Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G的回顾。5G智能手机提供144赫兹和骁龙888+,价格合理

没有PWM的廉价旗舰杀手? 在纸面上,Moto G200 5G看起来相当有希望。除了快速的144-Hz面板、UFS 3.1存储、LPDDR5内存和旗舰级SoC之外,Moto G200还内置108MP的三摄像头,并由5000毫安时电池供电。但是,在一个领域,摩托罗拉再次出现了不足......
5G Smartphone
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

Moto G200 5G是摩托罗拉Moto G系列的最新旗舰机型,配备了骁龙888+。该制造商还为其强大的中端智能手机配备了8GB的LPDDR5内存和128GB或256GB的内部UFS 3.1存储空间,建议零售价为450欧元(约509美元)。不过,更大的存储空间在欧洲还没有上市。

该设备的顶部是6.8英寸的LCD面板,帧率达到144赫兹。强大的高通SoC可能会引起游戏爱好者的兴趣。背面有一个108MP的主摄像头,支持8K视频录制。

Motorola Moto G200 5G (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.80 inch 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, ono52-certified, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G: NR sub-6GHz 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78, 4G: LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/43/66, 3G: UMTS 1/2/4/5/8/19, 2G: GSM 2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 168.1 x 75.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f//2.2, 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Virtual, Headset, protective cover, charger, USB type-C cable, guides, MxUX, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
202 g, Power Supply: 95 g
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护壳 - 摩托罗拉智能手机,带打孔器

摩托罗拉Moto G200的恒星蓝
摩托罗拉Moto G200的恒星蓝
摩托罗拉Moto G200的冰川绿
摩托罗拉Moto G200的冰川绿

Moto G200 5G重202克(约0,45磅),有两种颜色。恒星的缎面磨砂处理掩盖了指纹,并以蓝色和紫色的混合色显示我们的测试样品。背面和框架都是由塑料制成的,这一点很容易让人感觉到。一般来说,Moto G200 5G的做工并不差,尽管可以说其他中端代表,如 小米11 Lite 5G它的玻璃外壳,给人留下了更高质量的印象。

这款通过IP52认证的摩托罗拉智能手机有一个平坦的IPS显示屏,配备了一个 "下巴",只是对于这个价格范围来说有点太宽。但是,中上层的竞争对手也不能以显示屏和设备正面的比例更好而大放异彩。Moto智能手机的物理按键有一个非常清晰的启动点。此外,按键在其框架中很牢固,因此几乎没有移动。正如摩托罗拉其他机型的典型做法,Moto G200 5G有一个谷歌助手的专用键。

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!

连接性--Moto G200 5G与Ready For

与旗舰产品Edge-20系列类似,摩托罗拉的中端产品也支持现场Ready-For平台。由于Ready-For-PC功能,Moto G200 5G能够在更大的屏幕上显示应用程序和PC数据--为了使用这一功能,必须一次性安装一个特殊的PC软件。在无线方面,Moto G20支持Miracast,当连接到家庭网络时,可以选择使用特殊的桌面模式,或者甚至可以将Moto智能手机作为遥控器使用。

用户可以在Netflix、Amazon Prime Video和其他视频流服务上顺利观看高清视频内容,因为有Widevine L1认证。摩托G200 5G的Camera2 API 3级也是可用的。

我们的测试样本测量了128GB的内部UFS存储容量,而操作系统使用了约20GB。没有microSD插槽。外部存储设备或输入设备可以通过一个OTG适配器连接。USB-C端口支持USB 3.1速度。

对。纽扣
对。纽扣
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
左:谷歌助理按钮
左:谷歌助理按钮
底部。扬声器、麦克风、USB-C端口、SIM卡插槽
底部。扬声器、麦克风、USB-C端口、SIM卡插槽

软件 - 摩托罗拉智能手机与Android 11

我的用户体验是一个干净和优化的用户界面,并补充了谷歌的Android 。在测试中,我们使用了预装的Android 11,并在本次审查时使用了2021年12月的安全补丁。制造商正在计划未来两年的更新,所以直到2023年11月。https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/software-security-page/g_id/6806#gs=eyJndWlkZUlEIjo2ODA2LCJxdWVzdGlvbklEIjo0LCJyZXNwb25zZUlEIjo4MywiZ3VpZGVTZXNzaW9uIjoiT3V4X05HdnAiLCJzZXNzaW9uSUQiOiJPdXhfTkd2cCJ9

