GPD Win 4掌上电脑回顾。1080P的Ryzen 7游戏在你的手掌上
2023年GPD Win 4手持式Windows PC是2021年Win 3的直接继承者。除了处理器从第11代英特尔换成更强大的AMD Zen 3+外,其设计也从头到尾进行了全面改造,成为一台整体上更强大的机器,我们的审查将显示出这一点。
Win 4采用了相同的 Ryzen 7 6800U华硕ZenBook S13等旗舰超极本上的处理器。目前所有的配置只在内存(16或32GB LPDDR5-6400)和固态硬盘容量(1或2TB)方面有所不同,而AMD处理器和6英寸1080p IPS触摸屏保持不变。关于Win 4的更多制造商提供的信息可以在其Indiegogo页面上找到。.
竞争者包括Steam Deck、任天堂Switch和OneXPlayer。我们下面的比较也包括U系列供电的子笔记本。
更多GPD评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.3 % | 03/2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % | 07/2022 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 23 mm | 10.10" | 2560x1600 | |
GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 | |||
85.5 % | 04/2021 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
90.1 % | 11/2022 | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 764 g | 7.4 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
90.1 % | 07/2022 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--看起来像Vita,刺眼得像Switch
机箱由灰色镁合金、白色或黑色的ABS塑料组成,触摸屏采用边缘到边缘的大猩猩玻璃5保护。整体设计是Win 3的演变,同时融入了索尼和任天堂掌机的特点。例如,它的形状和游戏手柄的尺寸分别与PSP和Switch相似。最终的结果是比即将离去的Win 3更具吸引力和游戏性的外观。
Win 3的底盘刚性很好,现在Win 4的底盘刚性甚至更好。我们的设备会表现出最小的弯曲或扭曲,没有装配缺陷或缝隙,尽管所有不同的材料和移动部件构成了这个箱子。在背面施加压力时,有一些可以听到的吱吱声,但这并不是什么大问题。总的来说,建造质量可以通过任何一个主要游戏开发商的官方手持设备。
正如我们下面的尺寸对比图所示,该机型比旧版Win 3更厚、更大、更重。作为回报,用户得到了更大的6英寸屏幕,更强大的硬件,更多的端口,以及更强大的结构。这当然是一款更适合放在包里或钱包里的手持设备,而不是放在裤子口袋里。
连接性 - 是的,支持eGPU!
该模型集成了两个USB-C端口和一个USB-A。顶部的USB-C端口支持USB4,意味着该系统与外部GPU扩展坞兼容。否则,两个USB-C端口都可用于充电或连接外部显示器,而任天堂Switch只能通过其底部的USB-C端口进行充电。
SD卡阅读器
弹簧式MicroSD读卡器从Win 3上回归。尽管它的速度只有Win MAX 2中的MicroSD读卡器的一半,但性能还是不错的。 Win MAX 2.不过,它在将游戏转移到Win 4上时还是很方便的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
英特尔AX210是Wi-Fi 6E兼容性的标准配置。在实际传输率方面,Wi-Fi 6E不一定总是比Wi-Fi 6快,但它得益于延迟的减少,这在流媒体游戏中会有所帮助。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 |
维护
塑料背板由六个非常小的飞利浦螺钉固定。不幸的是,在我们的设备上,背板边缘的锁扣非常紧,很难在不损坏设备的情况下拆除,这是一个耻辱,因为GPD Win 3在其他方面很容易维修。我们可以看到,M.2 2280固态硬盘是可拆卸的,而WLAN和内存模块是焊接的。
请记住,由于后部的按钮,背板是通过脆弱的带状电缆连接到主板上的。因此,你还是要小心,不要撕掉后面板或冒着损坏按钮的风险。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,零售盒中没有其他附件。可选的附件包括一个背装的4G LTE适配器和一个官方的USB-C基座。太糟糕了,该机型没有免费的便携箱或屏幕保护膜。
如果在美国购买,标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备
键盘 - 比Win 3更可靠
键盘已经被完全改造,从Win 3上的触摸感应键到Win 4上的触觉物理键。它们是点击式的,反馈更好,但打字速度仍然比典型的触摸屏键盘或智能手机慢得多。它们对于偶尔的输入来说已经足够好了。
请注意,我们在Win 3上遇到的错误在Win 4上已经被修复;上下滑动屏幕不再按键盘上的任何按钮。
游戏手柄--就像在开关上玩一样
Win4上的操纵杆和按钮与任天堂Switch上的操纵杆和按钮尺寸完全相同,这并非巧合。毕竟,为什么要改变已经在最受欢迎的掌上游戏机上运行的东西?这里的主要优势是,如果你在Switch上玩得很舒服,那么Win 4游戏板将感觉非常熟悉。相反,我们主要担心的是,游戏手柄的按钮是不可拆卸的,所以随着时间的推移,任何磨损都很难维修,而控制台控制器则可以廉价更换。
后方的两个肩部按钮(L2、R2)比Switch上的相同按钮有更多行程。这是一个微小但明显的改进,使控制器的体验更接近普通XBox或PS游戏板。
游戏手柄有两种模式,就像Win 3一样:鼠标和游戏手柄。如果在鼠标模式下,游戏板按钮被预先映射到以下按键,如下面的截图所示。如果在游戏板模式下,Windows会将游戏板识别为标准的XBox控制器,以便自动与Steam和其他游戏兼容。在这两种情况下,预装的软件WinControls可以让用户根据需要重新映射按键。
除了L1和R1的肩部按钮外,游戏板的所有按钮都没有背光。
显示屏 - 全1080p IPS,60 Hz
