Notebookcheck

惠普 Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV 变形本简短评测

Sam Medley (translated by Delta Zhang), 01/07/2017
Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows

来回翻转。 惠普现在在15寸的Pavilion x360变形本上提供Kaby Lake处理器的选项。在升级到第七代处理器之外,还有一些其他的变化。这些变化能够让我们转变对于Pavilion的看法嘛?还是依旧无法让我们满意?

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV (Pavilion x360 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB, Core: 350-1050 MHz, Memory: 798 MHz, 集成, 21.20.16.4471
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR3L, 1600 MHz, 单通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10点多点触控, Chi Mei CHMN15D3, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
WDC WD10SPCX-60KHST0, 1 TB, 5400 RPM, SATA, 918 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo in/out, Card Reader: 多合一读卡器, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 382 x 248.9
Battery
48 Wh, 45908 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p 摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 2, 立体声, 朝下, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, None, McAfee LiveSafe™ 30-day trial offer, B & O PLAY Audio, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg, Power Supply: 340 g
Price
799.99 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
79 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
 
77.8 MB/s ∼98% +20%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
 
64.85 MB/s ∼82%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
 
64.1 MB/s ∼81% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
 
21 MB/s ∼27% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
 
87.86 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
 
86.8 MB/s ∼99% -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
 
85.6 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
 
84 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
 
26.5 MB/s ∼30% -70%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
309 MBit/s ∼59%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
88.7 MBit/s ∼17% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼100% +67%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
344 MBit/s ∼60%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
85.5 MBit/s ∼15% -75%
200.01
cd/m²
226.2
cd/m²
193.2
cd/m²
197.4
cd/m²
230.8
cd/m²
197.9
cd/m²
204.2
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
219.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CHMN15D3
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 230.8 cd/m² Average: 210.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Contrast: 641:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.58 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.94 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
64% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Chi Mei CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Chi Mey CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
AU Optronics B140HAN03.0, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
11%
-39%
-47%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.8 (13.2, 23.6)
30.8 (12.8, 18)
16%
53 (19, 34)
-44%
53 (17, 36, Plateau)
-44%
42 (19, 23)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 (6, 20.8)
22 (11.2, 10.8)
18%
26 (6, 20)
3%
33 (7, 26)
-23%
22 (6, 16)
18%
PWM Frequency
201.6 (99)
200 (90)
-1%
50 (50)
-75%
50 (10)
-75%
Screen
13%
20%
0%
9%
Brightness middle
230.8
225
-3%
236
2%
340
47%
266
15%
Brightness
211
210
0%
212
0%
302
43%
249
18%
Brightness Distribution
84
85
1%
78
-7%
77
-8%
85
1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.22
39%
0.18
50%
0.31
14%
0.26
28%
Contrast
641
1023
60%
1311
105%
1097
71%
1023
60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.58
4.13
10%
3.92
14%
6.75
-47%
4.98
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.23
9.36
17%
9.2
18%
12.4
-10%
11.82
-5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.94
2.53
14%
2.35
20%
8.47
-188%
2.68
9%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.6 85%
2.34 94%
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
CCT
6233 104%
6360 102%
6161 106%
6557 99%
6583 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41
39.8
-3%
40
-2%
58
41%
36
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
62.5
-2%
63
-2%
89
39%
57
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 13%
-10% / 6%
-24% / -11%
6% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 201.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17109 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
4985 Points ∼46% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
4965 Points ∼46%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
4368 Points ∼40% -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
11396 Points ∼17% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
11371 Points ∼17%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
9723 Points ∼15% -14%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼60%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.28 Points ∼52% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.58 Points ∼8%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.16 Points ∼7% -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼59% +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points ∼59% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼59%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points ∼52% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼7% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
308 Points ∼7% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points ∼6% -12%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
490.3 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Core i5-7200U
680.02 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7464
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11371
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4965
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
25.27 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.58 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.27 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
321 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
4433 Points ∼67% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
4130 Points ∼63%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3859 Points ∼35% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
3828 Points ∼35%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Radeon R7 M460, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3694 Points ∼61% +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3607 Points ∼59% +11%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3268 Points ∼54% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
3258 Points ∼53%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3026 Points ∼50% -7%
PCMark 7 Score
2897 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3258 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3828 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4130 points
Help
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
 
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-12%
8296%
6987%
6240%
Write 4k QD32
1.06
1.055
0%
237.3
22287%
152.2
14258%
197.6
18542%
Read 4k QD32
1.52
1.029
-32%
384.8
25216%
378.9
24828%
275.3
18012%
Write 4k
1.09
1.097
1%
106.7
9689%
91.23
8270%
86.67
7851%
Read 4k
0.5
0.373
-25%
36.01
7102%
34.35
6770%
19.88
3876%
Write 512
61.49
51.21
-17%
316.5
415%
219.9
258%
242
294%
Read 512
41.38
33.01
-20%
409.8
890%
386.2
833%
397.4
860%
Write Seq
110.1
106
-4%
508
361%
452.3
311%
270
145%
Read Seq
104.5
106.9
2%
528.9
406%
490.5
369%
458.6
339%
Transfer Rate Minimum: 12.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 111.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 84 MB/s
Access Time: 20.2 ms
Burst Rate: 182.4 MB/s
CPU Usage: 13.4 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
AMD Radeon R7 M460, 7200U
1816 Points ∼8% +26%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1549 Points ∼7% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1437 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1133 Points ∼5% -21%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
957 Points ∼4% -33%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
AMD Radeon R7 M460, 7200U
2141 Points ∼4% +59%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1506 Points ∼3% +12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1403 Points ∼3% +4%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1347 Points ∼3%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1280 Points ∼3% -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
777 Points ∼2% +16%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
670 Points ∼2%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
618 Points ∼2% -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
8388 Points ∼4% +39%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6670 Points ∼3% +10%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6042 Points ∼3%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
5440 Points ∼3% -10%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
35413 Points ∼5% +10%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
32197 Points ∼4%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44091 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5040 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
616 points
Help

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 31.1 / 31.1 dB(A)
Load
38.5 / 44 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Radeon R7 M460, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Noise
4%
3%
4%
-0%
off / environment *
29.8
28.9
3%
30.15
-1%
30.16
-1%
31.2
-5%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.6
5%
30.2
3%
30.16
3%
32.8
-6%
Idle Average *
31.1
29.6
5%
30.2
3%
30.16
3%
32.8
-5%
Idle Maximum *
31.1
30.2
3%
31
-0%
30.5
2%
33.8
-9%
Load Average *
38.5
39
-1%
38
1%
37.2
3%
36.3
6%
Load Maximum *
44
39.9
9%
38.6
12%
37
16%
36.3
17%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 29.2 °C33.2 °C27.2 °C 
 23.8 °C29.4 °C26.6 °C 
 21.6 °C22.6 °C24.2 °C 
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 26.4 °C
28.2 °C39 °C37.4 °C
28.6 °C30 °C26 °C
28.4 °C25.6 °C24.2 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 29.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Therometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (+3.4 °C / 6.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.937.42536.635.13132.133.64031.932.95031.831.96331.331.68034.13410032.730.712530.729.916031.334.620028.9442502852.531527.35540026.353.650025.85163024.954.280024.461.7100024.360.5125024.362.5160024.358.7200023.655.7250023.354.8315023.159.240002357.650002361.663002361.280002359.7100002360.11250023.155.41600023.153.8SPL36.171.4N2.728.9median 24.3median 55.4Delta1.96.231.631.531.630.330.730.336.135.636.131.230.131.229.627.229.630.728.830.726.526.926.526.52626.528.624.928.633.82333.839.122.639.146.321.546.357.520.857.564.619.964.661.919.561.964.618.764.672.118.172.167.617.867.664.817.564.86517.26564.717.464.76417.46464.217.664.26517.76564.717.964.76417.86466.717.966.764.81864.859.717.859.752.817.852.877.730.177.742.31.442.3median 64.2median 17.9median 64.26.81.46.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AVLenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 7.9 / 9.7 Watt
Load midlight 25.4 / 31.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
7200U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-2%
-11%
7%
2%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
4.3
19%
3.9
26%
3.7
30%
4.34
18%
Idle Average *
7.9
8.2
-4%
7.8
1%
7.16
9%
7.5
5%
Idle Maximum *
9.7
9
7%
8.4
13%
8.3
14%
8.4
13%
Load Average *
25.4
29.8
-17%
37
-46%
30.4
-20%
30.4
-20%
Load Maximum *
31.2
36.4
-17%
46
-47%
30.3
3%
32.5
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 45min
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
10%
-13%
40%
-20%
Reader / Idle
646
957
48%
449
-30%
WiFi v1.3
366
401
10%
320
-13%
561
53%
299
-18%
Load
105
126
20%
93
-11%

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳
+ 高反馈度的键盘
+ 扬声器能够产生完整的声音(使用音效软件)
+ 出色的计算性能
+ 低功耗
+ 众多的接口
+ 外壳颜色选择独一无二

Cons

- 极低速的机械硬盘
- 看上去很廉价的触摸板
- 喷漆容易划伤
- 屏幕亮度低且模糊
- 镜面屏反射过强
- 令人失望的续航能力
- 没有USB-C
- 对于作为平板使用来说设备过大过重
In review: HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

新一代的HP Pavilion X360好坏参半,虽然在键盘和处理器上有着明显的改进,但在屏幕和续航能力上却有所退步。Pavilion意在作为一台出色的办公设备,因为其搭载的Core i5处理器比处理基本的工作和多任务外有着更强的性能。然而对于多媒体应用来说,糟糕的屏幕仅仅是能用且不适用于长时间的视频观看。虽然有着2合1的功能,但Pavilion过大过重的机身使得长时间使用平板模式变成了不可能。所以变形能力感觉只是一个附加功能,不是太实用。

最大的问题在于低下的硬盘速度。5400RPM的机械硬盘对于今天的标准来说早已过时而且足以将任何一台出色的笔记本电脑拖到平均水平。再加上糟糕的触摸板,低亮度不出彩的屏幕以及难以进行维护,我们很难推荐Pavilion。它大多的优点都在于纯粹的外观上,而在真正重要的部分做的并不好。在同一个价位上,竞品提供了相同的Kaby Lake处理器,但有着更快的SSD,在同等的支出水平下,这些竞品是更好的选择。

在800美元的价位上,惠普 Pavilion并不是一个值得选择的产品。诚然升级到Kaby Lake处理器是十分受欢迎的,但这无法成为购买它的理由。用于应该考虑其他的2合1设备,比如联想Yoga 710-14IKB。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV - 12/22/2016 v6(old)
Sam Medley

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
56%
Connectivity
41 / 81 → 51%
Weight
61 / 20-67 → 87%
Battery
88%
Display
70%
Games Performance
56 / 85 → 66%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 78%
Temperature
87%
Noise
86 / 95 → 91%
Audio
80%
Average
72%
76%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV 变形本简短评测
Sam Medley, 2017-01- 7 (Update: 2017-01- 7)