作为一个用户,你可以得到典型的 "Moto体验",包括捆绑的个性化字体、颜色、符号和指纹传感器动画的选项。除了Ready For功能外,MyUX UI还为摩托罗拉的硬件和软件提供安全功能,称为ThinkShield for Mobile。这是一个基于联想的ThinkShield品牌的平台,应该可以提供额外的保护,防止恶意软件、网络钓鱼和网络攻击。

用户将不得不通过一个真正的永远在线的显示器来获取通知。摩托罗拉为其中档智能手机配备了熟悉的显示预览功能,当抬起手机时,信息会被登记。然而,制造商并没有提供一个永久打开显示屏的选项。

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

通信和GNSS - 摩托罗拉5G智能手机

Moto G200 5G支持Wi-Fi 6家庭网络和快速轴标准,可选择使用6-GHz频段,在我们的测量过程中造成了快速的传输速率。 与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12相结合的传输速率在接收和发送数据方面是一致的。

说到通信,蓝牙5.2、双卡双待和5G,以及用于近场通信的NFC都在上面。在5G标准之上,这款中档智能手机总共支持23个LTE频段--包括28频段在内的所有与德国用户相关的LTE频段都被覆盖。这款Moto智能手机也适合在美国使用。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s +2%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (759min - 906max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (347min - 713max) MBit/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (809min - 863max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 9
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
727 (616min - 781max) MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s -22%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -55%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Motorola Moto G200 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (809-863)
Motorola Moto G200 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø864 (759-906)
在户外的地理定位
在户外的地理定位
在室内的地理定位
在室内的地理定位

说到地理定位,Moto G200 5G支持主要的卫星系统,如GPS(L1,L5),GLONASS和Galileo。为了确定GPS的精度,我们带着测试设备进行了一次短途旅行,并与Garmin Venu 2进行比较。在我们4公里(约2.5英里)的测试轨道结束时,智能手机的GPS模块与我们的Garmin Venu 2参考设备之间的差异达到了约180米(约590英尺)。

地理定位总体上可以做得更好。记录的部分轨道明显偏离了所选择的路线。尽管记录的轨迹有一些小的不准确,但Moto智能手机还是适合用于导航,尽管信号强度(SNR为29.5)没什么可写的。

Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
Garmin Venu 2定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G定位

电话和通话质量 - 带有VoLTE功能的Moto G200 5G

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

我们喜欢我们测试期间的通话质量。VoLTE和VoWiFi也在其中。声音被清晰地捕捉到,这也被我们在另一端的测试人员所证实。由于有双麦克风,通过Skype和扬声器进行视频通话的质量令人满意。

摩托智能手机的SAR测量值相当高,为0.94W/kg(头部)和1.48W/kg(身体)。

摄像机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机配备三摄像头

照片模式
照片模式
纵向模式
纵向模式

虽然1600万像素的前置摄像头可以为社交媒体内容拍摄可靠的自拍,但锐度可以更高。除此之外,增亮的效果也很不理想。

类似于 11T系列小米,摩托罗拉专注于主摄像头,而超广角摄像头并不能让我们信服。800万像素的分辨率相当小,细节水平不是很好,质量可以更好。无论是超广角摄像头还是主摄像头,都没有光学图像稳定功能。 小米11T智能手机评论。预算价格下的高端功能

摩托罗拉在Moto G200 5G和Edge 20 Pro上使用了三星的108MP相机传感器(S5KHM2)。 Edge 20 Pro,这解释了我们非常相似的测试图像结果。尺寸为1/1.52英寸的传感器以自然的方式捕捉动机,几乎没有过度曝光的图像,因此它们被描绘得相当流畅。使用ColorChecker护照进行的分析显示,与实际参考颜色相比,偏差相对较高。

为了在黑暗中使用小像素时仍能捕捉到大量的光线,超像素分选技术分别从9个单像素中计算出巨大的像素。超级像素 "导致在光线不好的时候有更高的灵敏度,这导致了Moto G200 5G在黑暗中的坚实亮度。然而,受苦的清晰度和缺失的OIS并不能使这款中档智能手机成为弱光专家。

摩托智能手机的主摄像头可以拍摄8k30的动画照片。想要更高的帧率的用户仍然需要在超高清分辨率(达到60FPS)下进行操作。在运行视频时,用户可以在摄像头之间进行切换,但广角镜头的光学效果仅限于FHD。另外,质量明显下降,特别是在光线不好的情况下使用。

