谷歌 Pixel 8 智能手机评测：小巧精致，7 年更新

Name: Google Pixel 8
Brand: Google

持久耐用。 与前代产品相比，Pixel 8 是一款全面改进的智能手机。这款新机不仅拥有明亮的 120 Hz 显示屏和终于可以正常工作的指纹识别器，其最大的创新还在于超长的更新支持，直到 2030 年。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

谷歌延续了 Pixel 设备的传统，坚持双设备战术：除了普通的 Pixel 8，该制造商还提供了一款 Pixel 8 Pro，配备了更大的电池、更大的显示屏和变焦摄像头。对于普通版的 Pixel 8，谷歌主要依靠外形设计，使设备更加紧凑。当前 Pixel 系列的一大特点是支持扩展更新：制造商计划在 7 年内为设备提供新软件。

谷歌提供三种不同颜色的 Pixel 8：

Hazel （灰色）、Obsidian （黑色）和Rose（粉红色）。这款智能手机有 128 或 256 GB 存储空间可供选择。我们的测试机为黑色，存储空间为 128 GB。

Test device courtesy of Google Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 8 (Pixel 8 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G3 9 x 1.7 - 2.9 GHz, Zuma - Cortex X3 / A715 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G715 MP7

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.20 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, capacitive, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 114 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Magnetometer, Barometer

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS (Band 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 8/ 19); LTE (B1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 13/ 14/ 17/ 18/ 19/ 20/ 25/ 26/ 28/ 30/ 32/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 42/ 46/ 48/ 66/ 71); 5G (sub-6 n1/ 2/ 3/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 20/ 25/ 26/ 28/ 30/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 66/ 71/ 75/ 76/ 77/ 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 150.5 x 70.8

Battery

4575 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (ƒ/1.68, pixel size 1.2 μm, Field of view 82°, Image sensor size 1/1.31"), 12 Mpix (ultrawide, ƒ/2.2, pixel size 1.25 μm, Field of view 125.8°)
Secondary Camera: 10.5 MPix (ƒ/2.2, pixel size 1.22 μm, Field of view 95°)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: on screen, USB-cable (USB-C to USB-C); SIM-tool; USB-A to USB-C adapter, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5); Glonass: (L1); Galileo (E1, E5a); BeiDou (B1, B2a); SAR-Head: 0.98 W/kg, SAR-Body 1.20 W/kg; HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; DRM Widevine L1; Camera2 API: full, fanless, waterproof

Weight

187 g

Price

799 Euro

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.9 %	11/2023	Google Pixel 8 Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	187 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.20"	2400x1080
88.5 %	11/2022	Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	197 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30"	2400x1080
89.1 %	10/2023	Apple iPhone 15 A16, A16 GPU 5-Core	171 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2556x1179
89.1 %	02/2023	Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	189 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.36"	2400x1080
86.8 %	07/2023	Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9	171 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
90.5 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080

保护壳 - 带大猩猩胜利玻璃的紧凑型 Pixel 8

谷歌为 Pixel 8 选择了哑光金属边框，边框由天线条分割。正面和背面使用了大猩猩玻璃。显示屏边缘均匀纤薄，令人赏心悦目。Pixel 8 采用 IP68 防护等级，可防止灰尘和水侵入。
。

摄像头位于 Pixel 典型的条形摄像头中，明显突出于设备。摄像头横杆延伸至设备的整个宽度，这意味着设备放在桌子上时不会晃动。玻璃表面光亮，容易沾染指纹，而且摄像头驼峰上也会聚集大量灰尘。

扭转刚性非常好，但设备很容易被压缩。在显示屏上进行输入时，设备会发出轻微的空音，这一点加深了人们的印象。按键采用典型的像素排列，电源键位于音量摇杆上方。按键的着力点不错，但也略显松散。

设备 - 配备 NFC 和双卡双待功能的 Pixel 8

谷歌在 Pixel 8 中使用了自己的 SoC，即张量 G3。这款智能手机支持 NFC 和双卡双待。可以插入实体 SIM 卡，也可以存储 eSIM 卡。存储空间不可扩展。制造商安装了一个 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 端口，支持 exFAT 格式，但不支持 NTFS。这意味着无法输出图像。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中的三星 980 Pro 进行的拷贝测试中，Pixel 8 的最高速度达到了 102.15 MB/s。因此，USB 端口的速度相当慢。