Win3的一个主要缺点是它的屏幕尺寸很小,只有5.5英寸。许多PC游戏没有针对这种小屏幕进行优化,因此HUD和UI图标往往显得很小。Win 4通过更大的6英寸屏幕和更高的1080p原生分辨率解决了这个问题。黑白响应时间也更快,而色域和对比度与Win 3保持一致。IPS显示屏可能不像iPad Pro那样是层压式的,但它还是非常清晰和高质量的。
90%的sRGB色域允许深色,可与许多中端至高端笔记本电脑显示屏相媲美。遗憾的是,没有OLED选项,而OLED可以将颜色扩大到更多,以覆盖P3。
值得注意的是,该显示器不支持自适应同步或FreeSync。考虑到Radeon 680M在1080p时经常表现在40至60FPS的范围内,这一功能对该系统来说是完美的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 413.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1059:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.24
ΔE Greyscale 9.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10 | GPD Win 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U BOE NE13A1M, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.00 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -5% | 5% | 11% | 39% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 69.8 11% | 59.5 -6% | 66 5% | 70.7 12% | 99.8 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 91 -1% | 89.6 -3% | 97.4 6% | 99.8 8% | 100 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 66.6 3% | 61.4 -5% | 67.1 4% | 72.6 12% | 97.8 51% |
Response Times | 16% | -36% | -98% | -42% | 92% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.8 ? | 21.2 ? 21% | 40 ? -49% | 57.6 ? -115% | 44 ? -64% | 2.1 ? 92% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.9 ? | 18.7 ? 11% | 25.6 ? -22% | 37.6 ? -80% | 24.8 ? -19% | 1.68 ? 92% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | |||||
Screen | 8% | -9% | 24% | 41% | 196% | |
Brightness middle | 413.1 | 396.7 -4% | 468.8 13% | 356.8 -14% | 507 23% | 336 -19% |
Brightness | 407 | 381 -6% | 460 13% | 336 -17% | 486 19% | 338 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 93 15% | 88 9% | 87 7% | 99 22% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.36 8% | 0.45 -15% | 0.34 13% | 0.34 13% | 0.02 95% |
Contrast | 1059 | 1102 4% | 1042 -2% | 1049 -1% | 1491 41% | 16800 1486% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.97 | 6.31 9% | 9 -29% | 1.63 77% | 2.04 71% | 1.8 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.11 | 10.23 27% | 15.5 -10% | 5.03 64% | 3.1 78% | 3.8 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.24 | 1.44 -16% | 1.91 -54% | 1.08 13% | 0.86 31% | 1.8 -45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.9 | 5.5 44% | 10.9 -10% | 3 70% | 1.8 82% | 0.9 91% |
Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 9571 68% | 7502 87% | 10972 59% | 6434 101% | 6561 99% | 6580 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | 62 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 97.6 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
9% | -17% /
-12% | -23% /
2% | 3% /
22% | 109% /
147% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏开箱后的校准效果很差。特别是色温在9571时太冷了,所以屏幕显得太蓝了。用X-Rite色度计自行校准显示器,可以将平均灰度和色彩deltaE值从9.9和6.97分别大幅提高到2.1和1.24。我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,以便从显示器中获得更多的sRGB准确的颜色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.5 ms rise | |
