Notebookcheck

雷蛇 灵刃(2016) FHD 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 01/02/2017
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

成功。 Razer的这款14英寸设备配备了强大的硬件,可以应对时下的所有游戏,并拥有一块哑光全高清显示屏。同时,你也将获得良好的输入模块和雷电3接口。该机型拥有不错的续航能力。

Razer Blade (2016) FHD (Blade Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, 192-Bit-Anbindung, ForceWare 376.33, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2133, 双通道, 焊接, 没有插槽
Display
14 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, Full HD, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combined, TPM 2.0
Networking
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 345 x 235
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器:165瓦特, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.88 kg, Power Supply: 418 g
Price
2700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
513 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
561 MBit/s ∼95%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼86% -10%
296
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 296 cd/m² Average: 277.1 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 272 cd/m²
Contrast: 1046:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080
Razer Blade (2016)
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), 3200x1800
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P34W v5
2560x1440
Schenker XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080
Response Times
-15%
20%
7%
-17%
10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 (14, 33)
41 (15, 26)
13%
31.6 (10.4, 21.2)
33%
41.2 (15.2, 26)
12%
56 (22, 34)
-19%
40 (15, 25)
15%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (6, 20)
37 (9, 28)
-42%
24.4 (5.2, 19.2)
6%
25.4 (3.4, 22)
2%
30 (8, 22)
-15%
25 (5, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
Screen
29%
9%
3%
1%
1%
Brightness middle
272
328
21%
288.4
6%
277.8
2%
282
4%
321
18%
Brightness
277
328
18%
282
2%
270
-3%
266
-4%
296
7%
Brightness Distribution
84
69
-18%
83
-1%
83
-1%
81
-4%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.26
0.22
15%
0.35
-35%
0.38
-46%
0.22
15%
0.33
-27%
Contrast
1046
1491
43%
824
-21%
731
-30%
1282
23%
973
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.59
1.91
58%
2.61
43%
2.71
41%
4.98
-8%
4.42
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.49
3.23
62%
7.34
14%
5.47
36%
10.2
-20%
9.78
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.28
1.69
61%
1.18
72%
2.11
51%
4.08
5%
3.34
22%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.3 96%
2.24 98%
2.19 100%
2.51 88%
2.4 92%
CCT
6848 95%
6418 101%
6506 100%
6314 103%
5877 111%
6213 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
63
15%
56.4
3%
48.5
-12%
54
-2%
55
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
97
17%
86.4
4%
76.9
-7%
83
0%
83
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 22%
15% / 11%
5% / 4%
-8% / -2%
6% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9354 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Performance

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6777
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20639
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5550
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
62.89 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
678 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points ∼68%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼68% -1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼67% -2%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼65% -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
137 Points ∼63% -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
130 Points ∼60% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼16% 0%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼16% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼16% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼15%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼15% 0%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼15% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points ∼51%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5463 Points ∼50% -2%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5460 Points ∼50% -2%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5348 Points ∼49% -4%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4937 Points ∼46% -11%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points ∼32%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20528 Points ∼31% -1%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20394 Points ∼31% -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20195 Points ∼31% -2%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼31% -3%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12873 Points ∼16%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12818 Points ∼16% 0%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3542 Points ∼73%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3459 Points ∼71% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
13058 Points ∼43%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12974 Points ∼43% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4326 Points ∼72%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4286 Points ∼71% -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
250.13 Points ∼71% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
247.33 Points ∼70%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
236.39 Points ∼67% -4%
PCMark 7 Score
5874 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4010 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4942 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4920 points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points ∼78% +4%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points ∼77% +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4920 Points ∼76%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4796 Points ∼74% -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4649 Points ∼71% -6%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4214 Points ∼65% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points ∼78% +18%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4016 Points ∼66% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4010 Points ∼66%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3706 Points ∼61% -8%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3417 Points ∼56% -15%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points ∼55% -16%
Sequential Read: 1977 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1668 MB/s
512K Read: 800.1 MB/s
512K Write: 1030 MB/s
4K Read: 58.08 MB/s
4K Write: 145.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 591.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
 
Razer Blade (2016)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P34W v5
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Schenker XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-25%
-73%
8%
-14%
-58%
Write 4k QD32
508
480
-6%
156.3
-69%
418.9
-18%
287.3
-43%
301.5
-41%
Read 4k QD32
591.9
573.4
-3%
247.4
-58%
621.7
5%
320.5
-46%
246.7
-58%
Write 4k
145.6
139.6
-4%
35.31
-76%
167.3
15%
110.3
-24%
86.25
-41%
Read 4k
58.08
42.22
-27%
17.68
-70%
53.83
-7%
43.82
-25%
25.61
-56%
Write 512
1030
603.5
-41%
246.7
-76%
1483
44%
1285
25%
407.1
-60%
Read 512
800.1
654.8
-18%
223
-72%
936.6
17%
1149
44%
335
-58%
Write Seq
1668
603.4
-64%
299
-82%
1524
-9%
1290
-23%
462.7
-72%
Read Seq
1977
1296
-34%
335.3
-83%
2269
15%
1634
-17%
462.5
-77%
3DMark 06 Standard
25367 points
3DMark 11 Performance
11616 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
78946 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21402 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9117 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4873 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3443 points
Help
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
3576 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
3396 Points ∼95%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11776 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10890 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10791 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7457 Points ∼63% -31%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points ∼63% -31%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14977 Points ∼97% +11%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13891 Points ∼90% +3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13534 Points ∼88%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9691 Points ∼63% -28%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points ∼63% -29%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.3 fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
71.4 fps ∼70% -24%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼94%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
58.1 fps ∼58% -38%
low med. high ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 347.4312.1261.9131.7fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 184.5164.6148.394fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 168.1167.8154.194fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 110.4103.379.228.6fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 85.562.852.827.8fps
The Division (2016) 184.6120.761.248.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 67.954.849.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 114.493.852.428.1fps