软件 - 谷歌承诺 7 年更新

Pixel 8 预装了Android 14。谷歌专门为该设备提供了自己的应用程序，因此系统相当精简，仅占用 14 GB。VanillaAndroid 扩展了一些 Pixel 功能和应用程序，如 Pixel Recorder，它可以自动转录。关键字可用于搜索录音。使用谷歌助手自动接听电话也是 Pixel 独有的功能。
。

除了这些功能外，Android ，还可以使用 "Material You "自定义外观。最重要的软件方面是谷歌新的七年更新承诺，其中包括版本和安全更新。此外，谷歌还将继续提供 "功能降级"，为 Pixel 设备增加新功能。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 Pixel 8

在无线标准方面，Pixel 8 也是面向未来的，因为它支持 WiFi 7。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，传输速率非常稳定，与前代产品基本持平，达到了标准级别。只有三星Galaxy S23 在 5 GHz 范围内表现明显突出。

说到移动通信，Pixel 8 自然支持 5G。频率覆盖非常好。Pixel 8 支持 27 个 LTE 频段和 21 个 5G 频段，因此全球蜂窝网络覆盖不成问题。在日常使用中，该设备的接收效果并不突出。Pixel 8 支持双卡双待，可以是一张实体卡和一张 eSIM 卡，也可以是两张 eSIM 卡。Pixel 8 还支持 WiFi 电话和 VoLTE。

Networking
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000	891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼87%
Google Pixel 7
iperf3 receive AXE11000	904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15
iperf3 receive AXE11000	691 (min: 617) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	773 (min: 576) MBit/s ∼44%
Xiaomi 13
iperf3 receive AXE11000	894 (min: 803) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	770 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1894 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1656 (min: 1620) MBit/s ∼94%
Motorola Edge 40
iperf3 receive AXE11000	839 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	942 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	649 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	686 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1537 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1360 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼77%

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1570 (1043-1725)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (845-1757)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1325-1685)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1756 (1694-1797)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (440-911)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (816-917)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (459-948)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (863-963)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)

谷歌 Pixel 8 支持所有常见的卫星系统。不过，在室内定位需要几秒钟，而且不是特别精确。而在室外则要快得多。我们还将谷歌 Pixel 8 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了对比。在大多数情况下，这款智能手机的追踪能力令人信服。不过，在某些地区，记录的路线与存储地图上的路线并不一致。在日常使用中，以谷歌地图为例，导航功能完全没有问题。

电话和语音质量 - Pixel 8 上清晰的通话质量

谷歌为 Pixel 8 使用了自己的手机应用程序。软件结构清晰，不会造成混乱。我们非常喜欢它的语音质量。无论是 Pixel 用户还是对话伙伴，都能清晰地传输语音，没有背景噪音。智能手机在任何时候都有足够的音量，并能很好地过滤背景噪音。通过 "水晶般清晰的通话 "功能，谷歌提高了智能手机本已很好的噪音过滤能力。

通过扬声器通话的质量也很好。虽然切换很明显，但通话质量仍然不错。在高音量时，智能手机的边框会明显震动。

摄像头 - 普通像素 8，不带变焦镜头

摄像头历来是 Pixel 智能手机的强项。Pixel 8 延续了这一传统，并带来了令人印象深刻的效果。其中一些图像经过谷歌软件的大量处理，动态范围大，对比度强。

谷歌为 Pixel 8 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头和 1200 万像素超广角镜头。谷歌Pixel 7评测--小巧的谷歌智能手机没有大的折衷方案只有 Pixel 8 Pro 才配备了新的 4800 万像素超广角镜头。尽管如此，超广角摄像头拍摄的照片也很令人满意；周边区域的锐度略有下降。

与 Pixel 8 Pro 不同，普通 Pixel 8 没有变焦镜头；变焦仅通过数字方式实现。在放大 2 倍时效果不错，但放大 5 倍时，图像会严重过大，图像噪点清晰可见。无法实现超过 8 倍的变焦。