↘ 14.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
如果在阴凉处,户外能见度是相当好的。然而,如果再亮一点,光面屏幕的眩光就会成为一个问题。400尼特的屏幕并不像大多数流行的智能手机那样明亮,那里的显示屏可以达到1000尼特或者更高。
性能 - 与最新的超极本一样强大
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们将Windows设置为性能模式,将Motion Assistant设置为28W。我们强烈建议用户习惯使用Motion Assistant,因为它是Win 4的控制中心软件。 下面的截图显示了Motion Assistant提供的选项。
处理器
的 Ryzen 7 6800U是市场上最快的U系列处理器之一。它是为许多最新超极本提供动力的相同CPU,包括联想Yoga 7 14 或惠普EliteBook 845 G9.原始多线程性能比Core i5-1135G7快2倍以上。酷睿i5-1135G7在上一代GPD Win 3中。
然而,性能的可持续性,可以更好一点。循环运行CineBench R15 xT会导致初始得分1776分,然后稳步下降并稳定在18%的性能赤字上。这款华硕Zenbook S13携带相同的CPU,能够在更长时间内保持更高的时钟速率。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (10902 - 12818, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (67503 - 84031, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (2296 - 2818, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (62082 - 96306, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (7753 - 11982, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (37417 - 45748, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50547 - 115681, n=6) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (554 - 755, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (5825 - 6694, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (24728 - 27274, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果与最新的U系列动力超极本相当,同时远远领先于老款的Win 3。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (5057 - 6639, n=7) | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (8143 - 10766, n=6) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6089 - 9328, n=6) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6066 - 8144, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 3 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1009 - 1575, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (971 - 1596, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1054 - 1686, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (994 - 1473, n=7) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
PCMark 10 Score | 6394 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (47010 - 52159, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39197 - 45084, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (48723 - 51117, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (106.3 - 123.1, n=6) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,没有重大的DPC问题。然而,在我们的4K60视频播放测试中,即使经过多次重试,我们也能记录到一些丢帧。掉帧的情况并不频繁,而且大多不引人注意,但考虑到底层硬件,它们根本不应该发生。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
虽然主板芯片组支持PCIe4 x4 M.2 2280 NVMe驱动器,但该设备配备的是较慢的PCIe3驱动器。这不是一个问题,因为该模型没有为固态硬盘提供散热器,所以快速的PCIe4 x4驱动器在压力下很可能会节流。这款 1TB Biwin PCIe3 SSD在我们的设备中没有表现出随时间推移的性能节流。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Radeon 680M在掌上游戏中表现出色
芯片 Radeon 680M是目前市场上最快的集成GPU。当与竞争者的Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs相比,AMD的解决方案要快40%到45%,或者说比上一代产品快大约80%。 Radeon RX Vega 8系列.
