Poco F5 智能手机评测--轻量级小米手机性能超越竞争对手[Redmi Note 12 Turbo]

Name: Xiaomi Poco F5
Brand: Xiaomi

又一次性价比打击？ Poco F5 是首批使用 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 的手机之一。它的其他配置也保证了良好的用户体验，包括 120-Hz 显示屏、WiFi 6E、3.5 毫米插孔和带光学防抖（OIS）功能的 6400 万像素主摄像头。值得购买吗？

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/20/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco 的 F 系列中端手机将速度放在首位，据说是在高通公司超快 SoC 的帮助下实现的。Poco F5 是首批使用Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 的智能手机之一，这意味着 Poco 手机有望达到与Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 相似的性能水平。这款小米手机在国际市场上名为Redmi Note 12 Turbo ，其 LPDDR5 和 UFS 3.1 也为中端手机提供了快速的存储连接。您可以从两个存储版本中进行选择：

Poco F5（8 GB 内存| 256 GB）| 460 美元（MRSP）

Poco F5 (12 GB RAM| 256 GB)| 492.86 美元（MRSP）。

除此之外，这款 Poco 手机还配备了 6.67 英寸 120 Hz 显示屏、6400 万像素主摄像头、1/2 英寸传感器和 OIS。它的 5,000 毫安时电池据称还可以使用专有的 67 瓦充电器快速充电。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco F5 (Poco F5 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 725

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm Jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, Brightness Sensor, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G: n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78; 4G - LTE FDD: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/66; LTE TDD: B38/40/41; 3G: B1/2/4/5/8; 2G: 850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 161.11 x 74.95

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.79, 1.4μm, OIS) + 8 MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro lens), camera2 API: level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, info material, case, MIUI for POCO, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

181 g, Power Supply: 131 g

Price

430 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.8 %	09/2023	Xiaomi Poco F5 SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725	181 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
86.4 %	09/2022	Xiaomi Poco F4 SD 870, Adreno 650	195 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
83.9 %	09/2023	Realme 11 Pro Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4	191 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
86 %	05/2023	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5	202 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
82 %	05/2023	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	175 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
86.4 %	04/2023	Xiaomi 13 Lite SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080

手机壳 - 轻便的小米智能手机

Poco F5 的机身厚度仅为 7.9 毫米，相当轻薄。但重量轻也是有代价的，因为这款手机只采用了塑料后盖，而不是质量更高的玻璃后盖。此外，超亮表面使其成为真正的指纹磁铁。它的磨砂边框也是由塑料制成。

除了我们的黑色测试样品外，Poco F5 还有白色和蓝色两种颜色。它的结构与前代产品几乎完全相同，只是屏占比略有提高，达到了 88.9%，这要归功于围绕 AMOLED 面板的更纤薄的边框。与Poco F4 类似，F5 也没有通过官方 IP 认证。Poco F5 的 SIM 卡插槽有一个橡胶密封圈，这意味着我们至少可以认为它具有一定程度的防水功能。

Poco F5 的制造质量很好，大部分缝隙都是紧密贴合、齐平的。康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃平整地安装在机壳内。

尺寸比较

连接性 - Poco F5 配备 3.5 毫米插孔

Poco F5 支持蓝牙 5.3、NFC 芯片、Miracast 和杜比视界。手机壳顶部还有一个红外线发射器，这意味着您还可以将手机用作遥控器。

这家中国制造商的中端手机只提供慢速 USB 连接（2.0 标准，480 Mbit/s），不支持有线图片输出。但支持 USB OTG、exFAT 和 NTFS。Poco F5 并不具备真正的接收通知的始终在线功能。小米手机只允许临时打开显示屏（10 分钟），让您点击屏幕查看信息，但由于采用 OLED 技术，制造商不允许永久打开屏幕。