智能手机有一个默认激活的微距模式。如果软件检测到相机前方有近距离物体，它就会自动启动。这样就能在短距离内拍摄出清晰的照片。智能手机使用超广角摄像头进行拍摄，色彩平衡与主摄像头略有不同。此外，还有用于长时间曝光、拍摄移动物体和夜景的特殊模式。Pixel 8 不提供专业或手动模式，但可以手动设置白平衡。
。

自拍相机拍摄的照片令人愉悦，人像模式也非常可靠。不过，1050 万像素的分辨率相当低。前置摄像头还可以拍摄长时间曝光和动作照片。

所有摄像头都能以最高 4K 和 60 FPS 的速度拍摄视频。Pixel 8 还支持 10 位 HDR 录制。4K 录像质量令人满意。视频防抖动和自动对焦功能运行可靠，音频录制效果也不错。在 HDR 视频中，平移时图像会略微失真。

谷歌还提供了其他视频选项，如具有更好防抖功能的平移模式、背景模糊的视频（24 FPS）、慢动作和延时拍摄。拍摄时，智能手机背面会明显发热。

谷歌的 "魔法编辑器 "是一项新功能，它可以在人工智能的帮助下对图像进行事后编辑。其功能范围包括移除物体、调整天空颜色、风格化或抽象化图像。并不是所有的功能都能在所有的图像中实现；在某些情况下，软件必须自己提出功能建议。不过，图像必须保存在云端进行编辑，程序在这方面也需要时间。编辑后的效果可能大相径庭：有时软件会产生令人印象深刻的效果，有时图像则无法使用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plush toy rabbit Lake Ultra wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

说到 Pixel 摄像头的色彩准确度，没有什么大的惊喜。最大的偏差在于白色，白色显示得过暖。图像清晰度非常好，即使在边缘区域也是如此。在可控弱光（1 勒克斯）下拍摄的照片也令人印象深刻。颜色和形状非常容易辨认，但清晰度有所下降。

ColorChecker Google Pixel 8: 5.3 ∆E min: 0.58 - max: 11.35 ∆E

配件和保修 - Google 还节省了电源装置的费用

谷歌 Pixel 8 的交货范围非常简单。除智能手机外，包装中仅包含一条 USB 数据线（USB-C 至 USB-C）和一个 USB-A 至 USB-C 适配器。电源适配器或手机壳需单独订购。

谷歌在德国为 Pixel 8 提供 24 个月的保修服务，其他国家可能有所不同。不提供延保服务。另一方面，备件的保修期为 7 年。谷歌在自己的商店里为这款智能手机提供各种保护套。

输入设备和操作 - 没有问题的像素手指扫描仪

谷歌在 Pixel 8 上使用了自己的 GBoard 键盘。这意味着在纵向和横向模式下都能可靠无误地输入。智能手机的屏幕总体上给人留下了良好的滑动印象。不过，边角的输入（例如游戏时）并不总是能直接实现。

智能手机可以通过显示屏上的光学指纹或 2D 面部识别解锁。这两种方式都能快速可靠地工作。在测试 Pixel 8 时，我们没有遇到前几代 Pixel 在显示屏指纹扫描仪上遇到的任何问题。直持设备即可激活面部识别，如果需要，还可以跳过锁屏。

显示屏 - Pixel 8 的最高亮度

谷歌为 Pixel 8 提供了 120 Hz 的更高刷新率。不过，这并不是 LTPO 显示屏，面板只能以 60 或 120 Hz 的频率显示内容。

6.2 英寸 OLED 面板在最大亮度下非常闪亮。在观看 HDR 内容时，我们测得的平均亮度为 1410 cd/m²，最高亮度为 1930 nits，因此这款智能手机几乎达到了谷歌宣传的 2000 cd/m²。这些数值都是在亮度传感器激活的情况下达到的。在没有传感器的情况下，最大亮度为 1024 尼特。

面板的分辨率为 428 ppi，内容在任何时候都能清晰显示。黑阶和对比度都非常完美。不过，我们在测量中也发现了屏幕闪烁现象：平均频率为 170 Hz。最小闪烁频率为 120 Hz，最大为 240 Hz。Pixel 8 支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。


1447 cd/m²	1434 cd/m²	1369 cd/m²
1453 cd/m²	1450 cd/m²	1378 cd/m²
1401 cd/m²	1414 cd/m²	1340 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1453 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1409.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1450 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Google Pixel 8 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20	Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30	Apple iPhone 15 Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10	Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36	Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10
Screen		-2%	-11%	-1%	-23%	-51%
Brightness middle	1450	936 -35%	1046 -28%	1209 -17%	1023 -29%	1125 -22%
Brightness	1410	947 -33%	1019 -28%	1208 -14%	1042 -26%	1122 -20%
Brightness Distribution	92	95 3%	94 2%	98 7%	90 -2%	96 4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	1.3 -18%	1.4 -27%	1.2 -9%	1.6 -45%	3.2 -191%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.2	2.7 36%	2.84 32%	3 29%	4.3 -2%	4.9 -17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	1.4 33%	2.4 -14%	2.1 -0%	2.8 -33%	3.3 -57%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.158 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	1.97 ^112%
CCT	6584 ^99%	6664 ^98%	6410 ^101%	6504 ^100%	6457 ^101%	6504 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

170 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 170 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 170 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

显示屏的色彩保真度很高。色彩偏差低于可感知的范围，灰度仅略微偏大，尤其是白色值。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6165 ms rise
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7305 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.064 ms rise
5.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.45 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

得益于面板出色的最大亮度值，Pixel 8 在阳光下非常易于阅读。自动亮度调节功能运行快速、可靠。

Pixel 8 的视角稳定性非常好。陡峭角度下的内容清晰可辨。不过，在陡峭角度观看时会有轻微的褐色/灰色雾影。

性能 - 张量 G3 落后于骁龙处理器

谷歌使用自己最新版本的 SoC，即Tensor G3在基准测试中，与张量 G2在像素 7.三星 Galaxy S23和小米 13则不同，它们的骁龙 8 代 2。

只有在 UL Procyon AI Inference 基准测试中，Pixel 8 才领先于骁龙设备，但被 Pixel 7 击败。在日常使用中，Pixel 8 的性能令人印象深刻。大型应用程序的打开速度很快，UI 运行没有任何卡顿。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1884 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1549 Points +23%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1478 Points +17%
Average Google Tensor G3 (1260 - 1274, n=2)	1267 Points +1%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1260 Points
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1050 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	835 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	5090 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	4974 Points +47%
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4688 Points +38%
Average Google Tensor G3 (3395 - 3624, n=2)	3510 Points +3%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	3395 Points
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	3310 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3265 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2997 Points -12%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2465 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1984 Points +20%
Average Google Tensor G3 (1653 - 1769, n=2)	1711 Points +4%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1653 Points
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=108, last 2 years)	1372 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	1120 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	6019 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	5149 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G3 (4225 - 4538, n=2)	4382 Points +4%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4225 Points
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=108, last 2 years)	3793 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	3617 Points -14%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1373449 Points +128%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1273775 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1134684 Points +88%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	773655 Points +28%
Average Google Tensor G3 (603046 - 896410, n=2)	749728 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=152, last 2 years)	744199 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	687619 Points +14%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	603046 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	16611 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	15270 Points +40%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	14094 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11807 Points +8%
Average Google Tensor G3 (10897 - 11824, n=2)	11361 Points +4%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	10897 Points
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	10530 Points -3%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1260 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1221 Points +28%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1219 Points +28%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	955 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (935 - 955, n=2)	945 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	898 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)	842 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	620 Points -35%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	42556 Points +66%
Average Google Tensor G3 (25563 - 27018, n=2)	26291 Points +3%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	25563 Points
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)	21932 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	21840 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	16702 Points -35%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	15961 Points -38%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	26368 Points +2221%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +1470%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	11860 Points +944%
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1410 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1320 Points +16%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1136 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (1109 - 1136, n=2)	1123 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1002 Points -12%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1508318 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (281399 - 2162423, n=52, last 2 years)	1240541 Points +12%
Average Google Tensor G3 (1107295 - 1113506, n=2)	1110401 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1107295 Points

在 GPU 性能方面也出现了类似的情况。谷歌安装了Mali-G715 MP7图形处理器，与 Mali-G710 MP7和谷歌 Pixel 7在基准测试中的差距微乎其微。在某些情况下，前代产品的测试值甚至略胜一筹。

