Notebookcheck Logo

小米13 Pro评测。配备徕卡相机的高质量智能手机，但也有两个主要缺点

小米为什么不学习？ 小米13 Pro采用优雅的陶瓷外壳，使用高通骁龙8代。除了非常明亮的LTPO显示屏和强大的硬件之外，小米目前的旗舰智能手机再次给我们的编辑团队留下了一些未解答的问题...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

小米12 Pro的继任者 ，自去年年底以来已经在中国市场上市，正如预期的那样，它采用了非常强大的组件。除了快速的LPDDR5X内存和UFS 4.0存储，小米13 Pro还采用了高通骁龙8号2代 。国际上市仍在等待中，但应该在几周后--2月底， 。作为一款进口设备，配备8GB内存和256GB内部存储的入门级版本的价格约为800美元。

这家中国制造商目前的旗舰产品（至少在预期的Ultra机型推出之前）主要侧重于摄影。与12S机型一样，13 Pro的相机系统是与德国公司徕卡合作创建的。1英寸的索尼IMX989，从12S Ultra中得知。 12S Ultra作为主摄像头的基础，它应该保证良好的照片。但是，新的5000万像素长焦相机带有 "浮动元素 "功能，可进行10厘米以内的特写，听起来也很有希望。

Xiaomi 13 Pro (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, OTG, IR Blaster, Miracast, UWB-Chip
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G Nr: N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28a / N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 / N79; 4G LTE: B1 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B26 / B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42; 3G WCDMA: 850/1900/2100MHz; 2G GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.38 x 162.9 x 74.6
Battery
4820 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 23mm, 1.6µm) + 50MP (3.2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 75mm) + 50MP (f/2.2, 14mm), camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, case, USB cable, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
229 g, Power Supply: 163 g
Price
930 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.2 %
03/2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.6 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
90 %
02/2023
Vivo X90 Pro+
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		221 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"3200x1440
89.1 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.4 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
88.9 %
11/2022
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		209 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2616x1212
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
Xaomi 13 Pro的颜色
Xaomi 13 Pro的颜色
 

小米13 Pro有四种颜色可供购买：黑色、白色、浅绿色和浅蓝色。前三种颜色的变体有一个由 "纳米生物 "陶瓷制成的背面，而浅蓝色的变体有一个仿皮革的表面，根据制造商的说法，在日常使用中非常耐脏。我们的白色评测样品有一个高光泽的表面，似乎并不真正吸引指纹。

根据IP68标准，小米智能手机具有防尘和防水功能，感觉非常优质。前面使用了康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus，它可以保护略微弯曲的6.73英寸OLED面板不被刮伤。屏幕周围的边缘很窄，但89.2%的显示与表面比率略低于Galaxy S23 Ultra的比率。

小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

尺寸比较

❌
164.35 mm 75.29 mm 9.7 mm 221 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g162.1 mm 75.5 mm 8.5 mm 209 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--小米智能手机与红外辐射器

小米为其13 Pro提供了快速的UFS 4.0存储，容量为256 GB或512 GB。在选择存储空间时，应牢记不支持microSD。在USB速度方面，小米没有说明其中国网站上安装的USB-C端口的类型，但第一代或第二代的快速USB 3.2端口，工作时数据传输率高，支持有线图像输出，继续令人遗憾地缺席。这里再次使用了2.0标准。

小米智能手机的其他硬件功能包括蓝牙5.3、UWB芯片、屏幕内容的无线图像传输（Miracast）、红外辐射器，以及用于快速连接U盘等外部配件的USB OTG。当然也有一个NFC芯片，包括Play Protect认证。

顶部：麦克风，扬声器，红外辐射器，麦克风
顶部：麦克风，扬声器，红外辐射器，麦克风
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB接口、卡槽
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB接口、卡槽
右侧：音量摇杆，开/关按钮
右侧：音量摇杆，开/关按钮
左侧
左侧

软件 - 小米13 Pro与Android 13

小米在14版中把Android 13与自己的MIUI用户界面相结合。然而，从2022年10月开始的安全补丁并没有保持相当的更新。

的更新保证。小米12系列，即三个主要的Android 更新和四年的安全更新，可能也将适用于欧洲的13系列--小米的高端智能手机将因此更新到Android 16和MIUI 17。然而，购买Galaxy 的S系列智能手机的人，仍然可以得到更多的支持，有四个主要的Android 更新和五年的安全补丁。

