惠普 ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Brand: HP

实惠AMD商务本。 AMD设备比搭载同样配置的英特尔处理器的ProBook 450便宜至少200美元。可惜，当与你的标准型超低电压版酷睿ix 处理器对比时，它的性能和电池续航有着明显的不足。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 12/18/2016 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

AMD Carrizo Business Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT (ProBook 455 Series)

Processor

AMD A10-8700P 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) - 512 MB VRAM, Core: 720 MHz, Memory: 800 MHz, DDR3, 2015.0821.1030.17037

Memory

8 GB

, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 2x SODIMM

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, TN, ID: 奇美 CMN15BE, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

Toshiba MQ01ACF050, 500 GB

, 7200 rpm

Soundcard

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SDXC reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

Slimtype DVD A DU8A6SH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 378 x 265

Battery

44 Wh, 4-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, HP Client Security, 3D DriveGuard, DTS Audio Control Panel, AMD Catalyst Control Center, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.15 kg, Power Supply: 258 g

Price

500 USD

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP 15z-ba000 Asus F555UB-XO043T Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Dell Latitude 15-3570 HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE DIN A4 ❌

Right: Optical drive, 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet

Left: Kensington Lock, AC adapter, VGA-out, HDMI-out, 2x USB 3.0

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 6RF	155.1 MB/s +185%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +98%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT	54.5 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +211%
MSI GT73VR 6RF	209.4 MB/s +160%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT	80.6 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s +492%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	309 MBit/s +248%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	88.7 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s +573%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	344 MBit/s +302%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	85.5 MBit/s

Warranty

The usual one-year limited warranty period applies to new purchases made in the US.


264.9 cd/m²	259.9 cd/m²	245.7 cd/m²
216.1 cd/m²	245.3 cd/m²	195.1 cd/m²
229.8 cd/m²	233.6 cd/m²	191.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 264.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 231.3 cd/m² Minimum: 11.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 72 %
Center on Battery: 245.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 598:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.46% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT TN, 15.60, 1366x768	HP 15z-ba000 BOE06A4, TN, 15.60, 1366x768	Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768	Asus F555UB-XO043T AU Optronics B156XTN04.6, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768
Display		-13%	-9%	-15%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	44.46	38.58 -13%	40.61 -9%	37.63 -15%	38.22 -14%
sRGB Coverage	66.4	57.7 -13%	61.1 -8%	56.7 -15%	57.5 -13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	45.98	39.86 -13%	41.96 -9%	38.88 -15%	39.49 -14%
Response Times		67%	-1%	7%	-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	45.2 ?(23.2, 22)	41.2 ?(18.4, 22.8) 9%	37 ?(13, 24) 18%	50 ?(20, 30) -11%	46 ?(24, 22) -2%
Response Time Black / White *	30.8 ?(11.2, 19.6)	33.6 ?(14.8, 18.8) -9%	37 ?(20, 17) -20%	23 ?(7, 16) 25%	27 ?(10, 17, Spikes in between) 12%
PWM Frequency	198.4 ?(99)	595 ?(99) 200%			50 ?(60) -75%
Screen		4%	-17%	-10%	5%
Brightness middle	245.3	244.5 0%	202 -18%	241 -2%	214 -13%
Brightness	231	232 0%	211 -9%	226 -2%	205 -11%
Brightness Distribution	72	80 11%	88 22%	89 24%	82 14%
Black Level *	0.41	0.385 6%	0.62 -51%	0.48 -17%	0.46 -12%
Contrast	598	635 6%	326 -45%	502 -16%	465 -22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.4	8.62 8%	12.35 -31%	12.43 -32%	6.52 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20	17.38 13%	19.9 -0%	21.03 -5%	9.1 54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.1	9.8 12%	13.46 -21%	13.24 -19%	7.05 36%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.09 ^105%	2.44 ^90%	2.61 ^84%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	12802 ^51%	11391 ^57%	15217 ^43%	15733 ^41%	8623 ^75%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42.3	39.86 -6%	39 -8%	36 -15%	36.6 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	66.1	57.71 -13%	61 -8%	57 -14%	57.8 -13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		19% / 12%	-9% / -13%	-6% / -9%	-10% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.2 ms rise
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.2 ms rise
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

