技嘉 P57X v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Gigabyte P57X v6
Brand: Gigabyte

简洁，依然搭载帕斯卡。 技嘉没有为它的P57游戏本系列新机型带来太多改变，不过这里的主角当然会是最新英伟达帕斯卡架构的横空出世。搭配GTX 1070的P57X v6有足够的吸引力让你驻足回首吗？

Steve Schardein (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/29/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P57X v6 (P57 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1645 MHz, Memory: 8000 MHz, 10.18.13.6871, Yes; Intel HD Graphics 530

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4 2133 MHz

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, 非触控, LGD0469, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Sunrise Point HM170

Storage

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB

, + 第二块硬盘 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 + LE

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 418 x 296

Battery

75.81 Wh, 6830 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2 瓦 x 2, 位于机身前方／底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.246 kg, Power Supply: 938 g

Price

1999 Euro

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 Gigabyte P57X v6 EVGA SC17 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	136.5 MB/s +79%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	75.3 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	195.2 MB/s +117%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	93.8 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -4%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	518 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	532 MBit/s +7%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	497 MBit/s


311.3 cd/m²	322.4 cd/m²	331.9 cd/m²
312.5 cd/m²	329.2 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
309.4 cd/m²	317.5 cd/m²	321.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LGD0469 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 320.9 cd/m² Minimum: 9.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 329.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1233:1 (Black: 0.267 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.72 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17.30, 1920x1080	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160	EVGA SC17 IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57W LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display		-1%	-1%	32%	33%	-3%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	68	67.4 -1%	67.6 -1%	86.9 28%	87.6 29%	66.9 -2%	66.5 -2%
sRGB Coverage	87.5	86.3 -1%	86.2 -1%	100 14%	100 14%	85.2 -3%	84.4 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	63.2 -1%	63 -2%	99.4 55%	99 55%	62.3 -3%	61.7 -4%
Response Times		-2%	-3%	-2%	-82%	1%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	33.6 ?(14, 19.6)	34.8 ?(14, 20.8) -4%	34.4 ?(14.8, 19.6) -2%	37 ?(13, 24) -10%	69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2) -107%	38 ?(14, 24) -13%	37 ?(13, 24) -10%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)	25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8) -0%	26.4 ?(4.4, 22) -3%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%	40 ?(10, 30) -56%	22 ?(4, 18) 14%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%
PWM Frequency					1000 ?(29)
Screen		2%	7%	20%	6%	8%	0%
Brightness middle	329.2	344.9 5%	351.7 7%	336 2%	394.1 20%	328 0%	286 -13%
Brightness	321	329 2%	339 6%	320 0%	368 15%	317 -1%	274 -15%
Brightness Distribution	93	86 -8%	91 -2%	88 -5%	83 -11%	88 -5%	87 -6%
Black Level *	0.267	0.349 -31%	0.37 -39%	0.25 6%	0.439 -64%	0.3 -12%	0.31 -16%
Contrast	1233	988 -20%	951 -23%	1344 9%	898 -27%	1093 -11%	923 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.93	4.49 24%	3.71 37%	3.61 39%	5.79 2%	3.74 37%	4.49 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.07	8.72 21%	8.48 23%	6.02 46%	8.44 24%	8.97 19%	7.83 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.72	4.63 31%	2.46 63%	4.78 29%	4.23 37%	2.67 60%	4.76 29%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.11 ^104%	2.29 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.41 ^91%	2.47 ^89%
CCT	7611 ^85%	6905 ^94%	6849 ^95%	6185 ^105%	7479 ^87%	6861 ^95%	6843 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	56.7 -1%	56.6 -1%	88 54%	86.6 52%	56 -2%	55 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87	86.4 -1%	86.1 -1%	100 15%	100 15%	85 -2%	84 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-0% / 1%	1% / 4%	17% / 19%	-14% / -0%	2% / 5%	-2% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points +18%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.75 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.67 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.67 Points +11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.59 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.73 Points +4%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.72 Points +4%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.46 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.4 Points -1%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points +9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	139 Points -1%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	136 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +24%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	710 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	669 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	374.4 s *
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	233.1 s * +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	229.2 s * +39%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.8 s * +40%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	636 s * -15%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	569 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	556 s * -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	553 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.5 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.44 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

