Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G42智能手机评论。700尼特的OLED轻量级,价格便宜

负担得起的好。 摩托罗拉Moto G42是不可能被打败的,至少从中档对手的角度来看是这样。这款6.4英寸的智能手机拥有明亮的OLED面板,5000毫安时的电池和5000万像素的摄像头,提供了很多功能,但它的售价只有不到200欧元(约205美元)。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
摩托罗拉Moto G42

在智能手机的中端产品中,有很多设备以其良好的性价比给人留下深刻印象。这正是使摩托罗拉Moto G42脱颖而出的原因。尽管其建议零售价为250欧元(约合255美元),但这款6.4英寸的Android 设备拥有令人惊讶的广泛功能。存储容量较小的64GB而不是128GB的变体只需200多欧元(约204美元)。

摩托G42,像它的摩托G41前辈一样,有一个明亮的AMOLED显示屏,这在中端产品中不一定是个问题。该骁龙680 4G在引擎盖下工作,伴随着高达6GB的内存和最大128GB的存储。该机还配备了5千万像素摄像头和5,000毫安时电池。

Motorola Moto G42 (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD , glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer (compass), DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), LTE Cat. 13 DL/Cat. 5 UL, head SAR 0.58 W/kg, body SAR 1.12 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 160.6 x 73.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Triple: 50 MP main camera (f/1.8, 0.64 µm, PDAF); 8 MP ultra-wide angle camera (f/2.2, 1.12 µm); 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.2, 1.0 µm, videos up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 20-watt charger, USB Type-C cable, guides, SIM tool, protective case, 24 Months Warranty, IP52 rating, Dolby Atmos, fanless
Weight
175 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.6 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G42
SD 680, Adreno 610
175 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.4 %
04/2022
Motorola Moto G41
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
178 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
77.7 %
06/2022
Oppo A76
SD 680, Adreno 610
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
79.8 %
05/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

外壳 - 轻便而时尚的塑料底盘

Moto G42有 "金属玫瑰色 "和 "大西洋绿色 "两种颜色,由于其良好的制造质量和微妙的光泽塑料表面而具有吸引力。这些不仅看起来很时尚,而且还为手指提供了轻微的阻力,这使得在不使用附带的保护壳的情况下,可以相对安全地握住智能手机。此外,后盖也不太容易沾染指纹。IP52认证确保了Moto G42可以防止灰尘和水的飞溅。

塑料底盘使Moto G42的重量令人愉快。这款6.4英寸的手机仅重175克。与Moto G41相比,三摄像头离机身远了几毫米。 摩托G41这使得智能手机在平面上更容易晃动。Moto G42不再有Moto G41的谷歌助手按钮。指纹扫描仪位于电源按钮上。

虽然Moto G41的显示屏只占正面的83%,但Moto G42的显示屏几乎占了86%,这是由于显示屏的对角线已经从6.4英寸最小限度地增加到6.43英寸。因此,屏幕的边框更窄一些,但只有当你把两部智能手机直接放在一起时,你才能真正注意到这种差异。然而,最引人注目的是另一件事:虽然Moto G41的冲孔自拍相机被一个银环所包围,但Moto G42却不是这样的。制造商还没有提供任何关于显示屏保护类型的信息。

摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42

尺寸比较

164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 189 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.3 mm 178 g160.6 mm 73.5 mm 8.3 mm 175 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g

连接性--Moto G42有高达6GB的内存和128GB的存储。

在中欧,摩托罗拉只提供一种存储配置的Moto G42。配备4GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 2.2存储空间,价格约为250欧元(MSRP)。在其他地区,它还提供6GB的内存。Moto G42在当地的网上商店也有4/64GB存储空间的缩小版--就像我们的评测样本一样。在我们评测时,后者的售价约为200欧元(约204美元)。内部存储可以通过一个容量高达1TB的microSD卡来扩展。卡槽中还有空间容纳两张SIM卡。

3.5毫米音频插孔和调频收音机是Moto G42的部分功能,还有立体声扬声器、NFC和蓝牙5.0。USB-C端口只能以USB 2.0的速度工作,但它支持USB OTG,因此可以用来连接外围设备和存储设备。由于也支持DRM Widevine L1,这款智能手机也能以高清质量串流内容。

左图:双卡双待+microSD
左图:双卡双待+microSD
右边。音量摇杆、电源按钮
右边。音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,麦克风
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

在使用Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡的测试中,Moto G42的读卡器实现了良好的连续读取和写入率。在复制测试中,数据吞吐量也是可观的,尽管三星Galaxy A12的速度几乎是它的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +70%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
28.2 MB/s ∼59%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
25.6 MB/s ∼54% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s ∼52% -12%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼51% -14%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼43% -27%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.1 (23.8-43.1)
; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (30-87.4)

软件 - 保证三年的安全更新和一次操作系统升级

Moto G42在很大程度上运行库存Android 12,摩托罗拉通过其Moto应用程序对其进行了强化。这允许用户从不同的设计、字体和图标形状中进行选择,以及配置手势控制和启用我们从其他摩托罗拉手机中了解的预览显示功能。尽管有AMOLED显示屏,但没有Always-On功能。

摩托罗拉将为Moto G42提供为期三年的Android 安全更新。一个操作系统的更新,因此也保证更新到Android 13。在测试时(7月中旬),Android 安全补丁处于5月1日的水平,因此已不太符合最新情况。

摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42

通信和GNSS - 没有5G,但Wi-Fi和GPS性能稳定

与许多其他现代智能手机相比,Moto G42并没有配备5G连接。然而,买家得到了一个坚实的通信包,因为Moto G42在欧洲不太可能有接收问题,这要归功于其11个LTE频率。

这款摩托罗拉智能手机在本地网络中以Wi-Fi 5的速度运行。连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,Moto G42实现了体面的传输速率,在发送和接收数据方面也相当稳定。然而,它不能击败Moto G41,因为后者的速度还是要快一些。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=73, last 2 years)
615 MBit/s ∼100% +163%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
332 (302min - 340max) MBit/s ∼54% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s ∼48% +27%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
282 (186min - 332max) MBit/s ∼46% +21%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼40% +4%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
234 (203min - 256max) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (61.4 - 1710, n=74, last 2 years)
645 MBit/s ∼100% +111%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
367 (350min - 381max) MBit/s ∼57% +20%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼54% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s ∼50% +6%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
311 (181min - 368max) MBit/s ∼48% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
305 (269min - 336max) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=195, last 2 years)
484 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=196, last 2 years)
467 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø233 (203-256)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (269-336)
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
GPS波段
GPS波段

Moto G42使用GPS、GLONASS和Galileo卫星导航服务来确定其位置。它能够确定其位置,在室内的精确度可达4米,在室外则增加到3米。

我们的实地测试表明,这款智能手机有时会缺乏一点精确度。在骑自行车时,为了直接比较,我们带上了Garmin Venu2,Moto G42经常偏离轨道,特别是在城市地区。然而,在人口不太密集的地区,定位的准确性几乎与参考设备一样。然而,GPS的精确度足以满足日常使用。

摩托罗拉Moto G42: 概述
摩托罗拉Moto G42: 概述
摩托罗拉Moto G42: 桥梁
摩托罗拉Moto G42: 桥梁
摩托罗拉Moto G42:转折点
摩托罗拉Moto G42:转折点
Garmin Venu 2: 概述
Garmin Venu 2: 概述
Garmin Venu 2: 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2: 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2:转折点
Garmin Venu 2:转折点

电话和通话质量 - 真正的双卡双待

Moto G42在打电话时提供了良好的通话质量。在使用扬声器和免提模式时,清晰度仍然很高。然而,在测试中,我们的声音偶尔会让电话另一端的人听起来有点闷。

不像 摩托G41,Moto G42提供真正的双SIM卡功能,因为除了一张microSD卡外,还可以在卡槽中插入两张SIM卡。还支持VoWiFi和VoLTE。摩托罗拉使其智能手机的辐射值可以通过手机应用程序访问,当你在数字字段中输入*#07#。然后你可以看到,Moto G42属于辐射水平相当低的智能手机,头部SAR为0.58W/kg,身体SAR为1.12W/kg。

摄像机 - 5000万像素的三摄像头设置

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Moto G42的自拍相机的分辨率为1600万像素,可以以每秒30帧的速度录制全高清视频。你不应该对图片质量有太多的期望。然而,这款相机可以进行体面的自拍,并在人像模式下可靠地模糊背景。然而,它很快就会被低光照条件所克服。

