三星Galaxy S23评论。小巧的S23智能手机实现了最大的飞跃
Galaxy S系列中最小的智能手机不仅具有最小的物理尺寸,而且近年来总是比Plus型号稍弱。今年,两个变体之间的唯一区别是UWB芯片,而S23缺乏该芯片。
除此之外,Galaxy 智能手机在外观上与前代产品几乎没有变化,即S22,而且只略有增长,但被赋予了一个更大的电池。继续阅读,在此了解改进的显示屏、新的 骁龙8代2的Galaxy和更大的电池是否证明是成功的。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.5 % | 03/2023 | Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 167 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 | |
89.1 % | 02/2023 | Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.36" | 2400x1080 | |
90.3 % | 01/2023 | Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16, A16 GPU 5-Core | 206 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.10" | 2556x1179 | |
89.1 % | 02/2023 | Vivo X90 Pro Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 214.9 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2800x1260 | |
88.5 % | 11/2022 | Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" | 2400x1080 | |
88.6 % | 09/2022 | Asus Zenfone 9 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 169 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 5.90" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 紧凑而舒适
三星Galaxy S23总共有六种颜色,其中奶油色、幻影黑、绿色和薰衣草色在商店广泛销售,石墨色和青柠色则通过三星商店独家销售。
这款智能手机又可以明确无误地识别为Galaxy 智能手机。然而,三星将摄像头的设计与Ultra机型的设计保持一致。这款手机从外壳上突出了2.3毫米,因此,智能手机在平坦的表面上时,会有轻微的晃动。
制造质量很好。缝隙很紧,非常均匀。S23很容易经受住扭转的压力,但会有轻微的吱吱声。框架由抛光的Armor铝制成,正面和背面的玻璃是康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus 2。它的手感很好,有一种高质量的感觉,但尽管有磨砂的背面,却相当容易沾染指纹。
Galaxy S23又是根据IP68认证,既防尘又防水。
设备 -Galaxy S23,不含UWB
今年,三星Galaxy S23再次利用了USB 3.2(Gen. 1),支持有线图像输出和OTG。后者允许外围设备和外部存储媒体连接到智能手机上。该接口能够实现高数据传输率,在我们的复制测试中实现了252MB/s的传输率。
有128或256GB的存储空间可供选择。我们推荐较大的型号:因为没有microSD插槽,这一方面提供了更大的容量,另一方面,较小的存储变量,即我们的测试设备,仍然有较慢的UFS 3.1存储。三星通知我们,UFS 4.0(到目前为止)不在这种小单元中生产。
S23也没有超宽带芯片(UWB),所以不可能使用三星智能手机的数字键。此外,既没有集成红外发射器、无线电接收器,也没有音频插孔。
软件--三星DeX和漫长的更新周期
三星Galaxy S23配备了谷歌Android 13,在审查时是最新的,并配备了内部的One UI 5.1。与Galaxy S系列的所有智能手机一样,S23也会收到四个系统升级和额外一年的安全补丁。后者每月都会发布,但这种情况是否会持续到最后一年还不完全清楚。话说回来, Galaxy S20仍然每月收到安全补丁,所以这在未来几年不太可能改变。
除了谷歌的应用,三星自己的应用也可以在S23上使用,以及Galaxy App Store。Facebook、Netflix、Spotify和各种微软应用也预装在三星智能手机上。除了OneDrive之外,所有第三方应用都可以完全卸载,而上述应用只能停用。
桌面模式DeX也被支持,既可以通过无线方式使用,也可以通过一个可选的电缆使用。后者的变体工作起来更顺畅。
通信和GNSS - 快速的WLAN和精确的定位
三星Galaxy S23为所有移动通信标准提供了广泛的频率范围,与更昂贵的机型相比,在这方面没有任何妥协。大都市地区的接收值主观上非常好,没有给人以批评的理由。
虽然Galaxy 智能手机不支持Wi-Fi 7,但在我们与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,它在5.0和6.0 GHz网络中都取得了非常高和稳定的传输率。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Xiaomi 13 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Vivo X90 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Google Pixel 7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
使用三星Galaxy S23进行定位,无论是在户外还是在室内都非常迅速和准确。
为了能够更准确地评估智能手机的定位能力,我们带着它进行了一次短途骑行,在这期间,我们将它与佳明Venu 2。在一条不到10公里的路线上,两台设备的距离只有30米。在对路线的详细总结中,两者的表现都不是很好,显示出一些不准确的地方;Garmin手表总是更准确一点。尽管如此,S23为日常导航任务提供了良好的装备。
电话和语音质量
三星Galaxy S23的电话功能在测试中表现良好。当拿在耳边时,语音质量处于非常好的水平,对于接收者来说,来自大群人的嘈杂背景噪音完全被消除了。扬声器也能带来体面的对话体验,即使用户离S23有两米远,也能正常理解。
支持VoLTE和WiFi通话等功能,但系统中没有实现SIP账户支持。Galaxy 智能手机有两个nano-SIM卡插槽,但也可以使用eSIM卡而不是实体SIM卡。
照相机 -Galaxy S23中的良好的三合一相机
Galaxy S23的前置摄像头已被完全重新设计,现在整个S23系列都是一样的。光学系统再次依靠自动对焦,提供了很多设置和过滤器的选项,并能以每秒60帧的速度录制超高清视频。其结果令人印象深刻。
主摄像头的核心是一个5000万像素的传感器,使用像素分选来生成12.5万像素的图像。图片也可以以全分辨率拍摄。在白天,照片很好,有很高的细节水平,但显得有些过度锐化。当有背光时,对比度也会受到一些影响。照片格式为4:3、16:9、全屏(19.5:9)和1:1。
超广角使用了与S23 Ultra相同的传感器, ,这比去年的机型有明显的改进。然而,景深可以更明显一些,外围区域的锐度明显下降。
第三个镜头是一个三倍光学放大镜,它和主传感器一样,可以利用光学图像稳定(OIS)。白天的照片很好,但分辨率可以再高一点。如果你想更接近拍摄对象,你可以使用30倍数码变焦。最大的放大倍数其实并不适合拍照,但高达10倍的变焦对社交媒体来说是足够的。在低光照情况下,照片会变得非常嘈杂,很少好看。与其他S23机型一样,S23也有专家RAW应用和专业模式。
在最好的情况下,视频以8k记录,最高30FPS,而超高清(最高60FPS)和全高清(最高120FPS)与HDR10+也可用。一些设置可以通过专业模式手动调整,也可以使用21:9的长宽比。
变焦水平(从左):广角(1x),3x,10x,30x
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light在受控的照明条件下,三星Galaxy S23显示出体面的色彩再现。然而,在含有绿色和蓝色元素的颜色中,DeltaE的偏差相当高,而且比它们应该的要亮得多。
测试图的拍摄效果很好,许多小细节都被保留了下来,但并非所有区域的锐度都是最佳的。这种现象更多地发生在孤立的点上,但也不是特别明显。
配件和保修 - 只包括基本的东西
三星Galaxy S23采用非常平坦的盒子包装,这表明除了智能手机之外,几乎没有什么东西包括在内。毕竟,三星在这里使用了完全回收的纸张。打开后,里面只有一条USB-C电缆、一个SIM卡工具和几张薄薄的信息单。电源适配器需要选择购买,在三星商店的建议零售价约为35美元。
S23在德国有24个月的保修期,这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。
这可以通过Care+保险包来扩展,可以购买一年或两年的保险,还包括额外的盗窃保险。这个保险包的范围也可能因国家而异。例如,在美国,买家可以选择10美元/月(最长36个月),可以随时取消,或者选择189美元的2年计划(在纽约不提供)。当你提出索赔时,可能需要支付99-199美元的免赔额或29-99美元的服务费,而且在12个月内最多可以提出三次保险索赔。
输入设备和操作 - 240赫兹的触摸屏
Galaxy S23的电容式触摸屏的表面具有良好的滑行性能,并以240赫兹的采样率工作。输入的信息被很好地识别,并迅速而准确地执行。
生物识别安全由集成在显示屏上的超声波指纹传感器提供,其作用非常迅速和可靠。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头使用不太安全的面部识别解锁。
电源键被用作功能键,启动内部语言助手Bixby ex works。这也可以在设置中切换回作为经典电源键的功能。此外,相机或任何其他应用程序可以通过按两次电源键来启动。在这方面,S23丝毫不逊于其较大的兄弟姐妹们。
显示 -Galaxy S23的更多亮度
三星Galaxy S23使用6.1英寸(15.49厘米)的AMOLED显示屏,分辨率为2,340 x 1,080(全高清+),因此显示效果清晰。如果你想省电,你可以把分辨率降低到HD+。LTPO面板的刷新率在48和120赫兹之间动态调整;将其固定在60赫兹也是可以选择的。包括的HDR标准有HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,但不包括Dolby Vision。
不像去年的前辈Galaxy S23,与更昂贵的型号相比,不再需要满足于降低的最大亮度。在激活环境光传感器的情况下,在纯白的显示屏上可以达到1122cd/m²的高亮度。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL18),在测试中这甚至增加到1653 cd/m²。如果你喜欢手动调节亮度,你有高达431 cd/m²的亮度可供选择。通过额外的亮度选项,这可以提高到730cd/m²。最低显示亮度的情况与此类似,在正常情况下,最低亮度为1.24cd/m²,相对较低。如果你打开输入帮助中的额外调光功能,你可以将亮度降低到0.9cd/m²。
像所有的OLED一样,S23的OLED也会闪动。这在最低亮度时以非常稳定的120赫兹发生。亮度增加了一点(>3%),成为一个恒定的240赫兹,周期曲线非常均匀。这表明永久的直流调光,对眼睛来说应该是容易的。没有检测到时间上的抖动。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1125 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.97
Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10 | Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36 | Apple iPhone 14 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10 | Vivo X90 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78 | Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30 | Asus Zenfone 9 AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.90 | Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 26% | 23% | 25% | 21% | 7% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 1125 | 1209 7% | 1046 -7% | 1018 -10% | 936 -17% | 793 -30% | 853 -24% |
Brightness | 1122 | 1208 8% | 1049 -7% | 1026 -9% | 947 -16% | 796 -29% | 858 -24% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 98 2% | 93 -3% | 95 -1% | 97 1% | 96 0% |
Black Level * | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.2 62% | 1.2 62% | 0.9 72% | 1.3 59% | 1.9 41% | 1.9 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.9 | 3 39% | 3.1 37% | 2.2 55% | 2.7 45% | 3.4 31% | 3.2 35% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.1 36% | 1.7 48% | 1.9 42% | 1.4 58% | 2.3 30% | 1.9 42% |
Gamma | 1.97 112% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 6504 100% | 6504 100% | 6538 99% | 6473 100% | 6664 98% | 6860 95% | 6460 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9365 ms rise | |
↘ 0.836 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6965 ms rise | |
↘ 0.663 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
在户外,三星Galaxy S23给人留下了非常好的印象,在所有照明条件下都有足够的亮度能力。反射是存在的,但不是太明显。
Galaxy S23中的AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。在非常平坦的视角下,亮度会有所下降,显示屏会变得更冷。然而,这并不影响日常使用。
性能 -Galaxy S23与定制的SoC
Galaxy S23使用与其两个姐妹型号相同的SoC:骁龙8代2的Galaxy 。骁龙8代2的这个变体 ,是一个具有更高时钟的主核。这两个变种都能利用8GB的LPDDR5x内存。
单核CPU的性能相应地高于竞争对手;只有iPhone在这方面更快。三星智能手机在系统性能方面也提供了非常好的结果,这反映在日常使用中,因为系统的反应非常快,总是能顺利工作。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1542 - 1598, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4906 - 5198, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.0 | |
Single-Core | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1958 - 1976, n=3) | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (5043 - 5221, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years) |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1286774, n=8) | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17267, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Vivo X90 Pro |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years) |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8) |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1216 - 156427, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
Geekbench ML | |
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (620 - 636, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average of class Smartphone (215 - 1418, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (2440 - 2443, n=2) | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 2842, n=19, last 2 years) | |
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (344 - 3638, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (672 - 679, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 |
ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740能够有非常高的性能。它是否也得到了一个小的性能提升并不完全清楚。在任何情况下,GFXBench的4k测试都支持这一点,因为S23在这项测试中表现出色。然而,在其他测试中,它提供了较弱的结果,这是由于冷却不足造成的。稍后会有更多关于这方面的内容。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 |
在我们的基准测试中,Galaxy S23的浏览器性能非常好。只有iPhone 14 Pro更快。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8) | |
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109) | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16) |
* ... smaller is better
128GB版本只使用旧的UFS 3.1存储,而256GB型号则使用UFS 4.0。通过比较可以看出,较新标准的性能提升主要是在连续阅读中明显,否则提升不是太明显,这也是由于Galaxy S23中UFS 4.0的写入速度远远低于其能力。
Samsung Galaxy S23 | Xiaomi 13 | Vivo X90 Pro | Google Pixel 7 | Asus Zenfone 9 | Samsung Galaxy S22 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 117% | 114% | -11% | 49% | -2% | -11% | 1% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3133.7 ? 1686.71 ? | 3454.01 10% | 3866.75 23% | 1280.81 -59% | 1986.97 -37% | 1486 -53% | 1602 ? -49% | 1471 ? -53% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 844 ? 628.53 ? | 2722.77 223% | 2643.38 213% | 879.39 4% | 1776.21 110% | 993 18% | 778 ? -8% | 1084 ? 28% |
Random Read 4KB | 427.61 ? 343.65 ? | 393.81 -8% | 367.89 -14% | 210.47 -51% | 298.46 -30% | 273 -36% | 244 ? -43% | 243 ? -43% |
Random Write 4KB | 156.69 ? 130.26 ? | 536.76 243% | 521.43 233% | 253.92 62% | 398.39 154% | 257.6 64% | 245 ? 56% | 267 ? 70% |
游戏--限制最少的乐趣
ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740确保了Galaxy 23的强大游戏性能,我们用GameBench进行了测试。.
像《地铁冲浪》这样的休闲游戏对智能手机来说没有问题,即使是在120赫兹的情况下。射击游戏PUBG Mobile也能以非常稳定的帧率工作。只有《暗黑破坏神:不朽 》有一些小插曲,这很可能是一个优化问题,应该很快就会解决。然而,令人遗憾的是,目前还不能为该游戏选择最高的图形细节级别。
排放物--三星智能手机中的冷却功能较弱
温度
三星Galaxy S23的表面温度在任何时候都保持令人愉快的低水平。即使在持续的负载下,该智能手机也不会变得如此温热。
然而,这是有代价的,因为在3DMark Wild Life(Extreme)的压力测试中,S23并没有被证明是特别稳定的,在较长的时间内失去了30%以上的初始性能。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 | |
Apple iPhone 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 | |
Asus Zenfone 9 |
发言人
三星Galaxy S23的两个扬声器经过AKG的优化,支持杜比全景声。声音质量相对较好,但S23 Ultra在粉红噪声测量图中要好一点。
有线耳机可以连接到USB-C端口,这可能需要一个适配器。蓝牙5.3可以无线使用,但遗憾的是,音频编解码器的支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和三星无缝(SSC))还有待改进。
Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 3,900毫安时的长时间运行
消耗功率
Galaxy S23的耗电量非常低。只有在GFXBench中调整了显示亮度(150cd/m²)的情况下,它才明显高于小米13.
与这两个更大的兄弟姐妹相比,必须做出的妥协是S23的充电功率降低,通过电缆限制在25瓦,需要相对较长的时间,即80分钟才能充满电。无线充电需要更长的时间,因为这时只可能有15瓦的功率。无线PowerShare也在其中。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.11 Watt |
Idle | 0.57 / 0.74 / 0.83 Watt |
Load |
4.26 / 6.16 Watt |
Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh | Vivo X90 Pro 4870 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -25% | -90% | -22% | -34% | -48% | -124% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.76 -33% | 0.56 2% | 0.9 -58% | 0.89 -56% | 1.01 -77% | 0.69 -21% | 1.531 ? -169% | 0.896 ? -57% |
Idle Average * | 0.74 | 1.1 -49% | 1.37 -85% | 2.32 -214% | 1.07 -45% | 1.1 -49% | 1.19 -61% | 1.848 ? -150% | 1.449 ? -96% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.83 | 1.13 -36% | 1.42 -71% | 2.39 -188% | 1.2 -45% | 1.17 -41% | 1.26 -52% | 1.998 ? -141% | 1.629 ? -96% |
Load Average * | 4.26 | 2.99 30% | 3.42 20% | 3.64 15% | 3.27 23% | 3.3 23% | 6.97 -64% | 7.9 ? -85% | 5.51 ? -29% |
Load Maximum * | 6.16 | 6.63 -8% | 5.56 10% | 6.53 -6% | 5.5 11% | 7.89 -28% | 8.85 -44% | 10.7 ? -74% | 8.19 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
三星Galaxy S23的电池寿命非常好,尽管它的电池容量相对较小,只有3,900毫安时。
这款三星智能手机还陪同我们参加了世界移动通信大会,并以其耐力给我们带来了积极的惊喜,因为尽管在交易会期间密集使用,但电池在晚间仍然有50%以上的电量。如果你只是零星地使用这款智能手机,你肯定会有足够的电量使用几天,尤其是S23在待机时非常节俭。
Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 14 Pro 3200 mAh | Vivo X90 Pro 4870 mAh | Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 14% | 3% | -2% | -24% | 0% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 2249 | 2983 33% | 2659 18% | 1063 -53% | 1685 -25% | 2182 -3% | |
H.264 | 1255 | 1221 -3% | 1397 11% | 1230 -2% | 1401 12% | 887 -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 926 | 1021 10% | 807 -13% | 909 -2% | 731 -21% | 825 -11% | 675 -27% |
Load | 370 | 423 14% | 351 -5% | 302 -18% | 462 25% | 324 -12% |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Galaxy S23原来是一个强大的升级版
三星Galaxy S23在今年取得了最大的飞跃,赶上了 Galaxy S23+.这一点在显示屏亮度方面尤其明显,现在已经处于同一水平。WLAN标准也进行了调整,但遗憾的是Wi-Fi 7被省略了。
除了更大的显示屏,S23+还提供了一个不成比例的更大的电池,它可以实现更长的运行时间,并且在45瓦的情况下,也可以更快充电。此外,S23仍然没有UWB。
三星Galaxy S23无疑是2023年最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。
在测试中,Galaxy S23的得分是:语音质量好,更新供应时间长,性能强,两边的摄像头都不错。电池运行时间也非常好,LTPO-AMOLED显示屏可以变得非常明亮,但色彩再现并不完全完美。
紧凑的替代品是 华硕Zenfone 9或 小米13.小米13 iPhone 13 mini尤其是更小,但也有技术上的妥协。
价格和可用性
在美国,Galaxy S23的128GB型号起价为S799.99。256GB的价格为999.99美元。
建议用户在亚马逊等流行的转售商处(如适用)看看,在那里可以偶尔以略微便宜的价格买到该智能手机。
Samsung Galaxy S23
-
03/09/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.