GPD Win 4掌上电脑回顾。1080P的Ryzen 7游戏在你的手掌上

2023年GPD Win 4手持式Windows PC是2021年Win 3的直接继承者。除了处理器从第11代英特尔换成更强大的AMD Zen 3+外,其设计也从头到尾进行了全面改造,成为一台整体上更强大的机器,我们的审查将显示出这一点。
Win 4采用了相同的 Ryzen 7 6800U华硕ZenBook S13等旗舰超极本上的处理器。目前所有的配置只在内存(16或32GB LPDDR5-6400)和固态硬盘容量(1或2TB)方面有所不同,而AMD处理器和6英寸1080p IPS触摸屏保持不变。关于Win 4的更多制造商提供的信息可以在其Indiegogo页面上找到。.
竞争者包括Steam Deck、任天堂Switch和OneXPlayer。我们下面的比较也包括U系列供电的子笔记本。
更多GPD评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.3 % | 03/2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % | 07/2022 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 23 mm | 10.10" | 2560x1600 | |
GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 | |||
85.5 % | 04/2021 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
90.1 % | 11/2022 | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 764 g | 7.4 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
90.1 % | 07/2022 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--看起来像Vita,刺眼得像Switch
机箱由灰色镁合金、白色或黑色的ABS塑料组成,触摸屏采用边缘到边缘的大猩猩玻璃5保护。整体设计是Win 3的演变,同时融入了索尼和任天堂掌机的特点。例如,它的形状和游戏手柄的尺寸分别与PSP和Switch相似。最终的结果是比即将离去的Win 3更具吸引力和游戏性的外观。
Win 3的底盘刚性很好,现在Win 4的底盘刚性甚至更好。我们的设备会表现出最小的弯曲或扭曲,没有装配缺陷或缝隙,尽管所有不同的材料和移动部件构成了这个箱子。在背面施加压力时,有一些可以听到的吱吱声,但这并不是什么大问题。总的来说,建造质量可以通过任何一个主要游戏开发商的官方手持设备。
正如我们下面的尺寸对比图所示,该机型比旧版Win 3更厚、更大、更重。作为回报,用户得到了更大的6英寸屏幕,更强大的硬件,更多的端口,以及更强大的结构。这当然是一款更适合放在包里或钱包里的手持设备,而不是放在裤子口袋里。
连接性 - 是的,支持eGPU!
该模型集成了两个USB-C端口和一个USB-A。顶部的USB-C端口支持USB4,意味着该系统与外部GPU扩展坞兼容。否则,两个USB-C端口都可用于充电或连接外部显示器,而任天堂Switch只能通过其底部的USB-C端口进行充电。
SD卡阅读器
弹簧式MicroSD读卡器从Win 3上回归。尽管它的速度只有Win MAX 2中的MicroSD读卡器的一半,但性能还是不错的。 Win MAX 2.不过,它在将游戏转移到Win 4上时还是很方便的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 |
维护
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,零售盒中没有其他附件。可选的附件包括一个背装的4G LTE适配器和一个官方的USB-C基座。太糟糕了,该机型没有免费的便携箱或屏幕保护膜。
如果在美国购买,标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备
键盘 - 比Win 3更可靠
游戏手柄--就像在开关上玩一样
Win4上的操纵杆和按钮与任天堂Switch上的操纵杆和按钮尺寸完全相同,这并非巧合。毕竟,为什么要改变已经在最受欢迎的掌上游戏机上运行的东西?这里的主要优势是,如果你在Switch上玩得很舒服,那么Win 4游戏板将感觉非常熟悉。相反,我们主要担心的是,游戏手柄的按钮是不可拆卸的,所以随着时间的推移,任何磨损都很难维修,而控制台控制器则可以廉价更换。
后方的两个肩部按钮(L2、R2)比Switch上的相同按钮有更多行程。这是一个微小但明显的改进,使控制器的体验更接近普通XBox或PS游戏板。
游戏手柄有两种模式,就像Win 3一样:鼠标和游戏手柄。如果在鼠标模式下,游戏板按钮被预先映射到以下按键,如下面的截图所示。如果在游戏板模式下,Windows会将游戏板识别为标准的XBox控制器,以便自动与Steam和其他游戏兼容。在这两种情况下,预装的软件WinControls可以让用户根据需要重新映射按键。
除了L1和R1的肩部按钮外,游戏板的所有按钮都没有背光。
显示屏 - 全1080p IPS,60 Hz
Win3的一个主要缺点是它的屏幕尺寸很小,只有5.5英寸。许多PC游戏没有针对这种小屏幕进行优化,因此HUD和UI图标往往显得很小。Win 4通过更大的6英寸屏幕和更高的1080p原生分辨率解决了这个问题。黑白响应时间也更快,而色域和对比度与Win 3保持一致。IPS显示屏可能不像iPad Pro那样是层压式的,但它还是非常清晰和高质量的。
90%的sRGB色域允许深色,可与许多中端至高端笔记本电脑显示屏相媲美。遗憾的是,没有OLED选项,而OLED可以将颜色扩大到更多,以覆盖P3。
值得注意的是,该显示器不支持自适应同步或FreeSync。考虑到Radeon 680M在1080p时经常表现在40至60FPS的范围内,这一功能对该系统来说是完美的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 413.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1059:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.97 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.24
ΔE Greyscale 9.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10 | GPD Win 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U BOE NE13A1M, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.00 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -5% | 5% | 11% | 39% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 69.8 11% | 59.5 -6% | 66 5% | 70.7 12% | 99.8 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 91 -1% | 89.6 -3% | 97.4 6% | 99.8 8% | 100 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 66.6 3% | 61.4 -5% | 67.1 4% | 72.6 12% | 97.8 51% |
Response Times | 16% | -36% | -98% | -42% | 92% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.8 ? | 21.2 ? 21% | 40 ? -49% | 57.6 ? -115% | 44 ? -64% | 2.1 ? 92% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.9 ? | 18.7 ? 11% | 25.6 ? -22% | 37.6 ? -80% | 24.8 ? -19% | 1.68 ? 92% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | |||||
Screen | 8% | -9% | 24% | 41% | 196% | |