小米小米 13和三星Galaxy S23 - 都配备了 Adreno 740 -的性能要好得多。Pixel 8 的图形处理器不具备光线追踪功能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3707 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3699 Points +52%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2439 Points
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2411 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1800 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1228 Points -50%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3857 Points +59%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3751 Points +55%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2409 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1841 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1262 Points -48%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14002 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13911 Points +55%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	12092 Points +35%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8977 Points
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6660 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4405 Points -51%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8635 Points
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6513 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4490 Points -48%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6185 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5415 Points +8%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4995 Points
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4177 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4086 Points -18%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25306 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21767 Points +61%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13546 Points
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11491 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8601 Points -37%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13955 Points +42%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11914 Points +21%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9813 Points
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8192 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7606 Points -22%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps +16%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps +45%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	395 fps +25%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	333.7 fps +5%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	317 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	249 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	202 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +54%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +15%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 fps +179%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	257 fps +165%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	185.4 fps +91%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps +36%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +85%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186 fps +102%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps +97%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	133.4 fps +45%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +88%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93 fps +60%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	58.1 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -31%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +66%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	89.6 fps +21%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +75%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	58.1 fps +4%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -41%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +70%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps +51%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	46.7 fps +26%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +60%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	113 fps +51%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -39%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	142 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	112 fps +13%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -49%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +88%
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps +56%
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	19.8 fps +24%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.2 fps -42%

浏览器基准测试的结果与之前的测试结果一致：Pixel 8 的性能处于良好水平，但三星Galaxy S23 和Apple iPhone 15 的性能甚至更好。

在日常冲浪过程中不会出现任何问题。网页加载速度很快。得益于 120 Hz 的显示屏，滚动也非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	259.7 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	158.595 Points +52%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	143.264 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	107 Points +3%
Average Google Tensor G3 (104.3 - 105.2, n=2)	104.7 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	104.25 Points
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	96.314 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	67.258 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	327 runs/min +140%
Average Google Tensor G3 (136 - 158, n=2)	147 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	136 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	136 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	113 runs/min -17%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)	108.3 runs/min -20%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	100 runs/min -26%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	69.9 runs/min -49%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	146 Points +55%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	136 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=161, last 2 years)	100.2 Points +7%
Average Google Tensor G3 (94 - 103, n=2)	98.5 Points +5%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	94 Points
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	93 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	78 Points -17%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	287 Points +150%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=120, last 2 years)	134.4 Points +17%
Average Google Tensor G3 (115 - 129, n=2)	122 Points +6%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	115 Points
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	98 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	87 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	68554 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	59913 Points +25%
Average Google Tensor G3 (47776 - 49506, n=2)	48641 Points +2%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	47776 Points
Google Pixel 7	45158 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	43632 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years)	33395 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	28282 Points -41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	1738.9 ms * -74%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1551 ms * -55%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	1021.8 ms * -2%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	998 ms *
Average Google Tensor G3 (840 - 998, n=2)	919 ms * +8%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)	870.7 ms * +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	701.7 ms * +30%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)	506 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

谷歌 Pixel 8 安装了 UFS 3.1 存储系统。无法通过 microSD 卡进行内存扩展。日常使用中未发现存储速度异常。我们的存储基准测试无法在Android 14 上运行 - 我们正在研究解决方案。

游戏 - 在 Pixel 8 上以最高分辨率运行的最新游戏

谷歌 Pixel 8 的性能足以应付目前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》或《Asphalt 9》。在超 HDR 和超帧率设置下，《PUBG Mobile》可流畅运行。由于 GameBench 尚不兼容 Pixel 8 或Android 14，因此目前无法测量帧率。

Asphalt 9 在 Pixel 8 上的加载时间较长。不过，一旦游戏打开，就可以顺利进行游戏。

排放--谷歌智能手机几乎没有节流功能

温度 - 张力 G3 不会太热

Pixel 8 在最大负载下会明显发热。我们测得的平均温度约为 40 度。这意味着智能手机可以始终保持在可操作状态。

在日常使用中，Pixel 8 通常会保持舒适的温度。只有在玩游戏或看电影时，设备才会明显发热，但不会让人感到不舒服。不仅正面和背面会发热，边框也会发热。

Pixel 8 在 Wild Life Stress Test 稳定性测试和 Wild Life Extreme Stress Test 极端压力测试中表现良好。智能手机的性能会受到影响，但不会像像素 7或三星Galaxy S23.

