Notebookcheck

摩托罗拉Moto G60s评论。拥有50瓦快速充电和120赫兹显示屏的经济型中档智能手机

120帧的游戏...或者至少接近这个。 摩托G60s拥有120赫兹刷新率,"游戏SoC",IP等级,以及包括50瓦TurboPower快速充电的5000毫安时电池,从纸面上看似乎是一款有趣的预算中档手机。继续阅读,了解这款摩托智能手机在测试中的表现,以及它是否值得购买。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

通过Moto G60s摩托罗拉,在经济实惠的中档产品中引入了超过30瓦的快速充电。5,000毫安时的电池配备了内部的TurboPower50充电技术,其目的是使漫长的充电时间成为过去。在这方面,摩托罗拉宣传说,只需充电12分钟,就可以运行12小时。

除了快速充电标准,这款270欧元(约合316美元)的智能手机(建议零售价)配备了6.8英寸Max Vision全高清+显示屏,具有120赫兹的高刷新率和四摄像头设置。此外,Moto G60s采用了联发科Helio G95处理器,由4GB内存和128GB内部UFS存储支持。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Moto G60s (Moto G60 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.80 inch, 2480 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 1 TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast, IP52-certified
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G - 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz; 3G - 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz; 4G - FDD LTE: 2600, 2100, 1900, 1800, 1700, 900, 850, 700 MHz; TDD LTE: 2300, 2600/2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.6 x 169.6 x 75.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MP (f/​1.7, phase-comparison AF); 8 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens); 5 MP (f/​2.4, macro lens); 2 MP (f/​2.4, depth of field)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (f/​2.25)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: on-screen, USB cable, charger, My UX, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
212 g, Power Supply: 97 g
Price
270 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.9 %
09/2021
Motorola Moto G60s
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
212 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2480x1080
77.7 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
80.9 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
81.4 %
04/2021
realme 8
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.6 %
05/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
摩托罗拉Motorola G60s的冰冻薄荷色
摩托罗拉Motorola G60s的冰冻薄荷色

Moto G60s的坚固性和制造质量非常稳固--考虑到MRP,这里没有什么可批评的。摩托罗拉手机的外壳主要由塑料制成,并没有散发出任何优质的感觉,但由于其背面有纹理,所以无论如何也不会感到廉价。然而,由于非常大的IPS屏幕,Moto G60s握起来并不舒服。

摩托罗拉手机的外壳有官方IP认证,但只符合IP52标准。因此,摩托罗拉只宣传G60s具有防水设计,其目的是为防止与水的适度接触提供屏障。Moto G60s的外壳不具备防水功能,因此,它不适合潜水等活动。

在这个价格范围内,屏占比达到了86%,这要归功于冲孔切口,它相当小,而且显示屏边框相对较窄。

墨蓝色的摩托罗拉Moto G60s
墨蓝色的摩托罗拉Moto G60s
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

Size comparison

169.6 mm 75.9 mm 9.6 mm 212 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g160.6 mm 73.9 mm 8 mm 177 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g159.3 mm 73.6 mm 8.4 mm 186 g

连接性 - 带有UFS存储的Moto G60s

这款Moto智能手机的连接功能包括FM收音机、双SIM卡功能、3.5毫米插孔和Miracast。G60s的外壳底部有一个USB Type-C接口,支持USB 2.0标准,外围设备可以使用OTG适配器连接。我们的评测样本的内部UFS存储容量为128GB,但21GB已经被开箱后的系统占用。

G系列的Moto手机没有状态指示灯,也没有真正意义上的随时接收通知的功能。然而,摩托罗拉为其廉价的中档智能手机提供了熟悉的显示预览功能,当手机被抬起时,会显示通知。

箱子的右侧(按钮
箱子的右侧(按钮
箱子的底面(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风
箱子的底面(扬声器、USB端口、麦克风
箱子的左侧(卡槽
箱子的左侧(卡槽
箱子的顶部(3.5毫米插孔,麦克风
箱子的顶部(3.5毫米插孔,麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

