谷歌 Pixel 8 智能手机评测:小巧精致,7 年更新
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % | 11/2023 | Google Pixel 8 Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2400x1080 | |
88.5 % | 11/2022 | Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" | 2400x1080 | |
89.1 % | 10/2023 | Apple iPhone 15 A16, A16 GPU 5-Core | 171 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.10" | 2556x1179 | |
89.1 % | 02/2023 | Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.36" | 2400x1080 | |
86.8 % | 07/2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9 | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
90.5 % | 03/2023 | Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 167 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护壳 - 带大猩猩胜利玻璃的紧凑型 Pixel 8
谷歌为 Pixel 8 选择了哑光金属边框,边框由天线条分割。正面和背面使用了大猩猩玻璃。显示屏边缘均匀纤薄,令人赏心悦目。Pixel 8 采用 IP68 防护等级,可防止灰尘和水侵入。
。
摄像头位于 Pixel 典型的条形摄像头中,明显突出于设备。摄像头横杆延伸至设备的整个宽度,这意味着设备放在桌子上时不会晃动。玻璃表面光亮,容易沾染指纹,而且摄像头驼峰上也会聚集大量灰尘。
扭转刚性非常好,但设备很容易被压缩。在显示屏上进行输入时,设备会发出轻微的空音,这一点加深了人们的印象。按键采用典型的像素排列,电源键位于音量摇杆上方。按键的着力点不错,但也略显松散。
设备 - 配备 NFC 和双卡双待功能的 Pixel 8
谷歌在 Pixel 8 中使用了自己的 SoC,即张量 G3。这款智能手机支持 NFC 和双卡双待。可以插入实体 SIM 卡,也可以存储 eSIM 卡。存储空间不可扩展。制造商安装了一个 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 端口,支持 exFAT 格式,但不支持 NTFS。这意味着无法输出图像。
在我们使用华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中的三星 980 Pro 进行的拷贝测试中,Pixel 8 的最高速度达到了 102.15 MB/s。因此,USB 端口的速度相当慢。
软件 - 谷歌承诺 7 年更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 Pixel 8
在无线标准方面,Pixel 8 也是面向未来的,因为它支持 WiFi 7。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时,传输速率非常稳定,与前代产品基本持平,达到了标准级别。只有三星Galaxy S23 在 5 GHz 范围内表现明显突出。
说到移动通信,Pixel 8 自然支持 5G。频率覆盖非常好。Pixel 8 支持 27 个 LTE 频段和 21 个 5G 频段,因此全球蜂窝网络覆盖不成问题。在日常使用中,该设备的接收效果并不突出。Pixel 8 支持双卡双待,可以是一张实体卡和一张 eSIM 卡,也可以是两张 eSIM 卡。Pixel 8 还支持 WiFi 电话和 VoLTE。
Networking | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Google Pixel 7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple iPhone 15 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi 13 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Motorola Edge 40 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
电话和语音质量 - Pixel 8 上清晰的通话质量
谷歌为 Pixel 8 使用了自己的手机应用程序。软件结构清晰,不会造成混乱。我们非常喜欢它的语音质量。无论是 Pixel 用户还是对话伙伴,都能清晰地传输语音,没有背景噪音。智能手机在任何时候都有足够的音量,并能很好地过滤背景噪音。通过 "水晶般清晰的通话 "功能,谷歌提高了智能手机本已很好的噪音过滤能力。
通过扬声器通话的质量也很好。虽然切换很明显,但通话质量仍然不错。在高音量时,智能手机的边框会明显震动。
摄像头 - 普通像素 8,不带变焦镜头
摄像头历来是 Pixel 智能手机的强项。Pixel 8 延续了这一传统,并带来了令人印象深刻的效果。其中一些图像经过谷歌软件的大量处理,动态范围大,对比度强。
谷歌为 Pixel 8 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头和 1200 万像素超广角镜头。谷歌Pixel 7评测--小巧的谷歌智能手机没有大的折衷方案只有 Pixel 8 Pro 才配备了新的 4800 万像素超广角镜头。尽管如此,超广角摄像头拍摄的照片也很令人满意;周边区域的锐度略有下降。
与 Pixel 8 Pro 不同,普通 Pixel 8 没有变焦镜头;变焦仅通过数字方式实现。在放大 2 倍时效果不错,但放大 5 倍时,图像会严重过大,图像噪点清晰可见。无法实现超过 8 倍的变焦。
智能手机有一个默认激活的微距模式。如果软件检测到相机前方有近距离物体,它就会自动启动。这样就能在短距离内拍摄出清晰的照片。智能手机使用超广角摄像头进行拍摄,色彩平衡与主摄像头略有不同。此外,还有用于长时间曝光、拍摄移动物体和夜景的特殊模式。Pixel 8 不提供专业或手动模式,但可以手动设置白平衡。
。
自拍相机拍摄的照片令人愉悦,人像模式也非常可靠。不过,1050 万像素的分辨率相当低。前置摄像头还可以拍摄长时间曝光和动作照片。
所有摄像头都能以最高 4K 和 60 FPS 的速度拍摄视频。Pixel 8 还支持 10 位 HDR 录制。4K 录像质量令人满意。视频防抖动和自动对焦功能运行可靠,音频录制效果也不错。在 HDR 视频中,平移时图像会略微失真。
谷歌还提供了其他视频选项,如具有更好防抖功能的平移模式、背景模糊的视频(24 FPS)、慢动作和延时拍摄。拍摄时,智能手机背面会明显发热。
谷歌的 "魔法编辑器 "是一项新功能,它可以在人工智能的帮助下对图像进行事后编辑。其功能范围包括移除物体、调整天空颜色、风格化或抽象化图像。并不是所有的功能都能在所有的图像中实现;在某些情况下,软件必须自己提出功能建议。不过,图像必须保存在云端进行编辑,程序在这方面也需要时间。编辑后的效果可能大相径庭:有时软件会产生令人印象深刻的效果,有时图像则无法使用。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Plush toy rabbitLakeUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light说到 Pixel 摄像头的色彩准确度,没有什么大的惊喜。最大的偏差在于白色,白色显示得过暖。图像清晰度非常好,即使在边缘区域也是如此。在可控弱光(1 勒克斯)下拍摄的照片也令人印象深刻。颜色和形状非常容易辨认,但清晰度有所下降。


配件和保修 - Google 还节省了电源装置的费用
谷歌 Pixel 8 的交货范围非常简单。除智能手机外,包装中仅包含一条 USB 数据线(USB-C 至 USB-C)和一个 USB-A 至 USB-C 适配器。电源适配器或手机壳需单独订购。
谷歌在德国为 Pixel 8 提供 24 个月的保修服务,其他国家可能有所不同。不提供延保服务。另一方面,备件的保修期为 7 年。谷歌在自己的商店里为这款智能手机提供各种保护套。
输入设备和操作 - 没有问题的像素手指扫描仪
显示屏 - Pixel 8 的最高亮度
谷歌为 Pixel 8 提供了 120 Hz 的更高刷新率。不过,这并不是 LTPO 显示屏,面板只能以 60 或 120 Hz 的频率显示内容。
6.2 英寸 OLED 面板在最大亮度下非常闪亮。在观看 HDR 内容时,我们测得的平均亮度为 1410 cd/m²,最高亮度为 1930 nits,因此这款智能手机几乎达到了谷歌宣传的 2000 cd/m²。这些数值都是在亮度传感器激活的情况下达到的。在没有传感器的情况下,最大亮度为 1024 尼特。
面板的分辨率为 428 ppi,内容在任何时候都能清晰显示。黑阶和对比度都非常完美。不过,我们在测量中也发现了屏幕闪烁现象:平均频率为 170 Hz。最小闪烁频率为 120 Hz,最大为 240 Hz。Pixel 8 支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1450 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Google Pixel 8 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20 | Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30 | Apple iPhone 15 Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10 | Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36 | Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -2% | -11% | -1% | -23% | -51% | |
Brightness middle | 1450 | 936 -35% | 1046 -28% | 1209 -17% | 1023 -29% | 1125 -22% |
Brightness | 1410 | 947 -33% | 1019 -28% | 1208 -14% | 1042 -26% | 1122 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 95 3% | 94 2% | 98 7% | 90 -2% | 96 4% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.3 -18% | 1.4 -27% | 1.2 -9% | 1.6 -45% | 3.2 -191% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 2.7 36% | 2.84 32% | 3 29% | 4.3 -2% | 4.9 -17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.4 33% | 2.4 -14% | 2.1 -0% | 2.8 -33% | 3.3 -57% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.158 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% | 1.97 112% |
CCT | 6584 99% | 6664 98% | 6410 101% | 6504 100% | 6457 101% | 6504 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 170 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 170 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 170 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6165 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7305 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.064 ms rise | |
↘ 3.45 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
性能 - 张量 G3 落后于骁龙处理器
谷歌使用自己最新版本的 SoC,即Tensor G3在基准测试中,与 张量 G2在 像素 7.三星 Galaxy S23和 小米 13则不同,它们的 骁龙 8 代 2。