广角镜头
广角镜头
主摄像头
2倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
微距模式
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
20 ∆E
22 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G200 5G: 14.14 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 23.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
73.8 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
81.4 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G200 5G: 45.48 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 81.42 ∆E

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G

Moto G200 5G的33瓦TurboPower充电器
Moto G200 5G的33瓦TurboPower充电器

盒子里有33瓦的TurboPower充电器、保护罩、充电器、USB-C电缆、快速入门指南和SIM工具包。用户可以通过制造商的网上商店独家购买兼容的耳机。

制造商为Moto G200 5G提供为期2年的标准保修,尽管用户可以选择用延长保险来弥补机械缺陷,再延长12个月。

可选的意外损坏保护(两年94.99欧元/108美元)为材料损坏或液体损坏提供额外的保障。

输入设备和操作 - Moto G200 5G运行起来非常流畅

144赫兹的极快刷新率是对屏幕变化或网站滚动的愉快流畅描述的原因。6.8英寸的IPS显示屏上的输入精确到触摸屏的各个角落。

电源按钮上的集成指纹传感器可以可靠而快速地解锁Moto G200 5G。显示屏从待机模式打开的时间跨度也相当快。前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能是基于简单的二维面部识别,在日常生活中可以使用,但与其他设备相比并不可靠。

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

显示屏 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的液晶显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
打孔机周围有轻微的阴影
打孔机周围有轻微的阴影

6.8英寸全高清+显示屏,也提供Max Vision,分辨率为1080 x 2460像素,长宽比为20:9。
,这导致了396PPI的像素密度。这款中档智能手机能自动适应所描述的内容的帧率,并将其控制在48和144赫兹之间,就像制造商的旗舰机一样。

虽然该面板有HDR10认证,但我们可以测量到最大亮度只有512cd/m²。即使我们的APL50测试结果为520 cd/m²,也几乎没有改变HDR内容的相对较小的亮度率。除此之外,亮度分布也不是很均匀,这在打孔区域尤其明显,那里有明显的轻微阴影。

我们在PWM(脉宽调制)期间测量了波动,当时天气相当暗,但频率很高,对用户来说应该不是问题。在更高的亮度水平上,这些波动也会消失。

0 %时的PWM
0 %时的PWM
50%时的PWM
50%时的PWM
100 %时的PWM
100 %时的PWM
491
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 519 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 487.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 512 cd/m²
Contrast: 1422:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 7154
Motorola Moto G200 5G
IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei Nova 9
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
32%
63%
34%
42%
Brightness middle
512
736
44%
889
74%
621
21%
781
53%
Brightness
488
751
54%
902
85%
632
30%
782
60%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
95
9%
96
10%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.36
Contrast
1422
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.42
2.18
36%
0.9
74%
1.7
50%
2
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.9
5.69
4%
1.9
68%
2.8
53%
2.9
51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.1
43%
1.3
65%
2.2
41%
2.3
38%
Gamma
7154 0%
2.27 97%
2.26 97%
2.17 101%
2.28 96%
CCT
1.944 334362%
6563 99%
6614 98%
6806 96%
6852 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 89290 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 89290 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 89290 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在显示设置中,用户可以调整Moto G200 5G的色温,还可以在 "饱和 "和 "自然 "两种屏幕模式中进行选择。
后者提供精确的校准,以sRGB色彩空间为目标,根据我们用CalMAN软件进行的分析,它大部分被覆盖。灰度显示deltaE为3.7,因此在很少的颜色偏差中显示出与理想范围的巨大差异。在色彩方面,Moto G200 5G的deltaE为3.4,对于一款售价450欧元(约509美元)的智能手机来说,它保持了一个坚实的水平。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外,这款摩托罗拉智能手机给人留下了坚实的印象。即使在阳光下,显示屏仍然可以识别,尽管显示内容的能见度随着阳光的增加而恶化。一旦出现反射,Moto智能手机的LCD就会达到其极限。

Moto G200 5G的可视角度在很长一段时间内是稳定的,尽管面板的感知亮度明显下降。

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

性能 - 采用高通SoC的摩托罗拉智能手机

骁龙888+由一个非常快速的内置 "Prime Core "组成,频率高达3 GHz,基于ARM Cortex-X1架构。 此外,还有三个基于Cortex A78的快速性能内核(2.42 GHz),以及四个ARM Cortex A55内核,时钟频率高达1.8 GHz。采用了Adreno 660图形单元。

在我们的基准测试结果中,与中端竞争对手相比,摩托罗拉智能手机排在第一位。该 骁龙888+并未发挥其全部潜力,这一点从 一加9 Pro采用了 骁龙888在许多CPU测试中超过了Moto G200 5G。此外,我们观察到在屏幕上,特别是在屏幕外的结果中,CPU性能明显下降。这可能会在长时间的HFR游戏过程中造成问题(见 "游戏 "段落)。
在日常工作中,Moto智能手机运行相当流畅,几乎没有任何延迟。系统性能非常好,应用程序的加载时间非常短。这也要归功于UFS存储的快速读取和写入速度。骁龙888+(理论上)支持3.1标准的全部带宽,但这个范围在Moto智能手机上无法达到。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1076 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points -7%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
790 Points -27%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points -20%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1076 - 1170, n=6)
1143 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -15%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3286 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points +2%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
3000 Points -9%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points -11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (3286 - 3675, n=6)
3572 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points -9%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6664 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2216 Points -67%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points -46%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2423 Points -64%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5078 Points -24%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4544 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (3646 - 6664, n=6)
5544 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points -36%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4865 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2359 Points -52%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points -26%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2243 Points -54%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5037 Points +4%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4604 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4158 - 4865, n=6)
4681 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points -17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
18567 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points -27%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (12136 - 18567, n=6)
15268 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points -37%
3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5765 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points -57%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points -26%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4179 Points -28%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4285 - 5895, n=6)
5536 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)
2555 Points -56%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points -56%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points -25%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4194 Points -27%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4274 - 5875, n=6)
5541 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)
6280 Points +10%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1564 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points -56%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points -22%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1291 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1161 - 1564, n=6)
1475 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=207, last 2 years)
1689 Points +8%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1453 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points -53%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points -16%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1205 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1147 - 1532, n=6)
1447 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1698 Points +17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
108 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps -41%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
60 fps -50%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
116 fps -4%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (91 - 121, n=3)
110.7 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps -30%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
161 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps -18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps +24%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
133 fps -17%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
185 fps +15%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (161 - 197, n=3)
184 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +53%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
81 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
69 fps -15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps -26%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
59 fps -27%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
106 fps +31%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (81 - 127, n=4)
102.5 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps -11%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
92 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps -16%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps +29%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
79 fps -14%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
122 fps +33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (92 - 141, n=4)
124 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +53%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
54 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps +9%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
53 fps -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
75 fps +39%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (54 - 94, n=4)
76.5 fps +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +13%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
62 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps +31%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
57 fps -8%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
79 fps +27%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (62 - 95, n=4)
83.3 fps +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +60%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
35 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps +26%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
31 fps -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
44 fps +26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (35 - 53, n=4)
45.5 fps +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +24%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps +14%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
33 fps -21%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
46 fps +10%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (42 - 62, n=4)
52.5 fps +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +43%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps -29%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps +17%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
35 fps -17%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
49 fps +17%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (42 - 65, n=6)
56.7 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)
44 fps +5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps +46%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
38 fps -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
53 fps +36%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (39 - 81, n=6)
65.2 fps +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +65%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps -42%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps 0%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
22 fps -33%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
33 fps 0%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (31 - 41, n=6)
36.5 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)
32.8 fps -1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
19 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps +16%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
14 fps -26%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21 fps +11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (19 - 30, n=6)
24.8 fps +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
794271 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
438254 Points -45%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points -14%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
467593 Points -41%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (794271 - 829929, n=3)
813105 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -7%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
695964 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
422597 Points -39%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
595585 Points -14%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
437387 Points -37%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
540464 Points -22%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
718779 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (695964 - 725649, n=3)
711522 Points +2%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
286905 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
139024 Points -52%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points -61%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
71546 Points -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (27321 - 286905, n=3)
114318 Points -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -93%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4349 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points +11%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4950 Points -13%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points -7%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (5711 - 7123, n=4)
6407 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +1%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8546 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9089 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points +17%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10816 Points +27%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points +9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (8546 - 11096, n=4)
10063 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +13%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5648 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4269 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points +36%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6372 Points +13%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points +26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (5648 - 7941, n=4)
6905 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +11%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13865 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6783 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points -8%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6726 Points -51%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points -46%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (11374 - 15524, n=4)
13894 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +3%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1665 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1359 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points 0%
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1295 Points -22%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points -4%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1665 - 1882, n=4)
1782 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -10%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (75.9 - 125.4, n=4)
98.4 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
75.9 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.1 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.8 Points -5%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
58.8 Points -23%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.8 Points -32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (108.5 - 218, n=3)
159.8 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.1 Points +9%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
117.6 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
108.5 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -4%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
102.6 Points -5%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (79.8 - 114, n=3)
91.5 runs/min +15%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
79.8 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min -32%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.2 runs/min -33%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (120 - 165, n=3)
144 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points -27%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
96 Points -35%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (28695 - 49046, n=4)
38237 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +17%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
28695 Points
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points -12%
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
23915 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303)
1893 ms * -39%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1744 ms * -28%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -17%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444 ms * -6%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
1358 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (1118 - 1443, n=4)
1267 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G200 5GSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GXiaomi Poco F3Huawei Nova 9Xiaomi 11TAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-11%
-5%
-11%
7%
20%
Sequential Read 256KB
1898
951
-50%
1378
-27%
1030
-46%
1790
-6%
1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56)
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
712
486.5
-32%
684
-4%
759
7%
942
32%
Random Read 4KB
155.9
168.2
8%
208
33%
229.6
47%
139.3
-11%
Random Write 4KB
322.5
192.5
-40%
170.6
-47%
239.2
-26%
133.3
-59%