198.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	124 Points +65%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points +56%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	99 Points +32%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	75 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	37 Points -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	318 Points +61%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points +48%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	223 Points +13%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	198 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	68 Points -66%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	1.45 Points +63%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points +49%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	1.14 Points +28%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	0.89 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.41 Points -54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	3.61 Points +53%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.24 Points +37%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	2.49 Points +6%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	2.36 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.86 Points -64%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	10964 Points +72%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	10003 Points +57%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	7580 Points +19%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	6357 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	2256 Points -65%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	4910 Points +106%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	4396 Points +84%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points +73%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	3725 Points +56%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	2389 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1216 Points -49%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1361 s * -167%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	790 s * -55%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	509 s *

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1566 s * -46%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD A10-8700P	1072 s *
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	849 s * +21%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	643 s * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4507

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

6357

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2389

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

17.75 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.36 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.89 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

23.17 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

198 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

75 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3535 Points +37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3472 Points +35%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3237 Points +26%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	2577 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	2484 Points -4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1661 Points -36%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4568 Points +30%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4463 Points +27%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	4249 Points +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	3511 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	3497 Points 0%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1464 Points -58%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4211 Points +36%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3760 Points +22%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3735 Points +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	3086 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	2676 Points -13%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1779 Points -42%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2577 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3086 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3511 points
Help

	HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Toshiba MQ01ACF050	HP 15z-ba000 Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX)	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		4322%	1964%	-7%	8581%
Read Seq	124.3	397.9 220%	453.2 265%	120.4 -3%	529 326%
Write Seq	121.8	171.4 41%	137.7 13%	123.1 1%	508 317%
Read 512	43.07	367.5 753%	308.5 616%	34.31 -20%	409.8 851%
Write 512	62	172.3 178%	134.1 116%	66.8 8%	316.5 410%
Read 4k	0.53	26.11 4826%	19.06 3496%	0.373 -30%	36.01 6694%
Write 4k	1.304	52.3 3911%	21.31 1534%	1.29 -1%	106.7 8083%
Read 4k QD32	1.174	164.3 13895%	93.5 7864%	0.976 -17%	384.8 32677%
Write 4k QD32	1.224	132.8 10750%	23.3 1804%	1.285 5%	237.3 19287%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ACF050

Transfer Rate Minimum: 68.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 126.7 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 103.1 MB/s

Access Time: 15.1 ms

Burst Rate: 158.6 MB/s

CPU Usage: 6.4 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1834 Points +27%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1545 Points +7%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	1443 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1343 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1265 Points -12%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	382 Points -74%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1525 Points +55%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1483 Points +51%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1401 Points +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1191 Points +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	985 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	414 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	8177 Points +78%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	6924 Points +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	6106 Points +33%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	5592 Points +22%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	4597 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	1907 Points -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1010 Points +21%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	963 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	897 Points +7%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	835 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	786 Points -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	49119 Points +54%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	37343 Points +17%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	31961 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060	14334 Points -55%

3DMark 11 Performance		1457 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		36716 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3463 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		736 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		373 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	50.9 fps +24%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	49.2 fps +20%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	44.6 fps +9%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	40.9 fps
Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002	35.8 fps -12%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	35.6 fps -13%
1366x768 Medium Preset
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	28.1 fps +15%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	26.8 fps +10%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	24.4 fps
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD	24.1 fps -1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	20.1 fps -18%
Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002	17.9 fps -27%
1366x768 High Preset
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	23.3 fps +21%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	22.2 fps +16%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	19.2 fps
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	16.6 fps -14%
Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002	14.76 fps -23%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	40.9	24.4	19.2
Metro: Last Light (2013)	15.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	16.8
Overwatch (2016)	26.1

	CPU Clock (GHz)	GPU Clock (MHz)	Average CPU Temperature (°C)
Prime95 Stress	2.3	--	63
FurMark Stress	--	720	57
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	1.3	617	62
Unigine Heaven Stress	1.3 - 1.8	642	60