只有在 UL Procyon AI Inference 基准测试中,Pixel 8 才领先于骁龙设备,但被 Pixel 7 击败。在日常使用中,Pixel 8 的性能令人印象深刻。大型应用程序的打开速度很快,UI 运行没有任何卡顿。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (1260 - 1274, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (3395 - 3624, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=219, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Single-Core | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (1653 - 1769, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Multi-Core | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (4225 - 4538, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7244, n=59, last 2 years) |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (603046 - 896410, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1478071, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Google Pixel 8 |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (10897 - 11824, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 19783, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (935 - 955, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1408, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (25563 - 27018, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 128240, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (1109 - 1136, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 7 |
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average of class Smartphone (461567 - 1562239, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (1107295 - 1113506, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 |
在 GPU 性能方面也出现了类似的情况。谷歌安装了Mali-G715 MP7图形处理器,与 Mali-G710 MP7和 谷歌 Pixel 7在基准测试中的差距微乎其微。在某些情况下,前代产品的测试值甚至略胜一筹。
小米 小米 13和 三星Galaxy S23 - 都配备了 Adreno 740 -的性能要好得多。Pixel 8 的图形处理器不具备光线追踪功能。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 15 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 15 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Motorola Edge 40 |
浏览器基准测试的结果与之前的测试结果一致:Pixel 8 的性能处于良好水平,但三星Galaxy S23 和Apple iPhone 15 的性能甚至更好。
在日常冲浪过程中不会出现任何问题。网页加载速度很快。得益于 120 Hz 的显示屏,滚动也非常流畅。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (104.3 - 105.2, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Average of class Smartphone (21.2 - 351, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (136 - 158, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (94 - 103, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 202, n=125, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117) | |
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (115 - 129, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (47776 - 49506, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Average Google Tensor G3 (840 - 998, n=2) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117) |
* ... smaller is better
谷歌 Pixel 8 安装了 UFS 3.1 存储系统。无法通过 microSD 卡进行内存扩展。日常使用中未发现存储速度异常。我们的存储基准测试无法在Android 14 上运行 - 我们正在研究解决方案。
游戏 - 在 Pixel 8 上以最高分辨率运行的最新游戏
排放--谷歌智能手机几乎没有节流功能
温度 - 张力 G3 不会太热
Pixel 8 在最大负载下会明显发热。我们测得的平均温度约为 40 度。这意味着智能手机可以始终保持在可操作状态。
在日常使用中,Pixel 8 通常会保持舒适的温度。只有在玩游戏或看电影时,设备才会明显发热,但不会让人感到不舒服。不仅正面和背面会发热,边框也会发热。