游戏 - 限制游戏能力

这些技术要求注定了Moto G200 5G将用于Android 游戏。从纸面上看,快速的SoC和大而快的144-Hz显示屏保证了大量的游戏乐趣,但我们用我们的合作伙伴GameBench测试的游戏性能测试的结果显示,Moto G200 5G的游戏性能尚有待提高。

PUBG Mobile可以在高清状态下以60 FPS的高细节播放,同时没有任何停滞。另一方面,我们的第二个测试游戏Armajet 在性能上显示出基于热的崩溃。这款竞技场射击游戏(理论上)支持完整的144 FPS,但Moto G200 5G只能达到85 FPS。此外,在整个游戏过程中,帧率明显下降,不久后只停留在40至60FPS,考虑到中档智能手机的技术规格,这是很稀疏的。

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G200 5G; Armajet: Ø55.7 (36-85)
Motorola Moto G200 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)
Motorola Moto G200 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.5 (55-61)
Motorola Moto G200 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.6 (52-61)
Motorola Moto G200 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (34-41)

排放--Moto G200 5G不能保持低温

温度

GFXBench电池测试无法读取
GFXBench电池测试无法读取

相当高的热量发展相对不均匀地渗透到了Moto智能手机的外壳中。我们测量的最高温度仍在限制范围内。尽管由于Moto G200 5G内部的热量发展,高通SoC的性能明显下降。

Wild Life压力测试显示,随着工作负荷的增加,性能下降了约20%,这对一款手机来说是相当可靠的成绩。 骁龙888+智能手机.不过,Moto G200 5G的性能开始迅速下降。

Max. Load
 43 °C39.9 °C37.8 °C 
 43.7 °C39.9 °C37.9 °C 
 42.7 °C40.3 °C37.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
38.6 °C41.7 °C43.1 °C
36.7 °C41.4 °C46.2 °C
36.9 °C41.2 °C44 °C
Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (14.8min) % +23%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 (23.7min) % +18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (3521min) % +2%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80.4 (27.4min) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (4.14min) % +26%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 (6.98min) % +15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.2 (1002min) % +4%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 (7.1min) %
05101520253035Tooltip
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.57 (7.1-8.98)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)
Xiaomi 11T Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.58 (8.3-9.17)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.8 (27.4-34.2)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.8 (14.8-15)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
Xiaomi 11T Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø34.3 (33.3-35.2)
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测
摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G评测

演讲者

摩托罗拉智能手机提供一个单一的扬声器,与它的立体声竞争者相比,它有点安静--我们测量的最大音量只有81分贝。Moto G200 5G支持Dolby Atmos技术,以获得更好的声音深度和3D音效。此外,高通Snapdragon Sound应该为无线连接提供更可靠的选择。