与中国版本一样，我们的评测样本不支持谷歌服务，如PlayStore。相反，使用的是中国服务和小米自己的服务。但与华为智能手机不同，你不必没有谷歌服务。谷歌服务框架在交货时已经预装，所以只有PlayStore需要通过内部应用商店手动安装。然而，除了中文和英文之外，没有其他系统语言可以选择。

小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

通信和GNSS - 小米13 Pro带WiFi 7

在家庭无线局域网内，小米13 Pro提供了WiFi 7的快速轴标准，包括6GHz的频率范围，加上（MU-）MIMO技术，在我们的测量中确保了非常高的传输速率。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，小米智能手机在6GHz范围内实现了超过1800MBit/s，在5GHz以下传输时几乎达到1000MBit/s。

除了快速WLAN模块，13 Pro还利用了骁龙X70调制解调器，包括5G标准，但不支持毫米波。此外，我们中国版的小米智能手机支持访问总共16个LTE频段--但与德语国家相关的20和28频段却没有。这个问题将随着小米13 Pro欧洲版本的发布而得到解决，类似于小米12 Pro，它的LTE频率明显多于其中国版本。

Networking
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1465 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1214 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
931 (min: 890) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 965) MBit/s ∼81%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼98%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
932 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 804) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
655 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
692 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼78%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1829 (919-1905)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1603-1672)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (780-871)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (972-1016)
在户外进行本地化
在户外进行本地化
在室内定位
在室内定位

对于定位，小米智能手机采用了广泛的主要卫星选择，从GPS（L1+L5）、GLONASS（G1）、北斗（B1+B1C+B2a）、伽利略（E1+E5a）到QZSS（L1+L5）。为了确定现实世界中的定位精度，我们带着我们的评测样本进行了一次短途自行车骑行，并与Garmin Venu 2并行记录路线，以进行比较。

13 Pro的跟踪能力在大多数情况下是坚实的。然而，在GPS记录的详细视图中可以看到与所选路线的偏差，特别是在改变方向时。尽管如此，小米智能手机非常适用于导航任务，尽管有一些小的不准确之处。

小米13 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2
小米13 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话和语音质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

小米13 Pro智能手机评测

小米13 Pro提供完整的双SIM卡，有两个nano-SIM卡插槽，但不支持eSIM。可以使用VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等功能。内置的麦克风确保了自然的语音体验，这在一定程度上会受到轻微背景噪音的影响。在扬声器模式下，会有轻微的回声。

相机 - 小米智能手机的1英寸传感器

小米13 Pro在纹理模式下的自拍照
小米13 Pro在纹理模式下的自拍照
小米13 Pro在经典模式下的自拍照
小米13 Pro在经典模式下的自拍照

与前代产品相比，小米13 Pro的前置摄像头变化不大。自拍摄像头具有3200万像素的高分辨率，可以提供非常令人印象深刻的照片，具有很高的细节水平。然而，值得注意的是，在 "经典模式 "下，图像会大大曝光过度。

尽管前置摄像头的分辨率很高，但视频录制只可能在30帧/秒的情况下最多达到1080p。竞争对手的智能手机，如三星Galaxy S22 Ultra提供更多的60帧的UHD质量。

背面是1英寸的索尼IMX989，来自小米12S Ultra ，配有OIS。与12S机型一样，小米宣传其与徕卡的合作，这不仅围绕软件，还包括镜头的光学ALD涂层。照片有广泛的图像动态和大量的细节。由于1英寸的传感器，背景大多是模糊的，即使在照片模式下也是如此，这给了照片一种特殊的感觉。用小米13 Pro拍摄的照片不像竞争对手那样经常过度锐化，但我们偶尔会发现照片有点过于柔和。除了一个非常有趣的5000万像素长焦微距摄像头（包括OIS），主摄像头还得到一个超广角摄像头的支持，也是5000万像素。

徕卡在相机软件中提供 "活力 "和 "真实 "模式。第一种模式使色彩更加饱和和明亮，而第二种模式再现了 "徕卡风格 "的镜头，突出了光线和阴暗区域。我们的图像对比照片是在 "Leica Authentic "模式下拍摄的。

徕卡正品
徕卡正品
徕卡Vibrant
徕卡Vibrant

具有3.2倍无损变焦的长焦镜头是基于内部的液体镜头设计，其中包括一个浮动镜头组。镜头分为两组，可以在内部移动，允许聚焦范围从10厘米到理论上的无限远。变焦后的照片具有扎实的基本清晰度，可达到五倍的放大率，这比前者有明显的改进。前代产品.然而，其他高端智能手机，如 Vivo X90 Pro+，有明显更好的变焦质量。