Pixel 8 在 Wild Life Stress Test 稳定性测试和 Wild Life Extreme Stress Test 极端压力测试中表现良好。智能手机的性能会受到影响,但不会像像素 7或 三星Galaxy S23.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
扬声器 - Pixel 8 的立体声效果非常出色
谷歌为 Pixel 8 配备了立体声扬声器,而且效果非常好。下部扬声器向下发射,而上部扬声器则与耳罩融为一体。尤其是中频的还原非常线性,这是 Pixel 7 的又一进步。不过,低音和低频比较弱,即使对于智能手机来说也是如此。
Pixel 8 可以在不失真情况下提高音量。也几乎没有振动。虽然智能手机没有插孔输出,但我们可以顺利连接蓝牙耳机。支持以下编解码器:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。
Google Pixel 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 优于 Pixel 7
能源消耗 - 在最低能源消耗方面取得的进展
与前代产品相比,Pixel 7 的功耗发生了变化。 像素 7.虽然 Pixel 8 在空闲模式下更省电,但在满载模式下功耗更高。不过,我们现在使用 Burnout 基准进行最大值测量,因此这些值不具有可比性。
在其他测量值中,Pixel 设备的表现接近。三星Galaxy S23 在最低消耗方面不相上下,但在所有其他方面都明显更经济。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Average Google Tensor G3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | -15% | 11% | -13% | 27% | -8% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.56 | 0.89 -59% | 0.9 -61% | 0.76 -36% | 0.62 -11% | 0.57 -2% | 0.595 ? -6% | 0.89 ? -59% |
Idle Average * | 1.08 | 1.07 1% | 1 7% | 1.1 -2% | 1.78 -65% | 0.74 31% | 1.275 ? -18% | 1.464 ? -36% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.17 | 1.2 -3% | 1.1 6% | 1.13 3% | 1.85 -58% | 0.83 29% | 1.36 ? -16% | 1.669 ? -43% |
Load Average * | 8.01 | 3.27 59% | 6 25% | 2.99 63% | 3.02 62% | 4.26 47% | 8.23 ? -3% | 4.84 ? 40% |
Load Maximum * | 8.89 | 5.5 38% | 13.6 -53% | 6.63 25% | 8.23 7% | 6.16 31% | 8.76 ? 1% | 7.71 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池续航时间 - Pixel 8 安全度过一天
我们对 Pixel 8 进行了各种电池测试。在日常 WiFi 测试中,Pixel 8 的续航时间达到了 13.5 小时,比 Pixel 7 有了显著提高,但其他对比设备的续航时间都更长。
不过,在连续循环播放视频时,Pixel 8 却大放异彩,在对比设备中遥遥领先。由于改用了 Burnout 基准,满负荷下的实际运行时间几乎没有可比性。
在日常使用中,Pixel 8 可以很好地坚持一天,如果避免长时间通话和游戏,甚至可以坚持 1.5 天。有线充电的最大功率为 30 瓦。这款智能手机还支持通过 Qi 标准进行无线充电,Pixel Stand 2 的最大功率为 18 瓦,其他 Qi 充电器的最大功率为 12 瓦。
。
通过 18 瓦的谷歌电源,Pixel 8 可以在一小时内从 0% 充电到 84%。充满电需要 87 分钟。
Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 37% | 55% | 26% | 34% | |
Reader / Idle | 1493 | 1063 -29% | 2698 81% | 2983 100% | 2272 52% | 2249 51% |
H.264 | 1363 | 1230 -10% | 1305 -4% | 1221 -10% | 1235 -9% | 1255 -8% |
WiFi v1.3 | 814 | 731 -10% | 1002 23% | 1021 25% | 924 14% | 926 14% |
Load | 205 | 302 47% | 306 49% | 423 106% | 304 48% | 370 80% |
Pros
Cons
Verdic - 全面的整体软件包,可提高更新速度
与上一代产品相比,谷歌在多个方面对 Pixel 8 进行了改进。新款 Pixel 展示了坚实的创新进步,但并不代表进化的飞跃。机身变得更小,使其成为与 Pro 并驾齐驱的紧凑型设备。
普通版 Pixel 的显示屏现在可以达到 120 Hz,而且亮度极高。智能手机的摄像头也令人印象深刻,在任何光线条件下都能拍摄出精彩的照片,许多新的视频功能也令人印象深刻。归根结底,与 像素 8 Pro在摄像头方面的区别就很明显了。
新的 谷歌张量 G3性能良好,但还达不到配备 骁龙 8 代 2.内置图形处理器也是如此。Pixel 8 的性能足以满足日常使用需求,但在同价位产品中并不占优势。
遗憾的是,谷歌没有选择最新的 UFS 4.0 存储。USB-C 端口也不尽如人意,没有图像输出,传输速率也很慢。新的人工智能图像处理功能给人留下了矛盾的印象。偶尔会有令人印象深刻的效果,但并非总是如此。此外,图像必须在云端备份,而且工作速度还有待提高。
除了纯粹的性能之外,Pixel 8 整体而言是一款成功的智能手机,其更新供应时间非常长。
谷歌新的更新承诺则值得称赞。制造商打算在七年内为 Pixel 8 系列提供更新。在此期间,还将提供备件。这可能会让 Pixel 8 成为真正的长跑运动员。如果该设备能使用如此长的时间,那么(与其前代产品相比)增加的价格也就不言而喻了。
三星 三星Galaxy S23功能更强大一些,也提供了很好的更新。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Edge 40要便宜得多,而且还带有Android 。
价格和供应情况
Google Pixel 8
-
11/14/2023 v7
Benedikt Winkel
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.