Emissions

Noise Level

Idle		32.4 / 32.4 / 32.5 dB(A)
Load		35.5 / 36.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

	HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX)	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Noise		-0%	3%	-3%	0%
off / environment *	28.8	28.6 1%	31 -8%	31.2 -8%	30.15 -5%
Idle Minimum *	32.4	31.6 2%	31 4%	32.3 -0%	30.2 7%
Idle Average *	32.4	31.6 2%	31 4%	32.3 -0%	30.2 7%
Idle Maximum *	32.5	31.6 3%	31 5%	32.5 -0%	31 5%
Load Average *	35.5	37.2 -5%	34.2 4%	36 -1%	38 -7%
Load Maximum *	36.6	38.2 -4%	34.3 6%	38.8 -6%	38.6 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


38.2 °C	44 °C	22.4 °C
26.6 °C	34.6 °C	22.6 °C
25.2 °C	25.8 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


23.4 °C	33.4 °C	35.8 °C
24.8 °C	38.2 °C	42 °C
23.8 °C	25 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.9 °C / 3.5 F).

HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency Comparison (Checkbox selectable!)
Graph 1: Pink Noise 100% Vol.; Graph 2: Audio off

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.56 Watt
Idle	5.9 / 8.2 / 9.9 Watt
Load	37.5 / 41 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN, 1366x768, 15.60	HP 15z-ba000 A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, TN, 1366x768, 15.60	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		29%	23%	23%	9%
Idle Minimum *	5.9	5.22 12%	4.9 17%	5.2 12%	3.9 34%
Idle Average *	8.2	5.67 31%	7.2 12%	7.25 12%	7.8 5%
Idle Maximum *	9.9	7.82 21%	7.5 24%	7.9 20%	8.4 15%
Load Average *	37.5	19.67 48%	25.4 32%	25.1 33%	37 1%
Load Maximum *	41	26.72 35%	28 32%	25.1 39%	46 -12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 05min

	HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 44 Wh	HP 15z-ba000 A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), 31 Wh	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
Battery Runtime		23%	116%	111%	33%
Reader / Idle	572	511 -11%	1024 79%	885 55%
WiFi v1.3	240	247 3%	542 126%	566 136%	320 33%
Load	65	115 77%	157 142%	157 142%

Pros

+ 相对较强的机身；通过军事标准认证

+ 易于维护更新的内存，硬盘和无线网模组

+ 舒适键盘；可选背光

+ VGA, HDMI, 和光驱

+ 可拆卸电池

+ HP BIOSphere

+ 便宜

Cons

- 室外可见度差；屏幕背光可以更亮

- 除最高亮度外，存在屏幕闪烁

- 触摸板小; 鼠标键过软

- 显著的显卡和处理器功耗

- 只有一个内部储存间

- 系统风扇总是运转

- 没有USB-C或移动网络模组

- 屏幕盖感觉脆弱

- 电池寿命短

- 键盘发热

- 没有指点杆

Verdict

用于笔电的AMD Carrizo处理器具备可定制热设计功耗，本应算是极具通用性的。然而它的性能表现却比之前的第三代酷睿i5-4200U慢得多。相比较早前在英特尔硬件上搭载的 HD Graphics 520或HD Graphics 5500显卡，集成的Radeon R6显卡也存在着类似的问题。

如果ProBook 455运行时明显地更为安静和持久，那么AMD的性能短板也会变得可以接受。然而事与愿违。机器表面的温度并没有更低，电池续航甚至比预期的更短。

撇开处理器不谈，ProBook 455是良好的低工作负载准系统解决方案。它在概念和设计上都十分平庸，我们希望未来的修订版本至少能为硬件添加一些功能，包括USB-C以及指点杆选项。

当较老的英特尔酷睿ix处理器比最新AMD处理器提供的性能更高且续航更长时，我们很难推荐采用Carrizo平台的机型。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT - 2016-12-15 12/15/2016 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

45 / 80 → 56%

Weight

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Battery

75%

Display

76%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 80%

Application Performance

62 / 92 → 68%

Temperature

92%

Noise

89%

Audio

59%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

70%

79%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo, 2016-12-18 (Update: 2020-06- 8)