Moto G60s的内部存储可以通过microSD卡扩展到1TB。通过我们的参考存储卡--Angelbird V60,我们仔细研究了存储卡槽的速度。虽然在CPDT基准测试中的结果,特别是连续读取的结果,处于一个非常好的水平,但在我们的JPEG复制测试中,数据速率低于平均水平,只有23MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s ∼83% +60%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22.9 MB/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s ∼42% -18%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707532.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.239.137.137.239.737.236.537.23230.931.733.731.933.529.931.930.634.830.530.631.635.727.133.232.624.331.633.431.135.829.332.234.130.232.530.832.931.636.23132.1323431.131.631.433.531.227.831.832.728.83132.131.932.131.533.332.633.530.83330.731.131.931.23035.831.331.13133.629.631.626.931.536.830.731.532.239.230.632.631.232.929.73229.536.831.333.330.53328.630.533.430.634.231.42830.434.328.331.23034.33131.330.335.532.232.128.533.13030.332.23231.230.333.332.83132.236.429.136.63333.432.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.239.137.137.239.737.236.537.23230.931.733.731.933.529.931.930.634.830.530.631.635.727.133.232.624.331.633.431.135.829.332.234.130.232.530.832.931.636.23132.1323431.131.631.433.531.227.831.832.728.83132.131.932.131.533.332.633.530.83330.731.131.931.23035.831.331.13133.629.631.626.931.536.830.731.532.239.230.632.631.232.929.73229.536.831.333.330.53328.630.533.430.634.231.42830.434.328.331.23034.33131.330.335.532.232.128.533.13030.332.23231.230.333.332.83132.236.429.136.63333.460.176.276.876.776.275.677.376.577.477.276.67677.377.476.176.676.776.477.175.577.476.977.275.976.277.57775.177.276.776.977.277.375.877.476.977.175.577.477.576.976.976.576.476.677.776.976.277.676.576.575.977.176.276.776.576.576.575.777.975.977.776.17776.576.674.578.378.176.276.676.875.678.57676.277.876.276.676.277.676.876.376.277.676.476.675.377.476.876.376.876.176.277.276.776.776.275.777.577.376787676.276.377.876.676.777.776.276.676.476.776.576.677.67776.376.277.376.876.675.976.174.572.376.9849.549.154.554.661.454.956.162.262.361.561.86258.35962.462.258.961.761.155.357.846.445.948.346.449.758.457.855.656.858.657.758.458.558.556.7585655.356.158.458.457.359.359.458.757.859.359.15958.759.558.857.358.359.659.358.8595957.258.158.958.358.857.758.958.95958.752.358.958.5595958.758.658.958.359.254.35959.158.959.358.958.95959.15958.959.158.958.159.156.958.858.457.959.458.757.758.959.25958.759.259.159.458.858.657.134.634.634.93535.118.337.135.335.235.435.435.135.635.637.2Tooltip
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø23.2 (10.1-38)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø32.2 (24.3-39.7)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø76.5 (60.1-78.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø54.7 (8-62.4)

软件 - 摩托罗拉手机与Android 11

摩托罗拉在Moto G60s上安装了一个 "未经修改的版本 "Android 11,该版本带有2021年7月级别的安全补丁。在此基础上,制造商用My UX增强了用户界面,使熟悉的Moto体验可用,包括激活手电筒的手势或定制设计的选项。第三方应用程序也基本没有,除了Facebook之外,只安装了谷歌应用程序和制造商的内部应用程序。

除了极简的用户界面,摩托罗拉为其Moto手机配备了名为 "ThinkShield for Mobile "的硬件和软件安全功能。这是一个基于联想ThinkShield品牌的平台,它的目的是提供特殊保护,防止恶意软件、网络钓鱼和网络攻击。

摩托G60s中的Camera2 API有3级功能,由于DRM Widevine L1的存在,你可以以高清质量观看流媒体内容。

摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

通信和GNSS - 带有Wi-Fi 5的Moto G60s

在无线局域网方面,这款中档手机提供了Wi-Fi 5的坚实配置。尽管这在国内网络中不能提供高传输率,但G60s在与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12的组合中表现稳定,与这个价格范围内的其他智能手机相当。至于额外的通信模块,摩托罗拉还实现了一个用于近场通信的NFC芯片以及蓝牙5.0。

由于内置的MediaTek SoC,不支持5G标准,Moto G60s的芯片组只集成了一个用于移动互联网接入的LTE调制解调器。这涵盖了总共12个LTE频段和所有与德国有关的LTE频率,包括LTE 20和28频段。然而,去美国等外国旅行,在这方面可能是个问题(不支持13和25频段)。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
453 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (334min - 351max) MBit/s ∼77%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (317min - 353max) MBit/s ∼76% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (267min - 353max) MBit/s ∼76% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s ∼62% -18%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s ∼55% -28%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
448 MBit/s ∼100% +37%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
335 (281min - 350max) MBit/s ∼75% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
328 (255min - 340max) MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
327 (260min - 333max) MBit/s ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s ∼71% -2%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s ∼62% -16%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340260325328332331325329323332330327333326330330326327329332328329324324332324328331329330331260325328332331325329323332330327333326330330326327329332328329324324332324328331329330331334349347351345350345349347347348347349347349343349344350344347348347350345350346350346347Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (260-333)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (334-351)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

位置是利用GPS(L1)、GLONASS和Galileo卫星系统以及SBAS确定的。在室外可以迅速获得卫星信号,精确度约为两米。即使在室内,Moto G60s也能非常迅速地确定其位置。

为了能够在实践中评估我们的测试设备的定位精度,我们与Garmin Edge 520 GPS自行车电脑平行追踪一条路线,以进行比较。

偏差相对较小,结果是在将近15公里的测试路线结束时,中档手机和导航设备之间只有约30米的差异。详细的GPS日志也令人印象深刻,定位精度与Garmin设备相似。

定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Garmin Edge 520
定位 - Moto G60s
定位 - Moto G60s
定位 - Moto G60s
定位 - Moto G60s
定位 - Moto G60s
定位 - Moto G60s

电话和通话质量 - 带有VoLTE的摩托罗拉智能手机

摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

就Moto G60s的通话质量而言,没有太多可抱怨的地方。语音再现清晰,电话另一端的人也说我们的声音很清楚。在测试中,使用内置前置摄像头和扬声器的Skype视频通话顺利进行。

由于有Wi-Fi通话功能,当移动接收受到限制时,Moto手机可以通过WLAN网络进行通话。此外,由于有VoLTE功能,可以通过LTE网络进行通话。

摄像头 - 摩托G60s配备四摄像头设置

用Moto G60s的前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用Moto G60s的前置摄像头拍摄的照片

摩托罗拉为其中档机型配备了背面的四摄像头设置,其中主传感器的分辨率为64MP。摩托罗拉还没有透露所选择的传感器。最有可能的是,这里使用了来自三星的GW1传感器,正如其他摩托罗拉手机

高分辨率的64MP主传感器拍摄的照片质量尚可,但由于清晰度相对较低,细节有些局限--不仅是在边缘。在入射阳光下,曝光也不是100%准确。四像素技术确保了在光线较弱时的稳固照明,考虑到我们正在谈论的是一款中档手机,这导致了黑暗中的主体具有良好的图像清晰度。

除了主摄像头外,G60s还采用了微距视觉镜头,以及深度传感器和超广角摄像头。118°的广角镜头,大致类似于人眼的视野,在质量方面显然要差一些--边缘的模糊很明显,低光质量很差。特别是与主摄像头相比,照片的动态范围明显下降。总的来说,使用这支镜头拍摄的照片看起来也相当酷。

虽然1600万像素的前置摄像头的结构有些软化,但Moto G60s在白天仍能进行漂亮的自拍。人像模式下的虚化效果也实现得相当好。在这个价格范围内,通常只能用自拍相机录制全高清视频。

摩托罗拉打算在视频方面将自己与中端竞争者区分开来,比如双拍模式,主摄像头和前置摄像头可以同时录制视频。然而,除了软件之外,64MP镜头只有30帧/秒的UHD选项(3840x2160);即使在1080p下也不支持60帧/秒。在录制时,在广角和超广角镜头之间切换也是不可能的。

超广角
超广角
主摄像头
3倍变焦
5倍变焦
8倍变焦(最大
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraWide-angle cameraLow-light

我们在受控的照明条件下对64MP后置摄像头进行进一步测试。我们使用ColorChecker Passport来分析色彩表现与实际参考色彩的对比。我们在完全的演播室照明和1勒克斯的灯光强度下各测量一次。

使用ColorChecker Passport进行的分析显示,对于一款价格低廉的中档手机来说,与实际参考颜色相比,存在平均偏差。尤其是深色的颜色显示得明显更亮。白平衡也可以做得更好。在我们的测试图表中,尤其是在周边地区,图像的清晰度不是很明显。

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G60s: 8.47 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 14.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
35 ∆E
74.8 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
85.7 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G60s: 45.51 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 85.68 ∆E

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉手机与50瓦的充电器

摩托罗拉Moto G60s附带50瓦的充电器
摩托罗拉Moto G60s附带50瓦的充电器

除了Moto智能手机本身,盒子里还包括一个带有额外USB-A端口的模块化50瓦电源适配器和一条USB电缆。G60s不包括一个保护套。

摩托罗拉在德国为Moto G智能手机提供了24个月的保修

输入设备和处理方式 - 带有FaceUnlock的摩托罗拉智能手机

与其他Moto手机

,在Moto G60s上可以通过设备侧面的一个特殊按钮启动谷歌助手进行语音控制。其他内置按钮也很容易使用,它们牢牢地坐在框架中,其压力点令人愉快地牢固。电容式多点触控屏对输入做出了准确的反应。

