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 118.6 114.5 104 48.7 43.3 fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 72.3 70.2 43.2 19 fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 176.3 159.5 118.9 110.1 45.7 fps

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Load
45 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise
3%
2%
3%
0%
7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.4
5%
29.7
1%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33
32
3%
31
6%
31.9
3%
33.2
-1%
31
6%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
32
6%
32
6%
33.2
2%
32
6%
Idle Maximum *
35
34
3%
33
6%
34
3%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Load Average *
45
41
9%
49
-9%
47
-4%
47.5
-6%
40
11%
Load Maximum *
52
51
2%
50
4%
49.4
5%
52.5
-1%
47
10%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only Prime95
Stress test: only FurMark
Stress test: only FurMark
Max. Load
 45 °C41.3 °C43.4 °C 
 41.1 °C42 °C37.5 °C 
 29.8 °C28.7 °C29.1 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
48.3 °C51.9 °C54.3 °C
32.3 °C41.4 °C42 °C
27.5 °C31.5 °C25.7 °C
Maximum: 54.3 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.4 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.3 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.1 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat
1%
-4%
-4%
-18%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
50.2
-12%
50
-11%
50.8
-13%
59
-31%
42.9
5%
Maximum Bottom *
54.3
54.1
-0%
60.5
-11%
60
-10%
66
-22%
41.5
24%
Idle Upper Side *
29.6
28.9
2%
29.1
2%
27.4
7%
33.2
-12%
31.6
-7%
Idle Bottom *
28.6
24.3
15%
26.9
6%
28.8
-1%
30.6
-7%
29.5
-3%

* ... smaller is better

You can use the software to …
You can use the software to …
… adjust the sound to your own preferences.
… adjust the sound to your own preferences.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.942.22534.836.93127.730.14032.740.65028.630.46326.427.68029.530.810026.131.412524.627.916022.336.520023.755.325022.662.331520.563.240019.562.550019.262.96301967.880018.668.910001868.4125018.363.916001970.5200018.171.1250018.268.8315018.470.6400018.374.7500018.474.5630018.577.8800018.6751000018.678.81250018.5761600018.665.7SPL30.885N1.562.2median 18.6median 68.4Delta1.66.643.943.736.635.230.130.332.638.131.634.529.941.530.947.829.550.9255322.758.922.568.521.769.720.771.820.27719.875.419.471.418.972.319.472.619.2712067.318.96818.474.718.473.618.166.518.365.618.468.118.46418.462.318.56118.555.831.183.11.560.7median 19.2median 68.11.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17-w110ngAcer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 19 / 25 / 31 Watt
Load midlight 90 / 193 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w010ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M
Nexoc G734III
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption
27%
11%
-14%
-16%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
19
10
47%
13
32%
22.6
-19%
18.4
3%
24
-26%
Idle Average *
25
19
24%
20
20%
32.7
-31%
22.8
9%
31
-24%
Idle Maximum *
31
25
19%
27
13%
32.8
-6%
24
23%
36
-16%
Load Average *
90
83
8%
90
-0%
114.7
-27%
175.5
-95%
94
-4%
Load Maximum *
193
118
39%
210
-9%
167.9
13%
229.5
-19%
204
-6%

* ... smaller is better

The 95-Wh battery …
The 95-Wh battery …
… is inside the chassis.
… is inside the chassis.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
4h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 55min
HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh
HP Omen 17-w010ng
62 Wh
Nexoc G734III
60 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
75.81 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
90 Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-16%
-25%
-11%
-23%
Reader / Idle
432
435
1%
400
-7%
353
-18%
418
-3%
311
-28%
H.264
233
214
-8%
208
-11%
186
-20%
WiFi v1.3
247
240
-3%
177
-28%
213
-14%
201
-19%
210
-15%
Load
115
76
-34%
95
-17%
66
-43%
103
-10%
84
-27%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕(宽可视角度和高对比度)
+ 无漏光,无闪烁
+ 优秀的性价比
+ 支持G-Sync
+ 高速NVMe固态硬盘
+ 时尚的键盘背光
+ 游戏性能强大
+ 8GB显存
+ 高速处理器
+ 轻薄美观的设计
+ 可以接受的电池续航

Cons

- 不支持USB 3.1第二代
- 触控版质感较差
- 维护更新操作复杂
- 无光驱
- 内置电池
In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

许多人听到惠普这个名字的时候都会想到办公笔记本电脑,不过来自惠普的Omen系列属于游戏设备。这台测试机Omen 17-w110ng可以满足我们对游戏本的期待。用户可以得到强劲的处理器和显卡组合,时尚的机身,不过它完全由塑料材质制成,也没有提供光驱。缺少光驱可能不会是个太大的问题,如果你用Steam这样的游戏平台的话,可以通过下载安装游戏。

比较让我们疑惑的是它的接口配备,它仅仅搭配了3个USB 3.0接口。我们更希望看到至少一个USB 3.1第二代C型接口。惠普也应该再改进一下输入设备。特别是它的触控版,给我们一种比较廉价的感受,不太符合这款设备的定位。它的尺寸不算小巧,6.5厘米的厚度显然不算薄。

考虑到各个方面,惠普Omen 17-w110ng是一台性价比不错的优秀设备。它的游戏性能让人无可挑剔。在运行中它也十分稳定,可以让用户毫无顾虑地享受几乎所有游戏。

这台设备的整体表现十分不错,不过也有我们以上提到的一些问题。它的性能非常优秀,完全可以达到游戏本的水平,这也通过测试成绩得到了证明。英特尔的Core i7-6700HQ处理器带来了对所有应用都充足的性能,由于搭配了强劲的英伟达 GeForce GTX 1070显卡,甚至是高要求的游戏也可以在全高清分辨率下运行(甚至4K)。它1800欧元(约13553人民币)的价位也十分诱人。类似的竞争设备价位都在2000-2500欧元(约15059-18824人民币)之间,因此惠普的Omen系列十分值得考虑。 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HP Omen 17-w110ng - 10/26/2016 v5.1(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
72%
Connectivity
59 / 81 → 73%
Weight
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Battery
74%
Display
87%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 89%
Noise
67 / 90 → 74%
Audio
70%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Average
75%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1404 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2016-11- 6)