Emissions

Noise Level

Idle
35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Load
43 / 57 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Noise
8%
5%
7%
4%
5%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
29.1
6%
31
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
31
11%
32
9%
31.6
10%
30
14%
32
9%
Idle Average *
36
33
8%
32
11%
31.6
12%
32
11%
33
8%
Idle Maximum *
37
35
5%
33.5
9%
32.5
12%
40
-8%
34
8%
Load Average *
43
39
9%
50
-16%
46.5
-8%
47
-9%
44
-2%
Load Maximum *
57
51
11%
51.5
10%
52.5
8%
51
11%
53
7%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 53.9 °C49.2 °C54 °C 
 44.3 °C49.5 °C47.5 °C 
 39.2 °C39.9 °C38.1 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 46.2 °C
48.5 °C49.4 °C45.3 °C
46.2 °C47 °C40.5 °C
39.8 °C40.2 °C37.5 °C
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 43.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.9 °C / 103.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Heat
-2%
-22%
-11%
-27%
-24%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
52.7
2%
55.6
-3%
59.3
-10%
55
-2%
65.3
-21%
Maximum Bottom *
49.4
48.4
2%
62.4
-26%
56.5
-14%
58.7
-19%
64.4
-30%
Idle Upper Side *
28
29.3
-5%
33.2
-19%
27.8
1%
36.9
-32%
35.4
-26%
Idle Bottom *
26.8
28.4
-6%
37.2
-39%
31.8
-19%
41.7
-56%
31.6
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.834.22534.541.33130.937.3402833.95025.431.16325.927.78023.831.810023.740.71252347.616023.253.620022.355.625020.954.431519.762.140019.16250019.362.963019.664.180020.370.4100019.370.1125019.269.516002067.420001969.7250018.968.7315018.964400018.764.3500018.763.3630018.864.3800018.956.71000019551250018.950.71600018.743.4SPL31.378.8N1.543.8median 19.2median 62.9Delta1.15.636.433.736.43537.133.834.834.134.634.132.532.632.433.13231.230.63129.137.428.745.928.750.527.353.426.955.226.165.425.167.927.265.825.262.724.958.124.459.423.85923.557.523.360.923.564.323.369.523.166.823.169.123.367.123.252.523.437.236.676.72.838.9median 24.9median 592.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade (2016) FHDMSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Frequency Comparison (Checkboxes select/deselectable!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 21 Watt
Load midlight 70 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
13%
-9%
-5%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
14
9
36%
12.1
14%
12
14%
16
-14%
Idle Average *
18
14
22%
19
-6%
16
11%
19
-6%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
19.5
7%
22
-5%
23
-10%
Load Average *
70
72
-3%
106.7
-52%
90
-29%
68
3%
Load Maximum *
146
124
15%
159
-9%
170
-16%
157
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 38)
7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 59min
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 61 Wh
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-10%
-38%
-32%
-21%
Reader / Idle
760
577
-24%
392
-48%
275
-64%
315
-59%
H.264
312
235
-25%
WiFi v1.3
427
243
-43%
261
-39%
232
-46%
197
-54%
220
-48%
Load
59
78
32%
47
-20%
72
22%
87
47%

Pros

+ 坚固的铝合金外壳
+ 轻薄优雅
+ 哑光IPS屏
+ 全高清分辨率
+ 快速固态硬盘
+ 高清晰度多媒体接口2.0
+ 雷电3
+ 很不错的续航时间
+ 无闪烁

Cons

- 风扇一直运行
- 键盘刻字可以改善
- 没有以太网接口

Verdict

In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.
In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.

雷蛇将强大的性能融入到极富吸引力的超薄机身中。该设备可以应对当今所有的游戏,但与体积更大的其他竞争对手相比,帧速有点低。因为机身小,散热能力有限,所以影响了图形处理器核心的频率。这是从来没有正在安静下来的笔记本电脑——但我们没有预料到这一点。当然,这些噪音是可以接受的。快速固态硬盘保证了系统响应速度。底部面板的拆卸不存在任何问题,这款笔记本电脑的端口是面向未来的。千兆以太网端口的缺失,如有必要,可以通过USB适配器来解决。

全高清版灵刃,是一个整体性能更强的设备。

与以前测评过的灵刃对比,新版本的最大的区别是屏幕。 广角的IPS全高清屏幕,拥有适宜的亮度和良好的对比度。 优势:与QHD +屏幕的同系列笔电相比,我们无法发现,该机型全高清屏幕上的任何闪烁。 该屏幕也比QHD+触摸屏更高效,拥有更长的电池续航时间。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Razer Blade (2016) FHD - 12/25/2016 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
93 / 98 → 95%
Keyboard
76%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
61 / 81 → 75%
Weight
64 / 10-66 → 97%
Battery
85%
Display
87%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
92%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
66%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Average
78%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 雷蛇 灵刃(2016) FHD 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-01- 2 (Update: 2018-05-15)