67.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

635 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4952 Points +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4551 Points +8%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -3%
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	3946 Points -6%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	3441 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	5533 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	4935 Points -2%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4906 Points -2%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4129 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8531 Points +64%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	6871 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	6609 Points +27%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	4754 Points -8%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4740 Points -9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -56%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4206 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5192 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5014 points
Help

	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	EVGA SC17 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Gigabyte P57W Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		159%	220%	210%	6%
Read Seq	481.7	1559 224%	2247 366%	1718 257%	491.6 2%
Write Seq	315.4	1254 298%	1534 386%	1305 314%	391.1 24%
Read 512	303.1	850 180%	1113 267%	1250 312%	352.8 16%
Write 512	314.4	1228 291%	1490 374%	1438 357%	371.7 18%
Read 4k	25.93	49.32 90%	52.1 101%	44.42 71%	29.89 15%
Write 4k	84.6	140.3 66%	149.2 76%	154.4 83%	37.75 -55%
Read 4k QD32	273.9	539 97%	635 132%	744 172%	338.7 24%
Write 4k QD32	274.9	345.3 26%	422 54%	578 110%	278 1%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)

Sequential Read: 481.7 MB/s

Sequential Write: 315.4 MB/s

512K Read: 303.1 MB/s

512K Write: 314.4 MB/s

4K Read: 25.93 MB/s

4K Write: 84.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 273.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 274.9 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8357 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	8104 Points -3%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points -34%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4663 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4650 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	16757 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	15718 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9888 Points
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9820 Points
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7489 Points

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	23356 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	22282 Points -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	21228 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	13168 Points -44%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	12890 Points -45%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points -45%
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9713 Points -58%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	9914 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9842 Points +18%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9256 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8366 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	8175 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7795 Points -7%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		25589 points
3DMark 11 Performance		16231 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		85198 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		23781 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7559 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	123.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	90.2 fps -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.5 fps -15%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	90.2 fps -27%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	137.1 (34.5^min - 271.3^max) fps +11%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	99 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	66.8 fps -33%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	82.1 fps -17%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	69.7 fps -30%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	88.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	62.1 fps -30%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	72.4 fps -18%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	63.7 fps -28%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	101.6 (73.9^min - 128.7^max) fps +15%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	78 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	51 fps -35%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	62 fps -21%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	50 fps -36%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	117 fps +50%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	96 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	57.4 fps -40%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	71.6 fps -25%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	55.5 fps -42%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	90 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	50.6 fps -44%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	63.5 fps -29%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	85.5 fps -5%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	54.7 fps -39%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	92.8 (80^min - 103^max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	37.6 fps -58%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	104 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	82.3 fps -21%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	96.5 fps -7%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)				123.8
Metro: Last Light (2013)				99
Thief (2014)				88.5
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				78
Fallout 4 (2015)				96
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				90
Doom (2016)				104

Noise Level

Idle		33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
Load		47.5 / 52.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A)

	Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Noise		-2%	-2%	6%	4%
off / environment *	29.7	28.8 3%	31 -4%	30 -1%	30 -1%
Idle Minimum *	33.2	29.4 11%	33 1%	31 7%	32 4%
Idle Average *	33.2	32.4 2%	34 -2%	32 4%	33 1%
Idle Maximum *	33.2	48 -45%	40 -20%	33 1%	37 -11%
Load Average *	47.5	42.5 11%	44 7%	40 16%	37 22%
Load Maximum *	52.5	48.5 8%	50 5%	47 10%	47 10%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


32.6 °C	59 °C	50 °C
30.9 °C	44.4 °C	48.6 °C
25.8 °C	26.2 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 37.9 °C


44.2 °C	66 °C	37.2 °C
39.2 °C	37.6 °C	26.8 °C
25 °C	27.6 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 66 °C
Average: 36.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).

Gigabyte P57X v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	4.5 / 4.6 Watt
Idle	18.4 / 22.8 / 24 Watt
Load	175.5 / 229.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Gigabyte P57W 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Power Consumption		-5%	-28%	-12%	29%
Idle Minimum *	18.4	24.3 -32%	25 -36%	24 -30%	11 40%
Idle Average *	22.8	29.6 -30%	35 -54%	31 -36%	17 25%
Idle Maximum *	24	29.9 -25%	46 -92%	36 -50%	22 8%
Load Average *	175.5	110.1 37%	103 41%	94 46%	85 52%
Load Maximum *	229.5	171.4 25%	223 3%	204 11%	178 22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 43min

	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh	EVGA SC17 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	Gigabyte P57W 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 75.81 Wh
Battery Runtime		13%	-8%	-16%	-17%	-13%	24%
Reader / Idle	418	349 -17%	323 -23%	278 -33%	310 -26%	311 -26%	460 10%
WiFi v1.3	201	248 23%	221 10%	200 0%	206 2%	210 4%	334 66%
Load	103	136 32%	93 -10%	89 -14%	76 -26%	84 -18%	99 -4%

Pros

+ 让人目瞪口呆的显卡性能

+ 优秀的整体系统性能

+ 考虑到它的全面功能售价相当实惠

+ 屏幕提供了优秀的对比度和亮度

+ 实用的系统管理软件

+ 相比同类机型更轻更小巧

+ 易于添加第三块硬盘的设计

Cons

- 在中度负载下的发热量较大

- 触控版按键不实用

- 全塑料机身

- 屏幕仅1080p分辨率

- 噪音相对较大

尽管它和前代机型P57W如出一辙，技嘉的P57X v6仍然凭借强劲的英伟达 GeForce GTX 1070给游戏本排行榜带来了不小的冲击。在合理的1999美元（约13300人民币）价位上，它是目前最快的游戏本，可以在全高清分辨率最高设置下流畅运行最新游戏，同时通过HDMI 2.0接口可以在外接显示器上提供不错的4K游戏性能表现。

除了最新显卡之外，它的配置也同样强劲，这包括英特尔i7-6700HQ四核处理器，16GB DDR4-2133内存，256GB M.2固态硬盘和1TB 7200转传统硬盘以及1080p分辨率IPS防反光屏幕。技嘉也为它提供了易用的维护升级设计，几乎所有部件都可以打开底盖而更换。需要更高速度的用户可以自行升级NVMe固态硬盘，或者通过随机附带的转换器，取下光驱添加第三块硬盘。

P57X在控制软件上也提供了丰富的功能，如机身散热系统和显卡超频，驱动更新，以及一些其他小工具（屏幕色温控制，USB恢复盘创建工具等）。

很明显，如果你希望让一台如此强大的游戏笔记本电脑可以贴上不足2000美元的价钱，就不得不做出一些妥协。对P57X来说，这包括塑料材质的机身和较高的发热量，键盘右半部分在游戏中不管如何调整散热风扇速度都会变的很热。它的噪音也相对较大，尽管两个散热风扇都安排在了机身后部（虽然也有一些帮助）。它的功耗相比P57W更高，而电池续航（虽然对于游戏本来说重要性不大）也相对的受到了影响。最后，它的触控版十分不好用，对它感兴趣的用户请一定提前准备好外置鼠标。一些用户可能也会对它没有4K屏幕的选项感到不解，不过这并不会影响它的超高性价比。如果它可以轻松用原生分辨率应对用户交给它的所有任务的话，这当然会是个不错的事情，不过目前看来它仍然对4K分辨率有些力不从心。当然用户仍然可以外接显示器实现4K游戏。

整体上，P57X是个设计还算合理，性能强劲的游戏笔记本电脑，设计重点在功能性，便携型和高性价比。如果你的预算充足，也不怕更高的重量的话，最好还是选择其他的机型。如果不是的话，除了较差的输入设备，散热系统和缺少4K屏幕等缺点，P57X明显是一个怪兽——它将可以在原生分辨率和最高设定下轻松应对甚至是不久未来的大部分游戏。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Gigabyte P57X v6 - 2016-10-03 10/03/2016 v5.1^(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis

74 / 98 → 76%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

67%

Connectivity

68 / 81 → 84%

Weight

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Battery

73%

Display

86%

Games Performance

96%

Application Performance

91%

Temperature

81 / 95 → 85%

Noise

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

60%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Average

75%

83%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉 P57X v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Steve Schardein, 2016-09-29 (Update: 2020-06- 8)