超广角相机很好地控制了镜头的弧度；我们没有发现任何色差。然而，锐度水平不是很明显，特别是在外围区域。

小米13 Pro用主摄像头以24帧/秒的最高8K速度记录动态图片。UHD质量的视频可以以每秒60帧的速度录制。只有在以1080p录制时，才可以在镜头之间切换。

超广角
广角
2倍变焦
3,2倍变焦
10倍变焦
70倍变焦（最大）
宏观
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra wide angleZoom 5x

我们仔细观察了1英寸索尼传感器在受控照明条件下的成像性能。在P3配置文件中，小米13 Pro的内置OLED面板能够完全覆盖色彩空间，与sRGB相比，色彩空间相当大，因此徕卡校准的宽色彩空间也能完全显示。与参考颜色的偏差在典型的智能手机范围内；颜色经常被复制得有点太亮，特别是在绿色调中。

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Pro: 8.85 ∆E min: 2.81 - max: 16.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.7 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
31 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
22 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Pro: 24.61 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 34.86 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米13 Pro带电源装置

小米13 Pro的充电器
小米13 Pro的充电器

中国版的小米13 Pro配备了一个模块化的120瓦电源，一条USB线和一个保护壳外壳。全球版本在多大程度上会受益于充电器，这是值得怀疑的，因为就前代产品而言，这在德国必须单独购买。一个保护膜也被安装在前工程。此外，我们的贷款人TradingShenzhen还为充电器提供了一个欧盟适配器，并为我们的中国版本提供了一个USB-OTG适配器。

小米智能手机的保修期为12个月。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以买家应在购买前与卖家仔细核实。

输入设备和操作 - 小米手机的FaceUnlock功能

小米智能手机的电容式触摸屏受到康宁大猩猩Victus玻璃的保护，具有出色的滑行性能。触摸敏感的表面精确地实现了输入，由于高采样率（240赫兹），刷新率为每秒240次。与前代产品一样，振动马达提供清晰的、触觉上有吸引力的反馈。

一个光学指纹扫描仪再次被集成到显示屏上，用于生物识别安全。小米没有基于超声波的方法的优势，像 三星或 Vivo但内置的传感器反应迅速而可靠。生物识别面部识别也可以通过前置摄像头使用，但由于是二维程序，这不是很安全。

小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

子像素矩阵的再现
子像素矩阵的再现

6.73英寸的LTPO AMOLED显示屏，侧面略有弯曲，来自三星，提供WQHD+分辨率，动态刷新率从1赫兹到120赫兹--我们也可以在系统数据中获取这些数值。然而，为了能够享受10位面板的高像素密度（521 ppi），必须首先在设置中停用出厂默认的FullHD+分辨率。

小米13 Pro的最大亮度被规定为1,900尼特。在纯白的表面上，AMOLED面板在我们的测量中实现了1290cd/m²的峰值，非常好。如果我们在显示屏上抛出一些黑暗区域，亮度会显著增加，在APL18测试中达到1798cd/m²。因此，在我们的测量中，小米智能手机确实非常接近制造商的规格。在，最近的情况往往不是这样的。.

像所有OLED显示屏一样，小米13 Pro的屏幕在整个亮度范围内都会闪烁。我们测量的频率为120赫兹，最高亮度为59%，振幅曲线平缓。在这个亮度极限以上，面板在361和366赫兹之间闪烁。

1215
cd/m²		1245
cd/m²		1290
cd/m²
1211
cd/m²		1230
cd/m²		1280
cd/m²
1209
cd/m²		1239
cd/m²		1279
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1290 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1244.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1230 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73		Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73		Vivo X90 Pro+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.78		Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80		Huawei Mate 50 Pro
AMOLED, 2616x1212, 6.70
Screen
-11%
-6%
7%
3%
-15%
Brightness middle
1230
959
-22%
1109
-10%
1022
-17%
1077
-12%
940
-24%
Brightness
1244
977
-21%
1124
-10%
1025
-18%
1093
-12%
945
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
96
2%
99
5%
97
3%
92
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.1
-10%
1.1
-10%
0.9
10%
1.2
-20%
1.18
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
3.1
-11%
2.7
4%
2.1
25%
2
29%
2.86
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.9
-6%
2
-11%
1.1
39%
1.3
28%
2.1
-17%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
2.37 93%
2.217 99%
CCT
6446 101%
6498 100%
6605 98%
6650 98%
6526 100%
6352 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

