Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 评测 - 最大智能手机的更强拍照能力和钛金属质感Apple

Name: Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Brand: Apple

不那么厚重 iPhone 15 Pro Max 首次配备了钛金属外壳和更大的电池，而且现在还使用 USB 接口。此外，它还是Apple 上第一款拥有 5 倍光学变焦的智能手机。我们对这款来自库比蒂诺的轻型旗舰手机进行了测试，您可以在这篇评测中了解到相关信息。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/03/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 今年有很多新功能：新材料、USB、动作按钮、新变焦、UWB 2、6-GHz WLAN、新的 SoC 以及在某些国家更便宜的价格。后者最让我们吃惊，不过，这可以追溯到欧洲更有利的汇率，因为美国的价格保持稳定。

反过来，Apple ，取消了 128GB 版本，使 iPhone 的入门价格与去年持平。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (iPhone 15 Series)

Processor

Apple A17 Pro 6 x 2.1 - 3.8 GHz, Coll APL1V02

Graphics adapter

Apple A17 Pro GPU

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2796 x 1290 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive, Super Retina XDR Display, OLED, Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, Ceramic Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB NVMe, 256 GB

, 238.45 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: LiDAR Scanner, Barometer, High dynamic range gyro, High-g accelerometer, Proximity sensor, digital compass, iBeacon, UWB, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66) + 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.25 x 159.9 x 76.7

Battery

17.1 Wh, 4422 mAh Lithium-Ion, MagSafe wireless charging up to 15W, Qi up to 7.5 W

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 17

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (24 mm, f/1.78, 2. Gen. sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels) + 12 MPix (13 mm, f/2.2, 120 °) + 12 MPix (5x Telephoto, 120 mm, f/2.8, D sensor‑shift optical image stabilization and autofocus, tetraprism design)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Autofocus with Focus Pixels, f/1.9) + Face ID

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C-Cable (1 m), Documentation, SIM-Tool, one Apple sticker, 12 Months Warranty, Head/Body-SAR: 0.98 W/kg, IP68; Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, NavIC; Emergency SOS via satellite, Roadside Assistance via satellite, Crash detection, BLuetooth-Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, fanless, waterproof

Weight

221 g

Price

1449 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
91.1 %	12/2023	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU	221 g	256 GB NVMe	6.70"	2796x1290
91.1 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	233 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	3080x1440
89.7 %	06/2023	Xiaomi 13 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	227 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
89.1 %	11/2022	Google Pixel 7 Pro Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	212 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440
90.1 %	07/2023	Honor Magic5 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	219 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.81"	2848x1312
89.9 %	06/2023	Sony Xperia 1 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	187 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.50"	3840x1644

外壳 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 采用钛金属外壳

iPhone 15 Pro Max 不再使用不锈钢框架，而是采用了钛金属。这应该会对其重量和稳定性产生积极的影响。前者比 14 Pro Max 减少了 19 克。14 Pro Max.反过来，这款大型Apple 智能手机的厚度也增加了一些，尽管只增加了 0.4 毫米。它的摄像头驼峰突出了 4.1 毫米，但由于采用了圆形底座，所以感觉并不笨重。

iPhone 15 Pro Max 的宽度不如前代产品。尽管只有一毫米的差别，但当你比较两者时，肯定能感受到这种变化，这是因为新机型的边缘是圆角设计。总体而言，这款智能手机虽然很大，但握持感很好。它的制造质量非常好，没有明显的缝隙，只有仔细观察才能发现任何不规则的地方。在尝试弯曲 iPhone 时，我们无法听到任何声音。

Apple 手机通过了 IP68 认证，这意味着它可以防尘防水。此外，它还符合 IEC 60529 标准，这意味着手机可以在 6 米深的水中浸泡至少 30 分钟而不会出现任何问题。iPhone 15 Pro Max 有自然色、蓝色、白色和黑色四种颜色可供选择。

尺寸比较

Sony Xperia 1 V Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Xiaomi 13 Ultra Google Pixel 7 Pro Honor Magic5 Pro Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max DIN A6 ❌

连接性 -Apple 智能手机终于配备了 USB 接口

iPhone 15 Pro Max 是第一代采用 USB-C 连接的Apple 智能手机，而不是通常的Lightning 端口。准确地说，Max 采用的是快速 USB 3.2（Gen 2）连接。我们已经对这种连接方式进行了更深入的了解 (阅读文章).