背面有一个经典的指纹扫描仪,用于生物识别安全。虽然显示屏需要一秒钟来解锁,但在可靠性方面没有批评的余地。还提供了脸部解锁功能。二维人脸识别的安全性较低,而且往往不是特别快。

摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

显示器 - 摩托G60s,120赫兹

子像素网格
子像素网格
摩托G60s的显示屏上有阴影
摩托G60s的显示屏上有阴影

6.8英寸120赫兹LC显示屏的分辨率为2480x1080像素,这使得像素密度略低于400PPI。Moto G60s的IPS面板的亮度分布相对不均匀。特别是在显示屏的上边缘和打孔的区域,可以看到明显的阴影形成。

摩托罗拉为G60s指定了HDR-10认证,但是HDR内容的更高动态范围在相对昏暗的IPS面板上不太可能被注意到,即使是受过训练的眼睛也是如此--亮度太低了,尽管与中端竞争产品相比,它处于一个良好的水平。我们在纯白显示背景下测得的最大亮度为602cd/m²。

此外,我们在测试中以均匀分布的暗区与亮区的比例(APL50)考察面板的亮度。我们在这里确定了类似的最大亮度为610 cd/m²。

592
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 602 cd/m² Average: 564.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1075:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
Motorola Moto G60s
IPS, 2480x1080, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
realme 8
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
-88%
14%
-11%
-20%
Brightness middle
602
349
-42%
706
17%
590
-2%
606
1%
Brightness
564
352
-38%
701
24%
607
8%
606
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
92
11%
98
18%
92
11%
98
18%
Black Level *
0.56
Contrast
1075
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.23
5.87
-163%
2.1
6%
2.64
-18%
3.6
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.99
15.51
-289%
4.9
-23%
6.85
-72%
6.2
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.7
-4%
1.5
42%
2.4
8%
3.3
-27%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.07 106%
2.29 96%
2.265 97%
2.31 95%
CCT
7127 91%
6970 93%
6447 101%
6913 94%
6704 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

与我们选择的采用OLED显示屏的竞争对手相比,Moto G60s的LC显示屏有明显的对比度劣势。黑色水平与最大亮度的比例约为1:1000,即使对LC面板来说也是平均水平。

另一方面,用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的分析显示,使用默认的色彩配置文件,与sRGB色彩空间的平均deltaE偏差很低,分别为2.2(色彩)和2.3(灰度)。此外,我们在这种 "自然 "模式下测得的色温约为7,100K,比理想值6,500K更冷。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和的)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和的)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,色彩配置文件:饱和)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

尽管对比度较低,但由于其相对较好的亮度水平,Moto G60s即使在晴朗的天气下也能以坚实的可读性给人留下深刻印象。然而,一旦显示屏上出现反光,内容的阅读就会出现困难。

摩托G60s评测
摩托G60s评测
摩托G60s评测

视角很好,即使在非常平坦的视角下,屏幕内容也能相对准确地显示颜色。没有色差,但从侧面看时,面板明显变暗。

摩托G60s评测

性能 - 采用联发科SoC的Moto G60s

联发科Helio G95是一个采用12纳米工艺制造的SoC,由于GPU和显示屏之间的低延迟,它特别针对游戏玩家。该芯片组集成了两个运行速度高达2.05GHz的Cortex-A76内核,以及六个时钟速度为2GHz的小型Cortex-A55内核。Mali-G76 MP4

被集成为图形单元。

在日常使用中,系统速度令人欣喜,结合仅有的4GB内存和120赫兹的显示屏,它提供了一个基本流畅的体验--在多任务处理时,仍不时可见轻微的微卡顿现象。

在我们的基准测试包中,Moto手机提供了一个体面的性能,但与Poco F3在newegg价格从395美元左右开始 )相比,性能差距明显。realme 8中的Helio G95realme 8,结果也稍好一些;特别是在图形基准测试中,G60s的表现超过了它,但Moto智能手机的表现仍与中档竞争者相当。另一方面,浏览器基准测试成绩非常好。UFS 2.1存储系统的表现也与我们使用相同2.1标准的对比设备相当。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
522 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points ∼36% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points ∼51% -3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
532 Points ∼53% +2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points ∼31% -42%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼100% +91%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (506 - 532, n=5)
515 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=249, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼60% +14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1653 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1370 Points ∼41% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points ∼50% +2%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1689 Points ∼50% +2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points ∼37% -25%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1622 - 1689, n=5)
1665 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=249, last 2 years)
2028 Points ∼60% +23%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2055 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1145 Points ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼63% +10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2400 Points ∼67% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2055 - 2400, n=4)
2209 Points ∼62% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=146, last 2 years)
2188 Points ∼61% +6%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1943 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1132 Points ∼31% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points ∼62% +16%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2314 Points ∼64% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points ∼10% -81%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1943 - 2314, n=5)
2194 Points ∼61% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=148, last 2 years)
2273 Points ∼63% +17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
8732 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6570 Points ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points ∼61% -6%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10373 Points ∼76% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points ∼56% -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (8236 - 10373, n=3)
9114 Points ∼67% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=68, last 2 years)
9959 Points ∼73% +14%
3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1373 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
679 Points ∼16% -51%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼35% +9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points ∼9% -72%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼100% +212%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1373 - 1493, n=2)
1433 Points ∼33% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=113, last 2 years)
2968 Points ∼69% +116%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1352 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
174 Points ∼4% -87%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1502 Points ∼35% +11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼100% +216%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1352 - 1502, n=2)
1427 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=109, last 2 years)
3100 Points ∼73% +129%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
387 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
686 Points ∼56% +77%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points ∼9% -72%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼100% +216%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
387 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=61, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼78% +146%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
381 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
173 Points ∼14% -55%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼100% +221%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
381 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=58, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼76% +144%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
68 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
59 fps ∼83% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps ∼85% -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (45 - 68, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
61.7 fps ∼87% -9%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
78 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
44 fps ∼22% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps ∼43% +9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼18% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (78 - 85, n=3)
81.3 fps ∼41% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=204, last 2 years)
117 fps ∼59% +50%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
42 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼82% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼32% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (42 - 49, n=3)
44.3 fps ∼74% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps ∼82% +17%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
43 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼20% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps ∼44% +21%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼16% -56%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼100% +177%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (43 - 52, n=3)
49 fps ∼41% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=203, last 2 years)
68.1 fps ∼57% +58%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
26 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
30 fps ∼51% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼53% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼22% -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +127%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (26 - 31, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼49% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=201, last 2 years)
38.3 fps ∼65% +47%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
29 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼19% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps ∼40% +10%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼16% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼100% +179%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (29 - 33, n=3)
31.3 fps ∼39% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=201, last 2 years)
46.8 fps ∼58% +61%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼36% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼41% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps ∼16% -53%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +193%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (15 - 18, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼38% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=200, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼55% +61%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
18 fps ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.3 fps ∼19% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼40% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps ∼15% -61%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +167%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=200, last 2 years)
28.2 fps ∼59% +57%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼35% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼39% +19%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼39% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps ∼17% -48%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼100% +206%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (16 - 19, n=5)
18.2 fps ∼37% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼49% +51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼16% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps ∼35% +5%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼37% +11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps ∼14% -57%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (19 - 21, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼36% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
28.4 fps ∼50% +49%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps ∼29% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼36% +20%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps ∼15% -51%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +230%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (10 - 12, n=5)
11.4 fps ∼35% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
16.2 fps ∼49% +62%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼15% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps ∼34% +9%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼35% +13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼13% -59%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +224%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6.8 - 7.8, n=5)
7.48 fps ∼34% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼50% +62%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12983 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7242 Points ∼6% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points ∼5% -53%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points ∼14% +22%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼100% +761%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6118 - 12983, n=3)
10500 Points ∼9% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=78, last 2 years)
69094 Points ∼62% +432%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3052 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2346 Points ∼37% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points ∼25% -49%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points ∼35% -26%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1566 - 3182, n=3)
2600 Points ∼41% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 7123, n=189, last 2 years)
3806 Points ∼60% +25%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4932 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5353 Points ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points ∼21% -58%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points ∼49% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2083 - 5564, n=3)
4193 Points ∼42% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=189, last 2 years)
6883 Points ∼69% +40%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4108 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2843 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points ∼13% -75%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼100% +87%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1012 - 4108, n=3)
2959 Points ∼38% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=189, last 2 years)
4527 Points ∼59% +10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3603 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points ∼14% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points ∼25% -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points ∼14% -49%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼100% +255%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3178 - 3807, n=3)
3529 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=189, last 2 years)
5945 Points ∼46% +65%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1188 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1099 Points ∼66% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points ∼54% -24%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼65% -9%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (898 - 1288, n=3)
1125 Points ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=189, last 2 years)
1302 Points ∼79% +10%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
5923 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3400 Points ∼26% -43%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12855 Points ∼100% +117%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
5923 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 27949, n=38, last 2 years)
9511 Points ∼74% +61%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=177, last 2 years)
52.7 Points ∼100% +43%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
36.789 Points ∼70%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 40.4, n=4)
32.8 Points ∼62% -11%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.187 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
31.568 Points ∼60% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.922 Points ∼32% -54%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
95.6 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
72.362 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 72.4, n=3)
56.6 Points ∼59% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
55.877 Points ∼58% -23%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.837 Points ∼50% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.662 Points ∼28% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
52.2 runs/min ∼100% +54%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
33.8 runs/min ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)
29.1 runs/min ∼56% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=3)
27.6 runs/min ∼53% -18%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min ∼28% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
80.9 Points ∼100% +42%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points ∼73% +4%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
57 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
51 Points ∼63% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=4)
46.8 Points ∼58% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points ∼35% -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=201, last 2 years)
18720 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
16289 Points ∼87%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=3)
12304 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
11313 Points ∼60% -31%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points ∼48% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points ∼26% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797.4 ms * ∼100% -304%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=4)
5037 ms * ∼47% -88%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4321.8 ms * ∼40% -62%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=203, last 2 years)
3764 ms * ∼35% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
3349.4 ms * ∼31% -25%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
2673.4 ms * ∼25%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G60sSamsung Galaxy A22 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 10Srealme 8Oppo A74Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
16%
4%
9%
24%
39%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.53
297.7
-40%
498.76
0%
526.2
6%
514.5
3%
772 ?(427 - 999, n=89)
55%
807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
62%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.54
183
-9%
371.98
85%
187.8
-6%
255.34
27%
267 ?(13.6 - 707, n=89)
33%
365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
82%
Random Read 4KB
123.34
101.2
-18%
110.47
-10%
144
17%
139.45
13%
147 ?(92.6 - 239, n=89)
19%
142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
15%
Random Write 4KB
135.34
66.9
-51%
120.97
-11%
133
-2%
126.39
-7%
122 ?(18.2 - 290, n=89)
-10%
132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-2%