Brightness middle | 413.1 | 396.7 -4% | 468.8 13% | 356.8 -14% | 507 23% | 336 -19% |
Brightness | 407 | 381 -6% | 460 13% | 336 -17% | 486 19% | 338 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 93 15% | 88 9% | 87 7% | 99 22% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.36 8% | 0.45 -15% | 0.34 13% | 0.34 13% | 0.02 95% |
Contrast | 1059 | 1102 4% | 1042 -2% | 1049 -1% | 1491 41% | 16800 1486% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.97 | 6.31 9% | 9 -29% | 1.63 77% | 2.04 71% | 1.8 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.11 | 10.23 27% | 15.5 -10% | 5.03 64% | 3.1 78% | 3.8 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.24 | 1.44 -16% | 1.91 -54% | 1.08 13% | 0.86 31% | 1.8 -45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.9 | 5.5 44% | 10.9 -10% | 3 70% | 1.8 82% | 0.9 91% |
Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 9571 68% | 7502 87% | 10972 59% | 6434 101% | 6561 99% | 6580 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | 62 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 97.6 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
9% | -17% /
-12% | -23% /
2% | 3% /
22% | 109% /
147% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.5 ms rise | |
↘ 14.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 与最新的超极本一样强大
测试条件
处理器
的 Ryzen 7 6800U是市场上最快的U系列处理器之一。它是为许多最新超极本提供动力的相同CPU,包括联想Yoga 7 14 或惠普EliteBook 845 G9.原始多线程性能比Core i5-1135G7快2倍以上。酷睿i5-1135G7在上一代GPD Win 3中。
然而,性能的可持续性,可以更好一点。循环运行CineBench R15 xT会导致初始得分1776分,然后稳步下降并稳定在18%的性能赤字上。这款华硕Zenbook S13携带相同的CPU,能够在更长时间内保持更高的时钟速率。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (11187 - 12818, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (71474 - 84031, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (2455 - 2815, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (82608 - 96306, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (10724 - 11982, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39378 - 45748, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50547 - 102968, n=3) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (630 - 755, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (5825 - 6694, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (25037 - 27090, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6149 - 6469, n=4) | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (10205 - 10766, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (8588 - 9235, n=3) | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (7208 - 7947, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1417 - 1575, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1418 - 1596, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1493 - 1686, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1208 - 1457, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
PCMark 10 Score | 6394 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (47701 - 52159, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39402 - 44951, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (48723 - 51117, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (106.3 - 120.1, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
虽然主板芯片组支持PCIe4 x4 M.2 2280 NVMe驱动器,但该设备配备的是较慢的PCIe3驱动器。这不是一个问题,因为该模型没有为固态硬盘提供散热器,所以快速的PCIe4 x4驱动器在压力下很可能会节流。这款 1TB Biwin PCIe3 SSD在我们的设备中没有表现出随时间推移的性能节流。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Radeon 680M在掌上游戏中表现出色
芯片 Radeon 680M是目前市场上最快的集成GPU。当与竞争者的Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs相比,AMD的解决方案要快40%到45%,或者说比上一代产品快大约80%。 Radeon RX Vega 8系列.
大多数游戏在1080p的原始分辨率下是可以玩的(>30 FPS),甚至包括像《赛博朋克2077》或《最终幻想15》这样要求较低的设置。我们建议降低纹理质量和/或抗锯齿来提高帧率,因为这些图形功能对小屏幕屏幕尺寸的影响要小得多。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 KFA2 GTX 1060 6GB | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (6969 - 11605, n=15) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |