惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Omen 17-w110ng
Brand: HP

Omen与帕斯卡。在很多高端笔记本电脑厂商都为它们的系统搭配了最新一代英伟达显卡后，惠普也为Omen系列带来了更新，推出了这个系列的新一代实惠型游戏本。它的性价比高吗？我们将通过评测来判断。

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-w110ng (Omen 15-ce Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1443 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Micron), ForceWare 373.06

Memory

8 GB

, 2x 4 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 双通道, 2/2 内存槽已占用

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, G-Sync, 全高清, 75 赫兹, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

, 固态硬盘 + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB机械硬盘 @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x M.2, 1x 2.5-寸

Soundcard

Realtek High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2x 3.5毫米音频接口（耳机和麦克风）, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 416 x 279

Battery

95 Wh, 8300 mAh

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器：230瓦，配件：快速开始说明，服务指南, 软件: 一些惠普工具软件, McAfee LiveSafe 试用版, 微软 Office 365 试用版, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.25 kg, Power Supply: 808 g

Price

1800 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G734III	77 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s +1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	76 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w010ng	70 MB/s -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	87 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w010ng	86 MB/s -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -1%
Nexoc G734III	86 MB/s -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	676 MBit/s
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	575 MBit/s -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	566 MBit/s -16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	512 MBit/s -24%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	440 MBit/s -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GS73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	536 MBit/s +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	529 MBit/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	465 MBit/s -12%
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	450 MBit/s -15%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	446 MBit/s -16%


339 cd/m²	358 cd/m²	348 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	362 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
316 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	337 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 362 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 342.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 362 cd/m²
Contrast: 1168:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-w010ng AUO119B, 3840x2160	Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080	MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080
Display		38%	2%	30%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66.6	88.5 33%	67.4 1%	90 35%	68 2%	66.9 0%
sRGB Coverage	84.1	100 19%	85.8 2%	99.9 19%	87.5 4%	85.2 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.5	100 63%	62.8 2%	83.6 36%	64 4%	62.3 1%
Response Times		-25%	4%	42%	1%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(13, 24)	49 ?(17, 32) -32%	36 ?(14, 22) 3%	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) 24%	33.6 ?(14, 19.6) 9%	38 ?(14, 24) -3%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(4, 20)	28 ?(6, 22) -17%	23 ?(5, 18) 4%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 60%	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) -7%	22 ?(4, 18) 8%
PWM Frequency			50 ?(5)
Screen		-3%	-1%	13%	-12%	3%
Brightness middle	362	316 -13%	314 -13%	337.2 -7%	329.2 -9%	328 -9%
Brightness	342	312 -9%	308 -10%	315 -8%	321 -6%	317 -7%
Brightness Distribution	87	90 3%	92 6%	86 -1%	93 7%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.31	0.29 6%	0.28 10%	0.308 1%	0.267 14%	0.3 3%
Contrast	1168	1090 -7%	1121 -4%	1095 -6%	1233 6%	1093 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	5.69 -26%	4.17 7%	2.96 34%	5.93 -32%	3.74 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.31	7.94 15%	8.94 4%	5.45 41%	11.07 -19%	8.97 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.48	6.12 -76%	3.84 -10%	2.57 26%	6.72 -93%	2.67 23%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.56 ^86%	2.41 ^91%	2.25 ^98%	2.12 ^104%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6144 ^106%	5875 ^111%	6950 ^94%	7114 ^91%	7611 ^85%	6861 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	87 58%	56 2%	74.3 35%	57 4%	56 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84	100 19%	86 2%	100 19%	87 4%	85 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 2%	2% / 0%	28% / 21%	-3% / -7%	2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -2%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points -5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points -6%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points -1%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.62 Points -4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.45 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.41 Points -1%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.37 Points -1%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7881 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7206 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	30656 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	26510 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	269.2 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	252 Points -6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	247.6 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	230.8 Points -14%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	116.1 Points -57%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	37923 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	37205 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	33508 Points -10%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	18466 Points -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1904 ms * -78%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1811 ms * -70%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1067 ms *
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	966 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3423

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20283

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5484

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

3426 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

26510 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7206 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.47 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

69.9 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.69 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

679 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

148 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

112.6 fps

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 7 | PCMark 8

PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6803 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	5637 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5556 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5233 Points -6%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +15%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4833 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points -13%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4180 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4012 Points -17%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3309 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5394 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points -7%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5011 Points -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4774 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4054 Points -25%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8531 Points +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	7128 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5262 Points -26%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points -27%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	5062 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4678 Points -34%

PCMark 7 Score		5556 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4833 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7128 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5394 points
Help

... in comparison

	HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	HP Omen 17-w010ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		20%	99%	-45%	-30%	126%
Read Seq	1156	1234 7%	1917 66%	334.3 -71%	481.7 -58%	1718 49%
Write Seq	294.9	583 98%	1283 335%	319 8%	315.4 7%	1305 343%
Read 512	616	606 -2%	871 41%	242.3 -61%	303.1 -51%	1250 103%
Write 512	294.7	428.3 45%	1199 307%	254.4 -14%	314.4 7%	1438 388%
Read 4k	42.7	41.42 -3%	51 19%	20.3 -52%	25.93 -39%	44.42 4%
Write 4k	153.3	137.2 -11%	142.1 -7%	42.51 -72%	84.6 -45%	154.4 1%
Read 4k QD32	600	622 4%	603 1%	251.6 -58%	273.9 -54%	744 24%
Write 4k QD32	295.3	348.3 18%	382.4 29%	167.1 -43%	274.9 -7%	578 96%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Transfer Rate Minimum: 70.7 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 140.2 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 111.6 MB/s

Access Time: 15.8 ms

Burst Rate: 263 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3.6 %

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	92468 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	86780 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	79578 Points -8%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	74477 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	67791 Points -22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	34679 Points -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16757 Points +6%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16219 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15806 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11506 Points -27%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	5863 Points -63%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23356 Points +13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22282 Points +8%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20881 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20656 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14904 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	7903 Points -62%

3DMark 11 Performance		14116 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		107777 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22908 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		11779 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6894 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4729 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	57 (47^min - 64^max) fps +12%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	53.2 fps +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	50.8 (41^min - 58^max) fps
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	34.8 (28^min - 39^max) fps +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	34 (28^min - 38^max) fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	92.8 (80^min - 103^max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	90 fps 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	89.7 (80^min - 102^max) fps
MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	61.4 fps -32%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	38 (34^min - 44^max) fps +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	36.1 (32^min - 41^max) fps

	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	197.1	171	161	103.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	196.3	150	94.8	50.8	34
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	173	151.7	105.6	89.7	36.1
XCOM 2 (2016)	86.4	74.9	66.1	39.2	22.8
Far Cry Primal (2016)	107	93	83	79	37
Doom (2016)	147.5	140.1	125.7	116.6	49.8
No Man's Sky (2016)	118.6	114.5	104	48.7	43.3
Mafia 3 (2016)	72.3	70.2	43.2		19
Battlefield 1 (2016)	176.3	159.5	118.9	110.1	45.7

Noise Level

Idle		33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD		34 dB(A)
Load		45 / 52 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise		3%	2%	3%	0%	7%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	28.4 5%	29.7 1%	30 -0%
Idle Minimum *	33	32 3%	31 6%	31.9 3%	33.2 -1%	31 6%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	32 6%	32 6%	33.2 2%	32 6%
Idle Maximum *	35	34 3%	33 6%	34 3%	33.2 5%	33 6%
Load Average *	45	41 9%	49 -9%	47 -4%	47.5 -6%	40 11%
Load Maximum *	52	51 2%	50 4%	49.4 5%	52.5 -1%	47 10%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


45 °C	41.3 °C	43.4 °C
41.1 °C	42 °C	37.5 °C
29.8 °C	28.7 °C	29.1 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 37.5 °C


48.3 °C	51.9 °C	54.3 °C
32.3 °C	41.4 °C	42 °C
27.5 °C	31.5 °C	25.7 °C

Maximum: 54.3 °C
Average: 39.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.4 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat		1%	-4%	-4%	-18%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	50.2 -12%	50 -11%	50.8 -13%	59 -31%	42.9 5%
Maximum Bottom *	54.3	54.1 -0%	60.5 -11%	60 -10%	66 -22%	41.5 24%
Idle Upper Side *	29.6	28.9 2%	29.1 2%	27.4 7%	33.2 -12%	31.6 -7%
Idle Bottom *	28.6	24.3 15%	26.9 6%	28.8 -1%	30.6 -7%	29.5 -3%

* ... smaller is better

… adjust the sound to your own preferences.

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	19 / 25 / 31 Watt
Load	90 / 193 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940 Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption		27%	11%	-14%	-16%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	19	10 47%	13 32%	22.6 -19%	18.4 3%	24 -26%
Idle Average *	25	19 24%	20 20%	32.7 -31%	22.8 9%	31 -24%
Idle Maximum *	31	25 19%	27 13%	32.8 -6%	24 23%	36 -16%
Load Average *	90	83 8%	90 -0%	114.7 -27%	175.5 -95%	94 -4%
Load Maximum *	193	118 39%	210 -9%	167.9 13%	229.5 -19%	204 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		4h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 55min

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh	HP Omen 17-w010ng 62 Wh	Nexoc G734III 60 Wh	MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v6 75.81 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-16%	-25%	-11%	-23%
Reader / Idle	432	435 1%	400 -7%	353 -18%	418 -3%	311 -28%
H.264	233	214 -8%	208 -11%			186 -20%
WiFi v1.3	247	240 -3%	177 -28%	213 -14%	201 -19%	210 -15%
Load	115	76 -34%	95 -17%	66 -43%	103 -10%	84 -27%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕（宽可视角度和高对比度）

+ 无漏光，无闪烁

+ 优秀的性价比

+ 支持G-Sync

+ 高速NVMe固态硬盘

+ 时尚的键盘背光

+ 游戏性能强大

+ 8GB显存

+ 高速处理器

+ 轻薄美观的设计

+ 可以接受的电池续航

Cons

- 不支持USB 3.1第二代

- 触控版质感较差

- 维护更新操作复杂

- 无光驱

- 内置电池

In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

许多人听到惠普这个名字的时候都会想到办公笔记本电脑，不过来自惠普的Omen系列属于游戏设备。这台测试机Omen 17-w110ng可以满足我们对游戏本的期待。用户可以得到强劲的处理器和显卡组合，时尚的机身，不过它完全由塑料材质制成，也没有提供光驱。缺少光驱可能不会是个太大的问题，如果你用Steam这样的游戏平台的话，可以通过下载安装游戏。

比较让我们疑惑的是它的接口配备，它仅仅搭配了3个USB 3.0接口。我们更希望看到至少一个USB 3.1第二代C型接口。惠普也应该再改进一下输入设备。特别是它的触控版，给我们一种比较廉价的感受，不太符合这款设备的定位。它的尺寸不算小巧，6.5厘米的厚度显然不算薄。

考虑到各个方面，惠普Omen 17-w110ng是一台性价比不错的优秀设备。它的游戏性能让人无可挑剔。在运行中它也十分稳定，可以让用户毫无顾虑地享受几乎所有游戏。

这台设备的整体表现十分不错，不过也有我们以上提到的一些问题。它的性能非常优秀，完全可以达到游戏本的水平，这也通过测试成绩得到了证明。英特尔的Core i7-6700HQ处理器带来了对所有应用都充足的性能，由于搭配了强劲的英伟达 GeForce GTX 1070显卡，甚至是高要求的游戏也可以在全高清分辨率下运行（甚至4K）。它1800欧元（约13553人民币）的价位也十分诱人。类似的竞争设备价位都在2000-2500欧元（约15059-18824人民币）之间，因此惠普的Omen系列十分值得考虑。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Omen 17-w110ng - 2016-10-26 10/26/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

76 / 98 → 78%

Keyboard

77%

Pointing Device

72%

Connectivity

59 / 81 → 73%

Weight

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Battery

74%

Display

87%

Games Performance

94%

Application Performance

93%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 89%

Noise

67 / 90 → 74%

Audio

70%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Average

75%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1616 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2016-11- 6)