游戏--配备Mali-G76的摩托罗拉智能手机

通过Moto G60s,摩托罗拉为游戏玩家提供了一个良好的整体包装,尽管是中档价格。伴随着120赫兹的大面板,Moto手机有足够的能力来获得超过60帧的游戏体验--至少在简单的游戏中是这样。我们与我们的合作伙伴GameBench ,仔细观察了几个Android 。

这家美国制造商为《PUBG Mobile》设定了40帧的限制,在使用高清图形设置时只能达到30帧--在进行我们的审查时,UHD模式是无法选择的。在理论上支持高达144帧的Armajet中,我们最多能达到116帧。然而,我们平均 "只 "得到85帧/秒。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
01020304050607080901001101081169380899511511110010192967187959083807585798181907673818787768510010094849596107948375979885738077869389919380908478745651648884798278958884918787808684847280747577798910096918794868371575451658376848484859090898588838485869085888990827271849594104888388876861768278689185838474888696104911081169380899511511110010192967187959083807585798181907673818787768510010094849596107948375979885738077869389919380908478745651648884798278958884918787808684847280747577798910096918794868371575451658376848484859090898588838485869085888990827271849594104888388876861768278689185838474888696104914041384040404040404039413940393933413940394040403940404040404038414039404040404039403940404140403940404037413940403940394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039403940404040404040404040404040403941404040404040404040403941383940404010811693808995115111100101929671879590838075857981819076738187877685100100948495961079483759798857380778693899193809084787456516488847982789588849187878086848472807475777989100969187948683715754516583768484848590908985888384858690858889908272718495941048883888768617682786891858384748886961049140413840404040404040394139403939334139403940404039404040404040384140394040404040394039404041404039404040374139404039403940404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394039404040404040404040404040404039414040404040404040404039413839404040303030303030303030303030293030303030292930303030292930303029302930303030293028313030303030303029312930303030303030303030313029312930303030303029312930312930302930303030303030293130303030302931292929313030293031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930303030303030293130303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø84.9 (51-116)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.8 (33-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放--摩托罗拉手机保持冷静

温度

GFXBench应用程序的电池测试
GFXBench应用程序的电池测试

在长时间的负载下,机箱后部的发热在一个适度的范围内--Moto G60s在测试中从未真正发热。我们使用GFXBench应用程序的电池测试来检查内部的热量发展。在这里,各场景连续运行30次,并记录电池状态和帧率。

虽然性能随着时间的推移不断下降,但我们仍然无法检测到帧率的明显下降,损失约为20%。在3DMark基准测试的压力测试中,Moto G60s的稳定性也非常好。

摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
0123456788.098.18.148.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.17.657.637.567.527.527.487.337.374.134.144.164.154.164.154.164.174.164.164.164.154.154.144.144.164.154.164.164.148.098.18.148.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.17.657.637.567.527.527.487.337.374.134.144.164.154.164.154.164.174.164.164.164.154.154.144.144.164.154.164.164.142.312.322.322.332.332.322.332.332.312.322.322.322.312.332.322.312.312.322.322.321.0461.0371.0411.0551.0431.0541.0521.0571.0561.0581.0591.0551.0581.0421.0471.0541.0541.0561.0561.055Tooltip
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.89 (7.33-8.16)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.15 (4.13-4.17)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.32 (2.31-2.33)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø1.052 (1.037-1.059)
Max. Load
 38.1 °C35.1 °C33.7 °C 
 38.2 °C35.2 °C34 °C 
 37.3 °C34.9 °C33.7 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
32.6 °C34.7 °C35.1 °C
32 °C35.3 °C36.9 °C
32.9 °C36 °C36.4 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测
摩托罗拉Moto G60s评测

演讲者

摩托G60s的底部只有一个扬声器。它的音质还可以,但小米11 Lite 4G

,在这个价格范围内也提供了声音好的立体声扬声器。不出所料,Moto G60s的声音模式中没有低音存在,但超高音调也受到严重影响。

使用摩托罗拉手机,你不需要没有音频插孔。音频输出的声音很悦耳,也很微妙。无线耳机可以通过蓝牙5.0连接。这款中档手机支持以下BT编解码。AAC、aptX、aptX HD和aptX adaptive以及LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2050.739.22541.335.3313128.44035.635.4503836.56330.128.28030.831.410023.523.312520.322.216020.334.220016.243.525015.951.531513.958.640013.661.750013.563.463019.364.580016.567.6100013.97412501474.4160013.270.3200013.271.2250014.270.331501672.5400017.271.6500017.972.1630018.564.7800019.168.51000019.869.41250019.371.11600020.156.3SPL28.882.9N1.154.9median 16.5median 67.6Delta2.99.545.642.240.236.233.427.231.2303533.727.525.220.12019.619.217.220.915.931.712.440.11247.410.251.510.155.18.758.215.260.716.362.515.667.913.169.211.17011.57111.769.814.171.414.464.517.764.216.567.416.769.218.165.517.554.118.852.227.180.10.845.2median 15.2median 62.52.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G60sSamsung Galaxy A22 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G60s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--配备5000毫安时的Moto G60s

能源消耗

一个5000毫安时的锂聚合物电池提供能量。当它完全耗尽时,用附带的50瓦电源适配器几乎正好可以在57分钟内完成充电。在功耗方面,Moto G60s被证明是具有6.8英寸IPS面板的120 Hz智能手机的典范。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.9 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 4.3 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G60s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
realme 8
5000 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-60%
-12%
-15%
-58%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.5
-114%
0.69
1%
0.62
11%
1.297 ?(0.69 - 2.5, n=3)
-85%
0.953 ?(0.37 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
-36%
Idle Average *
0.9
2.1
-133%
1.46
-62%
1.59
-77%
1.987 ?(0.9 - 3.6, n=3)
-121%
1.806 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
-101%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
2.5
-108%
1.5
-25%
1.63
-36%
2.13 ?(1.2 - 3.7, n=3)
-78%
2.04 ?(0.69 - 4.2, n=217, last 2 years)
-70%
Load Average *
4.3
2.9
33%
3.67
15%
4.05
6%
4.32 ?(3.67 - 5, n=3)
-0%
4.48 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
-4%
Load Maximum *
6.4
4.9
23%
5.58
13%
5.2
19%
6.79 ?(5.58 - 8.4, n=3)
-6%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456782.192.162.052.052.161.982.212.082.241.5260.8022.262.250.7790.7121.8461.8731.8251.7781.7432.441.1912.852.450.9861.1182.430.7222.340.7061.6632.21.7360.8891.1160.6812.222.322.181.0662.592.220.7322.122.092.312.12.132.122.282.12.172.222.090.7282.072.340.890.7553.653.873.83.723.753.731.1823.630.8270.8532.340.7782.292.322.250.8140.7452.431.0482.412.522.522.422.440.8222.320.9972.283.122.292.692.272.312.12.452.482.281.0151.0752.092.272.372.522.492.560.7060.7574.980.9624.564.564.324.654.494.414.294.624.624.464.234.674.554.484.114.834.54.594.071.0683.035.14.824.14.843.930.7272.382.224.835.264.654.744.724.944.694.924.781.31823.964.620.7993.353.382.652.792.812.862.892.712.992.740.7285.375.046.1766.120.8564.740.8675.055.024.255.054.674.864.640.7064.345.66.420.8744.484.84.670.7911.9144.594.744.512.780.7697.027.013.740.7584.684.354.970.9781.7285.335.633.874.756.114.074.660.8324.625.194.874.835.411.0682.626.464.087.165.657.145.795.966.195.6150.7934.756.270.776.917.356.846.115.055.757.167.046.245.355.345.886.485.194.853.648.136.645.857.034.26.556.456.796.775.52.810.7531.21.11.6871.6872.122.22.224.554.644.724.744.694.584.094.64.64.434.884.642.162.16.152.950.7650.840.7841.0912.593.033.013.093.063.083.113.193.023.023.7932.922.932.313.063.423.332.872.172.842.822.822.982.842.942.783.583.213.333.23.342.252.562.62.63.263.242.233.153.212.33.022.282.473.273.093.442.482.713.463.232.163.093.143.123.123.313.043.082.31.9872.0222.131.9812.072.312.030.9673.483.614.322.841.7723.263.253.713.374.053.313.353.343.323.333.423.223.453.31.563.042.431.7212.632.652.692.571.5852.442.742.421.8062.872.712.642.452.733.321.5061.7252.571.5562.632.862.852.672.883.2432.762.842.572.772.982.622.712.991.6092.642.332.62.522.242.422.542.212.341.5462.181.5671.5284.384.34.24.124.614.524.564.34.143.674.74.444.294.113.294.434.634.593.943.214.394.774.264.243.132.064.835.725.354.415.261.5292.72.652.534.084.344.364.213.874.114.154.194.434.314.13.471.5485.24.975.071.6094.594.944.812.135.895.514.795.434.736.031.5984.661.4855.063.925.225.024.094.965.162.864.576.115.464.696.031.5764.414.34.564.532.134.95.215.785.175.372.181.8766.856.773.813.493.251.9875.224.675.235.382.085.674.625.774.275.045.445.94.395.14.361.7114.744.14.344.983.794.241.595.836.665.015.76.855.156.256.044.966.196.514.836.425.863.671.6335.915.961.5895.246.6777.646.456.375.495.416.96.386.165.416.395.196.266.376.426.825.955.992.815.886.486.6275.786.085.792.756.626.326.456.456.356.265.181.5862.572.271.9391.7772.353.144.214.494.224.024.334.433.424.254.434.74.074.234.264.264.164.614.292.462.835.315.112.021.6081.4361.6193.612.912.521.8281.838Tooltip
Motorola Moto G60s Mediatek Helio G95: Ø3.35 (0.681-8.13)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80: Ø3.8 (0.967-7.64)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123454.214.234.234.034.234.284.174.284.184.294.244.164.274.44.554.664.224.354.354.544.624.44.464.424.534.394.424.524.444.394.294.544.64.284.514.434.424.434.14.084.24.264.244.324.524.374.34.394.424.544.374.364.364.444.354.234.214.364.362.752.742.962.772.922.752.762.772.772.772.772.762.672.722.853.432.792.792.842.822.812.792.762.82.795.273.712.992.822.92.913.052.812.762.72.82.773.32.792.842.792.753.422.82.782.882.792.83.62.852.852.872.842.873.372.892.943.012.852.92.322.574.214.234.234.034.234.284.174.284.184.294.244.164.274.44.554.664.224.354.354.544.624.44.464.424.534.394.424.524.444.394.294.544.64.284.514.434.424.434.14.084.24.264.244.324.524.374.34.394.424.544.374.364.364.444.354.234.214.364.362.752.742.962.772.922.752.762.772.772.772.772.762.672.722.853.432.792.792.842.822.812.792.762.82.795.273.712.992.822.92.913.052.812.762.72.82.773.32.792.842.792.753.422.82.782.882.792.83.62.852.852.872.842.873.372.892.943.012.852.92.322.571.0010.9110.9321.10.8480.8110.9570.9540.9890.8080.8710.8550.9260.8260.730.8130.920.8170.7940.8161.0540.8260.8060.8441.051.0270.790.910.9210.7570.7660.8021.0990.7740.9390.781.0010.8650.8470.8850.990.7851.0160.9861.1220.8340.7820.7470.9470.8460.9530.7661.0540.7990.8880.7610.830.8850.780.7870.8382.492.372.332.322.362.342.332.312.252.272.292.22.242.242.192.192.152.272.182.132.222.132.152.112.292.12.112.162.152.132.162.132.182.062.112.092.112.112.072.052.12.12.142.122.12.092.062.042.082.072.122.092.072.041.9812.252.01