Moto G42的后盖有一个带自动对焦的5千万像素主摄像头(f/1.8),一个8百万像素的超广角摄像头(f/2.2),和一个2百万像素的微距摄像头。后者更像是一个很好的补充,而不是真正有用的东西,但考虑到其有限的能力,它的工作一点也不差。超广角相机甚至为这个价格范围提供了高于平均水平的图像质量,它可以捕捉到令人惊讶的大量细节。虽然图片边缘很快变得嘈杂和模糊,但整体效果绝对值得尊敬。

在白天用5千万像素的主摄像头拍摄的照片也是引人注目的。颜色看起来很真实,动态范围很好,图像清晰度也很合适。低光照片不是主摄像头的强项,但可以通过可选的夜间模式从拍摄对象中提取更多细节。

主摄像头和超广角摄像头以及自拍摄像头都能以每秒最多30帧的速度录制全高清视频。拍摄时不可能在镜头之间进行切换。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用超广角相机拍摄的照片
用超广角相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angleLow-light photo
click to load images

我们在测试实验室发现,在最佳照明条件下,主摄像头可以相当准确地捕捉颜色,但当涉及到绿色和蓝色的暗色调时,它更明显地偏离了理想线。即使在1勒克斯的余光下,你仍然可以几乎完全识别测试图,但只是以非常模糊的方式。

ColorChecker
18 ∆E
15 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G42: 13.13 ∆E min: 2.6 - max: 22.58 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
57.1 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
46 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
66.5 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G42: 41.8 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 67.74 ∆E

配件和保修 - 用20瓦的电源适配器充电

摩托罗拉Moto G42交付时有一个20瓦的电源适配器,一条USB线(Type-A转C),一个SIM卡工具,一个透明保护套,一份快速启动指南,以及一本包含安全说明的小册子。你可以在摩托罗拉的网上商店获得耳机、蓝牙音箱和屏幕保护膜等配件。

摩托罗拉Moto G42享有24个月的 保修在欧盟地区有24个月的保修期。此外,如果选择Moto Care,保修期可以延长到三年。保险。

输入设备和处理 - 指纹扫描仪集成在电源按钮中

Moto G42在60赫兹的6.4英寸显示屏上实现了非常快速和精确的输入。虽然Snapdragon 680 4G并没有使Moto G42成为一匹赛马,但它为日常任务和偶尔的游戏提供了足够的动力。然而,在使用过程中,很明显,这款智能手机并没有那么多的性能资源。例如,在几个打开的应用程序之间切换时,或在刚启动时,会出现短暂的延迟。

机箱右侧的电源按钮还放置了指纹传感器,可以快速可靠地解锁智能手机。第二种不太安全的生物识别认证方法是2D面部解锁。只要有足够的环境光线和/或足够明亮的显示屏,面部识别就能达到与指纹传感器相当的速度和准确性。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 更加明亮的AMOLED显示屏,700 cd/m²

子像素网格
子像素网格

摩托罗拉Moto G42配备了AMOLED面板,像素为2,400x1,080(全高清+)。就6.43英寸的显示屏对角线而言,这相当于409PPI的像素密度,这保证了图像的清晰度。与中档对手不同,如 小米Redmi Note 11小米拥有90赫兹的OLED显示屏,而Moto G42的刷新率却只有60赫兹。

在纯白背景下,Moto G42的AMOLED面板平均发出699cd/m²的亮度。如果在屏幕的较小区域(APL18)重复测量,亮度会增加到745cd/m²,这对中档智能手机来说是一个非常好的结果。另一个积极的方面是该显示屏的亮度分布非常均匀。

在最低亮度设置下,AMOLED面板的闪烁频率约为240赫兹,这可能会困扰敏感的用户。然而,在较高的显示亮度设置下,从大约25%开始,闪烁已经几乎消失。因此,显示设置中没有直流调光选项的事实并不是一个问题。

