Notebookcheck

惠普 Omen 17 (GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck (translated by Yuchen Wang), 02/11/2017
Gaming Geforce Notebook Skylake Windows

均衡。售价近1300欧元(约9515人民币),Omen 17 w100ng是这个产品线中售价最低的一台设备。尽管性能相对较弱,但也可以满足在它的雾面全高清屏幕上流畅运行游戏所需。作为一台游戏笔记本电脑这台Omen提供了非常优秀的电池续航表现。

HP Omen 17-w100ng (Omen Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), 192 bit 界面, ForceWare 376.33, no Optimus, iGPU deaktiviert
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 双通道, 两个内存槽 (均已占用)
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 全高清, G-Sync, 75 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, m.2固态硬盘+ HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm
Soundcard
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机-输出接口,麦克风-输入接口, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Battery
95.8 Wh, 0 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 四个扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器: 230 瓦, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), 许多生产商工具软件, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.23 kg, Power Supply: 811 g
Price
1300 Euro

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼99%
326
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 364 cd/m² Average: 331 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 1069:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | - Ø
86% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Response Times
-1%
41%
1%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35 (14, 21)
38 (12, 26)
-9%
28 (13.2, 14.8)
20%
33.6 (14, 19.6)
4%
37 (13, 24)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (4, 21)
23 (5, 18)
8%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
62%
25.6 (5.2, 20.4)
-2%
24 (4, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-30%
14%
-9%
2%
Brightness
331
312
-6%
315
-5%
321
-3%
342
3%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
86
2%
93
11%
87
4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.5
-56%
0.308
4%
0.267
17%
0.31
3%
Contrast
1069
652
-39%
1095
2%
1233
15%
1168
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.35
6.3
-45%
2.96
32%
5.93
-36%
4.5
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.73
7.37
-98%
2.57
31%
6.72
-80%
3.48
7%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.37 101%
2.25 107%
2.12 113%
2.23 108%
CCT
6801 96%
7116 91%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
55
-4%
74.3
30%
57
0%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
83
-3%
100
16%
87
1%
84
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -24%
28% / 19%
-4% / -7%
1% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8258
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4815
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
59.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
464 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼95% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼89%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
118 Points ∼80% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼100% +46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼99% +45%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼94% +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
468 Points ∼69% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼68%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
461 Points ∼68% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼93% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5026 Points ∼92% +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points ∼90% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4815 Points ∼88%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4759 Points ∼87% -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼99% +22%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼99% +22%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16609 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16456 Points ∼81%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16161 Points ∼80% -2%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points ∼100% +28%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9520 Points ∼80% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9307 Points ∼78%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3301 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3168 Points ∼96%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points ∼89% -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
10421 Points ∼94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3933 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points ∼93% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.16 Points ∼100% +22%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼94% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.36 Points ∼86% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.83 Points ∼86% +5%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
220.38 Points ∼82%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
196.11 Points ∼73% -11%
PCMark 7 Score
5990 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4711 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6858 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5252 points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼97%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼89% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼89% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼97% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼87% -11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼83% -15%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 495 MB/s
Sequential Write: 180.2 MB/s
512K Read: 315.5 MB/s
512K Write: 172.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.25 MB/s
4K Write: 76.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 141.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.8 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
13%
43%
122%
Write 4k QD32
170.8
1.186
-99%
167.1
-2%
274.9
61%
295.3
73%
Read 4k QD32
141.6
1.106
-99%
251.6
78%
273.9
93%
600.2
324%
Write 4k
76.14
1.146
-98%
42.51
-44%
84.59
11%
153.3
101%
Read 4k
20.25
0.602
-97%
20.3
0%
25.93
28%
42.7
111%
Write 512
172.4
63.33
-63%
254.4
48%
314.4
82%
294.7
71%
Read 512
315.5
44.85
-86%
242.3
-23%
303.1
-4%
616.2
95%
Write Seq
180.2
130.6
-28%
319
77%
315.4
75%
294.9
64%
Read Seq
495
134.6
-73%
334.3
-32%
481.7
-3%
1156
134%
3DMark 06 Standard
24318 points
3DMark 11 Performance
10805 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
111645 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15394 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8654 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4806 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3339 points
Help
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11506 Points ∼73% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼72%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼72% 0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
86780 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
79578 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼91% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼86%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
67791 Points ∼78% -10%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23356 Points ∼100% +60%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼88% +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14904 Points ∼64% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼63%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼61% -2%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
123.8 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼84% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
100 fps ∼81% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼80%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼80% 0%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.1 fps ∼79% -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼76% -5%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
101.5 fps ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
92.9 fps ∼92% -8%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
110.1 fps ∼100% +40%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼72% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼71%
Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
81.1 fps ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79.2 fps ∼98% +22%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
64.7 fps ∼80%
low med. high ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 290.5289.2274.9140fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.8176.2164.899.1fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 188.8172.8155.7101.5fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 81.97564.730.2fps
Just Cause 3 (2015) 94.68376.770.4fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 94827359fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 97.19356.529.2fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 276.7270.8222.5227.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 136.4117.586.678.5fps
Civilization VI (2016) 58.147.14342.8fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.5143.589.780fps

Noise Level

Idle
35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Load
44 / 54 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
10%
6%
4%
4%
off / environment *
31
30.5
2%
28.4
8%
29.7
4%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
35
31.4
10%
31.9
9%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Idle Average *
36
31.4
13%
32
11%
33.2
8%
34
6%
Idle Maximum *
37
31.5
15%
34
8%
33.2
10%
35
5%
Load Average *
44
40.9
7%
47
-7%
47.5
-8%
45
-2%
Load Maximum *
54
46.2
14%
49.4
9%
52.5
3%
52
4%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 41.5 °C39.1 °C39.3 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C33.4 °C 
 32.5 °C33.5 °C29.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 36 °C
44.9 °C42.4 °C45.5 °C
30.2 °C35.3 °C37.7 °C
23.3 °C27.7 °C24.5 °C
Maximum: 45.5 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
-11%
-9%
-24%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.5
53.1
-28%
50.8
-22%
59
-42%
45
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
45.5
44.9
1%
60
-32%
66
-45%
54.3
-19%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
32.9
-3%
27.4
14%
33.2
-4%
29.6
7%
Idle Bottom *
29.6
33.4
-13%
28.8
3%
30.6
-3%
28.6
3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.937.82539.544.63133.238.44028.830.75025.227.16326.126.98025.328.710024.829.21252430.216025.140.920021.655.125022.26431521.167.540019.968.150019.567.66301971.780020.474.1100018.770.9125019.468.8160019.674.2200018.172.9250017.871315017.875400017.976.3500017.975.5630017.977.480001876.11000017.981.41250017.8791600017.769.6SPL30.887N1.572.4median 19HP Omen 17-w100ngmedian 71Delta2.17.239.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 18.4median 56.54.424.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 17 / 22 / 29 Watt
Load midlight 72 / 141 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
3%
-35%
-40%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
17
15.6
8%
22.6
-33%
18.4
-8%
19
-12%
Idle Average *
22
20.2
8%
32.7
-49%
22.8
-4%
25
-14%
Idle Maximum *
29
21.4
26%
32.8
-13%
24
17%
31
-7%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
114.7
-59%
175.5
-144%
90
-25%
Load Maximum *
141
147
-4%
167.9
-19%
229.5
-63%
193
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 03min
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 38)
6h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 25min
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 95.8 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Battery Runtime
-31%
-43%
-32%
-25%
Reader / Idle
543
353
-35%
353
-35%
418
-23%
432
-20%
H.264
313
262
-16%
233
-26%
WiFi v1.3
363
250
-31%
213
-41%
201
-45%
247
-32%
Load
145
87
-40%
66
-54%
103
-29%
115
-21%

Pros

+ 优秀的性价比
+ M.2接口支持NVMe
+ G-Sync支持
+ 雾面IPS屏幕
+ 固态硬盘+机械硬盘

Cons

- 触控版表现较差
- 不支持USB-C 3.1第二代接口
In review: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Test model courtesy of Nvidia
In review: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Test model courtesy of Nvidia

Omen系列的这台入门机型并没有搭配酷睿i7处理器,而“仅”提供了一颗酷睿 i5-6300HQ处理器。因此,消费者“仅”需要支付1300欧元(约9515人民币)的账单。不过,它搭载的这颗处理器对于大部分常见用途都能够提供充足的动力。6300HQ和GeForce GTX 1060显卡的组合可以在全高清分辨率下流畅运行目前绝大部分游戏,而用户可以使用高设定,一部分情况下甚至可以设定全开。英伟达的G-Sync技术为在75赫兹刷新率屏幕上流畅显示画面提供了支持。

SATA III固态硬盘为流畅的系统响应奠定了基础。不过在这方面它还有提升的空间。它的固态硬盘可以升级为更快的PCIe/NVMe接口硬盘。而用户也可以更换它的预装1TB硬盘。雾面的IPS屏幕提供了高亮度、高对比度和稳定的可视角度范围。

Omen 17 w100ng是惠普最新推出的一台均衡全面的入门级游戏机型。

不过这台Omen也并不完美:比如,惠普还应该在噪音控制上多下一些功夫。这台笔记本电脑的噪音有些高得离谱。它的散热系统更像是为酷睿i7-6700和GeForce GTX 1070所设计的。一个BIOS更新应该可以改善这个问题。它也没有提供Thunderbolt 3或者USB 3.1第二代接口。对于一台2016/2017年的这个价位上的机型,我们认为这应该属于标配。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HP Omen 17-w100ng - 01/18/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
76 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
72%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 74%
Weight
55 / 66 → 80%
Battery
85%
Display
87%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
90%
Temperature
89 / 95 → 94%
Noise
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Average
76%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Omen 17 (GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)