它的 USB 端口允许高达 10 Gbit/s 的标称数据传输速率，并支持 60 FPS 的超高清和 HDR 图像输出。在连接固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）的复制测试中，我们测得的平均数据传输速率为 857.28 MB/s，与ROG Phone 7 （USB 3.2 Gen. 2，859.15 MB/s）处于同一水平。不过，它比S23 Ultra 或Magic5 Pro 上的 Gen 1 连接要快得多。值得一提的是，Apple 支持所有常见的外部磁盘文件系统（FAT32、exFAT、NTFS（只读）、APFS、Mac OS Extended）。你还可以连接以太网适配器、麦克风和耳机，但不能连接 USB 鼠标或键盘。

iPhone 的操作按钮是新设计的，它取代了静音按钮。此外，它还安装了第二代超宽带芯片（UWB）、蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC。

软件 - iOS 17 具有签到和改进的待机功能

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 预装了 iOS 17 操作系统，预计至少五年内都会提供更新--Apple 没有提供这方面的具体信息。

Apple iOS 17 提供了许多新功能：其中包括通过 iMessage 签到功能，以帮助您安全回家。它允许你向一群人发送你的位置、电池和移动网络状态，还可以添加计算出的预计到达时间。如果你没有接近目标地点或延迟到达，其他用户也会收到通知。

此外，您还可以进一步个性化您的联系人，这样您就可以设置当您呼叫他人时向其显示的图像。现在可以通过 NFC 轻松自如地共享自己的联系人信息（NameDrop）。

如果你在充电时将 iPhone 放到一边，就可以使用一项名为 "待机 "的新功能，它可以显示更多信息和实时活动。此外，它的事故检测功能也得到了优化。所有更新和更多详细信息请访问Apple 网站。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 终于有了 6 GHz 无线局域网，但没有 Wi-Fi 7

在旅途中，iPhone 15 Pro Max 最多可连接到 5G-Sub6 网络，美国机型还支持毫米波。对于所有移动网络标准来说，它的频率覆盖范围都非常大，因此在世界任何地方连接互联网都不会有任何问题。不过，万一无法连接，您也可以通过卫星通信拨打紧急电话。这项服务的免费期为两年，Apple 尚未公布两年后的价格。

在无线局域网方面，Apple 终于提供了对 6-GHz 的支持--但它继续放弃了在 5-GHz 网络中使用 VHT160。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中，我们测得了稳定的传输速率，但在速度方面没有打破任何记录。此外，这款手机还不支持新的 Wi-Fi 7。

Networking
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	917 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1002 (min: 985) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1789 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1579 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼91%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼88%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	818 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1778 (min: 891) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1530 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼88%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	707 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1424 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1336 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼77%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1534 (1415-1573)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1344 (1298-1361)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (793-818)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (893-949)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)

iPhone 15 Pro Max 的双频 GNSS 支持所有全球卫星网络，包括印度 NavIC。它的定位服务运行良好，即使在室内也能快速准确地定位。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将Apple 手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。结果显示，iPhone 显示的路线与 Garmin 设备记录的路线几乎完全相同，前者只比健身智能手表短 20 米。从详细的路线记录来看，智能手机记录的路线有时确实有些不准确，但总体而言，这仍然是一个不错的结果。

电话功能和通话质量 - iPhone 支持双 eSIM 卡

当把 iPhone 15 Pro Max 放在耳边时，它的语音质量非常自然，环境噪声抑制效果也相当不错--只要声音不是太大。在这个意义上，它与前代产品前代产品.iPhone 的扬声器模式也不错，不过，使用该模式时，与你通话的人听起来会有点闷。

在大多数国家，Apple 智能手机仍然支持实体 Nano SIM 卡，而且可以连接额外的 eSIM 卡。但在美国，这款手机根本没有实体 SIM 卡插槽。双 SIM 卡操作也只适用于 eSIM 卡。双 SIM 卡功能可以在手机设置过程中进行大量配置：您必须设置一个主号码，稍后可以为每个联系人自定义主号码。对于 FaceTime，您可以选择使用两个号码。移动数据可以设置为一张 SIM 卡，但如果主 SIM 卡信号太弱，你也可以设置 iPhone 自动切换到另一张 SIM 卡。一个小问题是它不支持双应用程序。你可以通过在 App Store 上购买一些应用程序来缓解这一问题，但这些应用程序都不是免费的。其他制造商已经直接将这一功能集成到他们的系统中，例如三星,Honor和华为.

摄像头 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 可拍摄分辨率更高的照片

前置镜头仍为 1200 万像素，带自动对焦功能，根据规格表显示与去年的机型相同。使用这个镜头，你可以拍摄出令人满意的自拍照，并以高达 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清视频。

在激光雷达扫描仪的帮助下，背面的三摄像头设置继续得到扩展。主镜头可获得 4800 万像素，并使用像素分档（智能 HDR 5）。PEG Max 和ProRAW Max 可以使用手机的全部 4800 万像素。此外，该款相机继续采用传感器偏移光学防抖（OIS）技术。新增加的焦距：虽然标准设置是 24 毫米，但手机还提供 28 毫米（1.2 倍）和 35 毫米（1.5 倍）焦距。据Apple 报道，iPhone 的近乎无损的 2 倍变焦（48 毫米）仍在使用中。在实际使用中，这三个镜头在日光下都能提供良好的效果。

在弱光条件下，您仍能拍摄出一些可圈可点的照片。由于曝光时间稍长，我们的对比照片有些模糊。从三秒开始，您需要确保您的手很稳。即使没有较长的曝光时间，您仍然可以拍摄出相对较好的照片。

iPhone 的超广角模式保持不变。值得注意的是它的低分辨率和边缘颗粒感，即使在白天也是如此。不过，对于社交媒体来说，这样的表现可能还不错。相机Magic5 Pro在这方面做得更好。

iPhone 15 Pro Max 现在配备了全新的 5 倍光学变焦，这是该智能手机系列中独一无二的功能。Apple ，甚至在采用的技术方面也走了一条新路，因为它不像竞争对手那样依赖潜望式镜头，而是采用了四像素设计，这样可以节省一些空间。这也应该让传感器变得相对较大，Apple ，还为镜头配备了自动对焦功能，并首次配备了带 3D 传感器位移功能的 OIS。这让您可以拍摄流畅的视频，甚至在实际使用中，Apple ，在这方面做得非常出色。不过，数字变焦水平一般。它最多可放大 25 倍（600 毫米），但超过 10 倍后质量就会明显下降。对于更长的焦距（8 倍放大率起，192 毫米），还显示了数字取景器，我们已经从Galaxy S23 Ultra 和其他Android 智能手机上了解到了这一点。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 可录制最高 60 FPS 的超高清视频，但也可以使用 24、25、30 和 50 FPS。你可以使用最高 240 FPS 的速度拍摄慢动作视频（仅限全高清）。它还支持 HDR（杜比视界）。它的影院模式可以实现焦距偏移和虚化，最高支持超高清和 30 FPS（+ 24、25 FPS）。在视频模式下，您可以使用从超广角到 15 倍变焦的无级变焦。

不过，真正的亮点是能以 60 FPS 的速度录制 ProRes HDR 4k 视频。在全高清（60 FPS）条件下使用这种存储密集型录制格式时，我们的 256GB 机型（可用容量为 171.47GB）的存储空间在 41 分钟后就已经满了。如果我们想用超高清格式录制，iPhone 15 Pro Max 会通知我们连接外置存储设备。这样，连接的 256GB 记忆棒就可以存储 34 分钟的视频资料。Apple 只能使用 16:9 格式录制视频，这有点遗憾。21:9 等格式必须使用外部应用程序。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low-light

click to load images

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 90 D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 90 D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 90 D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 90 D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 90 D

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max: 6.57 ∆E min: 3.84 - max: 13.73 ∆E

交货和保修范围 - Care+ 稍微便宜一些

Apple Apple 在自己的商店里提供了许多可选配件，包括保护套和电源。

保修期只有 12 个月，继续提供为期两年的保险计划 Care+ ，一次性价格为 199 美元。其中包括意外损坏情况下的无限次维修、快速换货服务和优先支持。根据损坏类型，您可能需要支付额外费用。如果您花 269 美元，还可以获得失窃或遗失保障，但一年最多只能获得两次。如果您愿意，也可以按月支付这项服务的费用（9.99 美元或 13.49 美元），至少支付两年的费用，但如果您希望获得更长时间的保障，也可以延长服务期限。Apple https://www.apple.com/support/products/iphone/

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 现配备动作按钮

iPhone 15 Pro Max 配备了电容式触摸屏，在日常使用中能对输入做出可靠而快速的反应。特别是与非 Pro 机型相比，操作感觉更加流畅，这要归功于这款 iPhone 更高的 120Hz 刷新率。

3D 面部识别功能 FaceID 负责生物识别安全，它能可靠地识别用户并快速解锁手机。如果需要，你还可以保存一个戴眼镜或口罩的附加配置文件，并可以添加一个只在睁眼时解锁 iPhone 的设置。

在 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的左侧，原来的静音按钮现在被一个所谓的操作按钮所取代。它可以分配一系列功能，甚至是快捷键和辅助功能，但如果你不想没有静音键，它也可以用作经典的静音键。遗憾的是，该按键不能分配多种功能，例如，可以通过双击该按键或长时间按住该按键来识别。

手机的触觉引擎继续负责振动。这是一个电磁线性马达，可提供清晰的触觉反馈。此外，iPhone 仍然支持 AssistiveTouch、单手操作和背面轻点手势等功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 快速、明亮、自适应

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 的 6.7 英寸（17.02 厘米，110.2^平方厘米）OLED 屏幕像素密度很高，支持杜比视界。显示屏被 "动态岛 "打断，而 "动态岛 "又可以显示更多信息。

iPhone 依靠两个环境光传感器，在阳光下的亮度应该可以达到 2,000 cd/m2。目前我们还无法从显示屏上看到这样的效果--据推测，传感器必须被完全照亮。一旦我们成功做到这一点，我们将在此更新数值。即便如此，iPhone 在日常使用中启动环境光传感器时已经达到了如此高的亮度--我们在屏幕中间测得的亮度为 1,102^cd/m2。如果你想手动调节显示屏亮度，那么你可以达到 880 cd/m2 的亮度水平。在 HDR 模式下，iPhone 充满惊喜--我们在测试中实际测得的亮度并不是承诺的 1,600 cd/^m2，而是高达 2,367^cd/m2。

与前代产品一样，iPhone 15 Pro Max 也采用了超级视网膜 XDR 显示屏，自适应刷新率为 1 - 120 Hz。OLED 屏幕无法避免此类屏幕特有的闪烁现象--在最低亮度水平下，我们测得的刷新率为非常稳定的 240 Hz，尽管频率相对较低，但应该不会影响大多数人的使用。亮度超过 76% 时，频率会上升到恒定的 480 赫兹。闪烁计也证实其频率为 480 赫兹。


1095 cd/m²	1091 cd/m²	1094 cd/m²
1102 cd/m²	1102 cd/m²	1106 cd/m²
1110 cd/m²	1107 cd/m²	1111 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Super Retina XDR Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1111 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1102 cd/m² Minimum: 2.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1102 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19

	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"	Xiaomi 13 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Google Pixel 7 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Honor Magic5 Pro OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"	Sony Xperia 1 V AMOLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"	Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Screen		-28%	4%	11%	-24%	-13%	-4%
Brightness middle	1102	1117 1%	1357 23%	1022 -7%	1291 17%	934 -15%	1061 -4%
Brightness	1102	1133 3%	1340 22%	1025 -7%	1289 17%	948 -14%	1057 -4%
Brightness Distribution	98	97 -1%	89 -9%	99 1%	96 -2%	96 -2%	99 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	2.2 -100%	1.1 -0%	0.9 18%	1.7 -55%	1.5 -36%	1.3 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	3.9 -26%	2.7 13%	2.1 32%	4.4 -42%	4 -29%	3.1 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	2.3 -44%	2 -25%	1.1 31%	2.9 -81%	1.3 19%	1.6 -0%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.37 ^93%	2.2 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6555 ^99%	6572 ^99%	6366 ^102%	6650 ^98%	6472 ^100%	6384 ^102%	6511 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用照片光谱仪和分析软件 Calman 测量了显示屏的色彩准确度。在测量过程中，我们关闭了手机的真彩色调功能，该功能会使显示的内容略微偏暖。

总体而言，iPhone 的色彩范围达到了很好的水平，只有纯白色的偏差可能会被肉眼发现。其色彩饱和度也非常理想，这意味着该面板非常适合专业用途。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.88 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4485 ms rise
0.88 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4285 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.876 ms rise
1.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7045 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

iPhone 15 Pro Max 在室外使用时令人印象深刻--不仅亮度高，而且反光也不严重。

过去，iPhone 总是容易在环境温度较高时显示屏变暗。遗憾的是，我们还无法在新机型上测试这一点。

iPhone 15 Pro Max 的视角稳定性非常好，即使是在非常平的角度，也几乎不会损失任何亮度，色彩也能保持稳定。

性能 - 配备Apple A17 Pro 的 iPhone

iPhone 15 Pro Max 依赖于内部 SoC，即Apple A17 Pro配备 8GB RAM。集成处理器共有六个内核：两个性能内核的主频最高可达 3.78 GHz，效率内核的主频最高可达 2.11 GHz。

与前代 iPhone 的 A16 处理器相比，单核性能提升了 10%，但在 Geekbench 多核测试中，提升幅度并没有那么大。即便如此，与搭载Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 的竞争对手相比，它的性能还是提高了 50%。

Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | Geekbench ML | AImark

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2930 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (2900 - 2930, n=2)	2915 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2639 Points -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1985 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 1 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1774 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1465 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3443, n=147, last 2 years)	1409 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	7244 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (7200 - 7244, n=2)	7222 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	6923 Points -4%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5119 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 1 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	4255 Points -41%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3967 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 8524, n=147, last 2 years)	3932 Points -46%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Apple A17 Pro (1487075 - 1505982, n=2)	1496529 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1487075 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1407187 Points -5%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1398472 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=89, last 2 years)	1195104 Points -20%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1408 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (1402 - 1408, n=2)	1405 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1329 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1242 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1224 Points -13%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	992 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	886 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=153, last 2 years)	868 Points -38%

Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1418 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro ()	1418 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1016 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	636 Points -55%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	608 Points -57%
Average of class Smartphone (215 - 1418, n=13, last 2 years)	576 Points -59%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	319 Points -78%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2842 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro ()	2842 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2540 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	2440 Points -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	2202 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 2842, n=13, last 2 years)	1622 Points -43%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1002 Points -65%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	3638 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro ()	3638 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	3204 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	2164 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (344 - 3638, n=11, last 2 years)	1351 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	679 Points -81%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	633 Points -83%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	39328 Points +35%
Average Apple A17 Pro (29087 - 31531, n=2)	30309 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	29087 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=131, last 2 years)	23189 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1312 Points -95%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1298 Points -96%
Honor Magic5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1266 Points -96%
Sony Xperia 1 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1067 Points -96%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1008 Points -97%

集成Apple A17 Pro GPU负责图形计算，与前代产品相比，增加了一个核心，现在支持基于硬件的光线追踪。在我们的基准测试中，iPhone 15 Pro Max 的光线追踪性能提升了 50%。在 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 中，这一优势为 23%。遗憾的是，iPhone 的 GFXBench 数值有些停滞不前，有时甚至有所下降--在这项基准测试中，Android ，竞争对手的表现要好得多。

3DMark: Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	6478 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5329 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	4310 Points -33%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	6106 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5271 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	4054 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	3879 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3791 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3712 Points -4%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3595 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3196 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1807 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3829 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	3765 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3763 Points 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3687 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3365 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1847 Points -51%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	15260 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14369 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13995 Points -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13827 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	12367 Points -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6721 Points -56%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6534 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	116 fps +93%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	492 fps +11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps +10%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps +6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	455 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	444 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	301 fps -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99 fps +65%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	319 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	289 fps +10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	262 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	261 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	260 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	115 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +52%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	223 fps +24%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	206 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	190 fps +6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	187 fps +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	180 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps -40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -44%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps +16%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	125 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	110 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	98 fps -11%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88 fps -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +9%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	55 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	54 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps -7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +10%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	61 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	41 fps -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +42%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +2%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	59 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	45 fps -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	157 fps +34%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	156 fps +33%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	133 fps +14%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	117 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -36%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps +24%
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps +24%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps +20%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps +16%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	25 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	23 fps -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -44%

在网上冲浪时，iPhone 被证明是一个真正的榜样，在基准测试中完全占据了竞争优势。在日常使用中，我们并不觉得这些差异有多么极端。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A17 Pro (254 - 351, n=2)	303 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)	278.979 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	254.048 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	162.122 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	159.102 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)	143.878 Points -43%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	116.696 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years)	115.6 Points -54%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98.153 Points -61%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	445 runs/min
Average Apple A17 Pro (396 - 445, n=2)	421 runs/min -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)	371 runs/min -17%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)	168 runs/min -62%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	151 runs/min -66%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	143 runs/min -68%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	126.4 runs/min -72%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	111 runs/min -75%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	104 runs/min -77%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	304 Points
Average Apple A17 Pro (301 - 304, n=2)	303 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)	288 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 V	235 Points -23%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	211 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=84, last 2 years)	144.1 Points -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98 Points -68%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A17 Pro (86270 - 89112, n=2)	87691 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	86270 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)	72024 Points -17%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	60432 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)	60007 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	59214 Points -31%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	44245 Points -49%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	39825 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 98997, n=195, last 2 years)	35729 Points -59%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)	1643 ms * -323%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	1011.5 ms * -160%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)	981.4 ms * -153%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)	701.7 ms * -81%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	685 ms * -76%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	657.6 ms * -69%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)	469.9 ms * -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	388.3 ms *
Average Apple A17 Pro (388 - 388, n=2)	388 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - Genshin Impact，120 FPS

今年，Apple 将目光投向了游戏领域，并希望将完整的游戏机体验带到智能手机上，例如重制《生化危机 4》--或者说，它希望让游戏机变得完全多余，因为将手机和手柄连接到电视机上的妥协正在慢慢减少。

说到经典的智能手机游戏，iPhone 15 Pro Max 可提供的东西还真不少，尽管我们还不能提供任何 FPS 记录，因为GameBench还不支持 iOS 17。我们将尽快添加这些内容。

不过，我们已经可以看到，在最高细节级别下进行游戏并不会让 iPhone 出汗。恰恰相反，Apple 智能手机是首款能以 120 FPS 运行《源氏冲击 》的手机。使用高清设置和极速模式，《PUBG Mobile》也能以更高的 FPS 水平运行。

排放物 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 会变得非常热

温度

围绕 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的温度问题已经有了很多讨论，我们在测试中也已经注意到手机在闲置状态下的表面温度升高。由于 iOS 版没有《烈火战车》基准测试，我们使用了最高细节和帧率设置下的《源氏冲击》来测试其负载情况。iPhone 的表面变得非常热，但从未达到任何临界值。

今年，iPhone SoC 的散热效果不如14 Pro Max 。3DMark 压力测试清楚地表明了这一点。它的性能下降非常严重，最高达 40%。

Max. Load

Idle


38 °C	39 °C	37 °C
40.7 °C	44 °C	39.5 °C
45.8 °C	45.5 °C	42.8 °C

Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 41.4 °C


37.3 °C	39.5 °C	39.4 °C
38 °C	40.5 °C	40.9 °C
38.8 °C	43.6 °C	45.2 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 % +13%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 % +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	78.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.9 % -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	40.8 % -48%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.2 % +41%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.6 % +16%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	66.7 % +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.7 % -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46.9 % -28%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.1 % +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 %
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	62.8 % -5%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)

Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø18.3 (10.4-22.2)

Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22.4 (21.7-22.6)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)

Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø56.7 (31.6-77.5)

Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø80.2 (74.6-81.2)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)

Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.6 (37.1-83.4)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)

Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.1.2-rc1: Ø11 (7.67-17.5)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (14.1-21.3)

Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.1.2-rc1: Ø12.9 (11.8-17.3)

发言人

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 的两个扬声器都能为智能手机带来良好的音效体验。当然，它在高音量时缺少一些层次感，但在中间位置，iPhone 的声音听起来确实不错。

如果你喜欢在 iPhone 上享受高保真音频，那么你可能会在智能手机上找到合适的编解码器--不过，你无法通过蓝牙完全使用它，因为蓝牙缺少高保真编解码器。在这种情况下，你唯一的选择就是通过 USB 端口输出音频。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 4,422 毫安时，超长续航时间

耗电量

在我们的测试中，iPhone 15 Pro Max 的功耗并不高。只有在空闲模式下，它的表现才比竞争对手好得多--但这是因为它在手动模式下的亮度水平要高得多。

iPhone 并不具备指定的快速充电模式，但它的充电速度仍然很快，至少在达到 80% 之前是如此。在此之后，充电时间会更长，手机从 0 充到 100 需要将近两个小时（114 分钟）。当然，这取决于你使用的电源--我们使用了MacBook Pro 上的 67 瓦充电器。这样，手机在 25 分钟内就能充满 50%的电量，54 分钟后达到 80%。最后 10% 的充电时间最长，约为 23 分钟。在这里，电池健康比充电速度更重要。Apple ，你还可以选择一般只将手机充至 80%，以延长电池寿命。

iPhone 15 Pro Max 可以使用 MagSafe 适配器以高达 15 瓦的功率进行无线充电，在 Qi 表面上，充电功率可达 7.5 瓦。此外，还支持反向无线充电。通过 USB-C 端口连接到 iPhone 的设备充电功率可达 4.5 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.8 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	0.5 / 1.97 / 1.99 Watt
Load	3.36 / 10.43 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 4422 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Ultra 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 V 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 4323 mAh	Average Apple A17 Pro	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		4%	3%	5%	6%	-74%	7%	-2%	-23%
Idle Minimum *	0.5	0.9 -80%	0.86 -72%	0.78 -56%	0.91 -82%	1.52 -204%	0.61 -22%	0.6 ?(0.5 - 0.7, n=2) -20%	0.906 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=147, last 2 years) -81%
Idle Average *	1.97	1.05 47%	1.53 22%	1.61 18%	1.63 17%	2.16 -10%	1.7 14%	1.435 ?(0.9 - 1.97, n=2) 27%	1.441 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=147, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Maximum *	1.99	1.1 45%	1.64 18%	1.63 18%	1.67 16%	2.2 -11%	1.73 13%	1.545 ?(1.1 - 1.99, n=2) 22%	1.605 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=147, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	3.36	3.99 -19%	3.12 7%	3.29 2%	2.61 22%	7.85 -134%	3.85 -15%	4.68 ?(3.36 - 6, n=2) -39%	6.34 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=145, last 2 years) -89%
Load Maximum *	10.43	7.82 25%	6.5 38%	6.01 42%	4.57 56%	11.57 -11%	5.94 43%	10.3 ?(10.1 - 10.4, n=2) 1%	9.35 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=145, last 2 years) 10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.06 (0.718-12.5)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.709 (0.665-0.776)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.95 (5.38-11.1)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.709 (0.665-0.776)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

运行时间

iPhone Pro 15 Max 的电池容量略有增大，因此续航时间更长。在我们使用适应的显示屏亮度（150 cd/^m2）进行的现实 WLAN 测试中，S23 Ultra 的运行时间比 iPhone Pro 15 Max 更长。Galaxy S23 Ultra和小米 13 Ultra紧随Apple 智能手机之后。

我们还使用游戏 "元心冲击"进行了负载测试。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		58h 34min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 17)		19h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		33h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 24min

	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 4422 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Ultra 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	Honor Magic5 Pro 5100 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 V 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max 4323 mAh
Battery Runtime		-16%	-33%	-47%	-25%	-52%	-7%
Reader / Idle	3514	2139 -39%	1729 -51%	1210 -66%	2580 -27%	1321 -62%	3473 -1%
H.264	2013	1543 -23%	1010 -50%	1213 -40%	1249 -38%	859 -57%	1688 -16%
WiFi v1.3	1163	1100 -5%	1065 -8%	676 -42%	1074 -8%	743 -36%	948 -18%
Load	384	400 4%	298 -22%	226 -41%	276 -28%		416 8%

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 120 赫兹显示屏

+ 出色的运行时间

+ 多功能三摄像头

+ 超长更新时间

+ USB 3.2（第 2 代）

+ 宽频支持

Cons

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

- 无法通过蓝牙获得高分辨率

- SoC 性能大幅下降

- 保修期仅为 12 个月

结论 - 强劲升级

AppleiPhone 15 Pro Max 进行了重大更新。其 6.7 英寸 OLED 显示屏成为焦点，边框更纤薄，屏占比更高。它不仅亮度超高，而且色彩描绘依然准确。新的 A17 Pro 现在采用了现代的 3 纳米工艺，速度更快，Apple ，而且智能手机的大电池可实现超长的续航时间。

它的摄像头也进行了升级，这可以从照片中看出：新的 5 倍变焦性能出色，图像防抖效果也很好。此外，Apple 还出色地实现了欧盟要求的 USB-C 转换，至少在 Pro 机型上是如此。

与前代产品相比，iPhone 15 Pro Max 的手感更好，感觉也不那么厚重。它提供了一个出色的整体方案，让竞争对手望尘莫及。

遗憾的是，Apple 还不支持 Wi-Fi 7，也没有通过蓝牙提供任何高分辨率音频编解码器。此外，它还可以在通话时更好地抑制环境噪音，尤其是与三星的顶级机型直接比较时。

强有力的替代产品包括三星Galaxy S23 Ultra和小米 13 Ultra- 不过Honor Magic5 Pro或谷歌 Pixel 7 Pro也是不错的选择，这两款产品都已经开始了后继机型的研发工作。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

iPhone 15 Pro Max 可从以下网站直接购买Apple.价格从 1,199 美元起。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - 2023-10-01 10/01/2023 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

65 / 70 → 93%

Weight

88%

Battery

95%

Display

95%

Games Performance

66 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

92 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

83%

Average

85%

91%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 314 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 440893 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 评测 - 最大智能手机的更强拍照能力和钛金属质感Apple

Daniel Schmidt, 2023-10- 3 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max 评测 - 最大智能手机的更强拍照能力和钛金属质感Apple

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 采用钛金属外壳

尺寸比较

连接性 -Apple 智能手机终于配备了 USB 接口

软件 - iOS 17 具有签到和改进的待机功能

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 终于有了 6 GHz 无线局域网，但没有 Wi-Fi 7

电话功能和通话质量 - iPhone 支持双 eSIM 卡

摄像头 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 可拍摄分辨率更高的照片

交货和保修范围 - Care+ 稍微便宜一些

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 现配备动作按钮

显示屏 - 快速、明亮、自适应

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备Apple A17 Pro 的 iPhone

游戏 - Genshin Impact，120 FPS

排放物 - iPhone 15 Pro Max 会变得非常热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

电池寿命 - 4,422 毫安时，超长续航时间

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 强劲升级

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison