Notebookcheck

宏碁 Aspire E5-774-54HJ 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 12/03/2016
Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

实惠型台式替代机。Aspire E5-774运行安静,几乎不会变热,同时便于升级维护,提供了全高清屏幕和优秀电池续航——它是一台不错的桌面式笔记本电脑。而550欧元(约4038人民币)的售价也相对低廉,不过它没有预装Windows操作系统。

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (Aspire E5 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 300-1000 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4494
Memory
4096 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 465 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 28 x 423 x 282
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3 kg, Power Supply: 340 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
 
72.7 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
 
44 MB/s ∼61% -39%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
 
40.3 MB/s ∼55% -45%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
 
18 MB/s ∼25% -75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
 
14.3 MB/s ∼20% -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
 
87.3 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
 
85.5 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
 
80.5 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
 
26.7 MB/s ∼31% -69%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
 
25.2 MB/s ∼29% -71%
327
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HTN01.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 353 cd/m² Average: 319.8 cd/m² Minimum: 25.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 929:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 13.38 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.69
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
1%
-2%
-5%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (21, 21)
43 (23, 20)
-2%
42 (22, 30)
-0%
48 (25, 23)
-14%
86 (44, 42)
-105%
Response Time Black / White *
23 (6, 17)
22 (5, 17)
4%
24 (7, 17)
-4%
24 (8, 16)
-4%
24 (7, 17)
-4%
PWM Frequency
1000 (90)
1000 (90)
0%
1042 (90)
4%
200 (90)
-80%
Screen
-7%
-33%
-26%
-15%
Brightness middle
353
320
-9%
205
-42%
216
-39%
304
-14%
Brightness
320
302
-6%
182
-43%
199
-38%
292
-9%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
77
-6%
80
-2%
84
2%
Black Level *
0.38
0.4
-5%
0.43
-13%
0.17
55%
0.37
3%
Contrast
929
800
-14%
477
-49%
1271
37%
822
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.07
7.78
-53%
9.75
-92%
12.2
-141%
10.62
-109%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.12
12.74
-26%
16.02
-58%
20.4
-102%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.38
8.87
34%
12.09
10%
13.3
1%
11.78
12%
Gamma
2.69 82%
2.27 97%
2.62 84%
2.15 102%
2.39 92%
CCT
15991 41%
8979 72%
12875 50%
15963 41%
12997 50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.1
62
3%
49
-18%
52
-13%
59
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.6
95
4%
76
-17%
76
-17%
90
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -5%
-18% / -28%
-16% / -21%
-39% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9268 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Color Checker (calibrated)
CalMAN - Color Checker (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grey Levels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grey Levels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4993
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11410
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7530
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.48 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points ∼60% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼59%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
118 Points ∼54% -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
106 Points ∼49% -18%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
45 Points ∼21% -65%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
330 Points ∼8% +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼7%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points ∼7% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points ∼7% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
159 Points ∼4% -52%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
6847 Points ∼8% +8%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
6338 Points ∼8%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
5993 Points ∼7% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5569 Points ∼7% -12%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
3266 Points ∼67% +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
2852 Points ∼59%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
2782 Points ∼57% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2396 Points ∼49% -16%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
6447 Points ∼21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
3502 Points ∼58%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
216.79 Points ∼62% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
211.53 Points ∼60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
192.58 Points ∼55% -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
186.9 Points ∼53% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2854 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3734 Points ∼61% +31%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Radeon R5 M335, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3232 Points ∼53% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3184 Points ∼52% +12%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
2854 Points ∼47%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A6-7310, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
1855 Points ∼30% -35%
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Transfer Rate Minimum: 48.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 118.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 90.5 MB/s
Access Time: 18.5 ms
Burst Rate: 237.3 MB/s
CPU Usage: 8.3 %
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Lite-On CV1-8B256
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
9156%
-10%
18%
-22%
Write 4k QD32
1.13
269.8
23776%
0.764
-32%
1.162
3%
0.642
-43%
Read 4k QD32
0.891
277.7
31067%
0.708
-21%
1.095
23%
0.59
-34%
Write 4k
1.117
85.09
7518%
0.792
-29%
1.153
3%
0.638
-43%
Read 4k
0.381
32.31
8380%
0.312
-18%
0.425
12%
0.288
-24%
Write 512
51.59
357.7
593%
43.34
-16%
51.79
0%
32.7
-37%
Read 512
33.01
382.8
1060%
28.15
-15%
37.29
13%
26.59
-19%
Write Seq
70.86
332.8
370%
96.3
36%
113.8
61%
84.69
20%
Read Seq
88.92
520.3
485%
100.6
13%
113.9
28%
91.85
3%
3DMark 11 Performance
1413 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2813 Points ∼6% +111%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U
1784 Points ∼3% +34%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1555 Points ∼3% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
1518 Points ∼3% +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1331 Points ∼3%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A6-7310
764 Points ∼1% -43%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 35.6 20.1 16.6 5.4 fps
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
116.4 fps ∼26% +227%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
52.3 fps ∼12% +47%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U
44.9 fps ∼10% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
43.2 fps ∼10% +21%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
35.6 fps ∼8%

Noise Level

Idle
30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
HDD
32.4 dB(A)
DVD
35.6 / dB(A)
Load
32.1 / 33.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Max. Load
 29 °C27.4 °C24.6 °C 
 29.3 °C30.4 °C24.3 °C 
 28.2 °C28.8 °C24.9 °C 
Maximum: 30.4 °C
Average: 27.4 °C
23.2 °C26 °C28.7 °C
23 °C24.5 °C30.6 °C
25 °C25.2 °C28.2 °C
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 26 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.7 °C / -1.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.134.634.12530.539.630.53137.139.937.14030.635.230.6503032.3306328.628.228.68029.42629.410031263112529.125.429.116030.623.330.620038.423.838.42505122.75131554.821.654.840059.820.259.850056.419.656.463064.518.664.580067.918.667.9100068.41868.4125057.117.457.1160056.717.956.7200063.617.563.6250064.117.864.1315068.617.968.6400070.41870.4500068.818.368.8630067.118.467.1800067.118.467.11000073.318.473.31250076.618.276.61600081.318.481.3SPL80.730.580.7N44.81.444.8median 64.1median 18.4median 64.1Delta8.928.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Aspire E5-774-54HJApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 10.1 / 10.5 Watt
Load midlight 34.3 / 37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 38)
5h 20min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh
406 min ∼15% +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
322 min ∼12% +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
320 min ∼12%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
6200U, Radeon R5 M335, 40 Wh
301 min ∼11% -6%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
A6-7310, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 37 Wh
228 min ∼9% -29%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕
+ 全高清分辨率
+ 空余M.2插槽
+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 维护底盖
+ ac标准无线模组
+ USB-C接口(USB 3.1第一代)

Cons

- 接口布局
In review: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ. Test model provided by Cyberport.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

Kaby Lake架构的酷睿i5可以为日常使用带来足够的性能,而它的集成显卡也可以流畅运行很多(配置要求较低的)游戏。我们建议用户为它添加第二条内存来增强系统和图形性能。这台笔记本电脑在使用中可以保持安静,几乎不会变热。500GB的硬盘空间十分充裕,但我们建议为它增加一块M.2接口固态硬盘。由于它底盖设计有维护窗口,用户可以方便地对硬件更新升级。它的键盘也十分不错,作为一台17.3寸笔记本它的电池续航也算不错。磨砂的全高清屏幕亮度和对比度都很高,但由于采用TN技术可视角度范围较为有限。不过这应该算是品质最高的TN面板之一了,它的可视角度比普通的廉价TN面板宽广不少。遗憾的是,这仍然无法帮助它与IPS屏幕相提并论。

Aspire E5-774是一台设计优秀的家庭办公笔记本电脑。

如果你喜欢这台笔记本电脑,但需要更高的显卡性能,我们建议你考虑一下Aspire E5-774G。E5-774G搭配了GDDR5显存GeForce 940MX独立显卡,它相比搭配GDDR3显存的GeForce 940MX显卡性能会高出20%至30%。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ - 11/20/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
49 / 80 → 61%
Weight
57 / 20-67 → 79%
Battery
84%
Display
83%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 78%
Temperature
96%
Noise
93%
Audio
54%
Camera
25 / 85 → 29%
Average
69%
80%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁 Aspire E5-774-54HJ 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12- 3 (Update: 2016-12- 3)