Max. Load

Idle


39.3 °C	38.8 °C	38.6 °C
40.1 °C	40.6 °C	40.2 °C
41.1 °C	42.7 °C	41.3 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 40.3 °C


39 °C	41.5 °C	41.3 °C
39.4 °C	40.9 °C	42.4 °C
39.2 °C	42.4 °C	42.8 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 41 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.6 % -18%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.5 % -21%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 %
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72.9 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.8 % -32%

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (11.3-14.4)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.6 (43.2-51.8)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)

Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)

扬声器 - Pixel 8 的立体声效果非常出色

谷歌为 Pixel 8 配备了立体声扬声器，而且效果非常好。下部扬声器向下发射，而上部扬声器则与耳罩融为一体。尤其是中频的还原非常线性，这是 Pixel 7 的又一进步。不过，低音和低频比较弱，即使对于智能手机来说也是如此。

Pixel 8 可以在不失真情况下提高音量。也几乎没有振动。虽然智能手机没有插孔输出，但我们可以顺利连接蓝牙耳机。支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 优于 Pixel 7

能源消耗 - 在最低能源消耗方面取得的进展

与前代产品相比，Pixel 7 的功耗发生了变化。像素 7.虽然 Pixel 8 在空闲模式下更省电，但在满载模式下功耗更高。不过，我们现在使用 Burnout 基准进行最大值测量，因此这些值不具有可比性。

在其他测量值中，Pixel 设备的表现接近。三星Galaxy S23 在最低消耗方面不相上下，但在所有其他方面都明显更经济。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 1.08 / 1.17 Watt
Load	8.01 / 8.89 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh	Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh	Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh	Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Average Google Tensor G3	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		7%	-15%	11%	-13%	27%	-8%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	0.56	0.89 -59%	0.9 -61%	0.76 -36%	0.62 -11%	0.57 -2%	0.595 ?(0.56 - 0.63, n=2) -6%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -60%
Idle Average *	1.08	1.07 1%	1 7%	1.1 -2%	1.78 -65%	0.74 31%	1.275 ?(1.08 - 1.47, n=2) -18%	1.453 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum *	1.17	1.2 -3%	1.1 6%	1.13 3%	1.85 -58%	0.83 29%	1.36 ?(1.17 - 1.55, n=2) -16%	1.626 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -39%
Load Average *	8.01	3.27 59%	6 25%	2.99 63%	3.02 62%	4.26 47%	8.23 ?(8.01 - 8.45, n=2) -3%	5.56 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 31%
Load Maximum *	8.89	5.5 38%	13.6 -53%	6.63 25%	8.23 7%	6.16 31%	8.76 ?(8.63 - 8.89, n=2) 1%	8.35 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 6%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.63 (0.824-8.03)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.34 (1.385-12)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.683 (0.654-0.835)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.907 (0.874-1.166)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.05 (4.07-6.98)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.99 (7.64-11.5)

Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.683 (0.654-0.835)

Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.907 (0.874-1.166)

电池续航时间 - Pixel 8 安全度过一天

我们对 Pixel 8 进行了各种电池测试。在日常 WiFi 测试中，Pixel 8 的续航时间达到了 13.5 小时，比 Pixel 7 有了显著提高，但其他对比设备的续航时间都更长。

不过，在连续循环播放视频时，Pixel 8 却大放异彩，在对比设备中遥遥领先。由于改用了 Burnout 基准，满负荷下的实际运行时间几乎没有可比性。

在日常使用中，Pixel 8 可以很好地坚持一天，如果避免长时间通话和游戏，甚至可以坚持 1.5 天。有线充电的最大功率为 30 瓦。这款智能手机还支持通过 Qi 标准进行无线充电，Pixel Stand 2 的最大功率为 18 瓦，其他 Qi 充电器的最大功率为 12 瓦。

。

通过 18 瓦的谷歌电源，Pixel 8 可以在一小时内从 0% 充电到 84%。充满电需要 87 分钟。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 53min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 25min

	Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh	Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh	Apple iPhone 15 3349 mAh	Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh
Battery Runtime		-1%	37%	55%	26%	34%
Reader / Idle	1493	1063 -29%	2698 81%	2983 100%	2272 52%	2249 51%
H.264	1363	1230 -10%	1305 -4%	1221 -10%	1235 -9%	1255 -8%
WiFi v1.3	814	731 -10%	1002 23%	1021 25%	924 14%	926 14%
Load	205	302 47%	306 49%	423 106%	304 48%	370 80%