大多数游戏在1080p的原始分辨率下是可以玩的(>30 FPS),甚至包括像《赛博朋克2077》或《最终幻想15》这样要求较低的设置。我们建议降低纹理质量和/或抗锯齿来提高帧率,因为这些图形功能对小屏幕屏幕尺寸的影响要小得多。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 KFA2 GTX 1060 6GB | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (6858 - 11605, n=32) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10232 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6235 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2559 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=29) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 572, n=29) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 4 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (75.5 - 147.3, n=17) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (44.1 - 85.4, n=23) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (38 - 74.6, n=23) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (30 - 55, n=23) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (7.85 - 14.1, n=20) |
怠速运行 Witcher 3 来测试帧率的稳定性,会发现重大问题。如下图所示,性能开始时很高,超过80 FPS,然后稳定地下降到65 FPS,并不断波动。虽然随着时间的推移性能下降并不罕见,但波动是不正常的,它们导致了游戏过程中的周期性微卡顿。为了确定这一点,我们测试了两次,结果没有改善。背景任务或应用程序的CPU利用率未得到优化,通常是游戏时产生这种行为的原因。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 140.3 | 127.6 | 51.4 | 24.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94.3 | 63.8 | 37.5 | 22.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 120.2 | 100.1 | 76.4 | 67.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 57.1 | 32.7 | 23.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.2 | 41.4 | 33.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 145.7 | 57.5 | 47.8 | 41.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 37.7 | 28.9 | 21.6 | 16.7 |
F1 22 (2022) | 78.1 | 70.4 | 51.5 | 12.6 |
排放--几乎总是能听到
系统噪音
无论屏幕上的负载如何,内部风扇总是在运转。例如,当在桌面上空转时,风扇的噪音将徘徊在31 dB(A)左右,而背景是24 dB(A),这已经比许多笔记本电脑在类似空转条件下的噪音大了。用户应该期望在浏览或观看视频时有安静但明显的呼啸声。
运行更高的负载,如游戏,将引起略低于49分贝(A)的风扇噪音。考虑到大多数超极本和游戏笔记本的最高噪音分别为40 dB(A)和50 dB(A)左右,Win 4在噪音方面不幸地更接近于游戏笔记本而不是超极本。我们不建议在上课时偷偷用Win 4进行游戏。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31.2 / 31.2 / 33.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.5 / 49 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 18% | 6% | 11% | 19% | ||
off / environment * | 24 | 22.6 6% | 27.4 -14% | 25.3 -5% | 24 -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 31.2 | 23.7 24% | 29.1 7% | 25.3 19% | 24 23% | |
Idle Average * | 31.2 | 23.7 24% | 29.1 7% | 25.3 19% | 24 23% | |
Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 28.5 15% | 29.1 13% | 27 19% | 24 28% | |
Load Average * | 45.5 | 36.5 20% | 40.7 11% | 47.9 -5% | 33.1 27% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.6 | 39.8 18% | 42.8 12% | 38.4 21% | 40.2 17% | |
Load Maximum * | 49 | 40.5 17% | 46.3 6% | 45.9 6% | 41.7 15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管单位体积的性能很高,但表面温度绝不会让人感到不舒服。虽然该系统比传统的笔记本电脑要小,但它仍然相当厚,因此表面温度并不像人们想象的那样热。
该设备的右侧总是比左侧的温度高几摄氏度,这并不令人讨厌,但在游戏过程中还是很明显的。过多的热量从设备的顶部边缘流出,就像Switch一样。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -40% | -17% | -37% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35 | 28.6 18% | 44 -26% | 41.8 -19% | 47.9 -37% |
Maximum Bottom * | 26.8 | 33 -23% | 47.4 -77% | 38.2 -43% | 56.1 -109% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.4 | 24.6 13% | 32.2 -13% | 27.4 4% | 26.8 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 25 | 27.6 -10% | 36 -44% | 27.2 -9% | 27.3 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别提升到2.9 GHz和28 W,持续约30秒或直到核心温度达到63 C。此后,时钟频率和电路板功耗将稳步下降,然后分别稳定在约2.3 GHz和18 W。尽管压力水平很高,但核心温度相对较低,为57 C;在英特尔驱动的电脑上重复这一测试 联想IdeaPad Flex 7i 14将导致更高的稳定核心温度为71 C。
当运行时,GPU时钟速率和温度将分别稳定在1316 MHz和55 C。 Witcher 3.即使设置为性能模式,核心温度也出奇的保守。
用电池供电运行并不限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回与在主电源上运行时基本相同的CPU和GPU分数。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 38 |
Prime95压力 | 2.2 | -- | 56 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.8 | 200 | 55 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.7 | 1316 | 55 |
发言人
GPD Win 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--对尺寸要求很高的电源
消耗功率
总体功耗高于Win 3和许多U系列驱动的超极本,主要是因为Ryzen 7 CPU和更大、更高分辨率的触摸屏。例如,游戏需要比搭载Core i5的Win 3多20%至55%的电量,但这被比i5-1135G7快2倍的CPU性能和1.5倍的GPU性能所抵消。仅仅在桌面上空转就需要7瓦到13瓦,这与许多超极本相似。
我们能够从小型(约6.4 x 5.5 x 2.8厘米)的65瓦USB-C交流适配器测量到,当处理器处于100%的利用率时,临时的最大功耗为56瓦。如下图所示,由于该型号的CPU Boost潜力有限,这一比率在几秒钟的压力后就会下降。令人遗憾的是,交流电适配器上的棱角是不能伸缩的。
Off / Standby | 1.5 / 1.54 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 12.4 / 13 Watt |
Load |
46 / 56 Watt |
GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10 | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB, IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13.00 | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 45% | -20% | 32% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 5.8 23% | 2.9 61% | 4 47% | 5.2 31% | 4.8 36% |
Idle Average * | 12.4 | 10.2 18% | 4.5 64% | 6.3 49% | 7.9 36% | 8.7 30% |
Idle Maximum * | 13 | 11.5 12% | 4.5 65% | 14.5 -12% | 8 38% | 10.1 22% |
Load Average * | 46 | 47.7 -4% | 38.5 16% | 79.2 -72% | 31.2 32% | 45.6 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.2 | 45.6 -1% | 28.9 36% | 68.2 -51% | 28.2 38% | 42.4 6% |
Load Maximum * | 56 | 76.8 -37% | 41.4 26% | 99.4 -78% | 47.6 15% | 49.5 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管Win 4的性能更快、整体尺寸更大,但电池容量几乎与Win 3相同。因此,Win 4的电池寿命缩短几个小时也许并不奇怪。在150尼特亮度下浏览网页时,我们能够记录到7.5小时的总运行时间,而在最大亮度设置下运行高要求的游戏时,仅有77分钟。
从空电到满电需要大约90分钟,与大多数超极本一样。请记住,如果同时进行游戏,充电速度会减慢。
GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 44 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 53.1 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 49.5 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 36% | 27% | 67% | 39% | 56% | |
Reader / Idle | 581 | 923 59% | 1235 113% | 815 40% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 450 | 523 16% | 675 50% | 541 20% | 538 20% | 550 22% |
Load | 77 | 103 34% | 79 3% | 121 57% | 146 90% | |
H.264 | 912 |
Pros
Cons
评语--使蒸汽甲板看起来过时了
Win4在几乎所有方面都比Win3有了巨大的改进。显示屏更大,控制更有触感,设计更强大、更有吸引力,键盘更可靠,性能也明显更快。你可以在前面贴上一个PS标志,它可能会骗过很多人的眼睛。
新的屏幕、性能和集成的物理键盘促成了Win 4更重的重量、更厚的外形和更大的风扇噪音,这是该机型的三个主要缺点。它的结构可能很坚固,但其他游戏掌机如Switch或OneXPlayer更薄、更轻,更容易在路上游戏。即便如此,它在与Steam Deck的竞争中仍有优势,因为Steam Deck比GPD的解决方案既慢又笨重。
GPD Win 4将强大的AMD Radeon 680M GPU与顶级的制造质量结合起来,使这款掌上电脑在几乎所有方面都比Steam Deck强。
Win 4的两个缺失是其糟糕的终端用户服务性和缺乏FreeSync支持。密集的设计使其难以更换内部固态硬盘或任何可能损坏的按钮,而FreeSync会在没有任何额外硬件的情况下改善游戏体验。值得一提的是,如果用户想以40 FPS为目标,减少屏幕撕裂的频率,该显示器有一个原生的40 Hz模式。
绝对应该解决的是游戏时帧率稳定性差或微卡顿的问题。大多数超极本,特别是游戏笔记本电脑没有表现出这个问题,我们希望在游戏是关键卖点的手持设备上也能如此。
对于未来的型号,我们希望看到GPD从目前的游戏笔记本中吸收更多的技术,以尽量减少厚度和潜在的重量。例如,改用液态金属导热膏、蒸汽室冷却和更大直径的内部风扇,可以使每体积的性能更高。在那之前,GPD Win 4很容易成为目前最好和最快的基于Windows的游戏手持设备之一。
价格和可用性
Win 4的Indiegogo页面Win 4的页面现在已经上线,最初的出货量将于2023年3月开始。配置方面,16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘的起价略低于1000美元,而内存和存储的两倍则为1300美元。
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.