691
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
727
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 727 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 699.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 691 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.02 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.205
Motorola Moto G42
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G41
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A76
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
-53%
-55%
-212%
-214%
-11%
Brightness middle
691
713
3%
569
-18%
585
-15%
446
-35%
702
2%
Brightness
699
712
2%
562
-20%
558
-20%
423
-39%
701
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
90
-5%
89
-6%
88
-7%
98
3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.6
0.29
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.02
1.1
-8%
2.16
-112%
4.4
-331%
4.94
-384%
1
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.73
2.39
-38%
3.37
-95%
8.77
-407%
8.81
-409%
2.3
-33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
3.7
-270%
1.8
-80%
5.9
-490%
5.1
-410%
1.4
-40%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.264 97%
2.177 101%
2.228 99%
2.145 103%
2.2 100%
CCT
6621 98%
7373 88%
6784 96%
8001 81%
7890 82%
6520 100%
Contrast
1138
975
1538

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 239.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 239.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 239.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0%
0%
50%
50%
75%
75%
100%
100%

在固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

除了 "饱和 "预设模式外,还可以在显示器设置中选择 "自然 "图片模式。它的名字也是目的,因为这种模式使显示器的色彩和灰度再现绝对理想,每种情况下的DeltaE值都在1左右。伽玛、色温和RGB平衡等参数也堪称典范。AMOLED面板可以覆盖98.6%的sRGB色彩空间,以及更大的AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间的73.9%和73.6%。

色彩精度(自然显示模式)
色彩精度(自然显示模式)
灰度(自然显示模式)
灰度(自然显示模式)
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式)
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式)
色彩空间(自然显示模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间(自然显示模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间(自然显示模式,AdobeRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间(自然显示模式,AdobeRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间(自然显示模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(自然显示模式,DCI-P3目标色彩空间)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.3 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.1 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Moto G42为户外使用提供了良好的条件。如果避免阳光直射,即使从平坦的视角也能顺利阅读内容。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙680 4G的Moto G42

Moto G42采用了中档次的 Snapdragon 680 4GSoC,由4GB的内存支持。该阿德雷诺610作为图形单元。这一硬件基础有助于智能手机实现稳固的系统性能。在使用过程中有时会有小的延迟,但实际上总体上并不令人讨厌。

在基准测试中,Moto G42在与竞争对手的竞争中保持了良好的地位,总体上排名在中游水平。然而,它很难将自己与它的前辈Moto G41区分开来。 摩托G41和它的联发科Helio G85SoC。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
687 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼56% +2%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼56% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=8)
379 Points ∼55% +1%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
376 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
352 Points ∼51% -6%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼43% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼26% -53%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points ∼78% +10%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼75% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=8)
1625 Points ∼73% +3%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1583 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1282 Points ∼57% -19%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼53% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼49% -31%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=126, last 2 years)
556641 Points ∼100% +134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
252044 Points ∼45% +6%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
238371 Points ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (207780 - 252044, n=3)
232732 Points ∼42% -2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
231224 Points ∼42% -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼100% +65%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼79% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points ∼75% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5884 - 8730, n=8)
7028 Points ∼69% +14%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6749 Points ∼66% +9%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6679 Points ∼65% +8%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6176 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼56% -7%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=67, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼100% +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points ∼53% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (325 - 413, n=4)
363 Points ∼49% +12%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
325 Points ∼44% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
325 Points ∼44%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=176, last 2 years)
4356 Points ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points ∼63% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2564 - 2738, n=4)
2613 Points ∼60% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2564 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2138 Points ∼49% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Points ∼38% -36%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=176, last 2 years)
7717 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5852 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points ∼75% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5667 - 5852, n=4)
5763 Points ∼75% -2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4353 Points ∼56% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Points ∼43% -43%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=176, last 2 years)
4981 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points ∼77% +4%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3669 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (3424 - 3824, n=4)
3600 Points ∼72% -2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2834 Points ∼57% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Points ∼37% -50%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=176, last 2 years)
7789 Points ∼100% +257%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points ∼28% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2181 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2123 - 2183, n=4)
2167 Points ∼28% -1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1811 Points ∼23% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Points ∼16% -42%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=176, last 2 years)
1391 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points ∼86% +30%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1028 Points ∼74% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (917 - 1199, n=4)
1027 Points ∼74% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Points ∼68% +3%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
923 Points ∼66%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=146, last 2 years)
55254 Points ∼100% +1179%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6049 Points ∼11% +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Points ∼9% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4320 - 4995, n=4)
4757 Points ∼9% +10%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4725 Points ∼9% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Points ∼8% +3%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4320 Points ∼8%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼100% +46%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
129 Points ∼71% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points ∼70% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼64% -7%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 Points ∼12% -82%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
732 Points ∼100% +65%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
464 Points ∼63% +5%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
443 Points ∼61%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
439 Points ∼60% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Points ∼59% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points ∼58% -4%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
736 Points ∼100% +65%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
463 Points ∼63% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points ∼61% 0%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
446 Points ∼61% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
445 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
428 Points ∼58% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2628 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2576 Points ∼98% +4%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2476 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2098 Points ∼80% -15%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1567 Points ∼60% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1273 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points ∼91% +3%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1145 Points ∼90% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1121 Points ∼88%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
919 Points ∼72% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
839 Points ∼66% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1426 Points ∼100% +12%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1306 Points ∼92% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1276 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points ∼88% -2%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1074 Points ∼75% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼67% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3036 Points ∼100% +8%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2814 Points ∼93%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points ∼88% -5%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2662 Points ∼88% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points ∼85% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2109 Points ∼69% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1269 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points ∼94% +1%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points ∼94%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1184 Points ∼93% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
939 Points ∼74% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
736 Points ∼58% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1434 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points ∼96% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1366 Points ∼95%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1352 Points ∼94% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points ∼77% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
867 Points ∼60% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2957 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2692 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Points ∼90% -1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2647 Points ∼90% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2048 Points ∼69% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1989 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1627 Points ∼82% -18%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1471 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1126 Points ∼56% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2112 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1827 Points ∼86% -13%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1656 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1411 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Points ∼97% +2%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1357 Points ∼96% +1%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1339 Points ∼95%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1103 Points ∼78% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
863 Points ∼61% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1238 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Points ∼96% +2%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1177 Points ∼95% +1%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1170 Points ∼95%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
935 Points ∼76% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points ∼60% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2959 Points ∼100% +9%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2930 Points ∼99% +8%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2707 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2558 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2031 Points ∼69% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2186 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Points ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1729 Points ∼79% -21%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1710 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1273 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2053 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1684 Points ∼82% -18%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1518 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1142 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3063 Points ∼100% +8%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points ∼92%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2673 Points ∼87% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points ∼85% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2032 Points ∼66% -28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼93% +6%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps ∼83% -6%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼58% -34%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼91% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps ∼89%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼57% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼52% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼100% +40%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps ∼79% +10%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼61% -15%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼50% -30%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼100% +14%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼64% -27%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼64% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼100% +36%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼68% -7%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼46% -38%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps ∼46% -38%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +7%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼94%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼88% -7%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼59% -37%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼100% +49%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps ∼75% +11%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps ∼66% -1%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼45% -32%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps ∼91% +4%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼64% -28%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps ∼63% -29%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps ∼100% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼64% +40%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps ∼49% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼45% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps ∼45%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.4 fps ∼31% -32%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps ∼100% +6%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps ∼97% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps ∼94% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps ∼65% -31%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps ∼65% -31%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps ∼65% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps ∼52% +4%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼50% 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.5 fps ∼50%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼32% -36%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps ∼99%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼98% -1%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.2 fps ∼63% -36%
realme C35
Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps ∼62% -37%


Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
65 Points ∼100% +55%
realme C35 (Chrome 101)
45.399 Points ∼70% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points ∼67% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (40.7 - 43.5, n=4)
42 Points ∼65% 0%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
41.845 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
31.3 Points ∼48% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
21.24 Points ∼33% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
63 runs/min ∼100% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min ∼63% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (37.5 - 40.1, n=4)
38.7 runs/min ∼61% +2%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
37.8 runs/min ∼60%
realme C35
34.44 runs/min ∼55% -9%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
27.8 runs/min ∼44% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
16.3 runs/min ∼26% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 265, n=184, last 2 years)
95.1 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points ∼70% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (59 - 67, n=3)
62 Points ∼65% +5%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
59 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
46 Points ∼48% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
38 Points ∼40% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=191, last 2 years)
24476 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points ∼53% +6%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
12937 Points ∼53% +5%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
12364 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (10729 - 13141, n=5)
12335 Points ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
5849 Points ∼24% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
8472 ms * ∼100% -154%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
3464 ms * ∼41% -4%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
3341.4 ms * ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (3183 - 3341, n=3)
3253 ms * ∼38% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 14832, n=189, last 2 years)
2906 ms * ∼34% +13%

* ... smaller is better

说到存储性能,拥有UFS 2.2存储的Moto G42明显优于摩托G41和其缓慢的eMMC存储。此外,就其价格范围而言,这款智能手机的读写性能绝对令人满意。

Motorola Moto G42Motorola Moto G41Oppo A76realme C35Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FXiaomi Redmi Note 11Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-55%
27%
-2%
-65%
14%
-5%
14%
Sequential Read 256KB
843.09
298.5
-65%
980.7
16%
907.1
8%
302.3
-64%
895.34
6%
831 ?(511 - 928, n=7)
-1%
944 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
12%
Sequential Write 256KB
436.32
172.3
-61%
711.7
63%
271.1
-38%
74.5
-83%
519.23
19%
340 ?(120.6 - 519, n=7)
-22%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=260, last 2 years)
15%
Random Read 4KB
122.08
86.9
-29%
174.7
43%
137.8
13%
77.8
-36%
172.95
42%
133.2 ?(88.5 - 173, n=7)
9%
171.2 ?(13.5 - 345, n=260, last 2 years)
40%
Random Write 4KB
186.23
64.4
-65%
162.7
-13%
206.4
11%
47.21
-75%
163.29
-12%
177.4 ?(95.4 - 213, n=7)
-5%
167.6 ?(30.3 - 475, n=261, last 2 years)
-10%

游戏--在有限制的情况下顺利运行

骁龙680 4G运行在Moto G42中,其Adreno 610图形单元对于未来的游戏时代来说,只有有限的性能储备。

然而,现代游戏,包括像《PUBG Mobile》这样的复杂游戏,只要图形细节不设置得太高,就不会对智能手机构成太大挑战。在《PUBG Mobile》中,无论如何你都不能选择比 "平衡 "更高的图形设置。因此,这款射击游戏仍然可以在几乎恒定的25FPS下玩。在图形更简单的Armajet中,Moto G42几乎可以充分利用其60赫兹显示屏,它甚至可以达到平均59FPS。

我们用我们的Gamebench来确定游戏帧率测试工具确定。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.7 (52-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 2.0.0: Ø25 (23-27)

排放 - 在使用过程中始终保持低温

温度

在使用过程中,Moto G42几乎没有发热,所以它从未感到不舒服的温度。我们在表面测量到的最高温度为39.6℃(约103°F)。

Moto G42还很好地控制了内部SoC的废热。正如3DMark压力测试所显示的那样,即使在连续负载的情况下,它也几乎总是能充分利用其性能。如果发生性能损失,也是如此之小,以至于无法察觉。

Max. Load
 39.6 °C33.5 °C31.5 °C 
 38.6 °C33.7 °C32.2 °C 
 37.4 °C33 °C31.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
32 °C33.5 °C37.5 °C
32 °C34.2 °C39.7 °C
32 °C34.6 °C37.9 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 % ∼100% +2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.3 % ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 % ∼97% -1%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.733 (0.725-0.746)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.093 (1.087-1.098)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.67 (2.66-2.68)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.34 (4.29-4.35)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)
摩托罗拉Moto G42
摩托罗拉Moto G42

发言人

Moto G42配备了支持Dolby Atmos的立体声扬声器,最大音量达到81.1 dB(A),即使音量开到最大,也不会失真。双扬声器系统以非常平衡的方式传达了中音和高音,而低音却没有。

Moto G42提供了一个3.5毫米音频插孔,用于有线耳机和扬声器。蓝牙5.0用于无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.738.62535.736.43127.329.94033.333.55037.434.26325.225.88018.221.810020.523.412513.535.416017.343.220013.547.825013.550.231513.155.840012.959.750013.36763015.467.380014.167.8100012.973.712509.671.3160010.671.5200010.370.825001168.4315012.670.4400015.265.6500016.866.7630016.466.4800016.566.11000016.663.31250015.960.51600016.655.2SPL26.381.1N0.749.7median 13.5median 66.1Delta1.97.838.945.344.745.33436.736.836.742.640.637.333.826.225.928.327.622.422.218.933.41640.514.546.313.253.81359.116.565.119.566.219.66617.468.515.374.415.378.515.778.416.576.317.977.520.870.32267.220.974.121.772.722.870.32263.122.558.531.586.41.462.6median 18.9median 66.2311.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G42Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G42 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--Moto G42的亮点之一

能源消耗

Moto G42的功耗非常克制,空闲使用时为1.5瓦,负载时平均为2.6瓦。附带的电源适配器也可以说是克制的。它能提供20瓦,但它不能完全提供,因为Moto G42最多只能用18瓦充电。在测试中,需要2:03小时才能将空电池恢复到100%。这款智能手机不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 2.6 / 4.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G42
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
realme C35
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
9%
-28%
-6%
1%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.8
20%
1.4
-40%
1.06
-6%
0.953 ?(0.8 - 1.06, n=3)
5%
0.896 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=199, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.1
27%
1.1
27%
1.9
-27%
1.93
-29%
1.51 ?(1.1 - 1.93, n=3)
-1%
1.651 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=199, last 2 years)
-10%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.6
20%
1.4
30%
2.1
-5%
1.96
2%
1.82 ?(1.5 - 2, n=3)
9%
1.87 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=199, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
2.6
4.3
-65%
3.1
-19%
3.8
-46%
2.87
-10%
2.79 ?(2.6 - 2.9, n=3)
-7%
4.43 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=199, last 2 years)
-70%
Load Maximum *
4.5
6.5
-44%
5.1
-13%
5.6
-24%
3.85
14%
4.45 ?(3.85 - 5, n=3)
1%
7.29 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=199, last 2 years)
-62%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø2.72 (0.592-4.88)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.25 (2.08-3.61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 1min: Ø1.685 (1.636-1.81)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 1min: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面,Moto G42胜出一筹。这款手机骁龙680 4G并非最快的SoC,但由于其节俭的操作,它为我们的评测单元提供了相当多的续航能力。

Moto G42的5000毫安时电池在近16小时的模拟网络浏览后耗尽,在播放视频时甚至能持续近20小时。然而,看一下竞争对手,就会发现这种超强的运行时间几乎已经成为中端产品的标准。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 46min
Motorola Moto G42
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
Oppo A76
5000 mAh
realme C35
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
5%
1%
-3%
-6%
Reader / Idle
2223
1849
-17%
2094
-6%
2098
-6%
H.264
1185
1298
10%
1078
-9%
1076
-9%
WiFi v1.3
949
905
-5%
993
5%
958
1%
879
-7%
842
-11%
Load
406
411
1%
455
12%
409
1%

Pros

+ 低重量
+ 明亮的OLED面板
+ 3.5毫米音频插孔
+ 双SIM卡加microSD
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 包括20瓦的电源适配器
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 性能
- 没有5G
- 刷新率只有60赫兹

对摩托罗拉Moto G42的评判

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G42。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G42。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。

摩托罗拉Moto G42是一款不错的中档智能手机,具有很高的性价比。特别是有两个特点使它脱颖而出。电池寿命长,以及明亮的AMOLED显示屏。后者的亮度约为700cd/m²,不仅高于中档标准,而且还以良好的图像质量和均匀的照明给人留下深刻印象。然而,它的刷新率不超过60赫兹。

有预算意识的买家在寻找一款价格合理、设备齐全的智能手机时,应该仔细看看摩托罗拉Moto G42。

Moto G42的性能并不出众,因为它的 Snapdragon 680 4G但它为日常使用提供了令人满意的性能。Moto G42还因其5000万像素的摄像头而获得加分,在日光下也能拍出好照片。立体声扬声器、真正的双SIM卡功能、3.5毫米音频插孔和保证三年内的安全补丁更新,这些都是它的良好特性。

摩托罗拉Moto G42的另一个选择是 小米Redmi Note 11它提供了一个几乎同样明亮的AMOLED显示屏,但有90赫兹。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,你可以在亚马逊上找到Moto G42的4/64GB配置,价格约为255美元。售价约为255美元。

Motorola Moto G42 - 07/19/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
88%
Games Performance
14 / 64 → 23%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
65%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G42智能手机评论。700尼特的OLED轻量级,价格便宜
Manuel Masiero, 2022-07-24 (Update: 2022-07-24)