小米智能手机有三个颜色配置文件和一个 "自定义 "模式，可以调整颜色空间、温度和强度。我们使用卡尔曼分析软件检查了AMOLED面板的色彩校准。

在出厂设置中（配置文件：原始），sRGB色彩空间被控制，也在很大程度上被覆盖。我们测量的DeltaE值表明颜色的偏差非常小（1.0）。在洋红色中可以看到最小的差异。灰度的再现也显示出在目标范围内的小偏差（<3）。

色彩准确性（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
色彩准确性（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：原始）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.829 ms rise
↘ 0.6365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.287 ms rise
↘ 1.352 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

正如预期的那样，由于非常高的亮度储备，小米13 Pro可以在户外无限制地使用。如果你喜欢在没有亮度传感器的情况下手动调节亮度，最大可达到511cd/m²。在这里，玻璃表面的反射可能相当恼人。

小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

视角稳定性非常好。AMOLED显示屏只是在非常平坦的可视角度下略显冷淡和暗淡。

小米13 Pro智能手机评测

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米13 Pro

在目前的Android 阵营中，它并不比小米13 Pro快多少。骁龙8代2在我们的基准测试中表现非常好，通常会把竞争对手甩在后面。其原因是新的冷冻CPU由四个集群组成，具有不同的ARM架构，包括快速的主核（Cortex-X3），频率高达3.2GHz。

高通公司的SoC在基准测试中表现得非常好。特别是在Geekbench中的多核值非常高。在这里，小米已经能够将性能比12 Pro提高三分之一以上。12 Pro。高通SoC在PCMark中也表现良好。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1489 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=18)
1452 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -30%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
930 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=18)
4945 Points -5%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4786 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4139 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points -42%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=15)
1263746 Points -1%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1262638 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points -25%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
870815 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -45%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=19)
15689 Points +6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points -11%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12748 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)
11756 Points -21%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -23%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11029 Points -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=17)
1154 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1038 Points -15%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1038 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
835 Points -32%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
811 Points -34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=17)
8759 Points +19%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7684 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7178 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -14%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -22%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=17)
13206 Points +22%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12847 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11164 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -10%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -14%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10821, n=17)
9382 Points +30%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7587 Points +5%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7330 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -14%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -29%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=17)
27673 Points +20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22837 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
20111 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -39%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=17)
1749 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1564 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1559 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -14%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63613 Points +303%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +170%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +39%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
16465 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=16)
15326 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3291 Points -79%

在图形测试中， Adreno 740也表现得非常好，有时比同样使用了骁龙8代2.0的vivo X90 Pro+领先近20%。 骁龙8代2.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3173 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2708 Points -28%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -49%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3192 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2775 Points -28%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -47%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14038 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11084 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
490 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
451 fps -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -10%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps -10%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
260 fps -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps -44%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -35%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
218 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
176 fps -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -43%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -38%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -41%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
102 fps -19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -46%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -45%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -26%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -44%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +7%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -49%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -41%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -57%

在日常使用中，以及用Chrome浏览器浏览时，小米智能手机给人留下了极好的印象。感受到的速度以及基准测试结果都是一流的。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=18)
128.9 Points -7%
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110)
116.455 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points -39%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro (Chrome 107)
76.2 Points -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 199, n=14)
124 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -3%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -34%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro (Chome 107)
69.1 runs/min -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110)
139 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=17)
125.5 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
99.9 Points -36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -43%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro (Chrome 107)
69 Points -56%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=20)
44774 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -30%
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110)
27938 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro (Chrome 107)
25168 Points -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110)
1773.4 ms * -157%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro (Chrome 107)
1706.5 ms * -147%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * -132%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -93%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (654 - 1837, n=17)
1049 ms * -52%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -46%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

正如预期，UFS 4.0存储的速度非常高。测量值超过了3500MB/s的读取速度，因此，比在12 Pro中的速度高了一倍多。12 Pro。然而，在日常使用中，这些差异几乎是不明显的。

Xiaomi 13 ProXiaomi 12 ProVivo X90 Pro+Google Pixel 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GHuawei Mate 50 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-3%
-57%
-45%
-41%
-8%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
3587.83
1620
-55%
3397.4
-5%
1346.78
-62%
1653
-54%
1835.8
-49%
3558 ?(3249 - 4384, n=19)
-1%
1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years)
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
2601.45
1465
-44%
2834.4
9%
874.73
-66%
1074
-59%
1104.8
-58%
2443 ?(1014 - 3346, n=19)
-6%
1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years)
-57%
Random Read 4KB
387.72
324.9
-16%
373.88
-4%
219.01
-44%
322.3
-17%
263.4
-32%
414 ?(368 - 460, n=19)
7%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
546.98
448.9
-18%
484.29
-11%
253.18
-54%
273.1
-50%
423.6
-23%
367 ?(152.9 - 595, n=19)
-33%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years)
-50%

游戏--小米智能手机可实现120帧画面

为了评估GPU单元在日常使用中的图形能力，我们用我们的合作伙伴 GameBench的软件工具仔细观察了一些Android 。从纸面上看，强大的 高通-SoC和快速的120赫兹OLED显示屏，响应时间短于4毫秒，有望带来大量的游戏乐趣。

然而，Armajet显示的数值相对较差。起初，我们观察到接近OLED面板原生帧率的高帧率，但这在很短的时间内稳步下降。竞技场射手理论上支持显示屏的全部120赫兹，但小米13 Pro平均只能达到微弱的63 fps。目前还不清楚为什么刷新率这么低，因为这不是由于散热问题。另一方面，在《PUBG Mobile》中，典型的60帧在高清状态下是可能的，而旗舰机在最高细节水平（UHD）下以恒定的40帧运行。

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Pro; Armajet: Ø63.1 (41-121)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (59-60)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø60 (59-61)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (55-61)
Xiaomi 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放 - 小米13 Pro仍然相当稳定

温度

小米13 Pro的外壳在负载下几乎不发热。这家中国制造商使用一种非常薄的散热材料来冷却热源区。登记的最高温度在安全范围内，最高为33℃。然而，旗舰智能手机内部的热量发展导致了高通SoC的性能下降。

Wild Life的压力测试清楚地表明，随着负载的增加，性能下降了约10%至20%，这对于一部智能手机来说是个不错的数值。骁龙8代智能手机.

Max. Load
 30.5 °C30 °C32.9 °C 
 30.4 °C30.4 °C30.6 °C 
 30.2 °C30.4 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
28.2 °C28.4 °C28.2 °C
28.3 °C28.7 °C28.9 °C
28 °C28.4 °C28.9 °C
Maximum: 28.9 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.5 % +6%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 % -43%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 % -53%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 %
Vivo X90 Pro+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87 % -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -30%
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.2 % -36%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.1 (19.4-22)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.4 (19.4-22.3)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15 (9.27-16.5)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (64.6-77.7)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (70.7-80)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Huawei Mate 50 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54.1 (25-64.1)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)
小米13 Pro智能手机评测
小米13 Pro智能手机评测

发言人

小米13 Pro的立体声扬声器再次经过哈曼卡顿的优化，给人以非常好的印象。中音和高音是平衡的，甚至上部的低音范围也有些可闻。然而，在粉红噪声图中可以看到超级高音扬声器的下降。

另外，可以通过USB-C端口连接耳机，或通过蓝牙5.3无线连接。小米13 Pro使用广泛支持的蓝牙编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.837.82526.329.93125.629.14018.624.35030.232.26320.5298019.527.310018.437.512513.643.516011.653.220012532501256.931510.158.140010.159.150010.569.463010.368.2800107010009.874.1125011.372.1160011.274.7200011.476.4250011.978315013.982.1400014.779.850001475.8630014.674.1800013.573.71000013.375.41250013.761.11600013.960.8SPL24.888.5N0.673.5median 12median 72.1Delta1.77.83533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 71.41.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 13 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 13 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米13 Pro配备4820毫安时电池

消耗功率

小米13 Pro使用两个专有芯片来控制充电和电池管理，中国制造商称之为 "浪涌电池管理系统"。充电可以通过USB-C端口进行，功率高达120瓦，也可以通过无线方式进行，最大功率为50瓦。逆向无线充电的最大功率为10瓦，也在船上。除了MI FC 2.0外，还支持QC4或PD3.0等常见的快速充电协议。

在测试中，4820毫安时的电池在20分钟左右就能快速充电到满负荷。小米13 Pro的功耗与上一代产品相当。前辈，尤其是近1.4瓦的空闲值，还有优化的空间。在积极的一面，我们的Geekbench和GFX基准测试结果显示骁龙8代2需要的功率明显低于例如 Vivo X90 Pro+.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.02 / 1.36 / 1.58 Watt
Load midlight 4.29 / 6.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh		Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh		Vivo X90 Pro+
4700 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Huawei Mate 50 Pro
4700 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-5%
6%
-6%
-26%
-25%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
0.94
8%
0.92
10%
0.78
24%
0.58
43%
1.2
-18%
1.052 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=18)
-3%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
1.36
1.24
9%
1.76
-29%
1.61
-18%
0.71
48%
1.5
-10%
1.49 ?(0.8 - 2.16, n=18)
-10%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
1.34
15%
1.88
-19%
1.63
-3%
1.16
27%
1.7
-8%
1.632 ?(1.07 - 2.2, n=18)
-3%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
4.29
5.7
-33%
3.65
15%
3.29
23%
7.07
-65%
6.5
-52%
6.81 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=18)
-59%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Maximum *
6.15
8.12
-32%
6.24
-1%
6.01
2%
11.32
-84%
8.7
-41%
9.29 ?(4.57 - 17.8, n=18)
-51%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-35%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.54 (0.899-8.01)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.3 (1.574-11.4)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.902 (0.867-1.084)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.109-1.298)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.96 (6.61-7.31)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.77 (9.38-10.2)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.902 (0.867-1.084)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.109-1.298)

电池寿命

一个积极的发展是小米13 Pro的电池寿命，即使采用高QHD Plus分辨率和自适应显示控制，其电池寿命也确实不错。在实际的WLAN测试中，小米智能手机的运行时间明显长于其前辈在连续视频播放中约为14小时，而在停用WLAN模块的情况下为21小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Mi Browser 17)
14h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 14min
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh		Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh		Vivo X90 Pro+
4700 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Huawei Mate 50 Pro
4700 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
7%
-14%
19%
2%
Reader / Idle
1509
2036
35%
1210
-20%
1973
31%
1754
16%
H.264
1263
788
-38%
1213
-4%
1078
-15%
1139
-10%
WiFi v1.3
846
766
-9%
905
7%
676
-20%
844
0%
717
-15%
Load
254
337
33%
226
-11%
410
61%
296
17%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳
+ 更快的SoC
+ 明亮、高分辨率的面板
+ 快速的 UFS 存储
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的主摄像头

Cons

- 前置摄像头没有 UHD 选项
- 只有USB2.0
- 超广角和长焦摄像头最多只能算是稳固的。
- 更新支持仍可改进

对小米13 Pro的评判

在审查中。小米13 Pro。样品设备由TradingShenzhen提供。
在审查中。小米13 Pro。样品设备由TradingShenzhen提供。

小米13 Pro在很多方面都比去年的13 Pro做得更好。12 Pro.从更好的相机包开始，积极的趋势还在继续，更明亮的显示屏和防水外壳。在这里，小米与竞争对手持平。那些被变焦功能的轻微不足所困扰的人应该仔细看看vivo X90 Pro+。

小米智能手机在性能方面也不必回避，因为这家中国制造商从 骁龙8代2的性能，甚至能够缩小与 Apple A16 Bionic的差距。 Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 在某些情况下（Geekbench多分数）。由于高通SoC的效率，小米13 Pro还拥有非常吸引人的电池寿命。

小米13 Pro在很多方面都做得很好。我们只希望小米能尽快用完过时的USB组件。

与小米前几代高端智能手机一样，我们再次无法理解硬件方面的两点。首先，这家中国制造商再次在其2023参考模型中安装了一个缓慢的USB 2.0端口，没有图像输出选项，尽管 竞争对手多年来一直在提供更好的服务。其次，小米再次未能为一个拥有3200万像素、分辨率为8000×4000的前置摄像头提供UHD选项。

除此之外，我们没有发现很多反对购买小米13 Pro的理由。对于那些认为专业机型太大的人来说， 小米13是一款更紧凑的智能手机。在未来，我们希望看到更长的软件支持，如三星或 谷歌以及一个现代的超声波指纹传感器。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米13 Pro尚未在中国以外的国家上市，但买家可以考虑在Giztop购买同样支持英语（除中文外）的中文版。.

起价以美元（799.00美元）、英镑 （711.11英镑）、欧元 （799.00欧元）、加元 （1110.61美元）、澳元 （1190.51美元）、港币 （6312.10美元）、印度卢比 （47,940.00英镑）、日元 （119,051日元）、台币 ($24,769.00)、卢布 (39,950.00)和新加坡元 ($1,086.64).

上述价格截止到2023年2月15日，可能会有变化。

Xiaomi 13 Pro - 02/13/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
87%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
72 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
78%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米13 Pro评测。配备徕卡相机的高质量智能手机，但也有两个主要缺点
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-02-16 (Update: 2023-02-16)