Pros

+ 7 年更新

+ 尺寸小巧

+ 良好的图像质量

+ 明亮的 OLED 显示屏

Cons

- 滑动触觉

- 加载时间缓慢

- 新图像编辑功能只能通过云连接进行

- USB 传输速率慢

Verdic - 全面的整体软件包，可提高更新速度

与上一代产品相比，谷歌在多个方面对 Pixel 8 进行了改进。新款 Pixel 展示了坚实的创新进步，但并不代表进化的飞跃。机身变得更小，使其成为与 Pro 并驾齐驱的紧凑型设备。

普通版 Pixel 的显示屏现在可以达到 120 Hz，而且亮度极高。智能手机的摄像头也令人印象深刻，在任何光线条件下都能拍摄出精彩的照片，许多新的视频功能也令人印象深刻。归根结底，与像素 8 Pro在摄像头方面的区别就很明显了。

新的谷歌张量 G3性能良好，但还达不到配备骁龙 8 代 2.内置图形处理器也是如此。Pixel 8 的性能足以满足日常使用需求，但在同价位产品中并不占优势。

遗憾的是，谷歌没有选择最新的 UFS 4.0 存储。USB-C 端口也不尽如人意，没有图像输出，传输速率也很慢。新的人工智能图像处理功能给人留下了矛盾的印象。偶尔会有令人印象深刻的效果，但并非总是如此。此外，图像必须在云端备份，而且工作速度还有待提高。

除了纯粹的性能之外，Pixel 8 整体而言是一款成功的智能手机，其更新供应时间非常长。

谷歌新的更新承诺则值得称赞。制造商打算在七年内为 Pixel 8 系列提供更新。在此期间，还将提供备件。这可能会让 Pixel 8 成为真正的长跑运动员。如果该设备能使用如此长的时间，那么（与其前代产品相比）增加的价格也就不言而喻了。

三星三星Galaxy S23功能更强大一些，也提供了很好的更新。摩托罗拉摩托罗拉 Edge 40要便宜得多，而且还带有Android 。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

谷歌 Pixel 8 的 128 GB 版本目前在亚马逊上以 "黑色星期五 "折扣价出售，售价为 549.49 美元，有玫瑰色、曜石色或榛色可供选择。百思买（Best Buy）也对同款机型提供了相同的优惠，即 549.49 美元（玫瑰色、曜石色或榛色）。256 GB 版本的折扣价也是 609.00 美元（玫瑰色、曜石色或榛色）。

价格截至 2023 年 11 月 18 日，可能会有变动。

Google Pixel 8 - 2023-11-14 11/14/2023 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

65 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

84 / 86 → 98%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 90 → 92%

Camera

80%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 939 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel 8 智能手机评测：小巧精致，7 年更新

Benedikt Winkel, 2023-11-18 (Update: 2023-11-18)

谷歌 Pixel 8 智能手机评测：小巧精致，7 年更新

潜在的竞争对手比较

保护壳 - 带大猩猩胜利玻璃的紧凑型 Pixel 8

尺寸比较

设备 - 配备 NFC 和双卡双待功能的 Pixel 8

软件 - 谷歌承诺 7 年更新

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 Pixel 8

电话和语音质量 - Pixel 8 上清晰的通话质量

摄像头 - 普通像素 8，不带变焦镜头

配件和保修 - Google 还节省了电源装置的费用

输入设备和操作 - 没有问题的像素手指扫描仪

显示屏 - Pixel 8 的最高亮度

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 张量 G3 落后于骁龙处理器

游戏 - 在 Pixel 8 上以最高分辨率运行的最新游戏

排放--谷歌智能手机几乎没有节流功能

温度 - 张力 G3 不会太热

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

扬声器 - Pixel 8 的立体声效果非常出色

Google Pixel 8 audio analysis

Google Pixel 7 audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 优于 Pixel 7

能源消耗 - 在最低能源消耗方面取得的进展

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间 - Pixel 8 安全度过一天

Pros

Cons

Verdic - 全面的整体软件包，可提高更新速度

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare