小米 13T Pro 评测--搭载徕卡摄像头的强大智能手机已经长大成人

高端手机无出其右者。 小米 13T Pro 不仅是一款硬件强大的高端手机，而且在软件更新方面也拉开了与竞争对手的差距。五年的更新、亮度接近 2500 尼特的 AMOLED 屏幕和高端芯片组，这些都是购买小米手机的理由。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/13/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

小米在 13T 系列的可持续发展方向上又迈进了一步--现在提供长达五年的软件支持。撇开漫长的更新保证不谈，这家中国制造商还在 13T Pro 上采取了一些新的做法。T 机型首次利用了与徕卡的合作关系，这意味着它的相机系统与前代产品有了很大不同。不同。

与小米 13 ProT 机型的芯片组。13T Pro 不仅使用了高通公司的 SoC，还使用了八核心的联发科 Dimensity 9200+这保证了真正的旗舰性能，可与骁龙 8 代 2.

价格方面，小米 13T Pro 的基础机型（配备 12GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间）的 MRSP 约为 780 美元。至于配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间的顶级版本，则需要花费约 1,000 美元。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi 13T Pro (13T Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen , AMOLED, Touch rate: 480 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 463 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.62 x 162.2 x 75.7

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1,28", Videos @4320p/24fps) + 50 MPix (f/1.9, 1/2,88", telephoto lens) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3,06", wide angle lens); camera2 API Level3:
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 78°, videos @1080p/30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, case, charger, USB cable, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 0,995 W/kg (Body, head), fanless, waterproof

Weight

206 g, Power Supply: 204 g

Price

899 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.1 %	10/2023	Xiaomi 13T Pro Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11	206 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
87.7 %	11/2022	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
90.5 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
89 %	09/2023	Sony Xperia 5 V SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	182 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2520x1080
87.4 %	08/2023	Nothing Phone (2) SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	201.2 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
89.4 %	05/2023	Motorola Edge 40 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	199 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

手机壳 - IP 等级的小米智能手机

小米 13T Pro 不仅采用了小米 13 系列的设计语言小米 13 系列、还通过了 IP68 防水防尘认证。你可以选择这款高端手机的两款高亮配色，即草甸绿和黑色，以及一款名为阿尔卑斯蓝的素皮版本。与玻璃后壳相比，合成革表面质地光滑细腻，而且不容易沾染指纹。至于素食皮革是否符合手机的高颜值要求，我们只能拭目以待，但在我们看来，黑色测试机很快就沾染了不少灰尘。

环绕 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板的是边框，虽然不是对称的，但比 12T Pro 稍微薄一些。12T Pro.这使得 2023 型号的屏占比更高，达到了 87.5%。为了降低成本，制造商继续使用更便宜的大猩猩 5 号玻璃，而不是大猩猩 Victus 玻璃（1/2）。与前代产品一样，边框仍然采用塑料材质。

我们测试样品的做工质量一流，安装的按键在边框内稳固而美观。我们没有发现任何缝隙，总的来说，没有什么可批评的。

尺寸比较

连接功能 - 配备红外爆破器的小米 13T Pro

13T Pro 在连接性方面并不出众，但即便如此，这款小米手机还是拥有一系列不错的功能，包括 NFC、蓝牙 5.4、USB OTG（包括 Miracast）和红外闪光灯。它的 USB 标准（2.0）较慢，这是它有别于高端手机的地方。高端产品的区别- 它不支持有线图像输出。在我们使用连接的 M2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的复制测试中，测试样本的 USB 端口的传输速率非常低，仅为 40 MB/s。不过，13T Pro 支持 exFAT 和 NTFS（微软系统的首选）数据系统。

我们测试样本的 UFS 4.0 存储容量为 512 GB，其中 463 GB 可供用户自由使用。内部存储无法扩展，这意味着需要大量存储空间的用户只能选择 1TB 机型。