我们的测量结果显示,中频和高频的效果很扎实。低音是不存在的。对于日常来说,视频和电影的扬声器质量绝对够用,但对于这个价格范围来说没有什么特别之处。

追求更好声音的用户可以求助于有线或无线扬声器。有USB端口,蓝牙5.2标准与AAC、aptX HD和aptX自适应以及LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.742.52539.2413130.933.14033.739.9503740.96330.2348021.423.810019.922.112514.628.716012.539.22009.9452509.348.33158.254.84008.556.95009.360.96309.861.380014.568100011.473.7125010.371.616009.368.320009.270.4250010.668.5315011.766.2400011.464.5500012.165.9630012.670.6800012.8711000013.572.9125001464.71600014.453.3SPL23.881.2N0.549.8median 11.4median 64.7Delta2.210.250.744.741.338.73130.635.634.4383730.125.830.831.123.523.520.331.820.34416.249.915.954.513.959.713.662.213.564.519.365.916.566.613.968.3147313.277.113.27714.271.31670.617.265.317.96618.567.819.169.319.865.319.355.720.159.228.883.61.154median 16.5median 65.337.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G200 5GSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G200 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的5,000毫安时

消耗功率

Moto G200 5G有一个5000毫安时的电池,允许以高达33瓦的功率进行有线充电。我们的测量结果显示,对于一部手机来说,稳定的耗电量是相当低的。 骁龙888+-智能手机.

Moto G型号可以在一个小时内完全充电。无线充电是不可能的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 7 / 8.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-20%
-8%
-49%
-25%
-2%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
1.2
-100%
0.76
-27%
0.96
-60%
0.78
-30%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.4
-56%
1.29
-43%
2.47
-174%
1.86
-107%
1.353 ?(0.9 - 1.75, n=4)
-50%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.7
-13%
1.45
3%
2.55
-70%
1.88
-25%
1.565 ?(1.23 - 1.78, n=4)
-4%
Load Average *
7
3.6
49%
4.6
34%
3.85
45%
3.98
43%
4.03 ?(2.76 - 7, n=4)
42%
Load Maximum *
8.4
6.9
18%
8.87
-6%
7.43
12%
8.78
-5%
7.54 ?(6.74 - 8.4, n=4)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G: Ø6.41 (2.83-8.44)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200: Ø4.27 (1.04-9.35)

Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.92 (4.23-8.2)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.29 (8.22-8.34)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.04 (0.918-1.429)
Xiaomi 11T MediaTek Dimensity 1200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.149-1.311)

电池寿命

Moto G200 5G的运行时间是在刷新率设置为144赫兹的情况下测量的。在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,摩托罗拉智能手机取得了非常好的成绩,在播放视频时,禁用的Wi-Fi模块分别为15小时和25小时。在满负荷状态下,G200 5G很快就耗尽了电量。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 55min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 49min
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Huawei Nova 9
4300 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
-12%
-28%
-3%
Reader / Idle
2695
1897
-30%
1562
-42%
2244
-17%
H.264
1501
1109
-26%
918
-39%
1450
-3%
WiFi v1.3
905
721
-20%
805
-11%
652
-28%
813
-10%
Load
229
309
35%
329
44%
267
17%

Pros

+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 快速的性能
+ 快速存储
+ 坚实的108MP摄像头
+ 快速的Wi-Fi + 5G

Cons

- 超广角摄像头
- 没有立体声扬声器
- 有缺陷的IPS面板
- 塑料外壳

结论 - 摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G是一款坚实的中上层智能手机,可能是一个有趣的选择。特别是与小米11T或三星Galaxy A52s 5G相比,这款智能手机由于采用了骁龙888+,结合纤细的MyUX表面模型,包括其Ready For功能,提供了很多性能。

凭借144-Hz面板和UFS 3.1存储,Moto G200代表了一款具有快速性能的坚实的日常智能手机。不幸的是,关于高通SoC有一些挫折,这很可能是由低效冷却造成的,最终导致在较长的HFR游戏环节中帧率下降。

尽管显示屏爱好者不会对Moto G200 5G感到兴奋,但所有其他中档智能手机的潜在买家绝对应该仔细看看这款摩托罗拉智能手机。

目前Moto-G系列的旗舰产品在功能上有所妥协。除了其竞争对手小米(Poco F3, 11T),Moto智能手机有一个塑料外壳。除此之外,寻找各种高级功能,如OIS、立体声扬声器、无线充电、高IP等级或增强触觉,都将是徒劳的。

在这个价格范围内,IPS面板肯定是一个缺点,因为除了大家熟悉的液晶显示器的缺点外,液晶显示器明显更暗。此外,我们的测量结果使我们无法为对PWM敏感的用户给出 "完全清楚 "的答案。

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G(国际版)目前的建议零售价为614美元,例如在amazon.com上。.

Motorola Moto G200 5G - 01/31/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
86%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
81 / 86 → 94%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
65%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G的回顾。5G智能手机提供144赫兹和骁龙888+,价格合理
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-02-16 (Update: 2022-02-16)