软件 - 装有Android 13 的小米手机

Poco 将Android 操作系统与其内部用户界面 MIUI for Poco 第 14 版相结合。在测试时，Poco F5 基于Android 13，最新的安全补丁是 2023 年 8 月的。制造商没有说明这款手机将在多长时间内接受软件更新--至少，Poco F5 没有被列入小米安全中心。我们猜测，小米手机将在两年内收到Android 升级，三年内收到安全补丁。您不应该期望 Poco F5 的使用寿命超过三年，因为小米 13 Lite也没有提供长期更新。

在软件维护方面，三星已经证明了在中端领域有更多的可能性。AGalaxy A54将获得四次大更新和五年的软件更新。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的 Poco 手机

这款小米中端手机的一大亮点是支持快速 WiFi 6E。Poco F5 的集成 WLAN 模块在与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用时，可实现近 1700 MBit/s 的极快传输速率。在 5 GHz 频率范围内，其发送性能总体上稍逊一筹，因为我们在测试过程中测得了大幅下降。与Honor Magic5 Lite和支持 WiFi 5 的 Magic5 Lite 相比，Poco F5 的表现还是相当不错的。

在使用移动数据时，必须考虑到某些妥协。这款中端手机虽然可以使用 5G，但其安装的骁龙 X62 调制解调器只能覆盖 13 个 4G 频率--相比之下，其姐妹机型小米 13 Lite则支持 20 个频段。这意味着，由于频率支持有限，在旅行中使用 Poco 手机可能会比较麻烦。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	686 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	662 (min: 93) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1694 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1484 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	677 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	960 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼55%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	775 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	769 (min: 609) MBit/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼43%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	357 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼21%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1440 (min: 1312) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1757 (min: 1611) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼92%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1558-1797)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (1288-1645)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø685 (509-788)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø842 (813-856)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 725; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (93-788)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (546-831)

在定位方面，Poco F5 使用基于卫星的辅助系统 SBAS 及其主要卫星系统：GPS (L1)、Galileo (E1)、GLONASS (L1) 和北斗 (B1)，但仅限于单频段。为了评估这款中端手机定位用户的准确度，我们录制了一条与 Garmin Venu 2 平行的路线进行比较。

Poco F5 的定位服务绝非完美--我们在记录的路线上测出了相当明显的偏差--但你绝对可以用这款小米手机完成导航任务。在我们十公里路线的终点，两款设备记录的路线只相差 10 米。

电话功能和通话质量 - 配备双 SIM 卡的小米智能手机

Poco F5 可容纳两张 Nano SIM 卡，两个插槽均支持 5G、VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话。Poco F5 的通话质量整体良好，语音传输清晰。在我们的测试中，电话另一端的人也认为 Poco F5 通话质量清晰。

相机 - 配备 OIS 的 Poco F5

Poco F5 的前置摄像头为 1600 万像素，当然没有升级。前代但与前代手机相比，该镜头的感光度更低，f/2.24，传感器尺寸更小（1/3.1 英寸）--最多只能以 30 帧/秒的速度录制全高清视频。Poco F5 在日光下拍摄的自拍照效果不错，曝光均衡，清晰度也很高。人像模式可计算出具有清晰主体轮廓的虚化效果。

Poco F5 的主摄像头采用了 "老熟人"--Omnivision OV64b，这款手机的前代产品已经使用了该摄像头。6400 万像素的主摄像头（f/1.79）采用 4 比 1 的像素分档，可生成 1600 万像素的图像，还提供光学防抖功能。

6400 万像素镜头拍摄的照片在光线充足的条件下清晰度很高，但由于动态范围较低，图像中的暗部区域过多，导致一些细节丢失。在弱光条件下，Poco 手机也很快显示出了它的极限：由于它的图像传感器相对较小，只有 1/2 英寸，像素仅为 0.70 微米，因此照片有点太暗，被摄体的轮廓看起来非常模糊。喜欢更自然色彩还原的用户应确保关闭 AI 功能。

手机的超广角镜头视野相对较窄，只有 119 度，成像质量不错，但分辨率相对较低的 800 万像素镜头肯定不会让你高兴得跳起来。图像经常出现误差，对比度也有待提高，暗部往往有些颗粒感。反过来，基本锐度水平一般还算不错。由于 Poco F5 只有微距摄像头，没有长焦镜头，所有变焦图像都是完全以数字方式创建的，因此看起来并不是最好的。

在视频方面，这款中端手机（也部分得益于 OIS）显示出良好的防抖效果。动态图像可以录制成 UHD 画质，如果需要，还可以录制成 60 fps 的 1080p 画质。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Ultra-wide angle Low-light Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控照明条件下，我们分析了 6400 万像素镜头的色彩描绘与真实参考色的对比。除了智能手机常见的变亮现象外，Poco 手机（包括 AI 功能）在 ColorChecker 通行证中显示的绿色和蓝色色调偏差较大。

Pur 测试图的描绘非常清晰，只是在边缘处有些模糊。

交货和保修范围 - Poco 手机包括一个电源供应器

Poco F5 的供货范围包括一个 67 瓦模块化电源、一条数据线/充电线、一个保护套、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份简短的说明书（包括保修信息）。此外，手机还预装了屏幕保护膜。

小米为这款手机提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的小米智能手机

Poco F5 配备的主动式指纹传感器位于电源按钮内。它能可靠、准确地解锁这款中端手机。手机屏幕完全点亮确实需要很短的时间。手机还具有相对不安全的 2D 面部识别功能，该功能基于 FaceUnlock（面部解锁）功能，依赖于前置摄像头。

由于刷新率为 240 Hz，安装的 AMOLED 点阵面板对触摸输入反应灵敏，每秒刷新多达 240 次（例如在玩游戏时），因此输入后的延迟时间很短。输入可在 6.67 英寸显示屏上准确实现。

显示屏 - 配备 OLED 显示屏的 Poco F5

该设备的 6.67 英寸 OLED 显示屏分辨率为 2,400 x 1,080 像素，最大刷新率为 120 Hz。它的刷新率不是自适应的，但如果用户要求，系统可以将其动态调整为 60 或 120 Hz。HDR 标准 HLG、HDR10 以及 HDR10+ 和杜比视界都得到了支持。我们测量的亮度接近制造商规定的 1,000 尼特，这意味着 HDR 内容在 Poco F5 的屏幕上能发挥最大优势。

在显示纯白色表面时，屏幕的最大亮度可达 1,078 cd/m²。在 APL18 测试中，当我们在屏幕上添加一些较暗的区域时，亮度水平保持惊人的相似（1,016 cd/m²）。相比之下三星Galaxy A54 5G在 APL18 测试中达到了 1,390 cd/m² 的峰值亮度水平。


1005 cd/m²	1027 cd/m²	1060 cd/m²
1009 cd/m²	1034 cd/m²	1078 cd/m²
1002 cd/m²	1023 cd/m²	1059 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1078 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1033 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1034 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Poco F5 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Xiaomi Poco F4 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Realme 11 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Xiaomi 13 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen		-16%	-7%	-1%	9%	11%
Brightness middle	1034	917 -11%	772 -25%	940 -9%	846 -18%	905 -12%
Brightness	1033	923 -11%	764 -26%	935 -9%	853 -17%	904 -12%
Brightness Distribution	93	96 3%	97 4%	99 6%	88 -5%	99 6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	2 -5%	1.72 9%	2.4 -26%	1.3 32%	1 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.7	5.2 -41%	3.83 -4%	3.2 14%	2.7 27%	3 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	3.5 -30%	2.7 -0%	2.2 19%	1.7 37%	2.2 19%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.252 ^98%	2.05 ^107%	2.19 ^100%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6917 ^94%	6447 ^101%	6621 ^98%	6422 ^101%	6570 ^99%	6382 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

与所有 OLED 显示屏一样，Poco F5 的屏幕也会在整个亮度范围内闪烁。在测量过程中，我们注意到它的频率一直保持在 120 Hz，由于振幅曲线比较平缓，乍听起来很低，但仍能让人觉得很舒服。

制造商声称这款手机可以实现极高的 PWM 调光（1,920 Hz），这样会让人感觉更舒适，尤其是对于更敏感的用户。我们无法确定造成这种差异的原因是我们的测量设备，还是在测试时自动调光功能没有激活。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

这家中国制造商的中端手机总共有三种色彩配置文件，并提供扩展设置，让您可以选择色彩空间、色温以及设置包括色彩饱和度在内的单个参数。

我们使用分析软件 Calman 和光度计对 AMOLED 面板的色彩校准进行了分析。使用生动的配置文件，P3 色彩空间（与 sRGB 相比更大）得到了控制，几乎完全覆盖。我们在测量中只发现了很小的色彩偏差，测得的 Delta E 值也表明灰度偏差很小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.612 ms rise
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6405 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8715 ms rise
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.913 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Poco F5 的户外可读性非常好，即使阳光直射也不会对 AMOLED 显示屏造成影响。只有屏幕上的一些反光可能会有点恼人。环境光线传感器能对新的光线环境做出快速反应。

屏幕的视角稳定性非常好。即使在平面角度下，显示屏的亮度也不会变低，颜色也只会变冷一点点。

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Poco F5

高通公司承诺通过其骁龙 7+ 第二代相比前代手机.这款 4 纳米芯片组结合了一个 Cortex X2 性能内核（2.91 GHz）、三个 Cortex A710 内核（2.49 GHz）和四个节俭的 Cortex A510 效率内核（1.8 GHz）。

在我们的 CPU 基准测试包中，Poco F5 的表现大大优于小米 13 Lite要好得多。骁龙 7 代 1.骁龙 7+ Gen 2 在 Geekbench 的多核性能测试中表现尤为突出。这意味着 Poco F5 的成绩与高通骁龙 8+ 1 代内的无手机 2.在人工智能和系统基准测试中，Poco F5 与其中端竞争对手之间没有巨大差异。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	1225 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (1224 - 1225, n=2)	1225 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	963 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points -26%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	835 Points -32%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	791 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	783 Points -36%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	666 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (3948 - 3970, n=2)	3959 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	3948 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	3007 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points -24%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	2894 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	2817 Points -29%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2335 Points -41%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1891 Points -52%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	1687 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	1687 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points -18%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	947 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	4378 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	4378 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points -12%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2407 Points -45%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	1115567 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (1009127 - 1115567, n=2)	1062347 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	662980 Points -41%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	581838 Points -48%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	530929 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	507481 Points -55%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	14480 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	14143 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	14143 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	13024 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	12866 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	11890 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points -17%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10071 Points -29%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	817 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	817 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	734 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	703 Points -14%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	662 Points -19%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	597 Points -27%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	575 Points -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	5616 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	5089 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	5089 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4666 Points -8%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4539 Points -11%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4097 Points -19%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +30%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	9315 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	8962 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	8961 Points +20%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	8797 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	7446 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	7446 Points 0%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	6506 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +43%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4939 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4857 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4385 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	4374 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	4374 Points 0%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	15847 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	15847 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	12630 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	7612 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	7108 Points -55%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4655 Points -71%
Web
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	1533 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +8%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	1445 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	1384 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	1384 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	1315 Points -5%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	1315 Points -5%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	29413 Points +180%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	23122 Points +120%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +108%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144	18000 Points +71%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	10511 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	10511 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	5835 Points -44%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	44527 Points +3645%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +1400%
Realme 11 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	9646 Points +711%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192	1189 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	1189 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	622 Points -48%

在图形测试中，所安装的骁龙 SoC 的Adreno 725必须显示出它的价值。在 GFXBench 测试（以及 3DMark 测量）中，Poco F5 的表现比Poco F4高出 50%。Adreno 650。特别是在 GFXBench 测试中，Adreno 730 的性能提升了Adreno 730与 Adreno 725 相比，性能提升幅度相当低。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1968 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1218 Points -38%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	799 Points -59%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	622 Points -68%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points -82%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1984 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1207 Points -39%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	813 Points -59%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	636 Points -68%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points -82%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7701 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points -45%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3035 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2853 Points -63%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2254 Points -71%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points -84%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7684 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4262 Points -45%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3095 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2826 Points -63%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2298 Points -70%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1209 Points -84%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	113 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -49%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	359 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	182 fps -49%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	147 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	119 fps -67%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	76 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps -42%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	232 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps -59%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	80 fps -66%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -71%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -49%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -59%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -65%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	137 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -44%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -62%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -66%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -38%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -62%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -66%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -38%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -61%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -37%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -59%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps -65%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -76%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -35%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -62%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11 fps -68%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps -76%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -38%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -63%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -68%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +69%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -3%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -14%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -37%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10 fps -37%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -63%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4.8 fps -70%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps -77%

在浏览器速度方面，小米手机也没有表现出任何弱点。网站加载速度很快，而且可以流畅地滚动浏览。在基准测试中，Poco F5 的表现并不尽如人意，但即使在基准测试中，Poco F5 也能名列前茅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	126.4 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	126.392 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	96.94 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	94.611 Points -25%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	90.021 Points -29%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	74.161 Points -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	108 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	108 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min -1%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	77.5 runs/min -28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	70.5 runs/min -35%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	67.2 runs/min -38%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	54.4 runs/min -50%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	107 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	107 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	97 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	79 Points -26%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	66 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Chrome 103)	46 Points -57%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	134 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	124 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	114 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)	104 Points -22%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	81 Points -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	37823 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	37823 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 (Edge 105)	34767 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	33801 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points -12%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	31813 Points -16%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	27804 Points -26%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112)	22847 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco F4 (chrome 103)	1792.1 ms * -75%
Realme 11 Pro (Chrome 115)	1656.2 ms * -62%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -56%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	1384.1 ms * -36%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	1208.8 ms * -18%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)	1021.2 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 ()	1021 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面，Poco F5 的 UFS 存储提供了出色的性能。特别是在写入和读取小数据块时，AndroBench 测试的分数令人印象深刻，是 Poco F4 的两倍。 Poco F4.

	Xiaomi Poco F5	Xiaomi Poco F4	Realme 11 Pro	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G	Xiaomi 13 Lite	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-49%	-31%	-69%	-69%	-41%	-26%	-34%
Sequential Read 256KB	1798.37	1371.56 -24%	1818 1%	528.32 -71%	486.17 -73%	1001.82 -44%	1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88) -2%	1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years) -16%
Sequential Write 256KB	1736.41	701.06 -60%	1233.6 -29%	335.39 -81%	420.44 -76%	871.96 -50%	1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88) -35%	1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years) -36%
Random Read 4KB	389.37	183.61 -53%	233.6 -40%	236.23 -39%	171.13 -56%	277.33 -29%	282 ?(173.5 - 543, n=88) -28%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	498.93	200.41 -60%	226.6 -55%	70.52 -86%	149.12 -70%	301.41 -40%	309 ?(132.1 - 499, n=89) -38%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years) -46%

游戏 - 小米智能手机无法达到 100 帧/秒

在 GPU 基准测试之后，安装的Adreno 725(及其 8GB RAM）必须显示您是否能在 Poco F5 上玩任何要求苛刻的游戏，以及它是否适合 HFR 游戏。我们使用GameBench 应用程序的应用程序来测量帧率。

当以高细节设置（UHD）运行《PUBG Mobile 》时，我们注意到帧率始终保持在 40 帧/秒。如果我们将其降至高清，高通图形处理器甚至能达到每秒 60 帧。即使切换到低图形细节的 90 帧/秒设置，帧率也丝毫没有提高。要求稍低的游戏，如《Armajet》，也无法完全利用 OLED 面板的 120 Hz 频率。稍等片刻，帧率就会降到 60 帧以下。

作为本次测试的第三款也是最后一款游戏，我们测试了对图形要求较高的奇幻动作角色扮演游戏《玄心冲击》。在高细节设置下，我们测得的帧数为 30 fps，而在降低图形性能的情况下，Poco F5 甚至能达到 60 fps。

Xiaomi Poco F5; Armajet: Ø53.7 (40-87)

Xiaomi Poco F5; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø55.9 (31-60)

Xiaomi Poco F5; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø32.1 (29-33)

Xiaomi Poco F5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.8 (58-60)

Xiaomi Poco F5; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (38-60)

Xiaomi Poco F5; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (33-41)

排放 - Poco F5 的充电速度相当快

温度

在空闲模式下，Poco F5 的表面温度并不明显，但在长期负载情况下，我们测得的温度峰值接近 46 °C。不过，这也要归功于要求非常苛刻的 Burnout 基准测试。AGalaxy A54因此，我们无法将 Poco F5 的温度值与旧版测试值进行精确比较。

在 3DMark 的 Wild Life Stress 测试中，我们检查了手机内部的热量是否能够充分散发，机壳的散热是否足够。在最大节流 15% 的情况下，尽管性能略有下降，但小米手机的表现相对稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


44.8 °C	44.5 °C	42.6 °C
44.8 °C	44.6 °C	44 °C
44.2 °C	44 °C	44 °C

Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 44.2 °C


39.8 °C	42.3 °C	45.9 °C
38.6 °C	41.3 °C	45.8 °C
37.1 °C	43.1 °C	43.7 °C

Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 42 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 % +16%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % +16%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % +16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % +15%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91.5 % +7%
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85.8 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 %
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.8 % -12%

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.7 (11.7-11.8)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.11 (6-6.84)

Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.81 (3.8-3.82)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.17)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.99 (4.97-5)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.9 (39.1-45.6)

Xiaomi Poco F4 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.9 (21.2-23.2)

Realme 11 Pro Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.8 (13.7-13.8)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.21)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.5-18.6)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (39.7-46.1)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)

发言人

Poco F5 依靠双扬声器系统，除了立体声感觉外，还能提供足够大的音量--我们测得的最大音量为 91 分贝。不过，中频手机无法提供真正有深度的低音，但高音却能线性地再现。我们的测量还显示，中音的频率响应稳健，呈上升趋势。

如果您想使用有线音频输出，可以使用 3.5 毫米插孔。噪音水平在良好范围内，信噪比约为 80 dBFS。可使用现代蓝牙 5.3 进行无线连接。Poco 手机使用多种支持的编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC V5）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco F5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 电池续航时间更长的小米手机

耗电量

虽然 Poco F5 比上一代产品更轻轻了电池容量增加了 500 毫安时。该手机的 5,000 毫安时电池可通过电缆以最大 67 瓦特的功率充电，从零开始充满电大约需要 48 分钟。值得庆幸的是，该设备的供货范围中包含了一个足够快的充电器。不支持无线充电和反向无线充电。

Poco F5 的闲置功耗非常低，约为 1 瓦。骁龙骁龙 7+ 2 代在负载情况下的功耗要高出不少，但即便如此，在与竞争对手进行比较时，也必须考虑到 Burnout 基准。HTC U23 ProHTC U23 Pro配备了骁龙 7 代 1在我们的新测量设置中，峰值功耗也达到了 11 瓦，但 Poco F5 在负载情况下的功耗似乎仍然很高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.15 Watt
Idle	0.89 / 1.05 / 1.08 Watt
Load	10.86 / 13.49 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Poco F5 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F4 4500 mAh	Realme 11 Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		15%	10%	2%	7%	0%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	0.89	0.8 10%	0.9 -1%	0.75 16%	0.74 17%	0.89 ?() -0%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Average *	1.05	1.29 -23%	1.3 -24%	1.51 -44%	1.56 -49%	1.05 ?() -0%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Maximum *	1.08	1.38 -28%	1.7 -57%	1.62 -50%	1.59 -47%	1.08 ?() -0%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -51%
Load Average *	10.86	3.78 65%	3.5 68%	4.91 55%	3.33 69%	10.9 ?() -0%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 49%
Load Maximum *	13.49	6.71 50%	5 63%	8.93 34%	7.59 44%	13.5 ?() -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 38%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.57 (0.819-10.1)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.68 (0.899-12.4)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.917 (0.854-1.267)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.86-6.72)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.19 (3.78-5.87)

Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.917 (0.854-1.267)

运行时间

在我们的实际电池测试中，显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，因此具有很好的可比性，在固定的 120 Hz 刷新率下，Poco F5 提供了强劲的续航时间。

在 WLAN 测试中，这款中端手机的续航时间约为 17 小时，而在禁用 WLAN 模块的情况下，无休止地播放视频时，续航时间甚至可以多出两个小时。与其前代产品相比，运行时间增加了 25%。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 04min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 116)		16h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 43min

	Xiaomi Poco F5 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F4 4500 mAh	Realme 11 Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G 5100 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-20%	22%	27%	-20%	13%
Reader / Idle	1324	1342 1%	2594 96%	2591 96%		2240 69%
H.264	1123	929 -17%	1226 9%	1508 34%		1185 6%
WiFi v1.3	1014	665 -34%	799 -21%	941 -7%	816 -20%	822 -19%
Load	343	246 -28%	355 3%	284 -17%		321 -6%

Pros

+ 性能卓越，价格低于 500 美元

+ 明亮的 120-Hz OLED 面板

+ 运行时间长

+ 功能强大（3.5 毫米插孔、OIS 等）

Cons

- 无更新保证

- 触觉缺陷（塑料边框和背面）

- 无官方 IP 等级

小米 Poco F5 的评价

Poco F5 评测。测试设备由 cyberport.de 提供 — Poco F5 评测。测试设备由提供：

说到 500 美元以下的手机，Poco F5 是一个非常有趣的选择。得益于其骁龙 7+ 第二代处理器与同价位的中端手机相比，这款手机的性能要好得多，例如三星Galaxy A54 5G或Honor Magic5 Lite.

除了功能强大的高通 SoC 之外，小米手机还以其丰富的功能（WiFi 6E、3.5 毫米插孔、胖充电......）、明亮的 120-Hz AMOLED 面板（高色彩空间覆盖率）以及超长的续航时间给人留下了深刻印象。此外，在这个价格范围内，几乎没有其他手机能像 Poco F5 一样提供如此广泛的交付范围。说到相机组合，Poco F5 在日光下的表现不错，但也仅此而已。主摄像头可以使用 OIS，但拍照绝不是小米手机的强项之一。

小米 Poco F5 在纤薄轻巧的机身中融合了良好的性能和强大的硬件。

这款手机不确定的更新交付略微影响了其整体表现。在这方面，三星的 A 系列更有前途，因为它有五年的更新保证。Google Pixel 7a 同样具有 IP67 认证、无线充电和更好的摄像头，售价约为 450 美元。

价格和供应情况

测试期间，Poco F5 在亚马逊的售价为 391.50 美元起。

Xiaomi Poco F5 - 2023-09-18 09/18/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Weight

90%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

67 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

85 / 86 → 99%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

65%

Average

80%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 215 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390604 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Poco F5 智能手机评测--轻量级小米手机性能超越竞争对手[Redmi Note 12 Turbo]

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-09-20 (Update: 2023-09-20)

Poco F5 智能手机评测--轻量级小米手机性能超越竞争对手[Redmi Note 12 Turbo]

潜在的竞争对手比较

手机壳 - 轻便的小米智能手机

尺寸比较

连接性 - Poco F5 配备 3.5 毫米插孔

软件 - 装有Android 13 的小米手机

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的 Poco 手机

电话功能和通话质量 - 配备双 SIM 卡的小米智能手机

相机 - 配备 OIS 的 Poco F5

交货和保修范围 - Poco 手机包括一个电源供应器

输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的小米智能手机

显示屏 - 配备 OLED 显示屏的 Poco F5

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 Poco F5

游戏 - 小米智能手机无法达到 100 帧/秒

排放 - Poco F5 的充电速度相当快

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Poco F5 audio analysis

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 电池续航时间更长的小米手机

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

小米 Poco F5 的评价

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare