Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S23评论。小巧的S23智能手机实现了最大的飞跃

全速前进。 Galaxy S23是三星高端系列中最小的智能手机,但在今年迈出了最大的一步,弥补了大型机型中的许多硬件差距,甚至增加了电池容量。继续阅读以了解更多。
5G Android Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy S系列中最小的智能手机不仅具有最小的物理尺寸,而且近年来总是比Plus型号稍弱。今年,两个变体之间的唯一区别是UWB芯片,而S23缺乏该芯片。

除此之外,Galaxy 智能手机在外观上与前代产品几乎没有变化,即S22,而且只略有增长,但被赋予了一个更大的电池。继续阅读,在此了解改进的显示屏、新的 骁龙8代2的Galaxy和更大的电池是否证明是成功的。

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 422 PPI, capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 48 - 120 Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 98.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Rotation, Proximity, Orientation, Pressure, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 146.3 x 70.9
Battery
3900 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN3, f/1.8, 85°, 23 mm, OIS, DPAF) + 12 MPix (Sony IMX564, Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120°, 13 mm, PDAF) + 10 MPix (Samsung S5K3K1, 3x opt. Zoom, f/2.4, 36°, 69 mm, OIS, DPAF)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung S5K3LU, f/2.2, 80°, 25 mm, HDR10+)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, Dolby Atmos, Wireless PowerShare, DeX, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5); Head-SAR: 0.963 W/Kg, Body-SAR: 1.304 W/Kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
167 g
Price
949 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.5 %
03/2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
89.1 %
02/2023
Xiaomi 13
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
189 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2400x1080
90.3 %
01/2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
89.1 %
02/2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
214.9 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
88.5 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
88.6 %
09/2022
Asus Zenfone 9
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.90"2400x1080
没有必要:S23的框架上有很多金属箔(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
没有必要:S23的框架上有很多铝箔

三星Galaxy S23总共有六种颜色,其中奶油色、幻影黑、绿色和薰衣草色在商店广泛销售,石墨色和青柠色则通过三星商店独家销售。

这款智能手机又可以明确无误地识别为Galaxy 智能手机。然而,三星将摄像头的设计与Ultra机型的设计保持一致。这款手机从外壳上突出了2.3毫米,因此,智能手机在平坦的表面上时,会有轻微的晃动。

制造质量很好。缝隙很紧,非常均匀。S23很容易经受住扭转的压力,但会有轻微的吱吱声。框架由抛光的Armor铝制成,正面和背面的玻璃是康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus 2。它的手感很好,有一种高质量的感觉,但尽管有磨砂的背面,却相当容易沾染指纹。

Galaxy S23又是根据IP68认证,既防尘又防水。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

164.1 mm 74.5 mm 9.3 mm 214.9 g155.6 mm 73.2 mm 8.7 mm 197 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 7.98 mm 189 g146.5 mm 68.1 mm 9.1 mm 169 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g146 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 -Galaxy S23,不含UWB

今年,三星Galaxy S23再次利用了USB 3.2(Gen. 1),支持有线图像输出和OTG。后者允许外围设备和外部存储媒体连接到智能手机上。该接口能够实现高数据传输率,在我们的复制测试中实现了252MB/s的传输率。

有128或256GB的存储空间可供选择。我们推荐较大的型号:因为没有microSD插槽,这一方面提供了更大的容量,另一方面,较小的存储变量,即我们的测试设备,仍然有较慢的UFS 3.1存储。三星通知我们,UFS 4.0(到目前为止)不在这种小单元中生产。

S23也没有超宽带芯片(UWB),所以不可能使用三星智能手机的数字键。此外,既没有集成红外发射器、无线电接收器,也没有音频插孔。

头部一侧。麦克风 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
头部一侧。麦克风
左侧 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
左侧
右侧:音量摇杆、功能键 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
右侧:音量摇杆、功能键
下巴一侧:扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风、SIM卡(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
下巴一侧:扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风、SIM卡

软件--三星DeX和漫长的更新周期

三星Galaxy S23配备了谷歌Android 13,在审查时是最新的,并配备了内部的One UI 5.1。与Galaxy S系列的所有智能手机一样,S23也会收到四个系统升级和额外一年的安全补丁。后者每月都会发布,但这种情况是否会持续到最后一年还不完全清楚。话说回来, Galaxy S20仍然每月收到安全补丁,所以这在未来几年不太可能改变。

除了谷歌的应用,三星自己的应用也可以在S23上使用,以及Galaxy App Store。Facebook、Netflix、Spotify和各种微软应用也预装在三星智能手机上。除了OneDrive之外,所有第三方应用都可以完全卸载,而上述应用只能停用。

桌面模式DeX也被支持,既可以通过无线方式使用,也可以通过一个可选的电缆使用。后者的变体工作起来更顺畅。

通信和GNSS - 快速的WLAN和精确的定位

三星Galaxy S23为所有移动通信标准提供了广泛的频率范围,与更昂贵的机型相比,在这方面没有任何妥协。大都市地区的接收值主观上非常好,没有给人以批评的理由。

虽然Galaxy 智能手机不支持Wi-Fi 7,但在我们与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,它在5.0和6.0 GHz网络中都取得了非常高和稳定的传输率。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
894 (min: 803) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
770 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1894 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1656 (min: 1620) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼47%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1787 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
229 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
919 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1715 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
683 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1543 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1376 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼76%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (955-1923)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1620-1684)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (803-944)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø755 (459-912)
GPS测试:在室内
在室内
GPS测试:户外
在户外

使用三星Galaxy S23进行定位,无论是在户外还是在室内都非常迅速和准确。

为了能够更准确地评估智能手机的定位能力,我们带着它进行了一次短途骑行,在这期间,我们将它与佳明Venu 2。在一条不到10公里的路线上,两台设备的距离只有30米。在对路线的详细总结中,两者的表现都不是很好,显示出一些不准确的地方;Garmin手表总是更准确一点。尽管如此,S23为日常导航任务提供了良好的装备。

GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:总结
GNSS试骑:总结

电话和语音质量

电话应用
电话应用

三星Galaxy S23的电话功能在测试中表现良好。当拿在耳边时,语音质量处于非常好的水平,对于接收者来说,来自大群人的嘈杂背景噪音完全被消除了。扬声器也能带来体面的对话体验,即使用户离S23有两米远,也能正常理解。

支持VoLTE和WiFi通话等功能,但系统中没有实现SIP账户支持。Galaxy 智能手机有两个nano-SIM卡插槽,但也可以使用eSIM卡而不是实体SIM卡。

照相机 -Galaxy S23中的良好的三合一相机

与Galaxy S23自拍(纵向模式)。
与Galaxy S23自拍(纵向模式)。

Galaxy S23的前置摄像头已被完全重新设计,现在整个S23系列都是一样的。光学系统再次依靠自动对焦,提供了很多设置和过滤器的选项,并能以每秒60帧的速度录制超高清视频。其结果令人印象深刻。

主摄像头的核心是一个5000万像素的传感器,使用像素分选来生成12.5万像素的图像。图片也可以以全分辨率拍摄。在白天,照片很好,有很高的细节水平,但显得有些过度锐化。当有背光时,对比度也会受到一些影响。照片格式为4:3、16:9、全屏(19.5:9)和1:1。

超广角使用了与S23 Ultra相同的传感器, ,这比去年的机型有明显的改进。然而,景深可以更明显一些,外围区域的锐度明显下降。

第三个镜头是一个三倍光学放大镜,它和主传感器一样,可以利用光学图像稳定(OIS)。白天的照片很好,但分辨率可以再高一点。如果你想更接近拍摄对象,你可以使用30倍数码变焦。最大的放大倍数其实并不适合拍照,但高达10倍的变焦对社交媒体来说是足够的。在低光照情况下,照片会变得非常嘈杂,很少好看。与其他S23机型一样,S23也有专家RAW应用和专业模式。

在最好的情况下,视频以8k记录,最高30FPS,而超高清(最高60FPS)和全高清(最高120FPS)与HDR10+也可用。一些设置可以通过专业模式手动调整,也可以使用21:9的长宽比。

主传感器 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
3倍变焦 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
10倍变焦 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
10倍变焦 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)

变焦水平(从左):广角(1x),3x,10x,30x

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,三星Galaxy S23显示出体面的色彩再现。然而,在含有绿色和蓝色元素的颜色中,DeltaE的偏差相当高,而且比它们应该的要亮得多。

测试图的拍摄效果很好,许多小细节都被保留了下来,但并非所有区域的锐度都是最佳的。这种现象更多地发生在孤立的点上,但也不是特别明显。

ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23: 9.23 ∆E min: 3.19 - max: 16.04 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23: 16.89 ∆E min: 8.46 - max: 26.09 ∆E

配件和保修 - 只包括基本的东西

第三方电源适配器明显更便宜。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
第三方电源适配器明显更便宜。

三星Galaxy S23采用非常平坦的盒子包装,这表明除了智能手机之外,几乎没有什么东西包括在内。毕竟,三星在这里使用了完全回收的纸张。打开后,里面只有一条USB-C电缆、一个SIM卡工具和几张薄薄的信息单。电源适配器需要选择购买,在三星商店的建议零售价约为35美元。

S23在德国有24个月的保修期,这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

这可以通过Care+保险包来扩展,可以购买一年或两年的保险,还包括额外的盗窃保险。这个保险包的范围也可能因国家而异。例如,在美国,买家可以选择10美元/月(最长36个月),可以随时取消,或者选择189美元的2年计划(在纽约不提供)。当你提出索赔时,可能需要支付99-199美元的免赔额或29-99美元的服务费,而且在12个月内最多可以提出三次保险索赔。

输入设备和操作 - 240赫兹的触摸屏

Galaxy S23的电容式触摸屏的表面具有良好的滑行性能,并以240赫兹的采样率工作。输入的信息被很好地识别,并迅速而准确地执行。

生物识别安全由集成在显示屏上的超声波指纹传感器提供,其作用非常迅速和可靠。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头使用不太安全的面部识别解锁。

电源键被用作功能键,启动内部语言助手Bixby ex works。这也可以在设置中切换回作为经典电源键的功能。此外,相机或任何其他应用程序可以通过按两次电源键来启动。在这方面,S23丝毫不逊于其较大的兄弟姐妹们。

显示 -Galaxy S23的更多亮度

子像素网格
子像素网格

三星Galaxy S23使用6.1英寸(15.49厘米)的AMOLED显示屏,分辨率为2,340 x 1,080(全高清+),因此显示效果清晰。如果你想省电,你可以把分辨率降低到HD+。LTPO面板的刷新率在48和120赫兹之间动态调整;将其固定在60赫兹也是可以选择的。包括的HDR标准有HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,但不包括Dolby Vision。

不像去年的前辈Galaxy S23,与更昂贵的型号相比,不再需要满足于降低的最大亮度。在激活环境光传感器的情况下,在纯白的显示屏上可以达到1122cd/m²的高亮度。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布(APL18),在测试中这甚至增加到1653 cd/m²。如果你喜欢手动调节亮度,你有高达431 cd/m²的亮度可供选择。通过额外的亮度选项,这可以提高到730cd/m²。最低显示亮度的情况与此类似,在正常情况下,最低亮度为1.24cd/m²,相对较低。如果你打开输入帮助中的额外调光功能,你可以将亮度降低到0.9cd/m²。

像所有的OLED一样,S23的OLED也会闪动。这在最低亮度时以非常稳定的120赫兹发生。亮度增加了一点(>3%),成为一个恒定的240赫兹,周期曲线非常均匀。这表明永久的直流调光,对眼睛来说应该是容易的。没有检测到时间上的抖动。

1111
cd/m²
1114
cd/m²
1142
cd/m²
1128
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²
1143
cd/m²
1131
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1093
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1143 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1122.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1125 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.97
Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi 13
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10
Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30
Asus Zenfone 9
AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.90
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Screen
26%
23%
25%
21%
7%
12%
Brightness middle
1125
1209
7%
1046
-7%
1018
-10%
936
-17%
793
-30%
853
-24%
Brightness
1122
1208
8%
1049
-7%
1026
-9%
947
-16%
796
-29%
858
-24%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
98
2%
93
-3%
95
-1%
97
1%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.2
1.2
62%
1.2
62%
0.9
72%
1.3
59%
1.9
41%
1.9
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.9
3
39%
3.1
37%
2.2
55%
2.7
45%
3.4
31%
3.2
35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.1
36%
1.7
48%
1.9
42%
1.4
58%
2.3
30%
1.9
42%
Gamma
1.97 112%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
CCT
6504 100%
6504 100%
6538 99%
6473 100%
6664 98%
6860 95%
6460 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

Galaxy S23的色彩准确性与S23+S23 Ultra 的水平相似。在设置中选择自然 模式时,面板的色彩表现最为自然。然而,这时它只使用较小的sRGB色彩空间。

给出的质量很好,但对于高端智能手机来说,它可以更准确一些。

灰度(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9365 ms rise
↘ 0.836 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6965 ms rise
↘ 0.663 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

在户外,三星Galaxy S23给人留下了非常好的印象,在所有照明条件下都有足够的亮度能力。反射是存在的,但不是太明显。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy S23中的AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。在非常平坦的视角下,亮度会有所下降,显示屏会变得更冷。然而,这并不影响日常使用。

三星Galaxy S23的可视角度稳定性
三星Galaxy S23的可视角度稳定性

性能 -Galaxy S23与定制的SoC

Galaxy S23使用与其两个姐妹型号相同的SoC:骁龙8代2的Galaxy骁龙8代2的这个变体 ,是一个具有更高时钟的主核。这两个变种都能利用8GB的LPDDR5x内存。

单核CPU的性能相应地高于竞争对手;只有iPhone在这方面更快。三星智能手机在系统性能方面也提供了非常好的结果,这反映在日常使用中,因为系统的反应非常快,总是能顺利工作。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1542 - 1598, n=7)
1561 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1478 Points -5%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -11%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1322 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5090 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (4906 - 5198, n=7)
5020 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
4436 Points -11%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points -41%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2531 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1971 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1958 - 1976, n=3)
1968 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1669 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6460 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (5043 - 5221, n=3)
5130 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5126 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points -33%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1273775 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)
1181107 Points +4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1081005 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
16528 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (15270 - 17267, n=8)
16185 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14094 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points -31%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1120 - 1332, n=8)
1239 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1219 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1163 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points -22%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years)
830 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8541 - 9337, n=8)
8859 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8273 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8153 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -21%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
13646 Points -5%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12637 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1374 - 14401, n=8)
12462 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points -22%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points -33%
Memory
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8467 - 9212, n=8)
8823 Points -1%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8263 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8179 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points -39%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (21505 - 31928, n=8)
28672 Points +7%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23966 Points -10%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
22938 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -35%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points -48%
Web
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1982 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +8%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1460 - 2032, n=8)
1768 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1652 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points -16%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -53%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
82462 Points +394%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points +166%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points +155%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21887 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15961 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1267 - 16702, n=8)
14423 Points -14%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37396 Points +2733%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points +2314%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1216 - 156427, n=6)
27143 Points +1956%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=99, last 2 years)
16322 Points +1137%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1410 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1002 Points -24%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1043 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (620 - 636, n=2)
628 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
620 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=19, last 2 years)
604 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
579 Points -7%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2522 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2443 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (2440 - 2443, n=2)
2442 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1833 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=19, last 2 years)
1780 Points -27%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3190 Points +375%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=17, last 2 years)
1668 Points +148%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (672 - 679, n=2)
676 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
672 Points
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
545 Points -19%

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740能够有非常高的性能。它是否也得到了一个小的性能提升并不完全清楚。在任何情况下,GFXBench的4k测试都支持这一点,因为S23在这项测试中表现出色。然而,在其他测试中,它提供了较弱的结果,这是由于冷却不足造成的。稍后会有更多关于这方面的内容。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3707 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -12%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2698 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points -50%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1800 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3751 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -12%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points -50%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1841 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14002 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -11%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11087 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points -46%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6660 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4177 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25306 Points +16%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points -45%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points -47%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11914 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points -41%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
395 fps -14%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -34%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps -29%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
176 fps -35%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -6%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps -27%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -34%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -39%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -52%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -15%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -26%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -29%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps -7%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -15%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -28%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -32%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps -12%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -16%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -48%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -11%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -19%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -6%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -46%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps -6%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -21%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -21%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps -17%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps -23%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -53%

在我们的基准测试中,Galaxy S23的浏览器性能非常好。只有iPhone 14 Pro更快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)
173.4 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
147.648 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
143.264 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
96.4 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points -39%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)
168.7 runs/min +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
113 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
111 runs/min -18%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min -23%
Asus Zenfone 9
102 runs/min -25%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min -26%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -56%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
202 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)
165.5 Points +13%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
146 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
136 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=153, last 2 years)
98.7 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points -36%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)
59058 Points -1%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
54646 Points -9%
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points -25%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
43632 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
38992 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points -44%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -163%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * -136%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
1566 ms * -123%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * -46%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
870.7 ms * -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)
795 ms * -13%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
768.66 ms * -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

128GB版本只使用旧的UFS 3.1存储,而256GB型号则使用UFS 4.0。通过比较可以看出,较新标准的性能提升主要是在连续阅读中明显,否则提升不是太明显,这也是由于Galaxy S23中UFS 4.0的写入速度远远低于其能力。

Samsung Galaxy S23Xiaomi 13Vivo X90 ProGoogle Pixel 7Asus Zenfone 9Samsung Galaxy S22Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
117%
114%
-11%
49%
-2%
-11%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)

3454.01
10%
3866.75
23%
1280.81
-59%
1986.97
-37%
1486
-53%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=55)
-49%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
844 ?(UFS 4.0)

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)

2722.77
223%
2643.38
213%
879.39
4%
1776.21
110%
993
18%
778 ?(233 - 1332, n=55)
-8%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
28%
Random Read 4KB
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)

393.81
-8%
367.89
-14%
210.47
-51%
298.46
-30%
273
-36%
244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=55)
-43%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
-43%
Random Write 4KB
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)

536.76
243%
521.43
233%
253.92
62%
398.39
154%
257.6
64%
245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=55)
56%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
70%

游戏--限制最少的乐趣

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740确保了Galaxy 23的强大游戏性能,我们用GameBench进行了测试。.

像《地铁冲浪》这样的休闲游戏对智能手机来说没有问题,即使是在120赫兹的情况下。射击游戏PUBG Mobile也能以非常稳定的帧率工作。只有《暗黑破坏神:不朽 》有一些小插曲,这很可能是一个优化问题,应该很快就会解决。然而,令人遗憾的是,目前还不能为该游戏选择最高的图形细节级别。

地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.4.0: Ø59.7 (56-60)
Samsung Galaxy S23; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.4.0: Ø40 (39-41)
Samsung Galaxy S23; Subway Surfers; 3.8.0: Ø119.5 (111-120)
Samsung Galaxy S23; Diablo Immortal; 1.7.3: Ø59 (28-60)

排放物--三星智能手机中的冷却功能较弱

温度

三星Galaxy S23的表面温度在任何时候都保持令人愉快的低水平。即使在持续的负载下,该智能手机也不会变得如此温热。

然而,这是有代价的,因为在3DMark Wild Life(Extreme)的压力测试中,S23并没有被证明是特别稳定的,在较长的时间内失去了30%以上的初始性能。

Max. Load
 29.8 °C29.5 °C28.2 °C 
 30.6 °C30 °C28.5 °C 
 30.3 °C30.2 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
28.6 °C29 °C30.1 °C
28.4 °C28.3 °C30.2 °C
28.4 °C28.5 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 % +20%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.9 % +15%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 %
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.5 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % -18%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +52%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.1 % +47%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72.9 % +36%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 % +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 %
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52.8 % -2%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø15 (13.7-20.2)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø53.3 (48.7-59.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø57.9 (54.7-74.4)

发言人

三星Galaxy S23的两个扬声器经过AKG的优化,支持杜比全景声。声音质量相对较好,但S23 Ultra在粉红噪声测量图中要好一点。

有线耳机可以连接到USB-C端口,这可能需要一个适配器。蓝牙5.3可以无线使用,但遗憾的是,音频编解码器的支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和三星无缝(SSC))还有待改进。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.839.12527.936.93124.332.94028.234.65036.742.86322.238.98025.439.51002141.912518.646.716015.453.520015.155.625013.160.13151262.440012.762.950011.866.963012.966.780010.471.5100013.375.9125013.278.4160012.178.9200012.281.2250012.981.4315014.881400015.881.7500016.180.7630014.481.8800013.6791000013.576.81250014.471.4160001567.8SPL25.991.5N0.788median 13.5median 75.9Delta1.39.735.630.935.22632.630.32928.837.437.630.632.329.334.726.732.324.341.822.555.518.856.716.258.11257.49.95911.76710.367.811.967.61270.612.174.3127612.179.512.777.812.779.312.98013.378.913.279.113.680.313.676.213.368.812.764.225.189.50.778median 12.7median 70.6210hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S23Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 14 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 3,900毫安时的长时间运行

消耗功率

Galaxy S23的耗电量非常低。只有在GFXBench中调整了显示亮度(150cd/m²)的情况下,它才明显高于小米13.

与这两个更大的兄弟姐妹相比,必须做出的妥协是S23的充电功率降低,通过电缆限制在25瓦,需要相对较长的时间,即80分钟才能充满电。无线充电需要更长的时间,因为这时只可能有15瓦的功率。无线PowerShare也在其中。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.57 / 0.74 / 0.83 Watt
Load midlight 4.26 / 6.16 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Xiaomi 13
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-25%
-90%
-22%
-34%
-48%
-124%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.76
-33%
0.56
2%
0.9
-58%
0.89
-56%
1.01
-77%
0.69
-21%
1.531 ?(0.44 - 3.4, n=8)
-169%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-57%
Idle Average *
0.74
1.1
-49%
1.37
-85%
2.32
-214%
1.07
-45%
1.1
-49%
1.19
-61%
1.848 ?(0.69 - 3.68, n=8)
-150%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
-96%
Idle Maximum *
0.83
1.13
-36%
1.42
-71%
2.39
-188%
1.2
-45%
1.17
-41%
1.26
-52%
1.998 ?(0.83 - 3.91, n=8)
-141%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
-96%
Load Average *
4.26
2.99
30%
3.42
20%
3.64
15%
3.27
23%
3.3
23%
6.97
-64%
7.9 ?(3.99 - 15.8, n=8)
-85%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Maximum *
6.16
6.63
-8%
5.56
10%
6.53
-6%
5.5
11%
7.89
-28%
8.85
-44%
10.7 ?(6.16 - 15.9, n=8)
-74%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.84 (0.888-13.8)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.833 (0.772-1.019)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (6.97-8.54)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.833 (0.772-1.019)

电池寿命

三星Galaxy S23的电池寿命非常好,尽管它的电池容量相对较小,只有3,900毫安时。

这款三星智能手机还陪同我们参加了世界移动通信大会,并以其耐力给我们带来了积极的惊喜,因为尽管在交易会期间密集使用,但电池在晚间仍然有50%以上的电量。如果你只是零星地使用这款智能手机,你肯定会有足够的电量使用几天,尤其是S23在待机时非常节俭。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 109)
15h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 10min
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Xiaomi 13
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
3%
-2%
-24%
0%
-18%
Reader / Idle
2249
2983
33%
2659
18%
1063
-53%
1685
-25%
2182
-3%
H.264
1255
1221
-3%
1397
11%
1230
-2%
1401
12%
887
-29%
WiFi v1.3
926
1021
10%
807
-13%
909
-2%
731
-21%
825
-11%
675
-27%
Load
370
423
14%
351
-5%
302
-18%
462
25%
324
-12%

Pros

+ 明亮的120赫兹AMOLED
+ 功率大
+ IP68 认证
+ 长时间的更新供应
+ 良好的三摄像头和前置摄像头

Cons

- 没有--Wi-Fi 7
- 没有--Wi-Fi 7
- 充电速度慢

结论 -Galaxy S23原来是一个强大的升级版

在审查中。三星Galaxy S23。测试装置由德国三星公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
在审查中。三星Galaxy S23。测试装置由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy S23在今年取得了最大的飞跃,赶上了 Galaxy S23+.这一点在显示屏亮度方面尤其明显,现在已经处于同一水平。WLAN标准也进行了调整,但遗憾的是Wi-Fi 7被省略了。

除了更大的显示屏,S23+还提供了一个不成比例的更大的电池,它可以实现更长的运行时间,并且在45瓦的情况下,也可以更快充电。此外,S23仍然没有UWB。

三星Galaxy S23无疑是2023年最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。

在测试中,Galaxy S23的得分是:语音质量好,更新供应时间长,性能强,两边的摄像头都不错。电池运行时间也非常好,LTPO-AMOLED显示屏可以变得非常明亮,但色彩再现并不完全完美。

紧凑的替代品是 华硕Zenfone 9小米13.小米13 iPhone 13 mini尤其是更小,但也有技术上的妥协。

价格和可用性

在美国,Galaxy S23的128GB型号起价为S799.99。256GB的价格为999.99美元。

建议用户在亚马逊等流行的转售商处(如适用)看看,在那里可以偶尔以略微便宜的价格买到该智能手机。

Samsung Galaxy S23 - 03/09/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 96%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
93 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
80%
Average
85%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S23评论。小巧的S23智能手机实现了最大的飞跃
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-03-11 (Update: 2023-03-11)