软件 - 装有Android 13 的小米手机

小米公司计划为其高端手机提供长达四年的软件更新--安全补丁的提供时间甚至会延长一年。这意味着这家中国制造商终于与三星尽管小米还没有就每季度更新的频率发表评论。

在我们测试期间，13T Pro 的操作系统基于Android 13，最新的安全补丁是从 2023 年 9 月开始的。上面安装的是制造商自己的 MIUI，预装了大量第三方应用程序，幸好这些都可以卸载。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的小米智能手机

由于支持 WiFi 7，小米 13T Pro 实现了惊人的速度--提供了相应的对应功能。不过，我们使用参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）在 6 GHz 频率下也实现了超过 1,600 MBit/s 的高速传输速率。这些高速率在大多数情况下都很稳定。

除了快速 WLAN 之外，这款高端智能手机还支持 5G，但不支持毫米波。反过来，它的 4G 频率支持也很强大--支持各种 LTE 频段，并覆盖了所有相关频率。这款手机应该也能很好地满足出国旅行的需求。

Networking
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	672 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	824 (min: 757) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼94%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼55%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1513 (min: 1097) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	799 (min: 577) MBit/s ∼47%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	824 (min: 689) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	826 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	707 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1424 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1336 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼79%

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1826 (934-1883)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1654-1717)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (948-979)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (494-1008)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)

我们在一次自行车旅行测试中测试了 13T Pro 的定位能力--为了进行比较，我们还带上了 Garmin Venu 2。我们所走的路线在小米智能手机的记录中可能只多走了 10 米，但如果仔细观察，就会发现一些较小的误差。Garmin 手表的准确度更高，但小米手机仍然完全可以满足日常导航的需要。

小米 13T Pro 使用双频 GNSS 确定位置，支持以下所有卫星网络：GPS（L1+L5）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1+E5）、北斗（B1+B2）和 SBAS。在日常使用中，卫星定位速度快，在室内也能准确定位。

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的小米 13T Pro

小米 13T Pro 通过两个 Nano SIM 卡插槽提供全面的双 SIM 卡支持，还可将 eSIM 卡连接到系统中。此外，还支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等功能。

安装的两个麦克风都能带来愉悦的通话体验--遗憾的是会受到一些背景噪音的影响。即便如此，环境噪声抑制功能也能充分发挥作用。将手机放在耳边时，通话质量非常好，但声音可能会更大一些。

摄像头 - 小米智能手机配备 5000 万像素摄像头

与前代产品相比，13T Pro 可以使用全新的相机系统前代- 全新的摄像头系统。新的 2000 万像素自拍摄像头可能不具备自动对焦功能，但可以提供多种设置。视频仍然只能以 30 帧/秒的全高清格式录制。前置摄像头拍摄的照片有点曝光过度，但描绘清晰。

由于 13T Pro 可以利用制造商与 Leica 的合作关系，因此它还可以使用 "Leica Authentic Look "和 "Leica Vibrant Look "两种照片风格，这两种风格可以使用自然的色彩描绘或更强的对比度和强调的阴影来拍摄照片。此外，您还可以在相机设置中找到多种徕卡滤镜，包括徕卡蓝等新滤镜，这些滤镜是仿照徕卡 M240 胶片类型设计的。

手机背面的照相系统配备了一个带 OIS 的 5000 万像素主摄像头和一个包括非球面镜片的徕卡 Summicron 镜头。使用索尼 IMX707 拍摄的照片在黑暗环境中的亮度尤其出色，甚至比前代产品的 20000 万像素镜头更加清晰。即使在白天，13T Pro 拍摄的照片也非常出色。与 Pixel 7 Pro 相比，轮廓的平滑度和人为锐化的程度略有降低。像素 7 Pro或Galaxy S23- 但这也是一个优势。小米手机还能很好地捕捉细节，例如我们示例照片中的屋顶瓦片。

等效焦距为 24 毫米的主摄像头借助具有 2 倍无损变焦功能的 5000 万像素长焦镜头（50 毫米）和 1200 万像素超广角镜头（15 毫米）进行扩展。虽然长焦镜头在低变焦水平下拍摄的照片给我们留下了深刻印象，但超广角却是徕卡 Vario Summicron 镜头的弱点之一。

在视频方面，13T Pro 也得益于全新的 10 位 LOG 视频录制（UHD）和 8K 画质。HDR10+ 的 HDR 视频录制也可达到 4K 和 30 fps。此外，用户还可以选择通过 LUT 色彩分配表将自己喜欢的色彩风格导入 13T Pro。得益于 OIS 和 EIS，在视频录制过程中可以很好地捕捉运动轨迹，并可靠地稳定图像。尽管如此，我们还是希望录制的画面能更平静一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Low light Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

据制造商称，13T Pro 的照片覆盖了百分之百的 DCI-P3 大色彩范围。在可控的照明条件下，小米手机在我们的测试中表现出了不错的色彩还原能力。不过，绿色和蓝色区域的显示比参考值更亮，DeltaE 偏差也相当大。

测试图的光线很好，许多小细节都得到了保留，但外围的锐度可能会更好。

ColorChecker Xiaomi 13T Pro: 7.46 ∆E min: 2.13 - max: 12.64 ∆E

交货和保修范围 - 小米手机附带电源

在包裹中的附件越来越少的时代，我们很高兴看到 13T Pro 附带了一个 120 瓦的模块化电源、一根数据线/充电线、一个手机壳、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份简短的说明书（包括保修信息）。

在美国，当地的保修法律适用于小米手机。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的小米手机

小米手机的触摸屏速度惊人，刷新率高达 144 赫兹，采样率高达 480 赫兹，这意味着输入可以快速而精确地执行。高采样率意味着触摸屏每秒刷新高达 480 次，例如在游戏时。13T Pro 的振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，但它无法与当前旗舰产品的振动相比。旗舰机.

集成在 OLED 显示屏中的光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全。它能可靠、快速地识别手指。在白天，手机的 2D 面部识别速度也不慢，但安全性不高。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 小米 13T Pro 采用 OLED 显示屏

小米 13T Pro 依靠一个由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成的 RGGB 子像素阵列。

小米高端手机采用超快 144Hz 6-67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏。它的分辨率为 2,712 x 1,220 像素，像素密度高达 446 ppi，显示清晰。它的刷新率不像 LTPO 面板那样是动态的，而是在我们测试期间自动在三种设置（60 Hz、120 Hz 和 144 Hz）之间切换。小米还表示，它还支持其他刷新率，即 30 和 90 Hz。

据小米称，这款手机的最大亮度为 1,200 尼特，峰值可达 2,600 尼特。总体而言，我们的测试证实了这些数值。当使用激活的环境光传感器描绘全白屏幕时，我们测得的亮度非常高，达到 1,252 cd/m² - 只有小米手机的亮度达到了这个水平。OPPO Find X6 Pro和小米 13 Ultra的亮度更高。在显示明暗均匀的内容（APL18）时，13T Pro 的亮度出乎意料地略低，约为 1,192 cd/m²。不过，在播放 4K HDR 模式视频时，我们确实测得了 2489 cd/m² 的极高亮度。

由于采用的是 OLED 技术，小米使用脉宽调制（包括由此产生的屏幕闪烁）来控制显示屏。整个亮度范围内的振幅曲线非常均匀，并保持在 120 Hz。不过，制造商自己也提到了很高的 PWM 频率（2880 Hz），这种频率会让人感觉更舒适，尤其是对于敏感的人来说。


1234 cd/m²	1231 cd/m²	1214 cd/m²
1254 cd/m²	1252 cd/m²	1214 cd/m²
1240 cd/m²	1225 cd/m²	1204 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1254 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1229.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1252 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Xiaomi 13T Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"	Sony Xperia 5 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"	Nothing Phone (2) OLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 40 Pro P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		3%	-42%	-7%	7%	2%
Brightness middle	1252	913 -27%	1125 -10%	889 -29%	951 -24%	1056 -16%
Brightness	1230	913 -26%	1122 -9%	898 -27%	948 -23%	1055 -14%
Brightness Distribution	96	95 -1%	96 0%	97 1%	98 2%	92 -4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1 29%	3.2 -129%	1.4 -0%	1 29%	1.28 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	2.4 23%	4.9 -58%	4.5 -45%	2.2 29%	2.85 8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	1.8 22%	3.3 -43%	1 57%	1.6 30%	1.7 26%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	1.97 ^112%	2.23 ^99%	2.203 ^100%	2.206 ^100%
CCT	6590 ^99%	6273 ^104%	6504 ^100%	6456 ^101%	6516 ^100%	6320 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用分析软件 Calman 和光光谱仪分析了 AMOLED 面板的色彩校准。该面板通过了 Dolby Vision、HDR10+ 和 HDR Vivid 认证。色彩偏差保持在目标范围内（<3），我们测量到的 DeltaE 值非常低。

在适应性方面，MIUI 界面堪称典范，这一点我们在 13 Pro 上已经有所了解。除了三种色彩配置文件外，用户还可以在高级设置中单独调整色彩空间、饱和度和伽玛值等参数。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6085 ms rise
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.592 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.464 ms rise
0.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.48 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

从外观上看，小米手机给人留下了深刻的印象，其亮度储备足以在夏季光线充足的环境下使用。大猩猩 5 号玻璃表面的反光也几乎不会影响 AMOLED 面板的可读性。

13T Pro 的视角稳定性极佳，只有非常平的视角才会导致亮度略有下降。

性能 - 搭载联发科 SoC 的小米手机

钛白粉Dimensity 9200+小米 13T Pro 内置的 Dimensity 9200+ 集成了一个快速 ARM Cortex X3 内核（3.35 GHz）、三个 A715 内核（3 GHz）和四个 A510 内核（2 GHz），是联发科最强大的移动 SoC 之一。

在我们的基准测试中，小米手机的性能证明了它的高水平--其数值也非常稳定。在许多测试中，13T Pro 的表现都令人震惊，甚至超过了索尼 Xperia 5 V的骁龙 8 代 2.在系统基准测试中，小米智能手机低于高通骁龙 8+ 1 代的性能。

在 Geekbench 5.5 中，13T Pro 的单核 CPU 性能略高于搭载骁龙 8 代 2- 但在当前的 6.1 版本中，性能差异明显。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1549 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (1502 - 1580, n=2)	1541 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	1502 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1497 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1418 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1356 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1255 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	971 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	4998 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	4974 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4793 - 5080, n=2)	4937 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	4793 Points
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4432 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	4192 Points -13%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4045 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=174, last 2 years)	3243 Points -32%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	2006 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1984 Points +33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (1491 - 2120, n=2)	1806 Points +21%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1719 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	1491 Points
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3443, n=147, last 2 years)	1409 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	5198 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	5149 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (3787 - 5530, n=2)	4659 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4584 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 8524, n=147, last 2 years)	3932 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	3787 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	1478071 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	1478071 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1249078 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1196960 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1134684 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1086424 Points -26%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	932991 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=110, last 2 years)	791085 Points -46%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	16612 Points +22%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	15925 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	15270 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15130 Points +11%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	15067 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	13573 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	13573 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=185, last 2 years)	12698 Points -6%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1221 Points +30%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1170 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1116 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	941 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	941 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	887 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=153, last 2 years)	868 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	778 Points -17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	8893 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	8893 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	8863 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	8830 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7839 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	7466 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6423 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)	6192 Points -30%
System
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	14618 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	14401 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	13985 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	13985 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12171 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	11159 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10212 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10080 Points -28%
Memory
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	9598 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	9598 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	9266 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	8871 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8458 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6697 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	6601 Points -31%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6152 Points -36%
Graphics
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	26849 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	26849 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	26837 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	26748 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	26141 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	19110 Points -29%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	16742 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16365 Points -39%
Web
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1919 Points +8%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	1785 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	1785 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1779 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	1743 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1686 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1572 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (747 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1552 Points -13%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	68954 Points +56%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	44231 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	44231 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	16702 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=144, last 2 years)	16544 Points -63%
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192	16413 Points -63%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15782 Points -64%
Nothing Phone (2) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13807 Points -69%

撠Immortalis-G715 MP11具有极高的图形处理性能。尽管 13T Pro 在一定程度上领先于采用了骁龙 8 代 2在某些 GFXBench 计算中领先，但是Adreno 740的整体性能略高一筹。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3699 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3627 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3503 Points +16%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3011 Points
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2538 Points -16%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3857 Points +26%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3667 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3280 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3067 Points
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2786 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points -10%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13993 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13911 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11678 Points
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11075 Points -5%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6268 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6185 Points +55%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5564 Points +40%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3982 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23181 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21767 Points +13%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20452 Points +6%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19231 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14492 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13955 Points +35%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12876 Points +25%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10301 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	504 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	479 fps -5%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	476 fps -6%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps -9%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	349 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps +1%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	301 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	275 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 fps -9%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	211 fps -29%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps -3%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	205 fps +6%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	193 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	185 fps -4%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -31%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +32%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +25%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -7%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -27%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	125 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +19%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +15%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	103 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +42%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +26%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	85 fps +23%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -14%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -23%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps +5%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps +5%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -24%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +54%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +54%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +53%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -23%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	151 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +4%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	140 fps +3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	136 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps -15%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps -17%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +11%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps +4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -22%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -26%

在浏览器基准测试中，小米 13T Pro 与竞争对手相比取得了平均成绩，比 12T Pro 领先不少。12T Pro.在日常使用中，这款高端手机使用 Chrome 浏览器上网非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179.212 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	178.548 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	158.595 Points +16%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	136.736 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	136.7 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years)	115.6 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)	100.8 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	98.755 Points -28%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	179 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	176 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	176 runs/min 0%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	162 runs/min -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	136 runs/min -23%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	126.4 runs/min -28%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	72.28 runs/min -59%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112)	70.4 runs/min -60%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	171 Points +80%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	147 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	146 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 267, n=151, last 2 years)	110 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)	99 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	95 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	95 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	91 Points -4%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	231 Points +62%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	204 Points +43%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)	147 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=84, last 2 years)	144.1 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	143 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	143 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	108 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	61881 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	59913 Points +64%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	52931 Points +45%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	36482 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	36482 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 98997, n=195, last 2 years)	35729 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	33644 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)	31254 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)	1643 ms * -44%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)	1265.2 ms * -11%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	1254.7 ms * -10%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	1143.43 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ()	1143 ms * -0%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)	755.5 ms * +34%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	705.9 ms * +38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	701.7 ms * +39%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的基准测试中，这款手机的快速 UFS 4.0 存储达到了非常高的读取速率，几乎达到 4000 MB/s。不过，与前代产品相比，13T Pro 的写入速度也有所提高。前代产品.

	Xiaomi 13T Pro	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G	Samsung Galaxy S23	Sony Xperia 5 V	Nothing Phone (2)	Motorola Edge 40 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-51%	-37%	-42%	-7%	-12%	-49%
Sequential Read 256KB	3983.36	1870.78 -53%	3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0) -21% 1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1) -58%	1812.23 -55%	1949.5 -51%	3434.4 -14%	3623 ?(1851 - 4512, n=30) -9%	1815 ?(226 - 4512, n=188, last 2 years) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB	3201.74	1726.23 -46%	844 ?(UFS 4.0) -74% 628.53 ?(UFS 3.1) -80%	1331.81 -58%	1517.6 -53%	2887.4 -10%	2944 ?(1524 - 3678, n=30) -8%	1405 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=188, last 2 years) -56%
Random Read 4KB	434.21	543.38 25%	427.61 ?(UFS 4.0) -2% 343.65 ?(UFS 3.1) -21%	359.71 -17%	287.5 -34%	451.3 4%	392 ?(250 - 480, n=30) -10%	272 ?(22.2 - 543, n=188, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	583.6	483.87 -17%	156.69 ?(UFS 4.0) -73% 130.26 ?(UFS 3.1) -78%	473.91 -19%	403.8 -31%	539 -8%	474 ?(45.7 - 709, n=30) -19%	301 ?(9.4 - 730, n=188, last 2 years) -48%

游戏 - 小米 13T Pro 能达到 120 帧/秒

为了评估 Immortalis-G715 MP11 在日常使用中的图形处理能力，我们使用合作伙伴GameBench 的应用程序分析了 Play 商店中的三款游戏。.虽然显示屏支持 144 Hz 的刷新率，但我们在玩第一人称射击游戏《死亡扳机 2》时 "只 "达到了 120 fps，而理论上 HFR 游戏的最高频率应为 144 Hz。不过，根据 GFXBench 的结果，在固定刷新率为 144 Hz 的情况下，这是意料之中的。

在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，使用高清设置可以达到典型的 60 帧/秒，而使用最高细节级别（UHD）时，13T Pro 可以稳定运行在 40 帧/秒。遗憾的是，图形菜单中的 90 fps 选项不支持，因此这款高端手机即使在低细节设置下也只能保持 60 fps。

我们的第三款游戏 "Genshin Impact"也支持 60 帧/秒，但图形效果有所降低。当启用最高细节级别时，帧速率降至 30 帧/秒。

Xiaomi 13T Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø111 (90-121)

Xiaomi 13T Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps: Ø59 (37-61)

Xiaomi 13T Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø30 (25-32)

Xiaomi 13T Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.8 (58-61)

Xiaomi 13T Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.6 (47-61)

Xiaomi 13T Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放 - 小米智能手机略有节流

温度

在负载情况下，机箱发热量相当大，峰值超过 45 °C。不过，发热情况与搭载骁龙 8 代 2的智能手机相当。A 小米 13 Ultra的发热情况与搭载骁龙 8 代 2 的智能手机相当，温度超过了 48 °C。

接下来，我们借助 3DMark 压力测试检查了 Dimensity 9200+ 的热节流行为。在所有压力测试中，我们测得的数值都在 75% 以上，这证明 13T Pro 系统的性能相对稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


45 °C	45 °C	44.4 °C
45.2 °C	45.4 °C	45.3 °C
43.5 °C	43.5 °C	45.4 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 44.7 °C


41.7 °C	44 °C	42.5 °C
41.9 °C	43.5 °C	44.1 °C
39.3 °C	43.6 °C	43.7 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 42.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88.5 % +19%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.2 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.6 % -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65.7 % -11%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.2 % -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 % -30%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 % +23%
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.3 % +14%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.7 %
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.6 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.8 % -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.3 % -33%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86.3 %

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.8 (16.9-22)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.1 (15.7-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)

Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.8 (11.4-22.1)

Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6)

Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.2 (14.8-19.9)

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57 (48.3-65.1)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.7 (57.2-64.7)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)

Sony Xperia 5 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø54 (40.8-78.5)

Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4)

Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.5 (51.6-78.6)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)

Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.1 (16.8-19.4)

发言人

小米 13T Pro 上的两个杜比 Atmos 认证扬声器可提供相当均衡的音效，不过中音还可以再均匀一些。低频也相对较少，小米手机无法提供真正有深度的低音。值得注意的是，上部扬声器的层次感要比下部扬声器差很多。

如果要使用有线音频输出，必须使用手机的 USB-C 接口。现代蓝牙 5.4 支持无线连接。13T Pro 支持多种编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC V5）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 13T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 配备超级充电功能的小米手机

耗电量

小米 13T Pro 支持内部 HyperCharge 快速充电技术，功率为 120 瓦。使用升压模式为 5,000 毫安时电池完全充电大约需要 20 分钟，而直接使用默认模式则需要 29 分钟。幸运的是，这款高端手机已经配备了配套的电源适配器。

在闲置模式下，我们测得的功耗对于这种配置的智能手机来说并不明显，但在负载情况下功耗却相当高，峰值接近 16 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	0.99 / 1.14 / 1.34 Watt
Load	10.06 / 15.94 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi 13T Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (2) 4700 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Pro 4600 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200+	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	47%	21%	19%	15%	0%	8%
Idle Minimum *	0.99	1.05 -6%	0.57 42%	0.79 20%	0.9 9%	0.7 29%	0.99 ?() -0%	0.906 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=147, last 2 years) 8%
Idle Average *	1.14	1.65 -45%	0.74 35%	1.08 5%	1.1 4%	0.8 30%	1.14 ?() -0%	1.441 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=147, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Maximum *	1.34	1.72 -28%	0.83 38%	1.12 16%	1.4 -4%	1.3 3%	1.34 ?() -0%	1.605 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=147, last 2 years) -20%
Load Average *	10.06	3.12 69%	4.26 58%	7.93 21%	5 50%	10 1%	10.1 ?() -0%	6.34 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=145, last 2 years) 37%
Load Maximum *	15.94	6.02 62%	6.16 61%	8.78 45%	10.4 35%	13.7 14%	15.9 ?() -0%	9.35 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=145, last 2 years) 41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.62 (1.152-15.3)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.026 (0.956-1.234)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.79 (8.17-11.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)

Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.026 (0.956-1.234)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)

运行时间

在我们进行的实际电池测试中，13T Pro 的电池在启用 WLAN 的情况下可提供超过 18 小时的良好运行时间。这些测试是在将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的。在禁用 WLAN 模块的视频播放测试中，小米手机的续航时间约为 21.5 小时，这说明该手机的通信模块经过了优化。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 117)		18h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)		7h 07min

	Xiaomi 13T Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh	Nothing Phone (2) 4700 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Pro 4600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-2%	11%	-15%	-10%
Reader / Idle	1798	1754 -2%	2249 25%	2788 55%	1744 -3%	2102 17%
H.264	1298	1286 -1%	1255 -3%	1493 15%	1245 -4%	1062 -18%
WiFi v1.3	1099	1085 -1%	926 -16%	952 -13%	909 -17%	984 -10%
Load	427	321 -25%	370 -13%	371 -13%	268 -37%	297 -30%

Pros

+ 高品质防水表壳

+ 超长运行时间

+ 明亮的 144-Hz OLED 面板

+ 快速 SoC

+ 更新时间长

+ 包装内含 120 瓦电源

Cons

- USB 端口速度慢

- 前置摄像头没有 UHD 选项

- 定位服务稍有误差

- 没有无线充电功能

小米 13T Pro 的评价

与前代产品相比，小米 13T Pro 在许多方面都有所改进前代产品因此，它给人的感觉更成熟了。首先是徕卡相机系统，它不再使用 200 万像素的摄像头和低像素微距镜头，取而代之的是不那么以市场为导向的镜头。特别是其与徕卡共同优化的全新 50-MPix 主摄像头，在任何光线条件下都能提供出色的性能。在最佳状态下，它可以与像素 7 Pro.它的五年更新保证也是如此，这意味着小米手机终于与三星的S23 系列同等水平。

小米在 T 系列上迈出了一大步，13T Pro 是一款极具竞争力的高端智能手机。

其搭载的联发科 Dimensity 9200+在我们的基准测试中可能比搭载骁龙 8 代 2但即便如此，这款小米手机仍然表现出色。此外，在我们的实际电池测试中，13T Pro 比Galaxy S23或摩托罗拉 Edge 40 Pro.

必须做出一些妥协（类似于 12T Pro)，其前置摄像头缺少 UHD 选项，而 USB 标准速度较慢，无法输出图片。在我们的测试中，GNSS 模块的表现也不尽如人意。